California Home For The Adult Deaf (chad) is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Riverside, Riverside County, California — state license #331800086, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 22 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated March 24, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

California Home For The Adult Deaf (chad)

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Riverside, CA · Riverside County
LicensedWheelchairMemory care not on fileHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #331800086, held since 2017 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3615 Crowell Ave · Riverside, Riverside County
Phone
(626) 701-8960
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
6 NON-AMBULATORY.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 22 times and filed 22 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated March 24, 2026.

Most recent state visit
March 24, 2026
Occupancy at the November 25, 2024 visit
5 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 16, 2021 to November 25, 2024. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 12 of 22 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 3 documents
Mar 24, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 24, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff member refused t give a resident their medication.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez visited the facility to further investigate into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA arrived at facility and was greeted at the door by Barbara Smith-enos, caregiver and granted entry and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included a tour of the physical plant of the facility, records review, interviews with the following: 5 out of 5 residents, and staff. It is alleged staff member refused to give a resident their medication. LPA Martinez observed and reviewed medication that is locked in the kitchen cabinet and observed medication to be accurate for all five residents. Records collected by LPA Torres on visit conducted on March 10, 2022, revealed for resident Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2024 · control 18-AS-20220301090049
Nov 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unlawful Eviction Staff do not prevent resident from harming other resident(s) while in care Food services are inadequate Staff handle resident in a rough manner Staff force resident to take medication causing injury Staff threaten resident in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez visited the facility to further investigate into the above identified complaint allegations. LPA arrived at facility and was greeted at the door by Barbara Smith-enos, caregiver and granted entry and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included a tour of the physical plant of the facility, records review, interviews with the following: 5 out of 5 residents, and 3 of 3 staff. It is alleged a wrongful eviction was given. Based on record review for LIC624 unusual incident report received for resident (R1) for April 06, 2024, indicate the following: 4/3/24 client hurt caregiver with a hand jab(s) on the neck. 3 day eviction notice given, 4/4/24 client asked for scissors, refused to say why. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 25, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240404133620
Apr 29, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not properly trained Facility staff are restraining resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation and deliver findings for the allegations listed above. LPA was granted entry and met with Licensee Danny Barret and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff are not properly trained” it was alleged that Staff One (S1) was working at the facility without completing their training. LPA conducted interviews and record review regarding the allegation. Interviews with Administrator Barret on 09/10/2020 revealed that two of the staff members had not completed the 20 and 40 hours of training for the year per Health and Safety Code 1569.625 and 1569.69. Administrator Barret’s interview revealed S1 had not yet completed the required training for the year. Therefore, based on interviews and record review the allegation facility staff are not properly trained has been deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 29, 2024 · control 18-AS-20200904122837
Jan 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 27, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff speaks inappropriately towards client while in care Staff retaliated against client while in care

On 9/27/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate the above allegations. LPA was accompanied by a Community Care Licensing approved ASL interpreter to assist LPA's communications with facility staff and residents. LPA met with Licensee, Danny Barrett, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews, documented observations, and conducted records reviews. It was alleged that "Staff speaks inappropriately towards client while in care". Allegedly Staff#1 (S1) had yelled at Resident #1(R1). LPA interviewed staff who denied the allegation. LPA interviewed resident who stated they would not recall the incident. Therefore, the allegation was unsubstantited. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 27, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200316140401
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations3typical 0
Substantiated complaints3typical 0
Total complaints8typical 0
State visits on file22typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2017.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202623020254402024341202334120224402021332
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$3,500$5,500 /mo
our estimate — Riverside County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (626) 701-8960

Is California Home For The Adult Deaf (chad) licensed?

Yes — California Home For The Adult Deaf (chad) is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Riverside (Riverside County): California license #331800086, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 22 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated March 24, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can California Home For The Adult Deaf (chad) care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists California Home For The Adult Deaf (chad) with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory; it does not list dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record6 NON-AMBULATORY.

How much does California Home For The Adult Deaf (chad) cost?

California's public licensing record does not include California Home For The Adult Deaf (chad)'s monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Riverside County typically runs $3,500–$5,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $3,000–$5,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does California Home For The Adult Deaf (chad) accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at California Home For The Adult Deaf (chad) through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Riverside County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 6 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on November 25, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for California Home For The Adult Deaf (chad)?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 22 state visits and 22 dated documents since 2021 for California Home For The Adult Deaf (chad); 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated November 25, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff member refused t give a resident their medication.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez visited the facility to further investigate into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA arrived at facility and was greeted at the door by Barbara Smith-enos, caregiver and granted entry and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included a tour of the physical plant of the facility, records review, interviews with the following: 5 out of 5 residents, and staff. It is alleged staff member refused to give a resident their medication. LPA Martinez observed and reviewed medication that is locked in the kitchen cabinet and observed medication to be accurate for all five residents. Records collected by LPA Torres on visit conducted on March 10, 2022, revealed for resident Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 25, 2024 · control 18-AS-20220301090049
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnlawful Eviction Staff do not prevent resident from harming other resident(s) while in care Food services are inadequate Staff handle resident in a rough manner Staff force resident to take medication causing injury Staff threaten resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez visited the facility to further investigate into the above identified complaint allegations. LPA arrived at facility and was greeted at the door by Barbara Smith-enos, caregiver and granted entry and LPA explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included a tour of the physical plant of the facility, records review, interviews with the following: 5 out of 5 residents, and 3 of 3 staff. It is alleged a wrongful eviction was given. Based on record review for LIC624 unusual incident report received for resident (R1) for April 06, 2024, indicate the following: 4/3/24 client hurt caregiver with a hand jab(s) on the neck. 3 day eviction notice given, 4/4/24 client asked for scissors, refused to say why. Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 25, 2024 · control 18-AS-20240404133620
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not properly trained Facility staff are restraining resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sara Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to conclude the investigation and deliver findings for the allegations listed above. LPA was granted entry and met with Licensee Danny Barret and explained the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff are not properly trained” it was alleged that Staff One (S1) was working at the facility without completing their training. LPA conducted interviews and record review regarding the allegation. Interviews with Administrator Barret on 09/10/2020 revealed that two of the staff members had not completed the 20 and 40 hours of training for the year per Health and Safety Code 1569.625 and 1569.69. Administrator Barret’s interview revealed S1 had not yet completed the required training for the year. Therefore, based on interviews and record review the allegation facility staff are not properly trained has been deemed SUBSTANTIATED at this time. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 29, 2024 · control 18-AS-20200904122837

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff speaks inappropriately towards client while in care Staff retaliated against client while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9/27/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Janira Arreola, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility in order to investigate the above allegations. LPA was accompanied by a Community Care Licensing approved ASL interpreter to assist LPA's communications with facility staff and residents. LPA met with Licensee, Danny Barrett, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA conducted interviews, documented observations, and conducted records reviews. It was alleged that "Staff speaks inappropriately towards client while in care". Allegedly Staff#1 (S1) had yelled at Resident #1(R1). LPA interviewed staff who denied the allegation. LPA interviewed resident who stated they would not recall the incident. Therefore, the allegation was unsubstantited. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 27, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200316140401
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not have proper training
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tricia Danielson arrived unannounced to the facility to conclude an investigation into the allegation listed above. LPA was accompanied by a Community Care Licensing approved ASL interpreter to assist LPA's communications with facility staff and residents. LPA met with Administratior (AD) Danny Barrett and explained the purpose of the visit. During today's visit, LPA interviewed one (1) resident, one (1) staff and requested pertinent documents. Regarding the allegation "Staff do not have proper training", it was alleged that Staff #1 (S1) had not been properly trained to provide assistance to Resident #1 (R1) for their medical condition. Interview with AD indicated all staff had been trained but when LPA requested 2020 training records for S1 they were unable to be located. S1 is no longer employed at the facility and could not be interviewed. Based on interviews conducted and a lack of records to be reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has bCDSS inspection report, July 27, 2023 · control 18-AS-20200225092314
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not seek medical attention in a timely manner for a resident.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas visited the facility unannounced to deliver the finding on the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator Danny Barrett and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file reviews and interviews with relevant parties. The allegation alleged that on January 2, 2020, or January 2, 2021, from 1:30 p.m. to 9:40 p.m., resident #1 (R1) had several seizures, and the facility did not contact 911. LPA Nickolas’ interview with the facility's administrator revealed that R1 sometimes has seizures, and the doctor adjusted their medication. The administrator stated that the facility must call emergency services if R1’s seizures last longer than five (5) minutes. The finding is Unsubstantiated. There is no evidence or witnesses to corroborate the allegation. A finding of Unsubstantiated means although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or dCDSS inspection report, April 13, 2023 · control 18-AS-20210127091959
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to treat resident with dignity and respect. Staff mismanaged resident's medication. Staff failed to provide a comfortable and safe environment for the resident. Staff failed to provide resident with privacy.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rayshaun Nickolas visited the facility unannounced to deliver the finding on the above allegations. LPA met with Administrator Danny Barrett and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of file reviews and interviews with relevant parties. Allegation #1: “Staff failed to treat resident with dignity and respect”. The allegation alleged that staff #1 (S1) has been picking on resident # 1 (R1) for the last three (3) months by making inappropriate comments and spreading rumors about R1 to the other facility staff members. LPA Nickolas' interview with the facility's administrator revealed that the administrator denies that facility staff members failed to treat R1 with dignity and respect. LPA Nickolas' interviews with residents revealed that no residents witnessed or admitted to the staff's failure to treat residents with dignity and respect. The finding is Unsubstantiated. There is no evidence or witnesses to corroborate the allegatioCDSS inspection report, April 13, 2023 · control 18-AS-20210125111316

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility grounds is in disrepair Staff is mishandling clients medication while in care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Crystal Colvin arrived at the facility unannounced for the purpose of continuing investigation of a complaint with the above allegation(s). LPA Colvin met with Administrator Danney Barrett, and informed him of the purpose of today's visit. Below is a summary of the findings of the investigation: Regarding allegation "Facility grounds is in disrepair": LPA Colvin observed numerous cracks in the concrete driveway, some of which caused the ground to be unlevel. LPA Colvin placed her writing pen next to the crack and measured the difference between the height difference of both sides of the crack to be approximately one inch. This is a safety hazard for residents, especially the non-ambulatory residents that this facility is licensed to retain, as they require mobility devices to assist with their movement. LPA Colvin additionally observed a hole in-between the brick walkway in the backyard, which leads to the Administrative office. While this hole was markeCDSS inspection report, November 29, 2021 · control 18-AS-20200316140401
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedAdministrator did not allow resident to return to facility due to their medical health decision
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Stephanie Torres, conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to initiate the investigation into the above allegation. The LPA met with Administrator, Danny Barrett, and informed him of the purpose of the visit. Pertaining to the allegation, "Administrator did not allow resident to return to facility due to their medical health decision," it was alleged Administrator, Danny Barrett, did not allow Resident One (R1) to return to the facility on September 11, 2021 due to not having received a COVID-19 vaccination. The LPA initiated the investigation into the allegation on October 04, 2021; staff interviews were conducted, records reviewed, and copies of pertinent documentation were obtained. Administrator Barrett was interviewed and denied the allegation; he reported the resident was only been asked to show proof of a negative COVID-19 test result. Copies of email correspondence between Barrett and R1's responsible party reveal Barrett required proof ofCDSS inspection report, October 4, 2021 · control 18-AS-20210928145559
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not maintain facility at a comfortable temperature. Resident missed medication.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javina George arrived unannounced at the facility to investigate as well as to deliver findings for the allegation(s) listed above. LPA met with Administrator Daniel Barrett and explained the purpose of the visit as well as the elements of the allegations. The allegation(s) were investigated by the department. The investigation consisted of observation, interviews and record review. Allegation: Staff do not maintain facility at a comfortable temperature. Upon entry to the facility LPA observed the facility to be at a cool and comfortable temperature, as it was 90 degrees Fahrenheit at the time of the visit. LPA conducted interviews with five of the six residents, one resident was asleep at the time of LPAs visit. LPA interviewed Resident # 2 (R2) whom stated that they were not able to remember if it were too cold or not, because it was a long time ago, and that everything was fine now, as they were smiling. LPA did observe there to be a white rectangularCDSS inspection report, August 16, 2021 · control 18-AS-20200916091515

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 22 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
22
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(626) 701-8960
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run California Home For The Adult Deaf (chad)? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.