All In Carehome is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in La Verne, Los Angeles County, California — state license #198603538, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 12 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated September 19, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

All In Carehome

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · La Verne, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #198603538, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
1158 Beaver Way · La Verne, Los Angeles County
Phone
(626) 698-9615
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ONE MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDROOM/RESIDENT ROOM #4- OKAY FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 3 RESIDENTSState service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 13 times and filed 12 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated September 19, 2025.

Most recent state visit
September 19, 2025
Occupancy at the March 15, 2024 visit
5 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated October 7, 2022 to March 15, 2024. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 8 of 12 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20252 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 19, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 12, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 3 documents
Sep 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 15, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff left the residents unattended while in care

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit on 3/X15/2024 to deliver findings. Initial complaint investigation was conducted on 03/07/2024 by LPA Ramirez and needs further investigation was documented. LPA Ramirez was met by Gloria Estrobo and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Ramirez requested and obtained copies of Resident Roster (LIC 9020), Staff Roster (LIC 500), Staff#1 - 3 interviews(S1 – S3), interview of Witness#1-2 (W1-W2) copy of Staff#2-3 (S2-S3) Personnel Record (LIC 501), Attempted interview of Resident#1-6 (R1-R6), Resident# 1-6 (R1- R6) review of resident records, copies of Resident#1-5 Physician’s Report, and physical plant tour. See 9099-C for continuation. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 15, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240227160538
Mar 7, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not ensure that a hazardous item was made inaccessible to resident. Staff did not maintain the facility in clean and sanitary condition.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation visit on 03/07/2024 regarding the above allegations. LPA Ramirez was met by Caregivers Rosalyne Obedoza and Edwin Uy and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Shelly Yamashiro arrived shortly after to assist with tour. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Ramirez requested and obtained copies of Resident Roster (LIC 9020), Staff Roster (LIC 500), Staff#1 - 3 interviews(S1 – S3), copy of Staff#2-3 (S2-S3) Personnel Record (LIC 501), Attempted interview of Resident#1-6 (R1-R6), Resident# 1-6 (R1- R6) review of resident records, copies of Resident#1-5 Physician’s Report, and physical plant tour. SEE 9099-C for continuation. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 7, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240227160538
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 28, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Oct 26, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Unpermitted construction on the premises. Facility did not provide a safe environment.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Luis Mora conducted an unannounced complaint visit to determine the validity of the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Edwin Uy (Caregiver) and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA interviewed the Administrator (on the phone), Staff 1 - Staff 2 (S1 - S2), City of La Verne Code Enforcement Officer, Owner of the property and Resident 1 - Resident 5 (R1 - R5). LPA also conducted a tour of the facility. The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation "unpermitted construction on the premises”, it is alleged that there was an unpermitted construction done in the garage. Administrator and staff stated that the room in the garage was there prior to the facility getting licensed. The owner of the property also stated the same. (Continued to LIC 9099-C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2023 · control 28-AS-20231019134710
Sep 21, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations3typical 0
Type B citations3typical 0
Substantiated complaints6typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file13typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2025220202433120233312022441
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (626) 698-9615

Is All In Carehome licensed?

Yes — All In Carehome is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in La Verne (Los Angeles County): California license #198603538, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 12 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated September 19, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can All In Carehome care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists All In Carehome with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH ONE MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. BEDROOM/RESIDENT ROOM #4- OKAY FOR BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 3 RESIDENTS

How much does All In Carehome cost?

California's public licensing record does not include All In Carehome's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does All In Carehome accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at All In Carehome through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Los Angeles County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 6 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on March 15, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for All In Carehome?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 13 state visits and 12 dated documents since 2022 for All In Carehome; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated March 15, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff left the residents unattended while in care
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint investigation visit on 3/X15/2024 to deliver findings. Initial complaint investigation was conducted on 03/07/2024 by LPA Ramirez and needs further investigation was documented. LPA Ramirez was met by Gloria Estrobo and explained the purpose of the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Ramirez requested and obtained copies of Resident Roster (LIC 9020), Staff Roster (LIC 500), Staff#1 - 3 interviews(S1 – S3), interview of Witness#1-2 (W1-W2) copy of Staff#2-3 (S2-S3) Personnel Record (LIC 501), Attempted interview of Resident#1-6 (R1-R6), Resident# 1-6 (R1- R6) review of resident records, copies of Resident#1-5 Physician’s Report, and physical plant tour. See 9099-C for continuation. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 15, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240227160538
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure that a hazardous item was made inaccessible to resident. Staff did not maintain the facility in clean and sanitary condition.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Kimberly Ramirez conducted an unannounced initial complaint investigation visit on 03/07/2024 regarding the above allegations. LPA Ramirez was met by Caregivers Rosalyne Obedoza and Edwin Uy and explained the purpose of the visit. Administrator Shelly Yamashiro arrived shortly after to assist with tour. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA Ramirez requested and obtained copies of Resident Roster (LIC 9020), Staff Roster (LIC 500), Staff#1 - 3 interviews(S1 – S3), copy of Staff#2-3 (S2-S3) Personnel Record (LIC 501), Attempted interview of Resident#1-6 (R1-R6), Resident# 1-6 (R1- R6) review of resident records, copies of Resident#1-5 Physician’s Report, and physical plant tour. SEE 9099-C for continuation. SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 7, 2024 · control 28-AS-20240227160538

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedUnpermitted construction on the premises. Facility did not provide a safe environment.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Luis Mora conducted an unannounced complaint visit to determine the validity of the above-mentioned allegations. LPA met with Edwin Uy (Caregiver) and explained the reason for the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: LPA interviewed the Administrator (on the phone), Staff 1 - Staff 2 (S1 - S2), City of La Verne Code Enforcement Officer, Owner of the property and Resident 1 - Resident 5 (R1 - R5). LPA also conducted a tour of the facility. The investigation revealed the following: regarding the allegation "unpermitted construction on the premises”, it is alleged that there was an unpermitted construction done in the garage. Administrator and staff stated that the room in the garage was there prior to the facility getting licensed. The owner of the property also stated the same. (Continued to LIC 9099-C) SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, October 26, 2023 · control 28-AS-20231019134710

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff were not wearing masks. Facility is not following COVID-19 protocols.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Bennette Pena conducted a subsequent complaint investigation and to deliver findings for the allegations listed above. Upon arrival, LPA met with Caregivers Edwin Uy and Rosalyne Obedoza and explained the purpose of the visit. During the initial visit on 10/05/2022, LPA Pena obtained copies of the staff and resident rosters, staff schedules for Sep-Oct 2022, interviewed Staff #1 (S1) and Staff #2 (S2), Resident #1(R1), Resident #2(R2) and interviewed S5 over the phone. LPA also reviewed facility's infection control plan, residents’ files, and vaccination records for S1-S2. LPA observed that S1 who greeted LPA at the door was not wearing mask. S1 did not ask LPA to sign in, use hand sanitizer or asked for temperature check. During today's visit, LPA obtained the visitors sign in sheet for June-Sep 2022, interviewed Resident #3 (R3) and attempted to interview Resident #4 (R4) and Resident #5 (R5), and requested a copy of the staff training log for the infeCDSS inspection report, October 7, 2022 · control 28-AS-20220929162920

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 13 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
13
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(626) 698-9615
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run All In Carehome? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.