Heavenly Angels is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville, Placer County, California — state license #312700314, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 10 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated September 9, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

38 homes in view

Heavenly Angels

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Roseville, CA · Placer County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #312700314, held since 2018 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
6152 Great Basin Drive · Roseville, Placer County
Phone
(916) 865-4150
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 4 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 4 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
LICENSED FOR SIX(6) ADULTS OVER SIXTY(60), OF WHICH FOUR(4) MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FOUR(4).State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 10 times and filed 10 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on September 9, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unfounded.”

Most recent state visit
September 9, 2025
Occupancy at the September 22, 2021 visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 2 documents with transcribed findings, dated September 22, 2021 to September 9, 2025. 2 of the 2 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Unfounded” (2). 2 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 2 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 3 of 10 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 9, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff retained a resident with a prohibited health condition Due to staff neglect, resident sustained a pressure injury Due to staff neglect, resident sustained multiple bruises Staff did not notify authorized representative of incident

On 9/9/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly LPA Mknelly arrived and met with Administrator to deliver investigation findings. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records, and conducted interviews. LPA finds that facility met Tittle 22 requirements. Records and interviews found that licensee identified and sought medical care for a pressure injury that started internally then surfaced. Records show R1 received a Dr. office visit, ultrasound to assess, and 2 ER visits before the wound was staged. R1 was hospitalized before returning to the home on hospice. Once the wound was staged, R1 was not retained in the home. R1 has advanced denmetia and mobility issues. Bruises were noted as incidental to R1's, at times, uncontrolled movement while in bed. Throughout R1's care, R1's spouse is a resident. Husband and family share POA and are regularly informed of R1's status. This agency has investigated the above complaint allegations. We have found that the complaint is UNFOUNDEDthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 9, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250710154744
Aug 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20241 state visit · 1 document
Aug 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints0typical 0
Total complaints2typical 0
State visits on file10typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2018.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20252202024110202311020225502021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Placer County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (916) 865-4150

Is Heavenly Angels licensed?

Yes — Heavenly Angels is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Roseville (Placer County): California license #312700314, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 10 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated September 9, 2025, was marked “Unfounded” by the state.

Can Heavenly Angels care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Heavenly Angels with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordLICENSED FOR SIX(6) ADULTS OVER SIXTY(60), OF WHICH FOUR(4) MAY BE NON-AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR FOUR(4).

How much does Heavenly Angels cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Heavenly Angels's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Placer County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Heavenly Angels accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Heavenly Angels is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on September 22, 2021. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Heavenly Angels?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 10 state visits and 10 dated documents since 2021 for Heavenly Angels; 2 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 9, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unfounded. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

2 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff retained a resident with a prohibited health condition Due to staff neglect, resident sustained a pressure injury Due to staff neglect, resident sustained multiple bruises Staff did not notify authorized representative of incident
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
On 9/9/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly LPA Mknelly arrived and met with Administrator to deliver investigation findings. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records, and conducted interviews. LPA finds that facility met Tittle 22 requirements. Records and interviews found that licensee identified and sought medical care for a pressure injury that started internally then surfaced. Records show R1 received a Dr. office visit, ultrasound to assess, and 2 ER visits before the wound was staged. R1 was hospitalized before returning to the home on hospice. Once the wound was staged, R1 was not retained in the home. R1 has advanced denmetia and mobility issues. Bruises were noted as incidental to R1's, at times, uncontrolled movement while in bed. Throughout R1's care, R1's spouse is a resident. Husband and family share POA and are regularly informed of R1's status. This agency has investigated the above complaint allegations. We have found that the complaint is UNFOUNDEDCDSS inspection report, September 9, 2025 · control 59-AS-20250710154744

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident not receiving well-balanced meals. Resident is not being encouraged to participate as fully as their conditions permit in daily living activities.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Mknelly arrived at the facility unannounced on 09/22//2021 to deliver investigation findings for complaint received on 09/14/21. Prior to visit, LPA completed required COVID-19 testing protocols, and a daily self-screening questionnaire for symptoms of COVID-19 infection to affirm no COVID-19 related symptoms; upon entry LPA completed a facility risk assessment. LPA ensured they applied hand sanitizer before entering the facility and the following Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was worn: Surgical Mask. LPA reviewed resident records, facility records, and conducted interviews. LPA finds that facility met Tittle 22 requirements.Records from R1's physician confirmed that R1 was receiving the proper diet and level of activity for their current condition. Immediate family who visit the facility often express being very satisfied with R1's care. This agency has investigated the above complaint allegations. We have found that the complaint is UNFOUNDCDSS inspection report, September 22, 2021 · control 25-AS-20210914145308

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 10 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing. No substantiated complaints are on file.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
0
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
2
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
10
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(916) 865-4150
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Heavenly Angels? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.