Aqua Ridge Of Montclair is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Montclair, San Bernardino County, California — state license #361881048, licensed for 150 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 23 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 4, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

5 homes in view

Aqua Ridge Of Montclair

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 150 residents · Montclair, CA · San Bernardino County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #361881048, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
9631 Monte Vista Ave · Montclair, San Bernardino County
Phone
(909) 483-2782
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 150 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 150 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 12 MAYBE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15. BEDRIDDEN WILL BE ON 1ST FLOOR ONLY.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 27 times and filed 23 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 4, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
July 2, 2026
Occupancy at the May 4, 2026 visit
88 of 150 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 15 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 7, 2023 to May 4, 2026. 15 of the 15 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (10). 15 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 15 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 19 of 23 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 5 documents
May 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Prieto met with Barrera and explained the elements of the complaint. LPA toured the Assisted Living area, dinning room, library and other common areas. LPA also toured the facility Memory Care Unit ward and found all to be clean, sanitary and in good repair. LPA did not observe any unsafe environmental conditions that may pose a risk to resident's safety. Based on the information obtained there is not enough evidence that the facility is in disrepair. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. This report signed by LPA Prieto and Mr Barrera and a copy was left with the facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 4, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260416143854
Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained 1st and 2nd degree burns due to lack of supervision

On 04/29/2026 at 9:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Eldin Serrano, visited the facility to deliver the investigative findings for the above allegation. LPA Serrano identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Monique Del Junco. Allegation: – Resident sustained 1st and 2nd degree burns due to lack of supervision It was alleged that resident #1 (R1) sustained first and second-degree burns due to lack of supervision by facility staff. The Department investigation consisted of review of facility records, hospital records, and police reports, as well as interviews with outside parties. The Department was unable to interview R1. Medical records reviewed during the investigation indicated no signs or symptoms of abuse. The hospital discharge diagnosis identified the resident’s condition as a first-degree sunburn to the bilateral lower extremities with cellulitis, along with leg pain and swelling. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 56-AS-20250917164528
Apr 29, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Questionable Death. Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision -Resident developed pressure injury while in care due to staff neglect. Facility charged resident for a service they did not receive.

On 04/29/2026 at 9:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Eldin Serrano, visited the facility to deliver the investigative findings for the above allegations. LPA Serrano identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Monique Del Junco. The Department investigated the above allegations, which included a review of facility records, medical documentation, and interviews with relevant parties. Allegation: Questionable Death It was alleged that facility staff mishandled Resident #1 (R1’s) medical emergency on 08/09/2025 after he reported feeling a pill stuck in his throat. It was alleged that staff provided inappropriate care, failed to recognize the severity of the condition, and delayed calling 911, resulting in the resident’s death. Records reviewed, including facility files and medical documentation, indicate that staff followed R1’s treatment orders and monitored their condition. Documentation shows that staff remained with R1, observed changes in cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2026 · control 56-AS-20250819104741
Apr 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are withholding resident's medication

On 4/16/2026 at 8:50 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate and deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA met with executive director Monique Del Junco to explain the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with facility staff and resident as well as facility observation. Allegation: Staff are withholding resident's medication – Based on record review and interview with resident# 1(R1) and staff. It was revealed that facility doesn’t have any medication to administer to R1 because the pharmacy has not refiled R1’s medication for nonpayment from the healthcare provider. The staff offered to send R1 to the hospital to get temporary supply of medication until the resident can sort out the medical insurance issue but R1 refused because R1 thought R1 has to pay money to the hospital. LPA was unable to corroborate the allegation. Based on the evidence, the allegation mentioned abothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260413162054
Mar 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not accord resident privacy.

On March 9, 2026 at 8:55AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Eldin Serrano visited the facility to investigate the above-mentioned allegation and deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Monique Del Junco to discuss the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviewing relevant parties as well as observation. The allegation indicates that staff does not accord resident privacy. – Based on interviews with relevant parties and observation, it was confirmed that client #1 (C1) has a camera on C1’s room that record video and audio. Audio recording is prohibited by regulation. By allowing the camera’s audio function, the facility violated the resident’s right to personal privacy. Based on interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the allegations are substantiated under the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6 Chapter 8). An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC9099, LIC9099D along with appeal rithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 9, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260226100831
20257 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide adequate care and supervision to the residents. Staff do not keep the facility free from bugs. Staff do not properly maintain the facility. Staff are not properly trained.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Facility Resident Services Director Jonnathan Rios and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegations listed above. First allegation: Staff do not provide adequate care and supervision to the residents. Regarding the allegation stated above LPA conducted a walkthrough of the facility memory care unit (MC), LPA inspected 13 out of 15 rooms during the inspection LPA observed a mattress to be soiled with feces along with urine. LPA conducted an interview with S#1 regarding the condition of resident’s mattress. S#1 informed LPA that R#1 still utilizes the mattress under its condition. In addition, S#1 informed LPA that family provides the mattress and family is aware of the condition of the mattress. LPA conducted a record review of R#1 physician’s report during record review LPA discovered based on Resident #1 Physical Health Status that R#1 does not have athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240815093125
Oct 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not properly safeguard the facility grounds Staff do not ensure the residents are being changed Staff are mishandling the residents medications Staff do not meet the minimum qualifications required Staff are not properly trained Staff are not following proper food handling techniques Staff do not provide adequate care and supervision Staff do not meet the residents bathing needs Staff do not keep the facility free from infestation

On 10/02/2025 at 2:45 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate and deliver the findings of the above allegations. LPA Serrano met with Resident Care Director Jonnathan Rios to explain the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with facility staff and residents as well as facility observation. Allegation #1: Staff do not properly safeguard the facility grounds – Based on LPA's observation and upon touring of the facility, LPA did not find any evidence of broken windows for the alleged multiple break-ins at the facility. The facility is in good repair and has found no issues. Allegation #2: Staff do not ensure the residents are being changed - Based on interviews with staff and residents, it was revealed that the residents’ diapers were being changed as needed. It was also revealed that if the residents are independent and if they need assistance with changing their diapers the staff ithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250904133849
Oct 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff do not administer resident's medications as prescribed.

On 6/18/2025 at 1:05 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegations. LPA Serrano met with Executive Director Monique Del Junco to explain the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with facility staffs and residents as well as facility observation. Allegation: Staff do not administer resident's medications as prescribed. – Based on interview and record review, 4 out 4 residents and 2 out 2 staff stated that the residents medication were administered as prescribed. Resident #1 (R1) stated that R1's medication is administered as prescribed. R1 just want a copy of her medication list. Information received during investigation did not corroborate with the allegation. During the investigation, LPA did not find evidence to corroborate the allegations. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250617170110
Apr 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident's medication was not administered

On 04/11/2025 at 1:00PM Licensing Program Analyst, Renese Howell-Small, (LPA) arrived at the Aqua Ridge of Montclair unannounced to deliver findings for the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Monique Del Junco; introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and record review. The fourth allegation alleged that the resident’s medication was not administered. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 04/01/2022 indicates that the water pill was a PRN and to be given once daily as needed for edema. According to the MAR, the resident was given the water pill on 04/24/2022 to 04/27/2022 at 8:00AM. The Physician’s Order indicates that the water pill was to be given every morning with a start date of 04/01/2022. The Administrator could not provide further documentation to support that the water pill was to be given as a PRN. Based upon interviews and record review, this allegation is SUBSTANthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 11, 2025 · control 56-AS-20220425105127
Jan 30, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not answer residents calls for assistance timely

