Regency Park Oak Knoll is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Pasadena, Los Angeles County, California — state license #191200037, licensed for 206 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 15 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated April 6, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Regency Park Oak Knoll

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 206 residents · Pasadena, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospice not on fileBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #191200037, held since 1987 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
255 South Oak Knoll · Pasadena, Los Angeles County
Phone
(626) 578-1551
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
regencypk.com
listed in the county’s published care-facility roster
Listing details can lag reality — confirm anything important by phone.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryVerified in record
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careNot on file — ask the home
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
SERVES ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND OVER. AMBULATORY & NON-AMBULATORY CLEARED FOR 206 NON-AMB IN RMS 101-140(EXCLUDING110) & RMS 201-267 (EXCLUDING 221,222 & 243). APPROVED FOR A MAXIMUM OF 10 HOSPICE CARE RESIDENTS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 17 times and filed 15 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated April 6, 2026.

Most recent state visit
April 6, 2026
Occupancy at the April 15, 2025 visit
90 of 206 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 6 documents with transcribed findings, dated April 17, 2023 to April 15, 2025. 6 of the 6 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unfounded” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 6 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 6 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 9 of 15 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Apr 6, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 5 documents
Jul 15, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are not mitigating the spread of infectious outbreaks in the facility. Staff are not keeping the facility clean and orderly. Staff are not meeting residents' personal hygiene needs.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Galarza conducted an initial 10-day complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Business Services Director. Executive Director arrived shortly after and assisted with the physical plant inspection. The investigation consisted of: A physical plant tour was conducted, with special focus on all common areas and inspection of 18 resident rooms. Records pertaining to resident (R1) were reviewed and collected. Staff (S1-S7), family (F1), and residents (R1-R6) were interviewed. *Narrative continues next page. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 15, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250409144507
Apr 15, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff failed to protect a resident from being sexually abused.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 3/25/25 LPA Flores conducted a health and safety check at the facility and requested physician’s report, needs and care plan, pre-appraisal, and facility notes for Resident #1(R1). On 3/28/25 LPA received documents requested for R1. On 4/9/25 LPA conducted interviews over the phone with staff and requested the following documents for Resident #2(R2) physician’s report, needs and care plan, pre-appraisal. On 4/10/25 LPA conducted interviews with residents and delivered findings. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff failed to protect a resident from being sexually abused. It is alleged there was a resident who was harassing another resident and responsible party suspects resident was sexual abuse by that resident. (the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 10, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250324111638
Apr 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Jun 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not arrange medical care for a resident Staff did not ensure that facility was maintained sanitary Staff did not safeguard a resident's ambulatory devices

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Jacqueline Hernandez and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested a copy of resident and staff roster. LPA conducted a tour resident #1’s room. LPA conducted interviews with 4 residents and 6 staff. LPA requested the following copies for resident #1 (R1); admission’s agreement, physician’s report, personal property and valuables, identification and emergency information sheet, incident report, notice to physician, preplacement appraisal information, and work orders. Copies of in-service training provided on 6/13/24 were obtained. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff did not arrange medial care for a resident. It is alleged R1 fell and sustained injuries however, staff did not call 911 for the resident. Per incident report, on 6/3/24 R1 was found in R1’s roothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 17, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240612113615
May 16, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 1
Type B citations3typical 1
Substantiated complaints4typical 2
Total complaints5typical 7
State visits on file17typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 1987.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025350202433120233412022330
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (626) 578-1551

Is Regency Park Oak Knoll licensed?

Yes — Regency Park Oak Knoll is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Pasadena (Los Angeles County): California license #191200037, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 206 residents. State records list 15 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated April 6, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Regency Park Oak Knoll care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Regency Park Oak Knoll with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory and dementia / memory care; it does not list hospice care and bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordSERVES ELDERLY RESIDENTS AGE 60 AND OVER. AMBULATORY & NON-AMBULATORY CLEARED FOR 206 NON-AMB IN RMS 101-140(EXCLUDING110) & RMS 201-267 (EXCLUDING 221,222 & 243). APPROVED FOR A MAXIMUM OF 10 HOSPICE CARE RESIDENTS.

How much does Regency Park Oak Knoll cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Regency Park Oak Knoll's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Regency Park Oak Knoll accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Regency Park Oak Knoll is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

90 of 206 beds occupied (44%) when the state visited on April 15, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Regency Park Oak Knoll?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 17 state visits and 15 dated documents since 2022 for Regency Park Oak Knoll; 6 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 15, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

6 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are not mitigating the spread of infectious outbreaks in the facility. Staff are not keeping the facility clean and orderly. Staff are not meeting residents' personal hygiene needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Galarza conducted an initial 10-day complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA discussed the purpose of the visit with Business Services Director. Executive Director arrived shortly after and assisted with the physical plant inspection. The investigation consisted of: A physical plant tour was conducted, with special focus on all common areas and inspection of 18 resident rooms. Records pertaining to resident (R1) were reviewed and collected. Staff (S1-S7), family (F1), and residents (R1-R6) were interviewed. *Narrative continues next page. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 15, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250409144507
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff failed to protect a resident from being sexually abused.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: On 3/25/25 LPA Flores conducted a health and safety check at the facility and requested physician’s report, needs and care plan, pre-appraisal, and facility notes for Resident #1(R1). On 3/28/25 LPA received documents requested for R1. On 4/9/25 LPA conducted interviews over the phone with staff and requested the following documents for Resident #2(R2) physician’s report, needs and care plan, pre-appraisal. On 4/10/25 LPA conducted interviews with residents and delivered findings. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff failed to protect a resident from being sexually abused. It is alleged there was a resident who was harassing another resident and responsible party suspects resident was sexual abuse by that resident. (CDSS inspection report, April 10, 2025 · control 28-AS-20250324111638

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not arrange medical care for a resident Staff did not ensure that facility was maintained sanitary Staff did not safeguard a resident's ambulatory devices
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA met with Jacqueline Hernandez and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA requested a copy of resident and staff roster. LPA conducted a tour resident #1’s room. LPA conducted interviews with 4 residents and 6 staff. LPA requested the following copies for resident #1 (R1); admission’s agreement, physician’s report, personal property and valuables, identification and emergency information sheet, incident report, notice to physician, preplacement appraisal information, and work orders. Copies of in-service training provided on 6/13/24 were obtained. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Staff did not arrange medial care for a resident. It is alleged R1 fell and sustained injuries however, staff did not call 911 for the resident. Per incident report, on 6/3/24 R1 was found in R1’s rooCDSS inspection report, June 17, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240612113615

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not follow reporting requirements in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation. LPA met with Jacqueline Hernandez Business Manager and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator arrived 45 minutes later. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Flores requested a copy of staff/resident rosters. LPA interviewed administrator and requested copies of staff physician's notes for staff #1, #2, and resident #1. The investigation revealed the following: Regarding allegation: Facility staff did not follow reporting requirements in a timely manner. It is alleged facility failed to report scabies breakout to proper agencies. Documents review revealed, on 5/11/23 staff #1(S1) provided a physician's note with a diagnosis of scabies and was placed on leave. On 5/22/23 staff #2 provided a physician's note that rule out scabies. On 5/25/23 facility's administrator contacted Pasadena Department of Public Health (PDPH) via phone callCDSS inspection report, June 2, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230526091805
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff denied resident visitors. Resident left in soiled clothing for extended period of time. Staff yelled at resident.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
* This report supersedes report created on 4/17/23 and provides corrected information on LIC 9099C.* Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA Flores met with Anabelle Argenal and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Flores requested a copy of resident, staff roster and death reports within the last month. LPA conducted interview with Administrator and with staff,#2(S2),#3(S3),#4(S4),#5(S5),#6(S6). LPA reviewed last 6 months of billing statements. During the review of resident roster, death reports, and interview with administrator it was found that resident in question did not reside at the facility. Interviews with 5 additional staff and reviewed of billing statements verified resident in question has not reside at the facility. (CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C) UnfoundedCDSS inspection report, May 19, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230410112236
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unfounded
Allegation the state reviewedStaff denied resident visitors. Resident left in soiled clothing for extended period of time. Staff yelled at resident.
State's findingUnfoundedThe state investigated and found the allegation to be false.
Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Mary Flores conducted an unannounced complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegation(s). LPA Flores met with Anabelle Argenal and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Flores requested a copy of resident, staff roster and death reports within the last month. LPA conducted interview with Administrator and with staff,#2(S2),#3(S3),#4(S4),#5(S5),#6(S6). LPA reviewed last 6 months of billing statements. During the review of resident roster, death reports, and interview with administrator it was found that resident in question did not reside at the facility. Interviews with 5 additional staff and reviewed of billing statements verified resident in question has not reside at the facility. Based on the information gathered during this visit, the allegation(s) are deemed UNFOUNDED. A finding of UNFOUNDED means that the allegations are either false, could not have happened, and/or are without a reasoCDSS inspection report, April 17, 2023 · control 28-AS-20230410112236

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 17 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
5
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
17
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(626) 578-1551
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Regency Park Oak Knoll? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.