Angels Assisted Living,inc. is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville, Sacramento County, California — state license #345003013, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 18 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated May 15, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

14 homes in view

Angels Assisted Living,inc.

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Roseville, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #345003013, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1526 Crestmont Oak Drive · Roseville, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 841-9449
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 5 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5. ROOM#5 IS THE BEDRIDDEN &ROOMS 1,2,4,6, IS NON-AMBULATORY.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 25 times and filed 18 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 15, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 15, 2026
Occupancy at the February 12, 2026 visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 7 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 2, 2024 to February 12, 2026. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 7 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 16 of 18 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
May 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility has insufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents in care

*** Amended 4/9/26 *** On 2/12/26 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to Simranjeet BHatia by phone to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. This complaint was a continuation, with new allegations ,to the previous investigation number 59-AS-20250207161111 The department reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted extensive interviews.The department finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. At the time of R1’s fall on 10/24/24, S1 was the lone caregiver for 4 residents. Statements by the Administrator were that S2 was present in the home as well. A review of criminal records clearance for S1 and S2, at the time of the 10/24/24 incident found that neither S1 nor S2 were background check cleared to work at the home at that time. Therefore, sufficient and authorized staff were not present. Report continued Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251203132905
Jan 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20257 state visits · 9 documents
Dec 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff not repositioning resident per care needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings into allegation listed above. LPA spoke to administrator Simranjit Bhatia during today’s visit. LPA investigated allegation, “Staff not repositioning resident per care needs”. LPA reviewed facility documents and interviewed staff and residents in care. Reporting party indicated that R1 reported that staff do not reposition them which causes them discomfort. LPA interviewed caregivers in which they stated they repositioned R1 every hour, unless R1 refused. Caregivers stated resident had behaviors of yelling out and being combative during care. LPA interviewed 2 residents in care in which they stated they heard R1 yell out from their room, especially during the night. Continuation on 9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251021163042
Dec 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining a fracture due to a fall. Staff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining multiple pressure injuries. Staff neglect led to the serious hospitalization of a resident. Facility did not notify responsible parties of hospitalization.

On 10/28/2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Lavinia Muscan and Graham Gunby arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings into the allegations listed above and met with Caregiver Edghard Zadrach. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: **Report continued on 9099-C** Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 28, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250207161111
Jul 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure staff dispensing medication to residents are appropriately trained. Licensee does not ensure facility has adequate supplies to provide care to residents.

On July 23, 2025, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Laura Munoz, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Troy Ordonez, and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lavinia Muscan arrived at the facility unannounced to investigate complaint regarding the allegations listed above and met with Administrator Simranjit Bhatia. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: **Report continued on 9099-C** Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 23, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250717160132
May 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful eviction. Do to neglect, resident sustained a pressure injury.

On 05/28/25, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Talwinder Bains and Lavinia Muscan arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings into the allegations listed above and met Administrator Simranjit Bhatia and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: **Report continued on 9099-C** Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250318082622
May 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure facility has adequate food supply

Amended: On October 2, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) DeAnna Williams-Lyons arrived unannounced to deliver findings for complaint #59-AS-20240821160241. LPA met with Michelle , and informed her the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint alleging staff does not ensure facility has adequate food supply, Staff are not properly trained, and staff does not properly document resident's medications. LPA investigated the allegations by reviewing food receipt, trainings forms and MARs (Medication Administration Records) log. Regarding the allegation that staff does not ensure facility has adequate food supply, LPA interviewed 2 staff and 5 resident. All residents stated there’s always food in the house. According to 5 residents, the licensee will get all residents grocery list on a weekly basis and purchase everything on the lists. Kitchen area was toured along with food storage units. LPA observed at this time and during prior visits made out to this facility, that fothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240821160241
Oct 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee does not ensure that staff have a criminal clearance

Amended to make Public: On October 2, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Anna Williams-Lyons arrived unannounced to deliver findings for complaint # 59-AS-20240906113641. LPA met with Michelle Fraunhoffer, Caregiver, and informed her the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint alleging the Licensee does not ensure that staff have a criminal clearance, Licensee does not ensure that staff have a medical clearance, and Licensee did not report an incident to the appropriate parties. LPA investigated the complaint by reviewing resident and facility files and conducting interviews with residents and staff. LPA also obtained staff schedules and rosters and other documentation pertinent to the complaint. LPA reviewed the facility’s active employee roster. On the active roster, there was 15 potential staff that could be hired. The facility has employed 7 out of the 15 on the list. The 7 employees hired had criminal background clearances from the department in their emplothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 2, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240906113641
Sep 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations6typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints7typical 0
Total complaints7typical 0
State visits on file25typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026331202579120243402023220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 841-9449

Is Angels Assisted Living,inc. licensed?

