Savant Of Alhambra is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Alhambra, Los Angeles County, California — state license #198603597, licensed for 176 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 27 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2023, the most recent dated June 30, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Savant Of Alhambra

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 176 residents · Alhambra, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #198603597, held since 2023 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1 E Commonwealth Ave · Alhambra, Los Angeles County
Phone
(626) 289-3871
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 176 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careApproved for 30 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 10 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 176 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ROOMS 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 152, 153, 154, 155 AND 156 APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 30.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2023, the state has visited this home 32 times and filed 27 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 30, 2026.

Most recent state visit
June 30, 2026
Occupancy at the February 20, 2026 visit
141 of 176 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 16 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 12, 2024 to February 20, 2026. 16 of the 16 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (6), “Unsubstantiated” (10). 16 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 16 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 25 of 27 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20266 state visits · 6 documents
Jun 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 12, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 10, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 20, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee did not follow proper eviction protocols with resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez conducted an unannounced initial visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA me with Business Office Manager Rugy Andrade and discussed purpose of the visit. Administrator Madaleine “Maddie” Seivert arrived a short time later and assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA interviewing seven (7) staff (S#1 – S#7 and ten (10) residents (R#1-R#10), reviewing and obtaining staff and resident rosters, R1 admission agreement, physicians report, needs and appraisal, and Acknowledgement of discharge form dated 10/24/2025. The investigation revealed regarding allegation: Licensee did not follow proper eviction protocols with resident in care. It is alleged that resident was evicted without proper notice. LPA interviewed seven (7) staff, and all seven (7) staff denied the allegation. All staff stated the resident self-discharged and signed Acknowledgment of Discharge form showing that on 10/28/2024. LPA interviewed ten (10) residethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260211155418
Jan 17, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that the facility was kept free of pests

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez conducted a subsequent unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Blanca Soliz, Resident Services Supervisor and discussed the purpose of the visit. On 01/13/2026 - Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez conducted a 10-day complaint visit at the facility and met with Madeleine Sievert, Administrator, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Investigation consisted of reviewing and obtaining staff roster, resident roster, R1 face sheet and medical assessment, interviewing six (6) staff, interviewing ten (10) residents, walked around and toured the facility and random rooms. Allegation: Staff did not ensure that the facility was kept free of pests. It is alleged that resident’s room is infested with roaches and staff does not ensure it is kept free of pest. (Continued on 9099C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260105100911
202511 state visits · 12 documents
Sep 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure resident's bandages were changed.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Administrator Madeline Sievert and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA Interviewing five (5) staff S#1 – S#5, 10 (ten) residents R#1 – R#10, one (1) witness W#reviewing and obtaining staff and resident rosters, R1 Physicians Report for Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly (RCFE), Communication log dated 09/19/2025 with instructions for catheter, outside agency documentation from Home Health documenting service provided for R1, Physician’s order for R1 asking for increase in skill nursing visits for R1 to change and clean around catheter port dated 09/19/2025. Readmission of Care for Home Health dated 09/10/2025. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250918052014
Jul 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not meet resident's basic needs due to insufficient staffing. Staff do not keep resident's room clean & sanitary.

