Excelcare is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Loma Linda, San Bernardino County, California — state license #366425610, licensed for 10 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 23 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated June 19, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

27 homes in view

Excelcare

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 10 residents · Loma Linda, CA · San Bernardino County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #366425610, held since 2013 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
11400 Poplar Street · Loma Linda, San Bernardino County
Phone
(909) 796-4553
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 10 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 5 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
10 NON-AMBULATORY. DEMENTIA PLAN OF OPERATION IN PLACE. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIVE (5).State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 27 times and filed 23 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 19, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
June 19, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
4 of 10 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 17 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 7, 2023 to June 19, 2026. 17 of the 17 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (15). 17 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 17 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 20 of 23 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure a resident is being properly fed Staff do not ensure a resident consumed an appropriate amount of liquid Staff served a resident spoiled food Staff are not abiding to the admission agreement Staff do not timely address a resident's change in medical condition Staff do not meet a resident's bathing needs Staff do not provide a comfortable temperature for a resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Caregiver Rose Viernes and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding Allegation #1: During the lunch observation, LPA noted that the resident’s meal appeared to be of good quality. LPA also observed an adequate supply of perishable and non perishable food items for residents in care. LPA interviewed two (2) staff members, both of whom stated that residents are being properly fed. LPA additionally interviewed four (4) residents, all of whom confirmed they are properly fed. Regarding Allegation #2: LPA observed a cup of water in each resident’s bedroom. LPA interviewed two (2) staff members, both stating they ensure residents are drinking enough water. The Administrator also stated that water is always available in residents’ rooms. LPA interviewed five (5) residents, all of whom reported receivingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2026 · control 56-AS-20251204115820
Jun 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining pressure injuries while in care Staff did not ensure a resident consumed an appropriate amount of liquid while in care Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care Staff allowed a resident to be soiled while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Caregiver Rose Viernes and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding Allegation #1: It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) developed a pressure injury while in care due to staff neglect. LPA was unable to interview R1, as they are no longer a resident of the facility. LPA interviewed two (2) staff members. One (1) staff member reported that, to their knowledge, R1 did not have any pressure injuries. The second staff member stated that R1 had a small stage 2 wound on the buttocks; however, they did not believe it was the result of neglect. The Administrator reported suspecting that R1 may have had cancer and stated the concern was communicated to InnovAge. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2026 · control 56-AS-20250324114757
May 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was not accorded dignity in their relationship with a person in the home

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Dorris Anderson and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that a resident was not accorded dignity in their relationship with a person in the home, interviews with the Administrator and resident revealed that the individual in question was a minor family member. In accordance with regulations, minors are not required to undergo fingerprinting or background clearance. The individual was not residing in the home during the investigation, and interviews indicate that during the period in which they did reside at the home, they were not disruptive to residents. Based on LPAs observations and interviews, the above allegation is Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the allethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260210101558
20257 state visits · 11 documents
Dec 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure facility is kept clean. Staff does not ensure resident's clothing are properly dried.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Dorris Anderson, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation #1, LPA toured and observed the facility to be clean. LPA interviewed 5 residents, 4 of the 5 residents informed LPA, staff ensure the facility is kept clean. 1 of the 5 residents was unable to answer LPA’s question. LPA interviewed caregiver on duty and informed LPA the facility is always kept clean. Administrator states the facility is always kept clean and they clean morning and night. Regarding allegation #2, LPA interviewed 5 residents, 2 of the 5 residents were unable to answer the question. 3 of the 5 residents informed LPA staff properly dry, fold, and store their clothing; the same 3 residents informed LPA staff do not hang dry their clothes outside. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 29, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251223092904
Dec 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing residents food of good quality. Staff do not provide resident with a variety of food. Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Administrator Dorris Anderson and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation #1, LPA observed the resident’s meal during lunch and it appeared to be of good quality. LPA interviewed 5 residents, 4 of the 5 residents informed LPA the food being provided is of good quality. 1 of the 5 residents was unable to answer LPA’s question. LPA interviewed two (2) staff both informed LPA the residents are being provided with good quality food every day. Administrator informs LPA they follow the food plan from Loma Linda University to help maintain their good health. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 29, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251208093045
Dec 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not follow physicians orders

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Dorris Anderson, and discussed the purpose of the visit. It is alleged staff are not following physician’s orders, based on record review, interviews with residents staff and Licensee. LPA did not find any discrepancies to corroborate the allegation. LPA was unable to interview R1 due to no longer residing at the facility, R1 moved out the day before Thanksgiving on 11/26/25. Therefore, the allegation above is Unsubstantiated. An Unsubstantiated complaint means, that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Myrna Jackson and a copy of this report was provided at the conclusion of the visit. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251124161821
Dec 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not treat residents with dignity or respect

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Dorris Anderson, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation above, LPA interviewed two (2) staff; both whom agreed they treat residents with dignity and respect. LPA interviewed five (5) residents, one (1) of the five (5) residents informed LPA they are treated with dignity and respect, four (4) of the five (5) residents were unable to provide LPA with detailed information due to their health conditions. Therefore, the allegation above is Unsubstantiated. An Unsubstantiated complaint means, that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Myrna Jackson and a copy of this report was provided at the conclusion of the visit. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251126131126
Nov 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not assist resident with toileting in a timely manner. Facility staff are unable to communicate effectively with the residents. Facility staff did not ensure privacy to resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Dorris Anderson, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation #1, LPA interviewed six (6) residents. Four (4) of the six (6) residents are independent and do not need assistance with toileting, all 4 residents have denied witnessing or hearing staff not assisting other residents with toileting needs in a timely manner. Two (2) of the six (6) residents interviewed need assistance with toileting needs, 1 of the 2 residents informed LPA staff attend to their toileting needs in a timely manner. R1 informed LPA last week, they were left in bed for over an hour and did not receive assistance with their toileting needs, however R1 stated when they are upset they tend to retaliate with staff. LPA interviewed an outside party and informed LPA they were on the phone during the alleged incident and Rthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250926120025
Oct 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not store food properly Staff does not ensure an adequate supply of food is maintained and accessible at the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Dorris Anderson, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding Allegation #1, LPA toured the facility and observed the main refrigerator in the kitchen had frosted over in the back of the refrigerator. LPA spoke with Administrator and LPA was informed the freezer is not properly working causing the frost. Administrator included the freezer drawer is being used as a refrigerator storing vegetables, while another freezer held all the frozen foods. Regarding Allegation #2, LPA did not observe an adequate number of fruits and vegetables for residents in care. The strawberries in the refrigerator observed to be growing mold. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250326095909
Mar 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring that resident attends medical appointments.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Dorris Anderson, Licensee, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of Licensee, staff, resident, outside party interviews and pertinent document review. Regarding the allegation, staff are not ensuring that resident attends medical appointments, the Licensees’ interview reveals, resident #1 (R1) missed their doctor’s appointment due to not having help to transfer resident out of bed. Facility staff were not able to transfer R1 out of bed to attend their doctor’s appointment due to R1 being too heavy. Although R1 had transportation available for doctor’s appointments through an outside agency, drivers are not permitted to assist facility staff with out-of-bed transfers. LPA review of resident appraisal of services needed reveals, R1 needs help in transferring in and out of bed or chair. Based on evidence obtained during this investigation, thethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2025 · control 56-AS-20230727155713
Feb 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not ensuring that resident is being fed an adequate amount of food portions.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Dorris Anderson and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation staff is not ensuring that resident is being fed an adequate amount of food portions. LPA Ramirez conducted 6 resident interviews. 4 out of 6 residents informed LPA they are being fed adequate food portions and if they wish to have more food they could ask for more. 2 out of 6 residents informed LPA their food portions are often small. LPA conducted 4 staff interviews. 4 out of 4 staff informed LPA every resident is different regarding food portions, some eat more than others. However there's enough food for seconds and always remind residents they can ask for more. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2025 · control 56-AS-20241122101015
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure facility is kept at a comfortable temperature for residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Doris Anderson and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation above. LPA conducted interviews with staff and residents, toured, and observed the facility. LPA observed the facility thermostat to read 69 and 70 degrees F. LPA Ramirez conducted 6 resident interviews, 2 out of 6 residents informed LPA the facility is cold. 2 out of 6 residents informed LPA the facility is kept at a good temperature, 2 out of 6 residents informed LPA the facility is cold sometimes, however they notify the staff when it's too cold and the temperature is adjusted. LPA was also informed the heater is turned on at night while residents sleep. LPA conducted 3 staff interviews, 2 out of the 3 staff informed LPA the facility is cold sometimes, however the Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241127151903
Nov 15, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20233 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 18, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident unattended for extended periods

