Bruceville Point is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Elk Grove, Sacramento County, California — state license #342701040, licensed for 200 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 13 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 2, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

15 homes in view

Bruceville Point

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 200 residents · Elk Grove, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342701040, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
9730 Backer Ranch Road · Elk Grove, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 226-5300
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 160 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 10 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 40 AMBULATORY AND 160 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10.BEDRIDDEN ONLY 1ST FLOOR. NON-AMB 1ST & 2ND FLOOR. AMB 1ST, 2ND, 3RD FLOOR.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 14 times and filed 13 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 2, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 2, 2026
Occupancy at the January 9, 2026 visit
134 of 200 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 31, 2023 to January 9, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 13 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not dispense medications as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sommer Hayes and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Stephen Richardson arrived at the facility to complete a complaint investigation regarding the allegation noted above. LPA and LPM met with Marianne Richardson, Executive Director and stated the purpose of this visit. LPA and LPM arrived to complete a complaint investigation for an allegation that facility staff failed to dispense medications as prescribed to former resident, Resident 1 (R1). The Reporting Party 1 (RP1) alleged that after the facility assumed responsibility for not administering R1’s medication Levothyroxine for one week, there were ongoing issues with medication availability, timeliness, and staff competency. RP1 reported difficulty obtaining PRN medications, concerns about staff responsiveness, and stated that R1’s laboratory values related to the missed medication, Levothyroxine became significantly elevated during the period of facility medication management. Continued on 9099C Substanthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 9, 2026 · control 27-AS-20250724114324
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Resident missed medications. Staff do not give resident medication timely. Resident being charged for services not rendered.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA Viarella met with Eric Hostetter and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews with Staff 1 (S1), Staff 2 (S2), Resident 1 (R1), and a review of facility records. The following has been determined as it relates to the aforementioned allegations. On 01/23/25, LPA Christina Valerio interviewed facility staff. S1 informed LPA that residents are billed for extra charges if they purchase items outside of dinning hours from the bistro or bar and if they chose the option to get their meals to go. The facility charges $1 if a resident chose to have their meal for to-go rather than eat in the dining halls. The facility implemented this policy to create an incentive for residents to dine with others. Residents will also be charged for any alcohol that is purchased with their meal. S1 stated residents are charged a base rate for their room and can be chargedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 19, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250114162347
20241 state visit · 2 documents
Apr 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was left unattended without staff supervision resulting in hospital visit

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with designated staff person Misty Veloz, and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department has determined the following as it relates the allegation of: Resident was left unattended without staff supervision resulting in hospital visit. The investigation consisted of interview with responsible parties, interview with facility staff, video recording review, and facility records review. On 11/06/23, LPA Valerio conducted a 10-Day Visit after being informed that Resident 1 (R1) had fallen on a Friday night and was not found by staff until Sunday morning. R1 did not have the call pendent on one's self to call for help. On Sunday morning, R1 was found to be dehydrated and had not eating or taken medications. R1 was taken to the hospital right away. Continues on LIC 9099 - C... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 26, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231105181914
Dec 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 31, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff stealing residents personal belongings.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio and LPA Arvin Villanueva arrived unannounced to the home to conduct a 10-Day Visit/Complaint Investigation. LPAs were met by Administrator Eric Hostetter, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs obtained copies of Resident Roster, Staff Schedule, and Theft and Loss Records. LPAs interviewed Facility Staff (S1 - S4), a family member (FM), and Residents (R1 - R7). Based on interviews, S1 stated there have been reports of items missing. S1 stated the facility maintains a Theft and Loss Record for any items reported missing, stolen, or loss. In addition, the facility reports the items missing to the Elk Grove Police Department. LPA obtained copies for reference. S2 and S3 stated residents have told them items go missing; however, they have not taken any items. S2 and S3 go inside resident rooms while residents are present and at times where residents are not in the room. S4 stated a resident reported missing items and S4 does not knowthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231023110153
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints4typical 7
State visits on file14typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263312025330202412020233402022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 226-5300

Is Bruceville Point licensed?

Yes — Bruceville Point is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Elk Grove (Sacramento County): California license #342701040, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 200 residents. State records list 13 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 2, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Bruceville Point care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Bruceville Point with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 40 AMBULATORY AND 160 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 10.BEDRIDDEN ONLY 1ST FLOOR. NON-AMB 1ST & 2ND FLOOR. AMB 1ST, 2ND, 3RD FLOOR.

How much does Bruceville Point cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Bruceville Point's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Bruceville Point accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Bruceville Point is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

134 of 200 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on January 9, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Bruceville Point?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 14 state visits and 13 dated documents since 2022 for Bruceville Point; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated January 9, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not dispense medications as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sommer Hayes and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Stephen Richardson arrived at the facility to complete a complaint investigation regarding the allegation noted above. LPA and LPM met with Marianne Richardson, Executive Director and stated the purpose of this visit. LPA and LPM arrived to complete a complaint investigation for an allegation that facility staff failed to dispense medications as prescribed to former resident, Resident 1 (R1). The Reporting Party 1 (RP1) alleged that after the facility assumed responsibility for not administering R1’s medication Levothyroxine for one week, there were ongoing issues with medication availability, timeliness, and staff competency. RP1 reported difficulty obtaining PRN medications, concerns about staff responsiveness, and stated that R1’s laboratory values related to the missed medication, Levothyroxine became significantly elevated during the period of facility medication management. Continued on 9099C SubstanCDSS inspection report, January 9, 2026 · control 27-AS-20250724114324

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident missed medications. Staff do not give resident medication timely. Resident being charged for services not rendered.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Viarella arrived unannounced to deliver complaint findings. LPA Viarella met with Eric Hostetter and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews with Staff 1 (S1), Staff 2 (S2), Resident 1 (R1), and a review of facility records. The following has been determined as it relates to the aforementioned allegations. On 01/23/25, LPA Christina Valerio interviewed facility staff. S1 informed LPA that residents are billed for extra charges if they purchase items outside of dinning hours from the bistro or bar and if they chose the option to get their meals to go. The facility charges $1 if a resident chose to have their meal for to-go rather than eat in the dining halls. The facility implemented this policy to create an incentive for residents to dine with others. Residents will also be charged for any alcohol that is purchased with their meal. S1 stated residents are charged a base rate for their room and can be chargedCDSS inspection report, February 19, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250114162347

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was left unattended without staff supervision resulting in hospital visit
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings. LPA met with designated staff person Misty Veloz, and explained the purpose of the visit. The Department has determined the following as it relates the allegation of: Resident was left unattended without staff supervision resulting in hospital visit. The investigation consisted of interview with responsible parties, interview with facility staff, video recording review, and facility records review. On 11/06/23, LPA Valerio conducted a 10-Day Visit after being informed that Resident 1 (R1) had fallen on a Friday night and was not found by staff until Sunday morning. R1 did not have the call pendent on one's self to call for help. On Sunday morning, R1 was found to be dehydrated and had not eating or taken medications. R1 was taken to the hospital right away. Continues on LIC 9099 - C... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 26, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231105181914
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff stealing residents personal belongings.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christina Valerio and LPA Arvin Villanueva arrived unannounced to the home to conduct a 10-Day Visit/Complaint Investigation. LPAs were met by Administrator Eric Hostetter, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPAs obtained copies of Resident Roster, Staff Schedule, and Theft and Loss Records. LPAs interviewed Facility Staff (S1 - S4), a family member (FM), and Residents (R1 - R7). Based on interviews, S1 stated there have been reports of items missing. S1 stated the facility maintains a Theft and Loss Record for any items reported missing, stolen, or loss. In addition, the facility reports the items missing to the Elk Grove Police Department. LPA obtained copies for reference. S2 and S3 stated residents have told them items go missing; however, they have not taken any items. S2 and S3 go inside resident rooms while residents are present and at times where residents are not in the room. S4 stated a resident reported missing items and S4 does not knowCDSS inspection report, October 31, 2023 · control 27-AS-20231023110153

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 14 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
14
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 226-5300
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Bruceville Point? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.