Regents Point is a continuing-care retirement community in Irvine, Orange County, California — state license #300603257, licensed for 399 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 19 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 5, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Regents Point

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Continuing-care retirement community · Large community, 399 residents · Irvine, CA · Orange County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceMemory care not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #300603257, held since 1982 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
19191 Harvard Avenue · Irvine, Orange County
Phone
(949) 854-9500
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 60 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 12 residents
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
60 NON AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12.State service designation938 - CONTINUE CARE CONTRACT (CCC)the CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 20 times and filed 19 documents. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on June 5, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

Most recent state visit
June 5, 2026
Occupancy at that visit
383 of 399 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 8 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 6, 2023 to June 5, 2026. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (5). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 8 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 13 of 19 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20265 state visits · 5 documents
Jun 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not give resident medication as prescribed. Staff did not keep resident's authorized person informed about the resident's care. Facility is not conducting reappraisal properly.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Fred Arias conducted an unannounced complaint visit to finalize an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. It was alleged staff did not give resident medication as prescribed, staff did not keep resident's authorized person informed about the resident's care, and facility is not conducting reappraisal properly. LPA conducted interviews with staff. LPA reviewed records obtained. The investigation determined as follows: Regarding the allegation staff did not give resident medication as prescribed, it was reported staff is crushing Resident 1 (R1)'s medications without a physician's order. Interviews with nine out of eleven staff stated they have not crushed medications without a physician's order. One out of the remaining three staff stated they are unaware of any medications crushed prior to January 24, 2026. The two remaining staff did not add anything relevantthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260123144440
Jun 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Staff did not check on resident in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to begin the investigation into the complaint allegation listed above. LPA explained the purpose of the visit upon entry. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews and document review. Regarding the allegation: Staff did not check on resident in a timely manner During the investigation it was discovered the alleged victim is not an Assisted Living (AL) or Memory Care (MC) Resident. LPA Haley reviewed the resident roster for Assisted Living and Memory Care. The individual was not admitted to either level of living in the community. Based on the information gathered through interview and document review, the allegation is deemed unfounded, meaning the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260527155209
May 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 3, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Residents were not evaluated for proper medical care. Residents were not receiving hygiene care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on June 6, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Nurse Manager (NM) Sheila Weathers, Wellness Director Ashley Croslin and Executive Director (ED) Melinda Forney. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that Residents were not evaluated for proper medical care. Regarding the allegation the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews with individuals ten of eleven individuals interviewed denied the allegations. During the investigation LPA reviewed the Regents Points Resident roster dated June 12, 2024. Per Resident roster, three of four residents mentioned on the complaint are not residents at Regents Point, #300603257. LPA was able to interview Resident 4 (R4) who matches one of the resident names. R4 denied the allegations. During the interviews wthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2026 · control 22-AS-20240606125839
Jan 21, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20256 state visits · 6 documents
Nov 25, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not give resident medication as prescribed Staff did not keep resident's authorized person informed about the resident's care

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Fred Arias made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on May 27, 2025, and the initial 10-day visit was conducted on June 6, 2025. The Department obtained copies of documents including in-service staff training, physician’s report, medication administration record, and admission agreement for Resident 1 (R1). It was alleged staff did not give resident medication as prescribed and staff did not keep resident’s authorized person informed about the resident’s care. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with staff and reviewed records obtained. The investigation determined as follows: Regarding the allegation staff did not give resident medication as prescribed, it was reported R1 had missed medication administration on more than 148 instances. Continued on 9099-C dated on 07/10/2025. Substantthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250527184045
Jun 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident sustained multiple falls due to lack of care and supervision Facility failed to obtain timely medical attention for residents exhibiting medical distress Facility double billed residents Staff are discouraging other staff to report incidents involving residents in care.

On 06/05/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson contacted the licensee via phone and email to deliver final findings regarding a complaint that was received on 03/26/2024. **Report continued on 9099-D page** Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240326103120
May 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20242 state visits · 2 documents
Feb 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident developed pressure injuries due to neglect Resident sustained an injury due to an unwitnessed fall

On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility Nurse Manager Sheila Weathers and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on 12/01/2020 and the initial 10 day visit was conducted on 12/10/2020. LPA Mendivil conducted a follow up visit on 10/25/2023. LPA Mendivil obtained copies of documents including physicians report and medical records. Regarding the allegations Resident developed pressure injuries due to neglect and Resident sustained an injury due to an unwitnessed fall, the investigation revealed the following: Based on medical records dated from 11/16/2020 to 11/28/2020 it was reported on 11/17/2020 that Resident 1 (R1) was diagnosed with a stage 1 wound on coccyx. Based on interviews with 4 out of 4 staff all indicated that R1 did not have any wounds and did not have a history of skin breakdown, when R1 was sent out to the hospthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2024 · control 22-AS-20201201090430
Feb 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints2typical 2
Total complaints8typical 7
State visits on file20typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1982.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20265502025661202422020232202022340
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Orange County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (949) 854-9500

Is Regents Point licensed?

Yes — Regents Point is a licensed continuing-care retirement community in Irvine (Orange County): California license #300603257, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 399 residents. State records list 19 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 5, 2026, was marked “Unsubstantiated” by the state.

Can Regents Point care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Regents Point with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and hospice care; it does not list dementia / memory care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license record60 NON AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 12.

How much does Regents Point cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Regents Point's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Orange County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Regents Point accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Regents Point is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

383 of 399 beds occupied (96%) when the state visited on June 5, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Regents Point?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 20 state visits and 19 dated documents since 2022 for Regents Point; 8 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 5, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

8 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not give resident medication as prescribed. Staff did not keep resident's authorized person informed about the resident's care. Facility is not conducting reappraisal properly.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Fred Arias conducted an unannounced complaint visit to finalize an investigation into the above allegations. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. It was alleged staff did not give resident medication as prescribed, staff did not keep resident's authorized person informed about the resident's care, and facility is not conducting reappraisal properly. LPA conducted interviews with staff. LPA reviewed records obtained. The investigation determined as follows: Regarding the allegation staff did not give resident medication as prescribed, it was reported staff is crushing Resident 1 (R1)'s medications without a physician's order. Interviews with nine out of eleven staff stated they have not crushed medications without a physician's order. One out of the remaining three staff stated they are unaware of any medications crushed prior to January 24, 2026. The two remaining staff did not add anything relevantCDSS inspection report, June 5, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260123144440
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not check on resident in a timely manner
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Jerome Haley made an unannounced visit to begin the investigation into the complaint allegation listed above. LPA explained the purpose of the visit upon entry. The complaint investigation consisted of interviews and document review. Regarding the allegation: Staff did not check on resident in a timely manner During the investigation it was discovered the alleged victim is not an Assisted Living (AL) or Memory Care (MC) Resident. LPA Haley reviewed the resident roster for Assisted Living and Memory Care. The individual was not admitted to either level of living in the community. Based on the information gathered through interview and document review, the allegation is deemed unfounded, meaning the allegation is false, could not have happened and/or is without a reasonable basis. An exit interview was conducted, and a copy of this report was provided. UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, June 3, 2026 · control 22-AS-20260527155209
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResidents were not evaluated for proper medical care. Residents were not receiving hygiene care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alvaro Ramirez, Jr. conducted an unannounced visit to deliver findings on the above allegations received on June 6, 2024. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and met with Nurse Manager (NM) Sheila Weathers, Wellness Director Ashley Croslin and Executive Director (ED) Melinda Forney. LPA explained the reason for the visit. This Department has investigated the complaint alleging that Residents were not evaluated for proper medical care. Regarding the allegation the following was revealed: During the course of the interviews with individuals ten of eleven individuals interviewed denied the allegations. During the investigation LPA reviewed the Regents Points Resident roster dated June 12, 2024. Per Resident roster, three of four residents mentioned on the complaint are not residents at Regents Point, #300603257. LPA was able to interview Resident 4 (R4) who matches one of the resident names. R4 denied the allegations. During the interviews wCDSS inspection report, February 3, 2026 · control 22-AS-20240606125839

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not give resident medication as prescribed Staff did not keep resident's authorized person informed about the resident's care
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Fred Arias made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on May 27, 2025, and the initial 10-day visit was conducted on June 6, 2025. The Department obtained copies of documents including in-service staff training, physician’s report, medication administration record, and admission agreement for Resident 1 (R1). It was alleged staff did not give resident medication as prescribed and staff did not keep resident’s authorized person informed about the resident’s care. During the investigation, LPA conducted interviews with staff and reviewed records obtained. The investigation determined as follows: Regarding the allegation staff did not give resident medication as prescribed, it was reported R1 had missed medication administration on more than 148 instances. Continued on 9099-C dated on 07/10/2025. SubstantCDSS inspection report, July 10, 2025 · control 22-AS-20250527184045
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident sustained multiple falls due to lack of care and supervision Facility failed to obtain timely medical attention for residents exhibiting medical distress Facility double billed residents Staff are discouraging other staff to report incidents involving residents in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 06/05/2025, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cassandra Mikkelson contacted the licensee via phone and email to deliver final findings regarding a complaint that was received on 03/26/2024. **Report continued on 9099-D page** UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 5, 2025 · control 22-AS-20240326103120

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident developed pressure injuries due to neglect Resident sustained an injury due to an unwitnessed fall
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On this day, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Andrea Mendivil made an unannounced visit to deliver complaint findings. LPA was greeted and granted entry into the facility Nurse Manager Sheila Weathers and explained the reason for the visit. The Department received a complaint on 12/01/2020 and the initial 10 day visit was conducted on 12/10/2020. LPA Mendivil conducted a follow up visit on 10/25/2023. LPA Mendivil obtained copies of documents including physicians report and medical records. Regarding the allegations Resident developed pressure injuries due to neglect and Resident sustained an injury due to an unwitnessed fall, the investigation revealed the following: Based on medical records dated from 11/16/2020 to 11/28/2020 it was reported on 11/17/2020 that Resident 1 (R1) was diagnosed with a stage 1 wound on coccyx. Based on interviews with 4 out of 4 staff all indicated that R1 did not have any wounds and did not have a history of skin breakdown, when R1 was sent out to the hospCDSS inspection report, February 26, 2024 · control 22-AS-20201201090430

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 20 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
2
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
8
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
20
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Regents Point?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Humangood & Humangood Socal, who operates 4 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(949) 854-9500
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Regents Point? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.