**This LIC 9099/LIC 9099C/LIC 9099D supersedes the LIC 9099/LIC 9099C/LIC 9099D that was issued on 05/16/25** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicol Wesley conducted a subsequent visit at the facility and met with Administrator Madeleine Sievert to discuss the purpose of the visit. Investigation consisted of: staff roster, resident roster, incontinence records, house keeping records, interviewed 3 staff, interviewed 15 residents, walked around and toured the facility. Investigation revealed: Regarding allegation: Staff do not meet resident's basic needs due to insufficient staffing, and Staff do not keep resident's room clean & sanitary. On 04/03/25, LPA Wesley and the Administrator Madeleine Sievert toured the facility and found that several rooms were not cleaned Room #104, 105, 108,113, 123, 134, 135, 152 & 230. LPA asked the administrator how many staff were on duty and she provided me with the names 2 med technicians, 5 caregivers, 2 housekeepers, and 1 laundry attendant on duty. Lthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250327140118
Jul 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 23, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is mismanaging resident's medications. Staff does not ensure resident's medical needs are being met. Staff does not ensure resident's grooming needs are being met. Staff does not ensure facility food is free of bugs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nune Margaryan conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings to the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with Administrator Madeline Sievert and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 05/19/25 LPA Nune Margaryan interviewed Staff 1 - Staff 5 (S1-S5), Resident 1 - Resident 14 (R1-R14), obtained copies of staff and residents rosters, reviewed the medication logs for five (5) different residents including R1's. The following documents pertaining to R1 were obtained: Admission Agreement, Identification and emergency Information, Face Sheet, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Physician’s Report, Physician's Order, Resident assessment/ Care Plan, Medication Administration Record. LPA also conducted a tour of facility including kitchen and dining area. LPA observed that there is a sign in the kitchen for recent food inspection with grade "A" and the sign at the front desk for Sing up to seethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 3, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250512161006
May 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff do not meet resident's basic needs due to insufficient staffing. Staff do not keep resident's room clean & sanitary.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicol Wesley conducted a subsequent visit at the facility and met with Administrator Madeleine Sievert to discuss the purpose of the visit. Investigation consisted of: staff roster, resident roster, incontinence records, house keeping records, interviewed staff, interviewed residents, walked around and toured the facility. Investigation revealed: Regarding allegation: Staff do not meet resident's basic needs due to insufficient staffing, and Staff do not keep resident's room clean & sanitary. on 04/03/25, LPA Wesley and the Administrator Madeleine Sievert toured the facility and found that several rooms were not cleaned. LPA asked the administrator how many staff were on duty and she provided me with the names 2 med technicians, 5 caregivers, 2 housekeepers, and 1 laundry attendant on duty. LPA visited random clients rooms and found that the trash was not Continued on LIC 9099C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 16, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250327140118
Apr 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Allegation: Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made an unannounced initial visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Regional Director Lisa Pham and Administrator Madeline Sievert and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA interviewing six (6) staff and eleven (11) residents. Taking tour of facility, reviewing and obtaining staff and resident rosters, R1 face sheet, R1 Physicians report, R1 Admission agreement, and resident service refusal log. The investigation revealed: Allegation, Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs. It is alleged the facility has failed to provide proper hygiene services to R1, that R1 was observed with dead skin on body and mold fuzz between R1 toes. (continue on 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 28, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250421133503
Apr 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility Elevators in disrepair causing delays in emergency medical response to residents

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christian Gutierrez conducted an unannounced complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA was met by Administrator Madeleine Sievert and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Gutierrez did an inspection of facility elevators located in the front lobby and in garage, requested and obtained copies of staff roster, resident roster, elevator repair receipts, firefighters service operation log, and hydraulic maintenance tasks. LPA conducted interviews with Administrator, staff 1- staff 6 (S1-S6), and residents 1 – 6 (R1-R6). SEE 9099C Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 10, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250402110122
Apr 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 18, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff does not provide adequate food service to resident in care. Facility does not provide adequate toileting supplies. Facility staff does not provide adequate housekeeping services.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made subsequent visit to the facility for the purpose of continuing investigation and delivering findings for above-mentioned allegations. LPA Lopez met with Maddie Sievert, Administrator and explained the purpose for the visit. 02/28/2025 During the visit, LPA interviewed two residents (2) and one (1) staff and reviewed and obtained copies of staff and resident rosters. The investigation consisted of: LPA taking tour of facility including dining area, random rooms and common areas. LPA reviewed and obtained staff and resident rosters. Copy of food menu, interviews with six (6) staff (S#1-S#6) and twelve (12) residents (R#1-R#12) The investigation revealed, Allegation: Facility staff does not provide adequate food service to resident in care. It is alleged that facility does not provide seconds of food servings to residents or seconds of dessert when residents ask. (continue on 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250221164219
Feb 28, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are mismanaging residents medication Staff are not responding to residents call buttons in a timely manner Staff are not following infectious control requirements Staff did not prevent residents from wandering from the facility Staff did not provide resident's medical records to physician Staff are not meeting residents dietary needs Staff did not ensure elevators were not in disrepair Staff are not fixing things in a timely manner Staff are not meeting residents needs

