Mid-size home · Licensed for 15 · Yucca Valley
Aaspen Villagecare
7633 Kickapoo Trail, Yucca Valley, CA 92284Licensed since 2009
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 15: a mid-size care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 15 residents
- Hospiceup to 3 residents
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Not on file: dementia approval.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
15 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Aaspen Villagecare: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,300a month to start
Likely $3,350–$5,650
From 23 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,300likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,300likely $3,350–$5,650
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 23 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 24 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,350–$5,800
- $4,300
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,100–$8,950
- $6,800
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes23 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $7,000
23 homes like this within 24 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,450–$5,050.
- Angelic MansionsYucca Valley · 3.1 mi · Mid-size home$3,490Listed on its own website · shared quarters with a shared bathroom · seen October 5, 2026
- High Desert Residential CareYucca Valley · 4.4 mi · Mid-size home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Neighbor Care Assisted LivingDesert Hot Springs · 11 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Serrano Residential Care for the ElderlyPalm Springs · 18 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Luna Senior LivingPalm Springs · 18 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- 8 Amara CareCathedral City · 19 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Desert Starlight Senior Care HomeCathedral City · 19 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Luna Senior ServicesPalm Springs · 19 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Stonewall Gardens Assisted LivingPalm Springs · 19 mi · Mid-size home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Aubrey's VillasCathedral City · 19 mi · Mid-size home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- 4J's Elderly CareCathedral City · 20 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Tender Loving Care Assisted LivingCathedral City · 20 mi · Small home$2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Dolores HomecareCathedral City · 20 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Gerada Home CareCathedral City · 20 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Attentive Manor IICathedral City · 20 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Angel HomecareCathedral City · 20 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- A Romero's RetreatCathedral City · 20 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Angel's Haven Care Rancho MirageRancho Mirage · 21 mi · Small home$7,000Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
- Angel's Haven Care Cathedral CityCathedral City · 23 mi · Small home$6,500Listed on its own website · seen October 27, 2026
- Campbell's Loving Home CareRancho Mirage · 23 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Luna Assisted LivingRancho Mirage · 23 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Casa De HarknessPalm Desert · 23 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- St. Mary's Love and Care HomePalm Desert · 24 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 23 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 24 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
7633 Kickapoo Trail, Yucca Valley, CA 92284Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
The state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #366423788 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 6 of 11 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unfounded”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Sarina Ramirez and Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPAs met with House Manager Amanda Roberts, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (15), a current census of (7). LPAs conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility does not have a swimming pool or similar bodies of water. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for resident activities, however an activities schedule is not created/posted; deficiency issued. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors/carbon monoxide alarms, working laundry equipment, and telephone service. Four (4) Resident’s showers, toilets, and hand washing areas were operating properly. The hot water temperature in one (1) resident bathrooms measured between 113.1 degrees F. Five (5) resident’s bedrooms had beds, bed linen, chairs, dresser, storage space and sufficient lighting. The facility has sufficient linens, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, Labor laws, facility sketch, CCLD complaint poster, and Ombudsman poster. Continuation on LIC – 809C: Food Service: Facility kitchen is under construction, dining area is maintained clean . The facility has sufficient perishable food supply, but not non perishable food supply for residents in care, deficiency issued. Sharps and chemicals were kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour/7days a week care staff. Medical Related Services: Resident’s medications are labeled and centrally stored in a locked room. Four (4) residents medications were audited at random, R3's medication is not being administered per physician's orders, deficiency issued. Record Review: Four (4) Staff files reviewed were observed to be incomplete, Staff #1 (S1) had a missing health screening, technical violation issued. Staff #3 (S3) was not associated to the facility through guardian deficiency issued. Personnel files did not have in service training, deficiency issued. Three (3) Resident files reviewed were observed to be complete. Based on observations and record review technical violations and deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report along with LIC 809C, LIC 809D, LIC 9102, and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to House Manager Amanda Roberts at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 26, 2026
