Jazba Care Tuolumne is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342701069, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 21 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated November 13, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

5 homes in view

Jazba Care Tuolumne

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342701069, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
9031 Tuolumne Drive · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(562) 506-8473
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (6) NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (6).State service designations935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 27 times and filed 21 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated November 13, 2025.

Most recent state visit
November 13, 2025
Occupancy at the July 15, 2025 visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 7 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 7, 2022 to July 15, 2025. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 7 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 13 of 21 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20255 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee is operating beyond the scope of license

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Sangeetha Vipulananda and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of observation, interviews, and record review. LPA Moleski reviewed a resident's file (R1). LPA Moleski observed that they had an admission agreement for another facility, but not this facility. LPA Moleski reviewed an incident reporting an unwitnessed fall suffered by R1. According to the incident report, R1 was admitted to this facility on 7/5/25 and was sent to the hospital on 7/10/25. Vipulananda said that R1 did not return to this facility after hospitalization. LPA Moleski reviewed the files of six current residents (R2-R7). [continued on 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250714090127
May 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 7 documents
Oct 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not sufficiently trained

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Shane Stumpf and explained the purpose of this visit. This investigation consisted of record review. LPA Moleski reviewed personnel records for six staff members (S1-S6). LPA Moleski observed that all six of these staff members had training records documenting 20 hours of initial training. However, none of these six staff members had documentation of completing the required 40 hours of initial training within their first four weeks of employment, per HSC Section 1569.625(b)(1). 22 CCR Section 87412(c) states that “Licensees shall maintain in the personnel records verification of required staff training and orientation.” [continued on 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 12, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240321114138
Jun 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not ensure disaster drills are being conducted

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Shane Stumpf and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews and record review. According to Stumpf, emergency disaster drills have been conducted during staff meetings, which were not mandatory for all staff to attend. The drills were not conducted during each consecutive shift, but staff members of all shifts were invited to attend. LPA Moleski reviewed staff meeting agendas from February 2022 to present. For the year of 2022, LPA Moleski observed four staff meeting agendas from February, May, July, and November. [continued on 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 12, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240419113158
May 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff members worked at facility without criminal record association Staff files are incomplete

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Shane Stumpf and explained the purpose of the visit. When LPA Moleski arrived at the facility, one staff member was present (S1). In an interview, S1 said that S1 had been working at the facility since November or December 2023. LPA Moleski reviewed Guardian records and observed that S1 was associated to the facility as of 3/26/24, one day after LPA Moleski opened a separate complaint investigation regarding criminal record clearances at another facility owned and/or operated by Stumpf. S1 said S1 had been working six days a week at the facility since starting. S1 said S1 had been working with S2 for about a month. [continued on 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 29, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240321114138
20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 7, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 0
Type B citations5typical 0
Substantiated complaints7typical 0
Total complaints6typical 0
State visits on file27typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20255512024573202311020226712021330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (562) 506-8473

Is Jazba Care Tuolumne licensed?

Yes — Jazba Care Tuolumne is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342701069, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 21 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated November 13, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Jazba Care Tuolumne care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Jazba Care Tuolumne with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (6) NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (6).

How much does Jazba Care Tuolumne cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Jazba Care Tuolumne's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Jazba Care Tuolumne accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Jazba Care Tuolumne is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on July 15, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Jazba Care Tuolumne?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 27 state visits and 21 dated documents since 2021 for Jazba Care Tuolumne; 7 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated July 15, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

7 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee is operating beyond the scope of license
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Sangeetha Vipulananda and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of observation, interviews, and record review. LPA Moleski reviewed a resident's file (R1). LPA Moleski observed that they had an admission agreement for another facility, but not this facility. LPA Moleski reviewed an incident reporting an unwitnessed fall suffered by R1. According to the incident report, R1 was admitted to this facility on 7/5/25 and was sent to the hospital on 7/10/25. Vipulananda said that R1 did not return to this facility after hospitalization. LPA Moleski reviewed the files of six current residents (R2-R7). [continued on 9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, July 15, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250714090127

