Ivy Park Of Wellington is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Laguna Woods, Orange County, California — state license #306006233, licensed for 220 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 10 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated September 22, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

11 homes in view

Ivy Park Of Wellington

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 220 residents · Laguna Woods, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306006233, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
24962 Calle Aragon · Laguna Woods, Orange County
Phone
(562) 865-9500
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 120 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 25 residents
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 92 AMBULATORY, 120 NON-AMBULATORY, AND 8 BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN APPROVED FOR BEDROOMS, B107, B109, B111, B112, B113, D201, D202, AND D203. DELAYED EGRESS DOORS FOR MEMORY CARE ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 11 times and filed 10 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on September 22, 2025 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
September 22, 2025
Occupancy at that visit
163 of 220 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 5 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 2, 2025 to September 22, 2025. 5 of the 5 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 5 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 5 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 10 of 10 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20255 state visits · 7 documents
Sep 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left resident unattended on toilet with no clothes on for an extended amount of time.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude investigation to the above identified complaint allegation. LPA arrived at the facility and was greeted at the door and granted entry. LPA spoke with Brenda Myers, Interim Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included tour of the facility, facility file review, resident file review and interviews conducted. It is alleged that staff left resident unattended on the toilet with no clothes on for an extended amount of time. The interview with staff stated that on August 27, 2025, resident (R1) was being assisted with toileting needs, physical therapist arrived to R1’s apartment and did not knock and proceeded to walk in. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250828135635
Sep 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not respond to resident's calls for assistance in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude investigation to the above identified complaint allegation. LPA arrived at the facility and was greeted at the door and granted entry. LPA spoke with Brenda Myers, Interim Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included tour of the facility, facility file review, resident file review and interviews conducted. It is alleged that staff do not respond to residents’ calls for assistance in a timely manner. An interview with staff stated that when a pendant is pressed that common practice on response time is 15 minutes max and staff respond on a timely manner. LPA conducted a facility visit on September 3, 2025, and Continued on LIC9099-C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 22, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250902110950
Sep 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Licensee is violating the fire clearance.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced initial 10-Day complaint visit to initiate the investigation into the above allegation and to deliver the findings of the investigation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by the receptionist. LPA met with Executive Director/Administrator David Armour. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included facility file review, tour of the physical plant of the facility and interviews conducted. It is alleged the license is violating the fire clearance, more specifically to non-ambulatory resident living and/or moving into the third and fourth floor of the facility. LPA obtained copies of the LIC850 Fire Safety Continued on LIC9099-C Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 14, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250708122727
Apr 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is not following their Infection Control Plan Facility did not provide the necessary cleaning services Facility did not provide adequate medical care

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility to follow-up on the investigation of the three allegations listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by front desk staff after stating the purpose of the visit. Administrator David Armour was notified and assisted with the visit in person. The initial complaint investigation visit was conducted by licensing staff on January 8, 2025. During the visit, LPAs accompanied by facility staff toured the premises. Records maintained at the facility for six residents were requested and obtained. Three staff interviews were conducted along with one resident interview. The facility's Infection Control Plan was also requested and reviewed. A follow-up visit took place on March 17, 2025. LPA conducted six additional staff interviews and toured the facility's memory care unit accompanied by facility staff. Additional witness interviews with Orange County Public Health staff were conductedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 28, 2025 · control 22-AS-20241230100233
Apr 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff discarded residents’ meals Staff is giving medication to residents without a prescription order

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced initial 10-Day complaint visit to initiate the investigation into the above allegations and to deliver the findings of the investigation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Administrator (AD) David Armour. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that staff discarded residents' meals. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews one of eight individuals interviewed confirm the allegations. During the course of the interviews with residents, Resident 1 (R1) reported that staff have never discarded their food. Per R1 she can get seconds and/or can substitute an item. During the course of the interviews with staff, Staff 1 (S1) reported that staff will only discard the food that is left over and once the residents have done eating. Per S1 if the residents do not like the food they have oththe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 2, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250327143704
Feb 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Oct 21, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Sep 26, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints5typical 7
State visits on file11typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202557120242202023110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (562) 865-9500

Is Ivy Park Of Wellington licensed?

Yes — Ivy Park Of Wellington is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Laguna Woods (Orange County): California license #306006233, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 220 residents. State records list 10 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated September 22, 2025, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Ivy Park Of Wellington care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Ivy Park Of Wellington with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 92 AMBULATORY, 120 NON-AMBULATORY, AND 8 BEDRIDDEN. BEDRIDDEN APPROVED FOR BEDROOMS, B107, B109, B111, B112, B113, D201, D202, AND D203. DELAYED EGRESS DOORS FOR MEMORY CARE ONLY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 25.

How much does Ivy Park Of Wellington cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Ivy Park Of Wellington's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Ivy Park Of Wellington accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Ivy Park Of Wellington is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

163 of 220 beds occupied (74%) when the state visited on September 22, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Ivy Park Of Wellington?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 11 state visits and 10 dated documents since 2023 for Ivy Park Of Wellington; 5 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 22, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

5 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left resident unattended on toilet with no clothes on for an extended amount of time.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude investigation to the above identified complaint allegation. LPA arrived at the facility and was greeted at the door and granted entry. LPA spoke with Brenda Myers, Interim Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included tour of the facility, facility file review, resident file review and interviews conducted. It is alleged that staff left resident unattended on the toilet with no clothes on for an extended amount of time. The interview with staff stated that on August 27, 2025, resident (R1) was being assisted with toileting needs, physical therapist arrived to R1’s apartment and did not knock and proceeded to walk in. Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 22, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250828135635
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not respond to resident's calls for assistance in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to conclude investigation to the above identified complaint allegation. LPA arrived at the facility and was greeted at the door and granted entry. LPA spoke with Brenda Myers, Interim Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included tour of the facility, facility file review, resident file review and interviews conducted. It is alleged that staff do not respond to residents’ calls for assistance in a timely manner. An interview with staff stated that when a pendant is pressed that common practice on response time is 15 minutes max and staff respond on a timely manner. LPA conducted a facility visit on September 3, 2025, and Continued on LIC9099-C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 22, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250902110950
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee is violating the fire clearance.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced initial 10-Day complaint visit to initiate the investigation into the above allegation and to deliver the findings of the investigation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by the receptionist. LPA met with Executive Director/Administrator David Armour. LPA explained the reason for the visit. Findings are based upon this investigation which included facility file review, tour of the physical plant of the facility and interviews conducted. It is alleged the license is violating the fire clearance, more specifically to non-ambulatory resident living and/or moving into the third and fourth floor of the facility. LPA obtained copies of the LIC850 Fire Safety Continued on LIC9099-C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, July 14, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250708122727
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is not following their Infection Control Plan Facility did not provide the necessary cleaning services Facility did not provide adequate medical care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility to follow-up on the investigation of the three allegations listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by front desk staff after stating the purpose of the visit. Administrator David Armour was notified and assisted with the visit in person. The initial complaint investigation visit was conducted by licensing staff on January 8, 2025. During the visit, LPAs accompanied by facility staff toured the premises. Records maintained at the facility for six residents were requested and obtained. Three staff interviews were conducted along with one resident interview. The facility's Infection Control Plan was also requested and reviewed. A follow-up visit took place on March 17, 2025. LPA conducted six additional staff interviews and toured the facility's memory care unit accompanied by facility staff. Additional witness interviews with Orange County Public Health staff were conductedCDSS inspection report, April 28, 2025 · control 22-AS-20241230100233
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff discarded residents’ meals Staff is giving medication to residents without a prescription order
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced initial 10-Day complaint visit to initiate the investigation into the above allegations and to deliver the findings of the investigation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Administrator (AD) David Armour. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This agency has investigated the complaint alleging that staff discarded residents' meals. Regarding the allegation, the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews one of eight individuals interviewed confirm the allegations. During the course of the interviews with residents, Resident 1 (R1) reported that staff have never discarded their food. Per R1 she can get seconds and/or can substitute an item. During the course of the interviews with staff, Staff 1 (S1) reported that staff will only discard the food that is left over and once the residents have done eating. Per S1 if the residents do not like the food they have othCDSS inspection report, April 2, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250327143704

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 11 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
11
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Ivy Park Of Wellington?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Well Oak Tenant Llc;oakmont Management Group Llc, who operates 6 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(562) 865-9500
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Ivy Park Of Wellington? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.