Angelic Mansions is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Yucca Valley, San Bernardino County, California — state license #361800118, licensed for 15 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 23, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Angelic Mansions

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 15 residents · Yucca Valley, CA · San Bernardino County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #361800118, held since 2017 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
7585 Warren Vista Ave · Yucca Valley, San Bernardino County
Phone
(760) 365-4620
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 15 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 5 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 15 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 14 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 23, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
June 23, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
7 of 15 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 2, 2021 to June 23, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 6 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 2 documents
Jun 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not dispose of non-consumed leftover food after 72 hours Staff does not prevent cross contamination of raw meat Staff does not ensure food is stored, prepared and served in a safe healthful manner Staff are not trained in food handling and safety procedures Staff do not ensure medications are centrally stored in a locked and safe place that are inaccessible to unauthorized persons.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations mentioned. LPA met with Administrator Steve Rajadas and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding Allegation #1: Interviews with three (3) staff members indicated that leftover food is not frozen or reserved for residents. The Administrator informed LPA that leftover food is not served to residents; if food is not discarded after three (3) days, it is stored and frozen for Administrator use only. Interviews with three (3) residents reflected that they have not observed food being recycled and are unaware of whether food is discarded after three (3) days. During the kitchen tour, LPA did not observe any food stored beyond three (3) days. Regarding Allegation #2: LPA interviewed three (3) staff members, all of whom reported that they take precautions to prevent cross-contamination. Staff explained that raw meats are not placed directly on counters and are instead set othe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 23, 2026 · control 56-AS-20251202152431
Jun 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Dec 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 4, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations6typical 0
Type B citations4typical 0
Substantiated complaints10typical 0
Total complaints5typical 1
State visits on file14typical 8
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 307 licensed mid-size homes (7–15 beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2017.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202612020251102024220202322020222312021111
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

≈ $3,500–$5,500 /mo
our estimate — San Bernardino County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (760) 365-4620

Is Angelic Mansions licensed?

Yes — Angelic Mansions is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Yucca Valley (San Bernardino County): California license #361800118, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 15 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 23, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Angelic Mansions care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Angelic Mansions with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 15 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5.

How much does Angelic Mansions cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Angelic Mansions's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in San Bernardino County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Angelic Mansions accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Angelic Mansions is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

7 of 15 beds occupied (47%) when the state visited on June 23, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Angelic Mansions?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 14 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2021 for Angelic Mansions; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 23, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not dispose of non-consumed leftover food after 72 hours Staff does not prevent cross contamination of raw meat Staff does not ensure food is stored, prepared and served in a safe healthful manner Staff are not trained in food handling and safety procedures Staff do not ensure medications are centrally stored in a locked and safe place that are inaccessible to unauthorized persons.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations mentioned. LPA met with Administrator Steve Rajadas and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding Allegation #1: Interviews with three (3) staff members indicated that leftover food is not frozen or reserved for residents. The Administrator informed LPA that leftover food is not served to residents; if food is not discarded after three (3) days, it is stored and frozen for Administrator use only. Interviews with three (3) residents reflected that they have not observed food being recycled and are unaware of whether food is discarded after three (3) days. During the kitchen tour, LPA did not observe any food stored beyond three (3) days. Regarding Allegation #2: LPA interviewed three (3) staff members, all of whom reported that they take precautions to prevent cross-contamination. Staff explained that raw meats are not placed directly on counters and are instead set o— CDSS inspection report, June 23, 2026 · control 56-AS-20251202152431

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate laundry service to resident Staff did not provide food in the quantity necessary to meet resident's needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation. LPA met with Steven Rajadas, Administrator and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA observations, interviews, and document review. Regarding the allegation staff did not provide adequate laundry service to resident, Administrator and staff interviews deny that staff is not providing adequate laundry service to residents in care. Six (6) out of seven (7) residents interviewed stated that the facility does provided adequated laundry service. Regarding the allegation staff did not provide food in the quantity necessary to meet resident's needs, Administrator and staff interviews deny not providing enough food for residents in care. Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, August 14, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230811083437

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has an infestation of cockroaches. Facility does not have hot water. Resident(s) not being fed a sufficient amout of food. Residents have access to toxic materials while in care. Residents have access to sharp objects while in care. Centrally stored medications are not kept in a safe and locked place.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of initiating an investigation and delivering findings for the above complaint allegations. LPA Gardner met with Administrator Steven Rajadas and explained the reason for the visit. At the time of the visit there were eleven (11) residents, and three (3) staff present. During today’s visit, LPA Gardner toured the facility, interviewed staff members, interviewed residents, and reviewed facility records. For allegation, Facility has an infestation of cockroaches. LPA Gardner observed cockroaches in the hallway and in the living room area near a hole in the wall. Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, July 1, 2022 · control 56-AS-20220628152115

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 14 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for mid-size homes (7–15 beds), computed across all 307 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
6
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
4
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
10
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 1
State visits on file
14
typical for this size: 8
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(760) 365-4620
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Angelic Mansions? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.