Small home · Licensed for 6 · Riverside
Emk Residential Care for Elderly
7750 Bolero Drive, Riverside, CA 92509Licensed since 2019
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Wheelchairup to 6 residents
- Dementia
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
- Bedriddenup to 1 resident
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.
983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
If memory loss develops
Dementia-care designation on file
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Emk Residential Care for Elderly: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,700a month to start
Likely $3,850–$5,800
From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,700likely a month
Starting monthly rate$4,700likely $3,850–$5,800
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,850–$6,000
- $4,700
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,550–$9,200
- $7,200
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes12 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,800 to $4,900
12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,850–$4,500.
- Allwise Residential Home 3Jurupa Valley · 0.8 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Rosalina's Home CareRiverside · 1.6 mi · Small home$3,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Skypark Assisted Living FacilityJurupa Valley · 2.7 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Live in Comfort CareRiverside · 2.7 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Royalty Senior LivingJurupa Valley · 3.0 mi · Small home$4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Casa MiaMira Loma · 3.7 mi · Mid-size home$2,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Alicia Pines Residential CareRiverside · 3.9 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Agape Care HavenRiverside · 4.1 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Agape Care Home RiversideRiverside · 4.3 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- California Home for the Adult Deaf (Chad)Riverside · 4.6 mi · Small home$4,900Listed on its own website · the monthly rate · seen October 5, 2026
- Agape CottageRiverside · 4.8 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- The Galleria View Villa IIRiverside · 4.9 mi · Small home$4,200Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
7750 Bolero Drive, Riverside, CA 92509Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Riverside Community HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list4.2 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #331880838 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 7 of 12 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Unsubstantiated”.
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff yelled at resident Staff spoke inappropriately to resident Licensee illegally evicted resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to conduct a complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA Prieto met with licensee Monico and explained the elements of the complaint. Allegation #1 - LPA Prieto interviewed staff #1 (S1) who states that she has not yelled at resident #1 (R1), not spoken to R1 inappropriately. LPA Prieto interviewed S2 who states that she has not yelled at R1, nor spoken to R1 inappropriately. LPA Prieto interviewed S3 who states that he has not yelled at R1, nor spoken to R1 inappropriately. S1, S2 and S3 have stated that R1 is the one who has spoken loudly and has had inappropriate behavior at the facility. Facility administrator (S3) stated that R1 voluntarily exited the facility and collected monies for the month of his exit in full. A video captured this exchange on the day of exit. A written statement was made and signed by R1 indicating that the exit of the facility is voluntary and no coercion to R1. The letter was signed 05/27/2026. Unsubstantiated Based on the information obtained there is not enough evidence that staff yelled at resident, staff spoke inappropriately to resident and Licensee illegally evicted resident. Therefore, the allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. This report was signed by LPA Prieto and Licensee Panaligan and a copy was left with the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2026 · control 56-AS-20260527083914
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 1, 2025Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file
Type of visit: POC
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to verify clearance of Plan of Correction from visit that was conducted on 11/16/2025. LPA Rico met with Licensee/ Administrator Marilou Panaligan and explained the purpose of the visit. The following Plan of Correction (POC)s were cleared at the time of the visit: The Licensee was cited on 11/16/2025 for Incidental Medical and Dental Care Services. During today’s visit, LPA Rico observed the facility had made corrections for all medication errors. An updated resident’s MAR was created along with the PRN. In addition, training was also provided to staff. Therefore, the POC was cleared at today's visit. The Licensee was cited on 11/16/2025 for Postural Supports. During today’s visit, LPA Rico observed the facility had made the corrections and obtained a physician order for resident’s bedrails. Therefore, the POC was cleared at today's visit. The Licensee was cited on 11/16/2025 for Maintenance and Operation. During today’s visit, LPA Rico observed the facility had made the corrections. The facility cabinets, floors, and bathroom were cleaned and organized, along with resident's personal items. Therefore, the POC was cleared at today's visit. The Licensee was cited on 11/16/2025 for Other Provisions. During today’s visit, LPA Rico observed the facility conducted an emergency fire drill and created emergency supplies readily available. In addition, the facility had cleared all emergency pathways. Therefore, the POC was cleared at today's visit. The Licensee was cited on 11/16/2025 for Hospice Care for Terminally Ill Residents. During today’s visit, LPA Rico observed the facility obtained resident’s hospice care plan for residents. Therefore, the POC was cleared at today's visit. Based on facility tour, record review and interviews, the facility Plan of Corrections has been cleared. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to the Licensee/ Administrator Marilou Panaligan.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2025
