Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Westhills Villa GardensLicense #331881251 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareWesthills Villa GardensLicense #331881251 · 5466 West Wilson St., Banning, CA · (951) 849-7521Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Riverside County/Banning/Westhills Villa Gardens
Map · 5466 West Wilson St.

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,400/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,800 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (951) 849-7521

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

WV

Call Westhills Villa Gardens

Banning · Licensed for 30

(951) 849-7521

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Mid-size home · Licensed for 30 · Banning

Westhills Villa Gardens

5466 West Wilson St., Banning, CA 92220 · Licensed since 2022

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Westhills Villa Gardens

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,400 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,800 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
  • Licensed for 30: a mid-size care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 30 residents
  • Dementia
  • Hospiceup to 30 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 15 residents

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 30 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAYBE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 30.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 30 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Westhills Villa Gardens: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,400a month to start

Likely $3,450–$5,800

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,400likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,400likely $3,450–$5,800

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,450–$5,950
$4,400
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,200–$9,050
$6,900
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,200 to $6,500

$3,200$6,500

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

8 homes like this within 10 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,250–$5,650.

  • Amazing Grace Care ServicesBeaumont · 1.1 mi · Small home
    $3,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
  • Sacred Heart Home for ElderlyBeaumont · 2.8 mi · Small home
    $4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Compassion Home 1Beaumont · 3.6 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Hillsong Senior LivingCalimesa · 7.0 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Calimesa Home CareCalimesa · 7.3 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Holy Hill Home Care EastYucaipa · 9.3 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Holy Hill Home CareYucaipa · 9.4 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Rose Alley Guest Home IIYucaipa · 9.9 mi · Small home
    $6,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

5466 West Wilson St., Banning, CA 92220Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1San Gorgonio Memorial HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list0.5 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #331881251 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 12 of 16 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 7 “Unsubstantiated” and 1 not transcribed yet.

20264 state visits · 4 documents

May 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

We haven’t transcribed this report yet. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Thelma Montebon, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (30), a current census of (18). LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility does not have a swimming pool or similar bodies of water. All Three (3) facility houses have sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for resident activities. The facility (Houses 1,2,3) are equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms, Fire Marshall conducted a visit on 03/17/26 with no deficiencies. Quick response fire protection also conducted an annual sprinkler test on 3/16/26 with no deficiencies. The facility has working laundry equipment, and telephone service. Resident’s showers, toilets, and hand washing areas were operating properly. In House #1 the hot water temperature in three (3) resident common bathrooms measured between 106.1 to 107.2 degrees F. Seven (7) resident’s bedrooms had beds, bed linen, chairs, dresser, storage space and sufficient lighting. In House #2 the hot water temperature measured 118 degree F, three (3) resident’s bedrooms had beds, bed linen, chairs, dresser, storage space and sufficient lighting. Continuation on LIC – 809C: In House #3 the hot water temperature measured 110 degree F, three (3) resident’s bedrooms had beds, bed linen, chairs, dresser, storage space and sufficient lighting. The facility has sufficient linens, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility (House #1) has posted in a common area, Resident Rights, Staff Schedule, Monthly Menu, Monthly Activities, facility sketch, Emergency disaster plan with emergency telephone numbers, CCLD complaint poster, and Ombudsman poster. Food Service: Facility kitchen and dining area are maintained clean. The facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. Sharps and chemicals were kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour/7days a week care staff. Facility staff working have current CPR/first aid training and background cleared. Medical Related Services: Resident’s medications are labeled and centrally stored in a locked cabinet. Four (4) residents medication were audited and administered per physicians orders, medication is being pre-poured too early, Technical Violation issued. Record Review: Four (4) Staff files reviewed were observed to be complete. Four (4) Resident files reviewed were observed to be complete. Last disaster drill conducted on 2/27/26. Based on observations and record review one (1) technical violation was discussed and no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report along with LIC 9102 was discussed and provided to Administrator Thelma Montebon at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 23, 2026

The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Apr 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained bedsore (stage 4 - unstageable) due to staff neglect.

