Hampshire Manor Inc is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville, Placer County, California — state license #317005563, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 14 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 17, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.
No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.
Since 2021, the state has visited this home 15 times and filed 14 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 17, 2026.
The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 22, 2024 to October 16, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.
Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.
What the state’s words mean
Apr 17, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Jan 15, 2026Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Dec 22, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Nov 12, 2025Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Oct 16, 2025Substantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from leaving the facility unassisted
Licensing Program Analysts Graham Gunby and Bethany Mirlohi arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver complaint findings into the allegations listed above and met with Administrator, Cathy Dustin. The purpose of the visit was explained, and the complaint investigation findings were discussed. *Continued on LIC9099-C* Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 16, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250612102414
Jul 25, 2025Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Residents briefs are not changed often enough/some staff "double-diaper". Staff do not receive adequate training to care for residents. Not enough staff to meet resident needs, Insufficient food supply. Residents may run out of medications. Residents may run out of adult briefs/diapers.
On 7/25/2025 LPA Tryon went to the facility unannounced to complete the complaint. LPA met with staff Kim Bao Tram Tran and spoke with Cathy Dustin by phone. LPA was able to interview one staff member at the visit. Over the course of the complaint, LPA has interviewed the administrator, four staff, toured the facility including common areas, bedrooms, kitchen, bathrooms, storage areas, and garage. Regarding resident briefs, staff related that they change residents on a regular basis, and that they are able to keep them pretty clean and dry overall. LPA only heard of one or two "double-diaper" occasions, which were some time ago. This appears to be going smoothly. Allegation is unfounded. Regarding staff training, all staff interviewed felt that they received plenty of training, and understand their jobs. LPA has reviewed training records. Allegation is unfounded. Regarding there not being enough staff to meet resident needs, staff generally admitted they are very busy, but that overallthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 25, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250304155656
May 28, 2025Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Staff spoke to residents in an inappropriate manner. Staff did not report incidents involving residents as required. Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident. Staff left residents soiled for extended periods. Licensee does not provide planned activities for residents. Licensee allowed staff to work prior to obtaining a criminal record clearance. Licensee did not ensure staff were appropriately trained to provide care to residents
LPA Tryon visited the facility on 5/28/2025 to deliver the findings for the complaint. LPA met with Administrator Cathy Dustin. Over the course of the investigation LPA has interviewed one witness, administrator, six staff, two residents, reviewed documents, toured the facility. Regarding the allegation that staff spoke to residents in an inappropriate manner, LPA finds that there is no credible evidence that any staff has spoken to residents in an inappropriate manner or in an otherwise disrespectful manner. Allegation is unfounded. Regarding the allegation that staff did not report incidents involving residents as required, LPA has not found evidence that a particular incident was not reported as required. Allegation is unfounded. Regarding the allegation that staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident, it appears that medical assistance has been sought as appropriate. LPA finds no proof that help was unnecessarily delayed in a particular instance. Allegation is unfouthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025 · control 59-AS-20240829145358
May 28, 2025Unfounded
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not ensure resident was hydrated resulting in hospitalization
LPA visited the facility on 5/28/2025 to deliver the findings of the complaint. LPA met with Administrator Cathy Dustin. Regarding allegation that facility staff did not ensure resident was hydrated resulting in hospitalization, through review of documentation it was learned that R1 had a history of urinary tract infections (UTI), and other medical conditions. There is no indication in the records that staff neglected or failed to keep R1 hydrated, fed, or mismanaged R1’s medications. Chart notes indicate staff were routinely offering R1 hydration. It is documented that on 7/24/2024, R1 refused to drink fluids, take medications, and refused to eat meals. Staff noticed the change in condition and contacted hospice and then sent R1 out to the hospital. R1 was hospitalized and diagnosed with failure to thrive. Therefore, there is no proof that staff were not ensuring resident was hydrated. Allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding of unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have hthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025 · control 59-AS-20240730111657
Dec 30, 2024Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Aug 22, 2024Unsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not providing incontinence care to resident
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct investigation into allegation listed above. During today’s inspection LPA met with Administrator Cathy Dustin to review the complaint findings. LPA investigated the allegation, “Facility staff are not providing incontinence care to resident”. During investigation LPA interviewed staff and witnesses and reviewed resident documentation. LPA interviewed administrator in which she stated R1 admitted to the facility independent and ambulatory. R1 then had a fall and started on hospice services. R1 began to decline, and caregivers were having a hard time providing incontinence care to R1. Administrator stated incontinence care was always provided, but recommended R1 move to a higher level of care because they only had 1 caregiver per shift. Continuation on 9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 22, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240702123620
Dec 6, 2023Report on file
Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.
Year-by-year trend
Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.
No Google listing is on file for this home. When one exists, its rating, review themes, and hours appear here — attributed to Google, never blended with the state record, and never part of how we rank homes.
This home hasn’t added its own details yet. When the operator claims this page, their photos, tour video, activities, languages, and staffing answers appear here — always labeled as theirs, never blended with the state record. Operators: claim your home, free →
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Is Hampshire Manor Inc licensed?
Yes — Hampshire Manor Inc is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville (Placer County): California license #317005563, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 14 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 17, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.
Can Hampshire Manor Inc care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?
From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Hampshire Manor Inc with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care and hospice care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.
From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.
What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE SIXTY AND OVER. FIRE CLEARANCE FOR FIVE (5) NON-AMBULATORY AND (1) BEDRIDDEN. ALLOWED UP TO THREE (3) HOSPICE RESIDENTS
How much does Hampshire Manor Inc cost?
California's public licensing record does not include Hampshire Manor Inc's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.
Does Hampshire Manor Inc accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?
Hampshire Manor Inc is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.
Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →
4 of 6 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on October 16, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.
What do state inspections show for Hampshire Manor Inc?
Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.
The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 15 state visits and 14 dated documents since 2021 for Hampshire Manor Inc; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 16, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.
Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.
2025
2024
Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.
What the state has logged
California has logged 15 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.
You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.
(916) 742-5386Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.
Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →
See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →
This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →
Do you run Hampshire Manor Inc? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.