Brookdale Valley View is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Garden Grove, Orange County, California — state license #306001000, with a licensed capacity of 160, listed as closed, change of ownership in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 27 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated December 17, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

300 homes in view

Brookdale Valley View

The state record lists this licence as “Closed, Change of Ownership”. A closed licence cannot admit residents. We keep closed licences published because “is this place licensed?” deserves an honest answer.

The state also licenses a home at this address today: Savant Of Garden Grove · licence #306006709

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 160 residents · Garden Grove, CA · Orange County
Closed in state recordWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days · we confirm by phone before any referral
License #306001000, held since 1999 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
5900 Chapman Ave · Garden Grove, Orange County
Phone
(714) 898-3524
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 160 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 12 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 21 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
160 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 21 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12State service designation985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 29 times and filed 27 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated December 17, 2025.

Most recent state visit
December 17, 2025
Occupancy at the July 11, 2025 visit
68 of 160 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 10 documents with transcribed findings, dated August 12, 2021 to July 11, 2025. 10 of the 10 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unfounded” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 10 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 10 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 18 of 27 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20259 state visits · 12 documents
Dec 17, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 11, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is mismanaging resident's medication

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the investigation of the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by facility front desk staff after introducing himself and stating the purpose of the visit. Facility Executive Director Christine Perez was present and assisted with the visit. An initial investigation visit has taken place on June 11, 2025. During the visit, LPA requested the facility current census as well as the identification of residents on medication management and residents self-administering. A random selection of records for three residents on self-administration and three residents on medication management was requested, obtained and reviewed during the visit. Medication administration records and centrally stored medication also reviewed for the residents in question. Additionally, LPA conducted or attempted four staff interviews and four resident intthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 11, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250605124628
Jul 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not keeping resident rooms at a comfortable temperature

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the visit, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as work orders. Regarding the allegation that facility staff are not keeping resident rooms at a comfortable temperature, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) indicated facility temperatures are not comfortable. LPA observed temperature in resident's room is 76 degrees F and dining room/ hallway temperatures are 75 degrees F. Facility provided an oscillating fan to resident for additional cooling. Resident is observed to be wearing a shirt, long sleeve hoodie as well as a puffer jacket while stating the temperatures are cold in the dining room and the many layers are needed. LPA reviewed facilitythe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250707085837
Jul 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 18, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 24, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not respond to resident's call in a timely manner Staff utilizes an inappropriate lock on resident's door.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as facility notes. Regarding the allegations that staff did not respond to resident's call in a timely manner and staff utilizes an inappropriate lock on resident's door, the investigation revealed the following: On 02/13/2024, Resident 1 (R1) requested staff to call 911 for knee pain. Administrator called 911 and Emergency Medical Services (EMS), Lynch Ambulance, arrived to the facility. EMS put the resident on a gurney and took the resident downstairs for transport. In the meantime, staff locked the resident's door with an exterior lock per resident request. Once downstairs, the resident declined transport as the resthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 15, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240214140414
Jan 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: lack of care and supervision

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as staff schedule. Regarding the allegation of lack of care and supervision, the investigation revealed the following: Facility schedule indicates three caregivers, one med tech and one coordinator for 1st and 2nd shift and one caregiver/ med tech for the overnight shift. Six out of six staff and four out of four residents state care and supervision is being provided to residents. One out of four residents state staff are slow to respond when the emergency pendant is pushed. Staff indicate Resident 1 (R1) came back to the facility under the influence of marijuana after a visit with family and was observedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 8, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240205143436
Jan 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20245 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 17, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are not properly trained Facility is unsanitary