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Dorris Anderson, Licensee and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff left resident unattended for extended periods, Administrator and (4) staff interviews deny leaving residents unattended for extended periods. Four (4) staff and (7) resident interviews reveal that the after returning from the Innovage program, the Innovage driver brings residents directly inside the facility. In addition, seven (7) resident interviews reveal that they have not witnessed residents being left unattended for extended periods. Based on pertinent record review and interviews with relevant parties, the allegation is Unsubstantiated; a finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where thisthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 14, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230911151218
Sep 8, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff speak inappropriately to residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Dorris Anderson, Licensee and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA observations, pertinent document review, and interviews with relevant parties. Regarding the allegation, staff speak inappropriately to residents in care, Licensee and staff interviewed deny speaking inappropriately to residents in care. Five (5) out of (7) residents interviewed deny that staff have spoken inappropriately to them, nor have they witnessed staff speak inappropriately to other residents. Based on information obtained during the investigation, the allegation is Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted with where this report was discussed and a copy of this report with appeal rights was providthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 8, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230725152152
Sep 8, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff not rotating and repositioning resulting in resident sustaining a pressure injury

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Dorris Anderson, Licensee and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA observations, pertinent document review, and interviews with relevant parties. Regarding allegation, staff not rotating and repositioning resulting in resident sustaining a pressure injury, Licensee and staff interviewed deny resident sustained a pressure wound do to staff not rotating and repositioning. Licensee stated that resident 1 (R1) receives bed baths and repositioned regularly to prevent pressure injuries. Interviews with medical professionals reveal that pressure injuries were not observed on R1. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 8, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230721153154
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints6typical 0
Total complaints17typical 1
State visits on file27typical 8
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 307 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2013.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262302025711220242202023670
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (909) 796-4553

Is Excelcare licensed?

Yes — Excelcare is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Loma Linda (San Bernardino County): California license #366425610, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 10 residents. State records list 23 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 19, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Excelcare care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Excelcare with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record10 NON-AMBULATORY. DEMENTIA PLAN OF OPERATION IN PLACE. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FIVE (5).

How much does Excelcare cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Excelcare's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Excelcare accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Excelcare is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 10 beds occupied (40%) when the state visited on June 19, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Excelcare?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 27 state visits and 23 dated documents since 2023 for Excelcare; 17 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 19, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

