Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad)License #331800086 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareCalifornia Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad)License #331800086 · 3615 Crowell Ave, Riverside, CA · (626) 701-8960Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Riverside County/Riverside/California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad)
Map · 3615 Crowell Ave

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Starting rate$4,900/mo

Listed by the home on its own website · October 5, 2026 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (626) 701-8960

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • chadhome.org↗

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

CH

Call California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad)

Riverside · Licensed for 6

(626) 701-8960

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

From the home’s website, chadhome.org:

(626) 461-7425 · main line · seen October 5, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · Riverside

California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad)

3615 Crowell Ave, Riverside, CA 92504 · Licensed since 2017

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad)

Overview

Starting rate

$4,900 a month

Listed by the home on its own website · October 5, 2026 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: WheelchairState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Languages spoken: American Sign LanguageReported on Network of Care · September 9, 2026
  • Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents

Not on file: dementia, hospice and bedridden approvals.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
6 NON-AMBULATORY.

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

Care services

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Hiring checksCertification in medication administration and CPR required (for the housekeeping role) · Must type at least 25 words per minute (for the housekeeping role) · Attendance is required (for the housekeeping role) · Must be able to work nights, weekends, and holidays and back up emergency shifts (for the housekeeping role) · Provides positive leadership for all staff on shift (housekeeping role duty) · Must be able to handle and lift 50 lbs (for the housekeeping role) · and 10 more

    Certification in medication administration and CPR required · Must type at least 25 words per minute · Attendance is required · Must be able to work nights, weekends, and holidays and back up emergency shifts · Provides positive leadership for all staff on shift · Must be able to handle and lift 50 lbs · Must be able to handle pressure and multitask · Must have a high school degree or GED · Must pass fingerprint clearance and health screening · Must have a good transportation vehicle · Must be able to understand Deaf adults and seniors · Must be able to follow written and oral instructions · Six months to one year of work experience in a geriatric facility preferred · Certification in medication administration and CPR · Must pass finger-print clearance and Health Screening · Must have 6 months – 1 year work experience in a geriatric facility preferred. — reported on chadhome.org · source dated November 25, 2019.

As needs change

  • Medicines

    Who handles medications: Staff

    chadhome.org · October 4, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad): two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, staying through hospice and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

This home’s starting rate

$4,900a month to start

Listed by the home on its own website · October 5, 2026 · See the home’s page ↗

Costs & moving in

  • How care costs are added to the rentTiered levels

    Reported on chadhome.org · seen October 5, 2026.

  • Assessment before move-in

    Reported on Network of Care · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Physician's report required

    Reported on Network of Care · seen September 9, 2026.

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,900likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$4,900this home

    The home lists this starting rate on its own website for the monthly rate, seen October 5, 2026.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,900–$5,500
$4,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,900–$9,050
$7,400
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes10 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $5,500

$2,500$5,500

This homeA nearby home’s published starting rate

10 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $2,500–$4,850.

  • Joyful Hearts Senior CareRiverside · 1.5 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Villa AnneRiverside · 1.7 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Arlington Heights Assisted Living and Memory CareRiverside · 2.1 mi · Small home
    $2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Agape CottageRiverside · 2.1 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Park View Assisted LivingRiverside · 2.3 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Victoria Hills Assisted Living and Memory CareRiverside · 2.3 mi · Small home
    $2,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Agape Care HavenRiverside · 2.7 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Agape Care Home RiversideRiverside · 2.7 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Gold Living Home CareRiverside · 2.8 mi · Small home
    $3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • The Galleria View Villa IIRiverside · 2.8 mi · Small home
    $4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWhere this price comes from

The home lists this starting rate on its own website for the monthly rate, seen October 5, 2026.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Rooms, meals, activities and house rules, in the home’s own words. Open any detail to see where it came from.

Rooms & the spaces they will use (4)Private rooms · Laundry · Shared / companion rooms
  • Private rooms

    Reported on chadhome.org · seen October 5, 2026.

  • LaundryDone by staff

    Reported on chadhome.org · source dated October 4, 2026.

  • Shared / companion roomsReported no

    Reported on chadhome.org · seen October 5, 2026.

  • Housekeeping

    Reported on chadhome.org · source dated October 4, 2026.

Meals, preferences & familiar food (3)Meals provided per day · Snacks available · Meals provided
  • Meals provided per day3

    Reported on chadhome.org · source dated October 4, 2026.

  • Snacks available

    Reported on chadhome.org · source dated October 4, 2026.

  • Meals provided

    Reported on chadhome.org · source dated October 4, 2026.

Faith, culture & language (2)Religious observance supported · Languages spoken by caregivers
  • Religious observance supportedAttend church

    Reported on chadhome.org · source dated October 4, 2026.

  • Languages spoken by caregiversAmerican Sign Language

    Reported on Network of Care · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence (2)Visiting hours · Visiting hours
  • Visiting hoursPosted hours

    Reported on chadhome.org · source dated October 4, 2026.

  • Visiting hours9:00 am to 11:00 am and 1:00 pm to 4:30 pm, Monday through Saturday and Sunday 1:00 pm to 4:00 pm

    Reported on chadhome.org · source dated October 4, 2026.

Visiting & staying involved (4)Transport to medical appointments · Office or phone hours as published · Transportation costs extra
  • Transport to medical appointments

    Reported on chadhome.org · source dated October 4, 2026.

  • Office or phone hours as publishedVisiting hours: Mon-Sat 9am-11am and 1pm-4:30pm; Sun 1pm-4pm

    Reported on Network of Care · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Transportation costs extra

    Reported on chadhome.org · source dated October 4, 2026.

  • Contact form

    Reported on chadhome.org · seen October 5, 2026.

    Open on the website ↗
About the home (1)Brand or trade name
  • Brand or trade nameCrowell House

    Reported on chadhome.org · source dated October 4, 2026.

Where it is

3615 Crowell Ave, Riverside, CA 92504Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Doctors Hospital of RiversideHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.2 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #331800086 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 11 of 23 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 3 “Unsubstantiated”.

