Chino Hills Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Chino Hills, San Bernardino County, California — state license #366425024, licensed for 94 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 29 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated February 25, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 35 times and filed 29 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated February 25, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 16 documents with transcribed findings, dated November 3, 2021 to October 6, 2025. 16 of the 16 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (13). 16 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 16 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Feb 25, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 6, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff are not meeting residents personal hygiene needs. Staff do not ensure residents are provided with fresh clean linens. Staff are not providing enough supervision to prevent self harming behavior. Staff are not dispensing medication as prescribed.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Julie Dion and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, record review, and observation. First allegation: Staff are not meeting residents’ personal hygiene needs. Regarding the allegation LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1 and Staff #2 LPA went over the allegation with S#1 and S#2, Staff #1 and S#2 informed LPA that facility had a meeting with R#1 responsible party regarding concerns addressing to the allegation. Staff #1 and Staff #2 informed LPA that facility cannot force R#1 to take showers, concern that was addressed to R#1 responsible party. Staff #1 and Staff #2 informed LPA that staff encourages R#1 to shower, and brush teeth, and at times encouragement is successful however, other times R#1 refuses. On 8/28/2025, LPA attempted to conduct an interview with R#1 however, R#1the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 6, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250826145931
Oct 6, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Apr 3, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care. Staff left resident in a soiled diaper for a long period of time. Staff did not clean resident's bedroom floor. Staff did not safeguard resident's personal items. Staff do not ensure that resident is provided with clean clothng as needed.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Business Office Manager Lizeth (Lisa) Gomez and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care. Regarding the allegation “Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care” LPA conducted an interview with Resident #1 regarding the allegation and Resident #1 informed LPA that the injurie[s] on R#1 (L) shin and knee are old injuries that R#1 sustained during an accidental fall. Resident #1 denied abuse and informed LPA that injuries sustained are old injuries. LPA conducted a review of records and discovered through facilities (Unusual Incident/Injury Reports), that Resident #1 has been found on the floor sitting next to the bed or wheelchair; Resident#1 denied any falls and stated that Resident had crawthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250327105844
Feb 6, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not properly maintain the facility Staff do not properly report incidents involving a resident Staff do not meet the needs of a resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Julie Dion and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Staff did not properly maintain the facility. Regarding the allegation, LPA conducted a facility walkthrough accompanied by facility administrator. During the walkthrough LPA observed facility to be clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for residents in care. LPA conducted an inspection inside Resident #1 room and observed room to be clean, well-organized, and free from bodily fluids. Second allegation: Staff do not properly report incidents involving a resident. Regarding the allegation “Staff do not properly report incidents involving a resident” LPA requested records pertaining to Resident #1 regarding R#1 incident reports. During record review LPA discovthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 6, 2025 · control 56-AS-20241118091753
Feb 6, 2025Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is not kept free of insects and rodents Facility serves poor quality food
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Julie Dion and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First allegation: Facility is not kept free of insects and rodents. Regarding the allegation “Facility is not kept free of insects and rodents” LPA conducted a walkthrough of the facility during the walkthrough LPA inspected facilities kitchen area and LPA observed facility to be clean, organized, and free of insects and rodents. LPA collected pest control invoices and observed that facility utilizes Terminix as a company of service who service the facility every Friday. LPA observed that facility is free of insects and rodents. LPA conducted interviews with R#1-3 and all informed LPA that they have not witnessed or seen any insects or rodents around the facility. Second allegation: Facility sthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 6, 2025 · control 56-AS-20220629090628
Aug 23, 2024Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility failed to meet residents care needs Staff did not treat resident with dignity or respect
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Julie Dion and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Facility failed to meet residents care needs. LPA conducted a file review on Resident #1 for the allegation: “facility failed to meet resident care needs”, during file review LPA obtained and reviewed video footages of Resident #1 LPA observed Resident #1 to be complaining of pain on two separate occasions to staff LPA observed that on both occasions staff disregarded Resident#1 complaint towards pain walked out of Resident#1 room without asking the resident if they were in need of medical help or assistance. Second allegation, Staff did not treat resident with dignity or respect. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 23, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240429145055
May 15, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility roof is in disrepair.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Julie Dion and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of Observation, interviews, and review of records. First allegation, Facility roof is in disrepair. On 2/9/2024 LPA conducted a walkthrough of the facility dining room area and observed that a flyer indicating “Dining room is under repair” was posted on the entrance of dining the dining room door. LPA observed that the dining room was enclosed and observed building material to be present. Facility administrator informed LPA that the dining room area had a roof leak and that they are in the process of repair. Facility Administrator informed LPA that residents along with family members were made aware of the repairs and informed all residents that meal accommodations will be delivered to each resident’s rooms until the dining room leak repair is cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 15, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240206105318
May 15, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Feb 9, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that residents were administered their medications as prescribed. Staff member does not have required training to provide care to residents.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Office Manager Lizeth Gomez and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Staff did not ensure that residents were administered their medications as prescribed. During interviews and review of records LPA observed that medications was administered to all resdients however, due to staffing coflict residents medication was administered late based on Med Variance report. Second allegation, Staff member does not have required training to provide care to residents. During interviews and review of records LPA observed training certificates for all Med-Techs along with staffing support to be on file. Based on documentation and trainings facility staff have the qualifications to provide care to residents. Based on the evidence obtained during the course of the investigation, LPthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2024 · control 56-AS-20231109090240
Feb 9, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility not adequately cleaned. Staff do not provide adequate food services to residents.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Office Manager Lizeth Gomez and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation, Facility not adequately cleaned. During interviews and review of records LPA observed that housekeeping is completed on daily basis. LPA conducted a walkthrough of the facility and observed facility to be clean and clear of obstructions. Second allegation, Staff do not provide adequate food services to residents. During interviews, record review and observations, LPA conducted a walkthrough of facility kitchen an observed kitchen to be clean and observed all kitchen appliances to be clean and sanitized. LPA inspected non-perishable and perishable food supply and observed food to be in good standing based on expiration dates. LPA conducted interviews with kitchen staff, and all stated that any leftthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2024 · control 18-AS-20211228082003
Feb 9, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Chino Hills Senior Living licensed?
Yes — Chino Hills Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Chino Hills (San Bernardino County): California license #366425024, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 94 residents. State records list 29 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated February 25, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Chino Hills Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Chino Hills Senior Living with clearances for dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGES 60 AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR 94 NON-AMBULATORIES WHERE 2O CAN BE BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 15. NEW MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVE 1/8/2025: CHINO HILLS MGR LLC.
How much does Chino Hills Senior Living cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Chino Hills Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Chino Hills Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Chino Hills Senior Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
70 of 94 beds occupied (74%) when the state visited on October 6, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Chino Hills Senior Living?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 35 state visits and 29 dated documents since 2021 for Chino Hills Senior Living; 16 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 6, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2025
2024
2023
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 35 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(909) 606-2553Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Chino Hills Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.