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made subsequent visit at the facility for the purpose of continuing investigation and delivering findings for above-mentioned allegations. LPA Lopez met with Maddie Sievert, Interim Administrator and explained the purpose for the visit. On 02/04/2025 - The investigation consisted of interviews with seven (7) staff (S#1-S#7), nine (9) residents (R#1-R#9). LPA reviewed and obtained, R5 MAR for month of January 2025, reviewed and obtained staff and resident rosters, reviewed medications for R5, and asked facility to send R5 LIC602 and admission agreement. LPA interview total of eight (8) staff and ten (10) residents and reviewed and obtained medication destruction record for S5 medications that were missing. LPA inspected the elevators and room 147 bathrooms. (continued on 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 28, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250130091414
Jan 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident medication. Facility staff left resident in soiled diaper for an extended amount of time.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a complaint investigation on the allegations listed above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with Maddie Sievert, the interim Executive Director. The reason for the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of the resident and staff rosters. LPA also reviewed Resident #1’s file and interviewed Staff and Residents. Resident #1 is no longer residing at the facility and was not interviewed. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation – Staff mismanaged resident medication. It is alleged that Resident #1’s medication was last given on 12/24/24. On 12/25/24, staff could not find the medications that had been delivered the day before. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 3, 2025 · control 28-AS-20241227161938
20247 state visits · 7 documents
Nov 25, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 8, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure correct medications were dispensed to resident Staff did not ensure medications were dispensed in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made subsequent visit to complete investigation and deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Lisa Pham and discussed the purpose of the visit. On 09/20/2024, LPA made visit and met with Business Manager Ruby Andrade. During this visit LPA interviewed four (4) staff, one (1) witness and eight (8) residents, LPA reviewed R1 file, R1 MAR for month of July 2024, reviewed and obtained staff and resident rosters, controlled substance medication record for July 1 – July 25, 2024 for R1, copy of prescription for R1, San Gabriel Valley Medical Center Discharge paperwork for R1 dated 07/27/2024, 8-hour medication training certificates for staff dated 08/02/2024, SIR dated 7/27/2024, shower refusal log for R1,LIC602, and Admissions agreement. On 10/08/2024 LPA interviewed S7 and S8 and attempted to interview S5. S5 stated she was unable to answer any question due to being too busy and LPA was unable to interview S5. (continued on 9099-C) Substantithe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 8, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240904092531
Sep 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff not assisting resident with attending dialysis appointments as required

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at the facility for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned allegation. LPA Lopez met with Ruby Andrade, Business Manager and explained the purpose for the visit. Administrator Lisa Pham arrived a few minutes later and assisted with the visit. On previous visit on 08/26/2024 LPA Lopez obtained a copy of the resident/staff roster. Toured common areas and Interviewed one (1) Staff (S#1) The investigation consisted of LPA interviewing four (4) staff and eight (8) residents. LPA reviewed and obtained 3 SIR dated 08/19/2024, 08/21/2024, and 08/23/2024 in which department is notified of R1 refusal to go to dialysis, progress notes from 08/14/2024 to 09/3/2024, R1 LIC602, and R1 History and Physical dated 08/22/2024. (Continued on 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240823100907
Jun 10, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair

This report supersedes report dated 03/14/24 , the reason for the subsequent visit is to correct the citation issued on 3/14/24 and the finding will remain the same.** On previous visit Licensing Program Manager made unannounced visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Ruby Andrade, Business Office Manager and discussed the purpose of the visit. Administrator Lisa Pham arrived later during the visit. Allegation: Facility is unsanitary. it is alleged that facility is very uncleaned that there may be a food shortage. The investigation consisted of interviews with Twelve (12) staff S#1-S#12 and thirteen (13) residents (R#1- #13) residents, tour of all three floors, corridors, hallways, restrooms on all 3 floors, 13 random rooms, and reviewed staff and resident roosters. (Continued 9099C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240311164325
Mar 14, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is unsanitary.