17 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure a resident is being properly fed Staff do not ensure a resident consumed an appropriate amount of liquid Staff served a resident spoiled food Staff are not abiding to the admission agreement Staff do not timely address a resident's change in medical condition Staff do not meet a resident's bathing needs Staff do not provide a comfortable temperature for a resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Caregiver Rose Viernes and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding Allegation #1: During the lunch observation, LPA noted that the resident’s meal appeared to be of good quality. LPA also observed an adequate supply of perishable and non perishable food items for residents in care. LPA interviewed two (2) staff members, both of whom stated that residents are being properly fed. LPA additionally interviewed four (4) residents, all of whom confirmed they are properly fed. Regarding Allegation #2: LPA observed a cup of water in each resident’s bedroom. LPA interviewed two (2) staff members, both stating they ensure residents are drinking enough water. The Administrator also stated that water is always available in residents’ rooms. LPA interviewed five (5) residents, all of whom reported receivingCDSS inspection report, June 19, 2026 · control 56-AS-20251204115820
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining pressure injuries while in care Staff did not ensure a resident consumed an appropriate amount of liquid while in care Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care Staff allowed a resident to be soiled while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Caregiver Rose Viernes and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding Allegation #1: It was alleged that Resident #1 (R1) developed a pressure injury while in care due to staff neglect. LPA was unable to interview R1, as they are no longer a resident of the facility. LPA interviewed two (2) staff members. One (1) staff member reported that, to their knowledge, R1 did not have any pressure injuries. The second staff member stated that R1 had a small stage 2 wound on the buttocks; however, they did not believe it was the result of neglect. The Administrator reported suspecting that R1 may have had cancer and stated the concern was communicated to InnovAge. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 19, 2026 · control 56-AS-20250324114757
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was not accorded dignity in their relationship with a person in the home
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Dorris Anderson and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation that a resident was not accorded dignity in their relationship with a person in the home, interviews with the Administrator and resident revealed that the individual in question was a minor family member. In accordance with regulations, minors are not required to undergo fingerprinting or background clearance. The individual was not residing in the home during the investigation, and interviews indicate that during the period in which they did reside at the home, they were not disruptive to residents. Based on LPAs observations and interviews, the above allegation is Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleCDSS inspection report, May 21, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260210101558