20262 state visits · 3 documents

Mar 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff physically abused resident resulting in fracture.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez, conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings for a complaint investigation regarding the above allegation. LPA Perez met with Caregiver, Carl Denney and explained both the purpose of the visit and the details of the allegation. On October 30, 2025, the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a complaint alleging facility staff physically abused resident resulting in fracture. It was reported that on October 26, 2025, Resident 1 (R1) was transported to the hospital for back pain resulted by a physical assault caused by S1. Information obtained from an Interview with Administrator Danny Barrett denied any physical abuse and reported he was not at the facility on October 25 or 26, 2025. Interview with Staff 2 (S2) revealed that on October 25, 2025, S2 observed R1 lose their footing and assisted R1 before R1 fell to the floor. S2 noted they did not observe a change of condition or was advised of any issues or concerns by R1. Continued on LIC 9099-C. Unsubstantiated Interview with Staff 3 (S3) revealed that on October 26, 2025, they observed R1 acknowledging pain and subsequently contacted for medical assistance. Additional information could not be obtained by R1 due to their passing. S3 denied any observation of physical abuse. Attempts were made to interview Additional Witness 2 (AW2) for additional information regarding the allegation above. AW2 did not respond to interview requests and therefore no additional details were obtained. A review of medical records from Kaiser Permanente hospital, dated October 26, 2025, shows that at approximately 7:50 AM, R1 did not appear to be in any pain or distress. It was also stated that R1’s care plan was created and ordered the use of a brace for assistance. A review of Special Incident Reports submitted by the facility to the Community Care Licensing Division revealed that no records were available regarding R1’s fall or any related hospitalization. Based on interviews, record reviews, and observations the allegations facility staff physically abused resident resulting in fracture has been deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted. A copy of this report was provided to Caregiver, Carl Denney.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2026 · control 18-AS-20251030144849
Mar 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez conducted a case management visit to the facility for the purpose of issuing deficiencies related to complaint investigation 18-AS-20251030144849. LPA Perez met with Caregiver Carl Denney, and explained the purpose of the visit and assisted LPA. During the investigation, information obtained revealed that Resident 1 (R1) had a hospital visit for a UTI on 10/19/25, experienced a fall on 10/25/25, and had a second hospital visit on 10/26/25 due to pain concerns. LPA conducted a review of Special Incident Reports submitted by facility staff and did not find any documentation referencing incidents listed above. Interview with Administrator, Danny Barrett, acknowledged the incidents with R1 occurred and could not provide Special Incident Reports submitted to Community Care Licensing Division upon request. As a result, a deficiency is being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, 809-D and Appeal Rights was discussed with and provided to facility representative.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 877211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 17, 2026

877211(a)(1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence… This report shall include the resident's name, age, sex and date of admission; ... This report shall include the resident's name, age, sex and date of admission; date and nature of event; attending physician's name, findings, and treatment, if any… case. This requirement was not met as evidenced by:the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 24, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator will provide in house training focusing on regulation 87211 with all staff and provide a written procedure that facility staff will begin to follow by POC date. Procedure must include submitting reports to LTCO and CCLD. Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly submit incidents under requirements on three separate occasions for R1 with two hospital visits and fall incident. This poses a potential health safety or personal rights risk to residents in care.

Jan 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez and made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting a required annual inspection. LPA was assisted by American Sign Language Interpreter Christine Bartley Williams. The LPA was granted entry by staff to conduct the inspection and met with Administrator, Danny Barrett. The LPA informed the Administrator of the purpose for the visit. The inspection included the following: LPA toured the facility inside and outside. LPA observed the facility to be clean and in good repair. The facility consists of a kitchen and dinning area, a living room area, a garage and laundry room, and a patio and yard with sufficient seating and space for activities. There are grab bars for each toilet, bathtub and shower used by residents. Resident showers have non-skid mats present. The home is maintained at a comfortable temperature for the clients. Lighting is sufficient for safety and comfort. Water temperature measured within regulation. Laundry facilities and a locked cabinet is present for storing laundry soap and other chemicals. All outdoor and indoor passageways are free of obstruction. Emergency lighting is available. There is a telephone working at this location. There are no firearms at this home and no bodies of water observed. LPA began review of client records. Four (4) records were reviewed. LPA reviewed for identification and emergency information, admission agreement, medical assessment, and TB test results, needs and service plans, placement, functional assessment, centrally stored medication/destruction records, safeguard for personal property/valuables, and personal rights notification. LPA observed 4 of 4 Admissions agreement to be missing. A deficiency will be issued. Continued on LIC 809-C. LPA began review of employee records- Four (4) records were reviewed. LPA reviewed employee records for first aid certification, criminal record clearance or an exemption, health screening and TB test results, employee rights, training verification, and administrator certification. LPA observed Administrator did not have a file on record. A deficiency will be issued. LPA observed facility kitchen had the ability to prepare food in clean environment and possessed equipment in good working condition. Food supply meets the requirement of one (1) week supply of nonperishable and two (2) day supply of perishables. Emergency food and water supply is present. There is a locked location for chemicals and sharps in the kitchen. Medications are centrally stored. There is a locked cabinet in the kitchen allocated for medication storage. Centrally stored medication and destruction logs are maintained. Medications reviewed appear to have been dispensed accurately. LPA made observation throughout the inspection process to assess if the facility remains in conformity with the State Fire Marshall regulations. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and found to be operational. Fire extinguishers were serviced on 09/13/2025. LPA observed Emergency drills records were not obtained. A deficiency will be cited. Based on the information received during this visit today in the areas reviewed, there are three deficiencies that are being cited per Title 22, Division 6 of The California Code of Regulations. This LIC 809, LIC 809-D and Appeal Rights was reviewed with the facility representative, and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 21, 2026

20254 state visits · 4 documents

Oct 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

On 10/13/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Armando Perez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of issuing citations for deficiencies observed during the investigation into Complaint Control No. 18-AS-20251030144849. LPA met with Administrator Danny Barrett and explained the purpose of LPA's visit. During facility records review, LPA observed the facility had incomplete resident files. This is a repeat deficiency within a 12 month period. A civil penalty will be assessed. Based on record review and interviews, deficiencies are being cited per Title 22 Division 6 of the California Code of Regulations. See LIC809-D, LIC 421FC. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeal rights was discussed with and provided to Administrator Danny Barrett.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87506(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 14, 2025

(a) The licensee shall ensure that a separate, complete, and current record is maintained for each resident in the facility or in a central administrative location readily available to facility staff and to licensing agency staff. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above in 3 out of 5 resident files requested which poses/posed a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 31, 2025

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed he will be printing and delivering the required documents to the Riverside RO in person. A list was provided of the documents requested.

