Gardens Of Riverside, The is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Riverside, Riverside County, California — state license #335530134, licensed for 98 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 10 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2025, the most recent dated May 19, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

4 homes in view

Gardens Of Riverside, The

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 98 residents · Riverside, CA · Riverside County
LicensedMemory careHospiceBedriddenWheelchair not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #335530134, held since 2025 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
10849 Arlington Avenue · Riverside, Riverside County
Phone
(951) 637-8844
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 20 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 & OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR 98 NON-AMBULATORIES WHERE 10 CAN BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM 1,2,4,5,&12 IN JASMINE BUILDING. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS DOOR IN JASMINE BUILDING. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 20 RESIDENTS.State service designations983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2025, the state has visited this home 12 times and filed 10 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on May 19, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Substantiated.”

Most recent state visit
May 19, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
85 of 98 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 7 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 12, 2025 to May 19, 2026. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 7 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 10 of 10 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 6 documents
May 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek medical attention to resident resulting in hospitalization.

First Allegation: Staff did not seek medical attention to resident resulting in R#1’s hospitalization. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on a complaint alleging Staff did not seek medical attention to resident resulting in R#1’s hospitalization. LPA Singh met with Wellness Director Victoria Ong, facility representative. The investigation conducted by Department staff consisted of interviews and reviews of pertinent records. Department Staff substantiated the allegation of neglect and lack of care and supervision regarding Resident #1, concluding that staff failed to seek timely medical attention, which ultimately led to the residents’ hospitalization. During an interview, the family of Resident #1 reported observing significant signs of physical and cognitive decline during a visit on September 29, 2025, two days before the resident was transferred to the hospital. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2026 · control 56-AS-20251008213046
Apr 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet resident’s hygiene needs.

On 04/30/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate and deliver findings on a complaint alleging Staff did not meet resident’s hygiene needs. LPA Singh met with Facility Administrator Griselda Gracie Garcia, facility representative and was informed of the visit, the investigation conducted by LPA Singh consisted of interviews and records review. Allegation:Staff did not meet resident’s hygiene needs. LPA Singh conducted a quick tour of the facility, interviewed residents and staff, obtained pertinent documents. According to the Innovage Social Worker, Resident #1 is currently undergoing treatment for a persistent foot fungus at one of the rehabilitation center, with plans for a transfer to a new facility once his medical care is complete, this condition is not a new development, as it has afflicted the resident since his initial admission to the Garden of Riverside and was managed by Innovage nurses throughout his stay tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 30, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260212151830
Apr 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner resulting in an injury.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering findings into the above complaint allegation. LPA met with Facility Administrator Garcie Garcia. and explained the reason for the visit. Regarding the allegation:- Staff handled resident in a rough manner resulting in an injury. LPA Singh conducted a walk thorough of the facility and interviewed staff and residents. Five(5) out of Five(5) residents and Five(5) out of Five(5) staff stated that staff never handles residents in a rough manner and are always kind and professional with residents in care. LPA's observation, interviews with family and Staff, Due to a decline in cognitive status, Resident #1 lacks the mental capacity to identify the specific staff member allegedly involved in an incident of rough handling. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 30, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260224160252
Apr 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff not allowing family to visit resident. Facility not providing adequate supervision for residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Griselda Gracie Garcia, and discussed the purpose of the visit. First Allegation:-Facility staff not allowing family to visit resident. During the investigation, LPA Singh was not able to find sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Five(5) out of Five(5) staff and Five(5) out of Five(5) residents confirmed that family visitations are permitted during designated hours, provided that family members notify management or staff of their intent to visit. During the inspection, LPA Singh reviewed the facility's log records, which verified that Resident #1’s family members were consistently allowed to meet and visit with them at the facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 30, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260218161029
Jan 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff refused to accept resident back from hospital.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate and deliver findings on a complaint alleging Staff refused to accept resident back from hospital. LPA Singh met with Facility Administrator Griselda Gracie Garcia, facility representative and was informed of the visit, the investigation conducted by LPA Singh consisted of interviews and records review. Allegation:-Staff refused to accept resident back from hospital. LPA Singh interviewed and reviewed records staff and residents; four(4) out of four (4) staff present on the day at the incident reported that R#1 has exhibited behavioral episodes over the past few months. On January 22, 2026, R#1 was observed swinging a walker at other residents, attacking staff, and attempting to leave the facility. Staff reported that Community Care Licensing Department(CCLD) had been notified of Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260123094442
Jan 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 4 documents
Dec 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Lack of staff supervision resulting in resident eloping from facility.