Licensing Program Manager made unannounced visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Ruby Andrade, Business Office Manager and discussed the purpose of the visit. Administrator Lisa Pham arrived later during the visit. Allegation: Facility is unsanitary. it is alleged that facility is very uncleaned that there may be a food shortage. The investigation consisted of interviews with Twelve (12) staff S#1-S#12 and thirteen (13) residents (R#1- #13) residents, tour of all three floors, corridors, hallways, restrooms on all 3 floors, 13 random rooms, and reviewed staff and resident roosters. (Continued 809) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 14, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240311164325
Mar 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not showering residents timely Staff are not changing residents timely Staff are not assisting residents with medications timely Staff are not providing residents with basic hygiene products

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted an unannounced complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Wellness Coordinator, Madeleine Sievert who assisted with the visit. Administrator, Lisa Pham arrived at the facility later, and also assisted with the visit. Regarding the allegation that : Staff are not showering residents timely. The investigation consisted of interviews with Administrator, Staff #1- Staff #7, and Resident #1- Resident #7. LPA also reviewed caregiver assignment sheets with shower schedule. Staff interviewed did not corroborate the allegation. Six out of eight staff interviewed stated that staff do shower residents timely. Residents interviewed were not able to corroborate the allegation. Seven out of seven residents stated that either they do not need assistance with showering or they do receive assistance timely. Regarding the allegation that : Staff are not changing residents timely. The investigation consisted of interviews wthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 12, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240305095603
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints6typical 2
Total complaints17typical 7
State visits on file32typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2023.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated202666120251112220247732023330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (626) 289-3871

Is Savant Of Alhambra licensed?

Yes — Savant Of Alhambra is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Alhambra (Los Angeles County): California license #198603597, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 176 residents. State records list 27 inspection and complaint documents since 2023; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 30, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Savant Of Alhambra care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Savant Of Alhambra with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. 176 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 10 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. ROOMS 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 152, 153, 154, 155 AND 156 APPROVED FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 30.

How much does Savant Of Alhambra cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Savant Of Alhambra's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Savant Of Alhambra accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Savant Of Alhambra through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Los Angeles County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

141 of 176 beds occupied (80%) when the state visited on February 20, 2026. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Savant Of Alhambra?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 32 state visits and 27 dated documents since 2023 for Savant Of Alhambra; 16 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated February 20, 2026, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

16 transcribed reports on file

2026

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee did not follow proper eviction protocols with resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez conducted an unannounced initial visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA me with Business Office Manager Rugy Andrade and discussed purpose of the visit. Administrator Madaleine “Maddie” Seivert arrived a short time later and assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA interviewing seven (7) staff (S#1 – S#7 and ten (10) residents (R#1-R#10), reviewing and obtaining staff and resident rosters, R1 admission agreement, physicians report, needs and appraisal, and Acknowledgement of discharge form dated 10/24/2025. The investigation revealed regarding allegation: Licensee did not follow proper eviction protocols with resident in care. It is alleged that resident was evicted without proper notice. LPA interviewed seven (7) staff, and all seven (7) staff denied the allegation. All staff stated the resident self-discharged and signed Acknowledgment of Discharge form showing that on 10/28/2024. LPA interviewed ten (10) resideCDSS inspection report, February 20, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260211155418
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that the facility was kept free of pests
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez conducted a subsequent unannounced visit to deliver findings for the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Blanca Soliz, Resident Services Supervisor and discussed the purpose of the visit. On 01/13/2026 - Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez conducted a 10-day complaint visit at the facility and met with Madeleine Sievert, Administrator, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Investigation consisted of reviewing and obtaining staff roster, resident roster, R1 face sheet and medical assessment, interviewing six (6) staff, interviewing ten (10) residents, walked around and toured the facility and random rooms. Allegation: Staff did not ensure that the facility was kept free of pests. It is alleged that resident’s room is infested with roaches and staff does not ensure it is kept free of pest. (Continued on 9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 17, 2026 · control 28-AS-20260105100911

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure resident's bandages were changed.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above-mentioned allegation. LPA met with Administrator Madeline Sievert and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA Interviewing five (5) staff S#1 – S#5, 10 (ten) residents R#1 – R#10, one (1) witness W#reviewing and obtaining staff and resident rosters, R1 Physicians Report for Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly (RCFE), Communication log dated 09/19/2025 with instructions for catheter, outside agency documentation from Home Health documenting service provided for R1, Physician’s order for R1 asking for increase in skill nursing visits for R1 to change and clean around catheter port dated 09/19/2025. Readmission of Care for Home Health dated 09/10/2025. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 23, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250918052014
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not meet resident's basic needs due to insufficient staffing. Staff do not keep resident's room clean & sanitary.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
**This LIC 9099/LIC 9099C/LIC 9099D supersedes the LIC 9099/LIC 9099C/LIC 9099D that was issued on 05/16/25** Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicol Wesley conducted a subsequent visit at the facility and met with Administrator Madeleine Sievert to discuss the purpose of the visit. Investigation consisted of: staff roster, resident roster, incontinence records, house keeping records, interviewed 3 staff, interviewed 15 residents, walked around and toured the facility. Investigation revealed: Regarding allegation: Staff do not meet resident's basic needs due to insufficient staffing, and Staff do not keep resident's room clean & sanitary. On 04/03/25, LPA Wesley and the Administrator Madeleine Sievert toured the facility and found that several rooms were not cleaned Room #104, 105, 108,113, 123, 134, 135, 152 & 230. LPA asked the administrator how many staff were on duty and she provided me with the names 2 med technicians, 5 caregivers, 2 housekeepers, and 1 laundry attendant on duty. LCDSS inspection report, July 10, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250327140118
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is mismanaging resident's medications. Staff does not ensure resident's medical needs are being met. Staff does not ensure resident's grooming needs are being met. Staff does not ensure facility food is free of bugs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nune Margaryan conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint visit to deliver findings to the above mentioned allegations. LPA met with Administrator Madeline Sievert and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 05/19/25 LPA Nune Margaryan interviewed Staff 1 - Staff 5 (S1-S5), Resident 1 - Resident 14 (R1-R14), obtained copies of staff and residents rosters, reviewed the medication logs for five (5) different residents including R1's. The following documents pertaining to R1 were obtained: Admission Agreement, Identification and emergency Information, Face Sheet, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Physician’s Report, Physician's Order, Resident assessment/ Care Plan, Medication Administration Record. LPA also conducted a tour of facility including kitchen and dining area. LPA observed that there is a sign in the kitchen for recent food inspection with grade "A" and the sign at the front desk for Sing up to seeCDSS inspection report, June 3, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250512161006
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not meet resident's basic needs due to insufficient staffing. Staff do not keep resident's room clean & sanitary.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicol Wesley conducted a subsequent visit at the facility and met with Administrator Madeleine Sievert to discuss the purpose of the visit. Investigation consisted of: staff roster, resident roster, incontinence records, house keeping records, interviewed staff, interviewed residents, walked around and toured the facility. Investigation revealed: Regarding allegation: Staff do not meet resident's basic needs due to insufficient staffing, and Staff do not keep resident's room clean & sanitary. on 04/03/25, LPA Wesley and the Administrator Madeleine Sievert toured the facility and found that several rooms were not cleaned. LPA asked the administrator how many staff were on duty and she provided me with the names 2 med technicians, 5 caregivers, 2 housekeepers, and 1 laundry attendant on duty. LPA visited random clients rooms and found that the trash was not Continued on LIC 9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 16, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250327140118
