Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
All in CarehomeLicense #198603538 · Covelight Care
Covelight CareAll in CarehomeLicense #198603538 · 1158 Beaver Way, La Verne, CA · (626) 698-9615Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Los Angeles County/La Verne/All in Carehome
Map · 1158 Beaver Way

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$4,900/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,050 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (626) 698-9615

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

AC

Call All in Carehome

La Verne · Licensed for 6

(626) 698-9615

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · La Verne

All in Carehome

1158 Beaver Way, La Verne, CA 91750 · Licensed since 2022

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

All in Carehome

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$4,900 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,050 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Dementia
  • Hospiceup to 3 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 1 resident

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ONE MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDROOM/RESIDENT ROOM #4- OKAY FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 3 RESIDENTS

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 3 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for All in Carehome: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight and help with medicines. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,900a month to start

Likely $4,050–$6,050

From 12 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,900likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,900likely $4,050–$6,050

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,050–$6,200
$4,900
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,750–$9,400
$7,400
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes12 nearby homes publish starting rates of $1,900 to $7,000

$1,900$7,000

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

12 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,100–$4,800.

  • Genesis Manor IVLa Verne · 0.5 mi · Small home
    $4,750Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 27, 2026
  • San Dimas Adventist Home CareSan Dimas · 1.4 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Gold Medal EstatesClaremont · 2.0 mi · Small home
    $4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Bentits Retirement VillaSan Dimas · 2.1 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Alta Loma Gardens Residential Care #2Claremont · 2.5 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Glen Park at GlendoraGlendora · 3.1 mi · Mid-size home
    $6,102Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Gold Medal Senior Living GardensClaremont · 3.4 mi · Small home
    $4,800Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Western Assemblies HomeClaremont · 3.7 mi · Mid-size home
    $1,900Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Family HomeSan Dimas · 4.3 mi · Small home
    $7,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Genesis Manor VClaremont · 4.3 mi · Small home
    $4,750Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 27, 2026
  • Genesis Manor IIClaremont · 4.4 mi · Small home
    $4,750Listed on its own website · shared room · seen October 27, 2026
  • Mountain View CenterClaremont · 4.5 mi · Mid-size home
    $2,550Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

1158 Beaver Way, La Verne, CA 91750Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1Casa Colina HospitalHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list2.7 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #198603538 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 8 of 14 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 1 “Unsubstantiated”.

20261 state visit · 1 document

Aug 13, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sanjay Vaid conducted an unannounced required annual inspection visit and was greeted by care giver Jerome Unica. LPA Vaid explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is located on a residential street and is a single-story dwelling. Administrator was notified and arrived shortly after to assist with the visit. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement tools for the visit today and observed the following: Operational Requirements: The fire clearance is approved for six (6) non-ambulatory of which one (1) may be bedridden. This facility may retain no more than three (3) hospice residents. There were zero (0) residents under hospice care during inspection. Residents Rights-Information: LPA Vaid observed the following postings in common areas throughout the facility: Complaint Poster (PUB 475), personal rights, and nondiscrimination notice. LPA Vaid observed facility land line. Physical Plant and Environment safety: Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons and other items that could pose a danger if readily available to residents, were observed to be inaccessible to residents. LPA Vaid observed carbon monoxide detectors and smoke alarms in hallways and are operational. LPA Vaid inspected four (4) resident rooms, two shared and two single occupancy. All resident bedrooms contained required furniture, linens and lighting. Water temperatures in all grooming and bathing areas were measured to be with 105 – 120 degrees F. LPA Vaid observed grab bars near toilets and inside showers. LPA Vaid observed no-slip mat in showers. Food Service: LPA Vaid observed sufficient supply of nonperishables for one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days in the facility kitchen area. Soaps, detergents, and cleaning compounds were observed to be stored away from food supplies. Freezers and refrigerators were observed to be clean and within temperatures of 0-degree F, and refrigerators with maximum temperature of 40-degree F. CONTINUED ON 809C.................... Planned Activities: LPA Vaid observed staff assisting residents with seated exercises, coloring and crossword puzzles, and media. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has the Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610D/9 pages) in place. Last documented emergency drills were conducted on quarterly, last drill was conducted 05/2026. LPA Vaid observed facility sketches with exits and emergency exits routes throughout various locations of the facility. LPA Vaid observed emergency food supply located in kitchen cabinets. Insurance liability expires 10/29/2026. Health Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: The medications are centrally stored in the medication rooms and in bubble packs and/or original containers. The facility uses the Medication Administration Record (MAR) log to document medications given. The facility provides incidental medical services. Infection Control: There are using appropriate hand hygiene and wearing gloves while assisting clients. Staff are cleaning and disinfecting often for high touched surfaces. Facility has an Infection Control Plan in place. Staffing: Administrator Certificate for Shelly Yamashiro expires 10/05/2027. Staff employed are over the age of 18 and are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. Personnel Records Training: Staff files are maintained at the facility. LPA Vaid observed required annual training, CPR and First Aid for five (5) personnel records reviewed. LPA Vaid observed TB testing results, Health screening, fingerprint clearance and job application for five (5) personnel records reviewed. Resident Records/Incident Reports: LPA reviewed resident files for six (6) residents in care. Resident files are maintained at the facility. Admission Agreement, Physician's Report (including T.B and Ambulatory Status), Consent for Medical Treatment, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Resident Pre-Appraisal, Care Plan/Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, Resident Rights were observed. Residents with Special Needs: No large bodies of water were observed LPA Vaid observed signs posted indicating “No smoking - Oxygen in Use” in various locations of the facility. LPA Vaid observed several oxygen tanks in resident rooms secured in stands. Knives, sharps or other items that could pose a danger to residents with dementia, were observed to be inaccessible. Auditory devices were observed to be in working order. No deficiencies were observed during visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2026

