Fil-am Home For Seniors Iii is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Claremont, Los Angeles County, California — state license #198603218, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 11 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated January 28, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

2 homes in view

Fil-am Home For Seniors Iii

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Claremont, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #198603218, held since 2020 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
380 W Baseline Rd · Claremont, Los Angeles County
Phone
(714) 408-8996
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careNot on file — ask the home

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 2 RESIDENTS.State service designation983 - RCFE / DEMENTIAthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 13 times and filed 11 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 28, 2026.

Most recent state visit
January 28, 2026
Occupancy at the April 30, 2024 visit
6 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 4 documents with transcribed findings, dated March 16, 2022 to April 30, 2024. 4 of the 4 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (3), “Unsubstantiated” (1). 4 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 4 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 6 of 11 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 28, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Feb 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20243 state visits · 4 documents
Apr 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not prevent resident from sustaining severe fractures while in care Staff did not prevent resident from sustaining pressure injuries

.Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made subsequent visit today to deliver findings for complaint received on 12/02/2022. LPA met with Administrator Toby Miclat and discussed the purpose of the visit. During today’s visit, LPA took a tour of the facility, including random resident rooms, and common areas of the facility. On 12/05/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made initial 10-day visit. During this visit LPA met with Acting Administrator Lea Loaiza and explained the purpose of today's visit. LPA conducted a tour of this facility. LPA did not observe any signs of neglect, or abuse, but did observe health and safety risks. LPA cited facility on Case Management report and 809D. LPA also reviewed files for three residents and obtained relevant documentation. (CONTINUED ON 9099C) Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 30, 2024 · control 28-AS-20221202102319
Apr 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 23, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 9, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 0
Type B citations6typical 0
Substantiated complaints5typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file13typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2020.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20261102025110202434120232222022440
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

≈ $5,000–$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (714) 408-8996

Is Fil-am Home For Seniors Iii licensed?

Yes — Fil-am Home For Seniors Iii is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Claremont (Los Angeles County): California license #198603218, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 11 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated January 28, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Fil-am Home For Seniors Iii care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Fil-am Home For Seniors Iii with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, and hospice care; it does not list bedridden. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON AMBULATORY. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 2 RESIDENTS.

How much does Fil-am Home For Seniors Iii cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Fil-am Home For Seniors Iii's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Fil-am Home For Seniors Iii accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Fil-am Home For Seniors Iii is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

6 of 6 beds occupied (100%) when the state visited on April 30, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Fil-am Home For Seniors Iii?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 13 state visits and 11 dated documents since 2022 for Fil-am Home For Seniors Iii; 4 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 30, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated”. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

4 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not prevent resident from sustaining severe fractures while in care Staff did not prevent resident from sustaining pressure injuries
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
.Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made subsequent visit today to deliver findings for complaint received on 12/02/2022. LPA met with Administrator Toby Miclat and discussed the purpose of the visit. During today’s visit, LPA took a tour of the facility, including random resident rooms, and common areas of the facility. On 12/05/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Alberto Lopez made initial 10-day visit. During this visit LPA met with Acting Administrator Lea Loaiza and explained the purpose of today's visit. LPA conducted a tour of this facility. LPA did not observe any signs of neglect, or abuse, but did observe health and safety risks. LPA cited facility on Case Management report and 809D. LPA also reviewed files for three residents and obtained relevant documentation. (CONTINUED ON 9099C) Substantiated— CDSS inspection report, April 30, 2024 · control 28-AS-20221202102319

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not following COVID-19 protocols. Facility staff locked facility front door from the inside. Facility staff placed a lock on the kitchen door.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
This is an amended report, to previous report dated 1/03/23, with corrections to 9099-D. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted a visit in response to the above allegations. On today's visit, LPA met with Caregiver, Marlon Simbajom who allowed entry into the facility. Administrator, Toby Miclat arrived at the facility a short time later, and assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: Interview(s) with Administrator, and Staff #1, tour of facility, review of facility sign in sheet, and review of PPE supply. Regarding the allegation that facility staff are not following Covid-19 protocols, LPA observed that staff #1 was wearing an N95 face mask on today's visit, however the mask was not worn correctly. Staff #1 was wearing the mask, with 2 straps hanging under his chin. LPA observed that Administrator was wearing a face mask when she arrived at the facility. LPA also observed facility evaluation report, for annual visit dated 12/29/22, it state— CDSS inspection report, February 14, 2023 · control 28-AS-20221228135040
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are not following COVID-19 protocols. Facility staff locked facility front door from the inside. Facility staff placed a lock on the kitchen door.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Angelica Rea conducted a visit in response to the above allegations. On today's visit, LPA met with Caregiver, Marlon Simbajom who allowed entry into the facility. Administrator, Toby Miclat arrived at the facility a short time later, and assisted with the visit. The investigation consisted of the following: Interview(s) with Administrator, and Staff #1, tour of facility, review of facility sign in sheet, and review of PPE supply. Regarding the allegation that facility staff are not following Covid-19 protocols, LPA observed that staff #1 was wearing an N95 face mask on today's visit, however the mask was not worn correctly. Staff #1 was wearing the mask, with 2 straps hanging under his chin. LPA observed that Administrator was wearing a face mask when she arrived at the facility. LPA also observed facility evaluation report, for annual visit dated 12/29/22, it stated that staff #1 was not wearing a face mask and did not screen visitor upon entry. Substa— CDSS inspection report, January 3, 2023 · control 28-AS-20221228135040

2022

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewed. Resident developed a bedsore while in care. 2. Resident is left in soiled diaper(s) for an extended period of time. 3. Resident's diapering needs not being met. 4. Resident is being harassed by other resident in care. 5. Resident was pinched by other resident in care. 6. Resident is not being provided activities while in care. 7. Resident's bathing needs not being met.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Cynthia Chan conducted the subsequent visit for the allegations listed above. LPA met with Staff, Lawton Villanueva and explained the purpose of the visit. LPA spoke with Administrator, Toby Miclat via telephone. The investigation consisted of the following: On 1/4/22, LPA C. Wong initiated the complaint investigation and requested the documents: staff rosters with contact information, all four residents (R1- R4) included LIC601- Identification and Emergency Information, LIC602-Physician Report, LIC622- Centrally Stored Medication Record, LIC 625 - Appraisal Needs and Service Plan and copies of incident reports for Resident #1 (R1). During today’s visit on 3/16/22, LPA Chan interviewed the Administrator, 3 Staff, and 3 Residents. The other resident was not home at time of visit. (Continue on LIC9099C) Unsubstantiated— CDSS inspection report, March 16, 2022 · control 28-AS-20211230171330

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 13 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
6
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
13
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Fil-am Home For Seniors Iii?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Stateside Medical Llc, who operates 3 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(714) 408-8996
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Fil-am Home For Seniors Iii? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.