Carlton Plaza Of Elk Grove is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Elk Grove, Sacramento County, California — state license #347005464, licensed for 180 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 29 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated October 9, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

12 homes in view

Carlton Plaza Of Elk Grove

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 180 residents · Elk Grove, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #347005464, held since 2015 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
6915 Elk Grove Blvd. · Elk Grove, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 714-2404
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 180 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
LICENSED TO SERVE UP TO 180 NONAMBULATORY RESIDENTS OF WHICH 25 RESIDENTS CAN BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR (15) RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 35 times and filed 29 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on October 9, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
June 16, 2026
Occupancy at the October 9, 2025 visit
133 of 180 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 12 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 23, 2021 to October 9, 2025. 12 of the 12 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unsubstantiated” (7). 12 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 12 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 15 of 29 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20255 state visits · 6 documents
Oct 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not administering medication(s) to resident in care as prescribed.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Triel Lindstrom arrived unannounced to open this complaint. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Jennell Revera and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of record review and interviews. LPA Moleski interviewed Revera and two staff members (S1-S2). In an interview, the facility's medication manager (S1) admitted that there had been a medication error for a resident (R1). S1 said that R1 had not been receiving a medication used to treat Parkinson's disease for several days due to an error in transcribing the prescription order into the facility's medication administration records (MARs). S1 said that R1 missed four daily doses of the medication between September 18 and September 25. [continued on 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251003122158
Oct 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident suffered injuries due to staff neglect

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Jennell Revera and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Revera, 18 staff members (S1-S18), and one resident (R1). LPA Moleski reviewed an incident report log for R1 dating between 5/22/24 and 10/19/24. On 5/22, R1 was using their wheelchair as a walker, causing R1 to lose their balance and fall. R1 did not hit their head but had some bruising on their left hand and right leg and some redness on their back. On 7/28, R1 suffered a fall which was captured on camera. R1 tried to sit in their wheelchair, but missed and fell on their left side. R1 had no apparent injuries at the time. However, on 7/30, a staff member observed some bruising on R1's left hip. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 16, 2025 · control 27-AS-20240823101614
20245 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident's room was kept clean

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Jennell Revera and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews and record review. LPA Moleski conducted interviews with Revera, a resident (R1), three family members of R1 (R1’s RPs 1-3) and 11 staff members (S1-S11). LPA Moleski reviewed an internal facility incident report, dated 8/8/24, which described R1 experiencing increased confusion. R1’s responsible parties called for emergency medical services, and R1 was taken to the hospital for treatment, according to the internal incident report. The Community Care Licensing Division did not receive an incident report regarding this incident, as required per 22 CCR 87211(a)(1)(D). This deficiency will be addressed in a subsequent case management visit. [continued on 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240813084041
Dec 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 1, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate food service Staff did not meet resident's toileting needs Staff did not meet resident's showering needs Staff did not treat resident with respect Staff overcharged resident Staff mismanaged resident's medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Jennell Revera and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Revera, 10 staff members (S1-S10), four residents (R1-R4), and a resident’s responsible party (R1’s RP). In an interview, R1 said that R1 liked the food at the facility, and always gets enough to eat. R1 said they had not missed any meals at the facility. R1 said that they preferred to have meals delivered to their room, rather than going downstairs to eat. R1 said staff assisted them with showers, and said they received showers about once every other day. R1 said they received enough showers, and in fact would prefer fewer showers, as R1 is often tired in the mornings. [continued on 9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240327145359
May 9, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not safeguard residents belongings

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with director of resident services Andrea Quintanilla and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of observation, interviews, and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed facility administrator Jennell Revera, two staff members (S1-S2), and a former resident’s responsible party (R1’s RP). LPA Moleski reviewed a death report for a resident (R1) dated 4/17/24. The death report states that R1’s RP notified the facility on 4/7/24 that two of R1’s rings were missing. Staff searched various areas for the missing rings, but were unable to locate the rings, according to the death report. Local law enforcement was notified and a report number was provided. LPA Moleski reviewed an incident report dated 4/25/24, stating that R1’s RP notified staff that three of R1’s rings were missing. [continued on 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 9, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240501152638
Jan 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 10, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Due to lack of staffing, staff do not answer resident call buttons timely

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with director of resident services Andrea Quintanilla and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of record review and interviews with staff and residents. During an interview, Jennell Revera said staff are expected to respond to pendant calls within 15 minutes. Revera said staff hours were recently reduced. LPA Moleski reviewed 30 days of call button responses for a resident (R1), dated from July 30, 2023 to August 29, 2023. [continued on 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 10, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230823160535
Aug 17, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations5typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints8typical 2
Total complaints12typical 7
State visits on file35typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2015.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20255612024572202388220224502021330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 714-2404

Is Carlton Plaza Of Elk Grove licensed?

Yes — Carlton Plaza Of Elk Grove is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Elk Grove (Sacramento County): California license #347005464, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 180 residents. State records list 29 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated October 9, 2025, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Carlton Plaza Of Elk Grove care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Carlton Plaza Of Elk Grove with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordLICENSED TO SERVE UP TO 180 NONAMBULATORY RESIDENTS OF WHICH 25 RESIDENTS CAN BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR (15) RESIDENTS.

