West Hills Assisted Living is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in West Hills, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197610121, licensed for 90 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 34 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2022, the most recent dated May 5, 2026 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

7 homes in view

West Hills Assisted Living

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Large community, 90 residents · West Hills, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedWheelchairMemory careHospiceBedridden
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197610121, held since 2021 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
7055 Shoup Avenue · West Hills, Los Angeles County
Phone
(818) 883-7201
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved for 60 residents
Dementia / memory careVerified in record
Hospice careVerified in record
Bedridden careApproved for 15 residents

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 30 AMBULATORY. 60 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 30 RESIDENTS.State service designations935 - ELDERLY · 983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA · 985 - RCFE / HOSPICEthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

“RCFE / Dementia” is the state’s designation for a home with an approved Dementia Care Plan of Operation — it’s recorded separately from the comments above, which is why the memory-care approval may not appear in that text.

Since 2022, the state has visited this home 39 times and filed 34 documents. The most recent is a complaint investigation report, dated May 5, 2026.

Most recent state visit
July 16, 2026
Occupancy at the April 24, 2025 visit
62 of 90 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 22 documents with transcribed findings, dated January 25, 2022 to April 24, 2025. 22 of the 22 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (2), “Unsubstantiated” (20). 22 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 22 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 16 of 34 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20262 state visits · 2 documents
May 5, 2026Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Mar 4, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20253 state visits · 3 documents
Jul 1, 2025Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 24, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are financially abusing resident

At approximately 3:00 p.m. on 04/24/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegations above, LPA interviewed the administrator at 3:15 p.m. today, conducted a record review of pertinent records, including but not limited to an admission agreement, medical assessment, care plan, and financial ledgers at 3:30 p.m., and toured the facility inside and out at 3:45 p.m. Regarding the allegation "Facility staff are financially abusing resident" it was alleged that the facility is the direct Social Security Income (SSI) payee for Resident #1 (R1). Interview with the administrator revealed the facility is not R1’s payee of SSI funds. R1’s previous facility serves as their payee, and that facility sends R1’s full amount of SSI funds each month to West Hills Assisted Living. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 24, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250418143609
Jan 21, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20248 state visits · 8 documents
Dec 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee's lack of supervision led to resident's death

At 9:00 a.m. on 12/30/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. Regarding the allegations above, the Department received an incident report on 09/26/23 which noted that Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) required medical assistance due to injuries on the morning of 09/20/2023. R1 experienced rib pain and a head laceration, and R2 was found bleeding and unresponsive. The facility later submitted R2's death report. LPA and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Naira Margaryan conducted a case management on 09/29/23 and interviewed two (02) staff and three (03) residents between 9:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m., reviewed records at approximately 10:15 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. including but not limited to service plans, medical assessments, incident reports, and an observation log, and toured the facility at approximately 10:40 a.m. The case was referred to the Investigations Branch on 0the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 30, 2024 · control 31-AS-20241101093152
Dec 19, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident escaped from the facility due to lack of supervision

At approximately 10:00 a.m. on 12/19/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with staff and later the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegation above, LPA toured the facility inside and out at 10:00 a.m., interviewed staff, a resident, and a representative between 10:05 a.m. and 10:45 a.m. today, and conducted a record review of pertinent records at 11:00 a.m., including but not limited to medical assessments, a care plan, and hospital discharge paperwork. Regarding the allegation "Resident escaped from the facility due to lack of supervision" it was alleged Resident #1 (R1) had an unsupervised fall on the street out of the facility. Record review of R1’s medical assessment revealed they were ambulatory, capable of leaving the facility unassisted, and had no cognitive impairment. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 19, 2024 · control 31-AS-20241213164110
Aug 13, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Illegal eviction

At approximately 9:00 a.m. on 08/13/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint inspection. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegation above, LPA interviewed staff at 9:30 a.m. and 9:40 a.m., toured the facility at 10:00 a.m., and conducted a records review of documents pertinent to the investigation, including but not limited to a medical assessment, service plan, and identification form. Regarding the allegation “Illegal eviction” it was alleged Resident #1 (R1) was ready to return to the facility from the hospital, and facility staff did not allow R1 to return. Interview with Staff #1 (S1) revealed they visited R1 at the hospital on 08/07/24 to reassess their needs and ensure they were suitable for readmission to the facility. It was discovered that R1 had contracted a communicable disease which was potentially infectious to other residents. Therefore, the facility did not readmit R1 athe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 13, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240809155427
Aug 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Jul 24, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