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and witness as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as staff training. Regarding the allegations that facility staff are not properly trained and facility is unsanitary, the investigation revealed the following: On 02/12/2024, Staff 1 (S1) administered a vaginal suppository to Resident 1 (R1) per Health and Wellness Director's (HWD) instruction. LPA reviewed S1's training records during the visit and staff had required annual training. While the staff had medication training, S1 is not a skilled professional as required by title 22 regulations. Facility was alerted to the situation and the Health and Wellness Director was terminated on 02/26/2024. S1 was providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240226161612
20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 3, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff do not ensure special dietary restrictions are followed for resident in care Staff did not ensure resident received medical treatment in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings on the complaint allegations mentioned above. LPA Haley met with Executive Director (ED) Melissa Weibel and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation, staff interviews were conducted, documents were reviewed, and observations were made during the unannounced visit. Regarding the allegation: Staff do not ensure special dietary restrictions are followed for resident in care Document review revealed Resident 1 (R1) was not on a special diet at the time the complaint was filed September 1, 2023. R1 was on a texture modified diet when the resident first moved into the facility in July 7, 2023. However, on August 1, 2023, R1 received a physician’s order for a regular diet with no texture modifications. During interviews, it was discovered R1 doesn’t like sweets and doesn’t eat sweet food. During the visit, observations were made that contradict the allegation above. Continued onthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230901162928
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations4typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints10typical 7
State visits on file29typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1999.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202591212024551202333120222202021351
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one.
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →

Is Brookdale Valley View licensed?

No — not currently. The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists Brookdale Valley View in Garden Grove (Orange County), California license #306001000, as “Closed, Change Of Ownership, formerly licensed for 160 residents. State records list 27 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated December 17, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Brookdale Valley View care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Brookdale Valley View with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record160 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 21 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN, HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12

How much does Brookdale Valley View cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Brookdale Valley View's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Brookdale Valley View accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Brookdale Valley View is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

68 of 160 beds occupied (43%) when the state visited on July 11, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Brookdale Valley View?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 29 state visits and 27 dated documents since 2021 for Brookdale Valley View; 10 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated July 11, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

10 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is mismanaging resident's medication
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch made an unannounced visit to the facility for the purpose of following up on the investigation of the allegation listed above. LPA was greeted and granted entry by facility front desk staff after introducing himself and stating the purpose of the visit. Facility Executive Director Christine Perez was present and assisted with the visit. An initial investigation visit has taken place on June 11, 2025. During the visit, LPA requested the facility current census as well as the identification of residents on medication management and residents self-administering. A random selection of records for three residents on self-administration and three residents on medication management was requested, obtained and reviewed during the visit. Medication administration records and centrally stored medication also reviewed for the residents in question. Additionally, LPA conducted or attempted four staff interviews and four resident intCDSS inspection report, July 11, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250605124628
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not keeping resident rooms at a comfortable temperature
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the visit, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and resident as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as work orders. Regarding the allegation that facility staff are not keeping resident rooms at a comfortable temperature, the investigation revealed the following: Resident 1 (R1) indicated facility temperatures are not comfortable. LPA observed temperature in resident's room is 76 degrees F and dining room/ hallway temperatures are 75 degrees F. Facility provided an oscillating fan to resident for additional cooling. Resident is observed to be wearing a shirt, long sleeve hoodie as well as a puffer jacket while stating the temperatures are cold in the dining room and the many layers are needed. LPA reviewed facilityCDSS inspection report, July 10, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250707085837
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not respond to resident's call in a timely manner Staff utilizes an inappropriate lock on resident's door.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as facility notes. Regarding the allegations that staff did not respond to resident's call in a timely manner and staff utilizes an inappropriate lock on resident's door, the investigation revealed the following: On 02/13/2024, Resident 1 (R1) requested staff to call 911 for knee pain. Administrator called 911 and Emergency Medical Services (EMS), Lynch Ambulance, arrived to the facility. EMS put the resident on a gurney and took the resident downstairs for transport. In the meantime, staff locked the resident's door with an exterior lock per resident request. Once downstairs, the resident declined transport as the resCDSS inspection report, January 15, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240214140414
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedlack of care and supervision
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility and interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as staff schedule. Regarding the allegation of lack of care and supervision, the investigation revealed the following: Facility schedule indicates three caregivers, one med tech and one coordinator for 1st and 2nd shift and one caregiver/ med tech for the overnight shift. Six out of six staff and four out of four residents state care and supervision is being provided to residents. One out of four residents state staff are slow to respond when the emergency pendant is pushed. Staff indicate Resident 1 (R1) came back to the facility under the influence of marijuana after a visit with family and was observedCDSS inspection report, January 8, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240205143436

