Oakmont Of Chino Hills is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Chino Hills, San Bernardino County, California — state license #361881162, licensed for 170 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 12 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 7, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Oakmont Of Chino Hills

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 170 residents · Chino Hills, CA · San Bernardino County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #361881162, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
14837 Peyton Drive · Chino Hills, San Bernardino County
Phone
(909) 606-3010
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 170 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 15 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 170 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED FOR MEMORY UNIT. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15. BEDRIDDEN 1ST FLOOR ROOMS #100-124, 221-226, 327-348.State service designations940 - ADULTS · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 14 times and filed 12 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 7, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
May 7, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
136 of 170 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 6, 2023 to May 7, 2026. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (5). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 8 of 12 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
May 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents resulting in sickness

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Facility Administrator Janeth Medrano and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegations stated above. First allegation: Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents resulting in sickness. Regarding the allegation stated above, LPA conducted interviews with Residents #1-5, regarding the alleged allegation and Residents #1-5 informed LPA that they have not been served food that is raw, cold, or not cooked thoroughly. Residents #1-5 also denied getting sick or food poisoning due to the food. LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1-5 regarding the alleged allegation and Staff #1-5 informed LPA that it was reported that residents did fall sick however, it was not due to food poising but rather the stomach flu which was reported to Community Care Licensing and Department of Public Health. Staff #1 informed LPA that last symptoms were reported on 4the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 7, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260501101218
Apr 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Oct 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not refund preadmission fees.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Director Janeth Medrano and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and record review. First allegation, Licensee did not refund preadmission fees. LPA conducted an interview with Facility Director Janeth Medrano who explained that a refund check to Resident #1 was given on 2/7/2024. LPA Guerrero obtained a copy of Resident #1 Service Agreement document and observed the description and breakdown of the fees that were owed to the facility along with the total amount that will refunded back to Resident #1. Based on documentation LPA observed that Resident #1 personally picked-up a refund check at Oakmont of Chino Hills on 2/7/2024. Based on the evidence obtained during the course of the investigation, LPA has determined that the above allegation is Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 14, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240209102015
20231 state visit · 2 documents
Sep 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff pushed resident resulting in injury. Staff handled residents in a rough manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Janeth Medrano and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and a review of records. First allegation, Staff pushed resident resulting in injury. LPA conducted interviews with Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4, all stated that they are not treated in an inappropriate manner or pushed by staff. Residents #1-4 stated that they have not witnessed staff push residents or treat residents in an inappropriate manner. LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1, Staff #2, Staff #3 and Staff #4, all staff denied pushing residents and deny treating residents in an inappropriate manner. Second allegation, Staff handled residents in a rough manner. LPA conducted interviews with Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4, all stated that they are not being handled in a rothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230717101455
Sep 15, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff disclosed resident's confidential information to another resident. Staff did not adequately supervise residents resulting in resident being sexually harassed by another resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Janeth Medrano and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and a review of records. First allegation, Staff disclosed resident's confidential information to another resident. During interviews with Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4, residents stated that they feel comfortable going to staff and know that confidential information will not be disclosed to other residents. During interviews with staff, staff denied disclosing Resident #5 confidential information to Resident #1. Staff #1 stated that because of the nature of the situation in which Resident #1 sexually harassed Resident #5 Via Phone; staff intervened and addressed the concern to Resident #1 and suggested to Resident #1 to no longer contact Resident #5 via cellphone. Second allegation, Staff did not adequately supervithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 15, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230716160901
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints0typical 2
Total complaints7typical 7
State visits on file14typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202633020251102024220202323020221102021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (909) 606-3010

Is Oakmont Of Chino Hills licensed?

Yes — Oakmont Of Chino Hills is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Chino Hills (San Bernardino County): California license #361881162, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 170 residents. State records list 12 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 7, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Oakmont Of Chino Hills care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Oakmont Of Chino Hills with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 170 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. DELAYED EGRESS APPROVED FOR MEMORY UNIT. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15. BEDRIDDEN 1ST FLOOR ROOMS #100-124, 221-226, 327-348.