The state marks this report as 9 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 8. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20254 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file
Type of visit: Office
On June 27, 2025, the Department held an informal office meeting to discuss the status of all Aaspen Village Care facilities. In attendance was Regional Manager (RM) Leslie Mendiveles, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Karen Clemons, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Sarina Ramirez and Licensee Khan Mushtaq. During today's meeting the following was discussed: 1. The status of the facility operation. 2. Eviction Procedures/Plan of Closure 3. Notification in Compliance with Title 22 4. Licensee/Administrator Responsibilities/ Staffing 5. Accountability of Licensee Governing Body 6. Residents in care. The Licensee informed the Department the facility will not be closing. The following was requested: LIC 500, LIC 9020, copies of letters to residents rescinding eviction, list of residents who relocated and where they moved to. All documents requested are due by Monday June 30,2025. The following documents were provided to Licensee: Accountability of Licensee Governing Body, Administrator Qualifications and duties, Eviction Procedures, Transfer of Resident upon forfeiture of License or Change in use of facility. On 4/29/25 House Manager Amanda Roberts and Administrator Chris Tanabe emailed LPA copies of eviction letters to residents regarding renovations. The letters were not approved and the licensee agreed to resend the letters and provide licensing with corrected copies of a temporary relocation notice. In the future the Licensee has agreed to follow Title 22 procedures regarding facility closure. An exit interview was conducted with the Licensee and a copy was provided at the conclusion of the meetingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2025
Jun 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency pages: Type B, Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a Health and Safety check. LPA met with House Manager Amanda Roberts, and discussed the purpose of the visit. House Manager Roberts stated there was five (5) residents residing at the facility, LPA interviewed three (3) residents, 2 of the 3 residents interviewed explained to LPA they received eviction letters, 1 of the 3 stated they did not receive an eviction letter. House Manager Roberts explained to LPA as of yesterday the residents were no longer being evicted. One (1) resident was sleeping and was unable to be interviewed, One (1) resident was out in the community and was also unable to be interviewed. LPA toured the facility, LPA observed four (4) empty rooms. Rooms #1,2,6&7 remained empty with no residents or beds, however room #6 was unsanitary with feces on floor; deficiency issued. LPA explained to House Manager Roberts the Licensee has yet to contact CCLD regarding the status of Aaspen Village Care facilities, LPA advised Roberts to notify Licensee about an office meeting that has been scheduled and provided a copy of the correspondence. Based on observation deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6 of The California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where the Licensing reports were discussed and copies of the reports with Appeal Rights was provided to House Manager Amanda Roberts.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.682 · Plan of correction due date: Jun 28, 2025
1569.682 Transfer of resident upon forfeiture of license or change in use of facility; duties of licensee; closure plan; duty of department upon licensee’s failure to comply; civil penalties(a) A licensee of a licensed residential care facility for the elderly shall, prior to transferring a resident of the facility to another facility or to an independent living arrangement as a result of the forfeiture of a license...or a change of use of the facility pursuant to the department’s regulations, take all reasonable steps to transfer affected residents safely and to minimize possible transfer trauma……..(b) If seven or more residents of a residential care facility for the elderly will be transferred...the licensee shall submit a proposed closure plan to the department for approval. The department shall approve or disapprove the closure plan, and monitor its implementation...(6) Until the department has approved a licensee’s closure plan, the facility shall not issue a notice of transfer or require any resident to transfer. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based upon record review and interviews, Administrator/Licensee did not submit closure plan to CCLD for approval. This violation posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025
Plan of correction: House Manager Roberts was advised to notify Licensee about office meeting to discuss the status of facilities.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 20, 2025
87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by leaving room #6 unsanitary with feces on floor and cabinets loose off their hinges in the kitchen which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in carethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025
Plan of correction: House Manager has agreed to clean empty rooms and repair broken cabinets in kitchen by POC due date and submit proof to LPA