On 12/01/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of initiating an investigation into the above complaint allegation. LPA met with Facility Administrator Griselda Gracie Garcia and explained the reason for the visit. For the allegation, Lack of staff supervision resulting in resident eloping from facility. LPA spoke to Administrator who stated Resident#1 (R1) did not eloped from the facility on 11/22/2025, Administrator reported that Resident in question followed workers from the side gate and staff brought R1 back from the front facility door and informed the family. Administrator stated staff do provide adequate supervision for resident in care and do follow and supervise residents. LPA interviewed five (5) staff and five(5) out of five stated facility staff supervises residents in care and denies the allegation that lack of staff supervision resulted in resident eloping from facility. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251124154956
Aug 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit a resident while in care. Staff threatened a resident while in care.

On 8/12/2025 at 11:50 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on a complaint alleging neglect/lack of supervision. LPA Singh met with Facility Executive Director Griselda Gracie Garcia, facility representative, and was granted entry into the facility. The investigation conducted by Department staff consisted of interviews and reviews of pertinent records. First Allegation: Staff hit a resident while in care. The allegation of Physical abuse against resident#1 (R1) is found to be Unsubstantiated. While the resident made verbal statements alleging that R1 was “hit” by a caregiver, there were no direct witnesses to the alleged physical abuse. Records show that R1 has cognitive impairment and dementia, making R1 unable to consistently recall or provide accurate information about the incident. In addition, caregivers reported that R1 has a history of confusion and making inconsistent statements. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 12, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250325093823
Jan 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints7typical 7
State visits on file12typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2025.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20263612025440
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Ask how the 2026 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (951) 637-8844

Is Gardens Of Riverside, The licensed?

Yes — Gardens Of Riverside, The is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Riverside (Riverside County): California license #335530134, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 98 residents. State records list 10 inspection and complaint documents since 2025; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 19, 2026, was marked “Substantiated” by the state.

Can Gardens Of Riverside, The care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Gardens Of Riverside, The with clearances for dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 & OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE APPROVED FOR 98 NON-AMBULATORIES WHERE 10 CAN BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM 1,2,4,5,&12 IN JASMINE BUILDING. APPROVED FOR DELAYED EGRESS DOOR IN JASMINE BUILDING. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR 20 RESIDENTS.

How much does Gardens Of Riverside, The cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Gardens Of Riverside, The's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Gardens Of Riverside, The accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Gardens Of Riverside, The through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Riverside County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

85 of 98 beds occupied (87%) when the state visited on May 19, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Gardens Of Riverside, The?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 12 state visits and 10 dated documents since 2025 for Gardens Of Riverside, The; 7 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated May 19, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