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedAllegation: Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made an unannounced initial visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Regional Director Lisa Pham and Administrator Madeline Sievert and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA interviewing six (6) staff and eleven (11) residents. Taking tour of facility, reviewing and obtaining staff and resident rosters, R1 face sheet, R1 Physicians report, R1 Admission agreement, and resident service refusal log. The investigation revealed: Allegation, Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs. It is alleged the facility has failed to provide proper hygiene services to R1, that R1 was observed with dead skin on body and mold fuzz between R1 toes. (continue on 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 28, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250421133503
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility Elevators in disrepair causing delays in emergency medical response to residents
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christian Gutierrez conducted an unannounced complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA was met by Administrator Madeleine Sievert and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Gutierrez did an inspection of facility elevators located in the front lobby and in garage, requested and obtained copies of staff roster, resident roster, elevator repair receipts, firefighters service operation log, and hydraulic maintenance tasks. LPA conducted interviews with Administrator, staff 1- staff 6 (S1-S6), and residents 1 – 6 (R1-R6). SEE 9099C UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 10, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250402110122
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff does not provide adequate food service to resident in care. Facility does not provide adequate toileting supplies. Facility staff does not provide adequate housekeeping services.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made subsequent visit to the facility for the purpose of continuing investigation and delivering findings for above-mentioned allegations. LPA Lopez met with Maddie Sievert, Administrator and explained the purpose for the visit. 02/28/2025 During the visit, LPA interviewed two residents (2) and one (1) staff and reviewed and obtained copies of staff and resident rosters. The investigation consisted of: LPA taking tour of facility including dining area, random rooms and common areas. LPA reviewed and obtained staff and resident rosters. Copy of food menu, interviews with six (6) staff (S#1-S#6) and twelve (12) residents (R#1-R#12) The investigation revealed, Allegation: Facility staff does not provide adequate food service to resident in care. It is alleged that facility does not provide seconds of food servings to residents or seconds of dessert when residents ask. (continue on 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 18, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250221164219
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are mismanaging residents medication Staff are not responding to residents call buttons in a timely manner Staff are not following infectious control requirements Staff did not prevent residents from wandering from the facility Staff did not provide resident's medical records to physician Staff are not meeting residents dietary needs Staff did not ensure elevators were not in disrepair Staff are not fixing things in a timely manner Staff are not meeting residents needs
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made subsequent visit at the facility for the purpose of continuing investigation and delivering findings for above-mentioned allegations. LPA Lopez met with Maddie Sievert, Interim Administrator and explained the purpose for the visit. On 02/04/2025 - The investigation consisted of interviews with seven (7) staff (S#1-S#7), nine (9) residents (R#1-R#9). LPA reviewed and obtained, R5 MAR for month of January 2025, reviewed and obtained staff and resident rosters, reviewed medications for R5, and asked facility to send R5 LIC602 and admission agreement. LPA interview total of eight (8) staff and ten (10) residents and reviewed and obtained medication destruction record for S5 medications that were missing. LPA inspected the elevators and room 147 bathrooms. (continued on 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 28, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250130091414
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged resident medication. Facility staff left resident in soiled diaper for an extended amount of time.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted a complaint investigation on the allegations listed above. LPA arrived unannounced and met with Maddie Sievert, the interim Executive Director. The reason for the visit was explained. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA obtained copies of the resident and staff rosters. LPA also reviewed Resident #1’s file and interviewed Staff and Residents. Resident #1 is no longer residing at the facility and was not interviewed. The investigation revealed the following: Allegation – Staff mismanaged resident medication. It is alleged that Resident #1’s medication was last given on 12/24/24. On 12/25/24, staff could not find the medications that had been delivered the day before. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 3, 2025 · control 28-AS-20241227161938