May 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that facility has an adequate amount of food in refrigerator and freezer for the residents. Staff did not ensure that there is substance or variety in the food served to the residents. Staff did not ensure that food served to the residents matches what is on the menu. Staff is not following the residents' special diets.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPA met with House Manager, Amanda Roberts, to discuss the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegations, staff did not ensure that facility has an adequate amount of food in refrigerator and freezer for the residents, staff did not ensure that there is substance or variety in the food served to the residents, staff did not ensure that food served to the residents matches what is on the menu, staff is not following the residents' special diets, the investigation reveals the complaint was filed under a similar name but incorrect facility number. Based on investigation findings, the allegations above are Unfounded. A finding that the complaint is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted where this report was reviewed and a copy provided to the House Manager at the conclusion of the visit. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2025 · control 56-AS-20230627113631
Jan 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with House Manager Amanda Roberts, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (15), a current census of (13). LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility does not have a swimming pool or similar bodies of water. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for resident activities. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors/carbon monoxide alarms, working laundry equipment, and telephone service. Resident’s showers, toilets, and hand washing areas were operating properly. The hot water temperature in two (2) resident bathrooms measured between 124 and 137 degrees F, technical violation issued. Eight (8) resident’s bedrooms had beds, bed linen, chairs, dresser, storage space and sufficient lighting. The facility has sufficient linens, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, facility license, facility sketch, and Ombudsman poster. Food Service: Facility kitchen and dining area are maintained clean. The facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. Sharps and chemicals were kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Continuation on LIC – 809C: Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour/7days a week care staff. Facility staff have current CPR/first aid training. Medical Related Services: Resident’s medications are labeled and centrally stored in a locked cabinet. Record Review: Four (4) Staff files reviewed were observed to be complete. Four (4) Resident files reviewed were observed to be complete. Based on observations and record review technical assistance and violations were issued, but no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report along with LIC 902 was discussed and provided to House Manager Amanda Roberts.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2025
The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 11, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Lora Statler, Facility Representative as was granted access to the facility. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (15) and a current census of (0) residents in care. Facility Representative Statler stated that the facility has not had residents for at least two years. LPA spoke with Administrator, Chris Tanabe, who stated that he wants to keep the facility in operating status although there are no residents in care. LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: LPA observed outdoor frontyard and backyard had overgrown dry shrubs which presents a safety hazards for visitors. LPA spoke with the Administrator who stated that yard maintenance will be conducted at the facility tomorrow. The facility has no pools or other bodies of water. Indoor passageways were free of obstruction. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for the capacity of residents. Bathroom equipment were in operating condition; however, the facility did not ensure the bathrooms hot water temperature attained at a minimum 105 degrees F. The hot water temperature in (6) bathrooms measured between 54 to 55 degrees F. LPA spoke with the Administrator who stated that he would have the utility company check the water heater. LPA observed all bedrooms had no beds and no functioning lights. Although, there are no residents in care, the facility should have at a minimum one completely furnished bedroom for visitor and/or licensing inspection. Care & Supervision: The facility has no staff or residents in care. Record Review: The facility has no staff or residents in care for record review. Medical Related Services: The LPA observed a locked room where medications will be kept. Based on LPA observations, deficiencies are being cited per Title 22, Division 6 of The California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where reports LIC809/LIC809-D/LIC9102 were discussed and copies provided to the facility representative with Appeal Rights at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 11, 2023
The state marks this report as 8 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 5 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Neglect of resident in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegation noted above. LPA met with Lora Statler, House Manager. Administrator Christopher Tanabe was available via telephone. and explained the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation. The allegation was investigated, the investigation consisted of observation, interviews and record review. It was alleged that on or around May 18, 2021, Resident #1 (R1) was neglected by facility staff. R1 was reported to have been observed found with flies on their body, covered in blood, wound dressing missing, dried feces and blood on body, blankets covered in blood, finger covered in blood, eye crusts formed, and disheveled bedding. LPA reviewed resident observation logs dated May 17, 2021, R1 is noted to have had a bed bath, as well as their bedding changed. On May 18, 2021, revealed that R1 would pick the sores and heavily bleed as well as remove the dressing that was located on their right ear. The facility observation log notes that staff had to change, and clean R1 as they were observed to have blood on their fingers that were covered in blood. Further documentation dated May 18, 2021 further Unfounded documentation reviewed revealed staff reporting that R1’s gown and comforter had drops of blood, along with blood being collected on the chuck and soiled dressing on R1’s right ear, and that hospice was contacted to assist and change the dressing. R1 is noted on May 19, 2021, R1 had a visit with from the hospice agency staff who had provided wound care for R1 including have covered the wound on the right ear with a dressing/gauze. Per the facility observation logs 30 minutes after hospice left, R1 was noted to have removed their dressing again. The observation logs notes that facility staff contacted R1’s hospice agency at 12:05pm and was informed that they would send someone out. Facility staff is noted to having called the Administrator as hospice had not shown up as of 2:10pm, also noting that most of the blood was cleaned up. LPA conducted a physical visit to the facility on May 21, 2021. LPA did not observe any flies, in R1s room or flying around the facility. R1 was observed to be sleeping and noted to have clean bedding and clothing. LPA was unable to interview R1, due to them being asleep, and reported to be transitioning. R1 did not wake up at any point, during the time of LPAs visit. Per staff interviews conducted revealed that staff denied the allegation and stated that it has been an ongoing occurrence with R1 picking at their wound and removing the dressing, and that the bedding is changed as often as it is needed, as a result of the wound picking. Based on observation, interviews and record review the allegation of neglect of resident in care is UNFOUNDED. A finding that the complaint is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to Lora Statler, House Manager.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2023 · control 18-AS-20210519091918
20221 state visit · 1 document
Feb 17, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown arrived at the facility 02/17/2022 at 10:00 AM unannounced in order to complete the facility's Annual Inspection. LPA Brown met with House Manager Patricia Roggenbuck and advised of the purpose of the visit, and that the Annual Inspection will be limited to Infection Control only. Administrator Christopher Tanabe was contacted and later arrived during the visit. Below is a summary of what was observed: Infection Control: LPA Brown went over COVID-19 best practices for infection control and prevention with House Manager Roggenbuck and Administrator Tanabe and they reported that Mitigation Plan was submitted January 2021. LPA Brown requested Administrator Tanabe to send a copy of Mitigation Plan via email. LPA Brown observed the facility having Covid-19 signages throughout the facility for proper hand washing procedure, social distancing. LPA Brown toured the inside and outside the facility and observed that there's no resident at the moment but Administrator Tanabe reported that they will have resident soon at the facility. LPA Brown observed resident bedrooms and bathrooms with paper towels and hand soap. LPA Brown requested to inspect the facility's Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supply. LPA Brown observed the facility to have a sufficient supply of sanitizer, gloves, masks, and face shields/goggles or isolation gowns. LPA Brown went over the various recommended training for facility staff with Administrator Tanabe in relation to COVID-19 and informed Administrator Tanabe that once they have residents at the facility, staff needs to be trained on various aspects of infection control, recognition of symptoms of COVID-19, and donning/doffing of PPE. Also, LPA Brown informed Administrator Tanabe that once they'll have residents, all staff need to be fit tested for N95 masks. *** Continuation in LIC809C *** LPA Brown will be providing Administrator Tanabe with the information for Provider Information Notice (PIN) PIN-21-10-ASC which contains resources for getting staff fit tested for N95 masks. The facility has a designated infection control lead person who has been tasked with tracking all COVID-19 cases and/or suspected cases, ensuring PPE supplies are maintained, cleaning and disinfection provisions are in adequate quantities. The facility has a plan in place which follows Community Care Licensing guidelines for when and how long to test staff and their residents for COVID-19, when and how to isolate/quarantine residents, and when to schedule cleaning and disinfection times of high traffic and frequently touched areas. The facility also has a plan in place to monitor their residents regularly for any changes in condition and to subsequently notify the resident's physician and to notify all emergency agencies in the event of any COVID-19 related and/or suspected illnesses. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Christopher Tanabe and a copy of this report (LIC 809) was discussed and provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 17, 2022
20211 state visit · 3 documents
Jul 2, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff stole resident's medications. Staff did not meet incontinence needs of residents.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA George identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation(s) with LPA was greeted and granted entry by Caregiver Cassandra Loe. Administrator Christopher Tanabe arrived shortly after LPA's arrival. Note that the facility is still temporarily closed. The investigation consisted of a review of pertinent documentation and interviews. Allegation: Staff stole resident’s medications. On 10/5/20 LPA conducted an interview with previous Administrator Crystal Green whom did confirm that resident #1 (R1) medication (Hydrocodone-Narcotic) did come up missing. Crystal stated that she does remember seeing the medication sitting on the desk, however the office was being cleaned and there was a bunch of papers and other things that needed to be organized or thrown in the trash. Crystal stated that she Unsubstantiated believes that the medication was tossed in the trash can, however, did not go looking in the dumpster for it to confirm and or to retrieve the medication. LPA interviewed S2 whom denied that they stole the medication. S2 confirmed that yes, they were the one that picked up the medication from the pharmacy and brought it straight back to the facility and placed it on the desk. However they were not able to be located once it came time to do. Administrator Crystal stated that she was going to file a police report but had not done so yet. Based on interviews and record review the allegation of Staff stole resident’s medications is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Allegation: Staff did not meet incontinence needs of residents. LPA conducted interviews and inquired about the resident and incontinent care. It was explained that the residents are checked every two hours, and that as needed if the resident were to inform staff that assistance was needed, by using their call button. The facility does not have a log documenting the times that incontinent care had been provided, but it is a known fact that resident’s need to be checked to ensure that their incontinent needs are being met. LPA conducted resident interviews and the feedback provided was that there are not any issues with their incontinent care and that if they have informed staff that they need to be changed, they will be changed as soon as they are finished completing a task, such as tending to another resident is the only time that they have to wait. Therefore, the allegation of Staff did not meet incontinence needs of residents is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2021 · control 18-AS-20200925153619
Jul 2, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility has rodents. Facility is malodorous.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Caregiver Cassandra Loe. LPA George identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation(s) with Administrator Christopher Tanabe whom arrived a few minutes later after LPA. The investigation consisted of a review of pertinent documentation and interviews. Allegation: Facility has rodents. On 12/14/20 LPA George conducted a tour of the physical plant and observed the following: black box (traps), outside of the facility once inside LPA observed droppings inside the hallway where the backup refrigerator and food is stored. LPA conducted a search inside of the cabinets and did not observe any droppings, however staff was hitting on the cabinets before opening them and stated that, “that is where the rodents (rats, and mice) were”. In addition, LPA reviewed documentation that revealed rodents running around inside * Continued on 9099C Substantiated and outside of the facility. On one occasion there were 5 rats and or mice grabbing food (slice of bread) outside of a black trash bag that was sitting in front of the facility by the gate. LPA interviewed Administrator Christopher whom stated that due to the infestation all the residents had been temporarily relocated to one of the Sister facility Aaspen Village care II #366423704. Based on observation, interview and record review the allegation of Facility has rodents is SUBSTANTIATED. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care. Allegation: Facility is malodorous On 12/14/20 LPA conducted a tour of the physical plant. Upon entry of the facility front door was an overwhelming odor, that is associated with deceased rodents. As a result, all residents had to be temporarily relocated to one of the Sister facility Aaspen Village care II #366423704. Interviews conducted and the feedback provided was the odor is overwhelming unhealthy and can make you sick and that the only reason why staff are still entering the facility is to get food out of the refrigerator. Based on observations and interview the allegation of Facility is malodorous is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. This posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to Administrator Christopher Tanabe.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2021 · control 18-AS-20201210141038
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.269(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 3, 2021
1569.269 Enumerated rights; severability (a) Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following rights: (5) To be accorded safe, healthful, and comfortable accommodations, furnishings, and equipment. Based on observation, interview and record review this requirement is not met as evidenced by: on 1 out of 1 times the resident’s were not accorded safe, healthful, and comfortable accommodations due to the rodent infestation. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2021
Plan of correction: The licensee agrees to have the residents relocated to the sister facility until the infestation has been eliminated. The licensee will also have the exterminator come and treat the facility as they recommend, the licensee will submit copies of the invoices to department by 5pm on the due date indicated.
