Essential Care Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Los Angeles, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197610176, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It does not appear on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers the state waiver only, not a home's own payment arrangements. California has 7 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated January 20, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

1 home in view

Essential Care Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Los Angeles, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairHospiceBedriddenMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197610176, held since 2022 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
3132 Waverly Dr. · Los Angeles, Los Angeles County
Phone
(818) 284-7607
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 6 residents
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careApproved for 1 resident

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 18 THROUGH 59 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 7 times and filed 7 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated January 20, 2026.

Most recent state visit
January 20, 2026
Occupancy at the September 26, 2025 visit
1 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 3 documents with transcribed findings, dated February 21, 2024 to September 26, 2025. 3 of the 3 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (1), “Unsubstantiated” (2). 3 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 3 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 6 of 7 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20261 state visit · 1 document
Jan 20, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 2 documents
Sep 26, 2025Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are impeding Ombudsman's access to the home to contact residents.

On 9/26/25, at 8:15 am, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Raymond Comer, conducted an unannuouned, initial10- day visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator,Verzhine Khachtryan, presented official CDSS badge identification, and reason for the visit was disclosed. At 8:25 am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour; LPA observed that Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) information was publicly posted. However, the facility's local LTCO phone number was not displayed on the posting. To investigate this allegation, LPA reviewed facility resident roster, and staff roster. From 8:35 am to 11:30 am, LPA conducted interviews with the Reporting Party, (RP) and Administrator. Allegation: It was reported that staff did not allow the Ombudsman entrance into the facility. [LIC9099C]- Continued Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 26, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250923105953
Mar 19, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not provide scheduled activities for residents. Facility did not provide adequate food service for residents. Facility was not kept free from insects/pests Facility staff withheld fluids to control resident's incontinence. Resident using couch in common area as a sleeping room.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a subsequent visit to the facility to conclude the investigation regarding above allegations. LPA met with administrators Verzhine Khachtryan, and advised her of the complaint. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with the administrator and a physical plaint inspection. Facility did no provide scheduled activities for residents: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that the licensee did not provide activities for the residents in care. Interview with the administrator deny the allegation stating her activities include board games, puzzles and chess. Moreover, when the weather permits, outdoor exercises are conducted as frontyard is large enough to hold activities. Administrator adds birthday/pool parties are also held. LPA conducted a plant inspection and observed sufficient yard space where outdoor activities can be held. LPA also also observed Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 19, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250220154740
20243 state visits · 3 documents
Dec 31, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 19, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Feb 21, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility did not allow the Ombudsman entrance into the facility. Facility administrator was not available on several occasions.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an unannounced visit for the above noted allegations. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Caren Hairpetian and explained the reason for the visit. It was reported that facility did not allow the Ombudsman entrance into the facility. To investigate this allegation on 02/21/2024, between 12:30pm and 1:00pm, staff interviews were initiated. Interviews revealed that no one ever saw or spoke to any Ombudsman. Staff deny not allowing the Ombudsman entrance into the facility because there is a ringer, camaras, a land line phone, and in the day time the facility gate is always open. On this day of the visit, LPA did not have any trouble accessing the faciility. LPA met the Licensee, the Assistant Administrator and caregivers. LPA was allowed entry into the facility. LPA did not observe any health or safety issues. Based on interviews and observation there is not sufficient information to verify this allegation. Therefore, this allegthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 21, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240214092554
Beside homes the same size
Type A citations1typical 0
Type B citations0typical 0
Substantiated complaints1typical 0
Total complaints3typical 0
State visits on file7typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2022.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026110202522120243302022110
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home isn’t on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →

Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
Ask how the 2025 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (818) 284-7607

Is Essential Care Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — Essential Care Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Los Angeles (Los Angeles County): California license #197610176, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 7 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated January 20, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Essential Care Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Essential Care Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, hospice care, and bedridden; it does not list dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 18 THROUGH 59 6 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

How much does Essential Care Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Essential Care Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Essential Care Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Essential Care Assisted Living is not in the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant record we checked August 9, 2026 — that list covers only the state's ALW program, not a home's own payment policies, so ask the home directly about private Medi-Cal arrangements. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services (not room and board) at participating homes; every DHCS-listed home appears on our statewide Medi-Cal page.

Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

1 of 6 beds occupied (17%) when the state visited on September 26, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Essential Care Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 7 state visits and 7 dated documents since 2022 for Essential Care Assisted Living; 3 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated September 26, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Substantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

3 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are impeding Ombudsman's access to the home to contact residents.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
On 9/26/25, at 8:15 am, Licensing Program Analyst, (LPA) Raymond Comer, conducted an unannuouned, initial10- day visit to investigate the above allegation. LPA met with Administrator,Verzhine Khachtryan, presented official CDSS badge identification, and reason for the visit was disclosed. At 8:25 am, LPA conducted a physical plant tour; LPA observed that Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) information was publicly posted. However, the facility's local LTCO phone number was not displayed on the posting. To investigate this allegation, LPA reviewed facility resident roster, and staff roster. From 8:35 am to 11:30 am, LPA conducted interviews with the Reporting Party, (RP) and Administrator. Allegation: It was reported that staff did not allow the Ombudsman entrance into the facility. [LIC9099C]- Continued SubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, September 26, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250923105953
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not provide scheduled activities for residents. Facility did not provide adequate food service for residents. Facility was not kept free from insects/pests Facility staff withheld fluids to control resident's incontinence. Resident using couch in common area as a sleeping room.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a subsequent visit to the facility to conclude the investigation regarding above allegations. LPA met with administrators Verzhine Khachtryan, and advised her of the complaint. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with the administrator and a physical plaint inspection. Facility did no provide scheduled activities for residents: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that the licensee did not provide activities for the residents in care. Interview with the administrator deny the allegation stating her activities include board games, puzzles and chess. Moreover, when the weather permits, outdoor exercises are conducted as frontyard is large enough to hold activities. Administrator adds birthday/pool parties are also held. LPA conducted a plant inspection and observed sufficient yard space where outdoor activities can be held. LPA also also observed UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 19, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250220154740

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not allow the Ombudsman entrance into the facility. Facility administrator was not available on several occasions.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Rosaura Valenzuela conducted an unannounced visit for the above noted allegations. LPA met with Assistant Administrator Caren Hairpetian and explained the reason for the visit. It was reported that facility did not allow the Ombudsman entrance into the facility. To investigate this allegation on 02/21/2024, between 12:30pm and 1:00pm, staff interviews were initiated. Interviews revealed that no one ever saw or spoke to any Ombudsman. Staff deny not allowing the Ombudsman entrance into the facility because there is a ringer, camaras, a land line phone, and in the day time the facility gate is always open. On this day of the visit, LPA did not have any trouble accessing the faciility. LPA met the Licensee, the Assistant Administrator and caregivers. LPA was allowed entry into the facility. LPA did not observe any health or safety issues. Based on interviews and observation there is not sufficient information to verify this allegation. Therefore, this allegCDSS inspection report, February 21, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240214092554

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 7 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
1
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
0
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
1
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
3
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
7
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(818) 284-7607
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Essential Care Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.