How much does Oakmont Of Chino Hills cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Oakmont Of Chino Hills's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Oakmont Of Chino Hills accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Oakmont Of Chino Hills is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

136 of 170 beds occupied (80%) when the state visited on May 7, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Oakmont Of Chino Hills?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 14 state visits and 12 dated documents since 2021 for Oakmont Of Chino Hills; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 7, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing adequate food service to residents resulting in sickness
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Facility Administrator Janeth Medrano and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegations stated above. First allegation: Staff are not providing adequate food service to residents resulting in sickness. Regarding the allegation stated above, LPA conducted interviews with Residents #1-5, regarding the alleged allegation and Residents #1-5 informed LPA that they have not been served food that is raw, cold, or not cooked thoroughly. Residents #1-5 also denied getting sick or food poisoning due to the food. LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1-5 regarding the alleged allegation and Staff #1-5 informed LPA that it was reported that residents did fall sick however, it was not due to food poising but rather the stomach flu which was reported to Community Care Licensing and Department of Public Health. Staff #1 informed LPA that last symptoms were reported on 4CDSS inspection report, May 7, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260501101218

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not refund preadmission fees.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Director Janeth Medrano and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and record review. First allegation, Licensee did not refund preadmission fees. LPA conducted an interview with Facility Director Janeth Medrano who explained that a refund check to Resident #1 was given on 2/7/2024. LPA Guerrero obtained a copy of Resident #1 Service Agreement document and observed the description and breakdown of the fees that were owed to the facility along with the total amount that will refunded back to Resident #1. Based on documentation LPA observed that Resident #1 personally picked-up a refund check at Oakmont of Chino Hills on 2/7/2024. Based on the evidence obtained during the course of the investigation, LPA has determined that the above allegation is Unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 14, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240209102015

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff pushed resident resulting in injury. Staff handled residents in a rough manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Janeth Medrano and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and a review of records. First allegation, Staff pushed resident resulting in injury. LPA conducted interviews with Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4, all stated that they are not treated in an inappropriate manner or pushed by staff. Residents #1-4 stated that they have not witnessed staff push residents or treat residents in an inappropriate manner. LPA conducted interviews with Staff #1, Staff #2, Staff #3 and Staff #4, all staff denied pushing residents and deny treating residents in an inappropriate manner. Second allegation, Staff handled residents in a rough manner. LPA conducted interviews with Resident #1, Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4, all stated that they are not being handled in a roCDSS inspection report, September 15, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230717101455
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff disclosed resident's confidential information to another resident. Staff did not adequately supervise residents resulting in resident being sexually harassed by another resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA met with Facility Administrator Janeth Medrano and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and a review of records. First allegation, Staff disclosed resident's confidential information to another resident. During interviews with Resident #2, Resident #3, and Resident #4, residents stated that they feel comfortable going to staff and know that confidential information will not be disclosed to other residents. During interviews with staff, staff denied disclosing Resident #5 confidential information to Resident #1. Staff #1 stated that because of the nature of the situation in which Resident #1 sexually harassed Resident #5 Via Phone; staff intervened and addressed the concern to Resident #1 and suggested to Resident #1 to no longer contact Resident #5 via cellphone. Second allegation, Staff did not adequately superviCDSS inspection report, September 15, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230716160901
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents developed pressure injuries while in care. Staff do not meet residents' incontinence care needs. Staff speaks inappropriately to residents. Staff handles residents in a rough manner. Staff provide care to residents while under the influence of a substance.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate and issue findings for the allegations listed above. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and was granted entry and met with Administrator Janeth Medrano. The visit today consisted of interviews with residents and staff, and document review. For allegation, Residents developed pressure injuries while in care: During document review, LPA discovered that the facility has four (4) residents that have pressure injuries. The four (4) residents are being provided wound care by either home health or hospice. During interviews staff, the staff informed LPA that four (4) residents receive wound care from either home health or hospice. The staff stated that the facility does not treat the pressure injuries. The staff follows instructions from home health and or hospice and will contact the outside providers if there is notice in the resident’s care needs. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 6, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230628121056

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 14 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
7
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
14
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(909) 606-3010
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Oakmont Of Chino Hills? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.