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not properly trained Facility is unsanitary
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to initiate an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and witness as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as staff training. Regarding the allegations that facility staff are not properly trained and facility is unsanitary, the investigation revealed the following: On 02/12/2024, Staff 1 (S1) administered a vaginal suppository to Resident 1 (R1) per Health and Wellness Director's (HWD) instruction. LPA reviewed S1's training records during the visit and staff had required annual training. While the staff had medication training, S1 is not a skilled professional as required by title 22 regulations. Facility was alerted to the situation and the Health and Wellness Director was terminated on 02/26/2024. S1 was providedCDSS inspection report, March 4, 2024 · control 22-AS-20240226161612

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not ensure special dietary restrictions are followed for resident in care Staff did not ensure resident received medical treatment in a timely manner
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to deliver the findings on the complaint allegations mentioned above. LPA Haley met with Executive Director (ED) Melissa Weibel and explained the reason for the visit. During the investigation, staff interviews were conducted, documents were reviewed, and observations were made during the unannounced visit. Regarding the allegation: Staff do not ensure special dietary restrictions are followed for resident in care Document review revealed Resident 1 (R1) was not on a special diet at the time the complaint was filed September 1, 2023. R1 was on a texture modified diet when the resident first moved into the facility in July 7, 2023. However, on August 1, 2023, R1 received a physician’s order for a regular diet with no texture modifications. During interviews, it was discovered R1 doesn’t like sweets and doesn’t eat sweet food. During the visit, observations were made that contradict the allegation above. Continued onCDSS inspection report, October 3, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230901162928
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLack of staffing resulted in facility not meeting resident's needs.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Lyman conducted an unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings on the above allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility by Executive Director (ED) Melissa Weibel and explained the reason for the visit. Wellness Director Michelle Drinkard arrived during the visit. During the course of the investigation, LPA toured the facility, interviewed staff and residents as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation such as physician report and staff achedule. Regarding the allegation that lack of staffing resulted in facility not meeting resident's needs, the investigation revealed the following: Four out of four staff and six out of six residents confirm staffing issues during the time frame alleged in complaint. Four out of four staff indicate Resident 1 (R1) was a 2 person assist and sometimes there would be only one caregiver working. All staff interviewed state staffing issues are improved as of time of complaint filiCDSS inspection report, February 27, 2023 · control 22-AS-20230214144423
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is increasing residents rent without proper notice
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kevin Saborit-Guasch conducted an unannounced inspection visit to follow up on the investigation of the allegation listed above and deliver findings in the investigation of the allegation. LPA was greeted and granted entry by Executive Director Melissa Weibel after explaining the purpose of the visit and detailing the allegation being investigated at this time. It was alleged that Facility is increasing residents rent without proper notice. LPA Saborit-Guasch conducted a joint initial complaint investigation visit along with LPA Alvaro Ramirez Jr. on 11/22/2022. A follow-up visit was then conducted on 01/12/2023. During the investigation, the Department interviewed the administrator, the (now former) Health and Wellness Director along with the alleged victim as well as reviewed and obtained pertinent documentation including Progress Notes, Individual Needs and Services assessments and Admission Agreement. CONTINUED ON FORM LIC9099-C UnsubstaCDSS inspection report, January 12, 2023 · control 22-AS-20221115162302

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 29 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
4
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
10
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
29
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Brookdale Valley View?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Summerville At Cobbco Inc; Emeritus Corporation, who operates 7 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(714) 898-3524
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Brookdale Valley View? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.