Montclair Royale Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Montclair, San Bernardino County, California — state license #361800147, licensed for 236 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 67 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2020, the most recent dated May 5, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

5 homes in view

Montclair Royale Senior Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 236 residents · Montclair, CA · San Bernardino County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #361800147, held since 2017 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
9685 Monte Vista Ave · Montclair, San Bernardino County
Phone
(909) 621-3545
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 150 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 15 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 86 AMBULATORY 150 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2020, the state has visited this home 83 times and filed 67 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated May 5, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 16, 2026
Occupancy at the October 16, 2023 visit
125 of 236 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 25 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 31, 2020 to October 16, 2023. 25 of the 25 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (8), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (16). 25 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 25 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 39 of 67 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 6 documents
May 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20257 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 8, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 21, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202312 state visits · 21 documents
Dec 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 17, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 16, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure resident has access to resident's wheelchair. Staff does not ensure resident's room is clean and sanitary. Staff does not ensure resident's call light works.

Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) made an unannounced visit to the Monclair Royale Senior Living Facility to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation. LPA met with Care Coordinator, Araceli Soto and stated the purpose of the visit. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, a review of records and observations. It is alleged that staff does not ensure the resident has access to the resident’s wheelchair. Staff interviews revealed that R3’s wheelchair is kept in R3’s closet for the purposes of safety. During LPA’s visit, LPA made observation of R3’s room. LPA observed the wheelchair inside of the room outside of the closet. LPA accessed the wheelchair, opened it, pushed it, opened the foot pedals. The wheelchair appeared to be functional and in good repair. All staff report R3 has the ability to walk on their own on the floor. Photographic evidence depicted a wheelchair next to the resident’s bed, giving the resident access to the wheelchairthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230503082338
Oct 16, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained an unexplained injury while in care of the facility. Resident wandered away from the facility due to staff neglect. Staff do not provide residents with daily activities. Staff do not provide accurate information needed to ensure resident is receiving appropriate care

Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) arrived at the Montclair Royale unannounced to deliver findings of the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA introduced self and stated the purpose of the visit then discussed the findings. It is alleged that a resident sustained an unexplained injury while in care of the facility. Staff interviews revealed that R1 was scheduled for a dentist appointment at 8:30am. R1 had breakfast and left the facility at 6:40am via Innovage/PACE Transportation. Staff of Montclair Royale deny the incident occurred at the facility; reporting that no injuries were observed on R1 when she left for her appointment. Staff of Innovage reported that residents who arrive early to their appointments often wait at the Innovage Center in a courtyard unattended. It is unclear whether the lip injury occurred during her dentist appointment or possibly during her time in the courtyard at Innovage. Innovage staff investigated the matter and suggthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230629154129
Oct 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 13, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 31, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not meeting resident's dietary needs.

Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) arrived at the Montclair Royale Senior Living Facility unannounced to initiate a complaint investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Care Coordinator, Araceli Soto to discuss elements of the complaint. During today's visit, LPA interviewed staff and residents, collected pertinent documents and completed a walk through of the resident's room. It is alleged that staff are not meeting resident's dietary needs. Staff interviews revealed that the resident eats all of her meals. Facility staff do not maintain weight records for residents. Record reviews revealed that the resident's dietary needs are being met. Residents deny that they do not get enough food to eat. Residents also deny their dietary needs are not met. Based on information above, these allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 31, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230825163400
Aug 31, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 31, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 31, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 31, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident is being physically attacked by another resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) arrived at the Montclair Royale unannounced to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation. LPA met with Araceli Soto, Care Coordinator to discuss elements of the complaint allegations. It is alleged that Resident is being physically attacked by another resident in care. Staff interviewed denied the incident happened. LPA observed resident notes dated 07/01/23 that state R1 was bit by R2. Based on LPA observation, the allegation resident is being physically attacked by another resident in care is substantiated. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 28, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230727151227
Aug 23, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff abandoned resident at a mental health facility.

Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) arrived at the Montclair Royale Senior Living Facility to unannounced to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation. LPA met with Care Coordinator Assistant, Gwen Galvan to discuss findings. It is alleged that the staff abandoned resident at a mental health facility. Staff interviews revealed that a resident in care began experiencing an increase in negative behaviors toward staff and residents. Medication Technicians and Administrative Staff worked within the resident's support system to make arrangements to get the resident psychiatric assistance. Included with arrangements was transportation of the resident. Record reviews indicated that the resident's admission to another facility was confirmed before the resident was transported out of the facility. Staff at the accepting facility were aware of the resident's incoming admission to their facility. Please see LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 23, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230622102617
Aug 23, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 22, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is allowing resident leave the facility without staff supervision.

Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) arrived at the Montclair Royale Senior Living Facility unannounced to initiate a complaint allegation into the allegations listed above. LPA approached the front desk, introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. Staff informed LPA that the Administrator and Care Coordinator are out for the day, but Care Coordinator Assistant, Gwen Galvan, (GG) offered to assist LPA. LPA and GG met and discussed the complaint. Today's visit included a walk through of the facility, staff and resident interviews, file review and collection of pertinent documents. It is alleged that staff is allowing resident to leave the facility without staff supervision. LPA interviewed staff and resident. Interviews revealed that R1 can leave the facility on their own. LPA conducted a file review and observed the resident's most recent Physician’s Report which indicates the resident can leave the facility without supervision. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230818143744
Aug 22, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not assure resident have hot water to shower. Resident's roof is in disrepair.

Licesning Program Analyst, Amber Coleman arrived at the Montclair Royale Senior Living Facility to unnannounced to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. LPA met with Administrator, AnnaMarie Santos, to discuss elements of the complaint. It is alleged that facility staff did not insure residents had hot water to shower. During staff interviews, LPA learned that the facility's boiler stopped working properly between 1/30/23 and 2/3/23. Maintenance staff examined the boiler and determined a part was required in order to fix it. Receipts from Ferguson Enterprises indicate, new part was ordered on 2/4/23, picked up on 2/5/23 and the facility boiler was fixed by 2/6/23 restoring hot water to the facility. It is alleged that the resident's room is in disrepair. Resident and staff members statements were consistent. The resident's room had a water leak in the ceiling. LPA also observed evidence of a water leak on the resident'the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230206124429
Aug 22, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from being a victim of financial abuse by an unknown perpetrator. Staff did not dispense resident's medication as prescribed Medication was falsely recorded as being refused by resident

Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman (LPA) arrived to the Montclair Royale Senior Living unannounced to initiate a complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. LPA met with Care Coordinator Assistant, Gwen Galvan to discuss elements of the allegations.During today's visit, LPA conducted staff and resident interviews, a walk through of the facility and collection of pertinent documents. It is alleged that staff did not prevent resident from being a victim by an unknown perpetrator. During interview, with R1, it was reported that R1 put a large sum of cash in her nightstand; approximatley, $700. This was reported to staff who contacted Law Enforcement for assistance. Staff interviews revealed that this incident occured in December 2022. The Montclair Police Department was contacted and made a visit to the facility. Police determined there was not enough evidence to make a report or pursue the theft. Please see LIC9099the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230818153950
Aug 17, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations10typical 1
Type B citations11typical 1
Substantiated complaints22typical 2
Total complaints45typical 7
State visits on file83typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2017.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202646020257802024440202323354202259320214502020111
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (909) 621-3545

Is Montclair Royale Senior Living licensed?

Yes — Montclair Royale Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Montclair (San Bernardino County): California license #361800147, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 236 residents. State records list 67 inspection and complaint documents since 2020; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 5, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Montclair Royale Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Montclair Royale Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 86 AMBULATORY 150 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15.