May 30, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Resident was allowed to leave the facility unassisted resulting in injury

On 5/30/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Melissa Spaeth conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegation(s). LPA Spaeth was met by the Administrator, Chris Salvador. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to conduct interviews and present findings. LPA conducted a physical tour at 12:45 pm until 1:00 pm. LPA observed the facility was clean and did not observe any safety issues. The investigation consisted of the following: On 06/21/2023, LPA Spaeth initiated a complaint investigation. LPA reviewed resident file and received copies of the documentation. LPA Spaeth also interviewed six residents. LPA Spaeth interviewed four staff members via phone call on 5/29/2024 at 3:00 pm until 4:00 pm. Regarding the allegation, Resident was allowed to leave the facility unassisted resulting in injury, it is alleged that a resident (R1) was allowed to leave the facility unassisted and walked to the store. LPA Spaeth reviewed the Physicthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 30, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230614111602
Apr 16, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Financial abuse

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness conducted a subsequent visit and met with Director of Operations Chris Salvador and informed him the reason of the visit. The reason of the visit was to deliver the final findings of the allegation mentioned above. The following was determined. It was alleged that staff financially abused a resident. On 07/07/2022, from 10am to 230pm, LPA conducted the initial visit, obtained documents pertaining to the allegation, and conducted interviews. During today’s visit, LPA obtained additional documents and interviewed staff. From the information obtained, resident # 1 (R1) complained to Administration that (R1) was not receiving (R1’s) money from staff. Upon the facility’s internal investigation, it was revealed to LPA, that (R1) gave staff (R1’) s debit card and pin number to withdraw funds from (R1’s) account. It was alleged staff was not providing receipts of the withdrawals, nor was staff giving the money to (R1). Once (R1) began complaininthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20220706113627
Jan 17, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff are refusing to accept resident back after hospitalization Facility staff are not returning resident's responsible parties' phone calls

At 8:30 a.m. on 01/17/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegations above, LPA interviewed Staff #1 (S1) at 8:45 a.m., Staff #2 (S2) at 9:00 a.m., Staff #3 (S3) at 9:15 a.m., Staff #4 (S4) at 9:45 a.m., Resident #1 (R1) at 10:15 a.m., and R1’s responsible party at 12:45 p.m., toured the facility at 10:00 a.m., and reviewed pertinent records including but not limited to physician’s reports, a face sheet, identification form, needs and service plan, and medical notes at 10:30 a.m. today. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff are refusing to accept resident back after hospitalization” it was alleged the facility did not accept R1 back to the facility on 01/04/2024. Interview with S3 revealed R1 experienced a change of condition in the hospital. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 17, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240109152040
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Nov 2, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff are unlawfully evicting resident

At 11:00 a.m. on 11/02/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the Administrator and Director and disclosed the reason for the visit. Regarding the allegation “Staff are unlawfully evicting resident”, it was alleged the eviction Resident #1 (R1) was unlawful and R1 did not receive an eviction notice.\ To investigate the allegation above, LPA conducted a file review at 9:45 a.m. today, interviewed staff between 11:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., and toured the facility at 11:45 a.m. No immediate health or safety hazards were noted during the time of this visit. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 2, 2023 · control 31-AS-20231031144549
Oct 30, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Sep 29, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations0typical 1
Type B citations2typical 1
Substantiated complaints4typical 2
Total complaints23typical 7
State visits on file39typical 19
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 1,244 licensed larger communities (16+ beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2021.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated2026220202533020248812023121412022880
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$5,000$7,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,500 · statewide low$9,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

What dementia training does staff have, and is the area secured?
Non-ambulatory approval — whole home or specific rooms, and is a spot open?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?

The first two come straight from this home’s record — a brochure won’t answer them.

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (818) 883-7201

Is West Hills Assisted Living licensed?

Yes — West Hills Assisted Living is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in West Hills (Los Angeles County): California license #197610121, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 90 residents. State records list 34 inspection and complaint documents since 2022; the most recent, a complaint investigation report dated May 5, 2026, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can West Hills Assisted Living care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists West Hills Assisted Living with clearances for wheelchair / non-ambulatory, dementia / memory care, hospice care, and bedridden. Clearances describe what the license permits, not day-to-day staffing — confirm current scope and availability with the home directly on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 30 AMBULATORY. 60 NON-AMBULATORY, OF WHICH 15 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 30 RESIDENTS.

How much does West Hills Assisted Living cost?

California's public licensing record does not include West Hills Assisted Living's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does West Hills Assisted Living accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at West Hills Assisted Living through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Los Angeles County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

62 of 90 beds occupied (69%) when the state visited on April 24, 2025. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for West Hills Assisted Living?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 39 state visits and 34 dated documents since 2022 for West Hills Assisted Living; 22 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 24, 2025, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

22 transcribed reports on file

2025

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are financially abusing resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 3:00 p.m. on 04/24/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegations above, LPA interviewed the administrator at 3:15 p.m. today, conducted a record review of pertinent records, including but not limited to an admission agreement, medical assessment, care plan, and financial ledgers at 3:30 p.m., and toured the facility inside and out at 3:45 p.m. Regarding the allegation "Facility staff are financially abusing resident" it was alleged that the facility is the direct Social Security Income (SSI) payee for Resident #1 (R1). Interview with the administrator revealed the facility is not R1’s payee of SSI funds. R1’s previous facility serves as their payee, and that facility sends R1’s full amount of SSI funds each month to West Hills Assisted Living. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, April 24, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250418143609

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedLicensee's lack of supervision led to resident's death
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At 9:00 a.m. on 12/30/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. Regarding the allegations above, the Department received an incident report on 09/26/23 which noted that Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) required medical assistance due to injuries on the morning of 09/20/2023. R1 experienced rib pain and a head laceration, and R2 was found bleeding and unresponsive. The facility later submitted R2's death report. LPA and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Naira Margaryan conducted a case management on 09/29/23 and interviewed two (02) staff and three (03) residents between 9:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m., reviewed records at approximately 10:15 a.m. and 11:30 a.m. including but not limited to service plans, medical assessments, incident reports, and an observation log, and toured the facility at approximately 10:40 a.m. The case was referred to the Investigations Branch on 0CDSS inspection report, December 30, 2024 · control 31-AS-20241101093152
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident escaped from the facility due to lack of supervision
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 10:00 a.m. on 12/19/24 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with staff and later the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegation above, LPA toured the facility inside and out at 10:00 a.m., interviewed staff, a resident, and a representative between 10:05 a.m. and 10:45 a.m. today, and conducted a record review of pertinent records at 11:00 a.m., including but not limited to medical assessments, a care plan, and hospital discharge paperwork. Regarding the allegation "Resident escaped from the facility due to lack of supervision" it was alleged Resident #1 (R1) had an unsupervised fall on the street out of the facility. Record review of R1’s medical assessment revealed they were ambulatory, capable of leaving the facility unassisted, and had no cognitive impairment. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 19, 2024 · control 31-AS-20241213164110
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedIllegal eviction
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 9:00 a.m. on 08/13/24, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint inspection. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegation above, LPA interviewed staff at 9:30 a.m. and 9:40 a.m., toured the facility at 10:00 a.m., and conducted a records review of documents pertinent to the investigation, including but not limited to a medical assessment, service plan, and identification form. Regarding the allegation “Illegal eviction” it was alleged Resident #1 (R1) was ready to return to the facility from the hospital, and facility staff did not allow R1 to return. Interview with Staff #1 (S1) revealed they visited R1 at the hospital on 08/07/24 to reassess their needs and ensure they were suitable for readmission to the facility. It was discovered that R1 had contracted a communicable disease which was potentially infectious to other residents. Therefore, the facility did not readmit R1 aCDSS inspection report, August 13, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240809155427
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident was allowed to leave the facility unassisted resulting in injury
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 5/30/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Melissa Spaeth conducted a subsequent complaint investigation at the above facility to address the following allegation(s). LPA Spaeth was met by the Administrator, Chris Salvador. LPA explained the purpose of this visit was to conduct interviews and present findings. LPA conducted a physical tour at 12:45 pm until 1:00 pm. LPA observed the facility was clean and did not observe any safety issues. The investigation consisted of the following: On 06/21/2023, LPA Spaeth initiated a complaint investigation. LPA reviewed resident file and received copies of the documentation. LPA Spaeth also interviewed six residents. LPA Spaeth interviewed four staff members via phone call on 5/29/2024 at 3:00 pm until 4:00 pm. Regarding the allegation, Resident was allowed to leave the facility unassisted resulting in injury, it is alleged that a resident (R1) was allowed to leave the facility unassisted and walked to the store. LPA Spaeth reviewed the PhysicCDSS inspection report, May 30, 2024 · control 31-AS-20230614111602
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFinancial abuse
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tuesday Cabiness conducted a subsequent visit and met with Director of Operations Chris Salvador and informed him the reason of the visit. The reason of the visit was to deliver the final findings of the allegation mentioned above. The following was determined. It was alleged that staff financially abused a resident. On 07/07/2022, from 10am to 230pm, LPA conducted the initial visit, obtained documents pertaining to the allegation, and conducted interviews. During today’s visit, LPA obtained additional documents and interviewed staff. From the information obtained, resident # 1 (R1) complained to Administration that (R1) was not receiving (R1’s) money from staff. Upon the facility’s internal investigation, it was revealed to LPA, that (R1) gave staff (R1’) s debit card and pin number to withdraw funds from (R1’s) account. It was alleged staff was not providing receipts of the withdrawals, nor was staff giving the money to (R1). Once (R1) began complaininCDSS inspection report, April 16, 2024 · control 31-AS-20220706113627
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are refusing to accept resident back after hospitalization Facility staff are not returning resident's responsible parties' phone calls
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At 8:30 a.m. on 01/17/2024 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegations above, LPA interviewed Staff #1 (S1) at 8:45 a.m., Staff #2 (S2) at 9:00 a.m., Staff #3 (S3) at 9:15 a.m., Staff #4 (S4) at 9:45 a.m., Resident #1 (R1) at 10:15 a.m., and R1’s responsible party at 12:45 p.m., toured the facility at 10:00 a.m., and reviewed pertinent records including but not limited to physician’s reports, a face sheet, identification form, needs and service plan, and medical notes at 10:30 a.m. today. Regarding the allegation “Facility staff are refusing to accept resident back after hospitalization” it was alleged the facility did not accept R1 back to the facility on 01/04/2024. Interview with S3 revealed R1 experienced a change of condition in the hospital. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 17, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240109152040

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff are unlawfully evicting resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At 11:00 a.m. on 11/02/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the Administrator and Director and disclosed the reason for the visit. Regarding the allegation “Staff are unlawfully evicting resident”, it was alleged the eviction Resident #1 (R1) was unlawful and R1 did not receive an eviction notice.\ To investigate the allegation above, LPA conducted a file review at 9:45 a.m. today, interviewed staff between 11:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m., and toured the facility at 11:45 a.m. No immediate health or safety hazards were noted during the time of this visit. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, November 2, 2023 · control 31-AS-20231031144549
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff do not maintain facility in good repair. Staff are not meeting resident's need for clean linens. Staff are not meeting resident's incontinence care needs.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with the administrator, Chris Salvador, and care coordinator, Mike Dy, and advised them of the complaint. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with residents and staff, and a physical plant inspection, which were conducted between 9:15am to 11:15am. A record review between 11:15am and 12:30pm was also made. Staff do not maintain facility in good repair: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that Resident 1's (R1) room is really hot. Room temperature is not maintained in a comfortable level. R1 has asked for a change of the air conditioning (AC) unit because the AC in their room is very old and does not work properly. During the course of the investigation, LPA conducted a physical plant inspection. The building is two stories. LPA inspected five (5) of five (5) resident rooms on the first floor, and five (5) of five (5) resident rooms oCDSS inspection report, July 28, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230721144737
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not provide residents transportation to medical appointment.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
On 06/26/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Evelin Rios conducted an unannounced complaint visit for the above allegation. LPA arrived at the facility at 10:05 a.m. and was greeted by staff #1(S1) at reception. S1 called the Director of Operation/Administrator Chris Salvador. LPA explained to Chris the purpose of the visit. Entrance interview conducted. At 10:26 a.m. LPA and Chris conducted a physical plant tour to ensure the health and safety of the residents in care. No issues or concerns were observed. From 10:31 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. LPA interviewed at random six (6) out of fifty-four (54) residents. From 11:31 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. LPA reviewed resident records and obtained documents relevant to this investigation and reviewed the facility Program submitted to Community Care Licensing (CCL). Allegation: Facility does not provide residents transportation to medical appointment. It is alleged a resident has not been provided transportation to their medical appointments and that instead aCDSS inspection report, June 26, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230621164128
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not refill resident’s medication on time Staff did not respond to resident's call button Staff sleeping during working hours
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At 9:00 a.m. on 03/23/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with a facility representative and disclosed the reason for the visit. At 9:10 a.m. LPA toured the facility and observed no immediate health or safety concerns. At 10:10 a.m. LPA spoke with the Administrator on the phone. The Administrator stated the facility representative could sign licensing documents in their absence. Staff did not refill resident’s medication on time Regarding the allegation above, it was alleged Resident #1 (R1) did not have their medication refilled before it ran out. LPA conducted a records review on 10/26/22 at 2:30 p.m. Facility documents revealed that R1’s medication arrived on the scheduled day. LPA interviewed facility Director on 08/02/2022 around 10:45 a.m., a facility med tech on 08/02/2022 at 12:43 p.m., and R1’s doctor and pharmacy technician on 10/14/2022 from 3:30 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 23, 2023 · control 31-AS-20220726164145
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff did not ensure resident received their mail while in care. Staff do not ensure that food/drinks are of the quality necessary to meet the needs of the residents.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At 9:00 a.m. on 03/23/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with a facility representative and disclosed the reason for the visit. At 9:10 a.m. LPA toured the facility and observed no immediate health or safety concerns. At 10:10 a.m. LPA spoke with the Administrator on the phone. The Administrator stated the facility representative could sign licensing documents in their absence. Staff did not ensure resident received their mail while in care. Regarding the allegation above, it was alleged Resident #1 (R1) did not receive their mail. LPA interviewed residents and staff on 12/29/2022 from 1:50 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. Staff and Director stated mail gets delivered to the front desk. It is then sorted into individual mailboxes. The mail is either delivered to residents, or residents pick up their mail at the front desk. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 23, 2023 · control 31-AS-20221227105313
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
At 9:00 a.m. on 03/23/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with a facility representative and disclosed the reason for the visit. At 9:10 a.m. LPA toured the facility and observed no immediate health or safety concerns. At 10:10 a.m. LPA spoke with the Administrator on the phone. The Administrator stated the facility representative could sign licensing documents in their absence. Regarding the allegation above, it was alleged the fan in the bathroom of Resident #1 (R1) was broken. LPA and R1 inspected the fan on 12/29/2022 at 2:15 p.m. R1 turned the switch on and the fan did not operate. LPA interviewed R1 and the Director on 12/29/2022 from 1:50 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. R1 stated they did not report the issue to the facility. The Director confirmed no reports for maintenance were received. LPA informed the Director about the required maintenance at approximately 2:45 p.m. on 12/29/2022, and the Director immediately sCDSS inspection report, March 23, 2023 · control 31-AS-20221228083700
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident is not free from intimidation or other actions of a punitive nature by facility staff. Facility staff are allowing residents to smoke inside the facility. Facility air conditioning is in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tihesha Smith made an unannounced complaint visit to this facility at 9:20 am to deliver findings. LPA Smith met with facility staff and disclosed the purpose of this visit. The administrator was contacted and arrived later. During initial visit, on 12/22/2022, LPA Smith conducted tour of physical plant at 11:40 am, conducted interviews with administrators and requested documents relevant to the investigation. LPA Smith made a subsequent visit to this facility on 01/31/23. From 12:40 pm-3:00 pm, LPA interviewed six (6) staff, five (5) residents, conducted a physical plant tour and requested pertinent documents at 12:45 PM. LPA was unable to interview Resident #1 (R1) due to time constraints. The following two out of three allegations for Complaint Control #: 31-AS-20221221094559: Facility staff are allowing residents to smoke inside the facility Facility air conditioning is in disrepair was delivered on 01/31/23 and both allegations were UNSUBSTANTIATEDCDSS inspection report, March 9, 2023 · control 31-AS-20221221094559
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair Staff do not ensure that residents are provided daily activities Staff do not treat residents with dignity or respect Staff are not providing agreed upon transportation service
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
***This report was amended to change the findings of the allegation "Facility is in disrepair"**** At approximately 9:15 a.m. on 03/02/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with staff and later the Administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. --- Facility is in disrepair --- LPA interviewed staff and residents from 9:45 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. LPA conducted a records review at 9:55 a.m. and toured the physical plant at approximately 10:25 a.m. No immediate health or safety concerns were observed. Regarding the allegation above, it was alleged the facility did not have hot water for four days. From record review, the facility notified Community Care Licensing (CCL) of the maintenance via email. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, March 2, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230228114452
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is unlawfully evicting resident
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At approximately 3:15 p.m. on 02/08/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with staff and disclosed the reason for the visit. Regarding the allegation above, it was alleged Resident #1 (R1) is being unlawfully evicted. LPA conducted a file review at 1:45 p.m., interviewed staff at 4:05 p.m., and toured the facility at 3:30 p.m. From file review, the facility notified Community Care Licensing in a timely manner of R1’s eviction on 08/19/2022. R1 was notified of the eviction. The Los Angeles Sherriff’s Department posted R1’s Notice to Vacate on 01/14/2023. Based on file review, although the allegation may have happened or is valid, there is insufficient evidence to prove the alleged violation did or did not occur. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, February 8, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230203152728
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff are allowing residents to smoke inside the facility. Facility air conditioning is in disrepair.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Tihesha Smith made a subsequent unannounced complaint visit to this facility and met with administrator and explained the purpose of this visit. During initial visit, on 12/22/2022, LPA Smith conducted tour of physical plant at 11:40 am, conducted interviews with administrators and requested documents relevant to the investigation. Facility staff are allowing residents to smoke inside the facility. At approximately 12:40 pm-3:00 pm LPA interviewed six (6) staff, five (5) residents conducted a physical plant tour and requested pertinent documents at 12:45 PM. LPA unable to interview Resident #1 (R1) due to time contraints. LPA interview with five (5) out of five (5) residents revealed they have not smoked or seen any residents (Cont to 809C) UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 31, 2023 · control 31-AS-20221221094559
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility does not have a certified administrator Staff mismanaged resident's funds
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
At 1:35 p.m. on 01/04/2023 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the Administrator designee and disclosed the reason for the visit. LPA toured the facility and observed no immediate health or safety concerns. LPA interviewed the Administrator designee at 1:45 p.m. and conducted another file review at 1:55 p.m. Regarding the allegation “Facility does not have a certified administrator”, it was alleged the administrator designee served as the facility administrator duties without proper certification. From file review, the administrator designee was not listed in Community Care Licensing’s (CCL) list of pending and active Administrator certificate. The administrator designee did not have an active certificate. The designee explained that the licensees Ginger and Jeffrey Po maintained active administrator certificates. LPA confirmed this to be true from a 1:55 p.m. file review of the CCL website. UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, January 4, 2023 · control 31-AS-20221230080630

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 39 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for larger communities (16+ beds), computed across all 1,244 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
0
typical for this size: 1
Type B citations
2
typical for this size: 1
Substantiated complaints
4
typical for this size: 2
Total complaints
23
typical for this size: 7
State visits on file
39
typical for this size: 19
See the full inspection record on the state's site →
Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(818) 883-7201
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run West Hills Assisted Living? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.