Jul 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Armando Perez made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a case management visit to verify corrections have been made to clear the deficiencies from the annual inspection commenced on January 28, 2025. LPA identified himself and was granted entry into the facility by staff. LPA met with Administrator Danny Barrett, and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA began review of client records. Five (5) records were reviewed. LPA reviewed for identification and emergency information, admission agreement, medical assessment, and TB test results, needs and service plans, placement, functional assessment, centrally stored medication/destruction records, safeguard for personal property/valuables, and personal rights notification. LPA observed client records to be available and complete. LPA began review of employee records. LPA reviewed employee records for first aid certification, criminal record clearance or an exemption, health screening and TB test results, employee rights, training verification. LPA observed personnel records to be available and complete. Deficiencies will be cleared and annual inspection is complete. This LIC 809 report was reviewed with the facility representative, and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 11, 2025
Feb 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Armando Perez made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct a case management-annual continuation visit to complete an annual inspection commenced on January 28, 2025. LPA identified himself and was granted entry into the facility by staff. LPA met with Administrator Danny Barrett, and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA referred Administrator to Technical Assistance and Administrator met with Analyst Michael Reber on Thursday February 13, 2025 for assistance with record files. LPA's continuation visit consisted of a tour of the facility, and a review of both resident and staff records. LPA observed files to be incomplete. Administrator stated that he will need more time citing that he was working on getting his staff to sign documents and he just had the consultation meeting with Michael the week prior. LPA communicated with Administrator the LIC forms needed to complete the staff and resident files and will have them ready by February 28, 2025. Based on the information received during this visit today in the areas reviewed, there are no deficiencies that are being cited per Title 22, Division 6 of The California Code of Regulations. This LIC 809 report was reviewed with the facility representative, and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2025
Jan 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Armando Perez made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of conducting a required annual inspection. For todays visit, LPA was assisted by ASL interpreter Kathy Goodson The LPA was granted entry by staff to conduct the inspection. The administrator Danny Barrett communicated with LPA by text message informing LPA that he is ill with Covid-19 and authorized caregiver Barbie Smith-Enos to assist with the visit. The LPA informed the staff of the purpose for the visit. The inspection included the following: LPA toured the facility inside and outside. LPA observed the facility to be clean and in good repair. The facility consists of six (6) resident bedrooms, four (4) bathrooms, a kitchen and dinning area, a living room area, a garage and laundry room, and a patio and yard with sufficient seating and space for activities. There are grab bars for each toilet, bathtub and shower used by residents. Resident showers have non-skid mats present. The home is maintained at a comfortable temperature for the clients. Lighting is sufficient for safety and comfort. Water temperature measured within regulation. Laundry facilities and a locked cabinet is present for storing laundry soap and other chemicals. All outdoor and indoor passageways are free of obstruction. Emergency lighting is available. There is a telephone working at this location. There are no firearms at this home and no bodies of water observed. LPA began review of client records. Five (5) records were reviewed. LPA reviewed for identification and emergency information, admission agreement, medical assessment, and TB test results, needs and service plans, placement, functional assessment, centrally stored medication/destruction records, safeguard for personal property/valuables, and personal rights notification. LPA observed client records to be incomplete.A deficiency was issued. LPA could not review employee records- Seven (7) records were unavailable at the time of the visit. LPA will need to schedule an annual continuation and review for employee records for first aid certification, criminal record clearance or an exemption, health screening and TB test results, employee rights, training verification, and current administrator certification. A deficiency was cited. LPA observed facility kitchen had the ability to prepare food in clean environment and possessed equipment in good working condition. Food supply meets the requirement of one (1) week supply of nonperishable and two (2) day supply of perishables. Emergency food and water supply is present. Medications are centrally stored. There is a locked cabinet is allocated for medication storage in the kitchen. Centrally stored medication and destruction logs are maintained. Medications reviewed appear to have been dispensed accurately. LPA made observation throughout the inspection process to assess if the facility remains in conformity with the State Fire Marshall regulations. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and found to be operational. Fire extinguishers was last serviced on, 05/02/2024. Fire drills are conducted quarterly. Based on the information received during this visit today in the areas reviewed, there are deficiencies that are being cited per Title 22, Division 6 of The California Code of Regulations. A plan of correction was provided and a continuation annual visit will be needed to clear two deficiencies. This LIC 809 report was reviewed with the facility representative Barbie Smith and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 28, 2025