On 04/08/2026, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to initiate and deliver findings on the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted by Facility administrator and granted entry to the facility and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of interviews, observations, and review of records. First Allegation: Resident sustained bedsore (stage 4 - unstageable) due to staff neglect. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Singh conducted a comprehensive review of facility records, confirming that Resident #1 (R#1) was receiving hospice and home health services specifically for wound care, repositioning, and assistance with activities of daily living (ADL). Additionally, all eight residents interviewed expressed complete satisfaction with their care, specifically noting that staff are always available for daily assistance and ensure that bedridden residents are regularly repositioned and helped with personal needs. LPA Singh observed that the facility was clean and sanitary throughout the visit. Residents were seen resting comfortably in their beds or participating in seated exercises with the active assistance of staff members. Unsubstantiated Furthermore, eight (8) out of eight(8) residents verified that bedridden individuals are regularly repositioned and receive diligent assistance with toileting and other essential care needs, indicating that the facility is maintaining appropriate standards of supervision and physical support. Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the allegation listed Resident sustained bedsore (stage 4 - unstageable) due to staff neglect is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed, signed and provided to Facility Administrator- Thelma Monteban, facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 8, 2026 · control 56-AS-20241016133606
Mar 19, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee is not providing resident's records to their representative as necessary.

On 3/19/2026, at 8:50 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Beena Singh conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to deliver findings for a complaint investigation. LPA Singh met with a staff,greeted and granted entry to the facility. Facility Administrator, Thelma Montebon, was informed, arrived during the visit and LPA Singh explained the purpose of the visit to the facility administrator. Allegation:Licensee is not providing resident's records to their representative as necessary. During the investigation, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Singh reviewed Statements, records, and interviews obtained did not provide sufficient information to corroborate the allegation.LPA Singh determined after reviewing all the records,interview with the licensee and staff that there was insufficient evidence to corroborate the allegation that the licensee failed to provide resident records to an authorized representative. Unsubstantiated The review revealed that Resident #1 (R#1) is under the legal authority of a public guardian/conservator who makes decisions on R#1's behalf. The facility successfully maintained communication with this conservator regarding R#1’s change in condition, including R#1's subsequent transfer to a hospital and a skilled nursing facility for a higher level of care. Furthermore, when R#1’s family requested records, the licensee provided the documentation to the family's legal counsel under the specific direction of the public guardian/conservator of Resident#1. Based on the evidence found during the investigation, the allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where this report LIC9099 was discussed,signed and a copy provided to Facility Administrator Thelma Montebon at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2026 · control 56-AS-20250709093102

20256 state visits · 6 documents

Dec 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unqualified staff providing care to resident Staff did not assess resident upon admission

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Sarina Ramirez and Andrew Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation into the above allegations. LPAs met with Administrator Thelma Montebon and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation #1, Based on LPAs record review and interviews, staff are trained in providing appropriate care for all residents prior to starting their position. LPAs obtained pertinent documents to corroborate that staff are providing qualified care for residents. Regarding allegation #2, Based on LPAs record review, R1 was assessed prior to admission. Based on interviews, Administrator informed LPAs that all residents are assessed prior to admission to ensure compatibility. Therefore, the alleged allegations have been determined Unsubstantiated. Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is no preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed, and a copy was provided to Administrator Thelma Montebon. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 16, 2025 · control 56-AS-20251211083312
Jul 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore initiated a case management based on complaint control#56-AS-20250709093102. LPA identified self, was granted entry and met with Administrator, Thelma Montebon. On 7/14/2025, LPA requested to view resident #1 (R1's) file at the facility. LPA was informed by Administrator Montebon that R1 has not been a resident since September 2024. R1's file was removed from the facility and currently at their headquarter office in Pasadena. Administrator stated that she called headquarters and will have the file available at the facility later today (7/14/25). A deficiency is being cited in accordance with Title 22, division 6, of the California Code of Regulations(CCR). An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy provided with appeal rights to Administrator Montebon at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(e) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 18, 2025

87506(e) Original records or photographic reproductions shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) years following termination of service to the resident...this requirement is not met as evidenced by: The licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not retaining former resident's record file at the facility for review for a minimum of three years after services, which poses a potentional health, safety, and personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2025

Plan of correction: The licensee/Administrator has agreed to provide resident records by POC due date.

