Activcare Laguna Hills is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Laguna Hills, Orange County, California — state license #306005986, licensed for 72 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 15 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated May 18, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

38 homes in view

Activcare Laguna Hills

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 72 residents · Laguna Hills, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306005986, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
25200 Paseo De Alicia · Laguna Hills, Orange County
Phone
(858) 565-4424
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 72 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 17 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 72 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 17 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15. APPROVED FOR SECURED PERIMETER AND DELAYED EGRESS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 16 times and filed 15 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated May 18, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 18, 2026
Occupancy at the March 28, 2026 visit
51 of 72 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 7 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 19, 2022 to March 28, 2026. 7 of the 7 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (6). 7 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 7 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 10 of 15 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20264 state visits · 5 documents
May 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are restraining resident Staff gave resident the wrong medication Staff do not serve food of nutricious quality

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate the above-mentioned allegations and deliver findings. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by staff, granted entry, and later met with Executive Director (ED) Patricia Miller, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents, and obtained copies of relevant documents. The allegations investigated were “Staff are restraining resident,” “Staff gave resident the wrong medication,” and “Staff do not serve food of nutritious quality.” Regarding the allegation, “Staff do not serve food of nutritious quality,” LPA interviewed five staff members and attempted to interview five residents. All five staff members denied the allegation. The residents were unable to provide reliable statements due to their current medical and cognitive condition. {***CONTINUE9099C***} Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2026 · control 22-AS-20250224143848
Mar 21, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not safeguard residents personal clothing Staff handled resident roughly causing a bruise

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate the above-mentioned allegations and deliver findings. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by staff, granted entry, and later met with Executive Director (ED) Patricia Miller, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents, and obtained copies of relevant documents. Regarding the allegation, “Staff do not safeguard residents personal clothing,” LPA conducted a phone interview with Resident 1’s responsible party (R1’s RP), who denied the allegation and stated that facility staff were helpful during R1’s stay. LPA also interviewed five staff members and attempted to interview five residents. All five staff members denied the allegation. The residents were unable to provide reliable statements due to their current medical and cognitive condition. {***CONTINUE9099C***} Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2026 · control 22-AS-20250224143848
Mar 7, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: -Staff left resident on the floor after a fall for a prolonged period of time 2-Staff do not assist residents with incontinence needs 3-Staff do not answer residents' call buttons in a timely manner 4-Staff do not ensure residents have adequate night time supervision

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate the above-mentioned allegations and deliver findings. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by staff, granted entry, and later met with Executive Director (ED) Patricia Miller, to whom the purpose of the visit was explained. During the visit, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents, and obtained copies of pertinent documents, including staff schedules, resident rosters, service request call button records, and staff training files. It was alleged that “Staff left resident on the floor after a fall for a prolonged period of time” and “Staff do not assist residents with incontinence needs”. LPA conducted six staff interviews and attempted six resident interviews. All six staff members denied both allegations. The residents interviewed were unable to provide reliable statements due to their cognitive condition. {***CONTINUE 9099C***} Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2026 · control 22-AS-20231004123439
20253 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 10, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents are left in soiled clothing for extended periods of time.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigation the above identified complaint allegation. LPA arrived at facility and was greeted at the door and granted entry receptionist. LPA spoke with Patricia Miller, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, a tour of the physical plant of the facility was conducted, a review of resident records was completed and copy of pertinent documents obtained. It is alleged residents are left in soiled clothing for extended period of time. Interview with 3 of 3 staff stated that facility is a memory care facility, and most the residents wear a diaper, residents can get combative, but staff are trained to deescalate the behavior in order to assist resident with diaper changes. Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 19, 2025 · control 22-AS-20220721102237
Apr 17, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not meet a resident's dental needs while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigation the above identified complaint allegation. LPA arrived at facility and was greeted at the door and granted entry receptionist. LPA spoke with Patricia Miller, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, a tour of the physical plant of the facility was conducted, a review of resident records was completed and copy of pertinent documents obtained. It is alleged that staff did not meet a resident’s dental needs while in care. Interview with 3 of 3 staff stated that R1 can become combative at times and physical. R1 can be cooperative upon initial services care Continued on LIC9099-C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 17, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250414095416
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff does not keep facility free from pests.

An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Claudia Gutierrez and Nancy Guillen regarding the allegation mentioned above. LPAs met with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) Alex Montenegro and explained the purpose of the inspection. During the course of the investigation, LPA Gutierrez conducted a tour of the facility, interviewed residents and staff, obtained and reviewed facility Building Maintenance Work Order Request Forms and Pest Control Service Reports, and the following was revealed: On August 13, 2024, Building Maintenance Work Order Request Form was submitted reporting ants in the medication room and in a vacant bedroom. Per Service Report from Pest Control Company dated August 13, 2024, "For today’s service, I treated around both exterior courtyards around all walkways, windows, as well as around base of buildings. I then treated the rest of the exterior of the building as well as inspected and refilled all rodent monitorthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 25, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240917082750
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations1typical 1
Substantiated complaints1typical 2
Total complaints6typical 7
State visits on file16typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20264502025330202422020224412021220
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (858) 565-4424

Is Activcare Laguna Hills licensed?

Yes — Activcare Laguna Hills is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Laguna Hills (Orange County): California license #306005986, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 72 residents. State records list 15 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated May 18, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Activcare Laguna Hills care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Activcare Laguna Hills with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 72 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 17 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15. APPROVED FOR SECURED PERIMETER AND DELAYED EGRESS.

How much does Activcare Laguna Hills cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Activcare Laguna Hills's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Activcare Laguna Hills accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Activcare Laguna Hills is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

51 of 72 beds occupied (71%) when the state visited on March 28, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Activcare Laguna Hills?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 16 state visits and 15 dated documents since 2021 for Activcare Laguna Hills; 7 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 28, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

7 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are restraining resident Staff gave resident the wrong medication Staff do not serve food of nutricious quality
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate the above-mentioned allegations and deliver findings. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by staff, granted entry, and later met with Executive Director (ED) Patricia Miller, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents, and obtained copies of relevant documents. The allegations investigated were “Staff are restraining resident,” “Staff gave resident the wrong medication,” and “Staff do not serve food of nutritious quality.” Regarding the allegation, “Staff do not serve food of nutritious quality,” LPA interviewed five staff members and attempted to interview five residents. All five staff members denied the allegation. The residents were unable to provide reliable statements due to their current medical and cognitive condition. {***CONTINUE9099C***} UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 28, 2026 · control 22-AS-20250224143848
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not safeguard residents personal clothing Staff handled resident roughly causing a bruise
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate the above-mentioned allegations and deliver findings. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by staff, granted entry, and later met with Executive Director (ED) Patricia Miller, who was informed of the purpose of the visit. During the visit, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents, and obtained copies of relevant documents. Regarding the allegation, “Staff do not safeguard residents personal clothing,” LPA conducted a phone interview with Resident 1’s responsible party (R1’s RP), who denied the allegation and stated that facility staff were helpful during R1’s stay. LPA also interviewed five staff members and attempted to interview five residents. All five staff members denied the allegation. The residents were unable to provide reliable statements due to their current medical and cognitive condition. {***CONTINUE9099C***} UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 21, 2026 · control 22-AS-20250224143848
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed-Staff left resident on the floor after a fall for a prolonged period of time 2-Staff do not assist residents with incontinence needs 3-Staff do not answer residents' call buttons in a timely manner 4-Staff do not ensure residents have adequate night time supervision
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Samer Haddadin conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigate the above-mentioned allegations and deliver findings. Upon arrival, LPA was greeted by staff, granted entry, and later met with Executive Director (ED) Patricia Miller, to whom the purpose of the visit was explained. During the visit, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents, and obtained copies of pertinent documents, including staff schedules, resident rosters, service request call button records, and staff training files. It was alleged that “Staff left resident on the floor after a fall for a prolonged period of time” and “Staff do not assist residents with incontinence needs”. LPA conducted six staff interviews and attempted six resident interviews. All six staff members denied both allegations. The residents interviewed were unable to provide reliable statements due to their cognitive condition. {***CONTINUE 9099C***} UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 7, 2026 · control 22-AS-20231004123439

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents are left in soiled clothing for extended periods of time.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigation the above identified complaint allegation. LPA arrived at facility and was greeted at the door and granted entry receptionist. LPA spoke with Patricia Miller, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, a tour of the physical plant of the facility was conducted, a review of resident records was completed and copy of pertinent documents obtained. It is alleged residents are left in soiled clothing for extended period of time. Interview with 3 of 3 staff stated that facility is a memory care facility, and most the residents wear a diaper, residents can get combative, but staff are trained to deescalate the behavior in order to assist resident with diaper changes. Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 19, 2025 · control 22-AS-20220721102237
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not meet a resident's dental needs while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Ruth Martinez conducted an unannounced visit to the facility to investigation the above identified complaint allegation. LPA arrived at facility and was greeted at the door and granted entry receptionist. LPA spoke with Patricia Miller, Executive Director and explained the purpose of the visit. During the course of the investigation, interviews were conducted, a tour of the physical plant of the facility was conducted, a review of resident records was completed and copy of pertinent documents obtained. It is alleged that staff did not meet a resident’s dental needs while in care. Interview with 3 of 3 staff stated that R1 can become combative at times and physical. R1 can be cooperative upon initial services care Continued on LIC9099-C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 17, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250414095416

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff does not keep facility free from pests.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
An unannounced Complaint Investigation was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Claudia Gutierrez and Nancy Guillen regarding the allegation mentioned above. LPAs met with Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) Alex Montenegro and explained the purpose of the inspection. During the course of the investigation, LPA Gutierrez conducted a tour of the facility, interviewed residents and staff, obtained and reviewed facility Building Maintenance Work Order Request Forms and Pest Control Service Reports, and the following was revealed: On August 13, 2024, Building Maintenance Work Order Request Form was submitted reporting ants in the medication room and in a vacant bedroom. Per Service Report from Pest Control Company dated August 13, 2024, "For today’s service, I treated around both exterior courtyards around all walkways, windows, as well as around base of buildings. I then treated the rest of the exterior of the building as well as inspected and refilled all rodent monitorCDSS inspection report, October 25, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240917082750

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 16 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
16
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(858) 565-4424
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Activcare Laguna Hills? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.