How much does Montclair Royale Senior Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Montclair Royale Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Montclair Royale Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Montclair Royale Senior Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in San Bernardino County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

125 of 236 beds occupied (53%) when the state visited on October 16, 2023. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Montclair Royale Senior Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 83 state visits and 67 dated documents since 2020 for Montclair Royale Senior Living; 25 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 16, 2023, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

25 transcribed reports on file

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure resident has access to resident's wheelchair. Staff does not ensure resident's room is clean and sanitary. Staff does not ensure resident's call light works.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) made an unannounced visit to the Monclair Royale Senior Living Facility to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation. LPA met with Care Coordinator, Araceli Soto and stated the purpose of the visit. The investigation included interviews with staff and residents, a review of records and observations. It is alleged that staff does not ensure the resident has access to the resident’s wheelchair. Staff interviews revealed that R3’s wheelchair is kept in R3’s closet for the purposes of safety. During LPA’s visit, LPA made observation of R3’s room. LPA observed the wheelchair inside of the room outside of the closet. LPA accessed the wheelchair, opened it, pushed it, opened the foot pedals. The wheelchair appeared to be functional and in good repair. All staff report R3 has the ability to walk on their own on the floor. Photographic evidence depicted a wheelchair next to the resident’s bed, giving the resident access to the wheelchairCDSS inspection report, October 16, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230503082338
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained an unexplained injury while in care of the facility. Resident wandered away from the facility due to staff neglect. Staff do not provide residents with daily activities. Staff do not provide accurate information needed to ensure resident is receiving appropriate care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) arrived at the Montclair Royale unannounced to deliver findings of the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA introduced self and stated the purpose of the visit then discussed the findings. It is alleged that a resident sustained an unexplained injury while in care of the facility. Staff interviews revealed that R1 was scheduled for a dentist appointment at 8:30am. R1 had breakfast and left the facility at 6:40am via Innovage/PACE Transportation. Staff of Montclair Royale deny the incident occurred at the facility; reporting that no injuries were observed on R1 when she left for her appointment. Staff of Innovage reported that residents who arrive early to their appointments often wait at the Innovage Center in a courtyard unattended. It is unclear whether the lip injury occurred during her dentist appointment or possibly during her time in the courtyard at Innovage. Innovage staff investigated the matter and suggCDSS inspection report, October 5, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230629154129
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not meeting resident's dietary needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) arrived at the Montclair Royale Senior Living Facility unannounced to initiate a complaint investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA met with Care Coordinator, Araceli Soto to discuss elements of the complaint. During today's visit, LPA interviewed staff and residents, collected pertinent documents and completed a walk through of the resident's room. It is alleged that staff are not meeting resident's dietary needs. Staff interviews revealed that the resident eats all of her meals. Facility staff do not maintain weight records for residents. Record reviews revealed that the resident's dietary needs are being met. Residents deny that they do not get enough food to eat. Residents also deny their dietary needs are not met. Based on information above, these allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding of UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the aCDSS inspection report, August 31, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230825163400
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is being physically attacked by another resident in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) arrived at the Montclair Royale unannounced to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation. LPA met with Araceli Soto, Care Coordinator to discuss elements of the complaint allegations. It is alleged that Resident is being physically attacked by another resident in care. Staff interviewed denied the incident happened. LPA observed resident notes dated 07/01/23 that state R1 was bit by R2. Based on LPA observation, the allegation resident is being physically attacked by another resident in care is substantiated. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 28, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230727151227
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff abandoned resident at a mental health facility.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) arrived at the Montclair Royale Senior Living Facility to unannounced to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation. LPA met with Care Coordinator Assistant, Gwen Galvan to discuss findings. It is alleged that the staff abandoned resident at a mental health facility. Staff interviews revealed that a resident in care began experiencing an increase in negative behaviors toward staff and residents. Medication Technicians and Administrative Staff worked within the resident's support system to make arrangements to get the resident psychiatric assistance. Included with arrangements was transportation of the resident. Record reviews indicated that the resident's admission to another facility was confirmed before the resident was transported out of the facility. Staff at the accepting facility were aware of the resident's incoming admission to their facility. Please see LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 23, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230622102617
