Cogir Of San Rafael is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Rafael, Marin County, California — state license #216804000, licensed for 70 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 42 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated April 23, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

19 homes in view

Cogir Of San Rafael

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 70 residents · San Rafael, CA · Marin County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #216804000, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
111 Merrydale Road · San Rafael, Marin County
Phone
(707) 334-1620
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 70 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 16 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 20 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 70 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 16State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 47 times and filed 42 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 23, 2026.

Most recent state visit
May 29, 2026
Occupancy at the June 5, 2025 visit
53 of 70 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 12 documents with transcribed findings, dated December 13, 2022 to June 5, 2025. 12 of the 12 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 12 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 12 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 28 of 42 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
Apr 23, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 30, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202515 state visits · 16 documents
Dec 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 4, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 28, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 31, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident roughly causing resident to fall Facility did not seek timely medical Facility did not report abuse to responsible party

At approximately 11:50AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to continue a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Business Office Director, Ditter Vasquez. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There are allegations that "Staff handled resident roughly causing resident to fall, Facility did not seek timely medical, and Facility did not report abuse to responsible party." Complainant alleged the following: Staff Member 1 (S1) roughly handled Resident 1 (R1) while providing care causing R1 to fall and hit their head, facility did not seek timely medical for R1 after the fall, and facility did not report abuse to R1's responsible party. Continued on LIC9099C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 5, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250401143349
Apr 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not assist resident with self-administration of medication Personal Rights

At approximately 1:50PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to deliver findings for this Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Executive Director, Kimberly Humphrey and Business Office Manager, Ditter Vazquez. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. The following allegations were investigated, “Staff did not assist in self-administration of medication, and Personal Rights.” “Staff did not assist in self-administration of medication” – Complainant alleged that facility staff refused to administer Resident 1 (R1’s) morphine medication when they were in extreme pain on 11/03/2025 and 11/04/2025. Complainant also alleged that facility staff forced R1 to take their morphine when they were dying even though R1’s family asked facility staff to not administer it. Continued on LIC9099 Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 28, 2025 · control 21-AS-20241108085658
Mar 25, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not provide residents with adequate food service Staff do not prepare meals in a sanitary manner Staff do not use soap to wash facility dishes Staff do not seek medical attention for residents in a timely manner

Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. Through interviews, document reviews and unannounced site visits, the following determinations are made: LPA Leibert made unannounced inspections of the kitchen and food service on 2/4/25, 2/27/25, and 3/13/25; Inspections found the dishwasher to be operative with adequate detergent on site; Interviewed staff deny using vinegar to clean dishes; Staff were observed following appropriate sanitation protocols; Facility menus comply with Title Twenty-Two regulations and inspections found food on hand to fulfill the menu requirements; Adequate beverages, snacks, and deserts were observed to be stocked; 2 out of 10 family members asked to comment on food service report satisfaction with the food served; Facility Care Notes for Resident (R1) indicate R1 was sent out on 11/30/24 when observed to be pale with breathing problems; R1 was noted to be at Baseline prior on 11/29; R1 remainthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 25, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250127130724
Mar 14, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility's emergency call system was in disrepair

At approximately 9:05AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to initiate a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with met with Executive Director/Administrator, Kimberly Humphrey. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There is an allegation of "Facility's emergency call system was in disrepair.” Complainant alleged that there were many occasions that the facility's pull cords were not functional and that facility staff were not receiving the calls on their pagers. Interview conducted with Executive Director stated that the facility's call system was not working approximately four weeks ago and was fully repaired this past Monday, 03/10/2025. Per Executive Director, Continued on LIC9099C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250306172541
Feb 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Reporting Requirements

At approximately 10:20AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to continue a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with met with Business Office Director, Ditter Vasquez. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There is an allegation of "Reporting Requirements.” Complainant alleged that facility did not submit a report to the Department regarding potential abuse. Further information provided to LPA indicated that the incident involved a medication error. Review of documents showed that the Department received a report involving the identified incident. Continued on LIC9099C Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 26, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250113133346
Feb 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 7, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 9, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20248 state visits · 9 documents
Oct 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not following doctor's orders for resident's wound care Staff is overcharging resident in care

