Hampshire Manor Inc is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville, Placer County, California — state license #317005563, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 14 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 17, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

24 homes in view

Hampshire Manor Inc

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Roseville, CA · Placer County
LicensedWheelchairBedriddenMemory care not on fileHospice not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #317005563, held since 2015 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1203 Hampshire Court · Roseville, Placer County
Phone
(916) 742-5386
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 5 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE SIXTY AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE FOR FIVE (5) NON-AMBULATORY AND (1) BEDRIDDEN. ALLOWED UP TO THREE (3) HOSPICE RESIDENTSState service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 15 times and filed 14 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 17, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 17, 2026
Occupancy at the October 16, 2025 visit
4 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 22, 2024 to October 16, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 11 of 14 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 17, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 15, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20255 state visits · 6 documents
Dec 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from leaving the facility unassisted

Licensing Program Analysts Graham Gunby and Bethany Mirlohi arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings into the allegations listed above and met with Administrator, Cathy Dustin. The purpose of the visit was explained, and the complaint investigation findings were discussed. *Continued on LIC9099-C* Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250612102414
Jul 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Residents briefs are not changed often enough/some staff "double-diaper". Staff do not receive adequate training to care for residents. Not enough staff to meet resident needs, Insufficient food supply. Residents may run out of medications. Residents may run out of adult briefs/diapers.

On 7/25/2025 LPA Tryon went to the facility unannounced to complete the complaint. LPA met with staff Kim Bao Tram Tran and spoke with Cathy Dustin by phone. LPA was able to interview one staff member at the visit. Over the course of the complaint, LPA has interviewed the administrator, four staff, toured the facility including common areas, bedrooms, kitchen, bathrooms, storage areas, and garage. Regarding resident briefs, staff related that they change residents on a regular basis, and that they are able to keep them pretty clean and dry overall. LPA only heard of one or two "double-diaper" occasions, which were some time ago. This appears to be going smoothly. Allegation is unfounded. Regarding staff training, all staff interviewed felt that they received plenty of training, and understand their jobs. LPA has reviewed training records. Allegation is unfounded. Regarding there not being enough staff to meet resident needs, staff generally admitted they are very busy, but that overallthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250304155656
May 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff spoke to residents in an inappropriate manner. Staff did not report incidents involving residents as required. Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident. Staff left residents soiled for extended periods. Licensee does not provide planned activities for residents. Licensee allowed staff to work prior to obtaining a criminal record clearance. Licensee did not ensure staff were appropriately trained to provide care to residents

LPA Tryon visited the facility on 5/28/2025 to deliver the findings for the complaint. LPA met with Administrator Cathy Dustin. Over the course of the investigation LPA has interviewed one witness, administrator, six staff, two residents, reviewed documents, toured the facility. Regarding the allegation that staff spoke to residents in an inappropriate manner, LPA finds that there is no credible evidence that any staff has spoken to residents in an inappropriate manner or in an otherwise disrespectful manner. Allegation is unfounded. Regarding the allegation that staff did not report incidents involving residents as required, LPA has not found evidence that a particular incident was not reported as required. Allegation is unfounded. Regarding the allegation that staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident, it appears that medical assistance has been sought as appropriate. LPA finds no proof that help was unnecessarily delayed in a particular instance. Allegation is unfouthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025 · control 59-AS-20240829145358
May 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not ensure resident was hydrated resulting in hospitalization

LPA visited the facility on 5/28/2025 to deliver the findings of the complaint. LPA met with Administrator Cathy Dustin. Regarding allegation that facility staff did not ensure resident was hydrated resulting in hospitalization, through review of documentation it was learned that R1 had a history of urinary tract infections (UTI), and other medical conditions. There is no indication in the records that staff neglected or failed to keep R1 hydrated, fed, or mismanaged R1’s medications. Chart notes indicate staff were routinely offering R1 hydration. It is documented that on 7/24/2024, R1 refused to drink fluids, take medications, and refused to eat meals. Staff noticed the change in condition and contacted hospice and then sent R1 out to the hospital. R1 was hospitalized and diagnosed with failure to thrive. Therefore, there is no proof that staff were not ensuring resident was hydrated. Allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have hthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025 · control 59-AS-20240730111657
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not providing incontinence care to resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct investigation into allegation listed above. During today’s inspection LPA met with Administrator Cathy Dustin to review the complaint findings. LPA investigated the allegation, “Facility staff are not providing incontinence care to resident”. During investigation LPA interviewed staff and witnesses and reviewed resident documentation. LPA interviewed administrator in which she stated R1 admitted to the facility independent and ambulatory. R1 then had a fall and started on hospice services. R1 began to decline, and caregivers were having a hard time providing incontinence care to R1. Administrator stated incontinence care was always provided, but recommended R1 move to a higher level of care because they only had 1 caregiver per shift. Continuation on 9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240702123620
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 6, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints1typical 0
Total complaints5typical 0
State visits on file15typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2015.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202622020255612024220202322020221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Placer County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 742-5386

Is Hampshire Manor Inc licensed?

Yes — Hampshire Manor Inc is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville (Placer County): California license #317005563, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 14 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 17, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Hampshire Manor Inc care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Hampshire Manor Inc with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care and hospice care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE SIXTY AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE FOR FIVE (5) NON-AMBULATORY AND (1) BEDRIDDEN. ALLOWED UP TO THREE (3) HOSPICE RESIDENTS

How much does Hampshire Manor Inc cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Hampshire Manor Inc's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Hampshire Manor Inc accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Hampshire Manor Inc is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on October 16, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Hampshire Manor Inc?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 15 state visits and 14 dated documents since 2021 for Hampshire Manor Inc; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 16, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent resident from leaving the facility unassisted
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts Graham Gunby and Bethany Mirlohi arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings into the allegations listed above and met with Administrator, Cathy Dustin. The purpose of the visit was explained, and the complaint investigation findings were discussed. *Continued on LIC9099-C* SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 16, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250612102414
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResidents briefs are not changed often enough/some staff "double-diaper". Staff do not receive adequate training to care for residents. Not enough staff to meet resident needs, Insufficient food supply. Residents may run out of medications. Residents may run out of adult briefs/diapers.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 7/25/2025 LPA Tryon went to the facility unannounced to complete the complaint. LPA met with staff Kim Bao Tram Tran and spoke with Cathy Dustin by phone. LPA was able to interview one staff member at the visit. Over the course of the complaint, LPA has interviewed the administrator, four staff, toured the facility including common areas, bedrooms, kitchen, bathrooms, storage areas, and garage. Regarding resident briefs, staff related that they change residents on a regular basis, and that they are able to keep them pretty clean and dry overall. LPA only heard of one or two "double-diaper" occasions, which were some time ago. This appears to be going smoothly. Allegation is unfounded. Regarding staff training, all staff interviewed felt that they received plenty of training, and understand their jobs. LPA has reviewed training records. Allegation is unfounded. Regarding there not being enough staff to meet resident needs, staff generally admitted they are very busy, but that overallCDSS inspection report, July 25, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250304155656
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff spoke to residents in an inappropriate manner. Staff did not report incidents involving residents as required. Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident. Staff left residents soiled for extended periods. Licensee does not provide planned activities for residents. Licensee allowed staff to work prior to obtaining a criminal record clearance. Licensee did not ensure staff were appropriately trained to provide care to residents
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
LPA Tryon visited the facility on 5/28/2025 to deliver the findings for the complaint. LPA met with Administrator Cathy Dustin. Over the course of the investigation LPA has interviewed one witness, administrator, six staff, two residents, reviewed documents, toured the facility. Regarding the allegation that staff spoke to residents in an inappropriate manner, LPA finds that there is no credible evidence that any staff has spoken to residents in an inappropriate manner or in an otherwise disrespectful manner. Allegation is unfounded. Regarding the allegation that staff did not report incidents involving residents as required, LPA has not found evidence that a particular incident was not reported as required. Allegation is unfounded. Regarding the allegation that staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident, it appears that medical assistance has been sought as appropriate. LPA finds no proof that help was unnecessarily delayed in a particular instance. Allegation is unfouCDSS inspection report, May 28, 2025 · control 59-AS-20240829145358
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not ensure resident was hydrated resulting in hospitalization
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
LPA visited the facility on 5/28/2025 to deliver the findings of the complaint. LPA met with Administrator Cathy Dustin. Regarding allegation that facility staff did not ensure resident was hydrated resulting in hospitalization, through review of documentation it was learned that R1 had a history of urinary tract infections (UTI), and other medical conditions. There is no indication in the records that staff neglected or failed to keep R1 hydrated, fed, or mismanaged R1’s medications. Chart notes indicate staff were routinely offering R1 hydration. It is documented that on 7/24/2024, R1 refused to drink fluids, take medications, and refused to eat meals. Staff noticed the change in condition and contacted hospice and then sent R1 out to the hospital. R1 was hospitalized and diagnosed with failure to thrive. Therefore, there is no proof that staff were not ensuring resident was hydrated. Allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have hCDSS inspection report, May 28, 2025 · control 59-AS-20240730111657

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not providing incontinence care to resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct investigation into allegation listed above. During today’s inspection LPA met with Administrator Cathy Dustin to review the complaint findings. LPA investigated the allegation, “Facility staff are not providing incontinence care to resident”. During investigation LPA interviewed staff and witnesses and reviewed resident documentation. LPA interviewed administrator in which she stated R1 admitted to the facility independent and ambulatory. R1 then had a fall and started on hospice services. R1 began to decline, and caregivers were having a hard time providing incontinence care to R1. Administrator stated incontinence care was always provided, but recommended R1 move to a higher level of care because they only had 1 caregiver per shift. Continuation on 9099-C. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 22, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240702123620

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 15 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
15
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 742-5386
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Hampshire Manor Inc? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.