Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Sierra Pines Guest Home

Mid-size home·Licensed for 25·Riverside, California

Licensed since 2023Licence #335530063Medi-Cal ALW
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 27, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,200 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,300–$5,550
  • Home sizeLicensed for 25Mid-size care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit24 of 25 beds occupiedDecember 17, 2024 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payMedi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · September 23, 2026
  • Last state visitJanuary 15, 2026CDSS inspection record

Sierra Pines Guest Home is a mid-size care home in Riverside — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 25 residents since 2023. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 27, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Sierra Pines Guest Home

Is Sierra Pines Guest Home licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

How many residents is Sierra Pines Guest Home licensed for?

25 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Has Sierra Pines Guest Home been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. Those records count 11 state visits over the same years.

Is Sierra Pines Guest Home still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Sierra Pines Guest Home cost?

$4,200 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,300–$5,550. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 31 other homes of a similar licensed size in Riverside that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,925 to $4,725 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 31 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Sierra Pines Guest Home take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Sierra Pines Guest Home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Kaiser Foundation Hospital Riverside is 1.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Sierra Pines Guest Home keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.

Sierra Pines Guest Home license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “SIERRA PINES GUEST HOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #335530063. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed for 25 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • Licensed to Sierra Pines Guest Home, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 11 state inspection visits since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. The same records count 11 state visits in that period.
  • 4 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2023, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is January 15, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 27, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 25 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 27, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 25 NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 27, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 27, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,200a month to start

Likely $3,300–$5,550

From 9 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,200a month

Likely $3,300–$5,700

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,200likely $3,300–$5,550

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,300–$5,700
$4,200
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,000–$8,700
$6,200
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, September 23, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. For a resident on SSI/SSP, California’s 2026 standard sends $1,444.07 a month to the home for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 9 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

9 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,850–$5,000.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 9 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 5051 La Sierra Ave, Riverside, CA 92505Address from the public record · September 27, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2023, the state has filed 10 documents for this home, and its records count 11 visits since 2023. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 15, 2026.

On file since
2023
State visits
11
Most recent visit
January 15, 2026
Occupied · December 17, 2024 visit
24 of 25 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 4 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated April 11, 2024 to December 17, 2024. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (3). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 4 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations1typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 1
  • Substantiated allegations1typical 2
  • Total complaints4typical 6

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2023.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202511020244512023330

The last 36 months — 7 of 10 documents

20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 01/15/2025 at 09:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA Singh met with Staff-Carmencita fajardo and was granted entry to the facility. Facility manager Juana Hamed Shalaby arrived during the visit. At the time of the visit there were two (2) staff present, and twenty-three (22) residents present. The facility is a fourteen (14) bedroom, four (4) bathroom home with a kitchen/dining area, living room/activity room. The facility is Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). The facility is licensed for a capacity of twenty-five (25) non-ambulatory residents and approved for six (6) hospice waiver. The current census is twenty-three (22) residents. LPA Singh was accompanied by Staff-Carmencita Fajardo to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 73 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA Singh inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands and wall lamps, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were remodelled and clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA Singh observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA Singh measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathroom to be at 112 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Fire extinguishers were also observed at the facility. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, Ombudsman poster, labor laws, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. ***Continuation in LIC809C ** During the tour of the facility, LPA Singh observed cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept locked, inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. There is a Medicine Cabinet for the residents with the resident’s medications locked. LPA Singh observed the complete first aid kit and first aid book at the facility. Food Service: More than seven (7) days’ supply of Non-perishable foods and more than two (2) days’ supply of perishable food supply were observed and sufficient for the number of residents in care. Care & Supervision: The facility has an Administrator present in the facility with appropriate and enough hours to appropriately manage the facility. The facility has sufficient number of staff to provide care and supervision to the residents in care. Record Review: LPA Singh reviewed five (5) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, pre-placement appraisals and needs and services plans. LPA Singh observed resident files reviewed were complete. LPA Singh reviewed two (2) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, Dementia and other training, and health screenings. Last Fire drill completed on 11/15/2025 and Earthquake drill on 11/09/2025. Medications/Medication Administration Record (MAR) for five (5) residents and P&I were audited for three (3) residents, LPA Singh observed no issue. Liability insurance is valid from 09/2025 to 09/2026. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809),LIC 809C were discussed and provided to Facility manager Juana Hamed Shalaby.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Mar 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 03/12/2025 at 09:05 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA Singh met with Administrator Hanan Hamed and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there were three (3) staff present, and twenty-three (23) residents present. The facility is a fourteen (14) bedroom, four (4) bathroom home with a kitchen/dining area, living room/activity room. The facility is Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). The facility is licensed for a capacity of twenty-five (25) non-ambulatory residents and approved for six (6) hospice waiver. The current census is twenty-three (23) residents. LPA Singh was accompanied by Administrator Hanan Hamed to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature of 73 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA Singh inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands and wall lamps, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were remodelled and clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA Singh observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA Singh measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathroom to be at 110 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Fire extinguishers were also observed at the facility. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, Ombudsman poster, labor laws, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. ***Continuation in LIC809C ** During the tour of the facility, LPA Singh observed cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. There is a Medicine Cabinet for the residents with the resident’s medications locked. LPA Singh observed the complete first aid kit and first aid book at the facility. Food Service: More than seven (7) days’ supply of Non-perishable foods and more than two (2) days’ supply of perishable food supply were observed and sufficient for the number of residents in care. Care & Supervision: The facility has an Administrator present in the facility with appropriate and enough hours to appropriately manage the facility. The facility has sufficient number of staff to provide care and supervision to the residents in care. Record Review: LPA Singh reviewed four (4) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, pre-placement appraisals and needs and services plans. LPA Singh observed resident files reviewed were complete. LPA Singh reviewed four (4) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, Dementia and other trainings, and health screenings. Last Fire drill completed on 01/8/2025. Medications/Medication Administration Record (MAR) for Resident#and P&I for R#1 and R#4 were audited, and LPA Singh observed no issue. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809),LIC 809C were discussed and provided to Administrator Hanan Hamedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee is financially abusing resident.