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived at the facility to investigate the complaint mentioned above. LPA Prieto met with Executive Director Del Junco and explained the details of the complaint. Regarding the allegation that staff do not answer residents' calls for assistance in a timely manner, LPA Prieto toured the Memory Care Unit, the ward relevant to this complaint, and reviewed recent pull cord call records. The records show that the average response time to pull cord calls is 7 minutes. The ward is adequately staffed, with a 3 to 1 ratio of caregivers to the 24 residents. LPA Prieto observed residents grouped together to ensure better monitoring. All residents receive care from medical technicians three times a day and have individualized care plans that address continence care, bathing, and room cleaning. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 30, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250124135935
Jan 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff caused injury to resident in care Staff did not ensure resident's room was kept clean Staff falsified resident records Staff consume alcohol while on shift

On 1/03/2024 at 10:35 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Monique Del Junco and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file reviews, interviews with facility staffs and residents as well as observation. Allegation: Staff caused injury to resident in care. Based on interviews conducted with 7 out of 7 residents and 7 out 7 staff all stated that they have not witness/observed or have knowledge of any staff causing injury to residents in care. Interviews with 3 out 7 residents stated that they are being taken care of and the staff are very kind and nice to them. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2025 · control 56-AS-20241213123255
20243 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not respond to requests for assistance in a timely manner. Licensee is not ensuring that the facility has enough staff to meet the care needs of residents in care.

On November 8, 2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Eldin Serrano and Sarina Ramirez visited the facility to investigate the mentioned allegations and deliver findings. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Monique Del Junco to discuss the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of reviewing of files and interviewing relevant parties. The first allegation indicates that Staff do not respond to requests for assistance in a timely manner. Interviews with 5 residents revealed that more staff are needed because the response time was inconsistent. Interviews with five staff members revealed that more staff are needed, especially during the night shift and weekends. Staff mentioned that response times vary based on the need and if they are assisting residents who require more help. Staff also mentioned that when they are busy, response times can range from 30 to 45 minutes, which poses a health and safety risk to residents in care. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 8, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240910171129
Nov 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow medication orders as prescribed Due to staff neglect, resident developed a pressure injury Staff did not ensure residents room was clean Staff did not ensure residents hygiene needs were met Staff did not ensure residents laundry was done timely Due to lack of staff, medications were not administered timely

On 11/08/2024 at 09:00 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Eldin Serrano and Sarina Ramirez made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPAs met with Executive Director Monique Del Junco and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file reviews, interviews with facility staffs and residents as well as observation. Allegation: Staff did not follow medication orders as prescribed. Based on interviews conducted with 3 out of 5 residents they all stated that their medications are given as prescribed. Two (2) of the 5 residents were nonverbal and unable to communicate. Five staff persons were interviewed and 4 out of 5 reported that the medications are given as prescribed. One (1) staff person reported not having knowledge if medication was given as prescribed as they do not handle medications. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 8, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240910102504
Nov 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 10, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not allow residents to have visitors.

On 06/10/2024 at 09:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown made an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation as well as to deliver findings for the allegation listed above. LPA Brown met with Resident Care Director Jonathan Rios. Executive Director (ED) Monique del Junco was contacted and arrived during the visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with staffs, and residents as well as observation. The investigation was conducted by LPA Melody Brown. The investigation consisted of file review, observation and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation indicates Staff do not allow residents to have visitors. Based on interviews, observations and records review conducted, LPA Brown cannot find evidence to corroborate the allegation. Interviews with eight (8) of eight (8) residents indicated that staffs at the facility are allowing them to have visitors all the time and there's no incident at the facility that a staff did not allow resithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 10, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240603083339
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations7typical 1
Substantiated complaints10typical 2
Total complaints15typical 7
State visits on file27typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202645120257822024351202333020221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (909) 483-2782

Is Aqua Ridge Of Montclair licensed?

Yes — Aqua Ridge Of Montclair is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Montclair (San Bernardino County): California license #361881048, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 150 residents. State records list 23 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 4, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Aqua Ridge Of Montclair care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Aqua Ridge Of Montclair with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 150 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 12 MAYBE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15. BEDRIDDEN WILL BE ON 1ST FLOOR ONLY.

