Small home · Licensed for 6 · Colton
Canyon Hills Care Home
7791 Stewart Road, Colton, CA 92324Licensed since 2006
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 2 residents
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #1. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 2 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Canyon Hills Care Home: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,050a month to start
Likely $3,300–$5,000
From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,050likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,050likely $3,300–$5,000
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,300–$5,200
- $4,050
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,900–$8,450
- $6,550
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes11 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $5,000
11 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,050–$4,250.
- Kwik Board and CareLoma Linda · 2.5 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sarah Jane Guest HomeLoma Linda · 2.6 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Divine Home CareLoma Linda · 2.6 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Birch ResidenceLoma Linda · 2.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- A & K Private Home CareLoma Linda · 2.7 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Silvercare HomesLoma Linda · 2.7 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ctr Home CareLoma Linda · 2.8 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Rest Haven Care HomeLoma Linda · 2.8 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Sunnymead Home CareMoreno Valley · 2.8 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- ExcelcareLoma Linda · 2.9 mi · Mid-size home$4,100Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Golden Guest HomeLoma Linda · 3.0 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
7791 Stewart Road, Colton, CA 92324Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Loma Linda University Medical Center East Campus HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.8 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #366410678 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 5 of 8 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated”.
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not ensure that medication was inaccessible to client
On June 16, 2026, at 10:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano visited the facility to investigate the above-mentioned allegation and deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Meljorie Castelo to discuss the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviewing relevant parties as well as observation. Allegation indicates that facility did not ensure that medication was inaccessible to client - Based on interviews with relevant parties, it was confirmed that Client #1 (C1) transported medication belonging to a caregiver on his wheelchair when he went to the day program. This confirms that the facility failed to ensure the medication remained inaccessible to the client, therefore the allegation is substantiated. Based on interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the allegation is substantiated under the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6 Chapter 8). An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC9099, LIC9099D along with appeal rights, was provided to the Administrator Meljorie Castelo. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260615155154
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(h)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 17, 2026
Title 22, Division 6 Chapter 8 87465 (h(2) Incidental Medical and Dental Care (h)The following requirements shall apply to medications which are centrally stored: (2)Centrally stored medicines shall be kept in a safe and locked place that is not accessible to persons other than employees responsible for the supervision of the centrally stored medication.This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not ensuring that medications are kept safe and in a locked place and not accessible by any residents in care which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 16, 2026
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator agrees to submit a statement of understanding to follow the regulation cited above by plan of correction (POC) due date.
Mar 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 3/26/2026 at 12:55 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Meljorie Castelo and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there were two (2) staff present, and three (3) residents present.. The facility is a four (4) bedrooms, two (2) bathroom home with a kitchen/dining area, living room/activity room. The facility is Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). The facility is licensed for a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory, two (2) hospice care waiver and 1 maybe bedridden resident and the current census is four (4) residents. LPA was accompanied by Staff to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 77 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathroom to be at 111 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Fire extinguishers were also observed at the facility. Posters such as personal rights, the CCLD complaint poster, labor laws, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. ***Continuation in LIC809C *** Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. There is a Medicine cabinet with the resident’s medications locked. LPA observed first aid kit and first aid book at the facility. Food Service: Seven (7) days’ supply of Non-perishable foods and two (2) days’ supply of perishable food supply were observed and sufficient for the number of residents in care. Care & Supervision: The facility has sufficient number of staff to provide care and supervision to the residents in care. Also, LPA observed that the facility does not have dementia residents. Record Review: LPA reviewed three (3) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, Individual Program Plan (IPP), Medications/Medication Administration Record (MAR) were audited. LPA observed that resident #1 (R1) physicians report was not updated. Deficiency issued. LPA observed that resident #1 and resident #2 (R2) do not have an updated IPP. Technical Violation issued. LPA reviewed two (2) staff and administrator files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. LPA observed no issue. Based on the observations and record reviews made during today’s visit, one (1) deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report LIC809, LIC809C,LIC809D, and LIC9102 were discussed and provided to Administrator Meljorie Castelo.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 26, 2026
