Muirfield A Home For The Elderly is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342700458, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 10 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated November 21, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

Muirfield A Home For The Elderly

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342700458, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
7541 Muirfield Way · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 424-4553
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 4 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4 RESIDENTS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 13 times and filed 10 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated November 21, 2025.

Most recent state visit
November 21, 2025
Occupancy at the September 24, 2025 visit
5 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 23, 2024 to September 24, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 10 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20254 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident. Staff did not provide medical attention to resident in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Muirfield A Home for the Elderly RCFE on 9/24/25 at 1:00pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with administrator, Marilyn Carpio and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. LPA Gould conducted interviews with two resident and one former resident. All residents interviewed denied being hit or abused by any staff member. Additionally, LPA could obtain no corroborating evidence that R1 did not receive medical attention in a timely manner. No staff member interviewed identified any delay in care or treatment for R1. LPA had received incident report for reported hospital visit to address health concerns for R1. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250821091850
Sep 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff engaged in inappropriate interactions with residents in care

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Muirefield A Home For the Elderly RCFE on 9/24/25 at 1:00pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with staff, Marilyn Carpio and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. LPA Gould conducted several collateral inspections at current and previous placements for R1. No staff member has observed an individual visiting R1 or observed R1 in a romantic relationship with a caregiver from the facility at their current or former placement. Staff members interviewed denied the allegations. LPA conducted interview with R1's authorized representative and no other corroborating information was obtained. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250903154616
Aug 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not serve residents food of good quality

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Muirfield home for the elderly at 9:30am to conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with staff, Marilyn Carpio and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the LPA observations during the investigation process, the allegations are substantiated. LPA observed several expired food items in the fridge and multiple items stored without proper dating. LPA observed spaghetti with meat sauce that per staff member was prepared the prior evening to be served for lunch. LPA observed the pan was at room temperature and did not meet food storage requirements. LPA observed staff discard the food at LPAs request. LPA explained the storing of food could promote bacterial growth and posed a danger if consumed by residents. The Department has determined, based on the preponderance of the evidence obtained during this investigation, that the allegation ofthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250801124152
Aug 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff serving residents expired food.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Muirfield home for the elderly at 9:30am to conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with staff, Marilyn Carpio and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the LPA observations during the investigation process, the allegations are substantiated. LPA observed several expired food items in the fridge and multiple items stored without proper dating. LPA observed spaghetti with meat sauce that per staff member was prepared the prior evening to be served for lunch. LPA observed the pan was at room temperature and did not meet food storage requirements. LPA observed staff discard the food at LPAs request. LPA explained the storing of food could promote bacterial growth and posed a danger if consumed by residents. The Department has determined, based on the preponderance of the evidence obtained during this investigation, that the allegation ofthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250821091850
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Personal Rights: Staff hit resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced complaint inspection at Muirfield A Home for the Elderly on 2/23/24 at 1:30pm to inform the licensee of complaint allegation mentioned above. During this investigation LPA Gould interviewed S1, R1, R2 and R3 (See confidential name list LIC-811 dated 2/23/24). Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, the allegations cannot be substantiated because All residents interviewed denied the allegations including the identified alleged victim. All statements obtained indicate that staff were attempting to wake resident who was making a disturbance in their sleep. Resident states she now understand staff were attempting to wake her and is what they also informed the police when they responded to the home. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240221133222
20231 state visit · 1 document
Nov 16, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file13typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20254622024220202311020221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

≈ $5,000–$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 424-4553

Is Muirfield A Home For The Elderly licensed?

Yes — Muirfield A Home For The Elderly is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342700458, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 10 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated November 21, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Muirfield A Home For The Elderly care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Muirfield A Home For The Elderly with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY RESIDENTS. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 4 RESIDENTS.

How much does Muirfield A Home For The Elderly cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Muirfield A Home For The Elderly's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Muirfield A Home For The Elderly accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Muirfield A Home For The Elderly is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 6 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on September 24, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Muirfield A Home For The Elderly?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 13 state visits and 10 dated documents since 2021 for Muirfield A Home For The Elderly; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 24, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hit resident. Staff did not provide medical attention to resident in a timely manner.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Muirfield A Home for the Elderly RCFE on 9/24/25 at 1:00pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegations and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with administrator, Marilyn Carpio and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. LPA Gould conducted interviews with two resident and one former resident. All residents interviewed denied being hit or abused by any staff member. Additionally, LPA could obtain no corroborating evidence that R1 did not receive medical attention in a timely manner. No staff member interviewed identified any delay in care or treatment for R1. LPA had received incident report for reported hospital visit to address health concerns for R1. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, September 24, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250821091850
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff engaged in inappropriate interactions with residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Muirefield A Home For the Elderly RCFE on 9/24/25 at 1:00pm to conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with staff, Marilyn Carpio and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the interviews conducted during the investigation process and statements obtained during the investigation process, LPA Gould was unable to corroborate the allegations. LPA Gould conducted several collateral inspections at current and previous placements for R1. No staff member has observed an individual visiting R1 or observed R1 in a romantic relationship with a caregiver from the facility at their current or former placement. Staff members interviewed denied the allegations. LPA conducted interview with R1's authorized representative and no other corroborating information was obtained. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, September 24, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250903154616
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not serve residents food of good quality
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Muirfield home for the elderly at 9:30am to conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with staff, Marilyn Carpio and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the LPA observations during the investigation process, the allegations are substantiated. LPA observed several expired food items in the fridge and multiple items stored without proper dating. LPA observed spaghetti with meat sauce that per staff member was prepared the prior evening to be served for lunch. LPA observed the pan was at room temperature and did not meet food storage requirements. LPA observed staff discard the food at LPAs request. LPA explained the storing of food could promote bacterial growth and posed a danger if consumed by residents. The Department has determined, based on the preponderance of the evidence obtained during this investigation, that the allegation of— CDSS inspection report, August 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250801124152
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff serving residents expired food.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Kevin Gould made an unannounced inspection to the Muirfield home for the elderly at 9:30am to conclude the investigation of the above allegation and to deliver the findings. LPA Gould met with staff, Marilyn Carpio and together discussed the investigation details. Based on the LPA observations during the investigation process, the allegations are substantiated. LPA observed several expired food items in the fridge and multiple items stored without proper dating. LPA observed spaghetti with meat sauce that per staff member was prepared the prior evening to be served for lunch. LPA observed the pan was at room temperature and did not meet food storage requirements. LPA observed staff discard the food at LPAs request. LPA explained the storing of food could promote bacterial growth and posed a danger if consumed by residents. The Department has determined, based on the preponderance of the evidence obtained during this investigation, that the allegation of— CDSS inspection report, August 27, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250821091850

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPersonal Rights: Staff hit resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Gould conducted an unannounced complaint inspection at Muirfield A Home for the Elderly on 2/23/24 at 1:30pm to inform the licensee of complaint allegation mentioned above. During this investigation LPA Gould interviewed S1, R1, R2 and R3 (See confidential name list LIC-811 dated 2/23/24). Based on the interviews and statements obtained during the investigation process, the allegations cannot be substantiated because All residents interviewed denied the allegations including the identified alleged victim. All statements obtained indicate that staff were attempting to wake resident who was making a disturbance in their sleep. Resident states she now understand staff were attempting to wake her and is what they also informed the police when they responded to the home. Report Continued on LIC 9099-C Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, February 23, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240221133222

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 13 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
13
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 424-4553
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Muirfield A Home For The Elderly? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.