First Complaint: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA Singh met with Facility Licensee/Admicistrator Hanan Hamed and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation: Licensee is financially abusing resident. The investigation was conducted by LPA Beena Singh. The investigation consisted of file review and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation indicates that staff is financially abusing client in care. During the investigation, LPA Beena Singh did not find evidence to support the allegation. Interviews on11/27/2024 with Four (4) of five (5) clients indicated that there's no staff at the facility that's financially abusing them. Unsubstantiated Four (4)) of five (5) clients interviewed by LPA Singh, revealed there's no incident that happened at the facility that a staff or Staff #1 (S1) is financially abusing them, and they did not hear or witness a staff financially abusing Client #1 (C1). Moreover, interview with Licensee/ Administrator Staff#1, Client#1 has not been living in the facility since past three months and C#1 was admitted to Kaiser hospital on September 9th,2024 hospital and Innovage moved C#1 to nursing home in Los Angeles County as C#1 needed higher level of care. Per documents review, LPA Beena Singh observed in documentation that C1 was receiving Social Security benefits checks and as C#1 has no forwarding address, Staff#1 contacted Social Security Administration (SSA) to stop sending the facility until she can give SSA forwarding address and no money was used from C#1 SSA checks that has been received to the facility and SSA fund has been refunded to the SSA on 11/27/2024 and 12/06/2024. Based on the evidence found during the investigation, LPA Beena Singh found the allegations listed above to be Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Facility Administrator Hanan Hamed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241126085953
Dec 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff harassed resident in care.

First Complaint: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPA Singh met with Facility Administrator Hanan Hamed and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First Allegation, Staff harassed resident in care. LPA Singh interviewed Five (5) clients and according to five (5) out of five (5) clients, no one is persuading residents to switch providers and residents has not signed any insurance papers or documents at this facility. Facility has two insurance agencies coming to the facility due to residents have insurance with them but no other insurance agency visits the facility. Unsubstantiated C#1 stated C#1 still have same insurance company. Clients at the facility deny having any issues with staff harassing residents regarding switching insurance providers. Based on the evidence found during the investigation, LPA Singh found the allegations listed above to be Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated: A finding that the complaints are Unsubstantiated means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Facility Administrator Hanan Hamed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 17, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241204113058
Dec 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff inappropriately moved resident to another facility. Staff did not notify resident's authorized representative of the move. Staff inappropriately had resident sign doucments without authorized representative. Staff are not providing resident's authorized representative with signed documents and records.

First Complaint: Licensing Program Analyst (LPAs) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the allegations listed above. LPAs met with Facility administrator Hanan Hamed and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews and review of records. First allegation: Staff inappropriately moved resident to another facility. Licensing Program Analyst Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to this facility for the purpose of delivering findings for the above allegation. During interviews with facility administrator and records,she reported that R#1 was given notice of moving to another facility and R#1 family was contacted on the phone and have been informed of this move. Documents have been collected from the administrator Hana Hamed. Unsubstantiated Second Allegation: Staff did not notify resident's authorized representative of the move. Licensing Program Analyst Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to this facility for the purpose of delivering findings for the above allegation. During Interviews with Facility Administrator Hanan Hamed, she reported that R#1 daughter has been informed of facility moving R#1 to another facility. Records and documentation of phone communication has been provided with the report. Third Allegation: Staff inappropriately had resident sign documents without authorized representative. Licensing Program Analyst Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to this facility for the purpose of delivering findings for the above allegation. During interviews with staffs at the facility, all staff who were interviewed denied R#1 was being moved to other facility without the notice. According to the records R#1 is being capable of signing any documents on his own and can make decisions, all staff interviewed verified there was no evidence of a violation. Fourth Allegation: Staff are not providing resident's authorized representative with signed documents and records. Licensing Program Analyst Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to this facility for the purpose of delivering findings for the above allegation. During Interviews with Facility administrator and staff R#1 has not requested any documents or records from the facility as there are no Life insurance documents has been signed by R#1 while he was at the facility. Based on the evidence found during the investigation, LPA Beena Singh found the allegation listed above to be Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated: A finding that the complaints are Unsubstantiated means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Facility administrator Hanan Hamed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 6, 2024 · control 56-AS-20241001153001
Apr 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff is serving as resident's power of attorney.

On 04/11/2024 at 01:45 PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to commence a complaint investigation. LPA Brown was greeted and granted entrance by a staff member and LPA Brown met with staff Carmencita Fajardo . LPA Brown identified herself and discussed the purpose of the visit and the elements of the allegation with staff Carmencita Fajardo. The investigation was conducted by LPA Brown. The investigation consisted of file review and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation indicated that Facility staff is serving as resident's power of attorney. LPA Brown was able to obtain evidence to corroborate the allegation. Interview with Resident #1 (R1) indicated that R1 does not have an idea that R1 designated Staff #1 (S1) as R1's Power of Attorney (POA). R1 reported to LPA Brown that R1 did not sign a POA document indicating S1 as R1's POA. ***Continuation on LIC9099C*** Substantiated LPA Brown interviewed S1 and S1 confirmed to LPA Brown that S1 is R1's POA. S1 revealed to LPA Brown that S1's unaware that a facility staff's not allowed as POA for a resident. LPA Brown reviewed R1's facility documents and LPA Brown observed R1's signed and notarized durable Power of Attorney assigning S1 as R1's POA on 10/18/2022. Based on LPA Brown’s observations and interviews and review of records, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation Facility staff is serving as resident's power of attorney is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations, (Title 22, Division 6, Health and Safety Code) is being cited on the attached LIC9099D. An exit interview was conducted where this report, LIC9099, LIC9099D, and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to staff Carmencita Fajardo.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 11, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240409145944

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: HSC 1569.269(a)(29)(C) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 12, 2024

1569.269 Enumerated rights; severability (a) Residents of residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following rights: (29)To manage their financial affairs. A licensee shall not require residents to deposit their personal funds with the licensee. Except as provided in approved continuing care agreements, a licensee, or a spouse, domestic partner, relative, or employee of a licensee, shall not do any of the following: (C) Serve as an agent for a resident under any general or special power of attorney. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview and record review, the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above by alowing Staff #1 (S1) as Resident #1 (R1) Power of Attorney as evidenced of Signed and Notarized Power of Attorney with date 10/18/2022 which pose an immediate health, safety and personal rights risks to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 11, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee stated to cease S1 as the POA for R1 and start the Public Guardian Application for R1 and submit proof to LPA Brown on Plan of Correction (POC) due date. Licensee stated to submit Signed Statement of Understanding on HSC 1569.269(a)(29)(C) and a statement that will reflect that S1 will no longer be R1's POA to LPA Brown on Plan of Correction (POC) due date.

Feb 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 02/23/2024 at 09:45 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection. LPA Brown met with a staff and was granted entry to the facility. Administrator Hanan Hamed met with LPA Melody Brown during the visit. At the time of the visit there were three (3) staff present, and twenty-three (23) residents present. The facility is a fourteen (14) bedroom, four (4) bathroom home with a kitchen/dining area, living room/activity room. The facility is Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). The facility is licensed for a capacity of twenty-five (25) non-ambulatory residents and approved for six (6) hospice waiver. The current census is twenty-three (23) residents. LPA Brown was accompanied by Administrator Hanan Hamed to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA Brown inspected resident bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, nightstands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA Brown observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA Brown measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathroom to be at 106 degrees Fahrenheit. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Fire extinguishers were also observed at the facility. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, Ombudsman poster, labor laws, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. ***Continuation in LIC809C *** During the tour of the facility, LPA Brown observed two (2) screen window in disrepair. Deficiency will be issued. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to residents in care. There was a designated storage space for resident/staff files. There is a Medicine Cabinet for the residents with the resident’s medications locked. LPA Brown observed the complete first aid kit and first aid book at the facility. Food Service: More than seven (7) days’ supply of Non-perishable foods and more than two (2) days’ supply of perishable food supply were observed and sufficient for the number of residents in care. Care & Supervision: The facility has an Administrator present in the facility with appropriate and enough hours to appropriately manage the facility. The facility has sufficient number of staff to provide care and supervision to the residents in care. Record Review: LPA Brown reviewed four (4) resident files for admission agreements, updated physician reports, pre-placement appraisals and needs and services plans. LPA Brown observed resident files reviewed were complete. LPA Brown reviewed four (4) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, trainings, and health screenings. LPA Brown found that Staff #4 (S4) does not have Health Screening Report with Tuberculosis (TB) Result. Deficiency will be issued. Also, LPA Brown observed S4 did not complete the required 24 hour initial training. Deficiency will be issued. Moreover, Administrator Hamed reported that they have one (1) dementia resident and LPA Brown observed no staff at the facility completed trainings in dementia. Deficiency will be issued. Furthermore, LPA Brown observed no earthquake drill completed at the facility. Last Fire In-Service completed on 10/24/2023 but no Fire Drill completed. Deficiency will be issued. Medications/Medication Administration Record (MAR) were audited, and LPA Brown observed no issue. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809), LIC809D, LIC9102 forms, and Appeal Rights were discussed and provided to Administrator Hanan Hamedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 23, 2024

The state marks this report as 9 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Riverside County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Riverside County