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure correct medications were dispensed to resident Staff did not ensure medications were dispensed in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made subsequent visit to complete investigation and deliver findings. LPA met with Administrator Lisa Pham and discussed the purpose of the visit. On 09/20/2024, LPA made visit and met with Business Manager Ruby Andrade. During this visit LPA interviewed four (4) staff, one (1) witness and eight (8) residents, LPA reviewed R1 file, R1 MAR for month of July 2024, reviewed and obtained staff and resident rosters, controlled substance medication record for July 1 – July 25, 2024 for R1, copy of prescription for R1, San Gabriel Valley Medical Center Discharge paperwork for R1 dated 07/27/2024, 8-hour medication training certificates for staff dated 08/02/2024, SIR dated 7/27/2024, shower refusal log for R1,LIC602, and Admissions agreement. On 10/08/2024 LPA interviewed S7 and S8 and attempted to interview S5. S5 stated she was unable to answer any question due to being too busy and LPA was unable to interview S5. (continued on 9099-C) SubstantiCDSS inspection report, October 8, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240904092531
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff not assisting resident with attending dialysis appointments as required
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at the facility for the purpose of investigating the above-mentioned allegation. LPA Lopez met with Ruby Andrade, Business Manager and explained the purpose for the visit. Administrator Lisa Pham arrived a few minutes later and assisted with the visit. On previous visit on 08/26/2024 LPA Lopez obtained a copy of the resident/staff roster. Toured common areas and Interviewed one (1) Staff (S#1) The investigation consisted of LPA interviewing four (4) staff and eight (8) residents. LPA reviewed and obtained 3 SIR dated 08/19/2024, 08/21/2024, and 08/23/2024 in which department is notified of R1 refusal to go to dialysis, progress notes from 08/14/2024 to 09/3/2024, R1 LIC602, and R1 History and Physical dated 08/22/2024. (Continued on 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 3, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240823100907
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This report supersedes report dated 03/14/24 , the reason for the subsequent visit is to correct the citation issued on 3/14/24 and the finding will remain the same.** On previous visit Licensing Program Manager made unannounced visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Ruby Andrade, Business Office Manager and discussed the purpose of the visit. Administrator Lisa Pham arrived later during the visit. Allegation: Facility is unsanitary. it is alleged that facility is very uncleaned that there may be a food shortage. The investigation consisted of interviews with Twelve (12) staff S#1-S#12 and thirteen (13) residents (R#1- #13) residents, tour of all three floors, corridors, hallways, restrooms on all 3 floors, 13 random rooms, and reviewed staff and resident roosters. (Continued 9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 3, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240311164325
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is unsanitary.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Manager made unannounced visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Ruby Andrade, Business Office Manager and discussed the purpose of the visit. Administrator Lisa Pham arrived later during the visit. Allegation: Facility is unsanitary. it is alleged that facility is very uncleaned that there may be a food shortage. The investigation consisted of interviews with Twelve (12) staff S#1-S#12 and thirteen (13) residents (R#1- #13) residents, tour of all three floors, corridors, hallways, restrooms on all 3 floors, 13 random rooms, and reviewed staff and resident roosters. (Continued 809) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 14, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240311164325
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not showering residents timely Staff are not changing residents timely Staff are not assisting residents with medications timely Staff are not providing residents with basic hygiene products
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted an unannounced complaint investigation regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Wellness Coordinator, Madeleine Sievert who assisted with the visit. Administrator, Lisa Pham arrived at the facility later, and also assisted with the visit. Regarding the allegation that : Staff are not showering residents timely. The investigation consisted of interviews with Administrator, Staff #1- Staff #7, and Resident #1- Resident #7. LPA also reviewed caregiver assignment sheets with shower schedule. Staff interviewed did not corroborate the allegation. Six out of eight staff interviewed stated that staff do shower residents timely. Residents interviewed were not able to corroborate the allegation. Seven out of seven residents stated that either they do not need assistance with showering or they do receive assistance timely. Regarding the allegation that : Staff are not changing residents timely. The investigation consisted of interviews wCDSS inspection report, March 12, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240305095603

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 32 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
17
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
32
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(626) 289-3871
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Savant Of Alhambra? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.