Citrus Place is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Riverside, Riverside County, California — state license #331880924, licensed for 140 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 25 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 10, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

9 homes in view

Citrus Place

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 140 residents · Riverside, CA · Riverside County
LicensedBedriddenWheelchair not on fileMemory care not on fileHospice not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #331880924, held since 2020 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
7898 California Avenue · Riverside, Riverside County
Phone
(951) 687-2241
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 140 NON-AMBULTORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 34 times and filed 25 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 10, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 10, 2026
Occupancy at the April 2, 2026 visit
95 of 140 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 17 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 22, 2021 to April 2, 2026. 17 of the 17 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (11). 17 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 17 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 22 of 25 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 4 documents
Jun 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 15, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 2, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff do not observe residents for change in condition

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez met with Connections for Living Director Megan Snell, and explained both the purpose of the visit and the details of the allegation. On January 24, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint that facility staff do not observe residents for change in condition. It was alleged that R1 and R2 were experiencing cognitive decline and facility staff did not address their change in condition. According to Additional Witness 1 (AW1), both R1 and R2 were permitted to leave the community unsupervised when they should have been placed in a higher level of care. AW1 acknowledged reporting their concerns to management. Information from an interview with ED, stated that R1 and R2 resided in Independent Living and were not Assisted Living residents. A review of facility records, including resident rosters, dthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2026 · control 18-AS-20250124100551
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not give resident medication as prescribed

On 3/4/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Vicky Torres who who was informed of the purpose of the visit. It was alleged staff mismanaged Resident 1's (R1's) medication resulting in their hospitalization. LPA toured the facility, conducted interviews, and obtained copies of pertinent records. LPA reviewed R1's admission agreement dated 11/6/23 and section 14 notes medication will be monitored as prescribed by the Resident's doctor. LPA reviewed R1's Physician's Report for Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly dated 11/17/23 noting R1 does not have the capacity to store or administer their own prescription medications. LPA reviewed R1's assessment dated 1/9/25 noting R1 requires total assistance with medications. Administrator Torres was interviewed and reported when residents return from the hospital, the facility faxes the updated physician orders to tthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250225135432
20247 state visits · 15 documents
Dec 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not seek timely medical care for resident

Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility and met with Connections for living Director, Megan Snell. The purpose of the visit was to inform of the complaint allegation findings regarding the listed allegation. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with Administration, staff, clients, and additional witnesses. LPA also obtained pertinent documentation in order to assist with determining the findings. On December 2, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff did not seek timely medical care for resident. It was reported that facility staff failed to transport Client 1 (C1) to the hospital for evaluation after an injury was observed. Additionally, it was stated the injury was acknowledged during the morning shift and the facility did not seek medical attention until the afternoon. Information obtained from interviews with Administrator stated facility staff observed swelling to Cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 12, 2024 · control 18-AS-20241202144300
Dec 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to refill resident's medication

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Joseph Alejandre conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPAs toured the facility and interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as medication administration record (MAR). Regarding the allegation that staff failed to refill resident's medication, the investigation revealed the following: Per MAR, Resident 1 (R1) did not receive Tamulosin HCL on 01/16-01/19/2022 and on 01/31/2022 pending delivery of the medication. Facility staff indicated R1's medications are serviced through the VA pharmacy and facilitated by the resident's family member. Witness indicates facility failed to provide adequate notice when refills were due. Facility documentation on 01/12/2022 shows that the family member had visited the facility and medithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 3, 2024 · control 18-AS-20220204163100
Dec 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not providing adequate supervision to residents Staff left resident on the floor for an extended period of time Staff does not administer resident's medications as prescribed

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Joseph Alejandre conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPAs toured the facility and interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as incident reports. Regarding the allegations that staff are not providing adequate supervision to residents, staff does not administer resident's medications as prescribed and staff left resident on the floor for an extended period of time, the investigation revealed the following: Facility schedule indicates four caregivers and a med tech for 1st and 2nd shifts and two caregivers/ one med tech for the NOC shift. Nine out of nine staff state scheduling is adequate and staff are able to provide resident care including toileting, showering and assistance with eating. LPA observed residents beithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 3, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240429160126
Dec 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was left in soiled diapers/clothing for an extended period of time. Resident was not treated with dignity and respect. Resident's toileting needs were not being met.

