Small home · Licensed for 6 · Fair Oaks
Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa
5929 Spring Glen Dr, Fair Oaks, CA 95628Licensed since 2018
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · HospiceState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Hospiceup to 3 residents
Not on file: dementia and bedridden approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX (6) NON-AMBULATORY ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR THREE (3)
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,050a month to start
Likely $3,300–$5,000
From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,050likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,050likely $3,300–$5,000
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,300–$5,200
- $4,050
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,900–$8,450
- $6,550
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes12 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $9,000
12 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$7,500.
- All Seasons HialeahFair Oaks · 0.6 mi · Small home$9,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Splendor Oaks Senior Living #3Fair Oaks · 0.8 mi · Mid-size home$5,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Love You MomOrangevale · 1.2 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Comfort & CareOrangevale · 1.3 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Glen Creek Villa II-Res. Care Fac. for the ElderlyOrangevale · 1.5 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Ettys' CareOrangevale · 1.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Crown JewelOrangevale · 2.6 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Magnolia Elderly Care HomeFair Oaks · 2.8 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- The Elderly Inn IIICitrus Heights · 2.8 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Best Life Home CareCitrus Heights · 2.9 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Glorious Homes #1Citrus Heights · 3.0 mi · Small home$5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Aaa CareCitrus Heights · 3.0 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
5929 Spring Glen Dr, Fair Oaks, CA 95628Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Mercy San Juan Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #342700350 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 11 of 17 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Unsubstantiated” and 1 “Unfounded”.
20261 state visit · 2 documents
Jun 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility's outdoor perimeter fencing is in disrepair, posing a safety risk to residents in care
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Doris Espinoza, to open a complaint investigation into the allegation listed above. During visit, LPA toured the premises. LPA observed a portion of the fence surrounding the property to be in disrepair. LPA observed portion of the fence in disrepair to be inaccessible to residents in care and away from any pathways or emergency exits. Based on LPA's observations, it is determined that disrepair of the fence does not pose a safety risk to the residents in care. LPA issued a deficiency regarding repair of the care home, including backyard fence, in a separate inspection conducted on June 17, 2026. Based on observations, the above allegation is found to be UNFOUNDED. A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of the report was provided. Signatures on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260609142455
Jun 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the care home unannounced on June 17, 2026 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are six (6) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms for resident use. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. Hot water temperature was observed to be 117 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on site. LPA observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home and observed emergency exits to be unobstructed. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked two (2) residents' medications, six (6) resident files, and three (3) staff files. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA requested a copy. As a result of today's inspection, deficiencies are being cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, Section 87465 due to medications being accessible to residents in staff bedroom, and Section 87303 due to cleanliness and repair of the care home, including backyard fence in disrepair, debris in backyard, interior floors in disrepair, dishes in kitchen sink, and dish washer in disrepair. Deficiencies are listed on 809-D pages. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signatures on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2026
20256 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Health ChecksReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Michael Hood and Marisa Chiarelli arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Doris Espinoza, to conduct a case management health and safety check. LPAs conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are six (6) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms for resident use. LPAs observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. LPAs checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPAs observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPAs observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPAs checked two (2) residents' medications and observed medication to be locked and inaccessible to the residents in care. LPAs reviewed six (6) resident records and three (3) staff records. LPAs observed that all records were complete and staff training was complete. LPAs observed staff on the premises to have a criminal background clearance on file. As a result of today's inspection, no deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 18, 2025
Oct 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Health ChecksReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Doris Espinoza, to conduct a case management health and safety check. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are five (5) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms for resident use. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPA observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked two (2) residents' medications and observed medication to be locked and inaccessible to the residents in care. LPA reviewed six (6) resident records and three (3) staff records. LPA observed that all records were complete and staff training was complete. LPA observed staff on the premises to have a criminal background clearance on file. As a result of today's inspection, no deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2025
Aug 27, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care due to neglect or lack of care and supervision
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Doris Espinoza, to deliver findings into the complaint allegation listed above. During the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: Allegation: Resident sustained unexplained injuries while in care due to neglect or lack of care and supervision ** Report continued on 9099-C ** Unsubstantiated On May 18. 2025, resident (R1) was admitted to the hospital due to complaints of stomach and back pain. While being evaluated by medical staff, it was discovered R1 had “aged” fractures, including an age indeterminate fracture deformity of the humeral neck. Per ER doctor, the injuries could have been caused by a “subacute” (slower onset illness). Doctor had no clear evidence to support R1 was being mistreated, however, doctor found it “inconsistent” that no falls were reported despite R1 sustaining “multiple subacute to chronic compression fractures.” The Department conducted interviews with several staff, who all denied ever witnessing R1 sustaining a fall or being involved in any sort of incident which could have caused injury. Staff reported R1 receives one-on-one (1:1) care and staff are with R1 at all times. R1 tends to walk without the assistance of their walker, so staff will escort R1 around the house. The Department conducted interviews with several residents, including R1 who still lives in the facility. Most residents have dementia, but overall there were no complaints from the residents regarding the staff and care being provided at the facility. The Department interviewed relevant party who oversees R1’s care since August of 2023. Relevant party had no concerns of abuse at the facility. Relevant party was only aware of one (1) fall, which occurred on August 15, 2024 for which R1 received medical attention. Relevant party noted R1 used to have an authorized representative who was neglecting and financially abusing R1 over a few year period. Relevant party believed “aged fractures” could have occurred during the time period in which authorized representative was overseeing R1’s care. During visit conducted on May 22, 2025, LPA Michael Hood and Local Long Term Care Ombudsman met with R1 regarding complaint. R1 stated that they were “pretty fine” and denied having hurt their neck. R1 stated that they haven’t fallen but came close to falling. Based on interviews conducted and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standards have not been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 27, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250520090643
Jun 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Doris Espinoza, regarding information obtained during inspection conducted on May 22, 2025. During visit, LPA obtained a copy of the facility's surety bond for the Department's record to allow the facility to handle resident cash. Despite surety bond, facility will not handle resident cash and will bill families after additional services provided. LPA also obtained a permit from the county regarding adding an additional bedroom to the care home. Fire inspection has already been requested and facility is in the process of obtaining fire clearance for the room. As a result of today's visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2025
May 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility unannounced on 5/22/25 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are five (5) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms for resident use. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. Hot water temperature was observed to be 115 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPA observed knives, cleaning products, and other toxins to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked two (2) residents' medications and found medication to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed five (5) resident files and two (2) staff files. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA requested a copy. As a result of this visit, no deficiencies were cited per California Code of Regulations, Title 22. Exit interview conducted and copy of report given at the conclusion of this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 22, 2025
Apr 2, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Health ChecksReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Health Checks
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Doris Espinoza, to conduct a case management health and safety check. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are five (5) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms for resident use. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPA observed knives, cleaning products, and other toxins to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed the backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked two (2) residents' medications and observed medication to be locked and inaccessible to the residents in care. LPA reviewed six (6) resident records and two (2) staff records. LPA observed that all records were complete and staff training was complete. LPA observed staff on the premises to have a criminal background clearance on file. As a result of today's inspection, no deficiencies are being cited. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2025
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file
Type of visit: Office
An informal conference was conducted at 9:00 AM on September 30, 2024, with Sacramento North Regional Office via Microsoft Teams. The purpose of this informal conference meeting is to address citations issued during inspections conducted on 6/19/2024 and 9/10/2024. The Administrator was told that this Informal conference is a part of the Administrative Action process and that further noncompliance may result in an elevation to a formal noncompliance conference, which could lead to a referral to the Department's legal division for possible revocation of license. The following Licensing staff were present: Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Michael Hood and Cassie Mikkelson, and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Anthony Perez The following facility representatives were present: Administrator Doris Espinoza, and Licensee Leilani Aragon The following topics were covered during today's meeting: · An overview regarding 6 Type A citations, 9 Type B citations, and 4 civil penalties · Recommendations for pending plan of corrections · Recommended hours for Administrator's presence at the facility. Administrator submitted updated documents prior to meeting showing new hours for Administrator to be at facility. Facility was notified that the Department may increase monitoring at the facility. Technical support was offered to facility representative during meeting. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report will be provided to the facility via email. A copy must be signed and returned to the Department.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 30, 2024
Sep 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportPOCDeficiency pages: Type B, Type A
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Michael Hood and Cassie Mikkelson arrived at the facility and met with Administrator, Melissa Szeto, to follow-up on plan of corrections made to the facility during an inspection conducted on 6/19/2024. During today's visit, LPAs conducted a tour of the care home. LPAs observed backyard and perimeter of the care home to be free of clutter and debris. LPAs inspected medication and conducted file reviews for six (6) residents and two (2) staff. LPAs observed residents to have property and valuable records on file. LPAs observed staff at the care home to have CPR and first aid training. LPAs observed staff to have health screenings on file. LPAs observed knives and disinfectants unlocked and accessible to the residents in care in the kitchen area. LPAs observed medications administered not documented with start dates. LPAs observed new staff to have an insufficient amount of initial training documented. LPAs observed an insufficient amount of nonperishable food supply on cite. As a result of today's inspection, deficiencies are being cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. Civil penalties were assessed as a result of today's visit. Deficiencies are listed on 809-D pages. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signature on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.625(b)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 25, 2024
(1) The department shall adopt regulations to require staff members of residential care facilities for the elderly who assist residents with personal activities of daily living to receive appropriate training. This training shall consist of 40 hours of training. A staff member shall complete 20 hours, including six hours specific to dementia care, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.626 and four hours specific to postural supports, restricted health conditions, and hospice care, as required by subdivision (a) of Section 1569.696, before working independently with residents. The remaining 20 hours shall include six hours specific to dementia care and shall be completed within the first four weeks of employment. The training coursework may utilize various methods of instruction, including, but not limited to, lectures, instructional videos, and interactive online courses. The additional 16 hours shall be hands-on training. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPAs' observations and records reviewed, facility did not ensure that staff received initial training and documentation for initial training was maintained at the facility, which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024
Plan of correction: Facility will ensure to complete initial training for all newly hired staff and maintain documentation for training at the facility at all times. Facility will complete initial training for any staff missing initial training and submit documentation for initial training to LPA by POC due date of 9/25/2024. A civil penalty in the amount of $250 was assessed for repeat violation.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87555(b)(26) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 25, 2024
87555 General Food Service Requirements (b) The following food service requirements shall apply: (26) Supplies of nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days shall be maintained on the premises. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPAs' observations, facility did not ensure to have a seven (7) day nonperishable food supply on cite, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024
Plan of correction: Facility will ensure to have a two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day nonperishable food supply on cite. Licensee will complete a statement of understanding regarding regulation 87555 and submit statement to LPA by POC due date of 9/25/2024.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87309(a) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 11, 2024
(a) Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons, firearms and other items which could pose a danger if readily available to clients shall be stored where inaccessible to clients. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPAs' observations, the facility did not ensure that storages for disinfectants, cleaning solutions, and knives were locked and inaccessible to the residents at all times, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024
Plan of correction: Facility will conduct an in-service training for staff regarding regulation 87309. Facility will submit date of training and materials to LPA by POC due date of 9/11/2024. A civil penalty in the amount of $250 was assessed for repeat violation.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 11, 2024
(4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on LPAs' observations and records reviewed, facility did not ensure to document medications on Centrally Stored Medication Forms for all residents with some medications having no identifiable start date, which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 10, 2024
Plan of correction: Facility will complete a weekly medication audit and document audit for the next month. Facility will submit documentation for weekly audit to LPA each week. A civil penalty in the amount of $250 was assessed for repeat violation.
Jun 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility unannounced on 6/19/24 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are five (5) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms for resident use. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. Hot water temperature was observed to be 116 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. LPA walked the perimeter of the care home and checked medication storage. LPA reviewed six (6) resident files and two (2) staff files. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA requested a copy. As a result of today's inspection, deficiencies are being cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8. Deficiencies are listed on 809-D pages. An immediate civil penalty per Health and Safety Code § 1548 in the amount of $500 for the date of 6/19/2024 is assessed for a violation that the department determines was a fire clearance violation. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signatures on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2024
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 6 documents
20231 state visit · 1 document
Jul 20, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Hood arrived at the facility unannounced on 7/20/23 to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA conducted an inspection of the care home to ensure compliance with Title 22 regulations. There are five (5) bedrooms and two (2) bathrooms for resident use. LPA observed bedrooms to be properly furnished, with appropriate bedding and lighting. The bathrooms were in sanitary condition and properly maintained. Hot water temperature was observed to be 118.4 degrees F. LPA checked the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. Care home has required two (2) day perishable and seven (7) day non-perishable food supply on cite. LPA observed knives, cleaning products, and other toxins to be locked away and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors to be operational in the care home. First aid kit is maintained and ready for emergency use. LPA checked medication storage and found medication to be locked away and inaccessible to the residents. LPA reviewed three (3) resident files and two (2) staff files. Facility has a current copy of certificate of liability insurance and LPA obtained a copy. As a result of today's inspection, a deficiency is being cited pursuant to California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Section 87202(a)(2) due to the retention of a bedridden resident without fire clearance approval. Deficiency is listed on 809-D. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator. A copy of this report and appeal rights were provided. Signatures on these forms acknowledges receipt of these documents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 20, 2023
20224 state visits · 5 documents
Jul 22, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct a required annual. LPA met with Teka Thomas, and Mureen Williams, caregivers, and explained purpose of inspection.. Glenn Bilog, Administrator, arrived to the facility at approximately 3:15 pm. LPA observed (4) residents to be in their rooms at the start of the inspection. LPA was informed that (1) resident has been out of the facility for (2) weeks and will be returning next week. The facility is licensed for (6) non-ambulatory residents and has a hospice waiver for (3) residents. Currently, there are no residents on hospice. Prior to initiating today's inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols and confirmed the facility does not currently have any positive Covid-19 diagnoses. LPA was screened per Covid-19 precautionary measures upon entering the facility.and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95 mask. LPA and caregiver toured the interior and exterior of the facility including the common areas, resident bedrooms, resident bathrooms (3), kitchen,medication room, staff room and laundry. LPA observed the facility to be clean, in good repair and to have sufficient furniture and lighting.. LPA observed the bathrooms to have the necessary grab bars, non-skid flooring, paper towels- Admin to ensure hand-washing posters are placed near every sink. LPA observed sufficient 2+day perishable and 7+day non-perishable supply of food, locked sharps in the kitchen and locked toxins in the laundry room. LPA observed the inside temperature to be 80*F. Fire extinguisher was last serviced 7/27/2021- Administrator to complete annual servicing by 7/27/2022. Discussed vaccination status of residents/staff, eligibility for second boosters and visitation protocols. All staff are cleared/associated. Administrator certificate #6047388740- current through 2/16/2024. All required postings and various Covid posters are posted. LPA requested an updated copy of LIC500, LIC308, copy of the current liability insurance and the facility's Infection Control Plan by provided to the Department by 7/30/2022. Exit interview. Copy of report provided to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 22, 2022
Jun 1, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to issue an additional deficiency discovered during a recent complaint investigation. LPA met with Marlene Duncan, caregiver, who contacted the Administrator, Lani, by phone. LPA spoke to Administrator and explained purpose of inspection. LPA also observed caregiver, Fredricka Quarrie to be present. Prior to initiating today's inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols and completed a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. Additionally, LPA was screened per Covid-19 precautionary measures upon entering the community. LPA ensured she applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: KN95 mask. LPA observed (5) residents to be napping/awake in their rooms at the start of the inspection. (1) resident was sent to the ER this morning and will be returning today. During the investigation of complaint 25-AS-20220128094750, it was discovered that resident records were not maintained for resident (R1) following resident's stay at the facility from 1/22/22 - 1/24/22. Administrator indicated that resident's responsible person requested that resident's records be shredded and disposed of due to containing personal information. LPA discussed with Administrator today the requirement to maintain resident records of reach resident for a minimum of (3) years, even if a resident or their representative requests they be shredded. LPA and Administrator discussed possibly redacting personal information such a social security number on the copies maintained at the facility. The additional deficiencies issued on 5/26/2022 were cleared during today's inspection as documentation of training was received by the Department on 5/27/22. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following (1) deficiency is being cited on the 809D page. Exit interview. Copy of report and appeal rights to be e-mailed to the Administrator following today's inspection.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 1, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(e) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 15, 2022
87506 Resident Records (e) Original records or photographic reproductions shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) years following termination of service to the resident.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview conducted with Administrator, records for resident (R1) were not maintained at the facility following resident moving out on 1/24/22, which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 1, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator agrees to read Regulation 87506 and provide the Department with a signed statement that it is understood. Statement to be faxed to the Department by 6/15/22.