20243 state visits · 4 documents

Nov 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff member refused t give a resident their medication.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez visited the facility to further investigate into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA arrived at facility and was greeted at the door by Barbara Smith-enos, caregiver and granted entry and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included a tour of the physical plant of the facility, records review, interviews with the following: 5 out of 5 residents, and staff. It is alleged staff member refused to give a resident their medication. LPA Martinez observed and reviewed medication that is locked in the kitchen cabinet and observed medication to be accurate for all five residents. Records collected by LPA Torres on visit conducted on March 10, 2022, revealed for resident Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated (R1) Tylenol is a PRN medication. MAR sheets for February, March 2022 reflect that R1’s PRN medication for Tylenol was given and listed under the PRN medication list. Interview with staff indicated that R1 is able to ask for medication when needed and it is given without a problem or has never had a problem giving the medication to R1. Interview with 5 of 5 residents indicated that they have never experienced an issue with medication, staff give them their medication and they are able to request it when needed and staff will assist them to obtain the medication. Indicated that they have never had an issue in the past or now with getting their medication or pain medication either. They always get it when they request it and have not had an issues to report. Based on the information mentioned above, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegation occurred as reported. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with facility representative and a copy of this LIC9099 report was left at facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2024 · control 18-AS-20220301090049
Nov 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful Eviction Staff do not prevent resident from harming other resident(s) while in care Food services are inadequate Staff handle resident in a rough manner Staff force resident to take medication causing injury Staff threaten resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez visited the facility to further investigate into the above identified complaint allegations. LPA arrived at facility and was greeted at the door by Barbara Smith-enos, caregiver and granted entry and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included a tour of the physical plant of the facility, records review, interviews with the following: 5 out of 5 residents, and 3 of 3 staff. It is alleged a wrongful eviction was given. Based on record review for LIC624 unusual incident report received for resident (R1) for April 06, 2024, indicate the following: 4/3/24 client hurt caregiver with a hand jab(s) on the neck. 3 day eviction notice given, 4/4/24 client asked for scissors, refused to say why. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiated Said things that staff interprets as intent to harm house, staff, residents. 4/5/24 APS notified about self-neglect. CCA came to try help resolve. Client refused APS shelter resources list. 4/6/24, POA alerted Administrator about client’s possession of poison or intent to possess poison. Police notified client left facility and is missing. 4/6/24 client found at Riverside community hospital; police seen bringing clients medication administration record. 72 hours hold at hospital. Interview with Administrator indicated that a verbal and written 3 day eviction was given to resident on April 03, 2024. Resident went out to the hospital on April 6, 2024, after they walked out of the facility and police went to the facility on the that evening and retrieved residents’ medication and insurance, resident did not return to the facility. It is alleged that staff do not prevent resident from harming other resident’s while in care. Interview with 2 of 5 residents, revealed that they have never witnessed any resident hitting or harming another residents. It was indicated that there is a resident that gets angry at times but does not hit anyone or harm them. Interview with Administrator indicated that there is a resident at the facility that that has moment of hot headiness that can last 20-30 seconds, however they have never aggressively physically touched any of the other residents. There is always staff on site and residents are supervised at all times. There as never been any reports from other resident or staff that they had been physically harmed by any resident. It is alleged that food service is inadequate. LPA Martinez conducted a physical tour of the facility on today’s visit and observations revealed that facility has two refrigerators and a large pantry. It was observed that there were sufficient amount of quality and quantity of perishable and nonperishable food for residents. LPA observed the facility has a weekly menu posted in the kitchen and observed the food service to be well balanced with a variety of choices. LPA conducted interviews with staff and it was indicated that the facility does grocery days twice a week. Interview with residents revealed that they have never had an issue with food, snacks are always available and that they can request food out of the meals times and staff will get them food or prepare it for them. It is alleged that staff handle residents in a rough manner. Interview with resident revealed that they have never been touched or spoken to in a rough aggressive manner. Resident also indicated that they have never witnessed any of the staff speak or handle any resident in a rough manner. Interview with Administrator Continued on LIC9099-C revealed that the only incident that they have been aware of it a staff entered a resident room for medication management and to get residents (R1) attention they tapped R1 in the knee as to R1 told staff not to touch them. Saff indicated that they have never witnessed another staff member handle a resident roughly at any moment. It is alleged staff forced resident to take medication causing injury. Review of records obtained by LPA Sara Martinez on visit conducted on April 12, 2024, MAR sheet for April 2024 reflect that on various occasion R1 refused to take medication for diabetes management. Notes reflect that staff offered to R1 to take medication and all times it was refused. Interview with resident revealed that staff has never forced them to take medication or has caused an injury to them will doing medication management. Staff always helps and gives them their medication and they never had an issue. Interview with staff indicated that they don’t force resident to take medication and if they refuse that they try to get them to take medication but not force them to. Interview with Administrator revealed that staff are aware that resident’s have the right to refuse medication. When resident refuse medication staff will mark medication refusal on MAR. It is alleged that staff threaten resident in care. Interview with staff revealed that they do not threaten any resident with evicting them since they can’t do that and that they have never witnessed the Administrator to threaten anyone with that either. Interview with Administrator indicated that a verbal and written 3 day eviction was given to resident on April 03, 2024. Interview with resident indicated that they have never been asked to leave, threatened, or given an eviction notice. They indicated that they have not seen any staff do that to them or anyone in the facility. Based on record review for LIC624 unusual incident report received for resident (R1) for April 06, 2024, indicate the following: 4/3/24 client hurt caregiver with a hand jab(s) on the neck. 3 day eviction notice given, 4/4/24 client asked for scissors, refused to say why. Said things that staff interprets as intent to harm house, staff, residents. 4/5/24 APS notified about self-neglect. CCA came to try help resolve. Client refused APS shelter resources list. 4/6/24, POA alerted Administrator about client’s possession of poison or intent to possess poison. Police notified client left facility and is missing. 4/6/24 client found at Riverside community hospital; police seen bringing clients medication administration record. 72 hours hold at hospital. Continued on LIC9099-C Based on the information mentioned above, the Department is unable to ascertain if the allegations occurred as reported. Although the allegations may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove or refute the alleged violation occurred; therefore, this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated. An exit interview was conducted with facility representative and a copy of this LIC9099 report was left at facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240404133620
Apr 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not properly trained Facility staff are restraining resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation and deliver findings for the allegations listed above. LPA was granted entry and met with Licensee Danny Barret and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff are not properly trained” it was alleged that Staff One (S1) was working at the facility without completing their training. LPA conducted interviews and record review regarding the allegation. Interviews with Administrator Barret on 09/10/2020 revealed that two of the staff members had not completed the 20 and 40 hours of training for the year per Health and Safety Code 1569.625 and 1569.69. Administrator Barret’s interview revealed S1 had not yet completed the required training for the year. Therefore, based on interviews and record review the allegation facility staff are not properly trained has been deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Substantiated LPA toured the facility on 12/11/2023 and did not see any mattress pads on the floor in the residents’ room. LPA conducted interviews with staff and residents with an interpreter present that did not provide any corroborating evidence that support resident was left on the floor for an extended period of time with no explanation from staff. Therefore, based on interviews, record review, and observation, the allegation “Resident was left on the floor for an extended period of time” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff are mismanaging resident's medication” LPA conducted record review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for three (3) residents and found no discrepancies with the MAR and mediation count. Record review of the MAR and LPA’s observation of the medication reveal staff were administrating resident’s medication per the physicians’ orders. Record review and interviews with staff and residents reveal medication was being managed by staff and the residents were receiving their prescribed medication daily. Therefore based on interviews, record review, and observation, the allegation “Facility staff are mismanaging resident's medication” is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. A finding that the complaint is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was reviewed with and provided to Licensee Danny Barret. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff are restraining residents” it was alleged Resident One (R1) had been restrained on their bed with two pillows placed by R1’s side to prevent R1 from moving. Interviews with Administrator Barrett revealed the facility puts two pillows on R1’s right side to keep R1 from rolling out of bed onto the floor. Record review revealed R1 has a history of falls per R1’s physicians report. However, there was no written care plan from a medical professional in place for R1 to have postural supports. Therefore, based on interviews and record review the allegation facility staff are restraining residents has been deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation(s) is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report, 9099C, 9099D, LIC 811, and appeal rights were provided to Licensee Danny Barret.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2024 · control 18-AS-20200904122837

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(c) · Plan of correction due date: May 10, 2024

87411 Personnel Requirements - General (c) All RCFE staff who assist residents with personal activities of daily living shall receive initial and annual training as specified in Health and Safety Code sections 1569.625 and 1569.69 This requirement is not met as evidence by: based on interview and record review the licensee did not comply by having S1 assist residents with personal activities of daily living without fulfilling the annual required hours of training which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee will ensure all staff are have completed the initial and annual training as specified in Health and Safety Code 1569.625 and 1569.69. Licensee will submit proof of staff training to LPA by the agreed Plan of Correction date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87608(a)(3) · Plan of correction due date: May 10, 2024

87608 Postural Supports (a) Based on the individual's... appraisal, the facility shall provide assistance and care… Postural supports may be used under the following conditions. (3) A written order from a physician indicating the need for the postural support.This requirement is not met as evidence by: Based on interviews and record review, the Licensee did not ensure R1 had a written order from Physician for pillows to be placed on the side of R1 while laying in bed to ensure R1 did not fall off. R1 is no longer a resident. This poses a poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to send LPA a written and signed statement stating Licensee and staff read and understood regulation 87608 regarding Postural Supports. Licensee will submit statement to LPA by Plan of Correction date.

