Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Robert Creek Villa I

Small home·Licensed for 6·Citrus Heights, California

Licensed since 2020Licence #342700877
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,050 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,300–$4,950
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit6 of 6 beds occupiedJune 17, 2025 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 26, 2026CDSS inspection record

Robert Creek Villa I is a small care home in Citrus Heights — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2020. Dementia care and bedridden care are not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Robert Creek Villa I

Is Robert Creek Villa I licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Robert Creek Villa I licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Robert Creek Villa I been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Robert Creek Villa I still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Robert Creek Villa I cost?

$4,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,300–$4,950. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 5 other homes of a similar licensed size in Citrus Heights that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,625 a month, and the middle figure is $4,800 (n = 5 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Robert Creek Villa I take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Robert Creek Villa Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital - Roseville is 2.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Robert Creek Villa I keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Robert Creek Villa I license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ROBERT CREEK VILLA I”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #342700877. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Robert Creek Villa Inc., per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 26, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careNot on file · ask the home
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 3 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY. BEDROOMS #1-6 APPROVED FOR RESIDENTS. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 3.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

4 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation not on file

    Ask: “If memory loss develops, what would change — and when would a move be needed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,050a month to start

Likely $3,300–$4,950

From 13 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,050a month

Likely $3,300–$5,150

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,050likely $3,300–$4,950

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,300–$5,150
$4,050
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,900–$8,350
$6,050
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 13 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

13 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$4,950.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 13 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 8135 Robert Creek Villa Court, Citrus Heights, CA 95610Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2020. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated August 26, 2026.

On file since
2021
State visits
10
Most recent visit
August 26, 2026
Occupied · June 17, 2025 visit
6 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 2 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated May 17, 2023 to June 17, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 2 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2020.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020252302024110202322020222202021110

The last 36 months — 6 of 10 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Aug 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Annual/Random

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual. LPA met with Mariana "Mimi" Musca, Administrator Designee/caregiver, and stated the reason for the inspection. Also present was staff, Beata Kratschmer. The administrator was out of town and unable to attend. There are (5) residents currently. (1) resident is under hospice care. Residents were resting in their rooms. LPA and Administrator toured the interior/exterior of the facility including the common areas, (6) private resident bedrooms, (4) of which have a private bath, (1) additional full bathroom, kitchen, and garage/locked laundry area. LPA observed the facility to be clean, in good repair and odor-free, and the bathrooms to have the necessary grab bars, slip-resistant flooring, and hygiene supplies. There is sufficient 2+day perishable, including lots of fresh produce, and 7+day non-perishable supply of food. The facility prepares fresh food daily. Sharps and medications are locked in a cabinet near the kitchen and toxins are locked in the garage. Hot water temperature measured 116.6*F in the kitchen. The fire extinguisher was last serviced 6/1/2026, and the smoke/monoxide alarms are working. Inside temperature measured 78*F. All required postings are visible in the common area- an updated SOC341 was provided. There are (2) unlocked exits and no pools. There is a small table and chairs by the front door. All exit doors have an auditory alert and exit signs. There are non-audio cameras in the common areas. LPA reviewed (2) resident files and (3) staff files. Files are organized and contain current paperwork, including care plans. Medications were reviewed for (2) residents are being administered per orders. Documentation (MAR) is also current. Staff are completing the required training each year and have current First Aid/CPR certifications. RCFE Admin cert #7035965740 (exp 11/2/2027). There are no deficiencies observed during today's inspection, and no citations are being issued in this report. Exit interview. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 26, 2026

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

20252 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual. LPA met with Mariana "Mimi" Musca, caregiver, and stated the reason for the inspection. At the start of the inspection, (5) residents were present. The sixth resident returned at 1:50 pm after attending their day/health care program. The facility is licensed for (6) non-ambulatory residents and has a hospice waiver for (3). LPA was advised there are currently (0) residents under hospice care. LPA and Administrator toured the interior/exterior of the facility including the common areas, (6) resident bedrooms with private bath, (2) full bathrooms, kitchen, (3) staff rooms and garage/locked laundry area. LPA observed the facility to be clean, in good repair and odor-free, and the bathrooms to have the necessary grab bars, slip-resistant flooring, and hygiene supplies. There is sufficient 2+day perishable and 7+day non-perishable supply of food. Sharps and medications are locked in a cabinet near the kitchen and toxins are locked in the garage. Hot water temperature measured 114*F in a resident bathroom. Fire extinguisher last serviced 6/24/25, and the smoke/monoxide alarm was tested/working. Inside temperature measured 80*F. There is a First Aid kit on site and sufficient paper/incontinent products. All required postings are visible in the common area. There is a covered patio table outside, (1) unlocked exit and no pools. Updated land line contact obtained as well as an updated copy of LIC500, LIC308 and current liability insurance. (2) resident files and (5) staff files were reviewed. Files were organized and contained current/complete documentation. Staff has completed the initial/continuing required training and has current First Aid/CPR. The administrator's certificate is pending renewal. The Plan of Operation contains documentation related to updated Dementia care regulations. Medications were reviewed for (1) residents- orders match medications administered and documentation is current. There are no deficiencies observed during today's inspection, and no citations are being issued in this report. Exit interview. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025
Sep 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Post Licensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual. LPA met with Mariana "Mimi" Musca, caregiver, and stated reason for the inspection. At the start of the inspection, (5) residents were present. The sixth resident returned at 1:50 pm after attending their day/health care program. This report is being created to clear the Post-Licensing inspection in the system. There are no deficiencies issued in this report. Exit interview. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025
Jun 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Questionable death. Staff did not seek timely medical care for resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to deliver investigative findings to a complaint received on May 5, 2025, and met with Mariana Musca, caregiver, who contacted Administrator, Adina Sbingu. LPA stated the reason for today's inspection. The Administrator arrived around 11:05 am. Also present was staff, Beata Kratschmer. LPA was advised (2) residents were attending their day program, (3) were resting in their rooms and (1) was watching television in the common area. During the investigation, the Department interviewed the Administrator, (2) staff, resident (R1's) responsible person, and reviewed documenation related to resident (R1), including the county death certificate. The results of the investigation are as follows: Resident moved in on January 30, 2024, with a diagnosis of Dementia, Coronary Artery Disease, Hypertension, a history of stroke. Additionally, the physician’s report (dated 1/26/2024) notes that resident’s heart was working at 30-35% capacity, resident had Atrial Fibrillation, could be confused but was able to communicate their needs. *cont on 9099C-1.. Unsubstantiated 9099C-1.. The Pre-Appraisal indicates resident had a pacemaker and had memory issues since it was installed in December 2023, was able to ambulate, showed anxiety and depression, was independent with ADL’s, and needed minimal assistance with eating and medications. Allegation: Questionable death. The allegation states that staff indicated they checked on resident (R1) on the morning of April 22, 2025 (0730 hours) to wash and assist resident but (R1) did not want to get up so staff gave (R1) a bed bath. Staff (S1) stated she and staff (S2) later checked in on (R1) again at approximately 0815 hours and observed (R1) was having trouble breathing. Staff (S1) stated that after a minute or two, (R1) stopped breathing entirely and at that point she called 911 and was given instructions for CPR. The Department investigated the above allegation and obtained the county death certificate which lists the following conditions that contributed to (R1’s) death: Cerebrovascular Accident (lasting minutes), Myocardial Infarction (lasting hours), Chronic Kidney Disease and Hypertension (lasting years). (R1’s) death is recorded at 9:08 am on April 22, 2025 There were no other health conditions that contributed to or resulted in the cause of (R1’s) death that was reported to the Sacramento County Coroner’s office, and there was also no biopsy or autopsy performed. The Administrator explained how (R1) had been refusing medications, starting on 4/7/25 through 4/22/25. LPA was provided with documentation showing (R1) refused ordered medications in the morning and evening on: 4/7/25; 4/9/25; 4/11/25, 4/15/25; refused medications in the morning on 4/10/25; 4/12/25, 4/13/25, 4/14/25, 4/16/25, 4/17/25, and 4/20/25; and refused medications in the evening on 4/19/25. The facility submitted an incident report for an incident involving (R1) calling 9-1-1 on 4/17/25. The Administrator and report indicated that it is not certain what (R1) reported to 9-1-1; however, the fire department came out to evaluate (R1), who was cleared and not taken to the hospital at that time. The Administrator stated that 9-1-1 left the home as “(R1) didn't want to go to the hospital", adding that (R1’s) doctor spoke to them later that day and then on Sunday, 4/20/25, advising (R1) they need to be sent out for a "5150", or mental health evaluation. The incident report further states that (R1’s) Psychiatrist communicated with the responsible person that a 5150 may need to be requested if resident’s behavior continues and because resident was refusing medication, contributing to (R1) pretending to "push a pen in the head" of another resident (R2), but no contact was made. *cont on 9099C-2.. 9099C-2 ..The Administrator stated she spoke to the responsible person, on Sunday, April 20, 2025 and confirmed the police arrived at the facility on that day (10:30 am) and took (R1) to a local hospital. LPA reviewed a second incident report for an incident occurring on 4/20/25 (8:00 am). Staff called (R1) for breakfast and found resident in their bathroom filling the garbage can with water, which flooded the room. (R1) was sent to the hospital for a mental health evaluation. On 4/21/25, the administrator received a call from the hospital that (R1) was cleared for discharge, and their responsible person had requested resident be put on the same medication dosages prior to February 3, 2025, which the hospital agreed to. The Administrator stated (R1) was very tired and groggy upon returning to the facility. Hospital discharge papers, dated 4/20/25, note (R1) was admitted with a diagnosis of Agitation or violent behavior, discharged with a Diagnosis of Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance and to follow up with their primary care physician in 3-5 days. The discharge paperwork also notes (R1) is to begin taking (5) new prescribed medications: Aripiprazole 5 mg; Mirtazapine 15 mg; Prazosin 1 mg; Trazodone 100 mg and Valproic Acid 250 mg. The Administrator stated (R1) returned from the hospital on 4/21/25, with (4) of the medications and the medication, Valproic Acid 250 mg was picked up later that day. The Administrator stated that (R1) was "tired and not able to chew very well"and that (R1) went to sleep as usual on 4/21/25 (at 7:30 pm), did not wake up during the night but had a small amount blood in his underwear, which was normal, at times. The Administrator stated (R1) was previously sent to the Emergency Room for spotting and the facility was advised to hold off on administering Xarelto for (3) days and then resume it. LPA observed this documentation. The Administrator stated in February 2025, Kaiser "decreased but then increased the amount of Depakote" and (R1) also "refused to take this medication, which was a mood stabilizer, now and then, and his situation became worse and worse” until Sunday, April 22, 2025. Documentation shows the medication Depakote and Abilify, also a mood stabilizer, was increased and decreased multiple times starting in February 2025. Based on information obtained, LPA finds this allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED- A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. *cont on 9099C-3.. 9099C-3- Allegation: Staff did not seek timely medical care for resident. The allegation states that on April 22, 2025, resident (R1) was observed to have blood in their underwear and in the shower. The Administrator stated (R1) went to bed at 7:30 pm on Monday night, 4/21/25 and did not wake up during the night but had a small amount blood in his underwear, which was normal, at times. The Administrator stated (R1) was taking medication for prostate and blood thinner. The Administrator stated (R1) was previously sent to the Emergency Room for spotting and the facility was advised to hold off on administering Xarelto for (3) days and then resume it. LPA observed this documentation. Medication records note (R1) was taking Rivaroxaban (Xarelto) 20 mg oral tablet once daily, which is used to treat AFib (Atrial Fibrillation), and this medication and other anti-coagulants can increase the risk of bleeding. The Administrator stated “often times (R1) was bleeding in the teeth area” and she took (R1) to the dentist where they had a plan to treat the gums and used antibiotic rinse”. The Administrator stated (R1) was taken to many medical appointments, including with specialists, which the responsible person confirmed also. Staff (S1) stated that (R1) would occasionally have a small amount of blood, a couple of drops, and (R1) didn’t ever complain about the medical condition, commenting (R1) used to take blood thinner every day. (S1) stated (R1) was good about taking their medications until April 2025 and would give the reason for refusing medications as they “make (R1) feel sick” every time they’re taken. (S1) confirmed Depakote was initially decreased in February 2025 but later increased and (R1) was good about taking the medications. (S1) stated (R1) was not as happy when they started refusing medications on April 7, 2025. Staff (S2) confirmed