Newport Mesa Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Costa Mesa, Orange County, California — state license #306004640, licensed for 40 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 18 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated June 16, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

8 homes in view

Newport Mesa Senior Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Mid-size home, 40 residents · Costa Mesa, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #306004640, held since 2014 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
2891 Bear St · Costa Mesa, Orange County
Phone
(949) 629-1020
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 40 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 15 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 15 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
FORTY NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, NEWPORT MESA MGR LLC, EFFECTIVE 01/10/2025. ED.NEWPORTMESA@NEWPORTMESASENIORLIVING.COMState service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 20 times and filed 18 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated June 16, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 16, 2026
Occupancy at the June 4, 2026 visit
19 of 40 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 26, 2023 to June 4, 2026. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 15 of 18 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20263 state visits · 5 documents
Jun 16, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure the residents were administered their medication

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Fred Arias conducted an unannounced complaint visit to finalize an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. It was alleged staff do not ensure the residents were administered their medication. LPA conducted interviews with staff. LPA reviewed records obtained. The investigation determined as follows: Regarding the allegation staff did not ensure the residents were administered their medication, it was reported medications are not being administered per physician's orders. Interviews with four out of eleven staff stated on December 7, 2025, medications were given to residents late because there was no staff available to administer resident medications. Resident 2 (R2) called Costa Mesa PD to report no one provided their medications. Costa Mesa PD arrived at the facility. The police officer called Staff 1 (S1) to have them return to the facility to assist with adminthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 4, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251208162553
Jun 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20258 state visits · 8 documents
Oct 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 5, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 12, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not ensure that modified diets prescribed by a resident's physician as a medical necessity was provided.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre met with Executive Director Rose Nakadaira and Memory Care Director Amy Kaplli for the purpose of delivering findings for the above allegations. The complaint consisted of interviews, record review, and observations. On October 23, 2024 the department received allegations that facility did not ensure that modified diets prescribed by a resident’s physician as a medical necessity was provided. The investigation was completed by the Department and revealed the following: Based off interviews with staff, eight out of eight staff interviewed stated that they were all aware Resident 1 (R1) had a special pureed diet. Six of eight staff stated that they are notified of diet and or medication changes via a group chat that is sent out via text message to staff phones. Five of eight staff were aware that R1 had an incident where they were not given a pureed meal and aspirated on food. Three of eight staff members interviewed stated that R1 was fed methe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20241023094545
Mar 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Medication was not administered to residents appropriately

This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of delivering findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Rose Nakadaira and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that medication was not administered to residents appropriately revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, residents, and staff, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, and the facility’s Medication Administration Records. CONTINUED Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 10, 2025 · control 22-AS-20210617131615
20241 state visit · 1 document
Aug 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility planned group activities without the use of proper PPE Facility failed to cohort covid positive residents from covid negative residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Rosie Nakadaira and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation, facility planned group activities without the use of proper PPE revealed the following. It was alleged that staff did not use PPE properly during a staff led resident outing and this led to many staff and residents testing positive for Covid-19. Staff interviewed reported that the outing on 11/21/2020 was a ride in the facility van where only residents who had tested negative for Covid-19 were taken on a brief ride to see the beach and then returned to the facility. Staff and the Administrator reported that both staff present during the trip wore masks and all the residents on the trip were given masks to wear but removed them during the field trip. There were two staff members present during the fithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2023 · control 22-AS-20201209154307
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 1
Type B citations0typical 1
Substantiated complaints3typical 2
Total complaints4typical 7
State visits on file20typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2014.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202635120258822024110202322020221102021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2026 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (949) 629-1020

Is Newport Mesa Senior Living licensed?

Yes — Newport Mesa Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Costa Mesa (Orange County): California license #306004640, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 40 residents. State records list 18 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated June 16, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Newport Mesa Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Newport Mesa Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordFORTY NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 15. NEW MANAGEMENT COMPANY, NEWPORT MESA MGR LLC, EFFECTIVE 01/10/2025. ED.NEWPORTMESA@NEWPORTMESASENIORLIVING.COM

How much does Newport Mesa Senior Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Newport Mesa Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Newport Mesa Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Newport Mesa Senior Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

19 of 40 beds occupied (48%) when the state visited on June 4, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Newport Mesa Senior Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 20 state visits and 18 dated documents since 2021 for Newport Mesa Senior Living; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 4, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure the residents were administered their medication
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Fred Arias conducted an unannounced complaint visit to finalize an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. It was alleged staff do not ensure the residents were administered their medication. LPA conducted interviews with staff. LPA reviewed records obtained. The investigation determined as follows: Regarding the allegation staff did not ensure the residents were administered their medication, it was reported medications are not being administered per physician's orders. Interviews with four out of eleven staff stated on December 7, 2025, medications were given to residents late because there was no staff available to administer resident medications. Resident 2 (R2) called Costa Mesa PD to report no one provided their medications. Costa Mesa PD arrived at the facility. The police officer called Staff 1 (S1) to have them return to the facility to assist with adminCDSS inspection report, June 4, 2026 · control 22-AS-20251208162553

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not ensure that modified diets prescribed by a resident's physician as a medical necessity was provided.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jenifer Tirre met with Executive Director Rose Nakadaira and Memory Care Director Amy Kaplli for the purpose of delivering findings for the above allegations. The complaint consisted of interviews, record review, and observations. On October 23, 2024 the department received allegations that facility did not ensure that modified diets prescribed by a resident’s physician as a medical necessity was provided. The investigation was completed by the Department and revealed the following: Based off interviews with staff, eight out of eight staff interviewed stated that they were all aware Resident 1 (R1) had a special pureed diet. Six of eight staff stated that they are notified of diet and or medication changes via a group chat that is sent out via text message to staff phones. Five of eight staff were aware that R1 had an incident where they were not given a pureed meal and aspirated on food. Three of eight staff members interviewed stated that R1 was fed meCDSS inspection report, March 12, 2025 · control 22-AS-20241023094545
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedMedication was not administered to residents appropriately
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This unannounced inspection is being conducted by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sean Haddad for the purpose of delivering findings for the investigation into the above identified complaint allegation. LPA met with Administrator (AD) Rose Nakadaira and explained the reason for today’s inspection. The investigation into the allegation that medication was not administered to residents appropriately revealed the following: During the course of the investigation, LPA inspected the facility, interviewed AD, residents, and staff, and obtained and reviewed copies of the resident roster, staff roster, and the facility’s Medication Administration Records. CONTINUED SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 10, 2025 · control 22-AS-20210617131615

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility planned group activities without the use of proper PPE Facility failed to cohort covid positive residents from covid negative residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Joseph Alejandre made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings of the complaint investigation into the allegations listed above. LPA met with Executive Director Rosie Nakadaira and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation into the allegation, facility planned group activities without the use of proper PPE revealed the following. It was alleged that staff did not use PPE properly during a staff led resident outing and this led to many staff and residents testing positive for Covid-19. Staff interviewed reported that the outing on 11/21/2020 was a ride in the facility van where only residents who had tested negative for Covid-19 were taken on a brief ride to see the beach and then returned to the facility. Staff and the Administrator reported that both staff present during the trip wore masks and all the residents on the trip were given masks to wear but removed them during the field trip. There were two staff members present during the fiCDSS inspection report, October 26, 2023 · control 22-AS-20201209154307

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 20 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
3
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
4
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
20
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(949) 629-1020
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Newport Mesa Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.