Jun 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was physically assaulted by another resident in care. Staff yell at residents in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Thelma Montebon and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding allegation #1, Administrator informed LPA no residents have been in an altercation. LPA interviewed six (6) residents, all whom denied being in a physical altercation with other residents. Regarding allegation #2, staff deny yelling at residents. LPA interviewed six (6) residents all whom deny being yelled at by staff. Based on observation, interviews, and pertinent documents the allegations are unsubstantiated. An Unsubstantiated complaint means, that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Thelma Montebon and a copy of this report was provided at the conclusion of the visit. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 19, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250612161612
May 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff caused multiple injuries to residents in care. Facility staff left resident soiled for an extended period of time. Facility staff do not provide activities for residents.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Sarina Ramirez and Eldin Serrano conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPAs met with Administrator Thelma Montebon and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding Allegation #1, Based on observations and interviews with staff and residents, it was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) sustained multiple injuries by staff. LPAs did not observe injuries on R1 nor other residents in care, however Staff (S1) explained R1 recently sustained a cut on their leg due to their wheelchair. LPAs conducted 6 resident interviews, which all denied sustaining injuries from staff while in care. LPAs conducted 3 staff interviews all which denied handling residents in a rough manner causing any injuries to residents. Regarding Allegation #2, LPAs conducted 6 resident interviews, 4 out of 6 residents stated they do not wear diapers, 2 out of 6 residents stated they do wear diapers; however they are able to change their own diapers, but staff assist when needed. LPAs conducted 3 staff interviews all which denied leaving residents in soiled diapers for a long period of time. Unsubstantiated Regarding Allegation #3, LPAs observed an activities calendar posted in the dining room. LPAs observed most of the residents were in the living room watching tv. Based on interviews most residents like to participate in their own activities, however staff encourage them to exercise and walk around. Based on observation, interviews, and pertinent documents the allegations are unsubstantiated. An Unsubstantiated complaint means, that although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Thelma Montebon and a copy of this report was provided at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 29, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250527124010
Apr 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Administrator Thelma Montebon, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (30), a current census of (19). LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant/Environment: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility does not have a swimming pool or similar bodies of water. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. The facility has sufficient indoor and outdoor space for resident activities The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors/carbon monoxide alarms, Riverside County Fire last inspected 01/17/25, working laundry equipment, and telephone service. Resident’s showers, toilets, and hand washing areas were operating properly. The hot water temperature in four (4) resident bathrooms measured between 105.4 and 117 degrees F. Ten (10) resident’s bedrooms had beds, bed linen, chairs, dresser, storage space and sufficient lighting. The facility has sufficient linens, towels, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, facility license, Resident Rights, Personal Rights, Staff Schedule, Monthly Menu, Monthly Activities, facility sketch, CCLD complaint poster, and Ombudsman poster. Food Service: Facility kitchen and dining area are maintained clean. The facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. Sharps and chemicals were kept locked and inaccessible to residents in care. Continuation on LIC – 809C: Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour/7days a week care staff. Facility staff have current CPR/first aid training. Medical Related Services: Resident’s medications are labeled and centrally stored in a locked cabinet. Record Review: Five (5) Staff files reviewed were observed to be complete. Five (5) Resident files reviewed were observed to be complete. Based on observations and record review two (2) technical assistance were discussed and no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report along with LIC 902 was discussed and provided to Administrator Thelma Montebon.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 4, 2025

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Feb 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not dispense resident’s medications as prescribed. Licensee did not ensure injections were administered by an appropriately skilled professional. Staff used resident’s personal medical device on another resident. Staff did not ensure centrally stored medications were not accessible to residents. Staff did not assist resident with care needs in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarina Ramirez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation on the above allegations. LPA met Administrator Alma Espinal and discussed the purpose of the visit. During today’s visit, LPA conducted observations, interviewed staff, residents, outside parties and obtained facility records. Regarding allegation #1, LPA conducted 6 resident interviews. 2 out of 6 residents were unable to respond whether or not they receive medication as prescribed. 4 out of 6 residents informed LPA they receive their medication as prescribed. LPA conducted 3 staff interviews. 2 out of 3 staff informed LPA they administer medication daily as prescribed. 1 out of 3 staff informed LPA they do not administer medication. Unsubstantiated Based on LPA's observation and medication review, residents are receiving medication as prescribed by physician. Regarding allegation #2, R1 is the only resident who requires injections at the facility. An in home LVN nurse attends the facility three times a day to inject R1. LPA conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of 3 staff informed LPA they do not administer injections to residents. LPA conducted interview with in home nurse while at the facility and was informed they are the only person to administer injection to R1, LPA also observed in home nurse injecting R1 at the time of the visit. Regarding allegation #3, LPA conducted 3 staff interviews. 2 out of 3 staff informed LPA residents personal medical device is not used on other residents. 1 out of 3 staff informed LPA they are unaware which residents have a personal medical device. In home nurse informed LPA they are the one to use medical device on R1, and it is not used on any other resident. Regarding allegation #4, LPA observed centrally stored medications locked inaccessible to residents in care. Three (3) staff informed LPA medication is centrally stored and inaccessible to residents in care. Regarding allegation #5, LPA conducted 3 staff interviews. 3 out of 3 staff informed LPA they assist residents with care needs in a timely manner. LPA conducted 6 resident interviews, 2 out of 6 residents were unable to answer LPA's question. 4 out of 6 residents informed LPA staff assist with care needs in a timely manner. LPA obtained pertinent documents indicting the daily care needs that were provided to residents; such as diaper changes, showers, and medication distribution. Based on LPAs observations, record review, and interviews, the above allegations are Unsubstantiated; meaning that although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy was provided to Administrator Alma Espinal at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 12, 2025 · control 56-AS-20250206121636

