Astoria Park Senior Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Pasadena, Los Angeles County, California — state license #198603566, licensed for 220 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 70 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated June 23, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

3 homes in view

Astoria Park Senior Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 220 residents · Pasadena, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairBedriddenMemory care not on fileHospice not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #198603566, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
925 East Villa Street · Pasadena, Los Angeles County
Phone
(626) 796-4303
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 116 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careApproved for 104 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 104 AMBULATORY AND 116 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 104 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE CARE WIAVER FOR 25 RESIDENTS.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 84 times and filed 70 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated June 23, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 15, 2026
Occupancy at the December 6, 2025 visit
147 of 220 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 15 documents with transcribed findings, dated May 13, 2023 to December 6, 2025. 15 of the 15 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (7), “Unsubstantiated” (8). 15 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 15 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 67 of 70 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
202612 state visits · 17 documents
Jun 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jun 8, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 22, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 4, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 28, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 26, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 16, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 23, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 12, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 6, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 30, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

202528 state visits · 30 documents
Dec 29, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 16, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not respond to resident's call button in a timely manner. Staff left resident on the floor for an extended period of time.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made subsequent unannounced visit to deliver finding for the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Stasha Provitt, Community Liason Director and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed seven (7) staff total (S#1 – S#7) and Eleven (11) residents (R#1 -R#11) On 11/24/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Karine Tomassian, Admissions Coordinator, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA taking a tour of facility common area and random rooms, reviewing and obtaining staff and resident roosters, schedule for November 7, 2025, call light log for November 7, 2025, interviews with five (5) staff and Eleven (11) residents. Due to lack of information, requires needs further investigation, LPA will return another day. (Continued on 9099C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 6, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251119194926
Dec 5, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining multiple pressure injuries. Lack of supervision let to multiple falls resulting in injuries Staff did not address a resident's change in medical condition. Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident. Staff did not ensure a resident consumed an appropriate amount of liquid while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made a subsequent visit to facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Michelle Castillo, Business Office Manager, and discussed the purpose of the visit. 11/25/2024 - Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Stephanie Funderburg, Administrator, and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested a copy of staff/resident roster. LPA conducted a health and safety check tour of the facility and observed commercial kitchen, common areas, and 13 residents’ randomly chosen rooms. There are sufficient food supplies for at least 2 days of perishables, and 7 days of non-perishables. (Continued on 9099C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 2, 2025 · control 28-AS-20241122160546
Nov 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not administering residents' medications as prescribed

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christian Gutierrez conducted a subsequent complain visit in regard to the allegations listed above. LPA met with Community Director Stasha Provitt who assisted with today’s visit. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit conducted on 11/06/2025, LPA interviewed Executive Director, Staff 1-staff 3 (s1-S3) and residents 2- residents 10 (R2-R10). LPA obtained copies of the following documents: Staff roster, resident roster, R1’s physicians reports, identification information (LIC 601), orders for medication, hospital discharge paperwork with updated medication, and Medication distribution log. LPA also did random medication checks and obtained documents for residents’ medication distribution. During today’s visit LPA Gutierrez delivered findings. SEE LIC 9099C Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 22, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251104120932
Nov 22, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Nov 6, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner

The purpose of this report is to conduct additional staff interviews regarding the above allegation from the initial complaint dated 10/15/2025. LPA met with Administrator Stephanie Funderburg and discussed the purpose of the visit. At today's visit 11/06/2025 Staff S1- S4 were interviewed. The initial visit was conducted on 10/20/2025 and included the following: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced initial visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Stephanie Funderburg and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA reviewing and obtaining copies of staff and resident rosters, R1's file was reviewed and Admission Agreement. Physician's Report and Emergency ID Face sheet were submitted. Interviews were conducted with (2) staff (S1-S2), eleven (11) residents (R#1-R#11) Administrator was also interviewed. The investigation revealed regarding Allegation Staff handled resident in a rough manner, based on interviews conducthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 6, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251015113838
Nov 4, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent a physical altercation between residents in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Konishi conducted an initial 10-day complaint visit at the facility and met with the Executive Director, Stephanie Funderburg to discuss the purpose for today's visit. The purpose of the visit is to investigate the above allegation. Investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested a copy of staff and resident rosters. LPA also requested copies from Resident#1 (R1’s) file such as: Face Sheet, Physician’s Report, House Rules, Resident Handbook, SOC341, and Incident Reports. LPA also obtained Staff training documents. LPA also requested copies of Resident #2 (R2’s) file such as: Face Sheet and Physician’s Report. LPA interviewed R1 to Resident #6 (R6), the Executive Director, and Staff #1 (S1) to Staff #6 (S6). The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation, “Staff did not prevent a physical altercation between residents in care.” It is alleged on 10/25/2025 at 4:29pm, Resident #1 (R1) yelled at Resident #2 (R2) and R1the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 4, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251027173421
Oct 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff mismanaged resident's medication.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted a subsequent visit to investigate the reported allgeation, met with Administrator Stephanie Funderberg and explained the purpose for todays visit. On 6/30/25 LPA Wesely conducted the inital 10 day visit and obtained copies of staff/resident rosters, reviewed medication log, interviewed 3 staff and retrieved specific items regarding the complaint investigation allegation. During todays visit LPA Herrera obtained copies of staff/resident rosters, copies of Resident #1's (R1) MAR (Medication Administration Record) from March-May 2025, LPA reviewed 15 residents medications and conducted interviews with 3 Staff (S1-S3) and 11 Residents. (Continued on LIC9099-C page) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250625144015
Oct 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced initial visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Stephanie Funderburg , and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA reviewing and obtaining copies of staff and resident rosters, R1's file was reviewed and Admission Agreement. Physician's Report and Emergency ID Face sheet were submitted. Interviews were conducted with (2) staff (S1-S2), ten (11) residents (R#1-R#11) Administrator was also interviewed. The investigation revealed regarding Allegation Staff handled resident in a rough manner, based on interviews conducted and information gathered Resident's R3- R11 all stated that they never observed staff doing anything verbally or physically abusive. R3 and R11 stated they live over the courtyard and have not seen staff mishandling residents in a rough manner. R3- R11 also stated that staff treat them well and will help them if they ask for assistance. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251015113838
Oct 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not following proper eviction procedures.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made an unannounced initial visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Michelle Castillo, Business Office Manager, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Administrator Stephanie Funderburg arrived a short time later and assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA reviewing and obtaining copies of staff and resident rosters, R1 admission agreement. R1 Physicians report dated 02/27/2025, R1overdue rent notices provided to resident, Interviewing four (4) staff (S#1-S#4), ten (10) residents (R#1-R#10) The investigation revealed regarding Allegation: Staff are not following proper eviction procedures. It is alleged that facility administrator verbally gave resident a 3 day notice to quit. (Continued on 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250930161850
Oct 6, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 23, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not properly supervising resident who may be a fall risk Staff were not meeting residents personal hygiene needs Staff do not provide adequate food service to residents Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident

****This report supersedes the complaint investigation report dated 09/23/2025. The purpose of the visit is to add additional information not included in the report; the findings remain the same. ***** Today 11/13/25, Met with Ruth Villa and conducted tour of the facility and did not observe any healthyand safety concerns. On 09/23/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sanjay Vaid conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Wellness Director Ruth Villa and explained the reason for the visit, Administrator Stephanie Funderburg arrived shortly after and assisted with the tour. LPA Vaid did not observe any health and safety concerns. On 04/17/2025, LPA Vaid met with Mena Marrisa-Wellness Director. LPA requested and obtained resident and staff rosters. LPA requested copies of residents’ files for 5 random residents -face sheet, physicians reports. #1(R1) identification and emergency sheet, physician’s report, last incident rethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 23, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250411114444
Sep 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 2, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not provide medications as prescribed Facility staff failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living Facility staff retaliated against a resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Michelle Castillo and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator arrived shortly after. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested a copy of staff/resident roster. LPA conducted a medication check for 8 residents, interviewed 8 residents and 6 staff, and requested copies of medication sheets for 8 residents, physician’s report, needs and care plan, and notes for resident #3 and #8(R3 and R8). The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility staff did not provide medications as prescribed. It is alleged staff have not provided resident with routine medication for several occasions. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 2, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250826094641
Aug 8, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 20, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 13, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 29, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 3, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 16, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jan 7, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20249 state visits · 13 documents
Dec 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 12, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 25, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 6, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 6, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 4, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff handled resident in a rough manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Stephanie Funderburg and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 8/22/24 LPA Flores conducted a case management visit at the facility regarding the above allegation. During that visit LPA requested copies of the following documents; incident report dated: 8/6/24, report of suspected dependent elder abuse (SOC 341) dated: 8/2/24, Pasadena police department business card with report number, identification and emergency information sheet, physician’s report, pre-placement assessment, needs and care plan for residents’#1-2(R1-R2), notice of employee separation, suspension notice, notice to employee as to change in relationship, personnel record for staff #1(S1), email, and other supporting documents. LPA interviewed 5 staff and 2 residents. On 9/4/24 LPA Flores interview S1 over the phone and delivered fthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 4, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240827213252
Aug 27, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Aug 22, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20236 state visits · 7 documents
Dec 21, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff unlawfully evicted resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted an initial complaint visit in response to the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Stephanie Funderburg, who assisted with today's visit. Regarding the allegation that : Staff unlawfully evicted resident #1. The investigation consisted of review of resident #1's file, and interview(s) with Administrator, and Staff #1. The investigation revealed that resident #1 moved into the facility on 11/21/23. Administrator stated that resident #1 left the faciilty on 12/4/23, was picked up by the police and taken to the hospital. Administrator stated that the facility wellness director went to the hospital to reassess resident #1. Administrator stated that it was determined that resident #1 required a higher level of care, that they were not initially aware of when resident #1 was admitted. Administrator stated that they did not provide resident #1 with an eviction notice, but they did not feel that resident #1 should return tothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 21, 2023 · control 28-AS-20231214170530
Dec 8, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Dec 5, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent a resident from being sexually abused while in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted a subsequent compliant investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Stephanie Funderburg and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 8/1/23 LPA Flores conducted a Health and Safety check visit at the facility and requested copies of the following documents staff/resident roster, admission agreement, physician's report, identification and emergency information sheet, needs and care plan, medication sheet for July 2023, incident reports, notes on resident #1 and #2 (R1-R2), staff schedules for the month of July 2023. On 8/22/23 and 8/25/23 IB investigator Sonia Sandoval from the department’s Investigation Bureau conducted interviews with R1, and 3 staff(S1-S3). On 10/18/23 LPA Flores contacted Pasadena’s Police Department. On 10/18/23 and 11/8/23 LPA Flores left a voice for Detective at Special Victim Unit. On 12/4/23 LPA Flores conducted interviews with 5 additional resthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 5, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230801093641
Oct 19, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not provide adequate care and supervision to the residents while in care Staff are blocking the doorway to prevent the residents from coming out

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted a subsequent visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Tasha Thompson Front Desk Concierge and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator arrived 10 minutes later. The investigation consisted of the following: On 4/3/23 LPA Flores conducted a tour of the dementia unit, interviewed staff #1-9(S1 - S9), and residents #1-7(R1-R7), and requested copies of staff/resident roster, and of physician's report, face sheet, and needs and care plan for R1-R6. On 10/19/23 LPA Flores requested physician’s report, needs and care plan, for resident #8(R8) and delivered findings. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff did not provide adequate care and supervision to the residents while in care. (CONTINUED ON LIC (9099C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 19, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230328095738
Oct 19, 2023Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 5, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations12typical 1
Type B citations12typical 1
Substantiated complaints28typical 2
Total complaints48typical 7
State visits on file84typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026121702025283042024913120237822022330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
If end-of-life care were ever needed, could they stay here? What’s the plan?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (626) 796-4303

Is Astoria Park Senior Living licensed?