Nov 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Rico made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection LPA met with Administrator/Licensee Marilou Panaligan and granted entry to the facility. Licensed capacity is (6) current census (6). LPA was accompanied by Administrator/Licensee Marilou Panaligan to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. During facility tour, LPA Rico observed boxes and furniture blocking emergency exit for bedridden room. In addition, LPA observed the facility kitchen floor and cabinets dirty. LPA requested the facility to be deep clean, de- clutter and organize. Residents’ personal hygiene was not labeled. Lose toothbrushes were mixed with other residents items. Staff were unable to tell which personal items belong to what resident. LPA requested emergency food, water and supplies to be placed in a storage box to be made available. Furthermore, LPA Rico observed the facility had five out of the six residents with full bed rails. During record review the five residents did not have a physician order nor hospice care plan indicating they require full bed rails. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of residents in care. Facility has a variety of food available for residents. Dishes, cups, and utensils were also stored properly. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Record Review: LPA reviewed (6) resident file for admission agreements, updated physician reports, and needs and services plans. The licensee stated that R1 and R2 are part of hospice. Both residents did not have a hospice care plan nor completed hospice binder. During medication audit, LPA Rico observed staff had falsely all residents’ medication by documenting medications days in advance.. Blood Pressure for R3 and R4 was also falsely and documented days in advance. LPA observed lose medication in bin, and medications not locked away. Medication did not include starting day and end day. Furthermore, R3 medication was transfer to a Monday through Sunday container. In addition, R3 PRN medication was documented but the date/time and resident’s response were missing. LPA also reviewed (3) staff files for First Aid/CPR certification, criminal record clearance, training, and health screening.Facility did not have their emergency drills updated. Last Emergency drill was conducted in September 30, 2024. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, (11) deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Administrator/Licensee Marilou Panaligan. Along with a copy of Appeal Rightsthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 16, 2025
Sep 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident in care was not provided meals in a timely manner. Staff did not provide proper medication assistance to resident in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to conclude a complaint investigation regarding the allegations made in this complaint. LPA Prieto met with Ms See and explained the elements of the complaint. Allegation #1 - LPA interviewed resident #1 (R1), R2, R3, R4 at the facility, all stating that they are receiving three (3) meals a day and those meals are being served in a timely manner. Interview with staff #1 (S1), states that meals are served during appropriate hours for breakfast , lunch and dinner. Allegation #2 - LPA interviewed resident #1 (R1), R2, R3, R4 at the facility, all stating that they are having their medication dispensed accordingly and as prescribed. S1 states all medication are being dispensed accordingly and as prescribed. Unsubstantiated Based on the information obtained there is not enough evidence to support the allegations made in this complaint. Therefore, the allegations are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. This report was signed by LPA Prieto and Ms See and a copy was left with the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 25, 2025 · control 56-AS-20231226135432
20241 state visit · 1 document
Dec 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required comprehensive annual inspection LPA met with Monico Panaligan, administrator and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there was three (3) staff present, and three (3) residents were present. The facility is a four (4) bedroom, three (3), bathroom home, with a kitchen/dining area, living room, and detached garage. Licensed capacity is (6) current census (6). LPA was accompanied by licensee Panaligan, to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected client bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathrooms to be in compliance. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Alarms were tested and found to be in working order. Water temperature measured 125.5 degrees at today's inspection. Posters such as personal rights, the CCL complaint poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to clients in care. There was a designated storage space for client/staff files. Medications are kept inside lock box inaccessible to clients. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for clients in care Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of clients in care. Care & Supervision: Facility has sufficient care staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. All staff members working in the facility have criminal record clearance through the department Record Review: LPA reviewed six (6) resident's records. Resident #1 (R1) did not have a Physician's Report with a negative TB result during time of inspection. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC 809, LIC 809D and appeal rights) were discussed and provided to Mr Panaligan and a copy was left with the facility.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 6, 2024
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 8, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required continued comprehensive annual inspection LPA met with Christian See, Designated Facility Representative and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there was two (2) staff present, and six (6) residents were present. The facility is a five (5) bedroom, three (3), bathroom home, with a kitchen/dining area, living room. Licensed capacity is (6) current census of six (6). LPA was accompanied by Mr See to conduct a general overall inspection, which included, but was not limited to, the following: Physical Plant: The facility is operating in the capacity approved by Community Care Licensing (CCL). There are no obstructions to indoor and outdoor passageways. The facility is maintained at a comfortable temperature. LPA inspected client bedrooms; they are equipped with required furniture such as: mattresses, night stands, storage space, and sufficient lighting; bathrooms were clean, and appliances were operating appropriately. LPA observed sufficient furniture and lighting throughout the facility. LPA measured and observed the water temperatures in the bathrooms which measured 116.5 degrees F and 124.5 degrees F, respectively. The facility is equipped with operating smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms. Smoke detectors were tested and three (3) were found not to be in working order, as well as one non-functioning carbon monoxide detector. Water temperature in the kitchen area measured 133.7 degrees at today's inspection. *****Continued on LIC 809C ******* Posters such as personal rights, ombusman poster, and the disaster plan were posted in a common area. The CCL complaint poster was not posted at time of inspection. Cleaning supplies, toxins, sharps, and other dangerous items were kept inaccessible to clients in care. There was a designated storage space for client/staff files. Medications are kept inside lock box inaccessible to clients. Overall, the facility is clean, in good repair, and operating in safe conditions for clients in care. Client and Staff File Review: Six (6) resident files were reviewed during today's inspection. No Physician's report was observed for resident #2 (R2) and no Appraisal was observed for R4 and R6. Staff #1 (S1) file did not have a tuberculosis clearance and S2 file did not show the date of tuberculosis clearance nor the form of form of test, whether it be skin test or x-ray. Food Service: Non-perishable and perishable food supply is sufficient for number of clients in care. Care & Supervision: Facility does not have sufficient wake staff for coverage 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. All staff members working in the facility have criminal record clearance through the department Based on the observations made during today’s visit, deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC 809 and LIC 809C and LIC 809D) was discussed, signed by both LPA Prieto and Mr See and a copy was left with the facility, along with the appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 8, 2023
Dec 7, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto and LPA Anna Buena arrive to the facility to conduct an unannounced annual inspection. LPA's were greeted by staff Christian See and allowed entry. Inspection consisted of file review, staff interviews, documentation and facility tour. Due to time restraints a continuation of this inspection is needed.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 7, 2023
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 5 documents
20232 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident sustained unexplained bruise. Staff not maintaining residents grooming needs.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ryan Gardner made an unannounced visit to investigate and deliver findings for the allegations listed above. LPA stated the purpose of the visit and was granted entry and met with Licensee/Administrator Marilou Panaligan. The investigation consisted of resident interviews, staff interviews, and document review. For allegation, Resident sustained unexplained bruise: Interviews with residents and interviews with the staff revealed that there was no evidence of staff causing bruising to the residents in care. The residents denied being hit, pushed, physically injured, and or bruised by the staff. The staff denied hitting, pushing, causing injuries, and or bruising the residents. Document review of R1’s facility records did not indicate that R1 had bruising. LPA was not able to speak to R1 due to R1 passing away in November of 2020. Unsubstantiated For allegation, Staff not maintaining residents grooming needs: Interviews with residents and interviews with the staff revealed that there was no evidence of staff neglecting the resident’s grooming needs. The residents denied that the staff is neglecting their grooming needs. The staff denied neglecting the resident’s grooming needs. LPA was not able to speak to R1 due to R1 passing away in November of 2020. Overall, there was not enough evidence to collaborate the allegations listed above. Based on evidence obtained during the investigation, the two (2) allegations listed above are deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that the complaints are UNSUBSTANTIATED means although the allegations may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur. During today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC9099) was discussed and provided to Licensee/Administrator Marilou Panaligan, along with a copy of the appeal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 6, 2023 · control 18-AS-20201105165153
Feb 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility does not have an Administrator. Facility not follow reporting requirements as regulated.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with staff Marineth Reyes and Henry Reyes. There was not administrator at the facility during time of visit, with designated administrator qualified to perform the duties of an administrator for approximately 30 days prior to visit. Review of licensing records show that the faciity has not reported any incidents occuring at the facility since June 2022. LPA observed resident #1 (R1) with an injury with no record of R1 visiting the hospital for that injury. Based on LPA observations, interviews which were conducted and records review, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met. Therefore the above allegation is found to be SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations (Title 22, Division) are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D). Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 28, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230223165108
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87405 · Plan of correction due date: Mar 7, 2023
Administrator - Qualifications and Duties All facilities shall have a qualified and currently certified administrator. When the administrator is not in the facility, there shall be coverage by a designated substitute who shall have qualifications adequate to be responsible and accountable for management This was not met as evidenced by: LPA arriving to the facility with no qualified administrator for approximately 30 days.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 28, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator to designate qualified administrator documentation to LPA by POC date and shall include that staff in their LIC 500 to by submitted to LPA by POC date
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 7, 2023
Reporting requirements Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency such reports as the Department may require, including, but not limited to, the following:A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency and to the person responsible for the resident within seven days of the occurrence This was not met as evidenced by; LPA observed resident #1 with an injury. CCL records reviewed to show that no incident report as been submitted of this injury or any other occurrence at the facility since June 2022the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 28, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator to submit declaration that reporting requirements will be met as well as previous incidents occurring at the facility since June 2022. This to be submitted to LPA by POC date.
Feb 28, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is over capacity. Facility serving food not of good quality. Facility does not maintain sufficient food and supplies for residents in care Facility retaining resident's with prohibited health conditions.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Javier Prieto arrived to the facility to initiate a complaint investigation regarding the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with staff Marineth Reyes and Henry Reyes who provide LPA with resident files (R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6). Review of resident records does not reveal any resident with a prohibited health condition. LPA met and observed all residents at time of visit. LPA observed the food supply and observed a sufficient supplies of perishables and non perishables with food being served of good quality and ample servings. Based on the information obtained there is not enough evidence that the facility is over capacity, facility is serving food not of good quality and the facility does not maintain sufficient food and supplies for residents and facility retaining resident's with prohibited health conditions. Therefore, the allegations that is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur, therefore the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 28, 2023 · control 56-AS-20230223165108
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20221 state visit · 1 document
Dec 8, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Paola Guerrero made an unannounced visit to the facility. The purpose of the visit was to conduct a required annual inspection, with an emphasis on infection control due to the COVID-19 pandemic. LPA met with Facility Caregiver Christian See and was granted entry to the facility. At the time of the visit there were two (2) staff, and five (5) residents present. LPA toured the facility inside and out and went over COVID-19 best practices for infection control and prevention with Christian. The facility has a plan in place which follows Community Care Licensing Division guidelines for COVID-19 testing, isolating/quarantining clients and properly caring for clients with COVID-19 positive results and/or exposures. The facility has a designated infection control lead person who has been tasked with tracking all COVID-19 cases and/or suspected cases, ensuring PPE supplies are maintained, cleaning and disinfection provisions are in adequate quantities, and that staff are trained in the proper use and disposal of PPE. The entrance of the facility has a check in process for visitors that includes a temperature check and a symptom check. The clients have hand sanitizer available to them throughout the facility, and the bathrooms were stocked with hand soap and paper towels. The facility has postings throughout the facility for proper cough etiquette, proper hand washing procedure, and/or social distancing guidelines. LPA requested to inspect the facility's Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) supply, located in administrators’ office. The facility has a full thirty (30) day supply of PPE items such as gloves, face shields, gowns, disinfectant, surgical masks, N95 masks, and hand sanitizer. All clients and staff are practicing all other COVID-19 precautions, which minimize the risk of them contracting COVID-19. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited per Title 22, Division 6, of the California Code of Regulations. An exit interview was conducted, and this report (LIC809) was discussed and provided to Facility Caregiver Christian See.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 8, 2022
20211 state visit · 1 document
Oct 29, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Melody Brown made an unannounced visit to the facility to conduct an annual inspection, with emphasis on infection control. LPA Brown was greeted and granted entrance by Caregiver Marineth Reyes and LPA Brown explained the purpose of today's visit. Caregiver Reyes accompanied LPA Brown on a tour of the inside and outside of the facility. Administrator Marilou Panaligan was contacted and arrived during the inspection. During today’s visit, LPA Brown made observation pertaining to the facility’s current infection control measures. LPA Brown observed a screening area, proper signages throughout the facility, sufficient hand hygiene supplies, cleaning supplies, and a sufficient supply of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). The facility has a designated infection control lead person who has been tasked with tracking all COVID-19 cases and/or suspected cases, cleaning and disinfection are in adequate quantities, and that staff are trained in overall infection control. The facility has a plan in place which follows Community Care Licensing guidelines for when and how long to test staff and residents for COVID-19, when and how to isolate/quarantine residents, and when to schedule cleaning and disinfection times of high traffic and frequently touched areas/surfaces. The facility also has a plan in place to monitor residents regularly for any changes in condition and to subsequently notify the resident’s physician and to notify all emergency agencies in the event of any COVID-19 related and/or suspected illnesses. Based on the observations made during today’s visit, no deficiencies were cited. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided to Administrator Marilou Panaligan.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 29, 2021
4 of 6 beds were occupied at the June 4, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Panaligan, Marilou H., licensed since 2019.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2019, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 12
- Total complaints
- 4
- Substantiated allegations
- 2
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 1
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2019, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 1 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 2 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 4 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Emk Residential Care for Elderly
Is Emk Residential Care for Elderly licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Emk Residential Care for Elderly licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Emk Residential Care for Elderly been cited?
1 Type A and 1 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.
Is Emk Residential Care for Elderly still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.
What does Emk Residential Care for Elderly cost?
$4,700 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,850–$5,800. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 32 other homes of a similar licensed size in Riverside that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,950 to $4,850 a month, and the middle figure is $4,000 (n = 32 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Emk Residential Care for Elderly take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Panaligan, Marilou H., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Riverside Community Hospital is 4.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Emk Residential Care for Elderly keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Emk Residential Care for Elderly license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “EMK RESIDENTIAL CARE FOR ELDERLY”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #331880838. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Panaligan, Marilou H., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 12 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 1 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 2 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is June 4, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Riverside County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Starting rate
$3,700 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$2,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $2,150–$3,550On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Starting rate
$4,500 a month to start
Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,100On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,850 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$6,000On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$3,950 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,200–$4,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Riverside County