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not sufficiently trained
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Shane Stumpf and explained the purpose of this visit. This investigation consisted of record review. LPA Moleski reviewed personnel records for six staff members (S1-S6). LPA Moleski observed that all six of these staff members had training records documenting 20 hours of initial training. However, none of these six staff members had documentation of completing the required 40 hours of initial training within their first four weeks of employment, per HSC Section 1569.625(b)(1). 22 CCR Section 87412(c) states that “Licensees shall maintain in the personnel records verification of required staff training and orientation.” [continued on 9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 12, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240321114138
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not ensure disaster drills are being conducted
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to deliver findings on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Shane Stumpf and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews and record review. According to Stumpf, emergency disaster drills have been conducted during staff meetings, which were not mandatory for all staff to attend. The drills were not conducted during each consecutive shift, but staff members of all shifts were invited to attend. LPA Moleski reviewed staff meeting agendas from February 2022 to present. For the year of 2022, LPA Moleski observed four staff meeting agendas from February, May, July, and November. [continued on 9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 12, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240419113158
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff members worked at facility without criminal record association Staff files are incomplete
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to open this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Shane Stumpf and explained the purpose of the visit. When LPA Moleski arrived at the facility, one staff member was present (S1). In an interview, S1 said that S1 had been working at the facility since November or December 2023. LPA Moleski reviewed Guardian records and observed that S1 was associated to the facility as of 3/26/24, one day after LPA Moleski opened a separate complaint investigation regarding criminal record clearances at another facility owned and/or operated by Stumpf. S1 said S1 had been working six days a week at the facility since starting. S1 said S1 had been working with S2 for about a month. [continued on 9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 29, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240321114138

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedMedication: Staff is not following physician's orders
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Avelina Martinez arrived at the facility unannounced on 10/19/2022 at 8:50 am to deliver complaint findings, LPA met with Shane Stumpf and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA Martinez conducted interviews and reviewed facility records. LPA Martinez reviewed resident 1 (R1) medication orders, medication list, and Medication Administration Record (MAR), and Centrally Stored Medication And Destruction Record (CSMDR). The facility CSMDR record logged Amlodipine 5MG was filled January 27, 2022 and no start date. LPA Martinez reviewed R1's April 2022 Medication list, which stated Amlodipine 5MG. LPA Martinez reviewed R1's May MAR, which stated Amlodipine 2.5 MG and the first part of the May Mar was not completed. Furthermore, there was no discontinuance order for the 5MG and no start order for the 2.5 MG in May of 2022. However, a September 9, 2022 medical doctor order states Amlodipine dosage was changed to 2.5CDSS inspection report, October 19, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220912150514
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedOther: Facility is not providing authorized representatives with requested documents regarding mother's care.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Jazba Care LLC on 6/2/22 at 1:15pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA met with Licensee and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews conducted and statements obtained during the investigation process, the allegations cannot be corroborated because the facility and department has received no documentation from individuals who have been designated as having power of attorney (POA) had not provided to the facility any documentation from a physician that resident has been incapacitated an can no longer make their own medical decisions. Therefore, the resident's POA and POA for medical decision making has not been triggered at the time of writing this report. The department has determined that the resident has retained the right to their own decision making and the facility cannot share the information without the approval of theCDSS inspection report, June 2, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220510154943
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedReporting Requirements: 1) Administrator did not report COVID outbreak. Personal Rights: 1) Facility not allowing visitors
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to Jazba Care LLC (RCFE) on 4/7/22 at 1:15pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA met with Administrator and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, the allegations cannot be substantiated because no resident or family member interviewed provided statements that they could not visit the facility. LPA Gould conducted interviews with four of the five residents family members and all family interviewed had positive impressions of the facility and staff. No family member interviewed stated they were told not to visit the facility and no family member identified a resident or family member had tested positive at the facility. LPA Gould conducted interviews with two of the five residents and all confirmed they have had visitors and were not aware of any residents in the facility teCDSS inspection report, April 7, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220225131405

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 27 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
5
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
7
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
27
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Jazba Care Tuolumne?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Jazba Care Llc, who operates 3 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(562) 506-8473
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Jazba Care Tuolumne? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.