Jan 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola and conducted a required annual visit. LPA was greeted and was granted entry and met with Staff, Joseph Valdez and spoke with Administrator Daniel Barrett over the phone who was informed of the purpose of the visit. LPA was accompanied by a Community Care Licensing approved American Sign Language interpreter to assist LPA's communications with facility staff and residents. At the time of visit there were (4) clients and (2) staff present. The facility is a one story home with (6) bedrooms and (4) bathrooms. The facility does not have a pool or fire arms. The facility is a residential care facility for the elderly serving elderly ages 60 and above. LPA observed the following: Infection Control: LPA observed hand hygiene supplies, PPE equipment and cleaning supplies to do regular cleaning of the facility. The facility has a infection control plan on file. Physical Plant: Physical plant, floors, windows, and doors were observed to be clean and fixtures and furniture were present and in good repair. The facility's outdoor area was observed to be free of hazards. Laundry equipment was observed to be in good working condition. The carbon monoxide detector was tested and operational during the visit. LPA observed beeping noise and error code coming from the fire panel in the home. The administrator informed the LPA that this was recently installed in the facility. Technical note was issued for facility staff to have this inspected. Food Service: LPA observed facility kitchen had the ability to prepare food in clean environment and possessed equipment in good working condition. LPA observed the facility met the required food items. Record Review and Resident/Staff Files: LPA reviewed staff files and training. LPA found that (2) staff did not have a documented physical exam on file. deficiency was cited and plan of correction was documented with administrator. (1) staff was found to not have current annual 20 hour training, LPA documented technical note and documented date when the staff would conduct the training. Client files were reviewed and possessed all required paperwork. Health Related Services/ Incidental Medical Services: All client medication was locked in a kitchen cabinet. LPA reviewed client medications and found that MARS and medication was accounted for and had required labeling. Disaster preparedness: LPA reviewed the facility's emergency and disaster plan. Technical note was documented for staff to update to new LIC610D. Administrator was unable to provide documentation on most recent drill. deficiency was cited and plan of correction was created with administrator. The documentation did not meet the department standards and technical note was documented. An exit interview was conducted with staff, Joseph Valdez where this report and deficiency pages and appeal rights were reviewed and provided to them.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 29, 2024

The state marks this report as 6 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 12 documents

20233 state visits · 4 documents

Sep 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff speaks inappropriately towards client while in care Staff retaliated against client while in care

On 9/27/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate the above allegations. LPA was accompanied by a Community Care Licensing approved ASL interpreter to assist LPA's communications with facility staff and residents. LPA met with Licensee, Danny Barrett, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews, documented observations, and conducted records reviews. It was alleged that "Staff speaks inappropriately towards client while in care". Allegedly Staff#1 (S1) had yelled at Resident #1(R1). LPA interviewed staff who denied the allegation. LPA interviewed resident who stated they would not recall the incident. Therefore, the allegation was unsubstantited. Unsubstantiated Regarding allegation "Staff retaliated against client while in care", it was alleged that S1 had interfered with R1's sleeping schedule as retaliation for issuing a complaint with Community Care Licensing. LPA interview staff who denied the allegation. LPA interviewed resident who stated they could not recall the incident occurring. Therefore this allegation is also unsubstantiated. Findings that are unsubstantiated mean that although the allegation is valid, the preponderance of the evidence standard has not been met. An exit interview was conducted with Licensee, Danny Barrett, where this report and licensee rights were reviewed and provided to them.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200316140401
Jul 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not have proper training

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA was accompanied by a Community Care Licensing approved ASL interpreter to assist LPA's communications with facility staff and residents. LPA met with Administratior (AD) Danny Barrett and explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA interviewed one (1) resident, one (1) staff and requested pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation "Staff do not have proper training", it was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) had not been properly trained to provide assistance to Resident #1 (R1) for their medical condition. Interview with AD indicated all staff had been trained but when LPA requested 2020 training records for S1 they were unable to be located. S1 is no longer employed at the facility and could not be interviewed. Based on interviews conducted and a lack of records to be reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be substantiated. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8), are being cited on the attached LIC 9099 D. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided along with LIC811- Confidential Names list and Appeal Rights. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 27, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200225092314

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(d)(3) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 11, 2023

Personnel Requirements- General, (d) All personnel shall be given on the job training or have related experience in the job assigned to them. This...shall provide knowledge of ...(3)Skill and knowledge required to provide necessary resident care...to...residents. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: The Licensee did not ensure all staff were trained to provide necessary care for residents. Based on interviews and records reviewed, there is no evidence that S1 was trained to provide R1 with assistance with their medical condition. This poses a potential health, safety, and personal rightsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 27, 2023

Plan of correction: The Licensee will ensure all staff are provided training by a licensed medical professional to properly care for R1's medical condition. Proof of such training will be submitted to CCL by the POC due date 8/11/2023. (continued from left) risk to residents in care.

Apr 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner for a resident.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas visited the facility unannounced to deliver the finding on the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Danny Barrett and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file reviews and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation alleged that on January 2, 2020, or January 2, 2021, from 1:30 p.m. to 9:40 p.m., resident #1 (R1) had several seizures, and the facility did not contact 911. LPA Nickolas’ interview with the facility's administrator revealed that R1 sometimes has seizures, and the doctor adjusted their medication. The administrator stated that the facility must call emergency services if R1’s seizures last longer than five (5) minutes. The finding is Unsubstantiated. There is no evidence or witnesses to corroborate the allegation. A finding of Unsubstantiated means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted and copy of this report was provided. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2023 · control 18-AS-20210127091959
Apr 13, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to treat resident with dignity and respect. Staff mismanaged resident's medication. Staff failed to provide a comfortable and safe environment for the resident. Staff failed to provide resident with privacy.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas visited the facility unannounced to deliver the finding on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Danny Barrett and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file reviews and interviews with relevant parties. Allegation #1: “Staff failed to treat resident with dignity and respect”. The allegation alleged that staff #1 (S1) has been picking on resident # 1 (R1) for the last three (3) months by making inappropriate comments and spreading rumors about R1 to the other facility staff members. LPA Nickolas' interview with the facility's administrator revealed that the administrator denies that facility staff members failed to treat R1 with dignity and respect. LPA Nickolas' interviews with residents revealed that no residents witnessed or admitted to the staff's failure to treat residents with dignity and respect. The finding is Unsubstantiated. There is no evidence or witnesses to corroborate the allegation. Unsubstantiated Allegation #2 “Staff mismanaged resident's medication”. The allegation alleged that three (3) times, S1 administered the old medication to R1, not the new medication. LPA Nickolas' interview with the facility's administrator revealed that the administrator checks to see if the medication is expired. LPA Nickolas' interviews with residents revealed that no residents witnessed or admitted to staff mismanaging their medication. The finding is Unsubstantiated. There is no evidence or witnesses to corroborate the allegation. Allegation #3 “Staff failed to provide a comfortable and safe environment for the resident”. The allegation alleged that R1 does not feel comfortable or safe when S1 is around. LPA Nickolas’ interviews with residents revealed that no residents witnessed or admitted to staff failing to provide a comfortable and safe environment for the residents. There is no evidence or witnesses to corroborate the allegation. Allegation #4 “Staff failed to provide resident with privacy”. Allegation alleged that S1 does not give R1 any privacy in their room. LPA Nickolas’ interviews with residents revealed that no residents witnessed or admitted to staff failing to provide residents with privacy. A finding of Unsubstantiated means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. An exit interview was conducted and copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 13, 2023 · control 18-AS-20210125111316

20224 state visits · 4 documents

Jul 1, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency pages: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Jesse Gardner, conducted an unannounced visit in reference to the facility being previously identified to be over capacity. LPA met with Caregiver, and informed her of the purpose of her visit. LPA then toured the facility, and found 6 residents in care. Thus the facility was deemed to be in compliance with the capacity. Upon the tour of the facility, LPA learned of Resident R1 passing away recently. It was proposed that through interview with Licensee Danny Barrett via phone, that resident R1's daughter took resident to the hospital on 5/25/2022 and R1 passed away. LPA reviewed Department records, and found that the facility did not report the death to CCL, and thus a deficiency was cited. An exit interview was conducted where a copy of this report was discussed with a provided to Ms. Andrade.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 15, 2022

REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing..reports..(1)..report shall be submitted..This requirement was not being met as evidenced by: Based on LPA's review of Department records revealed that the Licensee did not submit a death report for R1. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee states that a death report will be submitted by POC date. Licensee to further submit a memorandum of understanding via email to LPA by POC date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87506(d) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 15, 2022

RESIDENT RECORDS: (d)..All resident records shall be available to the licensing..This requirement was not being met as evidenced by: Based on LPA's review, staff could not provide resident records for R1, thus the Licensee did not comply with regulation. This poses a potential health and safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 1, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee states that records will be provided to Licensing staff in the future, and will provide a memorandum of understanding to LPA via email by POC date.

May 16, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Stephanie Torres, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to amend a Facility Evaluation Report (LIC 809) issued on April 29, 2022. The LPA met with Administrator, Danny Barrett, and informed him of the purpose of her visit. This report was reviewed with Barrett and a copy was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2022
Apr 29, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Stephanie Torres, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to continue the investigation into the following complaint: 18-AS-20220301090049. The LPA met with Administrator, Danny Barrett, and informed him of the purpose of her visit. During the visit the LPA was made aware of a concern regarding the facility's capacity. Per Barrett, the facility accepted a seventh client into the home approximately one week ago. The facility only has a capacity for six residents. The facility is not in compliance with their approved fire clearance. A citation and civil penalty will be issued. This report was reviewed with Barrett and a copy was provided along with appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87203 · Plan of correction due date: May 17, 2022

Fire Safety: All facilities shall be maintained in conformity with the regulations adopted by the State Fire Marshal for the protection of life and property against fire and panic. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview, the licensee did not ensure the facility was maintained in conformity with the state fire marshall. Per Barrett, the facility accepted a 7th client into the home approximately 1 week ago. The facility only has a capacity for 6 residents. The facility is not in compliance with their approved fire clearance. This poses a potential threat to the safety of the residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2022

Plan of correction: The Administrator stated an eviction letter will be submitted to R1 within 24 hours and will submit a copy of the letter to the Regional Office by the close of buisness day of 05/17/2022.

Feb 1, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Stephanie Torres, made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an annual inspection, with an emphasis on infection control. The LPA arrived at approximately 9:00 AM, signed in and utilized hand sanitizer. The LPA met with Administrator, Danny Barrett, and informed him of the purpose of the visit. There are currently no cases of COVID-19 within the facility. During today's visit, the LPA toured the facility and made observations pertaining to the facility's infection control measures. The LPA observed sufficient hand hygiene supplies and sufficient cleaning and disinfecting provisions. The facility has a designated infection control lead person who has been tasked with tracking all COVID-19 cases and/or suspected cases, ensuring PPE supplies are maintained, cleaning and disinfection provisions are in adequate quantities, and that staff are trained in the proper use and disposal of PPE and overall infection control. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 6 of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Barrett and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 1, 2022

20213 state visits · 4 documents

Nov 29, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility grounds is in disrepair Staff is mishandling clients medication while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Crystal Colvin arrived at the facility unannounced for the purpose of continuing investigation of a complaint with the above allegation(s). LPA Colvin met with Administrator Danney Barrett, and informed him of the purpose of today's visit. Below is a summary of the findings of the investigation: Regarding allegation "Facility grounds is in disrepair": LPA Colvin observed numerous cracks in the concrete driveway, some of which caused the ground to be unlevel. LPA Colvin placed her writing pen next to the crack and measured the difference between the height difference of both sides of the crack to be approximately one inch. This is a safety hazard for residents, especially the non-ambulatory residents that this facility is licensed to retain, as they require mobility devices to assist with their movement. LPA Colvin additionally observed a hole in-between the brick walkway in the backyard, which leads to the Administrative office. While this hole was marked by a step ladder and a hazard cone, Administrator Danny informed LPA Colvin that it has been that way for approximately one month due to an ongoing investigation into the sprinklers and pipes. Substantiated Therefore, based on observations and interview, the allegation "Facility grounds is in disrepair" is SUBSTANTIATED. Regarding allegation "Staff is mishandling clients medication while in care": LPA Colvin interviewed Administrator Danny Barrett and reviewed physical medication bottles and records from past resident (R1). LPA Colvin observed that while the facility's records for R1's medication Carvedilol stated that the staff were to administer 6.25 mg tablets broken into halves twice daily, the bottle for R1's medication was labeled as being 3.125 mg tablets, which were to be taken twice daily. Therefore, if the staff were cutting the 3.125 mg tablets, as instructed on the facility's medication records, then R1 was only getting half the prescribed dose of medication. Therefore, based on record review, the allegation "Staff is mishandling clients medication while in care" is SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is SUBSTANTIATED means that the allegation(s) is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Danny Barrett, and a copy of this report, LIC9099D, and appeal rights was provided. Regarding the allegation "Staff is not properly maintaining the facility": This allegation was specifically in relation to the facility's kitchen stove, which LPA Colvin did not observe any concerns with during the investigation. LPA Colvin additionally interviewed Administrator Danny Barrett regarding if there had been any issues with the stove, and Danny reported to LPA Colvin that they had one which was not working, so the landlord replaced it with a new one. Administrator Danny was able to show LPA Colvin on his computer and email exchange between himself and the landlord of the property in February of 2020, wherein the landlord states that they will come take a look at the problem. No further evidence was provided to LPA Colvin regarding this allegation. Therefore, based on observations, interviews, and record review, the allegation "Staff is not properly maintaining the facility" is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Danny Barrett. Regarding allegation "Staff is denying CCL representatives from inspecting the facility": LPA Colvin toured the facility, specifically focusing on where medications were stored, as well as what was stored in the Administrative office in the backyard. This allegation was specific to medication being kept in a secondary location (file cabinet in office), which Licensing was not given access to. LPA Colvin was granted access by the Administrator to medication both in the main storage area for the medication in the kitchen, as well as to the cabinet in the office. LPA Colvin confirmed the presence of medication in the cabinet in the office, but LPA Colvin was granted access to both the office and the cabinet by Administrator Danny Barrett without any difficulty. Therefore, based on observations, the allegation "Staff is denying CCL representatives from inspecting the facility" is UNFOUNDED. We have found the complaint is unfounded, meaning that the allegations are false, could not have happened and are without a reasonable basis. LPA Colvin conducted an exit interview with Administrator Danny Barrett and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2021 · control 18-AS-20200316140401

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 29, 2021

Additional Personal Rights...in Privately Operated Facilities: (a) In addition to the rights listed...residents...shall have all of the following personal rights: (4) To care, supervision, and services that meet their individual needs and are delivered by staff...to meet their needs. This requirement was not met by: Based on record review, the Licensee did not comply with the above regulation with at least one resident. LPA Colvin observed that facility records instructed staff to cut R1's Carvedilol, though R1's medication bottles did not reflect this instruction. This was an immediate health risk for R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to conduct a self-audit of all resident medications and medication records to ensure that staff instructions reflect what the physician has prescribed. Licensee may self-certify to LPA Colvin once the self-audit is complete. Self-certification to be submitted by Plan of Correction date of 11/29/21.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87307(d)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 13, 2021

Personal Accommodations and Services: (d) The following space and safety provisions shall apply to all facilities: (2) The premises shall be maintained in a state of good repair and shall provide a safe and healthful environment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, the Licensee did not comply with the above regulation with two areas of the facility. LPA Colvin observed cracks in the driveway making the ground unlevel by 1 inch as well as a hole in the walkway in the backyard. This is a potential safety risk for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to have areas in disrepair mentioned in report fixed and maintained in a healthful manner. Licensee to provide LPA Colvin with photographic proof of repaired areas by Plan of Correction date of 12/13/21.

The state marks this report as 8 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 7. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Nov 29, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type B, Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Crystal Colvin arrived at the facility unannounced for the purpose of continuing investigation of a complaint (#18-AS-20200316140401). While at the facility, LPA Colvin observed the following items that were not in compliance with Title 22 Regulations: Licensing Fees - During LPA Colvin's preparation for today's inspection, LPA Colvin observed that the Licensee is behind on their annual fees, and has not made a payment towards their fees since 1/31/20. As of today's inspection, the Licensee owes California Department of Social Services (CDSS) $1,236.50. This is a combination of annual licensing fees and late penalties, which have been accruing since 2019. Deficiency cited. Obstructed Walkway - Upon LPA Colvin's arrival, LPA Colvin observed that the walkway leading from the driveway to the front door of the facility was partially blocked by a pile of dirt and a traffic/hazard cone. This obstruction covered more than 50% of the width of the walkway. The facility is licensed for non-ambulatory residents, which further implores the need for clear walkways at all times. Deficiency cited. Reporting Requirements - During LPA Colvin's investigation today, LPA Colvin observed records from an Emergency Room for one resident (R1) from March 2021 in relation to a fall. LPA Colvin's review of the facility's submitted incident reports shows that no reports were submitted since 2019. Administrator Danny was able to produce reports for this incident and others, though it does not appear that they were sent to Licensing. Based on LPA Colvin's observations, the facility was cited. LPA Colvin provided a copy of this report, LIC809Ds, and appeal rights to Administrator Danny Barrett.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2021

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 1569.185(e) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 13, 2021

Fees for license or applications; use of revenues; collected; denial or forfeiture: (e) The failure of an applicant for licensure or a licensee to pay all applicable and accrued fees and civil penalties shall constitute grounds for denial or forfeiture of a license. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on record review, the Licensee did not comply with the above regulation with the facility's licensing fees. LPA Colvin observed that the Licensee owes $1,236.50 and has been behind on licensing fees since 2019. This is a potential safety risk for all residents, as the license may be revoked.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to pay all fees due by Plan of Correction date of 12/13/21. Licensee may self-certify to LPA Colvin once payment has been made.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87307(d)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 13, 2021

Personal Accommodations and Services: (d) The following space and safety provisions shall apply to all facilities: (6) All outdoor and indoor passageways and stairways shall be kept free of obstruction. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on observations, the Licensee did not comply with the above requirement with at least one walkway. LPA Colvin observed the walkway from the driveway to the front door to be over halfway obstructed by a pile of dirt and a hazard cone. This is a potential safety risk to all residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to remove debris from walkway by Plan of Correction date of 12/13/21. Licensee to provide LPA Colvin with photographic proof of cleared walkway.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1)(D) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 30, 2021

Reporting Requirements: (a) Each licensee shall furnish...such reports...including...the following: (1) A written report shall be submitted...within seven days of...any of the events specified...(D) Any incident which threatens the welfare, safety or health of any resident... This requirement was not met by: Based on record review, the Licensee did not comply with the above regulation with at least one resident. LPA Colvin observed that R1 went to the Emergency Room in March 2021 in regards to a fall, but no report was submitted to Licensing. This is an immediate personal rights violation of R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 29, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee agrees to review Title 22 Regulation Section 87211 regarding Reporting Requirements, as well as conduct an all-staff training on Reporting Requirements. Licensee may self-certify completion of review of Regulation Section 87211, and to submit Statement of Understanding regarding requirements for reporting incidents to Licensing. Self-certification and Statement of Understanding to be submitted to LPA Colvin by Plan of Correction date of 11/30/21.

Oct 4, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Administrator did not allow resident to return to facility due to their medical health decision

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Stephanie Torres, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the investigation into the above allegation. The LPA met with Administrator, Danny Barrett, and informed him of the purpose of the visit. Pertaining to the allegation, "Administrator did not allow resident to return to facility due to their medical health decision," it was alleged Administrator, Danny Barrett, did not allow Resident One (R1) to return to the facility on September 11, 2021 due to not having received a COVID-19 vaccination. The LPA initiated the investigation into the allegation on October 04, 2021; staff interviews were conducted, records reviewed, and copies of pertinent documentation were obtained. Administrator Barrett was interviewed and denied the allegation; he reported the resident was only been asked to show proof of a negative COVID-19 test result. Copies of email correspondence between Barrett and R1's responsible party reveal Barrett required proof of COVID-19 vaccination prior to allowing R1 to return to the facility. This posed a risk to the personal rights of the resident in care. Therefore, based on records, this allegation is deemed SUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is Substantiated substantiated means the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. A citation will be issued in accordance with the California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division 6, Chapter 8). An exit interview was conducted with Administrator Barrett, in which this report was reviewed and a copy provided. A copy of LIC 811 and Appeal Rights were also issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2021 · control 18-AS-20210928145559

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(16) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 8, 2021

PERSONAL RIGHTS OF RESIDENTS IN ALL FACILITIES: Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: To receive or reject medical care or other services. This requirement was not met, as evidenced by: Based on records, the Licensee did not ensure R1 was permitted to reject medical care or other services. Copies of email correspondence between Barrett and R1's responsible party reveal Barrett required proof of COVID-19 vaccination prior to allowing R1 to return to the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 4, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator stated written proof will be sent to the Department to indicate the resident may return without any proof of COVID-19 vaccination or testing.

Aug 16, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not maintain facility at a comfortable temperature. Resident missed medication.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George arrived unannounced at the facility to investigate as well as to deliver findings for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA met with Administrator Daniel Barrett and explained the purpose of the visit as well as the elements of the allegations. The allegation(s) were investigated by the department. The investigation consisted of observation, interviews and record review. Allegation: Staff do not maintain facility at a comfortable temperature. Upon entry to the facility LPA observed the facility to be at a cool and comfortable temperature, as it was 90 degrees Fahrenheit at the time of the visit. LPA conducted interviews with five of the six residents, one resident was asleep at the time of LPAs visit. LPA interviewed Resident # 2 (R2) whom stated that they were not able to remember if it were too cold or not, because it was a long time ago, and that everything was fine now, as they were smiling. LPA did observe there to be a white rectangular shaped heater on wheels available for R2 to use, should the temperature become too cold. LPA interviewed four other residents whom stated that there were not any issues with the temperature of the Unsubstantiated facility, and that they had an extra blanket to use should they become cold. Administrator did state that R2 did complain about their room being too cold, and that the facility immediately acted on the complaint. Administrator revealed to LPA the measures that the facility has taken to assist with providing a comfortable temperature. Such as a providing a heater, closing the vent, and covering up the window from the sun room that R2 felt the draft was coming from. R2s bed is in between a small window and wall to the sun room. Based on observation and interview the allegation of Staff do not maintain facility at a comfortable temperature is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Allegation: Resident missed medication. LPA reviewed the Medical Authorization form (MAR) for September 2020. R2 is prescribed to have Magnesium Duloxetine, Vitamin B12, Vitamin D3, multivitamin, and Sulfamethoxazole to be given in the morning . Per the September 2020 MAR for R2, all medications were signed off as being administered except for the AM medication on September 20, 2020, for multiple residents. There was not an explanation provided on the MAR. Per the facility's communication log notes dated 9/20/20, state that all medications were given for every resident. Administrator stated that he believes that the staff forgot to sign them off. LPA conducted interviews and R2 stated that they are getting their medication everyday. There was not enough evidence to prove whether there were missed medications or not. Based on observation, interview and record review the allegation of Resident missed medication is UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaint is UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is unsubstantiated at this time. An exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Daniel Barrett.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 16, 2021 · control 18-AS-20200916091515

4 of 6 beds were occupied at the March 24, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

California Home for the Adult Deaf, Inc. (Chad), licensed since 2017.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2017, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
17
Total complaints
5
Substantiated allegations
0
Type A citations
0
Type B citations
0

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2017, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations00
Type B citations00
Substantiated allegations00
Total complaints50

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad)

Is California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad) licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad) licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad) been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 17 state visits over the same years.

Is California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad) still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.

What does California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad) cost?

$4,900 a month to start — listed by the home on its own website · October 5, 2026.

The home lists this starting rate on its own website for the monthly rate, seen October 5, 2026.

Among 31 other homes of a similar licensed size in Riverside that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,925 to $4,725 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 31 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad) take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by California Home for the Adult Deaf, Inc. (Chad), per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Doctors Hospital of Riverside is 1.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad) keep a resident on hospice?

Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”

California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad) license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “CALIFORNIA HOME FOR THE ADULT DEAF (CHAD)”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #331800086. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to California Home for the Adult Deaf, Inc. (Chad), per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 17 state inspection visits since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 17 state visits in that period.
  • 5 complaints and 0 substantiated allegations on file since 2017, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is March 24, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Riverside County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Riverside · 0.8 mi

    Citrus Place

    Large community · licensed for 140

    Starting rate

    $3,000 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Riverside · 0.9 mi

    California Manor Guest Home #1

    Mid-size home · licensed for 12

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,200 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,550

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
  • Map

    Riverside · 0.2 mi

    St. Rita Residence

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,800 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,900

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Riverside · 1.0 mi

    Edye's Comfort Living

    Small home · licensed for 4

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,350 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,600–$5,400
    • Assisted living: Licensed by California as a Residential Care Facility for the Elderly — the assisted-living license category.
  • Map

    Riverside · 1.2 mi

    Diamond Living Home Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,500 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,700–$5,550

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Riverside · 1.3 mi

    Blessed Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,900 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,000

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Riverside County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
CH

Call California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad)

Riverside · Licensed for 6

(626) 701-8960

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

From the home’s website, chadhome.org:

(626) 461-7425 · main line · seen October 5, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad)

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages