Brookdale Roseville is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville, Placer County, California — state license #315001843, licensed for 40 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 14 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 2, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

21 homes in view

Brookdale Roseville

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 40 residents · Roseville, CA · Placer County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #315001843, held since 2006 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1 Somer Ridge Dr · Roseville, Placer County
Phone
(916) 773-5955
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 40 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 6 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR FORTY (40) NON-AMBULATORY IN WHICH SIX (6) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER/HOSPICE APPROVED FOR TEN (10). NEW MANAGEMENT CO (VISTA ROSEVILLE SENIOR LIVING INC) EFFECTIVE 4/1/2026.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 17 times and filed 14 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 2, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 2, 2026
Occupancy at the October 3, 2023 visit
14 of 40 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated November 16, 2021 to October 3, 2023. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (5). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 7 of 14 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jun 2, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 11, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Aug 8, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 18, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20232 state visits · 2 documents
Nov 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 3, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: - Resident sustained an injury due to staff neglect. - Staff left hazardous item accessible to residents in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced 10/03/2023 to deliver final finding for a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 02/16/2023. LPA met with Executive Director, Janelle Douglas, and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the complaint investigation the Department conducted interviews and obtained pertinent documents, such as resident’s (R1) physician's report, admission agreement, unusual incident/injury report, medical records, personal service plan, care profile, progress notes, temporary service plan wound, and transmission. Continued page LIC-9099C. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2023 · control 25-AS-20230210141515
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 1
Type B citations4typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints5typical 7
State visits on file17typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2006.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202611020252202024220202344220224422021111
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

≈ $5,000–$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Placer County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 773-5955

Is Brookdale Roseville licensed?

Yes — Brookdale Roseville is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville (Placer County): California license #315001843, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 40 residents. State records list 14 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 2, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Brookdale Roseville care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Brookdale Roseville with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR FORTY (40) NON-AMBULATORY IN WHICH SIX (6) MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. WAIVER/HOSPICE APPROVED FOR TEN (10). NEW MANAGEMENT CO (VISTA ROSEVILLE SENIOR LIVING INC) EFFECTIVE 4/1/2026.

How much does Brookdale Roseville cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Brookdale Roseville's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Brookdale Roseville accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Brookdale Roseville is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

14 of 40 beds occupied (35%) when the state visited on October 3, 2023. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Brookdale Roseville?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 17 state visits and 14 dated documents since 2021 for Brookdale Roseville; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated October 3, 2023, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewed- Resident sustained an injury due to staff neglect. - Staff left hazardous item accessible to residents in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced 10/03/2023 to deliver final finding for a complaint Community Care Licensing (CCL) received on 02/16/2023. LPA met with Executive Director, Janelle Douglas, and explained the purpose of the visit. Throughout the course of the complaint investigation the Department conducted interviews and obtained pertinent documents, such as resident’s (R1) physician's report, admission agreement, unusual incident/injury report, medical records, personal service plan, care profile, progress notes, temporary service plan wound, and transmission. Continued page LIC-9099C. Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, October 3, 2023 · control 25-AS-20230210141515
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide all of residents records to resident's authorized representative.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 02/22/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced to commence a complaint investigation into allegation listed above. LPA met with Executive Director (ED), Morgan Whinery, and discussed the elements of the allegation. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. During the course of investigation, the Department interviewed ED and obtained pertinent documents relevant to the complainit investigation such as, authorization for release of records, affidavit custodian of records, letter of request from law group, and email communications. Continue on page LIC9099-C. Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, February 22, 2023 · control 25-AS-20230216085506

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not answer communications promptly and appropriately to the resident's representatives.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced on 10/04/2022 to commence a complaint investigation. LPA discussed the elements of the allegation with Reigonal Nurse, Robyn Moore. LPA ensured he applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. During the course of investigation, the Department interviewed facility staff and obtained pertinent documents relevant to the complainit investigation such as, resident roster and authorization for release of records form from the facility. Continue on page LIC9099-C. Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, October 4, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220928132255
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not answer communications promptly and appropriately to the resident's representatives.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced on 09/22/2022 to commence a complaint investigation. LPA discussed the elements of the allegation with Executive Director, Chantal Salinas. LPA ensured he applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: surgical mask. Additionally, LPA was screened by facility staff upon entering the facility. During the course of investigation, the Department interviewed facility staff and obtained pertinent documents relevant to the complainit investigation such as, resident roster and authorization for release of records form from the facility. Continue on page LIC9099-C. Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, September 22, 2022 · control 25-AS-20220920164544

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not safeguard resident's personal property and did not reimburse resident for lost property.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sarena Keosavang arrived at the facility unannounced on 11/16/2021 to conduct complaint investigation. LPA met with Executive Director, Sherrie Kuar, and explained the purpose of the visit. Prior to initiating the visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms and contacted licensee and completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. Additionally, LPA were screened by facility staff upon entering the facility. Throughout the course of complaint investigation, the Department conducted interviews and obtained documents such as LIC 621 client/resident personal property and valuables and copies of check inquiry summary. ***************************************** Continue on page LIC 809-C ***********— CDSS inspection report, November 16, 2021 · control 25-AS-20210903112301

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 17 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
17
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 773-5955
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Brookdale Roseville? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.