7 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek medical attention to resident resulting in hospitalization.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
First Allegation: Staff did not seek medical attention to resident resulting in R#1’s hospitalization. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on a complaint alleging Staff did not seek medical attention to resident resulting in R#1’s hospitalization. LPA Singh met with Wellness Director Victoria Ong, facility representative. The investigation conducted by Department staff consisted of interviews and reviews of pertinent records. Department Staff substantiated the allegation of neglect and lack of care and supervision regarding Resident #1, concluding that staff failed to seek timely medical attention, which ultimately led to the residents’ hospitalization. During an interview, the family of Resident #1 reported observing significant signs of physical and cognitive decline during a visit on September 29, 2025, two days before the resident was transferred to the hospital. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 19, 2026 · control 56-AS-20251008213046
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not meet resident’s hygiene needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 04/30/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate and deliver findings on a complaint alleging Staff did not meet resident’s hygiene needs. LPA Singh met with Facility Administrator Griselda Gracie Garcia, facility representative and was informed of the visit, the investigation conducted by LPA Singh consisted of interviews and records review. Allegation:Staff did not meet resident’s hygiene needs. LPA Singh conducted a quick tour of the facility, interviewed residents and staff, obtained pertinent documents. According to the Innovage Social Worker, Resident #1 is currently undergoing treatment for a persistent foot fungus at one of the rehabilitation center, with plans for a transfer to a new facility once his medical care is complete, this condition is not a new development, as it has afflicted the resident since his initial admission to the Garden of Riverside and was managed by Innovage nurses throughout his stay tCDSS inspection report, April 30, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260212151830
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handled resident in a rough manner resulting in an injury.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of delivering findings into the above complaint allegation. LPA met with Facility Administrator Garcie Garcia. and explained the reason for the visit. Regarding the allegation:- Staff handled resident in a rough manner resulting in an injury. LPA Singh conducted a walk thorough of the facility and interviewed staff and residents. Five(5) out of Five(5) residents and Five(5) out of Five(5) staff stated that staff never handles residents in a rough manner and are always kind and professional with residents in care. LPA's observation, interviews with family and Staff, Due to a decline in cognitive status, Resident #1 lacks the mental capacity to identify the specific staff member allegedly involved in an incident of rough handling. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 30, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260224160252
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff not allowing family to visit resident. Facility not providing adequate supervision for residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Griselda Gracie Garcia, and discussed the purpose of the visit. First Allegation:-Facility staff not allowing family to visit resident. During the investigation, LPA Singh was not able to find sufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation. Five(5) out of Five(5) staff and Five(5) out of Five(5) residents confirmed that family visitations are permitted during designated hours, provided that family members notify management or staff of their intent to visit. During the inspection, LPA Singh reviewed the facility's log records, which verified that Resident #1’s family members were consistently allowed to meet and visit with them at the facility. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 30, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260218161029
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff refused to accept resident back from hospital.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate and deliver findings on a complaint alleging Staff refused to accept resident back from hospital. LPA Singh met with Facility Administrator Griselda Gracie Garcia, facility representative and was informed of the visit, the investigation conducted by LPA Singh consisted of interviews and records review. Allegation:-Staff refused to accept resident back from hospital. LPA Singh interviewed and reviewed records staff and residents; four(4) out of four (4) staff present on the day at the incident reported that R#1 has exhibited behavioral episodes over the past few months. On January 22, 2026, R#1 was observed swinging a walker at other residents, attacking staff, and attempting to leave the facility. Staff reported that Community Care Licensing Department(CCLD) had been notified of UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 28, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260123094442

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of staff supervision resulting in resident eloping from facility.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 12/01/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of initiating an investigation into the above complaint allegation. LPA met with Facility Administrator Griselda Gracie Garcia and explained the reason for the visit. For the allegation, Lack of staff supervision resulting in resident eloping from facility. LPA spoke to Administrator who stated Resident#1 (R1) did not eloped from the facility on 11/22/2025, Administrator reported that Resident in question followed workers from the side gate and staff brought R1 back from the front facility door and informed the family. Administrator stated staff do provide adequate supervision for resident in care and do follow and supervise residents. LPA interviewed five (5) staff and five(5) out of five stated facility staff supervises residents in care and denies the allegation that lack of staff supervision resulted in resident eloping from facility. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 1, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251124154956
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff hit a resident while in care. Staff threatened a resident while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 8/12/2025 at 11:50 AM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings on a complaint alleging neglect/lack of supervision. LPA Singh met with Facility Executive Director Griselda Gracie Garcia, facility representative, and was granted entry into the facility. The investigation conducted by Department staff consisted of interviews and reviews of pertinent records. First Allegation: Staff hit a resident while in care. The allegation of Physical abuse against resident#1 (R1) is found to be Unsubstantiated. While the resident made verbal statements alleging that R1 was “hit” by a caregiver, there were no direct witnesses to the alleged physical abuse. Records show that R1 has cognitive impairment and dementia, making R1 unable to consistently recall or provide accurate information about the incident. In addition, caregivers reported that R1 has a history of confusion and making inconsistent statements. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 12, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250325093823

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 12 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
7
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
12
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(951) 637-8844
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Gardens Of Riverside, The? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.