Small home · Licensed for 6 · San Diego
Carpel Board & Care Facility #2
2091 Hanford Drive, San Diego, CA 92111Licensed since 1988
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 4 residents
- Hospiceup to 2 residents
Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
FACILITY SERVES SIX (6) ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND ABOVE; FOUR (4) OF WHOM MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR TWO (2) RESIDENTS.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Carpel Board & Care Facility #2: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$3,950a month to start
Likely $3,250–$4,850
From 15 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$3,950likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$3,950likely $3,250–$4,850
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,250–$5,050
- $3,950
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,850–$8,300
- $6,450
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes15 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,000 to $10,000
15 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,900–$6,400.
- Mission Carehome NorthSan Diego · 0.8 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mission Carehome SouthSan Diego · 0.8 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Gold Canyon Care HomeSan Diego · 1.0 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mission Villa WestSan Diego · 1.8 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Mission Villa EastSan Diego · 1.8 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Emerald Guest HomeSan Diego · 1.8 mi · Small home$2,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Canyon Guest HomeSan Diego · 3.1 mi · Small home$7,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Right Choice Senior Living ClairemontSan Diego · 3.3 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Harborview Senior Assisted LivingSan Diego · 3.6 mi · Mid-size home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Twain Residential CareSan Diego · 4.0 mi · Mid-size home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Thrive Elder CareSan Diego · 4.0 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Clairemont Guest HomeSan Diego · 4.1 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Sea Breeze Senior LivingLa Jolla · 4.7 mi · Small home$10,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- La Jolla Casa FiestaLa Jolla · 4.7 mi · Small home$8,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Butterfly Gardens IILa Jolla · 4.8 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
2091 Hanford Drive, San Diego, CA 92111Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and NewbornsHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.2 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #372004506 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 4 of 8 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unsubstantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not treat residents with dignity Staff did not assist resident with toileting needs
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA)Tiffany Holmes contacted the facility to deliver findings for a complaint investigation via tele-virtual. LPA identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit and the basic elements of the complaint with Leonor Carmona, Administrator LPA previously conducted interviews with residents, staff, and outside sources, made observations, and obtained and reviewed pertinent records. LPA Ruiz conducted the initial visit on June 2, 2022 and conducted a tour of the facility. It was alleged that the staff did not treat residents with dignity and the staff did not assist resident with toileting needs. Interviews with the staff revealed they treat the residents with respect and treat them like family. Interviews revealed that the residents that needed assistance with toielting would get receive the assistance. Interviews revealed that the residents that were there in 2022 are no longer at the facility due to passing away or moving out. Interviews with staff revealed that they denied making residents use the restroom in their rooms. Interviews with staff revealed them denying not treating the residents with dignity. The investigation did not produce supporting evidence to prove the staff did not treat residents with dignity and staff did not assist resident with toileting needs. The complaint allegations are unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with Leonor Carmona, Administrator and a copy of this report along with Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC 9058 03/22) was provided at the conclusion of the visit. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 3, 2026 · control 08-AS-20220527143642
Jun 25, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janet Ngallo conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was allowed entry and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Leonor Carmona. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6)residents. Four (4) of whom may be non-ambulatory. Hospice waiver approved for two (2) residents. LPA, accompanied by Administrator toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. Hot water temperature was compliant. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. Their are no bodies of water on the premises. Per licensee, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were present. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] [Cont. from LIC 809] LPA interviewed staff and residents. LPA reviewed multiple staff and resident records/files. LPA interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The files which LPA reviewed contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Leonor Carmona whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 25, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jul 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Ramin Hashemi and Nacole Patterson conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPAs were welcomed by and discussed the purpose of the visit to Licensee Leonor Carmona. The facility's license shows a maximum capacity of six (6) residents of which four (4) are non-ambulatory residents, ages 60 and over. The facility has an approved hospice waiver for two (2). During today’s inspection there were 5 residents in care. LPAs and Licensee Loenor Carmona toured the interior and exterior of the facility and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Client bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, screens, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and client activities. The facility contained at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food, all safely stored. Cooking, dining equipment, and utensils were present. No toxic chemicals or poisons were accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. No pools or bodies of water exist on the premises. Per Licensee Leonor Carmona, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all in working order. Fire extinguisher(s) were serviced within the last 12 months. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. LPAs interviewed staff and clients, and reviewed facility records. The files reviewed by LPAs contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. Deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22 (refer to the attached LIC809-D). A plan of correction was jointly developed with the licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Leonor Carmona to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 24, 2025
20241 state visit · 1 document
Jul 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ramon Serrano conducted an unannounced Required Annual Inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was allowed entry and discussed the purpose of the visit with Administrator Leonor Carmona. According to the facility’s license, the facility has a maximum capacity of six (6)residents. Four (4) of whom may be non-ambulatory. Hospice waiver approved for two (2) residents. LPA, accompanied by Administrator toured the interior and exterior of the facility, and inspected each room. The facility was clean, sanitary, and in good repair. Pathways were free of obstruction and slip hazards. Resident bedrooms contained the required furnishings. Doors, windows, toilets, and showers were in working order. Extra linens and hygiene supplies were present, as well as Personal Protective Equipment. Hot water temperature was measured in the facility at 117 degrees F. The ambient temperature inside the facility was measured at 78 degrees F. The facility had sufficient space and equipment to facilitate dining, laundry, visitation, meetings, and resident activities. There was at least 2 days of perishable food, and at least 7 days non-perishable food present, all safely stored. Cooking/dining equipment and utensils were present. There were no toxic chemicals/poisons accessible to clients. Medications were labeled, as required, and stored in locked areas. Their are no bodies of water on the premises. Per Administrator, no firearms or ammunition are kept at the facility. Carbon monoxide detectors, emergency lighting, and facility telephone were all working. Fire extinguisher(s) were present. First aid kit(s) were complete and readily accessible. Required licensing postings were observed in visible areas of the facility. [CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C] LPA interviewed staff and attempted to interview residents. LPA reviewed multiple staff and resident records/files. LPA interviews did not raise any licensing concerns. The files which LPA reviewed contained required documents. Confidential records were stored in locked areas. No deficiencies were observed or cited during today's annual inspection. An exit interview was conducted with Leonor Carmona whom a copy of this report and the Licensee/Appeal Rights (LIC9058 03/22) were provided during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2022 · 4 documents
20223 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 27, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Pena visited the facility and conducted an unannounced Required 1 - Year inspection. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPA was greeted by, identified himself to, and explained the purpose of the visit to Caregivers, Concepcion Lopez and Helen Nerizon. LPA was granted entry into the facility. Licensee, Leonor Carmona arrived and participated in the inspection. All staff that were present have a current criminal record clearance. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility and verified compliance with infection control practices. LPA observed one central entry point for universal entry screening; routine symptom screening initiated at entry for staff, clients and visitors and a sign-in policy enacted for visitors. Infection control related signs to promote hand hygiene, cough/sneeze etiquette, symptom and transmission awareness were observed. LPA discussed fit-testing staff for N-95 respirators. Staff wore face coverings and hand sanitizer/hand washing stations were readily available. LPA observed an available visitation area and the facility had an ample supply of cleaning products and PPE. The facility will request N-95 respirators from the Regional Office. No deficiencies were cited during today’s visit. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee, Carmona and a copy of this report and Licensee Rights (LIC 9058 FAS 01/16) was provided at the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 27, 2022
Jun 2, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced case management visit to provide consultation with the Licensee during a complaint investigation visit which occurred on 6/2/2022. LPA was greeted by, identified herself to, and explained the purpose of the visit to Licensee Leonor Carmona. During the visit, LPA observed the residents in care, provided guidance, and reviewed forms with the Licensee. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Leonor Carmona, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee's Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided via hard copy.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 2, 2022
May 23, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Licensee did not follow Infection Control practices
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced visit to deliver investigation findings regarding the above mentioned allegation. LPA identified herself, was allowed entry by, and explained the purpose of the visit to Licensee Leonor Carmona. The Department’s investigation consisted of interviews with staff and outside sources and a tour of the facility. It was alleged that facility staff did not follow COVID-19 Infection Control practices. Outside interviews revealed that facility staff did not wear face coverings or masks while in the facility. During the initial complaint visit on 12/23/2021, LPA Ruiz observed Licensee Leonor Carmona, who resides at the facility, was not wearing a mask or face covering while in the kitchen. LPA Ruiz also observed the Licensee wearing a surgical mask that did not cover her mouth and nose and was pulled down under her chin during the visit. Continued on LIC9099-C page. Substantiated During an interview with the Licensee, she admitted that she does not always wear a mask or a face covering while at the facility and stated it was because she does not provide direct care to residents. The Licensee also acknowledged that she needed to wear a mask or face covering at all times while outside her living quarters. Based on the evidence obtained during the investigation, the Department has found that facility staff did not follow COVID-19 Infection Control practices. Therefore, the allegation is deemed substantiated, which means that the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met and the allegation is valid. The following deficiency was cited per CA Code of Regulations Title 22 and noted on the attached LIC9099-D page. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee Leonor Carmona, to whom a copy of this report and the Licensee Rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided via hard copy.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2022 · control 08-AS-20211217110929
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 6, 2022
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilties (a)(2) To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishing and equipment. This requirement has not been met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and LPA observations, the Licensee did not wear a mask or face covering while at the facility. This poses a potential health risk to 6 of 6 residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 23, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee will conduct an in-service training on masking guidance and will provide sign in sheet to LPA by POC date.
20211 state visit · 1 document
Jul 26, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Dang Nguyen and Rebecca Ruiz conducted an unannounced Required 1 - Year Visit. The facility file was reviewed prior to the visit. LPAs were greeted by, identified themselves to, and explained the purpose of the visit to Administrator Leonor Carmona. All staff present have a current criminal record clearance. LPAs conducted a brief tour of the facility, both inside and outside, and observed the clients in care. In accordance with the Department’s Infection Control, LPAs provided technical assistance and observed and evaluated the facility's implementation of their COVID-19 Mitigation Plan, to include disinfection, testing surveillance, screening protocols, and the use of personal protective equipment. No deficiencies were cited on this date. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Leonor Carmona, to whom a copy of this report and the licensee appeal rights (LIC9058 01/16) were provided via E-mail.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 26, 2021
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the May 23, 2022 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Carmona, Leonor Pelayo, licensed since 1988.
Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Carpel Board and Care Facility · San Diego
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 1988, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 7
- Total complaints
- 2
- Substantiated allegations
- 1
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 1988, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 1 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 2 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Carpel Board & Care Facility #2
Is Carpel Board & Care Facility #2 licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Carpel Board & Care Facility #2 licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Carpel Board & Care Facility #2 been cited?
0 Type A and 1 Type B citation since 1988, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 7 state visits over the same years.
Is Carpel Board & Care Facility #2 still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Carpel Board & Care Facility #2 cost?
$3,950 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,250–$4,850. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 15 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 51 other homes of a similar licensed size in San Diego that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 51 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Carpel Board & Care Facility #2 take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Carmona, Leonor Pelayo, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Sharp Mary Birch Hospital for Women and Newborns is 1.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Carpel Board & Care Facility #2 keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Carpel Board & Care Facility #2 license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “CARPEL BOARD & CARE FACILITY #2”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #372004506. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Carmona, Leonor Pelayo, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 1988, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 7 state inspection visits since 1988, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 1 Type B citation on file since 1988, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 7 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 1988, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is July 3, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Diego County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,250–$6,450On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$3,800 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$3,800 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$3,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,200–$4,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,150On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Diego County