LPAs Joseph Alejandre and Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPAs met with Executive Director Vicky Torres and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation, resident was left in soiled diapers/clothing for an extended period of time, revealed the following. W1 reported that on August 22, 2020, when they visited R1 they were wearing 2 diapers and they were soiled. LPA interviewed 2 staff who worked at the time R1 lived at the facility. Both staff reported that R1 was never put in 2 diapers and all residents were changed regularly. W1 reported that R1 was left soiled for long periods of time but did not provide any other dates when this took place. R1 could not be interviewed because they passed away in 2022. The former Executive Director reported that they were unaware of any residents that were left soiled for long periods of time. LPA interviewed 3 residents whothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 3, 2024 · control 18-AS-20211020123858
Dec 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 23, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee is not ensuring that staff are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet residents' needs. Staff yell at residents in care. Staff are being discouraged from reporting incidents involving residents in care.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Joseph Alejandre conducted an unannounced complaint visit to continue the investigation into the above allegations. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPAs toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as facility schedule. Regarding the allegations that licensee is not ensuring that staff are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet residents' needs, staff yell at residents in care and staff are being discouraged from reporting incidents involving residents in care, the investigation revealed the following: Facility schedule indicates Memory Care runs four caregivers and a med tech for 1st and 2nd shift and two caregivers/ one med tech for NOC shift. Seven out of nine staff interviewed state facility staffing levels are good and resident needsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 23, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240510123439
Nov 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from pushing another resident

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Joseph Alejandre conducted an unannounced complaint visit to continue the investigation into the above allegation. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation, the department toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as physician reports. Regarding the allegation that staff did not prevent resident from pushing another resident, the investigation revealed the following: On 04/13/2024, Resident 1 (R1) was being escorted back to the resident's room when R2 entered the room and became agitated. R2 pushed R1 and R1 fell and hit the head. R1 was transported to the hospital via 911 and returned with no new findings. Both residents are diagnosed with Dementia and denied the altercation occurred. Staff interviewed confirmed being present when the altercation occurred. Based on interviews conduthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240415154217
Nov 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following food safety protocols. Staff are falsifying medical documentation regarding residents in care. Staff are not reporting incidents involving residents in care. Staff are administering crushed medication(s) to resident(s) in care without physician(s)' permission. Staff are not reassessing residents as necessary.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Joseph Alejandre and Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings for the complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. LPAs met with Executive Director Vicky Torres and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation, staff are not following food safety protocols, revealed the following. LPA toured the kitchen with the Executive Chef. LPA observed the kitchen is clean and organized. LPA observed the refrigerator is kept at 37.0 degrees Fahrenheit and the freezer was at 0.0 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed a 2-day perishable and a 7-day non-perishable food supply on hand in the kitchen. The Executive Chef reported that food is delivered 3 times a week and fresh food is always used to prepare all meals. The Executive Chef reported that standard restaurant practices are used, and all food is prepared properly for the safety and enjoyment of the residents. LPA interviewed 4 kitchen staff. 4 out ofthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 21, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240507140146
Nov 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 20, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident's ceiling is in disrepair Resident's electricity is in disrepair

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Joseph Alejandre conducted an unannounced complaint visit to continue the investigation into the above allegations. LPA s were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPAs toured the facility and interviewed staff and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as facility emails. Regarding the allegations that resident's electricity is in disrepair and resident's ceiling is in disrepair, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) had a leak in the ceiling of the living room of the resident's apartment. Facility documentation indicated an ongoing issue with leaks with the initial leak in October 2021. A new leak occurred in December 2021 and facility documentation shows facility was taking steps to address the leak. Executive Director at time of complaint indicated an issue with water in light switches resultthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2024 · control 18-AS-20211215084528
Nov 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not ensuring that resident is adequately fed while in care

