Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Rock Creek Senior Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·Rocklin, California

Licensed since 2018Licence #312700212
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · HospiceState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$5,000 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,200
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Room at the last state visit3 of 6 beds occupiedFebruary 18, 2026 · not a current opening
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitFebruary 18, 2026CDSS inspection record

Rock Creek Senior Care is a small care home in Rocklin — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents since 2018. Bedridden care is not on file.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Rock Creek Senior Care

Is Rock Creek Senior Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Rock Creek Senior Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Rock Creek Senior Care been cited?

3 Type A and 0 Type B citations since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. Those records count 10 state visits over the same years.

Is Rock Creek Senior Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Rock Creek Senior Care cost?

$5,000 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,100–$6,200. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 17 other homes of a similar licensed size across Placer County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $3,900 to $6,000 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 17 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Rock Creek Senior Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Rock Creek Senior Care LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Sutter Roseville Medical Center is 2.6 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Rock Creek Senior Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Rock Creek Senior Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ROCK CREEK SENIOR CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #312700212. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Rock Creek Senior Care LLC, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 10 state inspection visits since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 3 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. The same records count 10 state visits in that period.
  • 2 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2018, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is February 18, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenNot on file · ask the home

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER, 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE FOR 6.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Medicines

    Level of medication service: reminders only

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

    caring.com · 2026-09-09

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

2 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

Care & day-to-day support

These are the home’s own statements about its day-to-day practice — they are not part of the state licensing record, and the state has not approved or reviewed them.

  • Works with hospice

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

  • Level of medication serviceReminders only

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,000a month to start

Likely $4,100–$6,200

From 14 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$5,000a month

Likely $4,100–$6,350

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$5,000likely $4,100–$6,200

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,100–$6,350
$5,000
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,800–$9,450
$7,000
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

14 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$5,800.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 14 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 6408 Mendez Creek Ct, Rocklin, CA 95765Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2021, the state has filed 8 documents for this home, and its records count 10 visits since 2018. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on February 18, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2021
State visits
10
Most recent visit
February 18, 2026
Occupied at that visit
3 of 6 bedsa count on that day, not an opening

We hold 3 complaint reports the state published for this home, dated October 28, 2022 to February 18, 2026. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 3 complaint reports below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations3typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations3typical 0
  • Total complaints2typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this licence since 2018.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025110202333020221112021110

The last 36 months — 4 of 8 documents

20262 state visits · 2 documents
Feb 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff physically assulted a resident causing injury resulting in hospitalization

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived unannounced on 02/18/2026 to complete and deliver findings to a complaint received on 09/09/2025. LPA met with Administrator, Carmen Balint and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the investigation, the department conducted interviews and record reviews. Please continue to LIC9099C.. Unsubstantiated Allegation: Staff physically assulted a resident causing injury resulting in hospitalization On 09/06/2025, R1 was admitted to Sutter Roseville Medical Center for complaint of left foot pain. An MRI confirmed moderate second proximal phalangeal bone marrow edema and severe second phalangeal bone marrow edema suspicious for osteomyelitis. Doctors subsequently amputated R1’s left index toe. R1 reported that a caregiver, S2, intentionally hit the toe with a standing lift. No other information contained in the medical records indicates that R1’s toe wound resulted from an intentional impact with an object like a standing lift. Historically, R1 suffered from foot cellulitis related to their diabetes diagnosis. Prior to their hospitalization, R1 received regular wound care treatment from InnovAge for various preexisting pressure wounds to their left foot. There was no indication of a left index toe injury until 04/22/2025 when redness was observed on the top of R1’s left index toe; however, the toe injury was not concerning until an open wound was observed on 08/14/2025. S2 denied the allegation to the Rocklin Police Department and the Investigations Branch and stated that R1 often threatened to have them terminated. On 09/04/2025, S2 told facility Administration that R1 threatened to report them and tell lies that would “spread like wildfire.” S2 subsequently documented the interaction in a handwritten letter. No other residents reported similar allegations against S2. R2 claimed to have been close with R1 and R1 expressed their frustrations related to the facility. R2 indicated that R1 never mentioned any physical abuse by S2 or another caregiver. Based on interviews conducted by the Department and records review, the preponderance of evidence standards has not been met. Therefore, the above allegation is found to be UNSUBSTANTIATED. A finding that a complaint allegation is unsubstantiated means that although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is not a preponderance of the evidence to prove that the alleged violation occurred. Exit interview conducted and report provided. Allegation: Staff verbally abusing resident Interview conducted with staff member S1 indicated that staff members haven’t been heard being verbally abusive towards residents in care. R2 indicated that there are times when they have to elevate their voices due to residents not being able to hear (due to hearing loss) or understand the staff correctly. Interviews with R2 indicated that staff are helpful at all times and have not heard any staff verbally abusing residents in care. Allegation: Facility failed to meet reporting requirements LPA interviewed staff and reviewed facility information. Through interviews S1 stated when an incident occurs the staff writes a report and then sends the information to management. The management team reviews the information and creates an incident report. Administrator stated if needed they will send incident report into CCL. LPA reviewed incident reports sent into CCL and found facility is sending in incident reports throughout the year on incidents that have occurred with residents in care. The allegation is UNFOUNDED. A finding that the allegation is unfounded means that the allegation is false, could not have happened, and/or is without a reasonable basis. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 18, 2026 · control 59-AS-20250909171014
Jan 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Graham Gunby arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA met with Administrator, Carmen Balint, and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA and Administrator conducted a tour of the interior and exterior of the facility. Areas toured include but not limited to resident bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, common areas and backyard. LPA observed required furniture, and lighting throughout the residents' bedrooms and facility. LPA observed residents' bathrooms to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair. LPA observed food supplies of non-perishables for a minimum of seven (7) days and perishable foods for a minimum of two (2) days. Toxins and cleaning supplies are locked and inaccessible to residents in care. The hot water temperature was measured in the kitchen sink at 113.3 degrees Fahrenheit. LPA observed fire detectors and carbon monoxide alarms to be operable. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen and was last serviced on 09/30/25. LPA observed required Licensing posters posted in the entry of the facility. LPA observed medications to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA reviewed three (3) resident files. Resident files contained all required documentation. LPA reviewed three (3) staff records. Staff have all required documentation and first aid training. No deficiencies are being cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted and a copy of the report will be emailed to Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 20, 2026
20251 state visit · 1 document
Jan 14, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

LPA Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced annual visit. This facility has six private resident rooms. One private room is to the right of the main entrance. The rest of the resident rooms and two common bathrooms are located to the left of the facility down a hallway. The entrance of the facility leads to an open floor plan that has the kitchen, dining, and sitting area. There is a locked storage closet for medications and records in the kitchen area. There locked laundry room and caregiver room in a nook area in the kitchen. The garage is only accessible from the outside and is used for storage. The backyard was inspected. There is a gate on both sides of the facility. -two staff records were reviewed -three resident records were reviewed -multiple topics were discussed The following shall be updated and submitted to Community Care Licensing by the end of the month: -LIC 500 facility personnel or staff schedule -LIC 610 emergency disaster plan -LIC 308 designation of administrative responsibility No citations were issuethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 14, 2025
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 14, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

On 12/14/2023 at 9:30 AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a Required-1 Year Inspection utilizing the inspection tool. LPA met with staff and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA requested for staff to notify administrator, Carmenuta Balint, of LPA's presence at the facility. Administrator arrived at a later time. At 10:00 AM, LPA reviewed a total of four (4) resident files. Resident files contain signed admission agreements, physician's reports, appraisals, identification sheets, releases, and resident's rights. Medications are centrally stored, locked, and appear to be given per doctor order. LPA compared medications to those being given for four (4) residents and found no discrepancies. Facility is correctly using the Medication Administration Records (MAR). LPA reviewed a total of two (2) staff record. Staff has training in medications, first aid and CPR, and other various areas of care provision. At 10:30 AM, LPA and administrator toured the interior and exterior of the facility to ensure health and safety of residents in care. Areas toured include but are not limited to: common areas, residents' bedrooms, bathrooms, kitchen, garage, laundry room, and backyard. LPA observed required furniture, and lighting throughout the residents' bedrooms and facility. LPA observed residents' bathrooms to be clean, sanitary, and in good repair. LPA observed food supplies of non-perishables for a minimum of one (1) week and perishable foods for a minimum of two (2) days. Toxic and cleaning supplies locked and is inaccessible to residents in care. The hot water temperature was measured in the kitchen at 112 degrees Fahrenheit. First aid kit was completed. LPA observed fire detectors and carbon monoxide alarms to be operable. The fire extinguisher was last serviced on 11/1/2022. Fire drill was last conducted on 09/13/2023. LPA observed medications to be locked and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed required Licensing posters posted throughout the facility. No deficiencies being cited during today's inspection. Exit interview conducted and report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 14, 2023
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

Find a detail about life at this home.

Rooms & the spaces they will use

  • Room typesAll Private Rooms

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Pets, routines & independence

  • Residents may bring a petReported no

    Reported on caring.com · seen September 9, 2026.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Placer County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Placer County