How much does Carlton Plaza Of Elk Grove cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Carlton Plaza Of Elk Grove's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Carlton Plaza Of Elk Grove accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Carlton Plaza Of Elk Grove is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

133 of 180 beds occupied (74%) when the state visited on October 9, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Carlton Plaza Of Elk Grove?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 35 state visits and 29 dated documents since 2021 for Carlton Plaza Of Elk Grove; 12 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 9, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

12 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not administering medication(s) to resident in care as prescribed.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Triel Lindstrom arrived unannounced to open this complaint. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Jennell Revera and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of record review and interviews. LPA Moleski interviewed Revera and two staff members (S1-S2). In an interview, the facility's medication manager (S1) admitted that there had been a medication error for a resident (R1). S1 said that R1 had not been receiving a medication used to treat Parkinson's disease for several days due to an error in transcribing the prescription order into the facility's medication administration records (MARs). S1 said that R1 missed four daily doses of the medication between September 18 and September 25. [continued on 9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 9, 2025 · control 27-AS-20251003122158
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident suffered injuries due to staff neglect
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Jennell Revera and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Revera, 18 staff members (S1-S18), and one resident (R1). LPA Moleski reviewed an incident report log for R1 dating between 5/22/24 and 10/19/24. On 5/22, R1 was using their wheelchair as a walker, causing R1 to lose their balance and fall. R1 did not hit their head but had some bruising on their left hand and right leg and some redness on their back. On 7/28, R1 suffered a fall which was captured on camera. R1 tried to sit in their wheelchair, but missed and fell on their left side. R1 had no apparent injuries at the time. However, on 7/30, a staff member observed some bruising on R1's left hip. [continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 16, 2025 · control 27-AS-20240823101614

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident's room was kept clean
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Jennell Revera and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews and record review. LPA Moleski conducted interviews with Revera, a resident (R1), three family members of R1 (R1’s RPs 1-3) and 11 staff members (S1-S11). LPA Moleski reviewed an internal facility incident report, dated 8/8/24, which described R1 experiencing increased confusion. R1’s responsible parties called for emergency medical services, and R1 was taken to the hospital for treatment, according to the internal incident report. The Community Care Licensing Division did not receive an incident report regarding this incident, as required per 22 CCR 87211(a)(1)(D). This deficiency will be addressed in a subsequent case management visit. [continued on 9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 30, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240813084041
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate food service Staff did not meet resident's toileting needs Staff did not meet resident's showering needs Staff did not treat resident with respect Staff overcharged resident Staff mismanaged resident's medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Jennell Revera and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, observation and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed Revera, 10 staff members (S1-S10), four residents (R1-R4), and a resident’s responsible party (R1’s RP). In an interview, R1 said that R1 liked the food at the facility, and always gets enough to eat. R1 said they had not missed any meals at the facility. R1 said that they preferred to have meals delivered to their room, rather than going downstairs to eat. R1 said staff assisted them with showers, and said they received showers about once every other day. R1 said they received enough showers, and in fact would prefer fewer showers, as R1 is often tired in the mornings. [continued on 9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 1, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240327145359
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not safeguard residents belongings
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with director of resident services Andrea Quintanilla and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of observation, interviews, and record review. LPA Moleski interviewed facility administrator Jennell Revera, two staff members (S1-S2), and a former resident’s responsible party (R1’s RP). LPA Moleski reviewed a death report for a resident (R1) dated 4/17/24. The death report states that R1’s RP notified the facility on 4/7/24 that two of R1’s rings were missing. Staff searched various areas for the missing rings, but were unable to locate the rings, according to the death report. Local law enforcement was notified and a report number was provided. LPA Moleski reviewed an incident report dated 4/25/24, stating that R1’s RP notified staff that three of R1’s rings were missing. [continued on 9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 9, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240501152638

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedDue to lack of staffing, staff do not answer resident call buttons timely
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with director of resident services Andrea Quintanilla and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of record review and interviews with staff and residents. During an interview, Jennell Revera said staff are expected to respond to pendant calls within 15 minutes. Revera said staff hours were recently reduced. LPA Moleski reviewed 30 days of call button responses for a resident (R1), dated from July 30, 2023 to August 29, 2023. [continued on 9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 10, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230823160535
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not following infection control procedures
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Vincent Moleski and Jason Lund arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPAs Moleski and Lund met with administrator Jennell Revera and explained the purpose of the visit. This complaint was investigated by LPAs Moleski and Lund. The investigation consisted of nine staff interviews (S1-S9), ten resident interviews, interviews with administrator Revera, record review of facility infection control procedures, record review of Carlton Senior Living policy regarding infection control, and record review of PPE invoices. Interviews with S1-S8 indicated that assisted living staff experienced a shortage of gowns during a one-to-two-day period during the recent outbreak of COVID-19. S9 worked in memory care and was not aware of the shortage in assisted living. [Continued on 812-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 19, 2023 · control 27-AS-20230126184225

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 35 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
8
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
12
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
35
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Carlton Plaza Of Elk Grove?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Carlton Senior Living, Llc, who operates 7 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 714-2404
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Carlton Plaza Of Elk Grove? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.