Millport Villas is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville, Placer County, California — state license #315920211, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 7 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2024, the most recent dated October 23, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

34 homes in view

Millport Villas

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Roseville, CA · Placer County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #315920211, held since 2024 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
7641 Millport Drive · Roseville, Placer County
Phone
(916) 472-6669
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDROOM #6 APPROVED FOR A BEDRIDDEN. BEDROOMS #1-5 APPROVED FOR NON- AMBULATORY. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (6).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2024, the state has visited this home 9 times and filed 7 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on October 23, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
October 23, 2025
Occupancy at that visit
5 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 23, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 7 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20253 state visits · 5 documents
Oct 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff interacts with resident in an inappropriate manner

On 10/23/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with caregiver/ designee Scvonda Peters- Robertsaon. LPA conducted records review and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. Regarding staff interactions with R1, interviewes of R1 and caregivers found varying accounts of events. No other residents or impartial witnesses were identified nor stated similar concerns regarding staff interactions. LPA reviewed shift notes and activity schedule sheets for R1. LPA requests copies of all shift and activity notes be copied to LPA by 10/27/25. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Ethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250828085730
Oct 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not have planned activities for a resident Staff are mistreating a resident

On 10/23/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with designee. LPA conducted records review and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. Records found that R1 is not diagnosed with cognitive disability. R1 is dependent on others for physical assist from bed by a 2-person hoyer lift. Interviews and records showed that facility staff have tried to plan with R1 to insure 2 staff are available for care and activities. Staff report R1 regularly refuses activies when staff are available at agreed upon times. R1 states that assisance is not offered as claimed by staff. R1 statements of mistreatment by staff are in conflict with staff reports of R's behavior. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation maythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251006093136
Oct 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff refusing to pick up resident’s medication.

On 10/23/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly LPA Mknelly arrived and met with designee to deliver investigation findings. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records, and conducted interviews. LPA finds that facility met Tittle 22 requirements. R1 was reportedly requested to ask family to pick-up medciations. Medciation supply had not run out at that time. Family did pick-up R1 pain meds and gave them to R1. R1 is designated by their physician as being capable to administrer PRN medications and is not self administering pair medication. Facility staff picked up and centrally stored R1's additional medication. R1 did not have any missed medication due to lack of availablilty. This agency has investigated the above complaint allegations. We have found that the complaint is UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. Exit interview conducted and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 23, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251007163437
Sep 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 13, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 1, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints0typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file9typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2024.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20253502024220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Placer County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 472-6669

Is Millport Villas licensed?

Yes — Millport Villas is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville (Placer County): California license #315920211, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 7 inspection and complaint documents since 2024; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated October 23, 2025, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Millport Villas care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Millport Villas with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDROOM #6 APPROVED FOR A BEDRIDDEN. BEDROOMS #1-5 APPROVED FOR NON- AMBULATORY. WAIVER/GRANTED FOR HOSPICE CARE FOR (6).

How much does Millport Villas cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Millport Villas's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Millport Villas accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Millport Villas is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 6 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on October 23, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Millport Villas?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 9 state visits and 7 dated documents since 2024 for Millport Villas; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 23, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff interacts with resident in an inappropriate manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/23/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with caregiver/ designee Scvonda Peters- Robertsaon. LPA conducted records review and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. Regarding staff interactions with R1, interviewes of R1 and caregivers found varying accounts of events. No other residents or impartial witnesses were identified nor stated similar concerns regarding staff interactions. LPA reviewed shift notes and activity schedule sheets for R1. LPA requests copies of all shift and activity notes be copied to LPA by 10/27/25. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. ECDSS inspection report, October 23, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250828085730
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not have planned activities for a resident Staff are mistreating a resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/23/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with designee. LPA conducted records review and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. Records found that R1 is not diagnosed with cognitive disability. R1 is dependent on others for physical assist from bed by a 2-person hoyer lift. Interviews and records showed that facility staff have tried to plan with R1 to insure 2 staff are available for care and activities. Staff report R1 regularly refuses activies when staff are available at agreed upon times. R1 states that assisance is not offered as claimed by staff. R1 statements of mistreatment by staff are in conflict with staff reports of R's behavior. As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (US)Unsubstantiated - A finding that the complaint is Unsubstantiated means that although the allegation mayCDSS inspection report, October 23, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251006093136
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff refusing to pick up resident’s medication.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 10/23/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly LPA Mknelly arrived and met with designee to deliver investigation findings. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records, and conducted interviews. LPA finds that facility met Tittle 22 requirements. R1 was reportedly requested to ask family to pick-up medciations. Medciation supply had not run out at that time. Family did pick-up R1 pain meds and gave them to R1. R1 is designated by their physician as being capable to administrer PRN medications and is not self administering pair medication. Facility staff picked up and centrally stored R1's additional medication. R1 did not have any missed medication due to lack of availablilty. This agency has investigated the above complaint allegations. We have found that the complaint is UNFOUNDED, meaning that the allegation was false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. We have therefore dismissed the complaint. Exit interview conducted and report provided.CDSS inspection report, October 23, 2025 · control 59-AS-20251007163437

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 9 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
9
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 472-6669
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Millport Villas? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.