20252 state visits · 2 documents

Sep 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sakinah Madyun conducted an unannounced continued Annual Inspection visit on 09/19/25 at approximately 9:10am. LPA was met by Caregiver Jerome Unica and explained the reason for the return visit. Administrator Shelly Yamashiro and Caregiver/Designated Administrator Rathany Suy arrived shortly after. The facility is licensed to serve clients of age 18 to 59 years old and has a fire clearance approved for six (6) non-ambulatory of which one (1) may be bedridden and approved hospice waiver for three (3) clients. There were one (1) resident under hospice care. During today's continued annual visit, LPA Madyun observed the following: Bathrooms: LPA retested bathrooms after water adjustment and temperature measured at 112.2-112.9 degrees Fahrenheit within the range of 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. Kitchen: LPA retested kitchen after water adjustment and temperature measured at 111.2 degrees Fahrenheit within the range of 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. Staffing/Personnel Files: LPA completed staff interviews and files. Client Records/Centrally Stored Medications: LPA observed six (6) of six (6) client files and reviewed the additional four (4) of six (6) clients medications and logs. Inspection tool completed. No deficiencies are being cited today. Exit interview conducted with Shelly Yamashiro and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 19, 2025
Sep 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sakinah Madyun conducted an unannounced Required Annual Visit on 09/12/25 using the CARE Inspection tool. LPA was met by Staff #2 Jerome Unica and Staff #3 Gener Gutierrez and explained the purpose of the visit. S2 assisted in the tour of the facility and Administrator Rathay Suy arrived later during the facility tour. The facility is licensed to serve clients of age 18 to 59 years old clients and has a fire clearance approved for six (6) non-ambulatory of which one (1) may be bedridden and approved hospice waiver for three (3) clients. There were one (1) resident under hospice care.. A tour of the single-story facility began at approximately 9:10am that included residents’ rooms: one (1) private staff bedroom, four (4) bedrooms, two (2) bathrooms, living room, dining area, kitchen, backyard, garage/laundry room/storage space. All residents’ bedrooms have the required furniture for privacy, comfort, and safety. Additional bedding supplies and grooming supplies were observed in the hallway cabinets securely locked. Bedrooms #4 had an exit door. Bathrooms were observed clean and in good repair. Each is in working condition, showers were observed with grab bars and skid mats aside the wall. Water temperature was tested in each bathroom sinks measuring 125.0 degrees F - 125.2 degrees F., which is not within the required 105-120 degrees F. LPA observed the Infection Control Plan revised 06/26/25 and Emergency Disaster Plan revised 06/26/25. Last documented emergency drill conducted on 06/26/25. First Aid kit observed and (2) Fire Extinguishers were observed and last checked on 06/13/25. Carbon monoxide detector, smoke detectors, and auditory signal systems were in working order located throughout facility. LPA Madyun observed facility sketches with exits and emergency exits routes throughout various locations of the facility. LPA Madyun observed the emergency food supply in kitchen cabinet. LIC 809C for continuation of report. LPA observed the front and backyard to be clean and well maintained without any hazards. Due to windy weather conditions the provided shade covering was destroyed. The kitchen is in good repair, dishes and utensils were observed, the cabinets are used to store items for cooking. Refrigerators were observed clean and in good repair. Food supplies were observed for at least 2 days of perishables and 7 days of non-perishables. Water temperature was tested in the kitchen sink measuring 125.0 degrees F - 125.2 degrees F., which is not within the required 105-120 degrees F. The Laundry area was observed in the garage with locking cabinets for items that are inaccessible to clients. Licensing posters, Let us Know (PUB 745) and clients' personal rights were observed on a board in the kitchen/dining area. No large bodies of water were observed LPA Madyun observed signs posted indicating “No smoking - Oxygen in Use” in various locations of the facility. LPA Madyun observed several oxygen tanks in resident rooms secured in stands. Knives, sharps or other items that could pose a danger to residents with dementia, were observed to be inaccessible. The medications are centrally stored in the medication cabinet securely locked and in bubble packs and/or original containers. The facility uses the Medication Administration Record (MAR) log to document medications given. Resident files are maintained at the facility. LPA reviewed two (2) of six (6) clients medication logs. Due to time constraint LPA will return a later date and time for a continuation visit and conduct client interviews and review files and medication logs. Administrator Certificate for Shelly Yamashiro #7014120740 expires 10/05/27. Staff employed are over the age of 18 and are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. Staff are cleaning and disinfecting often for high touched surfaces. Facility has an Infection Control Plan in place. Staff files are maintained at the facility. LPA Madyun observed required annual training, CPR and First Aid for seven (7) out of the seven (7) personnel records reviewed. LPA Madyun observed TB testing results, Health screening, fingerprint clearance and job application for seven (7) out of the seven (7) personnel records reviewed. Due to time constraint LPA will return a later date and time for a continuation visit and conduct staff interviews. The following deficiency were cited according to The State of California Regulatory Codes, Title 22, Div. 6, Chapter 1(refer to Lic 809D). Exit interview conducted with Shelly Yamashiro and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 12, 2025

20243 state visits · 4 documents

Sep 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced required annual inspection visit and was greeted by care giver Carlo Encarnacion. LPA Ramirez explained the purpose of the visit. The facility is located on a residential street and is a single-story dwelling. LPA utilized the Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) tools for the visit today and observed the following: Physical Plant and Environment safety: Disinfectants, cleaning solutions, poisons and other items that could pose a danger if readily available to residents, were observed to be inaccessible to residents. LPA Ramirez observed carbon monoxide detectors and smoke alarms in hallways. LPA Ramirez inspected four (4) resident rooms. All resident bedrooms contained required furniture, linens and lighting. Water temperatures in all grooming and bathing areas were measured to be with 105 – 120 degrees F. LPA Ramirez observed grab bars near toilets and inside showers. LPA Ramirez observed no-slip mat in showers. Food Service: LPA Ramirez observed sufficient supply of nonperishables for one week and perishable foods for a minimum of two days in the facility kitchen area. Soaps, detergents, and cleaning compounds were observed to be stored away from food supplies. Freezers and refrigerators were observed to be clean and within temperatures of 0-degree F (-17.7 degree C), and refrigerators with maximum temperature of 40-degree F. (4 degree C). Planned Activities: LPA Ramirez observed board games, magazines, and other activities for residents. LPA Ramirez observed staff assisting residents with seated exercises, coloring and crossword puzzles. Residents Rights-Information: LPA Ramirez observed the following postings in common areas throughout the facility: Complaint Poster (PUB 475), personal rights, and nondiscrimination notice. LPA Ramirez observed facility land line. Disaster Preparedness: The facility has the Emergency Disaster Plan (LIC610D/9 pages) in place. Last documented emergency drills were conducted on 06/13/2024 and 03/29/2024. LPA Ramirez observed facility sketches with exits and emergency exits routes throughout various locations of the facility. LPA Ramirez observed emergency food supply located in kitchen cabinets. See 809-C Residents with Special Needs: No large bodies of water were observed LPA Ramirez observed signs posted indicating “No smoking - Oxygen in Use” in various locations of the facility. LPA Ramirez observed several oxygen tanks in resident rooms secured in stands. Knives, sharps or other items that could pose a danger to residents with dementia, were observed to be inaccessible. Auditory devices were observed to be in working order. Health Related Services/Incidental Medical Services: The medications are centrally stored in the medication rooms and in bubble packs and/or original containers. The facility uses the Medication Administration Record (MAR) log to document medications given. The facility provides incidental medical services. Staffing: Administrator Certificate for Shelly Yamashiro expires 10/2025. Staff employed are over the age of 18 and are fingerprint cleared and associated to the facility. Personnel Records Training: Staff files are maintained at the facility. LPA Ramirez observed required annual training, CPR and First Aid for three (3) out of the three (3) personnel records reviewed. LPA Ramirez observed TB testing results, Health screening, fingerprint clearance and job application for three (3) out of the three (3) personnel records reviewed. Infection Control: There are using appropriate hand hygiene and wearing gloves while assisting clients. Staff are cleaning and disinfecting often for high touched surfaces. Facility has an Infection Control Plan in place. Operational Requirements: The fire clearance is approved for six (6) non-ambulatory of which one (1) may be bedridden. This facility may retain no more than three (3) hospice residents. There were zero (0) residents under hospice care during inspection. Resident Records/Incident Reports: LPA reviewed resident files for six (6) residents in care. Resident files are maintained at the facility. Admission Agreement, Physician's Report (including T.B and Ambulatory Status), Consent for Medical Treatment, Preplacement Appraisal Information, Resident Pre-Appraisal, Care Plan/Appraisal/Needs and Services Plan, Resident Rights were observed. No deficiencies were observed during visit. Exit interview conducted. A copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 5, 2024
Mar 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left the residents unattended while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit on 3/X15/2024 to deliver findings. Initial complaint investigation was conducted on 03/07/2024 by LPA Ramirez and needs further investigation was documented. LPA Ramirez was met by Gloria Estrobo and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Ramirez requested and obtained copies of Resident Roster (LIC 9020), Staff Roster (LIC 500), Staff#1 - 3 interviews(S1 – S3), interview of Witness#1-2 (W1-W2) copy of Staff#2-3 (S2-S3) Personnel Record (LIC 501), Attempted interview of Resident#1-6 (R1-R6), Resident# 1-6 (R1- R6) review of resident records, copies of Resident#1-5 Physician’s Report, and physical plant tour. See 9099-C for continuation. Unsubstantiated The investigation revealed the following. Regarding Allegation: Staff left the residents unattended while in care- It is alleged staff left residents unattended on 2/21/24, around 5:30pm. Interview with W1 revealed on 2/21/24, around 5:30 pm, W1 made several attempts by ringing the facility doorbell and knocking on facility front door, to gain entry into the facility. W1 looked through the facility window and could see R1 sitting in their wheelchair and sitting at the kitchen table area. W1 revealed staff were not seen nearby after making several attempts to gain entry into the facility. W1 stated eventually an unknown young male (W2) answered the door and allowed W1 entry into the facility. W1 revealed they did not see any known staff in the facility for approximately 15 minutes after their arrival. Three (3) out of the three (3) staff interviewed deny this allegation. W2 denied this allegation. W2 stated staff#2 (S2) was in the facility garage area, tending to the laundry while W2 answered the door. W2 revealed all residents in care were in their rooms when W1 was allowed entry into the facility. It was revealed through records review and interviews that W2 is a minor child of S3. W2 revealed to LPA Ramirez that W2 was waiting for S3 to return to the facility but that S2 was in the facility garage when W1 arrived. Due to cognitive impairments, R1-R5 could not be interviewed. R6 no longer resides at the facility and was unable to be interviewed. LPA Ramirez did not observe video surveillance in common areas of the facility. According to Administrator Yamashiro, staff do not have timecards to clock in and out of their shifts. Although the allegation may have happened or are valid, there is not a preponderance of evidence to prove the alleged violations did or did not occur, therefore the allegations are UNSUBSTANTIATED. No deficiency is being cited today. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240227160538
Mar 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that a hazardous item was made inaccessible to resident. Staff did not maintain the facility in clean and sanitary condition.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation visit on 03/07/2024 regarding the above allegations. LPA Ramirez was met by Caregivers Rosalyne Obedoza and Edwin Uy and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Shelly Yamashiro arrived shortly after to assist with tour. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Ramirez requested and obtained copies of Resident Roster (LIC 9020), Staff Roster (LIC 500), Staff#1 - 3 interviews(S1 – S3), copy of Staff#2-3 (S2-S3) Personnel Record (LIC 501), Attempted interview of Resident#1-6 (R1-R6), Resident# 1-6 (R1- R6) review of resident records, copies of Resident#1-5 Physician’s Report, and physical plant tour. SEE 9099-C for continuation. Substantiated The investigation revealed the following. Regarding Allegation(s): Staff did not ensure that a hazardous item was made inaccessible to resident- It is alleged staff allow hazardous items to become accessible to residents in care. Three (3) out of the three (3) staff interviewed deny this allegation. At 8:52 am, LPA Ramirez toured shred bathroom #1. LPA Ramirez observed a can of Ajax powder bleach cleaner, sitting on top of bathroom cabinet. At 9:10 am. LPA Ramirez toured private bathroom#2 located in resident bedroom#3. LPA Ramirez observed a spray bottle of Clorox Bleach Germicidal Cleaner in bathroom shower. Four (4) out of five (5) residents in the home suffer from cognitive impairments. LPA Ramirez will issue deficiency based on observations. Based on observations, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. Staff did not maintain the facility in clean and sanitary condition- It is alleged the facility has mold in a bathroom and is dirty. Three (3) out of the three (3) staff interviewed deny this allegation. During tour of private bathroom#2 located in bedroom#3, LPA Ramirez observed blackish spots/and grime around the corner of the bathroom window, behind toilet and near toilet wall, and in between some of the tiles of the shower. LPA Ramirez will issue deficiency based on observations. Based on observations, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegation is found to be Substantiated. Deficiencies are being cited today. A copy of this report, 9099-D and appeals rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240227160538

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87705(f)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 8, 2024

87705 Care of Persons with Dementia (f) The following shall be stored inaccessible to residents with dementia: (2)Over-the-counter medication, nutritional supplements or vitamins, alcohol, cigarettes, and toxic substances such as certain plants, gardening supplies, cleaning supplies and disinfectants. This requirement was not met as evidence by:the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2024

Plan of correction: Staff removed cleaning products and placed in secure location. **This will clear 24hr POC** Licensee will retrain staff on above regulation by 3/21/24. Proof of re-training must be sent by 3/21/24. LPA Ramirez observed cleaning products to be accessible to residents in care during visit.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 8, 2024

87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not met as evidence by: LPA Ramirez observed blaskish spots and stains in bathroom#3 shower, near toilet wall and around window frame.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee will clean area and send picture proof to LPA by 03/21/2024.

The state marks this report as 5 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 4. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Mar 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

CASE MANAGEMENT FINDINGS: LPA Ramirez conducted case management deficiencies visit on 03/07/24, stemming from initial complaint investigation on 03/07/2024. LPA Ramirez and Administrator Shelly Yamashiro toured facility garage together. LPA Ramirez observed a cloth room divider near corner of garage, that was sectioning off an area of the garage. LPA Ramirez observed a bed with linen, several shoes, and various articles of clothing in bags and boxes. As of 3/7/2024, facility sketch does not indicate garage area is for live-in staff or a staff breakroom. According to Administrator Yamashiro, staff do not live in this area but they rest and may sleep in this area. During annual inspection on 09/21/2023, LPA Maldonado observed a makeshift room for live in staff in the garage. LPA Maldonado requested licensee obtain city permit for room built in garage or demolish room is not permitted by city. Plan of correction (POC) was due by 09/29/2023 and was not cleared. LPA Ramirez will issue deficiency based on observations and records review. Licensee will not use garage area for purposes of live in staff to dwell in garage unless licensee obtains a permit from city or licensee will demolish makeshift room area in garage. Deficiency being cited today: 87305(a) Alterations to Existing Building or New Facilities- (a)Prior to construction or alterations, all facilities shall obtain a building permit. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of this report and appeals rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2024

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87305(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 21, 2024

87305 Alterations to Existing Building or New Facilities (a) Prior to construction or alterations, all facilities shall obtain a building permit. This requirement was not met as evidence by: LPA Ramirez observed a cloth room divider near corner of garage, that was sectioning off an area of the garage. LPA Ramirez observed a bed with linen, several shoes, and various articles of clothing in bags and boxes.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2024

Plan of correction: Licensee will obtain proper city permits for the room built inside the garage, currently used for live-in staff, or demolish the room if not permitted by the city. Proof to be submitted to LPA via email by POC due date. Licensee will submit picture proof by due date of demolished room if unable to obtain permit.

20231 state visit · 1 document

Nov 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mora conducted an unannounced plan of correction (POC) visit to follow up on deficiencies noted on 10/26/23. LPA met with Edwin Uy (Caregiver) and explained the reason for the visit. On 10/26/23, LPA Mora conducted a complaint investigation visit and cited the following deficiencies: 87305(a) Alterations to Existing Building or New Facilities and 87303(a) Maintenance and Operation. On 10/26/23, LPA observed an unpermitted room in the facility's garage and was deemed a fire hazard by a City of La Verne Building Inspector and Code Compliance Officer. During today's visit, LPA observed that the unpermitted room has been demolished. Exit interview was conducted with Edwin Uy (Caregiver) and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 28, 2023
Earlier years2022 to 2023 · 6 documents

20232 state visits · 2 documents

Oct 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unpermitted construction on the premises. Facility did not provide a safe environment.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Luis Mora conducted an unannounced complaint visit to determine the validity of the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Edwin Uy (Caregiver) and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA interviewed the Administrator (on the phone), Staff 1 - Staff 2 (S1 - S2), City of La Verne Code Enforcement Officer, Owner of the property and Resident 1 - Resident 5 (R1 - R5). LPA also conducted a tour of the facility. The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation "unpermitted construction on the premises”, it is alleged that there was an unpermitted construction done in the garage. Administrator and staff stated that the room in the garage was there prior to the facility getting licensed. The owner of the property also stated the same. (Continued to LIC 9099-C) Substantiated On 12/15/2021, the Fire Department conducted a fire safety inspection as part of the facility's license application process and granted the fire clearance, and there was no mentioned of the room in the garage. The facility sketch submitted to the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) during the facility's license application does not show a room in the garage. The Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) conducted a pre-licensing visit on 03/21/2022 and a follow up visit on 05/11/2022, and the room in the garage was not mentioned in the report. On 10/03/2022, the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) conducted a case management visit and the report states that the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) observed a live in staff room in the garage and LPA spoke to administrator who admitted that the room was just recently built in as a storage room. The LPA did not observe any city permit and the room was not indicated on the facility sketch, and therefore a citation was issued. On 09/21/2023, the Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) conducted an annual inspection and the report states that the Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) observed a room built inside the garage. The room was equipped with 2 beds, a closet, and there was clothing, shoes, and other personal items. A citation was issued during the annual inspection. During today's visit, LPA Mora observed the room in the garage and it has been emptied out. The City of La Verne Code Enforcement Officer stated that an inspector conducted an inspection at this facility on 10/19/2023 and confirmed that the room in the garage does not have a permit and it is unsafe. The facility was given a deadline to demolish the room by 11/19/2023. Regarding the allegation "facility did not provide a safe environment”, it is alleged that the unpermitted room in the garage is a fire hazard due to electrical wiring installed in this enclosed structure. The City of La Verne Code Enforcement Officer stated that an inspector conducted an inspection at this facility on 10/19/2023 and deemed the room in the garage to be a fire hazard due to the electrical wiring installed. The facility was given a deadline to demolish the room by 11/19/2023. During today's visit, the LPA observed the room and the electrical wiring. LPA also observed that the room has been emptied our and no longer being used. Based on LPA's interviews and records reviewed, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the allegation is found SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 6, and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099-D. Exit interview held and a copy of the report and appeal rights was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2023 · control 28-AS-20231019134710

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87305(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 19, 2023

Alterations to Existing Building or New Facilities: (a) Prior to construction or alterations, all facilities shall obtain a building permit. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. There is a unpermitted room in the garage.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee will obtain a proper city permit for the room built inside the garage or demolish the room if not permitted by the city by 11/19/2023.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 19, 2023

Maintenance and Operation: (a)The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, which poses a potential health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care. The unpermitted room in the garage has been deemed a fire hazard by a Building Inspector and Code Compliance Officerthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2023

Plan of correction: Licensee will obtain a proper city permit for the room built inside the garage or demolish the room if not permitted by the city by 11/19/2023.

Sep 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) V. Maldonado made an unannounced visit at the facility for the purpose of conducting the required annual inspection, using the Care Compliance and Regulatory Enforcement (CARE) Tool, to evaluate the facility. LPA met with Caregiver, Rosalyne Obedoza and explained the purpose for the visit. Administrator, Shelly Yamashiro, arrived shortly after and assisted with the visit. The facility is licensed to serve (6) elderly adults, ages 60 and over. It is approved for (6) non-ambulatory residents, of which (1) may be bedridden in room#4 only, and has a Hospice Waiver approved for (3). The facility is a single-story home, located in a residential area. The home consists of a living room, (4) residents bedrooms, (2) resident bathrooms, a kitchen, dining room, attached garage, and shaded patio with seating in the backyard. The following (12) CARE tool domains were observed and reviewed: Infection Control, Physical Plant/Environment Safety, Operational Requirements, Staffing, Personnel Records/Staff Training, Client Rights/Information, Client Records/Incident Reports, Food Service, Health Related Services, Incident Medical and Dental, Disaster Preparedness, and Emergency Intervention. During today's visit, LPA Maldonado obtained a copy of the resident and staff roster, and conducted a tour of the physical plant with assistance of Caregiver, Rosalyne. The following was observed: There is one central entry point for universal entry screening. The facility has an Infection Control Plan approved and in place. There is sufficient PPE stored for 30-days and readily available for use, throughout the home and stored in the hallway closet. The physical plant inside and out is clean, sanitary and in good repair. All walkways, pathways, and ramps were observed to be free of obstruction/hazards. All resident rooms were inspected and observed to have the required furniture, bedding, linens, chair, adequate lighting, and closet space. At 9:20AM, LPA observed (2) resident beds to have full bed rails and (1) resident bed had half bed-rails. (Report Continued on LIC809-C...) Resident files were reviewed and observed to have written orders indicating the need for the bed rails in place. Each restroom was equipped with a toilet, shower, and wash basin. The restrooms had the required grab bars and non-skid mats/strips. Additional linens and towels for residents were stored in a hallway closet- inspected and observed to be in good repair. All kitchen and laundry equipment was observed clean and operational during today's visit. The water was tested and measured at 112.6*F in bathroom# 1 and 111.3*F in bathroom# 2, which is in compliance. The facility food was inspected and was observed to be sufficient for the amount of residents in care. The requirement was met for 2-day perishables and 7-day non-perishables available. Emergency disaster plan, facility license, personal rights, and complaint procedures are posted as required. The smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and observed to operate properly. Fire extinguishers were observed in the kitchen and in the hallway, with current inspections and were noted to be fully charged. There is a working telephone in the facility for residents to use. No bodies of water were located on the premises. There is adequate seating in common areas for the licensed capacity. Cleaning supplies/toxins were observed stored and locked under the kitchen sink and in the garage, inaccessible to residents. Each entry/exit was equipped with auditory devices and operational. Sharps were observed stored in a kitchen cabinet, locked and inaccessible to residents At 9:45AM, LPA observed a room built inside the garage that appeared to be new. The room was equipped with (2) beds, a closet, and there was clothing, shoes, and other personal items there. Per Caregiver Rosalyne, she and another staff live at the home and occupy that room. Per Administrator Shelly, the property is leased and is unsure if the Lessors obtained proper permits to build the room. She was unable to provide any proof and it is not indicated in the facility sketch or Pre-Licensing report that the facility was licensed with that room. (4) Resident files were reviewed and observed to be complete with, but not limited to: current health screenings, appraisals, admission's agreements, personal rights, and emergency contact information. (5) Staff files were reviewed and were complete with/but not limited to- fingerprint clearances, health screenings, and proof of required annual training. At 12:15PM, (4) Resident medications were reviewed and observed to not have accurate records for centrally stored prescription medications for 4 residents, and there was no record of dosages for several centrally stored medications for Resident# 4 (R4). Interviews were conducted with (2) staff and attempted with (3) residents, as (1) was out in the community, and the others were busy at the time of the visit. Per California Code of Regulations, Title 22, deficiencies were observed during today's visit and will be cited on the LIC809-D. An exit interview was conducted with Caregiver, Rosalyne Obedoza, and a copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 21, 2023

20224 state visits · 4 documents

Oct 7, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff were not wearing masks. Facility is not following COVID-19 protocols.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bennette Pena conducted a subsequent complaint investigation and to deliver findings for the allegations listed above. Upon arrival, LPA met with Caregivers Edwin Uy and Rosalyne Obedoza and explained the purpose of the visit. During the initial visit on 10/05/2022, LPA Pena obtained copies of the staff and resident rosters, staff schedules for Sep-Oct 2022, interviewed Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2), Resident #1(R1), Resident #2(R2) and interviewed S5 over the phone. LPA also reviewed facility's infection control plan, residents’ files, and vaccination records for S1-S2. LPA observed that S1 who greeted LPA at the door was not wearing mask. S1 did not ask LPA to sign in, use hand sanitizer or asked for temperature check. During today's visit, LPA obtained the visitors sign in sheet for June-Sep 2022, interviewed Resident #3 (R3) and attempted to interview Resident #4 (R4) and Resident #5 (R5), and requested a copy of the staff training log for the infection control plan. CONTINUATION ON LIC 9099-C.. Substantiated In regards to the allegation "Facility staff were not wearing masks." It was alleged that on 9/29/2022 at 12:30pm, W1 Ombudsman entered facility through front door and observed S2 without a mask. S2 stated only visitors are to wear a mask when entering the facility. S2 did not try to wear a mask despite having two (2) separate conversations regarding masking. During a previous visit by W2 on 6/14/2022, two Staff S3 and S4 were observed not wearing masks and no Covid screening done upon entry for an indoor visit. On 10/05/2021, LPA conducted an unannounced visit and upon entry into the facility, LPA observed that S1 was not wearing a mask and did not perform the Covid-19 screening protocols: (a) temperature check (b) sign in (c) wash or sanitize hands. Shortly thereafter, S2 arrived at the facility and LPA observed that he was not wearing a mask either and did not wash hands or use hand sanitizer upon entry. LPA also observed R1-R2 not wearing a mask. LPA observed that S1-2 were providing care to the residents unmasked. LPA interviewed S1-2 and both stated that they never wear a mask because they are inside the facility and they did not know it was required. S2 stated that he does not like wearing a mask because it is hard to breathe and only visitors must wear a mask when they enter the facility. LPA attempted to interview R1-2 but both were unable to communicate coherently. LPA interviewed S5 over the phone and stated that she was not aware that the staff do not wear mask inside the facility. S5 indicated that she provides masks for the staff and it is difficult for her to monitor because she is not around every time. S5 stated that she trained the staff regarding Covid-19 screening and protocols but will re-train them. LPA interviewed S3 over the phone who does not work at the facility anymore. S3 acknowledged that he did not wear a mask and conduct the Covid-19 screening when W2 came to visit on 6/14/22 because he forgot. LPA interviewed S4 on the phone and stated she never wear a mask inside the facility. On 10/07/2022, LPA conducted a subsequent visit and interviewed R3-R5. R3 stated that Staff never wear a mask. R3 also indicated that none of the staff did not wear mask when entering her room to serve food and give medication. R4-R5 who are both cognitively impaired stated that they were not sure and cannot remember if Staff wear mask inside the house. LPA also determined that the facility did not have an in-service training log for Infection Control Plan. CONTINUATION ON LIC 9099-C... Regarding the allegation " Facility is not following COVID-19 protocols." It was alleged that on 9/29/2022 at 12:30pm, facility Staff did not screen W1 for COVID-19 symptoms until prompted. While staff was attempting to take W1’s temperature, the forehead thermometer was not working properly and needed a change of battery. During a previous visit by W2 on 6/14/2022, two (2) Staff, S3-4 were not wearing masks and did not screen W2 for COVID-19 symptoms upon entry for an indoor visit. LPA conducted an unannounced visit on 10/05/2022 and observed that S1 who greeted LPA at the door did not ask LPA to sign in, use hand sanitizer or asked for temperature check. S1-2 stated that S5 did not conduct a formal training about Covid-19 protocols but reminded them to wear a mask and screen visitors upon arrival. S1-2 both said that they sometimes forget to wear a mask and do covid-19 screening when visitors arrive at the facility. On 10/06/22, S3 stated that he and S4 forgot to wear a mask and do the Covid-19 screening when W2 visited the facility on 6/14/22. LPA interviewed S4 on the phone and she stated that she never wears a mask inside the facility. S4 also indicated that she did not conduct Covid-19 screening at the door for visitors. On 10/07/22, LPA interviewed R3-5 and all of them stated that they do not know if the staff screens the visitors when they arrive because they stay in their respective rooms most of the time. LPA attempted to interview R1-2 but they were not able to communicate effectively. Based on LPA's observations, and interviews conducted, the preponderance of evidence standard has been met, therefore the above allegations are found SUBSTANTIATED. California Code of Regulations Title 22, Division 6 and Chapter 8 are being cited on the attached LIC 9099D. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview was conducted with Rosalyne Obedoza and a copy of the report, LIC 9099D, and Appeal Rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220929162920

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 8, 2022

87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities (a)(2) To be accorded safe, healthful,and comfortable accommodations, furnishings, and equipment. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: LPA observed taht upon entry into the facility, Staff #1-2 were not wearing masks. Witnesses also indicate that during an unannounced visit to the facility on 9/29/22 and 6/14/22, Staff were not wearing masks which posed a potential risk for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee shall provide additional training to all staff regarding COVID-19 protocols and about wearing mask indoors and fax the completed in-service training log to CCLD on or before the POCdue date. Note: Staff present during LPA's visit wore a mask throughout their shift. LPA advised all staff present to follow COVID-19 protocol.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87470(c)(1)(F) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 8, 2022

87470 - Infection Control Requirements..An Infection Control Plan shall be developed by the licensee and shall be included in the Plan of Operation required by Section 87208. (1) The Infection Control Plan shall include all of the following: (F) Staff shall demonstrate knowledge of and skill in infection control, as appropriate to the job assigned and as evidenced by safe and effective job performance. The requirement is not met as evidenced by: LPA's observations, interviews and records review. LPA observed that staff did not perform the Covid-19 protocols/screening for visitors upon entry to the facility which posed a potential risk for residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 7, 2022

Plan of correction: The Administrator will do in-service training for all the staff regarding COVID-19 protocols and symptom screening to all visitors. Administrator will follow the infection control plan and will fax a copy of the completed in-service training signed by all the staff on or before the POC due date.

Oct 3, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency page: Type B

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) conducted a case management visit as On 9/13/22, LPA Wong conducted an annual inspection under the old license facility name- DIAMOND CREST HOME CARE INC. 197606998 and observed there's a live in staff room in the garage and LPA spoke to administrator YAMASHIRO, SHELLY and admitted that the room was just recently built in as a storage room and LPA did not observe any city permit and the room was not indicate on the facility sketch and the facility was never reported to the Licensing about the change. Deficiencies were noted on LIC809D per Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8. Exit interview was conducted with Staffthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87035(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 17, 2022

87305 Alterations to Existing Building or New Facilities (a) Prior to construction or alterations, all facilities shall obtain a building permit. The requirement was not met as evidenced by LPA observation- LPA observed there's a live in staff room in the garage which was not indicate on the facility sketch and administrator admitted there's no city permit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 3, 2022

Plan of correction: The administrator will ensure prior to construction or alteration, all facilities shall obtain a building permit. The administrator will go and obtain a city permit and also updated the facility sketch and send it to LPA by POC date.

May 11, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst(s) (LPA) Mary Flores conducted a announced case management visit to follow up on corrections needed during pre-licensing visit conducted on 3/21/22. LPA Flores met with applicant Shelly Yamashiro and conducted a tour to review corrections, reviewed resident's files and medication. During today's visit LPA Flores conducted a tour with applicant Shelly Yamashiro and observed the following corrections: LPA observed all medication lock and inaccessible to residents in care. LPA observed all knives, sharps lock and inaccessible to residents. LPA observed all cleaning supplies lock and inaccessible to residents. LPA reviewed residents files and observed current Physician's Report for each resident. LPA observed a shaded area outdoor. LPA observed passage way in the side of the house is kept free of debris and animal feces. LPA observed bathroom #2 has a skit mat in the shower. LPA reviewed medications (supplements) and observed labels per doctor's request and instructions. Component III of the application process was conducted on 3/21/22. Facility meets Title 22 Regulations for physical plant. Exit interview was conducted with Shelly Yamashiro and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 11, 2022
Mar 21, 2022Facility evaluation reportPrelicensingReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analyst(s)(LPA) Mary Flores conducted an announced pre-licensing visit at the facility. LPA Flores met with Shelly Yamashiro Applicant and explained the reason of the visit. Facility has a fire inspection clearance conducted on 12/15/21 for 5 non-ambulatory and 1 bedridden residents over the age of 60 years old. Facility is a single home located in a residential area and has 4 resident rooms, 2 bathrooms, a kitchen, a dining room, a living room, a backyard, and an attached garage/laundry. No large bodies of water were observed. Facility has a fire sprinkle system and smoke detectors were observed and tested throughout the facility. A carbon monoxide was observed by the entrance and in working condition. Facility has sound device system in all exits. LPA Flores conducted a tour with Shelly Yamashiro Applicant and observed the following: Living room: has sufficient sitting area, and activities available. Kitchen: sufficient food was observed for at least 2 days of perishables and 7 days of non-perishables. Cleaning supplies were observed under sink's cabinet not locked. Knives and sharps were observed in a drawer next to stove not locked. Dining room: social distance is observed during meals and activities. Medication cabinet was observed not locked. Bedrooms: All bedrooms have the required furniture, bedding, and medical request for half bed rails, signs for oxygen in bedroom. Bathrooms: Have the required grab bars, toilet is working condition, hand washing sign visible, and soap and paper towels provided. Bathroom #1 has skid mat and water temperature was tested at 118.1 degrees F. and bathroom #2 was missing a skid mat/grips and water temperature was tested at 116.6 degrees F. which is within the required 105-120 degrees F. Facility has hygiene products for residents, additional linens were observed. Emergency kit was observed and has all required items. (CONTINUED ON LIC 809C) Files were reviewed for 5 residents, resident #1 and #4 were missing a yearly Physician's Report. Medication was reviewed for 5 residents and all supplements medication for each resident was not labeled per physician's request. 5 staff files were reviewed. Component III was conducted with applicant Shelly Yamashiro. Applicant must correct the following items within 7 days of today's visit and submit pictures of corrections or documents: Applicant must ensure all medication is lock and inaccessible to residents in care. Applicant must ensure all knives, sharps are lock and inaccessible to residents. Applicant must ensure all cleaning supplies are lock and inaccessible to residents. Applicant must ensure residents in care have a current Physician's Report. Applicant must provide a shaded area outdoor. Applicant must ensure that passage way in the side of the house is kept free of debris and animal feces. Applicant must ensure that bathroom #2 has a skit mat in the shower. Applicant must ensure all medications (supplements) are labels per doctor's request and instructions. Exit interview was conducted with applicant and a copy of this report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 21, 2022

5 of 6 beds were occupied at the March 15, 2024 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

All in Carehome, LLC, licensed since 2022.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2022, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
14
Total complaints
3
Substantiated allegations
6
Type A citations
3
Type B citations
3

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2022, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations30
Type B citations30
Substantiated allegations60
Total complaints30

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about All in Carehome

Is All in Carehome licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is All in Carehome licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has All in Carehome been cited?

3 Type A and 3 Type B citations since 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.

Is All in Carehome still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.

What does All in Carehome cost?

$4,900 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,050–$6,050. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 12 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 232 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,151 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 232 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.

Does All in Carehome take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by All in Carehome, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Casa Colina Hospital is 2.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can All in Carehome keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 3 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

All in Carehome license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “ALL IN CAREHOME”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #198603538. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to All in Carehome, LLC, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 14 state inspection visits since 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 3 Type A and 3 Type B citations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
  • 3 complaints and 6 substantiated allegations on file since 2022, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 13, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    La Verne · 0.5 mi

    Genesis Manor IV

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $4,750 a month to start

    Listed by the home on its own website · October 27, 2026

    On the state record

    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    La Verne · 1.1 mi

    Brethren Hillcrest Homes

    Large community · licensed for 574

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,050 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,150–$5,150

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    San Dimas · 1.2 mi

    Chloie's Cottage II

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,550 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,750–$5,600

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
  • Map

    La Verne · 0.3 mi

    St Matthews Home for the Elderly

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,950 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,050–$6,100

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    La Verne · 0.7 mi

    Heritage Senior Home Care

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $4,800 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,900

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    La Verne · 1.0 mi

    Ars Fountain Homes

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,000 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,100–$6,150

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Los Angeles County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
AC

Call All in Carehome

La Verne · Licensed for 6

(626) 698-9615

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask All in Carehome

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages