Grove Home Care is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento, Sacramento County, California — state license #342700018, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 16 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated March 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

13 homes in view

Grove Home Care

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Sacramento, CA · Sacramento County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #342700018, held since 2017 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
8410 Terracotta Circle · Sacramento, Sacramento County
Phone
(916) 225-6405
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 2 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 18 times and filed 16 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated March 16, 2026.

Most recent state visit
March 16, 2026
Occupancy at the November 4, 2025 visit
5 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 7 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 8, 2021 to November 4, 2025. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 7 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 16 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 4 documents
Mar 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 27, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 7, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 5 documents
Nov 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful Eviction

This is an amended report to ensure the document is correctly classified as a public document. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sommer Hayes arrived and met with Lucia Boboc to deliver investigation findings regarding complaint control number 27-AS-20250808162409, Unlawful eviction. LPA reviewed resident records including the admission agreement and 30-day eviction notice dated 08/05/25. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. LPA Hayes observed that the eviction notice (08/06/25) does not meet regulatory requirements, as it failed to include the approved eviction criteria outlined in Title 22 regulations. The notice cited R1’s pre-existing health conditions prior to admission as the reason for eviction, which does not comply with the specified regulatory standards. (Continued on 9099C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 4, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250808162409
Oct 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Untrained staff providing care to resident Staff are not providing adequate food service to resident Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings Staff are mismanaging resident's medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to follow up on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Lucia Boboc and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, record review, and observation. In interviews, a staff member (S3), a resident (R1), and a resident's responsible party (R1's RP) said there was a certain staff person working at this facility as a caregiver around December 2024 or January 2025, and identified this person by name (S4). Boboc was not familiar with any staff person by that name. Boboc reviewed Guardian records and was not able to identify this staff person among either active or separated employees. LPA Moleski asked for this staff person's file. Boboc did not have a file available for review. [continued on 9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 16, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250106153318
Sep 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jun 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure resident's medication was administered by an appropriately skilled professional. Staff do not ensure that the facility is free of pests.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Brown arrived unannounced on 6/26/24 at 4pm to conduct an investigation of the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Administrator Lucia Boboc and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews of residents 1-5 and staff 1-4, and the Hospice Representative during this visit. Regarding allegation, “Licensee did not ensure resident's medication was administered by an appropriately skilled professional” LPA conducted interviews of staff, residents, and hospice agency on 6/26/24. The investigation revealed that staff was not asssiting with administering morphine to R1. However, family of R1 was trained to do so. Regarding allegation, "Staff do not ensure that the facility is free of pests", LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility observing furniture, drawers, kitchen, and bedrooms. LPA did not observe insects in the home nor evidence of feces or droppings. Based on observation and interviews, at this time, the allegationsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 26, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240619141108
Feb 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations6typical 0
Substantiated complaints7typical 0
Total complaints5typical 0
State visits on file18typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2017.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202644020254522024220202311020222212021340
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Sacramento County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 225-6405

Is Grove Home Care licensed?

Yes — Grove Home Care is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Sacramento (Sacramento County): California license #342700018, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 16 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated March 16, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Grove Home Care care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Grove Home Care with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 2.

How much does Grove Home Care cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Grove Home Care's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Sacramento County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Grove Home Care accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Grove Home Care is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 6 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on November 4, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Grove Home Care?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 18 state visits and 16 dated documents since 2021 for Grove Home Care; 7 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 4, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

7 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful Eviction
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This is an amended report to ensure the document is correctly classified as a public document. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sommer Hayes arrived and met with Lucia Boboc to deliver investigation findings regarding complaint control number 27-AS-20250808162409, Unlawful eviction. LPA reviewed resident records including the admission agreement and 30-day eviction notice dated 08/05/25. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. LPA Hayes observed that the eviction notice (08/06/25) does not meet regulatory requirements, as it failed to include the approved eviction criteria outlined in Title 22 regulations. The notice cited R1’s pre-existing health conditions prior to admission as the reason for eviction, which does not comply with the specified regulatory standards. (Continued on 9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 4, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250808162409
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUntrained staff providing care to resident Staff are not providing adequate food service to resident Staff did not safeguard resident's personal belongings Staff are mismanaging resident's medication
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Vincent Moleski arrived unannounced to follow up on this complaint investigation. LPA Moleski met with facility administrator Lucia Boboc and explained the purpose of the visit. This investigation consisted of interviews, record review, and observation. In interviews, a staff member (S3), a resident (R1), and a resident's responsible party (R1's RP) said there was a certain staff person working at this facility as a caregiver around December 2024 or January 2025, and identified this person by name (S4). Boboc was not familiar with any staff person by that name. Boboc reviewed Guardian records and was not able to identify this staff person among either active or separated employees. LPA Moleski asked for this staff person's file. Boboc did not have a file available for review. [continued on 9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 16, 2025 · control 27-AS-20250106153318

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not ensure resident's medication was administered by an appropriately skilled professional. Staff do not ensure that the facility is free of pests.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Victoria Brown arrived unannounced on 6/26/24 at 4pm to conduct an investigation of the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Administrator Lucia Boboc and stated the purpose of the visit. LPA conducted interviews of residents 1-5 and staff 1-4, and the Hospice Representative during this visit. Regarding allegation, “Licensee did not ensure resident's medication was administered by an appropriately skilled professional” LPA conducted interviews of staff, residents, and hospice agency on 6/26/24. The investigation revealed that staff was not asssiting with administering morphine to R1. However, family of R1 was trained to do so. Regarding allegation, "Staff do not ensure that the facility is free of pests", LPA conducted a physical plant tour of the facility observing furniture, drawers, kitchen, and bedrooms. LPA did not observe insects in the home nor evidence of feces or droppings. Based on observation and interviews, at this time, the allegationsCDSS inspection report, June 26, 2024 · control 27-AS-20240619141108

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility refused to give refund balance after resident had passed away Facility not following Admissions agreement
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Anthony Tuck arrived to the facility location on 05/12/2022 unannounced. LPA was met by Administrator Lucia Boboc and explained the purpose of today's visit to open and investigate a complaint regarding the allegations listed above. LPA requested and reviewed a copy of the admissions agreement for deceased resident. LPA requested a copy and reviewed an email notice for termination of a admission agreement for the deceased resident from the responsible party. LPA requested and reviewed a copy of the text message between the administrator and a family member of the deceased resident. LPA conducted an interview with the Administrator and 1 staff. LPA conducted a phone interview with 2 family members. Based upon review of the admission agreement and interviews with the administrator, it was learned that, a refund was not issued to the responsible party based on the confirmed date of all personal belongings being removed from the facility. The Administrator aCDSS inspection report, May 12, 2022 · control 27-AS-20220505135231

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 18 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
6
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
7
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
18
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 225-6405
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Grove Home Care? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.