Blessed Homecare 2 Roseville is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville, Placer County, California — state license #315002812, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 25 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 17, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

17 homes in view

Blessed Homecare 2 Roseville

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Roseville, CA · Placer County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #315002812, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
4100 Shorthorn Way · Roseville, Placer County
Phone
(209) 834-4040
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 4 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (6) NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (4).State service designations935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 25 times and filed 25 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 17, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unfounded.”

Most recent state visit
June 17, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
5 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 5, 2023 to June 17, 2026. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (3). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 22 of 25 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Resident has injuries of unknown origin

Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Licensee Baby Quintero to deliver findings for the above complaint allegation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260512163158
20258 state visits · 10 documents
Oct 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not ensuring that resident is administered their medications according to physician's instructions. Staff are mismanaging resident's medications.

Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Laura Munoz arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Administrator Baby Quintero to deliver findings for the above complaint allegations. During the investigation, LPA and LPM conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 28, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250513102052
May 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff are physically abusing residents in care Staff are financially abusing residents in care Staff do not allow residents access to phone Staff do not allow residents access to their doctors

On 04/02/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak and Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver final findings to a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 01/24/2025. LPA met with Licensee Baby Quintero and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and record review. Please continue to LIC9099-C Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250124130413
Mar 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 9 documents
Nov 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident able to leave the facility unnoticed by staff. Facility did not contact 9-1-1 timely regarding resident leaving the facility unnoticed Facility is obstructing fire exits.

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Hiratsuka and Mikkelson, conducted this unannounced complaint visit. LPAs interviewed Caregivers and Licensee Baby Quintero via the phone. LPAs toured the facility and reviewed resident files. On 10/21/2024, a resident was able to leave the facility without staff noticing. The resident is a known wander risk. The facility staff were assisting other residents when the one left out the side gate. The facility has audio alerts on the doors as required by Title 22 Regulations if exiting poses a risk to residents and in this case exiting does pose a risk to residents but the audio alerts were turned off due to the batteries not working. The facility also does not have a staffing plan to address the issue of two residents who make attempts to leave the facility. The two residents were determined by their doctors to not be able to leave the facility unassisted. This is a $500.00 immediatel civil penalty because the resident was able to leave the facility unnothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 24, 2024 · control 59-AS-20241022104408
Oct 24, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 2, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: . Staff are restricting resident visits 2. Staff do not ensure that resident is appropriately dressed 3. Staff isolate resident in his room 4. Staff do not prevent visitors from posting resident confidential information in the facility 5. Staff mask medication in resident's food 6. Staff did not provide a bed that met the resident's needs 7. Furniture in the resident's room violates the facility fire clearance 8. Staff prohibit resident from eating without assistance from staff

LPA Hiratsuka, conducted this unannounced complaint visit to deliver the results into the allegations above. LPA reviewed resident files and conducted interviews with responsible party, Licensee, one staff, and two witnesses. 1. The resident has a conservator who has paperwork that states they may restrict vistations. Staff stated they do not restrict visitors. 2. LPA interviewed resident in question. Resident stated they do not want to wear certain clothing items at all times. LPA interviewed responsible party and two witnesses and all stated the resident does not want to wear certain clothing items and they have the right to refuse and to wear what they want. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230912152259
Sep 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations5typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints5typical 0
Total complaints5typical 0
State visits on file25typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202581012024591202322020221102021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Placer County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (209) 834-4040

Is Blessed Homecare 2 Roseville licensed?

Yes — Blessed Homecare 2 Roseville is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville (Placer County): California license #315002812, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 25 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 17, 2026, was marked “Unfounded” by the state.

Can Blessed Homecare 2 Roseville care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Blessed Homecare 2 Roseville with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR (6) NON-AMBULATORY. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR (4).

How much does Blessed Homecare 2 Roseville cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Blessed Homecare 2 Roseville's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Blessed Homecare 2 Roseville accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Blessed Homecare 2 Roseville is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 6 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on June 17, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Blessed Homecare 2 Roseville?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 25 state visits and 25 dated documents since 2021 for Blessed Homecare 2 Roseville; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 17, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident has injuries of unknown origin
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Licensee Baby Quintero to deliver findings for the above complaint allegation. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, June 17, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260512163158

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not ensuring that resident is administered their medications according to physician's instructions. Staff are mismanaging resident's medications.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensed Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Laura Munoz arrived at the facility unannounced and met with Administrator Baby Quintero to deliver findings for the above complaint allegations. During the investigation, LPA and LPM conducted interviews, conducted a tour of the facility, and reviewed documentation pertinent to the investigation. The results of the investigation are as follows: *** Report continued on 9099-C*** SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 28, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250513102052
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are physically abusing residents in care Staff are financially abusing residents in care Staff do not allow residents access to phone Staff do not allow residents access to their doctors
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 04/02/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cheyenne Ratajczak and Cassandra Mikkelson arrived at the facility unannounced to deliver final findings to a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 01/24/2025. LPA met with Licensee Baby Quintero and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, the Department conducted interviews and record review. Please continue to LIC9099-C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, April 2, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250124130413

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident able to leave the facility unnoticed by staff. Facility did not contact 9-1-1 timely regarding resident leaving the facility unnoticed Facility is obstructing fire exits.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Hiratsuka and Mikkelson, conducted this unannounced complaint visit. LPAs interviewed Caregivers and Licensee Baby Quintero via the phone. LPAs toured the facility and reviewed resident files. On 10/21/2024, a resident was able to leave the facility without staff noticing. The resident is a known wander risk. The facility staff were assisting other residents when the one left out the side gate. The facility has audio alerts on the doors as required by Title 22 Regulations if exiting poses a risk to residents and in this case exiting does pose a risk to residents but the audio alerts were turned off due to the batteries not working. The facility also does not have a staffing plan to address the issue of two residents who make attempts to leave the facility. The two residents were determined by their doctors to not be able to leave the facility unassisted. This is a $500.00 immediatel civil penalty because the resident was able to leave the facility unnoCDSS inspection report, October 24, 2024 · control 59-AS-20241022104408

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 25 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
5
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
25
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Blessed Homecare 2 Roseville?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Blessed Homecare Llc, who operates 3 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(209) 834-4040
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Blessed Homecare 2 Roseville? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.