Meadow Oaks Of Roseville is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville, Placer County, California — state license #317005900, licensed for 108 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 50 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 30, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

24 homes in view

Meadow Oaks Of Roseville

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 108 residents · Roseville, CA · Placer County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #317005900, held since 2016 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
930 Oak Ridge Rd · Roseville, Placer County
Phone
(916) 774-0200
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 18 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 12 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. LICENSED TO SERVE 108 RESIDENTS WHO MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 18. APPROVED DELAYED EGRESS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 56 times and filed 50 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 30, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 30, 2026
Occupancy at the August 30, 2024 visit
78 of 108 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 13 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 27, 2021 to August 30, 2024. 13 of the 13 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (8). 13 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 13 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 32 of 50 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 26, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202512 state visits · 13 documents
Dec 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 22, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202410 state visits · 12 documents
Dec 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 14, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 13, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that resident's bathroom was clean and sanitary.

On 8/30/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with Director, Jessica Sanders. LPA conducted records review and interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. LPA conducted visits on 6/18/24 and 8/30/24. On 6/18/24 R1 was unavailable for interview. R1 was interviewed today. The complaint was regarding an incident that occurred on 6/11/24 where R1 had a medical emergency and went to the hospital. At change of shift, while R1 was in the hospital, staff from the next shift was tasked with cleaning R1's bathroom. The bathroom was cleaned before R1 returned. In an interview with R1 on 8/30/24, R1 stated satisfaction with cleaning assistance provided for him and his room. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation maythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 30, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240612085306
Aug 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 3, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20233 state visits · 4 documents
Oct 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff who are not appropriately skilled professionals are administering medication to residents.

On 10/26/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver investigation finding. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Nathan Condie, and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with facility staff and reviewed pertinent documentation relevant to the allegation listed above such as resident's (R1) physician’s report, emergency contact, appraisals, assessments, doctor's orders, hospice communication logs, medication list, control substance management policy, staff roster, and residents roster. Continue on page LIC9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230717124435
Oct 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 14, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Staff did not provide incontinence care in a timely manner. - Staff did not attend to resident who was vomiting in a timely manner. - Staff did not redirect resident from wandering into bedrooms. - Staff did not answer the facility door for visitors.

On 9/14/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver investigation findings. LPA met with Assistant Executive Director (AED) Allison Lopez and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed pertinent documentation relevant to the allegation listed above such as residents’ physician’s report, emergency contact, appraisals, and assessments. Continue on page LIC9099-C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 14, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230510083840
Aug 30, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Insufficient staffing to meet residents' needs. - Staff verbally abusive towards residents.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced 08/30/2023 to deliver final finding for a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 05/05/2023. LPA met with Assistant Executive Director (AED), Allison Lopez, and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the complaint investigation the Department conducted interviews and obtained pertinent documents, such as residents’ (R1, R2, R3, & R4) physician's report, admission agreement, level of care assessments, medication list, medication administration records (MAR), facility resident roster, staff roster, facility’s call logs, call logs policy, staffs’ schedules for January through May 2023. Continued page LIC-9099C. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 30, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230505092304
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints5typical 2
Total complaints15typical 7
State visits on file56typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2016.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026330202512130202410120202389020228932021341
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

≈ $5,000–$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Placer County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 774-0200

Is Meadow Oaks Of Roseville licensed?

Yes — Meadow Oaks Of Roseville is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville (Placer County): California license #317005900, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 108 residents. State records list 50 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 30, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Meadow Oaks Of Roseville care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Meadow Oaks Of Roseville with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. LICENSED TO SERVE 108 RESIDENTS WHO MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 12 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 18. APPROVED DELAYED EGRESS.

How much does Meadow Oaks Of Roseville cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Meadow Oaks Of Roseville's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Meadow Oaks Of Roseville accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Meadow Oaks Of Roseville is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

78 of 108 beds occupied (72%) when the state visited on August 30, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Meadow Oaks Of Roseville?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 56 state visits and 50 dated documents since 2021 for Meadow Oaks Of Roseville; 13 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated August 30, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

13 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that resident's bathroom was clean and sanitary.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 8/30/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with Director, Jessica Sanders. LPA conducted records review and interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. LPA conducted visits on 6/18/24 and 8/30/24. On 6/18/24 R1 was unavailable for interview. R1 was interviewed today. The complaint was regarding an incident that occurred on 6/11/24 where R1 had a medical emergency and went to the hospital. At change of shift, while R1 was in the hospital, staff from the next shift was tasked with cleaning R1's bathroom. The bathroom was cleaned before R1 returned. In an interview with R1 on 8/30/24, R1 stated satisfaction with cleaning assistance provided for him and his room. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may— CDSS inspection report, August 30, 2024 · control 59-AS-20240612085306

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff who are not appropriately skilled professionals are administering medication to residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/26/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver investigation finding. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Nathan Condie, and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with facility staff and reviewed pertinent documentation relevant to the allegation listed above such as resident's (R1) physician’s report, emergency contact, appraisals, assessments, doctor's orders, hospice communication logs, medication list, control substance management policy, staff roster, and residents roster. Continue on page LIC9099-C. Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, October 26, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230717124435
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Staff did not provide incontinence care in a timely manner. - Staff did not attend to resident who was vomiting in a timely manner. - Staff did not redirect resident from wandering into bedrooms. - Staff did not answer the facility door for visitors.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 9/14/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver investigation findings. LPA met with Assistant Executive Director (AED) Allison Lopez and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, LPA conducted interviews and reviewed pertinent documentation relevant to the allegation listed above such as residents’ physician’s report, emergency contact, appraisals, and assessments. Continue on page LIC9099-C. Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, September 14, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230510083840
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Insufficient staffing to meet residents' needs. - Staff verbally abusive towards residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced 08/30/2023 to deliver final finding for a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 05/05/2023. LPA met with Assistant Executive Director (AED), Allison Lopez, and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the complaint investigation the Department conducted interviews and obtained pertinent documents, such as residents’ (R1, R2, R3, & R4) physician's report, admission agreement, level of care assessments, medication list, medication administration records (MAR), facility resident roster, staff roster, facility’s call logs, call logs policy, staffs’ schedules for January through May 2023. Continued page LIC-9099C. Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, August 30, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230505092304
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not adhere to resident's admissions agreement.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced 02/10/2023 to deliver final finding for a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 10/04/2022. LPA met with Assistant Executive Director (AED), Allison Lopez, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. Additionally, LPA was screened by facility staff upon entering the facility. Throughout the course of the complaint investigation the Department conducted interviews and obtained pertinent documents, such as resident’s (R1) physician's report, admission agreement, identification and emergency information, level of care assessments, medication list, medication administration records (MAR), facility resident roster, staff roster, and facility’s call logs. Continued on page LIC-9099C. Unfounded— CDSS inspection report, February 10, 2023 · control 25-AS-20221004182219

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not refund as specify on Admission Agreement.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced 12/28/2022 to deliver final finding for a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 04/13/2022. LPA met with Assistant Executive Director (AED), Allison Lopez, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. Additionally, LPA was screened by facility staff upon entering the facility. Throughout the course of the complaint investigation the Department conducted interviews and obtained pertinent documents, such as resident’s (R1) physician's report, level of care assessments, discharge medical documents, 30-day notice, R1 and R2 ledgers, copy of refund check, unusual/ injury incident reports, R1’s admission agreement, and email communication between R1’s responsible party (RP) and facility. Continued on page LIC-9099C. Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, December 28, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220705110233
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is not changed and bedroom smells of urine.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced 12/08/2022. LPA met with Resident Care Director, Allison Lopez, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. Additionally, LPA was screened by facility staff upon entering the facility. Throughout the course of the complaint investigation the Department conducted interviews and obtained pertinent documents, such as residents’ physician's report, level of care assessments, medication administration record (MAR), and medication list. Continued on page LIC-9099C. Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, December 8, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220413110121
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident with hygiene needs. Resident was not provided with adequate incontinence care. Staff left the facility and residents were left unattended. Staff did not provide adequate food service to residents. Resident sustained pressure sores due to lack of care and supervision. Facility is in despair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced on 8/17/2022 to deliver complaint findings for a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 02/02/2022. LPA met with Administrator, Debra Duval, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. Additionally, LPA was screened by facility staff upon entering the facility. Throughout the course of the complaint investigation the Department conducted interviews and obtained pertinent documents, such as residents’ physician's report, level of care assessment, emergency contact, and photographs. Continue on page LIC-9099C. Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, August 17, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220202093531
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have adequate staffing to meet residents' needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced on 04/07/2022 to deliver a complaint finding for a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 10/13/2021. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Debra Duval, and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms. LPA arrived at the facility and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. Additionally, LPA were screened by facility staff upon entering the facility. Throughout the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and reviewed pertinent documentation relevant to the allegation listed above such as R1’s Physician’s Report, PRN Authorization Letter— CDSS inspection report, April 7, 2022 · control 25-AS-20211013124652
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Resident was physically abuse while in care. - Staff failed to treat resident with dignity and respect.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This is an amended report which is reflected on the 9099-D. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced on 1/21/2022 to deliver a complaint finding for a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 12/18/2020. LPA met with Executive Director, Debra Duval, and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms and contacted licensee and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: N-95 Mask. Additionally, LPA were screened by facility staff upon entering the facility. Throughout the course of the complaint investigation the Department conducted interviews and obtained pertinent documents relevant to the allegation listed above. The Dep— CDSS inspection report, January 21, 2022 · control 27-AS-20201218135459

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 56 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
15
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
56
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 774-0200
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Meadow Oaks Of Roseville? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.