At approximately 11:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to deliver findings for this Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Regional Executive Director, Davina Barker. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There is an allegation that “Staff is overcharging resident in care.” Complainant stated that Facility billed Resident 1 (R1) for a compression sleeve that R1 does not use or need. Complainant also alleged that the facility refused entry to the home health agency that was ordered to provide wound care and instead provided the wound care in the facility costing more money and more levels of care for the resident. Review of facility documents show that R1’s Physician ordered for them to have a compression leg machine and compression stockings dated 06/03/2021 and 05/17/2023. Continued on LIC9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 21, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240514163205
Aug 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide representative with an updated care plan with explanation of care charges Facility does not respond to representative timely

At approximately 12:50PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Felias and Loera arrived unannounced to deliver findings for this Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Regional Executive Director, Davina Barker, and Health and Wellness Director, Victoria Mozaffari. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There is an allegation that “Facility did not provide representative with an updated care plan with explanation of care charges.” Complainant stated that R1’s Responsible Party was being charged $100 per day for R1 to receive wound care treatment and that R1’s care increased from a Level 5 to a Level 9 with no explanation. Interview conducted with Facility’s Health and Wellness Director (HWD) stated that R1 was put on a Temporary Service Plan (TSP) in February 2024 due to increased care needs. Continued on LIC9099C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 8, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240424094747
Jul 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 2, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide responsible party with 30 day eviction notice.

At approximately 9:10AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to continue a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with Executive Director/Administrator, Susan Edwards. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There is an allegation that “Staff did not provide responsible party with 30 day eviction notice.” Complainant alleged that Resident 1 (R1) and their designated representatives conducted a meeting with the facility where it was discussed that R1 be relocated or discharged from the facility. Complainant stated that the facility did not provide R1 and their designated representatives with any documentation and did not use the word “eviction” and only used terms like “decision to relocate” or “discharge.” Complainant stated that facility did not provide R1 and their designated representatives with a written eviction notice. Continued on LIC9099Cthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 2, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240308152416
Apr 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnfounded

Allegation investigated: Resident has been issued an unlawful eviction

At approximately 1:00PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to initiate a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with Executive Director/Administrator, Susan Edwards. During the course of the Investigation, LPA requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There is an allegation of an Unlawful Eviction. Reporting Party stated that R1 and their Responsible Party had a verbal agreement with the former company of the facility, Sunrise Senior Living, where they were allowed to pay their rent one month late. This verbal agreement was continued when the facility was taken over by Cogir Senior Living in July 2021. Record Review showed that there is no written agreement between Cogir Senior Living Management and R1 and their Responsible Party agreeing to continuing this verbal agreement. Continued on LIC9099C Unfoundedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 14, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240205134542
Feb 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 29, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20231 state visit · 1 document
Oct 27, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations7typical 1
Type B citations5typical 1
Substantiated complaints12typical 2
Total complaints13typical 7
State visits on file47typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262202025151622024891202378220226612021110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$6,000$9,000 /mo
our estimate — Marin County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (707) 334-1620

Is Cogir Of San Rafael licensed?

Yes — Cogir Of San Rafael is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in San Rafael (Marin County): California license #216804000, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 70 residents. State records list 42 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 23, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Cogir Of San Rafael care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Cogir Of San Rafael with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 70 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 20 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. APPROVED HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 16

How much does Cogir Of San Rafael cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Cogir Of San Rafael's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Marin County typically runs $6,000–$9,000/mo and small board-and-care homes $5,000–$8,000/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Cogir Of San Rafael accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Cogir Of San Rafael is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

53 of 70 beds occupied (76%) when the state visited on June 5, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Cogir Of San Rafael?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 47 state visits and 42 dated documents since 2021 for Cogir Of San Rafael; 12 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated June 5, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

12 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handled resident roughly causing resident to fall Facility did not seek timely medical Facility did not report abuse to responsible party
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 11:50AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to continue a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Business Office Director, Ditter Vasquez. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There are allegations that "Staff handled resident roughly causing resident to fall, Facility did not seek timely medical, and Facility did not report abuse to responsible party." Complainant alleged the following: Staff Member 1 (S1) roughly handled Resident 1 (R1) while providing care causing R1 to fall and hit their head, facility did not seek timely medical for R1 after the fall, and facility did not report abuse to R1's responsible party. Continued on LIC9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 5, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250401143349
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not assist resident with self-administration of medication Personal Rights
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 1:50PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to deliver findings for this Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Executive Director, Kimberly Humphrey and Business Office Manager, Ditter Vazquez. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. The following allegations were investigated, “Staff did not assist in self-administration of medication, and Personal Rights.” “Staff did not assist in self-administration of medication” – Complainant alleged that facility staff refused to administer Resident 1 (R1’s) morphine medication when they were in extreme pain on 11/03/2025 and 11/04/2025. Complainant also alleged that facility staff forced R1 to take their morphine when they were dying even though R1’s family asked facility staff to not administer it. Continued on LIC9099 UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 28, 2025 · control 21-AS-20241108085658
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not provide residents with adequate food service Staff do not prepare meals in a sanitary manner Staff do not use soap to wash facility dishes Staff do not seek medical attention for residents in a timely manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst Leibert arrived unannounced for the purpose of delivering findings on this complaint. Through interviews, document reviews and unannounced site visits, the following determinations are made: LPA Leibert made unannounced inspections of the kitchen and food service on 2/4/25, 2/27/25, and 3/13/25; Inspections found the dishwasher to be operative with adequate detergent on site; Interviewed staff deny using vinegar to clean dishes; Staff were observed following appropriate sanitation protocols; Facility menus comply with Title Twenty-Two regulations and inspections found food on hand to fulfill the menu requirements; Adequate beverages, snacks, and deserts were observed to be stocked; 2 out of 10 family members asked to comment on food service report satisfaction with the food served; Facility Care Notes for Resident (R1) indicate R1 was sent out on 11/30/24 when observed to be pale with breathing problems; R1 was noted to be at Baseline prior on 11/29; R1 remainCDSS inspection report, March 25, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250127130724
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility's emergency call system was in disrepair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 9:05AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to initiate a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with met with Executive Director/Administrator, Kimberly Humphrey. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There is an allegation of "Facility's emergency call system was in disrepair.” Complainant alleged that there were many occasions that the facility's pull cords were not functional and that facility staff were not receiving the calls on their pagers. Interview conducted with Executive Director stated that the facility's call system was not working approximately four weeks ago and was fully repaired this past Monday, 03/10/2025. Per Executive Director, Continued on LIC9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 14, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250306172541
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedReporting Requirements
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
At approximately 10:20AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to continue a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with met with Business Office Director, Ditter Vasquez. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There is an allegation of "Reporting Requirements.” Complainant alleged that facility did not submit a report to the Department regarding potential abuse. Further information provided to LPA indicated that the incident involved a medication error. Review of documents showed that the Department received a report involving the identified incident. Continued on LIC9099C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, February 26, 2025 · control 21-AS-20250113133346

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is not following doctor's orders for resident's wound care Staff is overcharging resident in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 11:30AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to deliver findings for this Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Regional Executive Director, Davina Barker. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There is an allegation that “Staff is overcharging resident in care.” Complainant stated that Facility billed Resident 1 (R1) for a compression sleeve that R1 does not use or need. Complainant also alleged that the facility refused entry to the home health agency that was ordered to provide wound care and instead provided the wound care in the facility costing more money and more levels of care for the resident. Review of facility documents show that R1’s Physician ordered for them to have a compression leg machine and compression stockings dated 06/03/2021 and 05/17/2023. Continued on LIC9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 21, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240514163205
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not provide representative with an updated care plan with explanation of care charges Facility does not respond to representative timely
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 12:50PM, Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Felias and Loera arrived unannounced to deliver findings for this Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Regional Executive Director, Davina Barker, and Health and Wellness Director, Victoria Mozaffari. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There is an allegation that “Facility did not provide representative with an updated care plan with explanation of care charges.” Complainant stated that R1’s Responsible Party was being charged $100 per day for R1 to receive wound care treatment and that R1’s care increased from a Level 5 to a Level 9 with no explanation. Interview conducted with Facility’s Health and Wellness Director (HWD) stated that R1 was put on a Temporary Service Plan (TSP) in February 2024 due to increased care needs. Continued on LIC9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, August 8, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240424094747
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide responsible party with 30 day eviction notice.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 9:10AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to continue a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with Executive Director/Administrator, Susan Edwards. During the course of the investigation, the Department requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There is an allegation that “Staff did not provide responsible party with 30 day eviction notice.” Complainant alleged that Resident 1 (R1) and their designated representatives conducted a meeting with the facility where it was discussed that R1 be relocated or discharged from the facility. Complainant stated that the facility did not provide R1 and their designated representatives with any documentation and did not use the word “eviction” and only used terms like “decision to relocate” or “discharge.” Complainant stated that facility did not provide R1 and their designated representatives with a written eviction notice. Continued on LIC9099CCDSS inspection report, May 2, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240308152416
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedResident has been issued an unlawful eviction
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
At approximately 1:00PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived unannounced to initiate a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with Executive Director/Administrator, Susan Edwards. During the course of the Investigation, LPA requested and reviewed documents, conducted interviews, and made observations. There is an allegation of an Unlawful Eviction. Reporting Party stated that R1 and their Responsible Party had a verbal agreement with the former company of the facility, Sunrise Senior Living, where they were allowed to pay their rent one month late. This verbal agreement was continued when the facility was taken over by Cogir Senior Living in July 2021. Record Review showed that there is no written agreement between Cogir Senior Living Management and R1 and their Responsible Party agreeing to continuing this verbal agreement. Continued on LIC9099C UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, February 14, 2024 · control 21-AS-20240205134542

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff storing items in resident's refrigerator
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 9:20AM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias arrived uannnounced to continue a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegation and met with Executive Director/Administrator, Susan Edwards. During the course of the investigation, LPA reviewed and requested documents, made observations, and conducted interviews. There is an allegation that Staff are storing items in resident’s refrigerator. Report states that in September 2022, an opened and frozen alcoholic beverage was found in Resident 1’s (R1's) freezer. Pictures provided to LPA confirmed that an alcoholic beverage was presented to staff. Interviews conducted confirmed that an alcoholic beverage was found on the facility premises where it was accessible to Residents in Care and that Staff and Facility Management were notified. Interviews conducted indicated that residents are only allowed to have alcohol if they have a Physician’s Order. If a Resident can have alcohol, it is stored inaccessible to residentsCDSS inspection report, July 14, 2023 · control 21-AS-20230502105424
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedPersonal Rights - resident was sexually assaulted while in care Neglect Lack of Supervision - facility failed to seek timely medical attention for resident in care Reporting Requirement - facility failed to report incident timely per regulations
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At approximately 12:30PM, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Felias, arrived unannounced to deliver findings for a Complaint Investigation regarding the above allegations and met with Administrator, Susan Edwards. There is an allegation of Personal Rights - Resident was sexually assaulted while in care. The afternoon of Sunday, September 4, 2022, Staff Member 1 (S1), entered Resident’s 1 (R1), room to put their clean laundry away. R1 was in their bedroom naked from the waist down. S1 found staff member 2 (S2) hiding behind the shower curtain in R1’s bathroom. The incident was reported to management. A report was made to San Rafael Police Department (SRPD) that evening, but an Officer did not come out until the following day. R1 was taken to the Emergency Room, and a Sexual Assault Rape Team (SART) exam was conducted. A male profile was found. SRPD obtained a Buccal swab from S2. S2 was interviewed and denied touching R1. Continued on LIC9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, June 2, 2023 · control 21-AS-20220912115756

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 47 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
7
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
5
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
12
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
13
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
47
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(707) 334-1620
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Cogir Of San Rafael? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.