20242 state visits · 2 documents

Jun 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff verbally abusing residents at the facility

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore conducted an unannounced complaint visit to the facility. LPA met with Alma Espinal, Administrator, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation, staff verbally abusing residents at the facilty, six (6) out of seven (7) residents interviewed deny that staff verbally abuse them. Five (5) staff interviewed deny verbally abusing residents and have not witnessed other staff verbally abuse residents. Based on LPA observations, resident and staff interviews, the above allegation is Unsubstantiated. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted where this report was discussed and a copy of this report with Appeal Rights was provided to the Administrator at the conclusion of the visit. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2024 · control 56-AS-20240220130906
Jan 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Magda Malcore made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA met with Maria Jasmin Dolores, Administrator, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The facility is a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE) with a license capacity of (30) and a current census of (21) residents in care. The facility has a hospice waiver for (30) residents. LPA conducted an overall inspection of the facility, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: Indoor and outdoor passageways are free of obstruction. The facility has no bodies of water accessible to residents in care. The facility has sufficient indoor space for resident activities. Outdoor activity space is fenced and sufficient for resident activities. The facility has sufficient lighting and is maintained at a comfortable temperature. Resident’s bathroom equipment were in operation condition. The hot water temperature in residents' bathrooms measured 105 to 118 degrees F; however, the facility did not ensure infection control practices were maintained by having uncovered trash containers with tissue in residents bathrooms. Resident’s bedrooms have sufficient lighting, operating signal system, and furniture in good repair. The facility has operating carbon monoxide alarms and telephone service. The facility has sufficient linen, blankets, and personal hygiene items for residents. The facility has posted in a common area, Community Care Licensing complaint poster, Ombudsman poster, resident's personal rights and emergency telephone numbers. Food Service: Facility has sufficient non-perishable and perishable food supply for residents in care. The refrigerator and freezer are operating in a healthful manner. Pesticides and other cleaning solutions were kept locked and stored away from food areas. Care & Supervision: Facility has 24-hour support staff. Record Review: Staff files reviewed were observed to be complete and included criminal record clearances or exemptions through the Department. Resident files reviewed were observed to be complete. Administrator’s certification expires on 7/15/2024. The facility did not have a current emergency drill conducted with staff on file. Medical Related Services: All medication is centrally stored and kept in a locked cabinet. The facility has a complete first aid kits with a first aid manual. Deficiencies are being cited per Title 22, Division 6 of The California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted where reports LIC809/LIC809-C/LIC809-D were discussed. Copies of the licensing reports with appeal rights were provided to the Administrator at the conclusion of the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 5, 2024
Earlier years2022 · 4 documents

20224 state visits · 4 documents

Nov 4, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner conducted an unannounced case management visit to amend and reissue forms for complaint 56-AS-20220628120253. LPA met with Administrator Maria Jasmin Dolores and explained the reason for the visit. LPA removed a deficiency from complaint number 56-AS-20220628120253 dated 7/5/2022 and is reissuing the same deficiency during this visit. LPA found that a incident occurred on 6/20/2022 with a resident leaving the facility without staffs knowledge. The staff was informed the resident was found at a nearby location when the residents responsible party received a phone call from the police department. This incident was not reported to state licensing within the required seven (7) day time frame which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care. During today’s visit, one (1) deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Administrator Maria Jasmin Dolores.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 4, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 6, 2022

87211. Reporting Requirements.(a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following:(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence of any of the events specified in (A) through (D) below. This report shall include the resident's name, age, sex and date of admission; date and nature of event; attending physician's name, findings, and treatment, if any; and disposition of the case. (D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident, such as psychological abuse of a resident by staff or other residents, or unexplained absence of any resident. This requirement was not met based on evidence by interview and document review. The licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not reporting an incident with a resident to state licensing within the required seven (7) day timeframe which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 4, 2022

Plan of correction: The licensee has agreed to read regulation 87211 entirely and send LPA self-certify letter that the regulation was read and understood. The licensee has agreed send licensing a special incident report for this incident. The licensee has agreed that moving forward all special incidents will be reported to licensing within the required time frame.