Yes — Angels Assisted Living,inc. is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville (Sacramento County): California license #345003013, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 18 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 15, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Angels Assisted Living,inc. care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Angels Assisted Living,inc. with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 5. ROOM#5 IS THE BEDRIDDEN &ROOMS 1,2,4,6, IS NON-AMBULATORY.

How much does Angels Assisted Living,inc. cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Angels Assisted Living,inc.'s monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Angels Assisted Living,inc. accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Angels Assisted Living,inc. is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on February 12, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Angels Assisted Living,inc.?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 25 state visits and 18 dated documents since 2023 for Angels Assisted Living,inc.; 7 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 12, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

7 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility has insufficient staff to meet the needs of the residents in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
*** Amended 4/9/26 *** On 2/12/26 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to Simranjeet BHatia by phone to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. This complaint was a continuation, with new allegations ,to the previous investigation number 59-AS-20250207161111 The department reviewed resident records, facility records and conducted extensive interviews.The department finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. At the time of R1’s fall on 10/24/24, S1 was the lone caregiver for 4 residents. Statements by the Administrator were that S2 was present in the home as well. A review of criminal records clearance for S1 and S2, at the time of the 10/24/24 incident found that neither S1 nor S2 were background check cleared to work at the home at that time. Therefore, sufficient and authorized staff were not present. Report continued SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 12, 2026 · control 59-AS-20251203132905

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff not repositioning resident per care needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to deliver complaint investigation findings into allegation listed above. LPA spoke to administrator Simranjit Bhatia during today’s visit. LPA investigated allegation, “Staff not repositioning resident per care needs”. LPA reviewed facility documents and interviewed staff and residents in care. Reporting party indicated that R1 reported that staff do not reposition them which causes them discomfort. LPA interviewed caregivers in which they stated they repositioned R1 every hour, unless R1 refused. Caregivers stated resident had behaviors of yelling out and being combative during care. LPA interviewed 2 residents in care in which they stated they heard R1 yell out from their room, especially during the night. Continuation on 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 16, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251021163042
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining a fracture due to a fall. Staff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining multiple pressure injuries. Staff neglect led to the serious hospitalization of a resident. Facility did not notify responsible parties of hospitalization.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 10/28/2025, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Lavinia Muscan and Graham Gunby arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings into the allegations listed above and met with Caregiver Edghard Zadrach. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: **Report continued on 9099-C** SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 28, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250207161111
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure staff dispensing medication to residents are appropriately trained. Licensee does not ensure facility has adequate supplies to provide care to residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On July 23, 2025, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Laura Munoz, Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Troy Ordonez, and Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Lavinia Muscan arrived at the facility unannounced to investigate complaint regarding the allegations listed above and met with Administrator Simranjit Bhatia. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: **Report continued on 9099-C** UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 23, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250717160132
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful eviction. Do to neglect, resident sustained a pressure injury.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 05/28/25, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Talwinder Bains and Lavinia Muscan arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings into the allegations listed above and met Administrator Simranjit Bhatia and explained the purpose of today's visit. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: **Report continued on 9099-C** UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 28, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250318082622

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure facility has adequate food supply
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Amended: On October 2, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) DeAnna Williams-Lyons arrived unannounced to deliver findings for complaint #59-AS-20240821160241. LPA met with Michelle , and informed her the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint alleging staff does not ensure facility has adequate food supply, Staff are not properly trained, and staff does not properly document resident's medications. LPA investigated the allegations by reviewing food receipt, trainings forms and MARs (Medication Administration Records) log. Regarding the allegation that staff does not ensure facility has adequate food supply, LPA interviewed 2 staff and 5 resident. All residents stated there’s always food in the house. According to 5 residents, the licensee will get all residents grocery list on a weekly basis and purchase everything on the lists. Kitchen area was toured along with food storage units. LPA observed at this time and during prior visits made out to this facility, that foCDSS inspection report, October 2, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240821160241
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee does not ensure that staff have a criminal clearance
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Amended to make Public: On October 2, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) De Anna Williams-Lyons arrived unannounced to deliver findings for complaint # 59-AS-20240906113641. LPA met with Michelle Fraunhoffer, Caregiver, and informed her the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint alleging the Licensee does not ensure that staff have a criminal clearance, Licensee does not ensure that staff have a medical clearance, and Licensee did not report an incident to the appropriate parties. LPA investigated the complaint by reviewing resident and facility files and conducting interviews with residents and staff. LPA also obtained staff schedules and rosters and other documentation pertinent to the complaint. LPA reviewed the facility’s active employee roster. On the active roster, there was 15 potential staff that could be hired. The facility has employed 7 out of the 15 on the list. The 7 employees hired had criminal background clearances from the department in their emploCDSS inspection report, October 2, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240906113641

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 25 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
6
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
7
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
7
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
25
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 841-9449
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Angels Assisted Living,inc.? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.