Yes — Astoria Park Senior Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Pasadena (Los Angeles County): California license #198603566, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 220 residents. State records list 70 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated June 23, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Astoria Park Senior Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Astoria Park Senior Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care and hospice care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 104 AMBULATORY AND 116 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 104 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE CARE WIAVER FOR 25 RESIDENTS.

How much does Astoria Park Senior Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Astoria Park Senior Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Astoria Park Senior Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Astoria Park Senior Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Los Angeles County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

147 of 220 beds occupied (67%) when the state visited on December 6, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Astoria Park Senior Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 84 state visits and 70 dated documents since 2022 for Astoria Park Senior Living; 15 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated December 6, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

15 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not respond to resident's call button in a timely manner. Staff left resident on the floor for an extended period of time.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made subsequent unannounced visit to deliver finding for the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Stasha Provitt, Community Liason Director and discussed the purpose of the visit. LPA interviewed seven (7) staff total (S#1 – S#7) and Eleven (11) residents (R#1 -R#11) On 11/24/2025 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Karine Tomassian, Admissions Coordinator, and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA taking a tour of facility common area and random rooms, reviewing and obtaining staff and resident roosters, schedule for November 7, 2025, call light log for November 7, 2025, interviews with five (5) staff and Eleven (11) residents. Due to lack of information, requires needs further investigation, LPA will return another day. (Continued on 9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 6, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251119194926
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff neglect resulted in a resident sustaining multiple pressure injuries. Lack of supervision let to multiple falls resulting in injuries Staff did not address a resident's change in medical condition. Staff did not seek timely medical attention for a resident. Staff did not ensure a resident consumed an appropriate amount of liquid while in care.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made a subsequent visit to facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with Michelle Castillo, Business Office Manager, and discussed the purpose of the visit. 11/25/2024 - Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Stephanie Funderburg, Administrator, and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested a copy of staff/resident roster. LPA conducted a health and safety check tour of the facility and observed commercial kitchen, common areas, and 13 residents’ randomly chosen rooms. There are sufficient food supplies for at least 2 days of perishables, and 7 days of non-perishables. (Continued on 9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 2, 2025 · control 28-AS-20241122160546
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not administering residents' medications as prescribed
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Christian Gutierrez conducted a subsequent complain visit in regard to the allegations listed above. LPA met with Community Director Stasha Provitt who assisted with today’s visit. The investigation consisted of the following: During the initial visit conducted on 11/06/2025, LPA interviewed Executive Director, Staff 1-staff 3 (s1-S3) and residents 2- residents 10 (R2-R10). LPA obtained copies of the following documents: Staff roster, resident roster, R1’s physicians reports, identification information (LIC 601), orders for medication, hospital discharge paperwork with updated medication, and Medication distribution log. LPA also did random medication checks and obtained documents for residents’ medication distribution. During today’s visit LPA Gutierrez delivered findings. SEE LIC 9099C SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 22, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251104120932
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handled resident in a rough manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
The purpose of this report is to conduct additional staff interviews regarding the above allegation from the initial complaint dated 10/15/2025. LPA met with Administrator Stephanie Funderburg and discussed the purpose of the visit. At today's visit 11/06/2025 Staff S1- S4 were interviewed. The initial visit was conducted on 10/20/2025 and included the following: Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced initial visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Stephanie Funderburg and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA reviewing and obtaining copies of staff and resident rosters, R1's file was reviewed and Admission Agreement. Physician's Report and Emergency ID Face sheet were submitted. Interviews were conducted with (2) staff (S1-S2), eleven (11) residents (R#1-R#11) Administrator was also interviewed. The investigation revealed regarding Allegation Staff handled resident in a rough manner, based on interviews conducCDSS inspection report, November 6, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251015113838
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent a physical altercation between residents in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Daniel Konishi conducted an initial 10-day complaint visit at the facility and met with the Executive Director, Stephanie Funderburg to discuss the purpose for today's visit. The purpose of the visit is to investigate the above allegation. Investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested a copy of staff and resident rosters. LPA also requested copies from Resident#1 (R1’s) file such as: Face Sheet, Physician’s Report, House Rules, Resident Handbook, SOC341, and Incident Reports. LPA also obtained Staff training documents. LPA also requested copies of Resident #2 (R2’s) file such as: Face Sheet and Physician’s Report. LPA interviewed R1 to Resident #6 (R6), the Executive Director, and Staff #1 (S1) to Staff #6 (S6). The investigation revealed the following: In regards to the allegation, “Staff did not prevent a physical altercation between residents in care.” It is alleged on 10/25/2025 at 4:29pm, Resident #1 (R1) yelled at Resident #2 (R2) and R1CDSS inspection report, November 4, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251027173421
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff mismanaged resident's medication.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tena Herrera conducted a subsequent visit to investigate the reported allgeation, met with Administrator Stephanie Funderberg and explained the purpose for todays visit. On 6/30/25 LPA Wesely conducted the inital 10 day visit and obtained copies of staff/resident rosters, reviewed medication log, interviewed 3 staff and retrieved specific items regarding the complaint investigation allegation. During todays visit LPA Herrera obtained copies of staff/resident rosters, copies of Resident #1's (R1) MAR (Medication Administration Record) from March-May 2025, LPA reviewed 15 residents medications and conducted interviews with 3 Staff (S1-S3) and 11 Residents. (Continued on LIC9099-C page) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 20, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250625144015
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handled resident in a rough manner
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Glenn Trueman made an unannounced initial visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Stephanie Funderburg , and discussed the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA reviewing and obtaining copies of staff and resident rosters, R1's file was reviewed and Admission Agreement. Physician's Report and Emergency ID Face sheet were submitted. Interviews were conducted with (2) staff (S1-S2), ten (11) residents (R#1-R#11) Administrator was also interviewed. The investigation revealed regarding Allegation Staff handled resident in a rough manner, based on interviews conducted and information gathered Resident's R3- R11 all stated that they never observed staff doing anything verbally or physically abusive. R3 and R11 stated they live over the courtyard and have not seen staff mishandling residents in a rough manner. R3- R11 also stated that staff treat them well and will help them if they ask for assistance. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 20, 2025 · control 28-AS-20251015113838
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not following proper eviction procedures.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made an unannounced initial visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Michelle Castillo, Business Office Manager, and discussed the purpose of the visit. Administrator Stephanie Funderburg arrived a short time later and assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of LPA reviewing and obtaining copies of staff and resident rosters, R1 admission agreement. R1 Physicians report dated 02/27/2025, R1overdue rent notices provided to resident, Interviewing four (4) staff (S#1-S#4), ten (10) residents (R#1-R#10) The investigation revealed regarding Allegation: Staff are not following proper eviction procedures. It is alleged that facility administrator verbally gave resident a 3 day notice to quit. (Continued on 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 7, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250930161850
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not properly supervising resident who may be a fall risk Staff were not meeting residents personal hygiene needs Staff do not provide adequate food service to residents Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
****This report supersedes the complaint investigation report dated 09/23/2025. The purpose of the visit is to add additional information not included in the report; the findings remain the same. ***** Today 11/13/25, Met with Ruth Villa and conducted tour of the facility and did not observe any healthyand safety concerns. On 09/23/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sanjay Vaid conducted a subsequent unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Wellness Director Ruth Villa and explained the reason for the visit, Administrator Stephanie Funderburg arrived shortly after and assisted with the tour. LPA Vaid did not observe any health and safety concerns. On 04/17/2025, LPA Vaid met with Mena Marrisa-Wellness Director. LPA requested and obtained resident and staff rosters. LPA requested copies of residents’ files for 5 random residents -face sheet, physicians reports. #1(R1) identification and emergency sheet, physician’s report, last incident reCDSS inspection report, September 23, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250411114444
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not provide medications as prescribed Facility staff failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living Facility staff retaliated against a resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Michelle Castillo and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator arrived shortly after. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested a copy of staff/resident roster. LPA conducted a medication check for 8 residents, interviewed 8 residents and 6 staff, and requested copies of medication sheets for 8 residents, physician’s report, needs and care plan, and notes for resident #3 and #8(R3 and R8). The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility staff did not provide medications as prescribed. It is alleged staff have not provided resident with routine medication for several occasions. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 2, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250826094641