Jul 5, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent residents from wandering away from the facility.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of initiating an investigation and delivering findings for the above complaint allegation. LPA Gardner met with Assistant Maria Jasmin Dolores and explained the reason for the visit. At the time of the visit, there were nineteen (19) residents, and four (4) staff present. During today’s visit, LPA Gardner toured the facility, interviewed staff members, interviewed a resident, and reviewed facility records. For allegation, Staff did not prevent residents from wandering away from the facility: LPA Gardner found that resident R1 left the facility on 6/20/2022 without staff’s knowledge. The staff at the facility received a phone call from R1’s responsible party to inform staff that R1 had been found at an alternative location by a police officer. Substantiated LPA Gardner received R1’s physician’s report that states R1 has wandering behaviors. LPA Gardner received R1’s Resident Admission Appraisal that states R1 needs special observation at night because resident will leave. R1 lives in a cottage building behind the main facility building that requires staff to leave the main building to check on the resident. The day the incident occurred the resident went over two (2) hours without staff checking on the resident. The facility did not put additional safety measures in place to ensure R1 was safe due to R1's wandering behaviors. Based on the information found and provided, the allegation listed above is deemed SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. During today’s visit, one (1) deficiency was cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report was discussed and provided to Assistant Maria Jasmin Dolores, along with a copy of the appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 5, 2022 · control 56-AS-20220628120253

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87705(b)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 6, 2022

87705.Care of Persons with Dementia. (b) In addition to the requirements as specified in Section 87208, Plan of Operation, the plan of operation shall address the needs of residents with dementia, including:(2) Safety measures to address behaviors such as wandering, aggressive behavior and ingestion of toxic materials. This requirement was not met based on evidence by interview, observation, and document review. The licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having safety measures in place to keep dementia resident with wandering behaviors safe which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 5, 2022

Plan of correction: The licensee has agreed to read regulation 87705 entirely and send LPA self-certify letter that the regulation was read and understood. The licensee has agreed to put a plan in place to ensure the resident’s wandering behaviors are addressed and the resident is safe. The plan needs to be written in a letter and sent to LPA.

Feb 17, 2022Facility evaluation reportPrelicensingReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rohit Lama conducted an announced visit to the pending facility for a pre-licensing inspection. LPA met with Alma Espinal, Administrator. This facility was previously licensed as Golden Care Senior Living on Wilson (336402995) and is undergoing a change of ownership. The pending application is for a capacity of thirty (30) residents: fifteen (15) non-ambulatory and fifteen (15) bedridden residents in a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE). Fire clearance was granted by the City of Banning Fire Department for fifteen (15) non-ambulatory and fifteen (15) bedridden residents. There are charged fire extinguishers, operating smoke alarms, and carbon monoxide detectors. Emergency disaster plans, personal rights, and the Community Care Licensing poster were posted in a prominent area. The facility was equipped with a complete first aid kit and manual as well as emergency supplies. LPA toured the facility inside and out. The following was observed, reviewed, and inspected: The facility has 11 bedrooms, an office, living room, kitchen, dining area, backyard, two cottages with 3 additional rooms each, and a detached unit for laundry services. The physical plant, in general, was in good repair. The buildings and grounds were free from hazards. Outdoor and indoor passageways were kept free of obstruction. LPAs inspected the backyard. There was no obstruction on the side yard exits. The gates remained unlocked. LPA was informed that no firearms or ammunition will be kept at facility. Alma Espinal has a current Administrator's Certificate with an expiration date of: 4/1/2022. A renewal has already been issued with an expiration of 4/1/2024 ***CONTINUED ON LIC 809-C*** ***CONTINUED FROM LIC 809*** LPA inspected resident bedrooms. Resident bedrooms have the required bedding and furniture. All bedrooms included clean mattresses, closet space, night stands, dressers, and sufficient lighting. LPA inspected resident bathrooms. The bathrooms were operating in safe and sanitary conditions. LPA measured the hot water temperature, which measured within regulation at 109 degrees F. LPA also observed additional linen and hygiene items for the residents. LPA toured the kitchen. The facility had at least a 2-day supply of perishable food items and 7-day supply of non-perishable food items. The food was labeled with expiration dates and stored in a safe and healthful manner. The facility had a menu available for review. Dishes, glasses, and utensils were in good condition. There was a locked and centralized Medcart for medications. Cleaning supplies, toxins, and sharps were kept locked away and inaccessible to residents. Additionally, LPA observed facility to have required single entry point for COVID screening, upon entering facility. LPA observed required COVID signages throughout the facility, Visitation Vaccination Requirement and soap and disposable towels in bathrooms for washing hands. The facility had a designated area for resident and staff files, which was locked. The facility had working telephones for residents’ use. There was adequate seating in the common areas. LPAs observed activities for the residents such as books and games. At this time facility has shown to have met pre-licensing requirements. The facility was evaluated in accordance with Title 22 to ensure the health and safety of residents in care and meets regulation guidelines at this time. No corrections are needed. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report (LIC 809) was reviewed with and provided to Alma Espinal.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 17, 2022
Feb 2, 2022Facility evaluation reportOfficeReport on file