The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 3/12/2025 at 1:30 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA Serrano met with Caregiver Myrna Sapigao and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there was two (2) staff present, and five (5) residents present. The administrator was out of town and the assistant administrator was not available at the time of the visit. The caregiver is the designated person. The facility is a four (4) bedrooms, two (2) bathroom home with a kitchen/dining area, living room/activity room. The facility is Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). The facility is licensed for a capacity of six (6) non-ambulatory, two (2) hospice care waiver and 1 maybe bedridden resident and the current census is five (5) residents. LPA Serrano was accompanied by Staff to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 70 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA Serrano inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA Serrano measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathroom to be at 105.2 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Fire extinguishers were also observed at the facility. Posters such as personal rights, the CCLD complaint poster, labor laws, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. LPA observed that the facility does not have the Infection Control Plan available for review. Deficiency will be issued ***Continuation in LIC809C *** Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. There is a Medicine cabinet with the resident’s medications locked. LPA Serrano observed first aid kit and first aid book at the facility. Food Service: Seven (7) days’ supply of Non-perishable foods and more than two (2) days’ supply of perishable food supply were observed and sufficient for the number of residents in care. Care & Supervision: The facility has sufficient number of staff to provide care and supervision to the residents in care. Also, LPA Serrano observed that the facility does not have dementia residents. Record Review: LPA Serrano reviewed three (3) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, pre-placement appraisals and needs and services plans. Medications/Medication Administration Record (MAR) were audited. LPA observed that resident #3 (R3) PRN was not properly recorded in the medication administration record (MAR). Deficiency will be issued. LPA Serrano reviewed two (2) staff and administrator files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. LPA observed no issue. Based on the observations and record reviews made during today’s visit, two (2) deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report LIC809, LIC809C, LIC809D forms, and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Caregiver Myrna Sapigao.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025
Feb 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow Emergency Disaster Plan Staff do not have required medication training
On 2/10/2025 at 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano arrived at the facility to investigate a complaint and deliver the findings for the above complaint allegation. Upon arrival, LPA Serrano met with the caregiver Myrna Sapigao and immediately called the Administrator/Licensee Meljorie Castelo who arrived ten (10) minutes later. LPA Serrano informed administrator of the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review, observation and interviews with relevant parties.The department received a complaint on 02/05/2025 regarding the following allegations: #1 Staff did not follow Emergency Disaster Plan. During the interview with the licensee, the licensee stated that they had an emergency shutdown of electricity in the area in which the Southern California Edison (SCE) did not give prior notification for the ouatge on 1/9/2025 which SCE usually do for scheduled outages. ****continue on LIC9099C***** Substantiated Licensee stated that they purchased a portable stove the day after the outage and was not prepared for that emergency outage. Since their water supply is from their own private water well, it needs electricity for it to work. Based on observation, the facility has a 50 gallon water container reserve for washing and hygiene use. Licensee, provided warm food and sandwiches the day of the outage from outside source. They used the portable stove the next day to provide warm food for the residents and to warm the water for daily hygiene for the residents. No residents medication needs refrigeration. Licensee stated that their personal residence is three (3) miles away from the facility and can bring enough supply/items as needed. Upon review of the Emergency Disaster Plan, the allegation corroborates that the licensee did not follow the emergency disaster plan because they have a non-working generator which the licensee stated that they tried to turn on at the time of the power outage but no longer working. That made the facility unprepared for the emergency by not ensuring all the equipment is in working condition. LPA will issue a citation. #2 Staff do not have required medication training. Based on file review of the staff, LPA observed that the medication training was dated on 01/17/2025 for two (2) direct support professional (DSP) Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2). The certificates were not readily available upon the inspection of the reporting party (RP) 01/14/2025 in which the two DSP were already administering medication without the proper training and certification. LPA will issue a citation. Based on LPA's observations and interviews which were conducted and record review(s), the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation(s) is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6 Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC9099, LIC9099C, LIC9099D, and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Licensee Meljorie Castelo. ****This is an amendment to the original LIC9099C****the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 10, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250205094501
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87212(b)(2)(E) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 28, 2025
87212 Emergency Disaster Plan (b) The plan shall be subject to review...(2) Plan for evacuation including:(E) Relocation sites... to provide safe temporary accommodations for residents. This is not met as evidence by: Based on observation, file review and interview the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not ensuring that the facility followed the emergency disaster plan which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 10, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee will submit the statement of understanding to follow 87212(b)(2)(E) regulation regarding emergency disaster plan and the licensee will provide proof of purchase and installation of a new generator for the facility by the plan of correction (POC) due date
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(c)(3)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 12, 2025
87411 Personnel Requirements - General (c) All RCFE staff who assist residents... shall receive initial and annual training...(3)The training shall include, but not be limited to, the following:(D)Policies and procedures regarding medications...This is not met as evidence by: Based on observation, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not ensuring that the staff has the required medication training prior to administreing medication to residents which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 10, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee will submit a statement of understanding of 87411(c)(3)(D) by the POC due date.
20241 state visit · 1 document
Feb 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anna Bueno conducted an unannounced visit to this facility for a required annual inspection. Entry into the facility is unobstructed and LPA met with two facility staff who were informed of the reason for today's visit. Licensee Meljorie Castelo arrived shortly during today's visit. The facility is approved to lock two backyard gates by the Riverside County Fire Department. LPA and staff toured the facility. Physical Plant: The facility is operating within capacity and not beyond the conditions of the license. There are no pools or other bodies of water located on the premises. The facility is being maintained at a comfortable temperature for residents. All passageways are kept free of obstruction. Hot water temperature was measured in five units at and random all measured within regulatory limits. There are grab bars for all toilets and shower used by residents. Fire safety installations such as extinguishers were last inspected on 12/14/23 and fire alarms and carbon monoxide were tested by staff. All units were found to be in working order. Overall the facility is in good condition; it is clean, sanitary and free of foul odors. Kitchen and Food Service: The total daily diet provided to residents appears to be of the quality and in the quantity necessary to meet resident needs. There is a one week supply of nonperishable foods and two days of perishable food items. Plates, cups, and utensils were observed stored in a safe matter. All readily perishable food or beverages capable of micro-organism growth are being stored in covered containers at appropriate temperatures. Refrigerator and freezer are maintained within regulatory temperatures. Medication, Care, and Supervision: The facility has ensured sufficient and competent staff to provide the services needed to meet resident needs. Chemicals and items which can constitute a danger are stored inaccessible to residents. LPA Bueno inspected medications and centralized list. Medications are in their original containers and appear to be dispensed according to physician's orders. Resident and Staff Files: LPA Anna Bueno reviewed a sample of staff and resident files. Staff files had the required documentation including a health screening report and current first aid and/or CPR certification. Resident files had the required documentation including admission's agreement, Individual program plans, and updated physician's reports. Current first Aid/CPR training are on file and training for proper care for restricted health conditions are present. Operations and Administration: Disaster Plan is present. Licensee is present in the facility a sufficient amount of hours and their administrator certification is up to date. The required licensing and ombudsman posters are posted in public view. Residents rights are posted and a copy is kept the resident's file. No deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and provided to Licensee Meljorie Castelo.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2022 · 3 documents
20221 state visit · 1 document
Feb 17, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Anna Bueno and Ryan Gardner made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required annual inspection, with an emphasis on infection control due to the COVID-19 pandemic. LPAs met with staff who confirmed that there are currently no cases/exposures of COVID-19 within the facility. Staff phoned Licensee who arrived during today's visit. LPAs were not screened upon entry into the facility nor asked to use hand sanitizer/hand wash. During the inspection, LPAs conducted a brief tour of the facility and made observations pertaining to the facility's infection control measures. The facility was also equipped with sufficient hand hygiene supplies, sufficient cleaning/disinfecting provisions, and a 30+ day supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The facility has a designated infection control lead person who has been tasked with tracking all COVID-19 cases and/or suspected cases, ensuring PPE supplies are maintained, cleaning and disinfection provisions are in adequate quantities, and that staff are trained in the proper use and disposal of PPE. The facility has a plan in place which follows Community Care Licensing Division guidelines for COVID-19 testing, isolating/quarantining clients, and properly caring for clients with COVID-19 positive results and/or exposures. The facility also has a plan in place to monitor residents regularly for any changes in condition and to subsequently notify the resident's physician and emergency personnel in the event the client presents any COVID-19 symptoms. LPAs observed no health and safety concerns at the time of visit. Based on observations made during today’s inspection, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the ***********************CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C*********************** California Code or Regulations. Technical advisories (TA) were provided for proper visitor screenings ensuring staff are always properly fitted with face coverings. An exit interview was conducted where this report and LIC 9102 (TA) were discussed and a copy of this report was also provided to Licensee at the conclusion of the inspection.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 17, 2022
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20211 state visit · 2 documents
Oct 15, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident was physically abused while in care Facility staff did not ensure resident's personal care needs were met
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Crystal Colvin arrived at the facility to follow up on the complaint investigation with the allegation(s) above. LPA Colvin met with caregiver Shirley Digma and advised of the purpose of today's visit. Below is a summary of the findings of the investigation: Regardign allegation "Resident was physically abused while in care": LPA Colvin reviewed resident's (R1) records and conducted interviews with staff, residents, and outside parties pertinent to R1's care. LPA Colvin was unable to confirm allegation of physical abuse as no evidence was provided of the abuse with the complaint, and LPA Colvin's investigation did not yield any proof of physical abuse either. Additionally, the allegation is in regards to an event that reportedly happened back in 2018. Due to the length of time that has passed between 2018 and the date the allegation was reported, there is little evidence remaining to investigate. Lastly, R1 was unable to be interviewed regarding the allegation as R1 passed away prior to the reporting of this complaint. Therefore, due to lack of evidence, the allegation "Resident was physically abused while in care" is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Unsubstantiated Regarding allegation "Facility staff did not ensure resident's personal care needs were met": LPA Colvin conducted a review of the facility's file for R1 and reviewed outside assessments and reviews for R1, which detailed medical care and appointment dates. The allegation regarding needs not being met is specifically in regards to podiatry care. LPA Colvin reviewed these records for R1 and observed that R1 had a podiatrist which R1 would see every 2-3 months for regular foot care. In review of these records, LPA Colvin confirmed that R1 was seen by their podiatrist at least 11 times between the years of 2017 - 2020. This is close to the estimated 12 times that R1 would be seen if scheduled every 3 months. LPA Colvin did note that there was a gap in care in the beginning of 2018 when R1's insurance had changed. There is documentation which shows that the facility was working with R1's insurance as well as a new podiatrist to get a referral for continued care for R1. Therefore, based on record review, the allegation "Facility staff did not ensure resident's personal care needs were met" is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted with caregiver Shirley Digma and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 15, 2021 · control 18-AS-20210126093050
Oct 15, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Crystal Colvin arrived at the facility unannounced for the purpose of conducting a follow-up visit regarding complaint (#18-AS-20210126093050). LPA Colvin met with Caregiver Shirley DIgma and advised them of the purpose of the visit. During LPA Colvin's visit, LPA Colvin addressed the following issue which was discovered during the investigation: Through LPA Colvin's investigation of the complaint (#18-AS-20210126093050), LPA Colvin observed that one resident (R1) had been admitted to the hospital at least twice in 2020 (11/5/20 for 8 days and 12/5/20 for 7 days). Community Care Licensing (CCL) never received an Incident Report from the facility regarding these hospitalizations. In fact, CCL did not receive any Incident Reports or Death Reports from the facility for a period of over two years (8/7/18 to 1/5/21). All unusual incidents which may pose a risk to a resident's health or safety (such as: calls to 911 or medical emergencies) are to be reported to CCL within 7 calendar days. Deficiency cited. LPA Colvin conducted an exit interview with Caregiver Shirley Digma, and a copy of this report, LIC809D, and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 15, 2021
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 18, 2021
Reporting Requirements: (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency...the following:(1) A written report shall be submitted...within seven days...of any of the events specified ...(D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident... This was not met by: Based on record review, the Licensee did not comply with the above regulation with at least two incidents. LPA Colvin observed that R1 was hospitalized for a week twice in 2020 (11/5/20 & 12/10/20) but the facility never submitted an Incident Report to CCL. This was an immediate personal rights risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 15, 2021
Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to review Title 22 Regulation Section 87211 regarding Reporting Requirements as well as have staff re-trained on reporting requirements. Licensee to submit proof of training as well as Statement of Understanding to LPA Colvin regarding reporting incidents to CCL by Plan of Correction date of 10/18/21.
4 of 6 beds were occupied at the June 16, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
True Care and Compassion Inc., licensed since 2006.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2006, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 8
- Total complaints
- 3
- Substantiated allegations
- 3
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 2
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2006, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 2 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 3 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 3 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Canyon Hills Care Home
Is Canyon Hills Care Home licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Canyon Hills Care Home licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Canyon Hills Care Home been cited?
1 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 8 state visits over the same years.
Is Canyon Hills Care Home still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Canyon Hills Care Home cost?
$4,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,300–$5,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 77 other homes of a similar licensed size across San Bernardino County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,650 to $4,925 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 77 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Canyon Hills Care Home take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by True Care and Compassion Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to True Care and Compassion Inc. — at least 2 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Loma Linda University Medical Center East Campus Hospital is 2.8 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Canyon Hills Care Home keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 2 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Canyon Hills Care Home license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “CANYON HILLS CARE HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #366410678. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to True Care and Compassion Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 8 state inspection visits since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 8 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2006, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is June 16, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in San Bernardino County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$3,800 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,200 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,200 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,150On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,000 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,150–$4,800On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,250On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore San Bernardino County