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff handled resident in a rough manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Stephanie Funderburg and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 8/22/24 LPA Flores conducted a case management visit at the facility regarding the above allegation. During that visit LPA requested copies of the following documents; incident report dated: 8/6/24, report of suspected dependent elder abuse (SOC 341) dated: 8/2/24, Pasadena police department business card with report number, identification and emergency information sheet, physician’s report, pre-placement assessment, needs and care plan for residents’#1-2(R1-R2), notice of employee separation, suspension notice, notice to employee as to change in relationship, personnel record for staff #1(S1), email, and other supporting documents. LPA interviewed 5 staff and 2 residents. On 9/4/24 LPA Flores interview S1 over the phone and delivered fCDSS inspection report, September 4, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240827213252

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff unlawfully evicted resident
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted an initial complaint visit in response to the allegation listed above. LPA met with Administrator, Stephanie Funderburg, who assisted with today's visit. Regarding the allegation that : Staff unlawfully evicted resident #1. The investigation consisted of review of resident #1's file, and interview(s) with Administrator, and Staff #1. The investigation revealed that resident #1 moved into the facility on 11/21/23. Administrator stated that resident #1 left the faciilty on 12/4/23, was picked up by the police and taken to the hospital. Administrator stated that the facility wellness director went to the hospital to reassess resident #1. Administrator stated that it was determined that resident #1 required a higher level of care, that they were not initially aware of when resident #1 was admitted. Administrator stated that they did not provide resident #1 with an eviction notice, but they did not feel that resident #1 should return toCDSS inspection report, December 21, 2023 · control 28-AS-20231214170530
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent a resident from being sexually abused while in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted a subsequent compliant investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Stephanie Funderburg and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 8/1/23 LPA Flores conducted a Health and Safety check visit at the facility and requested copies of the following documents staff/resident roster, admission agreement, physician's report, identification and emergency information sheet, needs and care plan, medication sheet for July 2023, incident reports, notes on resident #1 and #2 (R1-R2), staff schedules for the month of July 2023. On 8/22/23 and 8/25/23 IB investigator Sonia Sandoval from the department’s Investigation Bureau conducted interviews with R1, and 3 staff(S1-S3). On 10/18/23 LPA Flores contacted Pasadena’s Police Department. On 10/18/23 and 11/8/23 LPA Flores left a voice for Detective at Special Victim Unit. On 12/4/23 LPA Flores conducted interviews with 5 additional resCDSS inspection report, December 5, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230801093641
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not provide adequate care and supervision to the residents while in care Staff are blocking the doorway to prevent the residents from coming out
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted a subsequent visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Tasha Thompson Front Desk Concierge and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator arrived 10 minutes later. The investigation consisted of the following: On 4/3/23 LPA Flores conducted a tour of the dementia unit, interviewed staff #1-9(S1 - S9), and residents #1-7(R1-R7), and requested copies of staff/resident roster, and of physician's report, face sheet, and needs and care plan for R1-R6. On 10/19/23 LPA Flores requested physician’s report, needs and care plan, for resident #8(R8) and delivered findings. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff did not provide adequate care and supervision to the residents while in care. (CONTINUED ON LIC (9099C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 19, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230328095738
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was hit with an object by an unknown perpetrator resulting in fracture.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst(s)(LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA met with Dana Barcelona - Community Partner and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 12/23/22 LPA Kruz conducted a health and safety check visit, no immediate concerns were observed. LPA Kruz requested the following documents; staff/resident roster, identification and emergency information, physician's report, preplacement appraisal information, care assessment, power of attorney, service plan for resident #1(R1). Investigation Bureau (IB) of the Department conducted the investigation, interviews, and requested additional documents. On 3/16/23 IB investigator Brian Slatic conducted interviews with staff and R1 at the facility. On 5/13/23 LPA Flores delivered findings at the facility. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, May 13, 2023 · control 28-AS-20221223091903

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 84 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
12
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
12
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
28
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
48
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
84
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(626) 796-4303
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Astoria Park Senior Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.