May 26, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident not administered medication as prescribed. Facility did not assess resident prior to admission.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 1/28/2022. LPA met with Fredricka Quarrie, Maureen Williams, Marlene Duncan, caregivers, who contacted the Administrator, Lani, by phone. LPA spoke to Administrator and explained reason for visit. Administrator stated she is not able to be at the facility during today's inspection but would request that Co-Administrator, Glenn, stop by and caregivers could assist LPA also. Co-Administrator, Glenn Bilog, arrived at facility around 3:30 pm. Caregivers confirmed there are (6) residents currently, and there are (0) residents on hospice. Prior to initiating today's inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols and completed a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. Additionally, LPA was screened per Covid-19 precautionary measures upon entering the community. LPA ensured she applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95 mask. LPA observed (6) residents to be napping/awake in their rooms at the start of the inspection. The results of the investigation are as follows: cont on 9099C(1).. Substantiated During the investigation, LPA interviewed (2) Administrators and (3) caregivers and a family member and reviewed documentation pertaining to medication administration for (3) current residents. Resident (R1) moved to the facility on 1/22/22 around the afternoon time and moved out on 1/24/22 early in the morning. Allegation: Resident not administered medication as prescribed. Allegation is resident (R1) is required to take melatonin once a day at 10:00pm but instead was being administered two melatonin at noon. Interview with (2) Administrators indicated that resident (R1) refused medications starting on Sunday, 1/24/22 and would only accept from family members. One staff stated "(R1) refused medications- she spit them out- we put them in applesauce and she still spit them out". A second staff stated he was not aware of any medication issues, and a third staff stated "I never gave her medications- I was off work".Administrator confirmed there is no documentation on file as resident's family requested that any documentation be shredded after resident moved out and the placement agency took some documents also. LPA and staff (S1) reviewed medications for (3) residents (R2-R4) on 5/26/2022, including physician's orders, Centrally Stored Medication Record (LIC622) and Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May 2022. It was determined that resident (R2) had not received Docusate on 5/26/22, due to waiting for a refill, but had received it from 5/1/22- 5/25/22. For resident (R3), Klor-Con-8-MEQ and Docusate 200mg were last administered on 5/25/22 in the morning, due to waiting on a refilled supply. Additionally, LPA observed an empty bottle of Atorvastatin-Calcium 40 mg, filled on 8/16/2021, and an opened bottle of Melatonin 10mg, to be stored with R3's current medications; Neither medication was listed on the May 2022 MAR and prescription orders, dated 8/25/2021 show that each medication is scheduled to be taken once daily. For resident (R4), LPA and S1 counted 23 tablets of PRN Alprazolam 0.5 mg, filled on 5/15/22, and determined that 7 tablets were administered since 5/15/22; however, there is no documentation on file as required. New orders were written on 5/24/22 to discontinue Alprazolam and start PRN Haloperidol 2 mg. Administrator confirmed that the medication Alprazolam, was given but not documented. cont on 9099C(2).. Based on information obtained, LPA finds the allegation to be SUBSTANTIATED- A finding that the allegation is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Allegation: Facility did not assess resident prior to admission. Allegation is resident (R1) was not physically assessed prior to residing at the facility and placement agency and Licensee agreed to accept resident to move in. Administrator stated on 2/2/22 that she did not evaluate resident in person, prior to admission, and asked skilled nursing for paperwork, including resident's physician's report. Administrator further stated that she talked to resident's daughter before admitting her. Administrator confirmed there was also no paperwork kept on file after resident moved out. LPA was not able to contact placement agency representative to confirm the pre-appraisal process used. Based on information obtained, LPA finds the allegation to be SUBSTANTIATED- A finding that the allegation is substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. Per California Code of Regulation, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following (2) deficiencies are issued on the 9099D pages. Exit interview. Copy of report and appeal rights provided to Administrator. 