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Joseph Alejandre conducted an unannounced complaint visit to continue the investigation into the above allegations. LPA s were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPAs toured the facility and interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as meal tracking form. Regarding the allegation that facility staff are not ensuring that resident is adequately fed while in care, the investigation revealed the following: LPA reviewed meal tracking form during investigation which revealed the resident was on a meal plan. Meal plan indicates Resident 1 (R1) receives three meal trays per day. R1 did not go to the dining room and preferred to eat meals in the room. Two out of two staff indicate with encouragement the resident would come to the dining room. Staff state the resident was being provided meals. Staff indicate assistingthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2024 · control 18-AS-20230411105405
Nov 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not serving meals in a timely manner. Facility is overcooking the residents food. Facility serving food to residents that is not of quality. Facility does not ensure that an adequate amount of food is available to residents.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Joseph Alejandre and Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to continue the investigation into the allegations listed above. LPAs met with Executive Director Vicky Torres and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs interviewed the Executive Director and staff and residents. LPAs and the Executive Director toured the facility. The investigation into the allegation, facility is not serving meals in a timely manner revealed the following. LPA was at the facility and observed breakfast and lunch being served on November 19, 2024. It was alleged that residents wait up to an hour before being served. LPA observed 12 residents having breakfast. 6 residents interviewed during breakfast reported receiving their food within 10 minutes of ordering. 4 out of 4 staff interviewed reported residents in the dining room in assisted living receive their food within 5 to 15 minutes of ordering. LPA observed 31 residents having lunch. LPA observed that residents were sthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 19, 2024 · control 18-AS-20230621124927
Nov 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Personal Rights

On August 14, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived unannounced to initiate the investigation into the listed allegation pertaining to Personal Rights and met with Business Office Manager and explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility, along with Nina Guzman and requested and received copies of pertinent documents related to Resident #1(R1). LPA was informed that R1 does not reside at the listed facility but resides at the Independent Community (Manor). Due to Community Care Licensing not having jurisdiction over the listed facility this the allegation has been deemed "UNFOUNDED." Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations the allegation finding has been deemed "Unfounded." An allegation finding of "unfounded," means the allegation was without merit or is false and could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. There were No health and safety concerns observed during today's visit. An exit interviewthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 14, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240813130615
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations7typical 1
Substantiated complaints9typical 2
Total complaints17typical 7
State visits on file34typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202634020252212024715220233302021230
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (951) 687-2241

Is Citrus Place licensed?

Yes — Citrus Place is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Riverside (Riverside County): California license #331880924, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 140 residents. State records list 25 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 10, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Citrus Place care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Citrus Place with clearances for bedridden; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 140 NON-AMBULTORY OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN.

How much does Citrus Place cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Citrus Place's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Citrus Place accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Citrus Place is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

95 of 140 beds occupied (68%) when the state visited on April 2, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Citrus Place?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 34 state visits and 25 dated documents since 2021 for Citrus Place; 17 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 2, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

17 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not observe residents for change in condition
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez met with Connections for Living Director Megan Snell, and explained both the purpose of the visit and the details of the allegation. On January 24, 2025, Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint that facility staff do not observe residents for change in condition. It was alleged that R1 and R2 were experiencing cognitive decline and facility staff did not address their change in condition. According to Additional Witness 1 (AW1), both R1 and R2 were permitted to leave the community unsupervised when they should have been placed in a higher level of care. AW1 acknowledged reporting their concerns to management. Information from an interview with ED, stated that R1 and R2 resided in Independent Living and were not Assisted Living residents. A review of facility records, including resident rosters, dCDSS inspection report, April 2, 2026 · control 18-AS-20250124100551

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not give resident medication as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 3/4/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janette Romero made an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Vicky Torres who who was informed of the purpose of the visit. It was alleged staff mismanaged Resident 1's (R1's) medication resulting in their hospitalization. LPA toured the facility, conducted interviews, and obtained copies of pertinent records. LPA reviewed R1's admission agreement dated 11/6/23 and section 14 notes medication will be monitored as prescribed by the Resident's doctor. LPA reviewed R1's Physician's Report for Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly dated 11/17/23 noting R1 does not have the capacity to store or administer their own prescription medications. LPA reviewed R1's assessment dated 1/9/25 noting R1 requires total assistance with medications. Administrator Torres was interviewed and reported when residents return from the hospital, the facility faxes the updated physician orders to tCDSS inspection report, March 4, 2025 · control 18-AS-20250225135432

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not seek timely medical care for resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility and met with Connections for living Director, Megan Snell. The purpose of the visit was to inform of the complaint allegation findings regarding the listed allegation. During this investigation, LPA conducted interviews with Administration, staff, clients, and additional witnesses. LPA also obtained pertinent documentation in order to assist with determining the findings. On December 2, 2024, Community Care Licensing (CCL) received a complaint alleging that facility staff did not seek timely medical care for resident. It was reported that facility staff failed to transport Client 1 (C1) to the hospital for evaluation after an injury was observed. Additionally, it was stated the injury was acknowledged during the morning shift and the facility did not seek medical attention until the afternoon. Information obtained from interviews with Administrator stated facility staff observed swelling to CCDSS inspection report, December 12, 2024 · control 18-AS-20241202144300
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to refill resident's medication
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Joseph Alejandre conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPAs toured the facility and interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as medication administration record (MAR). Regarding the allegation that staff failed to refill resident's medication, the investigation revealed the following: Per MAR, Resident 1 (R1) did not receive Tamulosin HCL on 01/16-01/19/2022 and on 01/31/2022 pending delivery of the medication. Facility staff indicated R1's medications are serviced through the VA pharmacy and facilitated by the resident's family member. Witness indicates facility failed to provide adequate notice when refills were due. Facility documentation on 01/12/2022 shows that the family member had visited the facility and mediCDSS inspection report, December 3, 2024 · control 18-AS-20220204163100
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not providing adequate supervision to residents Staff left resident on the floor for an extended period of time Staff does not administer resident's medications as prescribed
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Joseph Alejandre conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPAs toured the facility and interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as incident reports. Regarding the allegations that staff are not providing adequate supervision to residents, staff does not administer resident's medications as prescribed and staff left resident on the floor for an extended period of time, the investigation revealed the following: Facility schedule indicates four caregivers and a med tech for 1st and 2nd shifts and two caregivers/ one med tech for the NOC shift. Nine out of nine staff state scheduling is adequate and staff are able to provide resident care including toileting, showering and assistance with eating. LPA observed residents beiCDSS inspection report, December 3, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240429160126
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was left in soiled diapers/clothing for an extended period of time. Resident was not treated with dignity and respect. Resident's toileting needs were not being met.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
LPAs Joseph Alejandre and Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPAs met with Executive Director Vicky Torres and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation, resident was left in soiled diapers/clothing for an extended period of time, revealed the following. W1 reported that on August 22, 2020, when they visited R1 they were wearing 2 diapers and they were soiled. LPA interviewed 2 staff who worked at the time R1 lived at the facility. Both staff reported that R1 was never put in 2 diapers and all residents were changed regularly. W1 reported that R1 was left soiled for long periods of time but did not provide any other dates when this took place. R1 could not be interviewed because they passed away in 2022. The former Executive Director reported that they were unaware of any residents that were left soiled for long periods of time. LPA interviewed 3 residents whoCDSS inspection report, December 3, 2024 · control 18-AS-20211020123858
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee is not ensuring that staff are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet residents' needs. Staff yell at residents in care. Staff are being discouraged from reporting incidents involving residents in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Joseph Alejandre conducted an unannounced complaint visit to continue the investigation into the above allegations. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPAs toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as facility schedule. Regarding the allegations that licensee is not ensuring that staff are sufficient in numbers, qualifications, and competency to meet residents' needs, staff yell at residents in care and staff are being discouraged from reporting incidents involving residents in care, the investigation revealed the following: Facility schedule indicates Memory Care runs four caregivers and a med tech for 1st and 2nd shift and two caregivers/ one med tech for NOC shift. Seven out of nine staff interviewed state facility staffing levels are good and resident needsCDSS inspection report, November 23, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240510123439
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent resident from pushing another resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Joseph Alejandre conducted an unannounced complaint visit to continue the investigation into the above allegation. LPAs were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation, the department toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as physician reports. Regarding the allegation that staff did not prevent resident from pushing another resident, the investigation revealed the following: On 04/13/2024, Resident 1 (R1) was being escorted back to the resident's room when R2 entered the room and became agitated. R2 pushed R1 and R1 fell and hit the head. R1 was transported to the hospital via 911 and returned with no new findings. Both residents are diagnosed with Dementia and denied the altercation occurred. Staff interviewed confirmed being present when the altercation occurred. Based on interviews conduCDSS inspection report, November 21, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240415154217
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following food safety protocols. Staff are falsifying medical documentation regarding residents in care. Staff are not reporting incidents involving residents in care. Staff are administering crushed medication(s) to resident(s) in care without physician(s)' permission. Staff are not reassessing residents as necessary.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Joseph Alejandre and Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings for the complaint investigation for the allegations listed above. LPAs met with Executive Director Vicky Torres and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation, staff are not following food safety protocols, revealed the following. LPA toured the kitchen with the Executive Chef. LPA observed the kitchen is clean and organized. LPA observed the refrigerator is kept at 37.0 degrees Fahrenheit and the freezer was at 0.0 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed a 2-day perishable and a 7-day non-perishable food supply on hand in the kitchen. The Executive Chef reported that food is delivered 3 times a week and fresh food is always used to prepare all meals. The Executive Chef reported that standard restaurant practices are used, and all food is prepared properly for the safety and enjoyment of the residents. LPA interviewed 4 kitchen staff. 4 out ofCDSS inspection report, November 21, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240507140146
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's ceiling is in disrepair Resident's electricity is in disrepair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Joseph Alejandre conducted an unannounced complaint visit to continue the investigation into the above allegations. LPA s were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPAs toured the facility and interviewed staff and witnesses as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as facility emails. Regarding the allegations that resident's electricity is in disrepair and resident's ceiling is in disrepair, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) had a leak in the ceiling of the living room of the resident's apartment. Facility documentation indicated an ongoing issue with leaks with the initial leak in October 2021. A new leak occurred in December 2021 and facility documentation shows facility was taking steps to address the leak. Executive Director at time of complaint indicated an issue with water in light switches resultCDSS inspection report, November 19, 2024 · control 18-AS-20211215084528
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not ensuring that resident is adequately fed while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Kimberly Lyman and Joseph Alejandre conducted an unannounced complaint visit to continue the investigation into the above allegations. LPA s were greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPAs toured the facility and interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as meal tracking form. Regarding the allegation that facility staff are not ensuring that resident is adequately fed while in care, the investigation revealed the following: LPA reviewed meal tracking form during investigation which revealed the resident was on a meal plan. Meal plan indicates Resident 1 (R1) receives three meal trays per day. R1 did not go to the dining room and preferred to eat meals in the room. Two out of two staff indicate with encouragement the resident would come to the dining room. Staff state the resident was being provided meals. Staff indicate assistingCDSS inspection report, November 19, 2024 · control 18-AS-20230411105405
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not serving meals in a timely manner. Facility is overcooking the residents food. Facility serving food to residents that is not of quality. Facility does not ensure that an adequate amount of food is available to residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Joseph Alejandre and Kimberly Lyman made an unannounced visit to continue the investigation into the allegations listed above. LPAs met with Executive Director Vicky Torres and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs interviewed the Executive Director and staff and residents. LPAs and the Executive Director toured the facility. The investigation into the allegation, facility is not serving meals in a timely manner revealed the following. LPA was at the facility and observed breakfast and lunch being served on November 19, 2024. It was alleged that residents wait up to an hour before being served. LPA observed 12 residents having breakfast. 6 residents interviewed during breakfast reported receiving their food within 10 minutes of ordering. 4 out of 4 staff interviewed reported residents in the dining room in assisted living receive their food within 5 to 15 minutes of ordering. LPA observed 31 residents having lunch. LPA observed that residents were sCDSS inspection report, November 19, 2024 · control 18-AS-20230621124927
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedPersonal Rights
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On August 14, 2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Venus Mixson arrived unannounced to initiate the investigation into the listed allegation pertaining to Personal Rights and met with Business Office Manager and explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA toured the facility, along with Nina Guzman and requested and received copies of pertinent documents related to Resident #1(R1). LPA was informed that R1 does not reside at the listed facility but resides at the Independent Community (Manor). Due to Community Care Licensing not having jurisdiction over the listed facility this the allegation has been deemed "UNFOUNDED." Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations the allegation finding has been deemed "Unfounded." An allegation finding of "unfounded," means the allegation was without merit or is false and could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. There were No health and safety concerns observed during today's visit. An exit interviewCDSS inspection report, August 14, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240813130615

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 34 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
9
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
17
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
34
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(951) 687-2241
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Citrus Place? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.