How much does Aqua Ridge Of Montclair cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Aqua Ridge Of Montclair's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Aqua Ridge Of Montclair accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Aqua Ridge Of Montclair through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Bernardino County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

88 of 150 beds occupied (59%) when the state visited on May 4, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Aqua Ridge Of Montclair?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 27 state visits and 23 dated documents since 2021 for Aqua Ridge Of Montclair; 15 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 4, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

15 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Prieto met with Barrera and explained the elements of the complaint. LPA toured the Assisted Living area, dinning room, library and other common areas. LPA also toured the facility Memory Care Unit ward and found all to be clean, sanitary and in good repair. LPA did not observe any unsafe environmental conditions that may pose a risk to resident's safety. Based on the information obtained there is not enough evidence that the facility is in disrepair. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. This report signed by LPA Prieto and Mr Barrera and a copy was left with the facility. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 4, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260416143854
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained 1st and 2nd degree burns due to lack of supervision
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 04/29/2026 at 9:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Eldin Serrano, visited the facility to deliver the investigative findings for the above allegation. LPA Serrano identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Monique Del Junco. Allegation: – Resident sustained 1st and 2nd degree burns due to lack of supervision It was alleged that resident #1 (R1) sustained first and second-degree burns due to lack of supervision by facility staff. The Department investigation consisted of review of facility records, hospital records, and police reports, as well as interviews with outside parties. The Department was unable to interview R1. Medical records reviewed during the investigation indicated no signs or symptoms of abuse. The hospital discharge diagnosis identified the resident’s condition as a first-degree sunburn to the bilateral lower extremities with cellulitis, along with leg pain and swelling. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficiCDSS inspection report, April 29, 2026 · control 56-AS-20250917164528
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedQuestionable Death. Neglect/Lack of Care and Supervision -Resident developed pressure injury while in care due to staff neglect. Facility charged resident for a service they did not receive.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 04/29/2026 at 9:15 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Eldin Serrano, visited the facility to deliver the investigative findings for the above allegations. LPA Serrano identified himself and discussed the purpose of the visit with Executive Director Monique Del Junco. The Department investigated the above allegations, which included a review of facility records, medical documentation, and interviews with relevant parties. Allegation: Questionable Death It was alleged that facility staff mishandled Resident #1 (R1’s) medical emergency on 08/09/2025 after he reported feeling a pill stuck in his throat. It was alleged that staff provided inappropriate care, failed to recognize the severity of the condition, and delayed calling 911, resulting in the resident’s death. Records reviewed, including facility files and medical documentation, indicate that staff followed R1’s treatment orders and monitored their condition. Documentation shows that staff remained with R1, observed changes in cCDSS inspection report, April 29, 2026 · control 56-AS-20250819104741
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are withholding resident's medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 4/16/2026 at 8:50 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate and deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA met with executive director Monique Del Junco to explain the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with facility staff and resident as well as facility observation. Allegation: Staff are withholding resident's medication – Based on record review and interview with resident# 1(R1) and staff. It was revealed that facility doesn’t have any medication to administer to R1 because the pharmacy has not refiled R1’s medication for nonpayment from the healthcare provider. The staff offered to send R1 to the hospital to get temporary supply of medication until the resident can sort out the medical insurance issue but R1 refused because R1 thought R1 has to pay money to the hospital. LPA was unable to corroborate the allegation. Based on the evidence, the allegation mentioned aboCDSS inspection report, April 16, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260413162054
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not accord resident privacy.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On March 9, 2026 at 8:55AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Eldin Serrano visited the facility to investigate the above-mentioned allegation and deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Monique Del Junco to discuss the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviewing relevant parties as well as observation. The allegation indicates that staff does not accord resident privacy. – Based on interviews with relevant parties and observation, it was confirmed that client #1 (C1) has a camera on C1’s room that record video and audio. Audio recording is prohibited by regulation. By allowing the camera’s audio function, the facility violated the resident’s right to personal privacy. Based on interviews, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore, the allegations are substantiated under the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6 Chapter 8). An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC9099, LIC9099D along with appeal riCDSS inspection report, March 9, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260226100831

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide adequate care and supervision to the residents. Staff do not keep the facility free from bugs. Staff do not properly maintain the facility. Staff are not properly trained.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Paola Guerrero arrived at the facility to deliver investigative findings. LPA met with Facility Resident Services Director Jonnathan Rios and explained the purpose of the visit regarding the allegations listed above. First allegation: Staff do not provide adequate care and supervision to the residents. Regarding the allegation stated above LPA conducted a walkthrough of the facility memory care unit (MC), LPA inspected 13 out of 15 rooms during the inspection LPA observed a mattress to be soiled with feces along with urine. LPA conducted an interview with S#1 regarding the condition of resident’s mattress. S#1 informed LPA that R#1 still utilizes the mattress under its condition. In addition, S#1 informed LPA that family provides the mattress and family is aware of the condition of the mattress. LPA conducted a record review of R#1 physician’s report during record review LPA discovered based on Resident #1 Physical Health Status that R#1 does not have aCDSS inspection report, December 16, 2025 · control 56-AS-20240815093125
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not properly safeguard the facility grounds Staff do not ensure the residents are being changed Staff are mishandling the residents medications Staff do not meet the minimum qualifications required Staff are not properly trained Staff are not following proper food handling techniques Staff do not provide adequate care and supervision Staff do not meet the residents bathing needs Staff do not keep the facility free from infestation
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/02/2025 at 2:45 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate and deliver the findings of the above allegations. LPA Serrano met with Resident Care Director Jonnathan Rios to explain the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with facility staff and residents as well as facility observation. Allegation #1: Staff do not properly safeguard the facility grounds – Based on LPA's observation and upon touring of the facility, LPA did not find any evidence of broken windows for the alleged multiple break-ins at the facility. The facility is in good repair and has found no issues. Allegation #2: Staff do not ensure the residents are being changed - Based on interviews with staff and residents, it was revealed that the residents’ diapers were being changed as needed. It was also revealed that if the residents are independent and if they need assistance with changing their diapers the staff iCDSS inspection report, October 2, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250904133849
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not administer resident's medications as prescribed.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 6/18/2025 at 1:05 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegations. LPA Serrano met with Executive Director Monique Del Junco to explain the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with facility staffs and residents as well as facility observation. Allegation: Staff do not administer resident's medications as prescribed. – Based on interview and record review, 4 out 4 residents and 2 out 2 staff stated that the residents medication were administered as prescribed. Resident #1 (R1) stated that R1's medication is administered as prescribed. R1 just want a copy of her medication list. Information received during investigation did not corroborate with the allegation. During the investigation, LPA did not find evidence to corroborate the allegations. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, June 18, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250617170110
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's medication was not administered
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 04/11/2025 at 1:00PM Licensing Program Analyst, Renese Howell-Small, (LPA) arrived at the Aqua Ridge of Montclair unannounced to deliver findings for the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Monique Del Junco; introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and record review. The fourth allegation alleged that the resident’s medication was not administered. The Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated 04/01/2022 indicates that the water pill was a PRN and to be given once daily as needed for edema. According to the MAR, the resident was given the water pill on 04/24/2022 to 04/27/2022 at 8:00AM. The Physician’s Order indicates that the water pill was to be given every morning with a start date of 04/01/2022. The Administrator could not provide further documentation to support that the water pill was to be given as a PRN. Based upon interviews and record review, this allegation is SUBSTANCDSS inspection report, April 11, 2025 · control 56-AS-20220425105127
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not answer residents calls for assistance timely
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived at the facility to investigate the complaint mentioned above. LPA Prieto met with Executive Director Del Junco and explained the details of the complaint. Regarding the allegation that staff do not answer residents' calls for assistance in a timely manner, LPA Prieto toured the Memory Care Unit, the ward relevant to this complaint, and reviewed recent pull cord call records. The records show that the average response time to pull cord calls is 7 minutes. The ward is adequately staffed, with a 3 to 1 ratio of caregivers to the 24 residents. LPA Prieto observed residents grouped together to ensure better monitoring. All residents receive care from medical technicians three times a day and have individualized care plans that address continence care, bathing, and room cleaning. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 30, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250124135935
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff caused injury to resident in care Staff did not ensure resident's room was kept clean Staff falsified resident records Staff consume alcohol while on shift
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 1/03/2024 at 10:35 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eldin Serrano made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPA met with Executive Director Monique Del Junco and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file reviews, interviews with facility staffs and residents as well as observation. Allegation: Staff caused injury to resident in care. Based on interviews conducted with 7 out of 7 residents and 7 out 7 staff all stated that they have not witness/observed or have knowledge of any staff causing injury to residents in care. Interviews with 3 out 7 residents stated that they are being taken care of and the staff are very kind and nice to them. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 3, 2025 · control 56-AS-20241213123255

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not respond to requests for assistance in a timely manner. Licensee is not ensuring that the facility has enough staff to meet the care needs of residents in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On November 8, 2024, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Eldin Serrano and Sarina Ramirez visited the facility to investigate the mentioned allegations and deliver findings. LPA met with Executive Director (ED) Monique Del Junco to discuss the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of reviewing of files and interviewing relevant parties. The first allegation indicates that Staff do not respond to requests for assistance in a timely manner. Interviews with 5 residents revealed that more staff are needed because the response time was inconsistent. Interviews with five staff members revealed that more staff are needed, especially during the night shift and weekends. Staff mentioned that response times vary based on the need and if they are assisting residents who require more help. Staff also mentioned that when they are busy, response times can range from 30 to 45 minutes, which poses a health and safety risk to residents in care. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 8, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240910171129
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not follow medication orders as prescribed Due to staff neglect, resident developed a pressure injury Staff did not ensure residents room was clean Staff did not ensure residents hygiene needs were met Staff did not ensure residents laundry was done timely Due to lack of staff, medications were not administered timely
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 11/08/2024 at 09:00 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Eldin Serrano and Sarina Ramirez made an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver the findings of the above allegation. LPAs met with Executive Director Monique Del Junco and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file reviews, interviews with facility staffs and residents as well as observation. Allegation: Staff did not follow medication orders as prescribed. Based on interviews conducted with 3 out of 5 residents they all stated that their medications are given as prescribed. Two (2) of the 5 residents were nonverbal and unable to communicate. Five staff persons were interviewed and 4 out of 5 reported that the medications are given as prescribed. One (1) staff person reported not having knowledge if medication was given as prescribed as they do not handle medications. *** Continuation in LIC9099C *** UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 8, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240910102504
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not allow residents to have visitors.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 06/10/2024 at 09:00 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown made an unannounced visit to commence a complaint investigation as well as to deliver findings for the allegation listed above. LPA Brown met with Resident Care Director Jonathan Rios. Executive Director (ED) Monique del Junco was contacted and arrived during the visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with staffs, and residents as well as observation. The investigation was conducted by LPA Melody Brown. The investigation consisted of file review, observation and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation indicates Staff do not allow residents to have visitors. Based on interviews, observations and records review conducted, LPA Brown cannot find evidence to corroborate the allegation. Interviews with eight (8) of eight (8) residents indicated that staffs at the facility are allowing them to have visitors all the time and there's no incident at the facility that a staff did not allow resiCDSS inspection report, June 10, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240603083339

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 27 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
10
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
15
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
27
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(909) 483-2782
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Aqua Ridge Of Montclair? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.