9099C(1).. Resident's family member said one Administrator stated there were (2) melatonin in a picture family member texted to Administrators but could not explain why there were (2) "pre-poured" for resident. Family member also stated that when she visited on Sunday, 1/23/22, in the morning, R1 was asleep in the chair in the living room and staff stated "I guess she took her medications". Another staff stated that resident woke him up at 4 am and wouldn't sleep. Based on information obtained, LPA finds the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED- meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Allegation: Staff administered incorrect medications. Allegation is when R1's family member requested to see R1's medication. RP stated staff (S2) brought out a white basket full of medications with R3's name on it and none of the medications belonged to R1. It is unclear how long R1 was being administered R3's medications. LPA interviewed staff (S2) and asked if there was a medication mix-up with R1's medications and another resident's medications. S2 stated "No, there was not a mix-up with the medications"- the "Medications are already in a pocket", ready to administer. S2 showed LPA the small walk-in closet with shelves where resident medications and binders are kept. LPA observed multiple residents' medications, each in a labeled basket. LPA asked how S2 may have grabbed the wrong basket if each basket has a name on it. S2 then spoke quickly, stating that during the video call R1's family member pointed to the white basket and said "that basket" when asked which basket has R1's medications. S2 further stated that R1 took medications once only, from 1/22/22 through 1/24/22, when her family member gave them to her. Resident moved out on 1/24/22. Based on information obtained, LPA finds the allegation to be UNSUBSTANTIATED- meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview. Copy of report provided to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220128094750
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 10, 2022
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care(a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on documentation review, medications were not administered for residents, R2 and R3, per physician's orders, as medication exhausted before a refill was obtained. Additionally, MAR does not document that R3 received Atorvastatin-Calcium 40 mg, or Melatonin 10mg as ordered, which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator agree to conduct medication management training to all staff, including correct documentation on MAR, LIC622, PRN, refill process. Administrator agrees to audit the remaining (3) resident files to ensure there are no discrepancies between doctor orders and medication being administered. Documentation of training- including topics discussed and staff who attended to be faxed to the department by 6/10/22.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87457(c)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 10, 2022
(c) Prior to admission a determination of the prospective resident's suitability for admission shall be completed and shall include an appraisal of his/her individual service needs in comparison with the admission criteria specified in Section 87455, Acceptance and Retention Limitations. (1) The appraisal shall include, at a minimum, an evaluation of the prospective resident's functional capabilities, mental condition and an evaluation of social factors as specified in Sections 87459, Functional Capabilities and 87462 Social Factors.This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview with Administrator, the Licensee did not ensure that resident (R1) was evaluated in person prior to admission on 1/22/22, which posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care. ,the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2022
Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator agrees to read Regulation 87457 and provide a signed statement to the department that it is undestood. Due by 6/10/22.
May 26, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to complete and deliver findings to a complaint investigation received on 1/28/2022. LPA met with Fredricka Quarrie, Maureen Williams, Marlene Duncan, caregivers, who contacted the Administrator, Lani, by phone. LPA met with Glenn Bilog, Co-Administrator, who arrived at the facility around 3:30 pm. Prior to initiating today's inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols and completed a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. Additionally, LPA was screened per Covid-19 precautionary measures upon entering the community. LPA ensured she applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95 mask. LPA observed (6) residents to be napping/awake in their rooms at the start of the inspection. During the course of the investigation, the additional deficiency was observed as follows: During a medication record review for resident (R1) on 5/26/22, it was determined that (7) tablets of a bottle of (30) of PTN Alprazolam 0.5 mg were administered to R1 from 5/15/22 through 5/26/22; however, there is no documentation to show on what days, times, etc as required per the regulation. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following (1) deficiency is being cited on the 809D page. Exit interview. Copy of report and appeal rights provided to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(d)(3) · Plan of correction due date: May 30, 2022
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care(d) If the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for a prescription or nonprescription PRN medication, and is unable to communicate his/her symptoms clearly, facility staff designated by the licensee, shall be permitted to assist the resident with self-administration provided all of the following requirements are met: (3) The date and time the PRN medication was taken, the dosage taken, and the resident's response shall be documented and maintained in the resident's facility record. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review and interviews conducted, the Licensee did not ensure that the facility maintained a record of PRN medications administered for Alpharazolam 0.5mg for resident (R3), which poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 26, 2022
Plan of correction: LIcensee/administrator agree to conduct staff training oni documentation of PRN medication. Documentation to be provided to department bt 6/10/22.
Feb 9, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type A
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sabrina Calzada arrived unannounced to conduct a follow up case management inspection. LPA met with Denise Hall, caregiver (S3) who contacted the Administrator, Leilani, by phone. LPA spoke to Administrator and explained reason for visit. Caregiver confirmed there are (6) residents currently, and there is (1) resident on hospice. Prior to initiating today's inspection, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols and completed a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. Additionally, LPA was screened per Covid-19 precautionary measures upon entering the community. LPA ensured she applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N95 mask. LPA observed (6) residents to be napping/awake in their rooms. LPA conducted an inspection on 2/2/2022 at the facility, and it was learned following the inspection that staff (S1 and S2), who were present during the inspection, did not have fingerprint clearance prior to starting their employment at the facility. LPA followed up by phone with the Administrator on 2/7/2022 to advise of the requirement that staff be fingerprint cleared before being allowed to work at the facility. Administrator advised that S1 would be having fingerprints taken that day, on 2/7/2022. Administrator provided LPA with electronic documentation during today's inspection that S1 is currently cleared and associated to the facility effective yesterday, 2/8/22. Administrator stated that S2 chose not to have fingerprints taken and no longer works for the facility. Administrator confirmed that both S1 and S2 worked at the facility starting on/around January 2022. Interview conducted with S2 on 2/2/2022 revealed that S2 worked at the facility for approximately 6 weeks. S1 did not provide an exact start date but confirmed S1 was working at the facility on/around 1/22/2022 when interviewed on 2/2/2022. Staff S3, who is fingerprint cleared is associated to this facility effective 2/9/2022. S3 was previously working for a related facility. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8, the following deficiency (1) is cited today. See 809D for deficiency cited. Exit interview by phone with Administrator. Authorization given to caregiver to sign. Copy of report and appeal rights emailed to Administrator following today's inspection.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2022
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 10, 2022
87355 Criminal Record Clearance (e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (1) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Department. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted and documentation reviewed, the Licensee did not ensure that staff (S1/S2) obtained a criminal record clearance prior to working, residing, volunteering at the facility, which posed an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 9, 2022
Plan of correction: Staff S1 obtained a criminal record clearance on 2/8/2022 and has been associated effective 2/8/2022 to the faciilty. S2 no longer works/volunteers at the facility as of 2/7/2022. Licensee/Administrator agree to read regulation 87355 and submit a signed statement to the department by fax, by 2/10/2022, that it is understood.
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the June 17, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa LLC, licensed since 2018.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2018, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 18
- Total complaints
- 3
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 0
- Type B citations
- 2
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2018, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 0 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 2 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 3 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa
Is Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa been cited?
0 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 18 state visits over the same years.
Is Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 11, 2026.
What does Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa cost?
$4,050 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,300–$5,000. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 54 other homes of a similar licensed size across Sacramento County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,500 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 54 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Mercy San Juan Medical Center is 3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “SPRING GLEN ELDERLY CARE VILLA”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #342700350. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Spring Glen Elderly Care Villa LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 18 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 0 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 18 state visits in that period.
- 3 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is June 17, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Sacramento County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,100On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,550 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,600On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,400 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,600–$5,400On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,250On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,000 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,300–$4,950On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Sacramento County