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is allowing resident leave the facility without staff supervision.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) arrived at the Montclair Royale Senior Living Facility unannounced to initiate a complaint allegation into the allegations listed above. LPA approached the front desk, introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. Staff informed LPA that the Administrator and Care Coordinator are out for the day, but Care Coordinator Assistant, Gwen Galvan, (GG) offered to assist LPA. LPA and GG met and discussed the complaint. Today's visit included a walk through of the facility, staff and resident interviews, file review and collection of pertinent documents. It is alleged that staff is allowing resident to leave the facility without staff supervision. LPA interviewed staff and resident. Interviews revealed that R1 can leave the facility on their own. LPA conducted a file review and observed the resident's most recent Physician’s Report which indicates the resident can leave the facility without supervision. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 22, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230818143744
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not assure resident have hot water to shower. Resident's roof is in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licesning Program Analyst, Amber Coleman arrived at the Montclair Royale Senior Living Facility to unnannounced to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. LPA met with Administrator, AnnaMarie Santos, to discuss elements of the complaint. It is alleged that facility staff did not insure residents had hot water to shower. During staff interviews, LPA learned that the facility's boiler stopped working properly between 1/30/23 and 2/3/23. Maintenance staff examined the boiler and determined a part was required in order to fix it. Receipts from Ferguson Enterprises indicate, new part was ordered on 2/4/23, picked up on 2/5/23 and the facility boiler was fixed by 2/6/23 restoring hot water to the facility. It is alleged that the resident's room is in disrepair. Resident and staff members statements were consistent. The resident's room had a water leak in the ceiling. LPA also observed evidence of a water leak on the resident'CDSS inspection report, August 22, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230206124429
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent resident from being a victim of financial abuse by an unknown perpetrator. Staff did not dispense resident's medication as prescribed Medication was falsely recorded as being refused by resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman (LPA) arrived to the Montclair Royale Senior Living unannounced to initiate a complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. LPA met with Care Coordinator Assistant, Gwen Galvan to discuss elements of the allegations.During today's visit, LPA conducted staff and resident interviews, a walk through of the facility and collection of pertinent documents. It is alleged that staff did not prevent resident from being a victim by an unknown perpetrator. During interview, with R1, it was reported that R1 put a large sum of cash in her nightstand; approximatley, $700. This was reported to staff who contacted Law Enforcement for assistance. Staff interviews revealed that this incident occured in December 2022. The Montclair Police Department was contacted and made a visit to the facility. Police determined there was not enough evidence to make a report or pursue the theft. Please see LIC9099CDSS inspection report, August 22, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230818153950
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not inform resident's responsible party of incident(s).
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) arrived at the Montclair Royale Senior Living Facility to initiate a complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA signed in and met with Care Coordinator, Araceli Soto. It is alleged that staff did not inform resident's responsible party of incident(s). Interview with staff revealed that two (2) incidents occurred between residents and responsible party was informed. LPA observed an incident report with a notation that responsible party was notified. Interview with responsible party denies receiving any notification about the incidents. Interviews with staff, resident and responsible party revealed conflicting information regarding if incident was reported to responsible party. Due to conflicting interviews, the allegation, staff did not inform resident's responsible party of incident(s) is unsubstantiated. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 31, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230727151227
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not properly assist resident with their medication. Facility kitchen is in disrepair. Facility has rodents. Resident's dietary records are not maintained. The water temperature is not within the required range of 105 F to 120 F.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner made an unannounced visit to the facility to issue findings for the allegations listed above. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and was granted entry and met with Care Coordinator Araceli Soto. The investigation consisted of resident interviews, staff interviews, document review, and a facility tour. For allegation, Staff did not properly assist resident with their medication: It was alleged that two (2) residents (R1 & R2) did not get assistance with refilling their medication in a timely manner. Interviews with staff and document review revealed that there was an uncontrollable shipping delay with the shipping partner that the pharmacy uses to deliver medications. The pharmacy and the facility worked together to resolve the issue by using an alternative shipping company. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 28, 2023 · control 56-AS-20221228154401
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident fell sustaining an injury while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anna Bueno conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to the facility to continue the complaint investigation and deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with assistant care coordinator Gwen Galvan who was informed of the purpose of today’s visit. Administrator Annamarie Soto arrived during the visit. The investigation consisted of resident interviews, LPA observations, and records review. It is alleged that Resident (R1) fell sustaining an injury while in care. CCL Regional office received an incident report that on 4/6/2023 R1 was sent to the hospital after being found with a skin tear from a suspected fall. LPA reviewed records stating that R1 was admitted to this facility on 9/16/22, does not need a 1-1 assistance, and ambulates independently without any physical assistance. LPA did not find any other incidents relating to a fall. LPA attempted to interview R1 but was unsuccessuful due to R1's cognitive impairment. However, LPA observed R1 sCDSS inspection report, July 24, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230412104719