Jul 2, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility air conditioning is not working.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for the allegation listed above. LPA George identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation(s) with LPA was greeted and granted entry by Caregiver Cassandra Loe. Administrator Christopher Tanabe arrived a few minutes after LPA's arrival. Note that the facility is still temporarily closed. The investigation consisted of a review of pertinent documentation and interviews. Based on observation and interviews LPA was able to corroborate the allegation. LPA interviewed Administrator Tammy Barnett whom stated that “yes the air conditioner was broken”. During the virtual tour conducted on 8/31/20, LPA observed staff fanning themselves with paper due to the air conditioner being broken in the office. In the resident bedrooms. LPA observed standing/floor fans being used as many as to 2 per room. Tammy explained that the electrician had come out on 8/28/20 and stated that he Substantiated needed to order additional parts because the back panel needed to be replaced, after changing all of the vents, the air conditioner has been working inconsistently off and on for about a month or so. Due to the air conditioner malfunctioning, 5 residents were moved rooms. The allegation of Facility air conditioning is not working is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to persons in care. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was provided to Administrator Christopher Tanabe.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2021 · control 18-AS-20200828160829
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(b)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 3, 2021
87303 (b) (1) Maintenance and Operation (b) A comfortable temperature for residents shall be maintained at all times. (2) The facility shall cool rooms to a comfortable range, between 78 degrees F (26 degrees C) and 85 degrees F (30 degrees C), or in areas of extreme heat to 30 degrees F less than the outside temperature. Based on observation, interview and record review this requirement is not met as evidenced by: 1 out of 1 times the facility was not at a comfortable temperature. This poses a potential health and safety risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 2, 2021
Plan of correction: The licensee agrees to have the air conditioner repaired and submit the invoices to the department by 5pm on the due date indicated.
13 of 15 beds were occupied at the May 9, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Mnk Group LLC, licensed since 2009.
Operates 2 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Aaspen Village Care III · Yucca Valley
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2009, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 8
- Total complaints
- 2
- Substantiated allegations
- 0
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 0
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2009, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 0 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 0 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 2 | 1 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 327 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Aaspen Villagecare
Is Aaspen Villagecare licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Aaspen Villagecare licensed for?
15 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Aaspen Villagecare been cited?
0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2009, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Aaspen Villagecare still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Aaspen Villagecare cost?
$4,300 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,350–$5,650. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 23 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 24 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 77 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Bernardino County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,650 to $4,925 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 77 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Aaspen Villagecare take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Mnk Group LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Mnk Group LLC — at least 2 on the state roster.
Can Aaspen Villagecare keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Aaspen Villagecare license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “AASPEN VILLAGECARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #366423788. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 15 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Mnk Group LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2009, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2009, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2009, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2009, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is August 25, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Bernardino County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$3,490 a month to start
Listed by the home on its own website · October 5, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,200–$5,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$3,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,650On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,500On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,100 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,250–$5,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Bernardino County