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure facility is kept clean. Staff does not ensure resident's clothing are properly dried.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Dorris Anderson, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation #1, LPA toured and observed the facility to be clean. LPA interviewed 5 residents, 4 of the 5 residents informed LPA, staff ensure the facility is kept clean. 1 of the 5 residents was unable to answer LPA’s question. LPA interviewed caregiver on duty and informed LPA the facility is always kept clean. Administrator states the facility is always kept clean and they clean morning and night. Regarding allegation #2, LPA interviewed 5 residents, 2 of the 5 residents were unable to answer the question. 3 of the 5 residents informed LPA staff properly dry, fold, and store their clothing; the same 3 residents informed LPA staff do not hang dry their clothes outside. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 29, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251223092904
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing residents food of good quality. Staff do not provide resident with a variety of food. Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations mentioned above. LPA met with Administrator Dorris Anderson and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation #1, LPA observed the resident’s meal during lunch and it appeared to be of good quality. LPA interviewed 5 residents, 4 of the 5 residents informed LPA the food being provided is of good quality. 1 of the 5 residents was unable to answer LPA’s question. LPA interviewed two (2) staff both informed LPA the residents are being provided with good quality food every day. Administrator informs LPA they follow the food plan from Loma Linda University to help maintain their good health. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 29, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251208093045
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not follow physicians orders
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Dorris Anderson, and discussed the purpose of the visit. It is alleged staff are not following physician’s orders, based on record review, interviews with residents staff and Licensee. LPA did not find any discrepancies to corroborate the allegation. LPA was unable to interview R1 due to no longer residing at the facility, R1 moved out the day before Thanksgiving on 11/26/25. Therefore, the allegation above is Unsubstantiated. An Unsubstantiated complaint means, that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Myrna Jackson and a copy of this report was provided at the conclusion of the visit. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 2, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251124161821
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not treat residents with dignity or respect
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Dorris Anderson, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation above, LPA interviewed two (2) staff; both whom agreed they treat residents with dignity and respect. LPA interviewed five (5) residents, one (1) of the five (5) residents informed LPA they are treated with dignity and respect, four (4) of the five (5) residents were unable to provide LPA with detailed information due to their health conditions. Therefore, the allegation above is Unsubstantiated. An Unsubstantiated complaint means, that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver Myrna Jackson and a copy of this report was provided at the conclusion of the visit. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 2, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251126131126
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not assist resident with toileting in a timely manner. Facility staff are unable to communicate effectively with the residents. Facility staff did not ensure privacy to resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Dorris Anderson, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation #1, LPA interviewed six (6) residents. Four (4) of the six (6) residents are independent and do not need assistance with toileting, all 4 residents have denied witnessing or hearing staff not assisting other residents with toileting needs in a timely manner. Two (2) of the six (6) residents interviewed need assistance with toileting needs, 1 of the 2 residents informed LPA staff attend to their toileting needs in a timely manner. R1 informed LPA last week, they were left in bed for over an hour and did not receive assistance with their toileting needs, however R1 stated when they are upset they tend to retaliate with staff. LPA interviewed an outside party and informed LPA they were on the phone during the alleged incident and RCDSS inspection report, October 3, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250926120025
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not store food properly Staff does not ensure an adequate supply of food is maintained and accessible at the facility
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Dorris Anderson, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding Allegation #1, LPA toured the facility and observed the main refrigerator in the kitchen had frosted over in the back of the refrigerator. LPA spoke with Administrator and LPA was informed the freezer is not properly working causing the frost. Administrator included the freezer drawer is being used as a refrigerator storing vegetables, while another freezer held all the frozen foods. Regarding Allegation #2, LPA did not observe an adequate number of fruits and vegetables for residents in care. The strawberries in the refrigerator observed to be growing mold. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 28, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250326095909
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not ensuring that resident attends medical appointments.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Dorris Anderson, Licensee, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of Licensee, staff, resident, outside party interviews and pertinent document review. Regarding the allegation, staff are not ensuring that resident attends medical appointments, the Licensees’ interview reveals, resident #1 (R1) missed their doctor’s appointment due to not having help to transfer resident out of bed. Facility staff were not able to transfer R1 out of bed to attend their doctor’s appointment due to R1 being too heavy. Although R1 had transportation available for doctor’s appointments through an outside agency, drivers are not permitted to assist facility staff with out-of-bed transfers. LPA review of resident appraisal of services needed reveals, R1 needs help in transferring in and out of bed or chair. Based on evidence obtained during this investigation, theCDSS inspection report, March 21, 2025 · control 56-AS-20230727155713
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is not ensuring that resident is being fed an adequate amount of food portions.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator Dorris Anderson and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation staff is not ensuring that resident is being fed an adequate amount of food portions. LPA Ramirez conducted 6 resident interviews. 4 out of 6 residents informed LPA they are being fed adequate food portions and if they wish to have more food they could ask for more. 2 out of 6 residents informed LPA their food portions are often small. LPA conducted 4 staff interviews. 4 out of 4 staff informed LPA every resident is different regarding food portions, some eat more than others. However there's enough food for seconds and always remind residents they can ask for more. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 20, 2025 · control 56-AS-20241122101015

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure facility is kept at a comfortable temperature for residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Doris Anderson and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation above. LPA conducted interviews with staff and residents, toured, and observed the facility. LPA observed the facility thermostat to read 69 and 70 degrees F. LPA Ramirez conducted 6 resident interviews, 2 out of 6 residents informed LPA the facility is cold. 2 out of 6 residents informed LPA the facility is kept at a good temperature, 2 out of 6 residents informed LPA the facility is cold sometimes, however they notify the staff when it's too cold and the temperature is adjusted. LPA was also informed the heater is turned on at night while residents sleep. LPA conducted 3 staff interviews, 2 out of the 3 staff informed LPA the facility is cold sometimes, however the UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 2, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241127151903

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 27 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
17
typical for this size: 1
State visits on file
27
typical for this size: 8
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(909) 796-4553
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Excelcare? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.