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not inform resident's authorized person of changes to resident's care/placement.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anna Bueno conducted an unannounced subsequent visit to the facility to continue the complaint investigation and deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA met with care coordinator assistant Gwen Galvan who was informed of the purpose of today’s visit. Administrator Annamarie Soto arrived during the visit. The investigation consisted of staff interviews and records review. LPA was unable to speak with Resident (R1). It is alleged that Staff did not inform resident's (R1) authorized person of changes to resident's care or placement. LPA reviewed records showing that R1 previously resided at this facility from 10/05/2021 through 06/11/2023. Records reviewed show that R1 was under the care of the San Bernardino County Office of the Public Guardian (PG). Interview with staff reveal that the facility contacted the PG as early as 06/09/23 due to R1 attempting to self admit at a medical facility for experiencing hallucinations. LPA reviewed records from 06/CDSS inspection report, July 24, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230623110652
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedIllegal Eviction
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) arrived at the Montclair Royale Senior Living Facility unannounced to initiate a complaint investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA introduced self to staff, singed in visitor's log and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA met with Administrative Staff Member, Gwen Galvan, who informed LPA Care Coordinator, Araceli Soto and Administrator, AnnaMarie Santos-Tabila were out of the facility. During the interaction, Gwen Galvan informed Care Coordinator, of LPA's visit. During the visit, LPA met with staff and residents for interviews, collected pertinent documents, completed a walk through of the facility and delivered findings. Staff interviews and correspondence revealed that there was an attempt to evict a resident in care in 3 days; due to an increase in aggressive behaviors. Documentation collected revealed that the request to evict the resident in 3 days was not approved by the Community Care Licensing Office. Documentation fCDSS inspection report, July 17, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230711095633
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to provide a safe and comfortable environment for resident Staff failed to safeguard resident's personal belongings Staff failed to reimburse resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) arrived to the Montclair Royale Senior Living Facility unannounced to deliver findings of the complaint investigation. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. LPA met with Care Coordinator, Araceli Soto and stated purpose of the visit. The investigation included staff, resident, and witness interviews, collection and review of resident files/documents. It is alleged that staff failed to provide a safe environment for the resident. Witness and Resident (R1) interviews revealed that the resident moved in and was placed with another Resident (R2). The two (2) residents shared a conflict with one another that resulted in a physical altercation. Facility staff separated the two residents by finding another room for R1. The Police were called. Police determined that there was no action to be taken because both residents involved had assaulted one another. Staff interviews were consistent with the witness and R1’s interviews. AccordCDSS inspection report, June 28, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230511112540
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed. Facility did not safeguard resident's personal property.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
During staff interviews, LPA learned that Resident #1, (R1) moved into the facility on August 25th, 2022. R1 and his family worked together to complete an Admissions Packet which included the facility's House Rules and a Pre Appraisal form. The documents were signed on 8/25/22 which signified that the house rules were understood and would be followed by R1. The Pre-Appraisal form indicated that R1 entered the facility with no belongings of substantial value, this document was also signed on 8/25/22. It is alleged that the facility did not safeguard the resident's personal property. LPA observed an Incident report dated on 3/15/23 which indicated R1 suffered a medical emergency and had to be taken to the Hospital. When Medical Staff arrived, they had a hard time getting to R1 due to the amount of clutter in the room. When R1 returned to the facility from the hospital, he alleged the facility had stolen his property. During interviews with staff and R1, LPA learned that the items removedCDSS inspection report, May 31, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230330093256
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not providing meals as suggested by doctor.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) arrived at the Montclair Royale Senior Living Facility to initiate a complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. LPA met with Care Coordinator, Araceli Soto to discuss the complaint and allegations. The investigation consisted of staff and resident interviews, record reviews and observations of the kitchen and food service. During staff interviews, LPA learned that dietary needs are discussed during the admissions process. Their dietary needs are also documented. If the dietary needs should change, the doctor sends orders directly to the facility. Doctor orders for dietary needs are given to the Dietary Staff who keeps records of these changes. Kitchen staff print a daily list of residents who require a certain diet. Kitchen staff report that meals are always prepared and provided to residents in care. Often times, resident may not like one item or another. It is a resideCDSS inspection report, May 30, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230526084728
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed. Staff do not ensure that resident is accorded privacy while in care. 2. Staff do not ensure that the facility is in good repair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst, Amber Coleman, (LPA) arrived at the Montclair Royale Senior Living Facility unannounced to deliver findings of complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA introduced self and stated purpose of the visit. LPA met with Care Coordinator, Araceli Soto. It is alleged that staff did not ensure that the resident was accorded privacy while care was being provided. Interviews with residents revealed that the blinds from their two room windows were missing. The resident's room is located on the bottom floor adjacent to the entry way to the facility patio. When it becomes dark out, the room is illuminated, allowing a view into insde the resident room. This was reported to staff on several occasions, but was never addressed. On 4/14/23, at approximately 4pm, LPA observed the window blinds missing. Staff interviews revealed, that the facility does have a work order system in place. Residents will verbally report to maintenance staff what needs to be fixCDSS inspection report, May 30, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230413141951

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents elope due to facility door lock broken. Food service staff serve expired food and uncooked food. Facility is in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anna Bueno conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to continue the investigation of and deliver findings on the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with care coordinator Araceli Soto who was informed of the reason for today's visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with relevant parties, and observations of the facility. Allegation 1 and 2: Residents elope due to facility door lock broken AND Facility is in disrepair. The Department received a special incident report of resident elopement. Staff interview revealed that the memory care door lock was broken, allowing memory care residents to leave the unit. Staff further stated that care staff assigned to temporarily guard the door quit and walked off in the middle of their shift. This allegation is substantiated. Allegation 3: Food service staff serve expired food and uncooked food. Witness interviews confirmed that food items were expired and tossed out. Interviews reveal thCDSS inspection report, December 7, 2022 · control 56-AS-20220602102400
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUncleared staff working at the facility. Staff have not received required training. Facility is in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anna Bueno conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to continue the investigation of and deliver findings on the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with care coordinator Araceli Soto who was informed of the reason for today's visit. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with relevant parties, and observations of the facility. Allegation 1: Uncleared staff working at the facility. LPA reviewed records and found Staff (S1) was associated to the facility for a time. Interview with staff confirms that S1 was employed by this facility and terminated when the facility received the exemption denial letter from CBMP. Allegation 2: Staff have not received required training. LPA received and reviewed facility med tech schedule and found Staff (S2) on rotation. Staff interview revealed that S2 has not received their full medication training and is shadowing current med techs. Records show that S2 is assigned a schedule and witness interviewCDSS inspection report, December 7, 2022 · control 56-AS-20220329095154
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedCommunications to the facility are not being answered promptly.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Melody Brown and Victoria Chitgian met with Administrator Annamarie Santos-Tabila at Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) Adult and Senior Care (ASC) Regional Office 10/27/2022 at 10:30 AM to deliver findings for the allegation listed above. LPAs Brown and Chitgian explained the purpose of the requested Office Visit. The investigation consisted of observation, interviews and review of pertinent documentations. Through the information gathered during the investigation, it was confirmed by documents review and interviews that Communications to the facility are not being answered promptly. It was alleged that on 07/11/2022, the facility would not answer calls from hospital staff to report Resident 1 (R1) status. LPA Brown initiated the investigation on 07/15/2022. Interviews with staffs indicated knowledge of the implemented Facility Directive to Night/NOC Shift Medical Technicians (Medtech) that *** Continuation on LIC9099 *** SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 27, 2022 · control 56-AS-20220712101447
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is not assisting resident with hygiene needs. Facility is not safeguarding resident's belongings. Staff are not ensuring resident has clean clothes. Resident's room does not have adequate lighting. Resident's bed does not have appropriate linens. Facility not notifying responsible party about incidents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anna Bueno conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Mikaila Tonan, receptionist. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with relevant parties, and observations of the facility. Allegation 1: Staff is not assisting resident with hygiene needs. Interviews reveal that Resident 1 (R1) is ambulatory and capable of self-care with minimal assistance. Allegation 2: Facility is not safeguarding resident's belongings. Based on observations and interviews, LPA was able to confirm that it is the facility’s policy to have residents label their belongings. Allegation 3: Staff are not ensuring resident has clean clothes. Interviews reveal that R1 always has clean clothes available however R1 may need to change clothes after meals. Allegation 4: Resident's room does not have adequate lighting. LPA was unable to find corroborating evidence relating to this allegation. Allegation 5: Resident'CDSS inspection report, May 6, 2022 · control 18-AS-20220105101235
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed. Staff did not provide adequate food service. Resident was not provided clean linen. Staff did not safeguard resident's personal items.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anna Bueno conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA met with Mikaila Tonan, receptionist. The investigation consisted of file review, interviews with relevant parties, and observations of the facility. Allegation 1: Staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed. The investigation revealed that while Resident 1 (R1) was being given medication, R1 will sometimes not take the medication. Also, it was revealed that R1 is ambulatory and self responsible. Allegation 2: Staff did not provide adequate food service. The investigation revealed that R1 does not have a special diet. This facility provides a modified menu for residents with dietary restrictions. Allegation 3: Resident was not provided clean linen. Interviews reveal that R1 had purchased their own linens. Also, LPA verified that the facility has a supply of clean linen labeled with the facility’s name and residents are also able toCDSS inspection report, May 6, 2022 · control 56-AS-20220318083750
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility mismanaging residents' funds.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Ryan Gardner and Anna Bueno arrived at the facility unannounced to commence a complaint investigation and deliver the findings for the complaint allegation. LPAs met with Care Coordinator, Araceli Soto. After interviews, record review, and gathering evidence, it was determined that the residents' money is not managed by the facility. Resident is on an Assisted Living Wavier Program that helps cover the residents monthly rent. The facility does not manage personal money for residents. Thus, the allegation was deemed to be UNFOUNDED. LPAs determined that the allegation, "Facility mismanaging residents' funds" was deemed to be UNFOUNDED. A finding of UNFOUNDED means that the allegations were false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was given to Araceli Soto. LPA did not observe any violations of Title 22 during this visit. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, February 28, 2022 · control 18-AS-20220222112449

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedAdministrator does not respond to resident's representative. Staff do not assist resident with incontinence's needs. Residents room is malodorous.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Anna Bueno and Rohit Lama conducted an unannounced visit to this facility to investigate and deliver findings on the above allegations. LPAs met with care coordinator, Araceli Soto and advised them of the purpose of today's visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of pertinent documents. Allegation 1: Administrator does not respond to resident's representative. Interviews revealed that resident 1 (R1) is able to communicate their needs to staff. LPAs observed R1 speaking to several staff. Allegation 2: Staff do not assist resident with incontinence needs. Interviews revealed that the facility changes diapers every two hours. LPAs interviews and observations reveal that R1 needs moderate assistance toileting while resident 2 (R2) bathing are provided by another vendor. Allegation 3: Residents room is malodorous. Interviews show that resident rooms are cleaned daily and have scheduled thorough cleaning weekly. R1 stated that they ask hCDSS inspection report, December 6, 2021 · control 18-AS-20211129084328

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 83 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
10
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
11
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
22
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
45
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
83
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(909) 621-3545
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Montclair Royale Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.