Type of visit: Office

Facility Type: RCFE Application Type: CHOW Capacity: (30) Census (if any clients in care): YES (14) Method: Telephone call with CAB COMP II Participants: KRISTINE JUAREZ & ESPINAL ALMA Applicant/administrator Applicant/administrator participated in COMP II via telephone call with the analyst at CAB. During COMP II, applicant and administrator confirmed the understanding of Title 22. Component II was successfully completed. During COMP II, CAB analyst confirmed Applicant/Administrator’s understanding of following areas: 1.Facility operation: License type, client/resident populations, and program 2.Staff qualifications and responsibilities 3.Applicant and Administrator qualifications 4.Program policy: Abuse, admission agreement, medication management, reporting incidents to CCL, restricted & prohibited conditions 5.Grievances, Complaints, Community resources 6.Physical plant, food service 7.Application document review and technical assistance: Criminal record clearance, Health screening, Fire clearance, First Aid/CPR certificate, Administrator certificate, Financial verification, Pre-licensing inspection, Compliance history, Control of property 8. Discussed the COVID-19 Mitigation Plan & PIN emailedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 2, 2022

18 of 30 beds were occupied at the April 8, 2026 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

All Health Group of Companies Inc., licensed since 2022.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2022, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
17
Total complaints
9
Substantiated allegations
1
Type A citations
1
Type B citations
0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2022, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations10
Type B citations01
Substantiated allegations12
Total complaints96

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 1,354 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Westhills Villa Gardens

Is Westhills Villa Gardens licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Westhills Villa Gardens licensed for?

30 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Westhills Villa Gardens been cited?

1 Type A and 0 Type B citation since 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 17 state visits over the same years.

Is Westhills Villa Gardens still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 10, 2026.

What does Westhills Villa Gardens cost?

$4,400 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,450–$5,800. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 homes with 7 to 49 beds and similar homes within 10 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 165 other homes of a similar licensed size across Riverside County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,800 to $5,000 a month, and the middle figure is $4,500 (n = 165 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does Westhills Villa Gardens take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by All Health Group of Companies Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

San Gorgonio Memorial Hospital is 0.5 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Westhills Villa Gardens keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 30 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Westhills Villa Gardens license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “WESTHILLS VILLA GARDENS”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #331881251. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 30 residents — a mid-size home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to All Health Group of Companies Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 17 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 1 Type A and 0 Type B citation on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 17 state visits in that period.
  • 9 complaints and 1 substantiated allegation on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is July 7, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Riverside County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Banning · 1.0 mi

    The Lakes

    Large community · licensed for 276

    Estimated starting rate

    $2,850 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $2,200–$3,650

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Beaumont · 1.1 mi

    Amazing Grace Care Services

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $3,200 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Beaumont · 1.2 mi

    Emory Terrace

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,400 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,600–$5,400

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Banning · 1.0 mi

    Westfield Villa Gardens

    Large community · licensed for 50

    Estimated starting rate

    $3,350 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $2,600–$4,250

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Beaumont · 1.4 mi

    A New Dawn Home Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,500 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,550

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    Beaumont · 2.1 mi

    Atienza Residential Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,150 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,100

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Riverside County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
WV

Call Westhills Villa Gardens

Banning · Licensed for 30

(951) 849-7521

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Westhills Villa Gardens

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages