Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Daniel Residential Care HomeLicense #347005713 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareDaniel Residential Care HomeLicense #347005713 · 4295 Amapola Way, Sacramento, CA · (916) 717-3263Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Sacramento County/Sacramento/Daniel Residential Care Home
Map · 4295 Amapola Way

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$3,550/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $2,900–$4,400 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (916) 717-3263

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

DR

Call Daniel Residential Care Home

Sacramento · Licensed for 6

(916) 717-3263

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Sacramento

Daniel Residential Care Home

4295 Amapola Way, Sacramento, CA 95823 · Licensed since 2016

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Daniel Residential Care Home

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$3,550 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $2,900–$4,400 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: WheelchairState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchair

Not on file: dementia, hospice and bedridden approvals.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. ROOM #1 AND ROOM #3 CLEARED FOR NON-AMBULATORY; ROOM #2 CLEARED FOR AMBULATORY ONLY

945 - ADULTS / ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Daniel Residential Care Home: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines, staying through hospice and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$3,550a month to start

Likely $2,900–$4,400

From 10 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$3,550likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$3,550likely $2,900–$4,400

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $2,900–$4,600
$3,550
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,450–$7,900
$6,050
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes10 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,000 to $6,000

$2,000$6,000

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

10 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,400–$5,150.

  • Maria Teresa Home CareSacramento · 2.6 mi · Small home
    $2,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Immaculate Care HomeElk Grove · 3.0 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Comforts of Home Laguna ParkElk Grove · 3.3 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on its own website · base rate including all services and board/care · seen October 27, 2026
  • Siebenthal Care HomeSacramento · 3.5 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Acc Assisted Living at Greenhaven TerraceSacramento · 3.9 mi · Mid-size home
    $2,800Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Utopia Assisted LivingSacramento · 4.2 mi · Mid-size home
    $5,000Listed on its own website · starting price for housing and basic services · seen October 5, 2026
  • Yellow OrchidElk Grove · 4.2 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Love and Serenity IISacramento · 4.4 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Alaturi CareSacramento · 4.7 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Comforts of Home GavirateElk Grove · 4.9 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living studio · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

4295 Amapola Way, Sacramento, CA 95823Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Kaiser Foundation Hospital - South SacramentoHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.7 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #347005713 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 3 of 10 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document

May 29, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 05/29/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee conducted an annual inspection at Daniel Residential Care Home, LLC. Upon arrival, LPA Lee met with care staff Helen Agbiriogu and requested that she notify the facility Administrator Joyce Diala that Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD), LPA Lee were present to conduct the inspection. Care staff Agbiriogu assisted with the inspection. Approximately two and 30 minutes later, Administrator Diala arrived at the facility. LPA Lee and care staff Agbiriogu toured the physical plant to assess the health and safety of residents in care. Areas inspected included, but were not limited to, the kitchen, resident bedrooms, resident bathrooms, living room, dining room, and outdoor areas. During the inspection, LPA Lee observed that the facility was free of odor; however, facility was not maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. Several dining room chairs were observed with incontinence pads covering the seats. The pads appeared soiled, dirty, and unsanitary, creating a potential health and sanitation concern for residents. LPA Lee also observed that the emergency exit gate was difficult to open and not maintained in good repair. LPA Lee observed that all resident bedrooms were equipped with the required furnishings and adequate lighting. The facility maintained a public telephone in the common area and had the required postings displayed. The thermostat measured 73 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 68 to 85 degrees Fahrenheit. During the kitchen inspection, LPA Lee observed two kitchen knives stored in an unlocked dishwasher, making them accessible to residents. In the laundry room, which was unlocked and later observed standing open, LPA Lee observed toxin and a knife made accessible in the laundry room. Multiple paint cans were also observed in the garage. CONTINUED LIC 809-C Because both the laundry room and garage doors were unlocked, hazardous items, including sharp objects and toxic substances, were readily accessible to residents. LPA Lee advised Administrator Diala that all knives, toxins, and hazardous materials must be stored in a locked location and remain inaccessible to residents at all times. Medication storage was inspected and found to be locked and inaccessible to residents. The hot water temperature in the resident bathroom measured 106.3 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range of 105 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility maintained the required seven-day supply of nonperishable food and two-day supply of perishable food. Fire extinguishers, smoke detectors, and carbon monoxide detectors were observed to be in compliance. The fire extinguisher was purchased on 12/10/2025, and proof of purchase was attached. Grab bars in the bathrooms were observed to be secure and in good repair. The resident shower contained a textured non-slip shower base; however, testing revealed that the surface had become slippery due to deterioration of the texture. LPA Lee advised the facility to have additional non-slip mats to reduce the risk of falls. While inspecting the courtyard, LPA Lee observed three garbage bags filled with recyclable water bottles, a television, an exercise machine, and two tables stored along the side of the facility. Although these items did not completely block the emergency exit gate, they partially obstructed the pathway and could impede emergency access if emergency medical services were needed. LPA Lee advised Administrator Diala that all emergency exits and pathways must remain clear and unobstructed at all times. Administrator Diala stated the items would be removed. During the inspection, LPA Lee learned that the facility is fire-cleared for non-ambulatory residents in bedrooms 1 and 3, while bedroom 2 is approved for ambulatory residents only. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with care staff Agbiriogu and Administrator Diala, Resident 1 (R1) resides in bedroom 2. According to R1’s LIC 602 Physician’s Report dated 05/15/2025, R1 is non-ambulatory and should not be in room 2 as room 2 is not fire cleared for non-ambulatory residents. Administrator Diala stated that R1 was previously sharing bedroom 3 with another resident; however, resident 2 (R2) complained about R1 was taking their belongings, resulting in R1 being moved to bedroom 2. As a result, the facility is operating outside of its approved fire clearance by housing a non-ambulatory resident in a room designated for ambulatory residents only. Per Adiministrator Diala, R1 will be moved back to room 3. LPA Lee conducted a medication audit for four of four residents by comparing medications on hand to the Medication Administration Records (MARs). The medication review revealed discrepancies. CONTINUED LIC 809-C R2 had two PRN medications, Melatonin 3 mg and Equate Stool Softener 100 mg, stored in the resident's medication container. According to the MAR, both medications were administered from 05/01/2026 through 05/28/2026; however, the facility was unable to provide physician orders authorizing the use of these medications. LPA Lee reviewed four of four resident files and found them to be complete. Three staff files were also reviewed and found to be incomplete. Based on interviews with Administrator Diala, the facility was unable to provide documentation showing that 20 hours of continual staff training was completed during calendar year 2025. Additionally, a review of staff records revealed that two staff members had expired First Aid/CPR certifications. One certification expired on 07/17/2023 and the second expired on 04/21/2026. The following documents will be email to LPA by 06/5/2026 end of day 5:00 PM: (1) LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility (2) Copy of Administrator Certificate (4) LIC 610 Current Emergency Disaster Plan (5) Proof of Current Liability Insurance (6) LIC 500 Current Personnel Report An immediate penalty was assessed today in the amount $500 due to 87204 Limitations - Capacity and Ambulatory Status. As a result of this annual visit, the facility is not in compliance with Title 22 Regulation, and the deficiency can be found on the LIC 809-D page. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Diala and a copy of these LIC 809 reports, LIC 809-D page, LIC 421 IM and Appeals rights were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2026

The state marks this report as 10 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 8. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20251 state visit · 1 document

May 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 05/01/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced annual inspection. LPA Lee met with care staff Helen Agbiriogu and Irene Iberi and explained the purpose of the visit. Care staff called the facility designated administrator (FDA) Joyce Diala to informed that CCLD was present in the facility. FDA arrived approximately an hour later. Care staff and administrator assisted with today’s visit. Administrator certificate # is 6035237740 and will expire on 08/05/25. The current census is 5 with 2 facility staff. The facility is a single-story building licensed to serve six (6) residents. Rooms 1 and 3 are approved for non-ambulatory residents, while room 2 is designated for ambulatory residents only. LPA Lee conducted an inspection of the physical plant, including but not limited to the common areas, kitchen, dining area, resident bedrooms and bathrooms, laundry room, garage and outdoor courtyards, to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. The facility was observed to be clean, odor-free, and in good repair. Resident bedrooms were properly furnished with appropriate bedding and adequate lighting. No bodies of water were observed on the premises. During the kitchen tour, LPA Lee observed a sufficient supply of food, including a seven-day supply of non-perishable and a two-day supply of perishable items. The hot water temperature in the resident bathroom sink measured 110.3°F, which falls within the regulatory range of 105°F to 120°F. Grab bars and non-slip mats in the bathrooms were secure and in good condition. Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were found to be operational and in compliance with fire safety requirements. The facility's fire extinguisher, located in the hallway, was purchased on 10/27/24. Per administrator Diala, the last fire drill was conducted on in April 2025 and that it was not documented. LPA Lee advised that fire drill needs to be conducted every 3 month and should be documented. Continued LIC 809-C A public telephone is available in the common area, and all required documents and postings were visibly displayed; however, LPA Lee observed PUB 475 poster is not the correct sized and LPA Lee advised administrator that the poster needs to be in the size of 20” by 26”. The facility thermostat was set to 73°F at the time of the inspection. Toxic cleaning agents were stored in a locked hallway closet, inaccessible to residents. Sharp knives were observed secured in a locked cabinet. Medications were stored securely and were inaccessible to residents. LPA Lee reviewed medications for all six (5) residents and verified that the medication administration records (MARs) were complete and accurate. The first aid kit was inspected and contained all required supplies. Resident and staff files were requested and reviewed. All six (5) resident files were found to be complete. LPA Lee reviewed staff 1 (S1)’s file and it was not complete. S1 did not have current 20 hours of continual training, and first aid/CPR certificate had expired. LPA Lee requested to review the administrator’s file, and it was learned that the administrator’s file is not at the facility; therefore, LPA Lee was not to review the administrator’s file. A review of staff records confirmed that all individuals requiring background checks were fingerprint cleared and associated with the facility. The following documents will be email to LPA by 05/08/25 end of day 5:00 PM: (1) LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility (2) Copy of Administrator Certificate (4) LIC 610 Current Emergency Disaster Plan (5) Proof of Current Liability Insurance (6) LIC 500 Current Personnel Report As a result of this annual visit, the facility is not in compliance with Title 22 Regulation, and the deficiency can be found on the LIC 809-D page. An exit interview was conducted with administrator Diala and a copy of these LIC 809 reports, LIC 809-D page, and Appeals rights were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 1, 2025

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20241 state visit · 1 document

May 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 05/21/2024 at 12:48 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Pang Lee arrived at the facility to conduct an unannounced annual inspection. LPA Lee met with direct care giver, Helen Agbiriogu and Irene Iberi who then called administrator Joyce Diala to informed that CCLD is present. Administrator stated that she won’t be able to join the visit. LPA Lee explained the purpose of today’s visit. Administrator Certificate # 6035237740 expires on 08/05/2025. The current census is 6 with 2 facility staff. This facility is a single story building licensed to served six (6) residents. Room 1 and 3 are cleared for non-ambulatory residents and room 2 are cleared for ambulatory residents. LPA Lee inspected the physical plant including but not limited to the common area, kitchen, dining area, residents’ bedrooms, residents’ bathrooms, laundry room, staff room, garage, and outside courtyards of the facility to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. It was observed the facility was free of odor and clean. LPA Lee observed in resident bedroom # 3 the sliding screen door was not in good repair. LPA Lee observed care staff Helen tried to put the screen back on the rail and was not able to put the sliding screen back on. LPA Lee observed bedrooms to be properly furnished with appropriate bedding and lighting. There are no bodies of water present. LPA Lee toured the kitchen and observed the facility had sufficient seven-day non-perishable food supplies. It was observed that two-day perishable food supplies were not sufficient for 6 residents in care. Hot water temperature was measured at 1110.2 degrees Fahrenheit in resident bathroom sink, which is within the required regulation of 105 to 120 degrees Grab bars and non-slip mat were observed to be stable and in good repair at this time. Continued LIC 809-C Smoke and carbon monoxide detectors are in compliance with fire safety. The fire extinguisher is located in the hallway and was last serviced on 07/17/2024. LPA Lee observed the facility has a has a public telephone in the common area and the facility has the required posters posted. Facility thermostat observed at 73 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA Lee observed toxins located in the hallway closet and kept locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA Lee observed sharp knives kept locked and inaccessible to residents. LPA Lee checked medication storage and found medication to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA Lee reviewed and compared 3 out 6 medication administration record (MAR) along with residents’ medications. Records reviewed indicated that resident 1 (R1) Quetiapine 25 MG medication not stored in its originally received container. The instruction for the medication is to take one-half tablet by mouth. It was learned that care staff pre-cut the tablet and stored the half tablets in an extra container and created a label for the Quetiapine medication. LPA Lee asked to inspect the facility’s first aid kit and care staff were not able to provide LPA Lee the first aid kit other than bandages. LPA Lee requested resident and staff files for review. LPA Lee reviewed 5 out of 6 resident files and based on record review (R2) and (R3) diagnosed with dementia does not have a current LIC 602 Physician Report in their files. LPA Lee reviewed 2 staff files and they were complete. LPA Lee also requested to review administrator Joyce Diala’s file, and it was learned that facility staff was not able to be located administrator's file. A brief interview was conducted with administrator Diala, who stated that she is not sure why her file is not at the facility and will follow-up on her file. LPA Lee reviewed staff criminal record clearances and a review of staff records indicates that all facility staff or other individuals who require caregiver background checks are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. The following documents will be email to LPA Lee (pang.lee@dss.ca.gov) by 05/31/2024 by 5:00 PM by end of day: (1) LIC 308 Designation of Administrative Responsibility (2) LIC 500 Personnel Report (3) Copy of Administrator Certificate (4) LIC 610 Emergency Disaster Plan (5) Proof of Current Liability Insurance As a result of this annual visit, the facility is not in compliance with Title 22 Regulation, and the deficiencies can be found on the LIC 809 D page. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of these LIC 809 reports, LIC 809-D page, and Appeals rights were provided to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 21, 2024
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 7 documents

20231 state visit · 1 document

May 10, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced on 5/10/23 to conduct an annual inspection at this facility. LPA Moleski met with administrator Emmanuel Diala and explained the purpose of the visit. Diala's administrator certificate number is 6035710740, and it expires on 8/2/2023. LPA Moleski reviewed two staff files (S1 and S2) and two resident files (R1 and R2). LPA Moleski toured the facility with Diala and inspected common areas, the kitchen, bedrooms, bathroom areas and backyard areas. Furniture and furnishings were sufficient to meet the needs of residents. The facility temperature was 73 degrees Fahrenheit, which is within the required range. LPA Moleski and Diala observed a bathroom faucet's water temperature measure 135 degrees Fahrenheit, which is outside of the required range of 105 and 120 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA Moleski photographed the reading. LPA Moleski observed a first aid kit, an up-to-date fire extinguisher and working carbon/smoke detectors. LPA Moleski observed a minimum 2-day perishable supply of food and a minimum 7-day supply of nonperishable food. LPA Moleski observed a locked cabinet for the storage of medication. LPA Moleski observed a locked closet for the storage of cleaning solutions. LPA Moleski interviewed S2 and R2. This facility is being cited per 22 CCR Section 87303(e)(2). An exit interview was conducted with Diala. Appeal rights and a copy of this report was left with Diala.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 10, 2023

20225 state visits · 6 documents

Dec 13, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident with medication refills in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to complete a complaint investigation. LPA Lund was met by Care Staff Helen Agbiriogu who called administrator Emmanuel Diala. LPA Lund spoke administrator Emmanuel Diala and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Emmanuel Diala could not make the visit today and gave permission for care staff Helen Agbiriogu to sign required paperwork. Staff did not assist resident with medication refills in a timely manner- Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with staff, and residents. It was reported to LPA Lund that resident (R1) was admitted to the facility on 8/3/2022 with many different medications that were no longer prescribed for R1. R1 wanted to take the medications that were no longer prescribed to R1. R1 complained to staff and Administrators Emmanuel & Joyce Diala that R1 wanted to take unprescribed medications. . Unsubstantiated R1 was admitted to the facility on August 3, 2022. R1 stayed at the facility from August 3, 2022 through August 9, 2022. August 10, 2022 through August 19, 2022, R1 was admitted to the hospital and came back to the facility from August 20, 2022 through August 22, 2022. R1 went back to the hospital on August 22, 2022 and didn’t return back to the facility. Administrators and staff only gave R1 prescribed medications according to the Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated August 3 through August 31, 2022. LPA Lund interviewed staff and resident in care. Staff stated, “That they only give medications according to the MAR and give the medication to residents in care in a timely manner. Residents stated, “That they get the medications when they ask for them and when staff give it to them.” Based on facility records, interviews with staff and residents on the information provided, it was unclear if staff did not assist resident with medication refills in a timely manner therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. The Department (CCLD) has found the allegations. Unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation(s) are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation(s) may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) occurred. An exit interview was conducted with care staff Helen Agbirioguthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220810094936
Dec 13, 2022Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Untrained staff Staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed Staff mismanaged resident's medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jason Lund arrived unannounced to complete a complaint investigation. LPA Lund was met by care staff Helen Agbiriogu who called administrator Emmanuel Diala. LPA Lund spoke administrator Emmanuel Diala and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator Emmanuel Diala could not make the visit today and gave permission for care staff Helen Agbiriogu to sign required paperwork. Untrained staff- Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with staff, and residents. It was reported that medications were not give timely. LPA Lund reviewed resident (R1) facility records R1 was admitted to the facility on 8/3/2022 with many different medications that were no longer prescribed for R1. R1 wanted to take the medications that were no longer prescribed to R1. R1 complained to staff and Administrators Emmanuel & Joyce Diala that R1 wanted to take unprescribed medications. Unsubstantiated LPA Lund reviewed facility training records for staff. On 1/26/2021 and 6/7/2022. On 1/26/2021 staff were trained on how to assist residents with medications intake, how to store and destroy medications, report/document medication errors and etc. On 6/7/2022 staff were trained on the process of handling medications, administration of medication logging, in destruction of medication, process of reading labels, recording, reporting, storage and other information of medication. LPA Lund interviewed staff and residents in care. Staff stated, “That they only give medications according to the MAR and give medications in a timely manner”. Residents stated, “That they get medications when ask for and when staff give it to them when it is time to be given.” Based on facility records, interviews with staff and residents on the information provided, it was unclear if the facility has untrained staff therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed- It was reported that staff didn’t read the proper Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident (R1). Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with staff, and residents. It was reported to LPA Lund that R1 was admitted to the facility on 8/3/2022 with many different medications that were no longer prescribed for R1. R1 wanted to take the medications that were no longer prescribed to R1. LPA Lund reviewed Medication Administration Record (MAR) from the facility Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated August 3, 2022 through August 31, 2022. R1 was admitted to the facility on August 3, 2022. R1 stayed at the facility from August 3, 2022 through August 9, 2022. August 10, 2022 through August 19, 2022 R1 was admitted to the hospital. R1 came back to the facility from the hospital August 19, 2022 through August 22, 2022. R1 went back to the hospital on August 22, 2022 and didn’t return to the facility. LPA Lund observed that MAR for R1 for August 2022 and it was properly filled out.. LPA Lund reviewed facility training records for staff. On 1/26/2021 and 6/7/2022. On 1/26/2021 staff were trained on how to assist residents with medications intake, how to store and destroy medications, report/document medication errors and etc. On 6/7/2022 staff were trained on the process of handling medications, administration of medication logging, in destruction of medication, process of reading labels, recording, reporting, storage and other information of medication. Based on facility records, interviews with staff and residents on the information provided, it was unclear if the staff did not administer resident's medication as prescribed therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. Staff mismanaged resident's medication- It was reported that staff didn’t give out the proper medications to R1. Based on records reviewed and interviews conducted with staff, and residents. It was reported to LPA Lund that resident (R1) was admitted to the facility on 8/3/2022 with many different medications that were no longer prescribed for R1. R1 wanted to take the medications that were no longer prescribed to R1. LPA Lund reviewed Medication Administration Record (MAR) from the facility Medication Administration Record (MAR) dated August 3, 2022 through August 31, 2022. R1 was admitted to the facility on August 3, 2022. R1 stayed at the facility from August 3, 2022 through August 9, 2022. August 10, 2022 through August 19, 2022 R1 was admitted to the hospital. R1 came back to the facility from the hospital on August 20, 2022 through August 22, 2022. R1 went back to the hospital on August 22, 2022 and didn’t return to the facility. LPA Lund observed that MAR for R1 for August 2022 and it was properly filled out.. Based on facility records, interviews with staff and residents on the information provided, it was unclear if the staff mismanaged resident's medication therefore the allegation was deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. The Department (CCLD) has found the allegations. Unsubstantiated. A finding that the complaint allegation(s) are UNSUBSTANTIATED means that although the allegation(s) may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation(s) occurred. An exit interview was conducted with care staff Helen Agbirioguthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 13, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220817154450
Oct 3, 2022Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file

Type of visit: Office

An announced office meeting was conducted on October 3, 2022 in the Sacramento South Regional Office via Microsoft Teams. The purpose of this office meeting was to discuss professional forward progress and licensee conduct. Present in the meeting representing Community Care Licensing Sacramento South, was Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Stephen Richardson, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jamie Ivey Canady, and Daniel Residential Care Home LLC representatives Emmanuel Diala and Joyce Diala. Topics discussed during the meeting: Establish a timeline for Scabies Outbreak Health and Safety of Residents Licensee Conduct Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Standards of Responsibility Business practices regarding licensee interaction with Community Care Licensing (CCL) Emmanuel Diala: The only thing I can say is that everybody did not get the rash at the same time. Stephen and them probably in March. As soon as we noticed it all of them have been taking to the hospital. Emmanuel Diala: Resident 1 (R1) is the biggest problem everyone is focusing on. He did test on allergy. R1 was referred to dermatology. We did everything for each of the resident. All the residents have been to the hospital in March until about July at least 4 to 5 times. Cont 809-C. Emmanuel Diala: Prior to that we were sending them to the doctor and diagnosis of scabies was only to R1. To make sure I am understanding… R1 had a rash was taken to the PCP and PCP determined an allergy test needed to be done and then eventually determined to be seen by dermatology. In July they determined that he had scabies. LPA Jamie Ivey Canady noted the 1/27/22 After Visit Summary for R2 with a diagnosis of Scabies and Emmanuel said that they do not remember sending that document. LPA Jamie Ivey Canady agreed to send the document back to Emannuel Diala after the meeting. LPM Stephen Richardson then continued to talk and Joyce tried to interrupt at 10:44 AM. Stephen told her to hold on he needs to finish. LPM provided feedback regarding on what the facility needed to do after receiving the documents in 01/27/2022. Administrator Joyce Diala: We did not ignore our clients. Even if we got it in January 2022, we did not ignore her. We still took her. LPM Stephen Richardson explained: We are not saying you did not take them to the doctor. We are talking about the follow up care that occurred or did not occur. We are talking about how it was not 100% there to make sure the health and safety of the resident. In January after you received that document, you are required to report to public health. Administrator Joyce Diala at 10:58 AM told Jamie not to nod her head and to say yes or no. Emmanuel Diala: When she came, we did the treatment for bed bugs. We got that treatment. They did not say he had scabies in July. Final Discussion: LPA Christina Valerio tried to deliver the findings. Joyce and Emmanuel Diala refused to sign findings and establish a POC. LPM explained the purpose of delivering findings and the role and what had transpired. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 6, no deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Emmanuel Diala. A copy of this report was provided via email and an electronic email read receipt confirms receiving these documents. Administrator Emmanuel Diala will sign the document and send signed copy to LPA Ivey Canady at at jamie.ivey-canady@dss.ca.gov.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2022
Sep 12, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained rashes while in care Staff failed to meet resident's needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio contacted Administrator Joyce Diala via Teams Virtual Meeting and explained the reason for the meeting. LPA Valerio explained current complaint is being closed virtually due to the current Scabies outbreak at the facility. The department has determined the following as it relates to the above-mentioned allegations. According to RP and S1, 2 out of 3 residents have had an undiagnosed rash since March of 2022. In accordance with those interviews, residents have been passing the rash back and forth between residents. R1’s rash was finally diagnosed on 8/17/2022, while in the hospital. According to interviews, continued requests made by CCL and RP, residents were not physically provided medical care regarding rash outbreaks. Continues on LIC 9099 - C... Substantiated S1 stated the Scabies outbreak started with a resident that is no longer at the facility. S1 stated the resident was at the facility for less than one month’s time. S1 stated there was no knowledge as to why the rash was being passed back and forth between residents. Based on statements by staff, R2 has ongoing refused treatment, which has proposed a potential continued health and safety risk to the other residents in the facility. According to interview with S2, the length of time R2 has refused medical treatment for the outbreak has been approximately 5 months. According to LPA Ivey Canady observations, staff did not ensure residents medical needs were properly addressed. According to interviews, licensee did not produce requested documentation to verify residents’ medical needs are addressed in a timely manner. Licensee stated residents had been taken to doctor’s appointments. Upon further investigation of those appointments, LPA Ivey Canady discovered those appointments were only phone consultations which required the licensee to follow-up with a dermatologist. According to records produced by the licensee, the residents had not been seen for this medical issue for over a month since the televisit. According to record review, a specialized dermatologist directed the care providers to take the residents in to see a specialist immediately. According to interviews, S1 and S2 did not follow doctors’ orders. Based on interviews and record review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 6) are being cited on the attached LIC-9099D. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. Appeal rights were provided. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Joyce. Administrator Joyce said the entire report is false and not true. Administrator Joyce said she is not going to sign anything or create any plan of correction. Administrator Joyce did not want to continue conversation with LPA unless a manager is present. LPA to set up an office meeting with licensee and Licensing Program Managers to discuss this matter.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220518093355

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(16) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 13, 2022

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (16) To receive or reject medical care or other services. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interview, and record review, residents sustained unidentified rash while in care. Diagnosis of rash was not confirmed until 5 months after onset of rash. This poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee refused to create a plan of correction with LPA Valerio. LPA Valerio will verify if deficiency is cleared on POC due date. Licensee refused to sign. On 09/13/22, Licensee signed hard copy. This report was amended to show plan of correction created with licensee on 09/13/22. Licensee stated the facility will ensure all residents will receive medical care or other services. Licensee stated the facility will follow doctors orders and keep records for each resident in care. Licensee to send statement acknowledging review of 8746.1(a)(16).

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 13, 2022

87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed...:(1)The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical... care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the licensee did not obtain a plan for medical care regarding the rashes for 2 out of 3 residents. This poses an immediate health and safety risks to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee refused to create a plan of correction with LPA Valerio. LPA Valerio will verify if deficiency is cleared on POC due date. Licensee refused to sign. On 09/13/22, Licensee signed hard copy. This report was amended to show plan of correction created with licensee on 09/13/22. Licensee stated they will document resident appointments, including follow up appointments. Licensee will send documentation via fax regarding scabies treatment and show when facility is cleared by public health.

Jun 1, 2022Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file

Type of visit: Office

An announced office meeting was conducted on June 1, 2022 in the Sacramento South Regional Office via Microsoft Teams. The purpose of this office meeting was to discuss the deficiencies observed on visit 05/20/2022 and to discuss the Administrator's plan to mitigate the spread of a current rash observed on 2 residents. Present in the meeting representing Community Care Licensing Sacramento South, was Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Stephen Richardson, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jamie Ivey Canady, and Daniel Residential Care Home LLC representatives Emmanuel Diala and Joyce Diala. Topics discussed during the meeting: Unannounced Visit on 05/20/2022 Health and Safety of Residents Follow-up Appointments Universal Precautions Administrator Responsibility Reporting Requirements Bi-Weekly Progress Reports Cont on 809-C The facility has stated they will do the following to achieve continued and improved compliance: Remove "Death Report" from verbiage on outgoing fax cover sheet to Community Care Licensing (CCL), unless facility is in fact reporting a resident death. Professional cleaning monthly. Licensee will submit professional cleaning invoice to LPA Ivey Canady monthly until further notice from CCL. Provide progress reports, regarding all resident rashes, every 2 weeks beginning 6/13/2022. Documentation to be sent to attention LPA Ivey Canady via fax. Maintain documentation in residents' file to show all medications received. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 6, no deficiencies were cited during this visit. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Emmanuel Diala. A copy of this report was provided via email and an electronic email read receipt confirms receiving these documents. Administrator Emmanuel Diala will sign the document and send signed copy to LPA Ivey Canady at jamie.ivey-canady@dss.ca.gov.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 1, 2022
May 20, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio and LPA Jamie Ivey Canady arrived to the facility unannounced to conduct the required annual inspection. LPAs were met by Staff 2 (S2), whom was not wearing a mask once LPAs entered the home. LPAs requested Administrator Joyce Diala to be present during the visit. Administrator arrived 20 minutes later. Upon entering the facility, LPAs observed the home to be malodorous, a smell resembling feces, fish, and dust. LPAs observed a resident in the home at the dinning table. She appeared to be eating breakfast. There were food pieces on the floor, food all over the table, and crumbs from other residents from previous meals. LPAs started to wipe down the kitchen countertop to set up equipment. LPAs observed tiny unidentified bugs, old food scraps, dried sticky residue, and dust after wiping the counters. The counter tops were filled with old plates, used plastic containers, foil wrapped plates with food residue, and used hand towels. Fire extinguishers was up to date with last check on 03/12/2022. No emergency exits were obstructed. Facility temperature in the home was 74* degrees, which is within the required range. The facility was observed to have an adequate supply of non-perishable and perishable foods. Bedrooms had necessary furniture: bed, chair, night stand, light, and a dresser. Bathrooms had a trash can with a close lid, paper towels, and soap. 2 bedrooms and 1 bathroom were observed to have holes in the wall caused by the door knob. Per California Code of Regulations (CCRs) - Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, deficiencies were found and can be found on LIC 809-D. Failure to correct the deficiency may result in civil penalties. An exit interview was conducted. Administrator Joyce Diala refused to sign. Signature will be obtained on the hard printed copy and put in the facility file. Administrator to send signed copy via fax to the department by COB 05/20/22.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 20, 2022

4 of 6 beds were occupied at the December 13, 2022 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Daniel Residential Care Home LLC, licensed since 2016.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2016, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
10
Total complaints
3
Substantiated allegations
2
Type A citations
3
Type B citations
0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2016, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations30
Type B citations00
Substantiated allegations20
Total complaints30

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Daniel Residential Care Home

Is Daniel Residential Care Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Daniel Residential Care Home licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Daniel Residential Care Home been cited?

3 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Daniel Residential Care Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.

What does Daniel Residential Care Home cost?

$3,550 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $2,900–$4,400. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 10 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 21 other homes of a similar licensed size in Sacramento that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,149 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $3,800 (n = 21 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Daniel Residential Care Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Daniel Residential Care Home LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - South Sacramento is 1.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Daniel Residential Care Home keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

Daniel Residential Care Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “DANIEL RESIDENTIAL CARE HOME LLC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #347005713. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Daniel Residential Care Home LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 3 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2016, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is May 29, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Sacramento County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.5 mi

    Prasad's Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $3,950 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,200–$4,850

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.9 mi

    Carmen's Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $3,400 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $2,750–$4,200

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.9 mi

    Golden Residence Senior Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,150 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,150

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 0.9 mi

    Happy Life Care Living

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,250 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,250

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 1.1 mi

    Golden Residence Senior Care II

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,200 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,150

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Sacramento · 1.1 mi

    Mandy Care Home

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,350 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,550–$5,350

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Sacramento County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
DR

Call Daniel Residential Care Home

Sacramento · Licensed for 6

(916) 717-3263

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Daniel Residential Care Home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages