Silvana Senior Care 2 is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville, Placer County, California — state license #312700958, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 15 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated July 1, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

13 homes in view

Silvana Senior Care 2

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Roseville, CA · Placer County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #312700958, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1245 Crescendo Dr · Roseville, Placer County
Phone
(916) 586-4713
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX(6).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 15 times and filed 15 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated July 1, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 1, 2026
Occupancy at the April 1, 2026 visit
5 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 3, 2021 to April 1, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 15 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 4 documents
Jul 1, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 14, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 1, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not refund authorized representative after resident passed away

On (date), Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to Administrator,s designee, to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA also spoke with Admistrator by phone. LPA reviewed resident records, and conducted and interview of the Administrator. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. Records and interviews found that R1 passed away 4 days after admission and was receiving hospice care. R1 was admitted on 1/25/26 and passed away on 1/28/26. Belongings were removed from the home on 1/28/26 so R1 was a resident for 4 days. Administrator acknowledged that refund fees have not yet been paid As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (B) This poses a potential Health and Safetythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 1, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260324135409
Feb 10, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20254 state visits · 4 documents
Nov 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not respect resident’s choices regarding their care needs. Staff did not ensure resident had the ability to request assistance when needed. Staff did not respond to resident’s request for assistance with care needs in a timely manner. Staff did not dispense medication according to doctor’s orders. Staff did not provide adequate personal hygiene care to resident. Staff did not follow proper personal hygiene protocols. Licensee did not ensure facility was free from pests. Staff did not ensure mats provided to residents maintained slip-resistant properties. Licensee did not provide planned activities for residents.

On 10/21/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with designee. Administrator was informed of the visit by phone. LPA conducted records review , facility inspection and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. Specific to the allegations pertaining to R1: Staff did not respect resident’s choices regarding their care needs; Staff did not ensure resident had the ability to request assistance when needed; Staff did not respond to resident’s request for assistance with care needs in a timely manner; Staff did not dispense medication according to doctor’s orders; Staff did not provide adequate personal hygiene care to resident; and, Staff did not follow proper personal hygiene protocols, additional corroborating eveidence was not found during this investigation. Report continued... Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 22, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250708140603
Jul 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Jun 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations2typical 0
Substantiated complaints2typical 0
Total complaints4typical 0
State visits on file15typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202644120254402024110202312020221102021231
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Placer County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 586-4713

Is Silvana Senior Care 2 licensed?

Yes — Silvana Senior Care 2 is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville (Placer County): California license #312700958, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 15 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated July 1, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Silvana Senior Care 2 care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Silvana Senior Care 2 with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX(6).

How much does Silvana Senior Care 2 cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Silvana Senior Care 2's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Silvana Senior Care 2 accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Silvana Senior Care 2 is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 6 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on April 1, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Silvana Senior Care 2?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 15 state visits and 15 dated documents since 2021 for Silvana Senior Care 2; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 1, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not refund authorized representative after resident passed away
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On (date), Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly spoke to Administrator,s designee, to deliver complaint findings for the above allegation. LPA also spoke with Admistrator by phone. LPA reviewed resident records, and conducted and interview of the Administrator. LPA finds that the allegations cited above are substantiated. Records and interviews found that R1 passed away 4 days after admission and was receiving hospice care. R1 was admitted on 1/25/26 and passed away on 1/28/26. Belongings were removed from the home on 1/28/26 so R1 was a resident for 4 days. Administrator acknowledged that refund fees have not yet been paid As a result of this investigation, LPA finds allegation to be (S) Substantiated - A finding that the complaint is Substantiated means that the allegation is valid because the preponderance of the evidence standard has been met. The following deficiencies were cited on 9099-D, per Title 22 Regulations, Division 6. (B) This poses a potential Health and SafetyCDSS inspection report, April 1, 2026 · control 59-AS-20260324135409

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not respect resident’s choices regarding their care needs. Staff did not ensure resident had the ability to request assistance when needed. Staff did not respond to resident’s request for assistance with care needs in a timely manner. Staff did not dispense medication according to doctor’s orders. Staff did not provide adequate personal hygiene care to resident. Staff did not follow proper personal hygiene protocols. Licensee did not ensure facility was free from pests. Staff did not ensure mats provided to residents maintained slip-resistant properties. Licensee did not provide planned activities for residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 10/21/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit to deliver the findings for the above allegations and met with designee. Administrator was informed of the visit by phone. LPA conducted records review , facility inspection and extensive interviews. LPA is unable to find and or meet the preponderance, per policy. Specific to the allegations pertaining to R1: Staff did not respect resident’s choices regarding their care needs; Staff did not ensure resident had the ability to request assistance when needed; Staff did not respond to resident’s request for assistance with care needs in a timely manner; Staff did not dispense medication according to doctor’s orders; Staff did not provide adequate personal hygiene care to resident; and, Staff did not follow proper personal hygiene protocols, additional corroborating eveidence was not found during this investigation. Report continued... UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 22, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250708140603

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResidents are chemically restrained with medication Facility staff not fingerprint-cleared Staff are using drugs while on duty Facility staff are abusing residents
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bethany Mirlohi arrived unannounced to continue investigation into allegations listed above. LPA met with administrator Krisztina Ivascu during today's inspection. LPA investigated allegation, "Residents are chemically restrained with medication". LPA reviewed 6 of 6 resident medications, comparing with physician orders. LPA observed all medications ordered were present at the facility. Administrator stated all medications are dispensed as ordered by the physician and medications are never given to chemically restrain residents. LPA interviewed 2 of 6 residents that were able to be interviewed, and residents reported they are given their correct medications daily. Due to the information gathered LPA finds allegation to be UNFOUNDED. Continuation on 9099-C. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, June 1, 2023 · control 59-AS-20230328164444

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 15 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
15
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 586-4713
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Silvana Senior Care 2? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.