the same information. LPA and the Administrator phoned the responsible person on 6/17/25, who expressed she was very happy with the care (R1) received at the facility and confirmed the facility would regularly be in contact with her regarding any medical or medication issues, which she would promptly communicate with (R1's) physician. The responsible person confirmed that (R1) had visited the dentist and there was a treatment plan for the bleeding gums (R1) would experience; however, (R1) would cancel the appointments. The responsible person felt that once (R1's) mental heath was treated, they could then go to the dentist. Based on information obtained, LPA finds this allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED- A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview. Copy of report left at facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250505092228
20241 state visit · 1 document
Oct 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual. LPA met with Mariana "Mimi" Musca, caregiver, and stated reason for the inspection. Mariana contacted the Administrator, Adina, by phone, who arrived at approximately 10:30 am. The facility is licensed for (6) non-ambulatory residents and has a hospice waiver for (3). LPA was advised (2) residents are currently under hospice care. LPA observed all (6) residents to be present the facility. LPA and Administrator toured the interior and exterior of the facility including the common areas, (6) resident bedrooms with private bath, (2) full bathrooms, kitchen, (3) staff rooms and garage/locked laundry area. LPA observed the facility to be clean, in good repair and odor-free. The bathrooms have the necessary grab bars, non-skid flooring, paper towels and hand-washing posters. There is sufficient 2+day perishable and 7+day non-perishable supply of food. Sharps and toxins are locked. Hot water temperature measured 113*F in a resident bathroom. Fire extinguisher was last serviced 8/2/24, and the smoke/monoxide alarms are working. Fire doors are kept open with approved device and close automatically when the alarms are activated. Fireplace is used as storage only. There is a locked medication box in the refrigerator, and medications are locked in a separate cabinet. LPA observed the inside temperature to be 79*F. There is a First Aid kit on site as well as sufficient paper/incontinent products, including PPE. All required postings are posted.There is a covered patio table outside and (1) unlocked exit. There are no pools or bodies of water. (2) resident files were reviewed and were found to contain current/complete documentation. Meds were reviewed for (1) resident and orders matched meds being administered. LPA reviewed all staff files and observed current First Aid/CPR certification and documentation of completed annual training. LPA requested an updated copy of LIC500, LIC308 and current liability insurance today by 10/16/24. There are no deficiencies issued during today's inspection. Exit interview with Administrator. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 9, 2024
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 4, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual. LPA met with Mariana "Mimi" Musca, caregiver, and stated reason for the inspection. Mariana contacted the Administrator, Adina, by phone, who arrived at approximately 2:00 pm. LPA was advised that (2) of (6) residents were out of the community; (1) returned during the inspection. (1) resident is currently under hospice care. The facility is licensed for (6) non-ambulatory residents and has a hospice waiver for (3). LPA and Administrator toured the interior and exterior of the facility including the common areas, (6) resident bedrooms with private bath, (2) full bathrooms, kitchen, staff rooms and garage/locked laundry area. LPA observed the facility to be clean, in good repair and odor-free. LPA observed the bathrooms to have the necessary grab bars, non-skid flooring, paper towels and hand-washing posters. LPA observed sufficient 2+day perishable and 7+day non-perishable supply of food, and locked sharps, toxins and medications in the kitchen. There are locked medications in the refrigerator. LPA observed the inside temperature to be 79*F. Fire extinguisher was last serviced 8/21/23. Hot water temperature measured 110*F in the kitchen. First Aid kit on site as well as sufficient paper products, including PPE. All required postings are posted. LPA reviewed the Infection Control Plan (LIC9282) and additional pages, that were last updated on 5/23/23 and found it to be very comprehensive. LPA observed (1) unlocked gate from the inside back patio with covered patio seating. There are no pools or bodies of water. LPA observed copy of RCFE Administrator certificate # 6004705740- exp 11/2/23- renewal documentation to be submitted this month. LPA reviewed (3) resident files and found them to contain current/complete documentation. Meds were reviewed for (1) resident and orders matched meds being administered. Documentation is current also. LPA reviewed all staff files - all staff have current First Aid/CPR certification and have completed recent annual training for (40) hours. LPA requested an updated copy of LIC500, LIC308 and current liability insurance today by 10/11/23. There are no deficiencies issued during today's inspection. Exit interview with Administrator. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Sacramento County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Sacramento County