Peppermint Ridge is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Corona, Riverside County, California — state license #335530186, licensed for 4 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 7 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated March 4, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

8 homes in view

Peppermint Ridge

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 4 residents · Corona, CA · Riverside County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #335530186, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
648 Locust St · Corona, Riverside County
Phone
(951) 273-7320
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 4 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 2 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR TWO (2). APPROVED FOR FOUR (4) NON-AMBULATORY/BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS. DELAYED EGRESS IS NOT PERMITTED.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 8 times and filed 7 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on March 4, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
March 4, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
4 of 4 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 22, 2025 to March 4, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 7 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 2 documents
Mar 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate food service

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Stephanie Barron. On February 24, 2026, it was alleged that staff did not provide adequate food service. According to the allegation received, the food that was bought for the facility was food that residents do not eat or cannot eat. It was alleged that staff are only providing residents with food that staff enjoy and residents do not. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff and resident interviews. [CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C] Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260224094307
Mar 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not ensure the facility had sufficient staffing. Licensee falsified records.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Operations Manager Jessica Paz. On October 6, 2025, it was alleged that licensee did not ensure the facility had sufficient staffing and licensee falsified records. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff and resident interviews. According to the allegations received, Resident #1 (R1) requires a Hoyer lift and two staff members to transfer them. However, the facility was understaffed and there have been incidents where there is only one staff member at the facility. Also, the staff were incorrectly filling out Medication Administration Records (MARs) and other pertinent documents at the facility. [Continued on LIC9099-C] Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251006094602
Sep 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is verbally abusing residents. Staff are mismanaging resident's medications. Staff are not meeting resident's medical needs. Staff are not providing adequate supervision.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Jessica Paz and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of resident and staff interviews and record review. For the allegation, staff is verbally abusing residents. LPA conducted (2) resident interviews. 2 out of the 2 residents stated facility staff do not verbally abuse them. LPA conducted (2) staff interviews. 2 out of the 2 facility staff stated they have not verbally abused any of the clients in care and have not witnessed other facility staff do so. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250916084407
Aug 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Jul 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 11, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file8typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202612020253312024220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,000$5,000 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (951) 273-7320

Is Peppermint Ridge licensed?

Yes — Peppermint Ridge is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Corona (Riverside County): California license #335530186, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 4 residents. State records list 7 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated March 4, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Peppermint Ridge care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Peppermint Ridge with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR TWO (2). APPROVED FOR FOUR (4) NON-AMBULATORY/BEDRIDDEN RESIDENTS. DELAYED EGRESS IS NOT PERMITTED.

How much does Peppermint Ridge cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Peppermint Ridge's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Peppermint Ridge accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Peppermint Ridge is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 4 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on March 4, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Peppermint Ridge?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 8 state visits and 7 dated documents since 2024 for Peppermint Ridge; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 4, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate food service
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegation. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Administrator Stephanie Barron. On February 24, 2026, it was alleged that staff did not provide adequate food service. According to the allegation received, the food that was bought for the facility was food that residents do not eat or cannot eat. It was alleged that staff are only providing residents with food that staff enjoy and residents do not. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff and resident interviews. [CONTINUED ON LIC9099-C] UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 4, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260224094307

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not ensure the facility had sufficient staffing. Licensee falsified records.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Hannah Rodgers conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings regarding the above complaint allegations. LPA introduced herself and disclosed the purpose of the visit to Operations Manager Jessica Paz. On October 6, 2025, it was alleged that licensee did not ensure the facility had sufficient staffing and licensee falsified records. The Department’s investigation consisted of an unannounced facility visit, records review, and staff and resident interviews. According to the allegations received, Resident #1 (R1) requires a Hoyer lift and two staff members to transfer them. However, the facility was understaffed and there have been incidents where there is only one staff member at the facility. Also, the staff were incorrectly filling out Medication Administration Records (MARs) and other pertinent documents at the facility. [Continued on LIC9099-C] SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 24, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251006094602
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is verbally abusing residents. Staff are mismanaging resident's medications. Staff are not meeting resident's medical needs. Staff are not providing adequate supervision.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Raquel Hernandez conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA met with Administrator Jessica Paz and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of resident and staff interviews and record review. For the allegation, staff is verbally abusing residents. LPA conducted (2) resident interviews. 2 out of the 2 residents stated facility staff do not verbally abuse them. LPA conducted (2) staff interviews. 2 out of the 2 facility staff stated they have not verbally abused any of the clients in care and have not witnessed other facility staff do so. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 22, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250916084407

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 8 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
8
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(951) 273-7320
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Peppermint Ridge? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.