Small home · Licensed for 6 · North Hollywood
Amy's Paradise Home of Angels
11950 Roscoe Blvd, North Hollywood, CA 91605Licensed since 2021
Overview
No openings reported
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
State approvals not on file: wheelchair, dementia, hospice and bedridden approvals.
State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR 6 AMBULATORY RESIDENTS
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Amy's Paradise Home of Angels: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines, staying through hospice and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$3,600a month to start
Likely $2,950–$4,450
From 11 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$3,600likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$3,600likely $2,950–$4,450
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $2,950–$4,650
- $3,600
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $3,500–$7,950
- $6,100
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes11 nearby homes publish starting rates of $2,500 to $7,500
11 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$4,550.
- Blue Horizon EldercareNorth Hollywood · 0.5 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Blue HorizonNorth Hollywood · 0.5 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Breath of Sunshine HarmonyArleta · 2.6 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Hollywood Healthy LivingSun Valley · 2.8 mi · Small home$3,300Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- Ardenville Home Care IBurbank · 2.9 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on A Place for Mom · seen September 9, 2026
- Seniors' HavenBurbank · 3.6 mi · Small home$4,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Breath of SunshineNorth Hills · 3.8 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- California State Health GroupNorth Hills · 3.9 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Mom and Dads RetreatVan Nuys · 4.2 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
- The LighthouseToluca Lake · 4.4 mi · Mid-size home$2,500Listed on AssistedLiving.com · seen September 9, 2026
- Grant Serenity Homes of SF ValleyVan Nuys · 4.6 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
11950 Roscoe Blvd, North Hollywood, CA 91605Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Pacifica Hospital of the ValleyHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.3 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197609980 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 8 of 16 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 2 “Substantiated”.
20262 state visits · 4 documents
Apr 9, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff engaged in an inappropriate relationship with resident. Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne conducted a follow-up complaint visit for the above allegations. LPA arrived to the facility at 01:28 PM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted the facility Administrator Emma Avetisyan. The Administrator informed LPA that they were unable to come to the facility at the time of the visit. Facility representative Meri Tarposhyan (S2) arrived to the facility at 01:45 PM. Entrance interview was conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. During today’s visit, the LPA conducted a physical plant tour and delivered findings between 01:30 PM and 04:00 PM. The allegation of “Staff engaged in an inappropriate relationship with resident” alleges that facility staff #1 (S1) engaged in an inappropriate relationship with Resident #1 (R1) while R1 resided at the facility. On 05/30/2025, LPA interviewed S1, and during the interview S1, they confirmed that they and R1 were married at the facility. S1 provided LPA with a copy of the marriage certificate between them and R1 with an effective date of 11/01/2024. CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C. Substantiated Interviews with Witness #1 (W1) and Witness #2 (W2) revealed concerns that R1 was manipulated by the facility into marrying S1 for immigration or green card purposes. Interviews with R1 revealed that R1 did not feel pressured into marrying S1, and R1 denied any coercion from S1 or facility staff. Interviews with S1 and R1 revealed that they intended to go to the immigration office to obtain documents for S1, but no such visit took place due to issues in obtaining the required perquisite documentation. LPA reviewed R1’s medical documentation and facility file. R1 was determined by their physician to not have cognitive deficit, was able to make their own decisions, and was able to manage their own finances. Additionally, LPA observed R1 to be self-responsible and did not have a Power of Attorney (POA). On 03/18/2026, LPA interviewed S1 and R1. LPA was informed that as of 02/17/2026, S1 and R1 were legally separated. Based on interviews and record review there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation of “Staff engaged in an inappropriate relationship with resident.” Therefore, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. The allegation of “Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident” alleges that the facility did not seek timely medical attention for R1 following a medical emergency which occurred at the facility. Interviews with S1 revealed that on 05/14/2025, R1 suffered a medical emergency at the facility and required hospitalization. S1 stated that symptoms, including diarrhea, were first noticed the day prior (05/13/2025) and were monitored by S1. S1 stated that on 05/14/2025, they observed blood in R1’s stool. S1 reported observing the blood for approximately two (2) to three (3) hours before calling the Administrator and later emergency services to transport R1 to the hospital. LPA interviewed the Administrator who stated that R1 appeared fine on the morning of 05/14/2025, but around 12:00 PM R1’s blood pressure was observed by S1 to be rapidly dropping. Administrator stated that they received a follow-up call from S1 at approximately 05:00 PM informing them that R1 was not doing well. Administrator stated that an ambulance was called for R1 at approximately 06:00 PM and R1 was transported to the hospital for treatment. LPA reviewed the hospital paperwork from R1’s 05/14/2025 hospitalization. LPA observed that R1 was admitted to the hospital in critical condition with severe hyperkalemia (high potassium levels in blood) and later suffered cardiac arrest. Based on interviews, LPA observed a delay in seeking timely medical attention for R1 of more than twenty-four (24) hours from the initial onset of symptoms and six (6) hours of the presentation of severe symptoms. Based on interviews and record review there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation of “Staff did not seek timely medical attention for resident.” Therefore, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 9099-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2026 · control 29-AS-20250528153637
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 10, 2026
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) ...by compliance with the following: (1) The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the facility did not seek timely medical attention for R1 following the presentation of symptoms of a medical emergency which posed an immediate health risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2026
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to conduct training with all staff members of the facility covering the importance of noticing signs and symptoms of a medical emergency and seeking medical attention in a timely manner. Administrator agreed to submit proof of completed training to CCLD no later than POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 23, 2026
87468.1 Personal Rights of Residents... (a) Residents... shall have all of the following personal rights: (1) To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as S1 entered into an inappropriate relationship with R1 through their marriage and subsequent divorce which posed a potential personal rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2026
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to conduct a meeting with staff members of the facility covering what constitutes appropriate staff/resident relationship and what behaviors are acceptable for facility staff. Administrator agreed to submit proof of the meeting to CCLD no later than POC due date.
Apr 9, 2026Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationDeficiency pages: Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a continuation of the required annual visit at 01:28 PM. LPA met with facility staff member Emma Elazyan (S1) who contacted the facility Administrator Emma Avetisyan. The Administrator informed LPA that they were unable to come to the facility at the time of the visit. Facility representative Meri Tarposhyan (S2) arrived to the facility at 01:45 PM. Entrance interview was conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. Beginning at approximately 01:50 PM, the LPA, along with S2 toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen area to be clean. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility had a sufficient supply of two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. LPA observed secured cabinets which contained knives and other sharp objects, resident medications, facility files, and an incomplete first aid kit which was missing a first aid manual. LPA informed S2 that a complete first aid kit shall be maintained and be readily available and shall include a current edition of a first aid manual. S2 expressed understanding and agreed to obtain a current first aid manual for the facility. LPA observed the kitchen to contain adequate emergency food supplies. LPA observed a fire extinguisher mounted in the kitchen to be fully charged and purchased on 09/24/2025. CONTINUED ON LIC 809C. OUTDOOR SPACE: The facility has two (2) emergency exit gates. One (1) is located in the front yard and one (1) is located in the backyard of the facility. LPA observed clear passageways for emergency exit use. The facility had adequate shaded seating outdoors for resident use. LPA observed the facility’s backyard to contain an additional refrigerator which contained extra food items. LPA observed the side gate and front gate of the facility to be missing properly functioning auditory alarms. LPA informed S2 that an auditory device or other staff alert feature to monitor exits on exterior doors and perimeter fence gates shall be present and functional. S2 expressed understanding and agreed to install working auditory alarms on both gates. COMMON AREAS: This included the living room, hallway, and dining area. The living room was observed to be clean and in good repair. The living room contained adequate seating for resident use. LPA observed the living room to contain a television and activities for resident use. LPA observed a hallway closet which contained extra linens and care supplies. LPA observed the dining area to be clean and properly furnished at the time of the visit. The dining area contained a dining table with adequate seating for resident use. The facility’s fire and carbon monoxide alarms were tested at 03:04 PM and were functional at the time of the test. BEDROOMS: There are four (4) bedrooms in the facility; two (2) are a dual occupancy rooms and two (2) are single occupancy rooms. LPA and S2 toured all four (4) bedrooms. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. LPA observed bedroom #1’s closet doors to be in disrepair. LPA notified S2 who stated that a repairman was coming later today (04/09/2026) to perform repairs to the doors. LPA observed unsecured paints located in the closet of bedroom #2. LPA notified S2 who secured the items at the time of the visit. BATHROOMS: There are two (2) bathrooms at the facility. One (1) bathroom is designated as private resident bathroom, and one (1) bathroom is designated as a shared resident bathroom. Both resident bathrooms were observed to be clean and in good repair and were equipped with nonskid surfaces. LPA observed the shared resident bathroom’s tub to be consistently leaking water from the faucet. LPA notified S2 who agreed to schedule a repairman to perform repairs to the tub. Grab bars were observed in all resident showers and near the shared resident toilet, all were properly secured. CONTINUED ON LIC 809C. BATHROOMS CONT: LPA observed the private resident bathroom’s toilet to be missing grab bars. LPA interviewed Resident #1 (R1) who resided in the bedroom that was attached to the private bathroom. R1 confirmed that they do not utilize the private bathroom and instead prefer to use the shared resident bathroom. LPA informed S2 that grab bars shall be maintained for each toilet; bathtub and shower used by residents. Since no resident utilizes the private bathroom this is considered a technical violation and no deficiency is being issued. LPA informed S2 that if R1 or any future resident utilizes the private bathroom appropriate grab bars will need to be installed near the toilet. S2 expressed understanding and agreed to comply with this regulation. Additionally, LPA observed an unsecured bottle of Clorox air freshener located in the private bathroom. LPA notified S2 who secured the bottle at the time of the visit. The water temperature was measured to be between 116.1 and 118.0 degrees Fahrenheit, which is in compliance with regulation. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as they pertain to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly; the facility’s last emergency disaster drill was conducted on 01/25/2026. The facility’s emergency disaster plan is up to date but contained inaccurate information on the storage location of emergency supplies. LPA notified S2 who agreed to complete an update to the facility’s emergency disaster plan. The emergency disaster plan and the infection control plan are reviewed/updated annually by the facility’s Administrator. INTERVIEWS: LPA interviewed two (2) residents. Both residents interviewed stated that the staff treat them well and are attentive to their needs. Both residents had no concerns with the facility. One (1) staff interview was conducted with the assistance of S2 acting as a translator. The staff member interviewed was knowledgeable on the resident’s rights, the forms of abuse, and the appropriate reporting procedures for suspected abuse. During today’s visit LPA obtained a copy of the facility’s LIC 500, resident roster, emergency disaster plan, and current liability insurance. The facility Administrator was unable to come to the facility to sign this report but has designated S2 to sign on their behalf. This report was read to the Administrator via telephone call. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2026
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(8)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 23, 2026
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) ... by compliance with the following: (8) ...The kit...shall contain at least the following: (A) A current edition of a first aid manual... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the facility did not have a current edition of a first aid manual which poses a potential health or safety risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2026
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to obtain a first aid manual and to send proof of the manual at the facility to CCLD no later than POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87705(d) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 23, 2026
87705 Care of Persons with Dementia (d) The licensee shall ensure that the facility has an auditory device or other staff alert feature to monitor exits on exterior doors and perimeter fence gates... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the side and front gates were missing properly functioning auditory alarms which poses a potential safety risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2026
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to send proof of appropriately installed and functioning auditory alarms on the identified gates to CCLD no later than POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87309(c) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 23, 2026
87309 Storage Space and Access (c) ... the licensee shall...ensure that ... other potentially toxic substances... are stored so as not to pose a hazard to residents. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as a Clorox spray air freshener was unsecured and paints were stored in a resident's room who was at risk if allowed access to toxic substances which posed a potential health and safety risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2026
Plan of correction: S2 secured the items at the time of the visit. Administrator agreed to conduct training with all staff on the importance of securing toxic substances. Administrator agreed to submit proof of the completed training to CCLD no later than POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 23, 2026
87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times.... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the closet doors in bedroom #1 and the shared tub were in disrepair which poses a potential safety or personal rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 9, 2026
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to complete repairs to the identified items and to send proof of the completed repairs to CCLD no later than POC due date.
Mar 18, 2026Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff mismanage residents' medication.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne conducted a complaint visit for the above allegation. LPA arrived to the facility at 09:44 AM. LPA met with facility staff member Emma Elazyan (S1) who contacted the facility administrator Emma Avetisyan. The Administrator informed LPA that they were unable to come to the facility at the time of the visit. Facility representative Meri Tarposhyan (S2) arrived to the facility at approximately 11:50 AM. Entrance interview was conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. During today’s visit, the LPA conducted a brief physical plant tour, a medication and file review for six (6) residents, obtained copies of pertinent documentation, and conducted interviews with S1, S2, and one (1) resident between 09:55 AM and 02:00 PM. Continued on LIC 9099C. Substantiated The allegation of “Staff mismanage residents' medication.” Alleges that facility staff mismanage resident’s medications and that facility staff inappropriately administer sleeping pills to residents. LPA conducted a medication review for six (6) residents. LPA interviewed Staff #1(S1) and Staff #2 (S2). Both staff members denied administering any medications not prescribed by a physician, including sleeping aids, to residents. LPA observed two (2) resident’s Centrally stored medication and destruction record sheets (CSMDRs) to contain inaccurate records of the resident’s prescribed medications. Additionally, during the audit of resident’s medications LPA observed a total of twenty three (23) medications across six (6) residents to have errors in the medication count. LPA and S2 observed the CSMDRs for six (6) residents and confirmed that the amount of medications remaining in the bottles did not match the amount of medications that should be left based on the recorded start date and medication administration instructions. The resident interviewed did not have concerns with the administration of medications at the facility. LPA did not observe evidence of unprescribed sleeping pills being administered to residents but did observe evidence of medication mismanagement. Based on interviews and record review there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation of “Staff mismanage residents' medication.” Therefore the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. The facility Administrator was unable to come to the facility to sign this report but has designated S1 to sign on their behalf. This report was read to the Administrator via telephone call. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiency was cited (refer to LIC 9099-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued and appeal rights providedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260311081619
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(4) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 19, 2026
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) ... by compliance with the following: (4) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation, record review and interview the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as twenty three medications across six residents had errors in the medication count which poses an immediate health risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026
Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to conduct an immediate training with all staff handling resident medications covering best practices for medication administration and to submit proof of the completed training to CCLD no later than POC due date.
Mar 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 09:44 AM. LPA met with facility staff member Emma Elazyan (S1) who contacted the facility administrator Emma Avetisyan. The Administrator informed LPA that they were unable to come to the facility at the time of the visit. Facility representative Meri Tarposhyan (S2) arrived to the facility at approximately 11:50 AM. Entrance interview was conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. The following was observed: MEDICATION REVIEW: Medication review began at 09:55 AM. Medications for six (6) of six (6) residents were observed. LPA observed Resident #1’s (R1) medications to be improperly documented on their centrally stored medication and destruction record sheet (CSMDR). LPA informed S2 who stated that the medications arrived at the facility at approximately 08:00 PM the previous night (03/17/2026) and had not yet been documented on the CSMDR. Additionally, LPA observed one (1) medication from Resident #2 (R2) to not be logged appropriately on their CSMDR. During medication review LPA observed a total of twenty three (23) medications across all six (6) residents to have errors in the medication count. LPA and S2 observed the CSMDRs for all six (6) residents and confirmed that the amount of medications remaining in the bottles did not match the amount of medications that should be left based on the recorded start date and medication administration instructions. S2 was unable to provide LPA with a justification as to why the medication count was incorrect. This deficiency was cited under a complaint report for this facility. No deficiency for this violation is being generated under this report. Continued on LIC 809C. RECORD REVIEW: Record review began at 11:50 AM. Staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, consent forms, and personal rights. Four (4) staff files were reviewed. One (1) staff file was not located at the facility for LPA's review. LPA informed S2 that all personnel records shall be maintained at the facility for review. Four (4) staff files were observed to contain expired 1st aid certifications. Six (6) resident files were reviewed. One (1) resident file was observed to contain a blank Appraisal Needs and Services (ANS) plan, and two (2) resident files contained ANS that were created more than twelve (12) months prior. LPA informed S2 that appraisals shall be updated in writing as frequently as necessary or once every 12 months, whichever occurs first, to note significant changes in condition. LPA observed two (2) resident admission agreements to be missing the rate for all basic services which the facility is required to provide. LPA observed Resident #3 (R3)’s resident file to contain a physician’s report dated 11/05/2024. LPA informed S2 and the Administrator that Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) is requesting an updated physician’s report for R3 due to a changes in the condition of R3 since the report was created. Due to time constraints LPA will return at a later date to conduct a physical plant tour, a review of the infection control plan and emergency disaster plan, interviews with residents and staff, and to collect copies of pertinent documents. The facility Administrator was unable to come to the facility to sign this report but has designated S1 to sign on their behalf. This report was read to the Administrator via telephone call. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-Ds): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 18, 2026
The state marks this report as 8 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 6. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20252 state visits · 2 documents
May 30, 2025Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne conducted unannounced case management deficiencies visit at the facility today. LPA arrived to the facility at 10:15 AM. LPA met with the facility staff, staff #1 (S1) who contacted the facility Administrator Emma Avetisyan via telephone call. The Administrator arrived to the facility at approximately 12:30 PM. Entrance interview conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. During today’s visit, the LPA conducted a physical plant tour to ensure there are no health and safety hazards, collected copies of pertinent documents, conducted a medication audit for one (1) resident, and conducted interviews with the Administrator, one (1) staff member, one (1)resident, and one (1) witness between 10:20 AM and 02:00 PM During the physical plant tour LPA observed the flooring near the exit located in the kitchen to be bubbling up, held together with tape, and in disrepair. Additionally, LPA observed the closet door located in bedroom # 2 to be detached from the railing and in disrepair. LPA observed a light switch cover in the shared resident bathroom to be broken and had sharp exposed plastic. LPA informed the Administrator of the items that were in disrepair and the Administrator agreed to perform the needed repairs to the identified items. During an interview with S1 and the Administrator LPA was informed that resident #1 (R1) was recently hospitalized after a medical incident. LPA reviewed the facility file and their inbox and did not observe an incident report submitted for the hospitalization of R1. LPA informed the Administrator that incidents must be reported to Community Care Licensing Division no later than seven days following the occurrence of the incident. The Administrator expressed understanding and submitted a report for the incident at the time of the inspection. Continued on LIC 809C. During medication review LPA observed R1's medications. LPA observed one (1) medication to not be listed on R1's centrally stored medication and destruction record sheet (CSMDR). LPA informed the Administrator of the discrepancy. The Administrator agreed to conduct a medication audit and submit an accurate CSMDR for R1 to CCLD. During file review LPA observed the resident file for resident #2 (R2). LPA observed this resident’s physician report to identify the resident as “Ambulatory” and “Able to feed self”. During the visit LPA observed R2 to be utilizing a wheelchair and being fed by S1. LPA asked the Administrator about the condition of R2. The Administrator confirmed that R2 was a Non-Ambulatory resident based on their physical condition and mental diagnosis. The Administrator stated that this is a recent change of condition, and the facility had not yet obtained an updated physician report for the change in condition. LPA informed the Administrator that the facility’s fire clearance does not allow them to accept or retain Non-Ambulatory residents. LPA informed the Administrator that this is a violation of their fire clearance and poses an immediate safety risk to clients in care. LPA informed the Administrator that this is a zero-tolerance violation and an immediate civil penalty in the amount of $500 will be assessed on today’s date (05/30/2025). The Administrator expressed understanding and confirmed that they will contact the local fire department and notify them that they have a Non-Ambulatory resident. Additionally, the Administrator confirmed that the resident would be relocated to a licensed facility that has an appropriate fire clearance to care for Non-Ambulatory residents. During the file review for R2 LPA observed R2’s physician’s report to be missing a negative TB test. LPA asked the Administrator if they were able to provide proof of a negative TB test for the identified resident. The Administrator stated that the physician’s report was transferred from another facility and the facility had not yet obtained an updated physician report for R2. LPA informed the Administrator that they were recently cited for a violation of CCR 87458(c)(1)(A) on 02/20/2025. LPA informed the Administrator that this is a repeat violation of the same regulation within a 12-month period and a civil penalty in the amount of $250 will be assessed on today’s date (05/30/2025) for a repeat violation. The Administrator was unavailable to sign this report but has designated S1 to sign on their behalf. This report was read to the Administrator via telephone call. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies and civil penalties were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 30, 2025
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87202(a) · Plan of correction due date: May 31, 2025
87202 Fire Clearance (a) All facilities shall maintain a fire clearance approved by the city, county, or city and county fire department, or district providing fire protection services, or the State Fire Marshal... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and file review the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above as one resident was observed to be non-ambulatory for which the facility does not have an approved fire clearance which poses an immediate safety risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 30, 2025
Plan of correction: The Administrator stated that they will contact the local fire department and notify them that they have a Non-Ambulatory resident. Additionally, the Administrator confirmed that the resident would be issued an eviction notice and be relocated to an appropriate facility. Licensee will submit their plan on how they will evacuate the identified resident safely from the facility in the event of a fire or emergency. Licensee will submit proof of corrections no later than POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87458(c)(1)(A) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 13, 2025
87458 Medical Assessment (c) The medical assessment shall include, but not be limited to: (1) A physical examination of the resident indicating...all of the following: (A) Communicable tuberculosis. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on file review the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above as one resident file was observed to be missing proof of a negative TB test which poses an potential health risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 30, 2025
Plan of correction: The Licensee will obtain an updated physician report for R2 confirming a negative TB test. The Licensee may also satisfy this POC via the eviction of R2 due to the fire clearance violation mentioned above. Licensee will submit proof of corrections no later than POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87211(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 13, 2025
87211 Reporting Requirements (a) Each licensee shall furnish to the licensing agency... (1) A written report shall be submitted to the licensing agency... within seven days of the occurrence... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on file review and interview the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above as incident reports for R1's hospitalization and R2's change of condition were not submitted to CCLD which poses a potential health, safety, or personal rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 30, 2025
Plan of correction: Administrator submitted R1's incident report at the time of the visit. Licensee will submit an incident report for R2 and will submit a statement of understanding confirming that they understand the importance of submitting reports in a timely manner. Licensee will submit these items no later than POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87463(b) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 13, 2025
87463 Reappraisals (b) The reappraisal shall document significant changes in the resident's physical, mental, cognitive, behavioral, or functional condition... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on file review and observation the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above as R2 had a change of condition that was not reflected on their physician report which poses a potential health and safety risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 30, 2025
Plan of correction: The Licensee will obtain an updated physician report for R2. The Licensee may also satisfy this POC via the eviction of R2 due to the fire clearance violation. Licensee will submit proof of corrections no later than POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 13, 2025
87303 Maintenance and Operation (a) The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above as the flooring in the kitchen near the exit, the closet door in room # 2, and the light switch cover in the shared resident bathroom were in disrepair which poses a potential health and safety risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 30, 2025
Plan of correction: Licensee will submit proof of completed repairs for the identified items. Licensee will submit proof no later than POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87465(h)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 13, 2025
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (h) The following... shall apply... (6) The licensee shall be responsible for assuring that a record of centrally stored prescription medications for each resident is maintained... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as one medication prescribed to R1 was not logged on R1's CSMDR which poses a potential health risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 30, 2025
Plan of correction: The Administrator agreed to conduct a medication audit and submit an accurate CSMDR for R1 to CCLD no later than POC due date.
Feb 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual visit at 09:03 AM. LPA met with facility staff member Emma Elazyan (S1) who contacted the facility administrator Emma Avetisyan. The Administrator informed LPA that they were unable to come to the facility at the time of the visit. Entrance interview conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. Beginning at 09:10 AM, the LPA, along with S1 toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and that facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. The following was observed: KITCHEN: The LPA observed the kitchen area to be clean. Kitchen appliances appeared to be in operable condition. The facility has a sufficient supply of two (2) days perishable and seven (7) days non-perishable food. LPA observed a secured cabinet to contain knives and other sharp objects. LPA observed a secured cabinet to contain resident medications and a first aid kit. One (1) additional secured cabinet was observed to contain facility files. LPA observed a cabinet to contain adequate emergency food supplies. LPA observed a fire extinguisher mounted in the kitchen to be fully charged and purchased on 02/26/2024. COMMON AREAS: This includes the living room, hallway, and dining area. The living room was observed to be clean and in good repair. The living room contained adequate seating for resident use. LPA observed the living room to contain a television and activities for resident use. LPA observed the dining area to be clean and properly furnished at the time of the visit. The dining area contains a dining table with adequate seating for resident use. LPA observed a hallway closet to contain extra linens. The facility’s fire and carbon monoxide alarms were tested at 09:47 AM. At 09:48 AM LPA observed the facility’s carbon monoxide alarm to be non-functional. All exits in the facility were observed to contain functioning auditory alarms. Continued on LIC 809C. BEDROOMS: There are four (4) bedrooms in the facility; two (2) are a dual occupancy rooms and two (2) are single occupancy rooms. LPA and S1 toured all four (4) bedrooms. All resident rooms were observed to be furnished appropriately with clean linens, appropriate furnishings, and sufficient lighting. Bedroom #2’s window was observed to be missing a window screen. Bedroom #1’s window screen was observed to be seated improperly in the frame which left an opening in the corner of the frame. BATHROOMS: There are two (2) bathrooms at the facility. One (1) bathroom is designated as private resident bathroom, and one (1) bathroom is designated as a shared resident bathroom. Both resident bathrooms were observed to be clean and in good repair and were equipped with nonskid surfaces. Grab bars were observed in all resident showers and near all resident toilets, all were properly secured. The water temperature was measured between 138.2 and 140.4 degrees Fahrenheit, which outside of the range required by regulation. The private resident’s bathroom window screen was observed to be seated improperly in the frame which left an opening in the corner of the frame. OUTDOOR SPACE: The facility has two (2) emergency exit gates. One (1) is located in the front yard and one (1) is located in the backyard; LPA observed clear passageways for emergency exit use. The facility has adequate shaded seating outdoors for resident use. LPA observed the facility’s backyard to contain two (2) additional refrigerators containing extra food items. RECORD REVIEW: Record review began at 10:00 AM. Staff and resident records were reviewed for documents including, but not limited to: health screening, TB test, staff training records, fingerprint clearance, resident physician's report, needs and service appraisal, consent forms, and personal rights. Four (4) staff files were reviewed. One (1) staff file was observed to be missing the required LIC 508 Out-of-state disclosure sheet. One (1) staff file was observed to be missing the LIC 503 Health screening report – facility personnel and a negative TB test. Six (6) resident files were reviewed. One (1) resident file was observed to be missing a negative Tuberculosis (TB) test. MEDICATION REVIEW: Medication review began at 11:45 AM. Medications for six (6) of six (6) residents were observed. All medications were stored properly and were appropriately documented on their respective centrally stored medication and destruction record sheets. Continued on LIC 809C. INFECTION CONTROL/EMERGENCY DISASTER PLANNING: During today’s visit, the LPA reviewed the facility's infection control practices and the facility's emergency disaster plan. The facility’s policies and procedures as it pertains to infection control are adequate. Emergency disaster drills are conducted quarterly; the facility’s last emergency disaster drill was conducted on 01/14/2025. The facility’s emergency disaster plan is adequate. The emergency disaster plan was last reviewed/updated by the Administrator on 06/22/2021 which is outside of the required annual timeframe. The infection control plan is reviewed/updated annually by the facility’s administrator. INTERVIEWS: LPA interviewed two (2) residents. The residents interviewed stated that the staff treat them well and are attentive to their needs. Both residents had no concerns with the facility. One (1) staff interview was conducted. The staff member interviewed was knowledgeable on the resident’s rights, the forms of abuse, and the appropriate reporting procedures for suspected abuse. During today’s visit LPA obtained a copy of the facility’s LIC 500 and resident roster. The facility was unable to provide a copy of valid liability insurance at the time of the inspection. The facility Administrator was unable to come to the facility to sign this report but has designated S1 to sign on their behalf. This report was read to the Administrator via telephone call. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 20, 2025
The state marks this report as 8 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 7. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
20242 state visits · 2 documents
Mar 5, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - Annual ContinuationReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Annual Continuation
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived unannounced to conduct an annual inspection- continuation visit. The LPA was greeted by staff. Staff contacted the Administrator by phone. The LPA communicated with the administrator via phone, and informed them of the visit. RECORDS: At 12:16 p.m. the Personnel records were reviewed for, but not limited to health assessments, criminal record clearances, first aid/CPR training, and the appropriate training. Records were in order. MEDICATIONS: Medications review began at 2:10 p.m.; medications are centrally stored and locked in a cabinet in the kitchen area; medications are labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications are properly documented on the centrally stored medications and destruction record. No errors observed during the medication review. INFECTION CONTROL: The facility has an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. The LPA reviewed the following documents: - LIC500 Personnel Report Facility staff representative signed today's report. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 5, 2024
Feb 28, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a required annual inspection. LPA Urena was greeted by staff and explained the reason for the visit. Staff called administrator Emma Avetisyan on the phone, and the LPA explained the reason for the visit. LPA communicated with Administrator via cell phone. LPA Urena and staff conducted a tour of the inside and outside the facility to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. COMMON AREAS: At the time of the visit, living room and dining room furniture was observed to be in good condition. The facility maintained a comfortable temperature of 70 degrees. The LPA observed required postings throughout the common space. KITCHEN: Knives are stored in a locked cabinet drawer. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has enough supply of perishable and non-perishable food. The freezer and refrigerator are stocked with a variety of foods. The emergency food supply is adequate for six residents and two staff. The laundry room is equipped with a functioning washer and dryer. The room was locked at the time of inspection. One fire extinguishers were fully charged and were last serviced/purchased on 02/26/2024 BEDROOMS: Bedrooms were furnished appropriately with appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Bedroom #1 had one bed without linens or blankets. The other linens are clean and in good condition. Extra linens are found stored in the linen closet located between bedrooms #1 and #2. Continues on LIC 9099C... BATHROOMS: Bathroom was clean, shower area was in clean condition with grab bars, and a non-skid mat available. Hand washing sign was displayed, and sufficient amounts of soap and paper products in the bathroom. OUTDOOR AREA: Backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with outdoor furniture for residents’ use. There were no bodies of water noted. The side gate is unlocked. The gate has an alarm system. Several items(empty food plastic canisters, plastic bags, monitor, non-operational refrigerator, and metal long pieces were observed, which need to be removed from the seating outdoor/backyard area. RECORDS: Records review began at 11:00 a.m., Residents’ records were reviewed for, but not limited to care plans, medical records, admissions agreement, consent forms. Five out of six residents' physicians reports(LIC 602) TB Test section 6. was incomplete and did not have date test give, read, type of TB test. Six out of six Personal Property and Valuables form(LIC 621) first page was not filled out. Five out of six residents' records were missing residents' or/residents' representative signatures on different required forms: Admission Agreements, Personal Rights, etc. Two out of six residents files did not have physician's orders for hospice/home health care. The LPA reviewed the following documents: - LIC9020 Client Roster - Liability Insurance Due to time constraints, the LPA will conduct a continuation inspection at a later date. Facility staff representative signed today's report. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 28, 2024
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 8 documents
20232 state visits · 4 documents
Apr 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff abused residents in care
Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Sandra Urena conducted a subsequent unannounced visit to deliver the findings for the allegation above. The LPA arrived at 6:10 p.m., and was greeted by staff. The staff contacted the Administrator Emma Avetisyan via phone, and the LPA explained the reason for the visit. Administrator was not able to come to the facility. On 03/22/2023, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an initial unannounced visit to investigate the allegation above. The LPA arrived at 1:51 p.m., and was greeted by staff. The staff contacted the Administrator Emma Avetisyan via phone, and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator was unable to come to the facility. LPA Urena interviewed the Administrator and staff from to 2:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. LPA Urena attempted to interview the residents. Continues on LIC9099C... Substantiated On the allegation that ‘Staff abused residents in care’; it is the complainant’s concern that the residents are being abused possibly physically, due to complainant hearing screams from a resident, possibly being hit, while screaming and banging was also heard. To investigate the complaint, on 03/22/2023, the LPA conducted collateral interviews about the incident witnessed by the public. The interviews revealed that staff #1(S1) was observed forcefully pulling R1, and trying to pull R1 into the facility’s front yard. Both, S1 and R1 were observed outside the perimeter fence of the facility, where R1 was holding on to one of the pillars of the fence, and S1 was observed pulling R1 aggressively. Additionally, it was observed that S1 pulled R1 into the front yard, and R1 fell to the ground, causing R1’s pants to fall half-way down. S1 was eventually able to pull R1 back inside the facility. The LPA interviewed the Administrator, and the interview revealed that the Administrator was informed by S1 about the incident of R1 attempts to elope the facility. Per the administrator, R1 eloped the facility through the side gate, and when the S1 noticed that R1 had exited the front gate, S1 attempted to bring back R1 into the facility. The Administrator stated that R1 fell while attempting to elope. Based on the information obtained through interviews, there is sufficient evidence to support the allegation that staff violated R1’s personal rights by forcefully restraining R1 to prevent R1 from eloping from the facility, causing the fall and potential bruising on R1. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. The following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 9099-D.) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Citations were issued. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator on the phone, and the facility representative signed the report. A copy of the report and Appeal Rights were issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 6, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230316082259
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87705(a)(k)(4)(5)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 14, 2023
(4)Without violating ... Personal Rights, facility staff shall attempt to redirect a resident who attempts to leave the facility.(5)Residents who continue to indicate a desire to leave the facility following redirection shall be permitted to do so with staff supervision. Personal Rights, facility ... the continued safety of residents if they wander... facility. This requirement was not met as evidence by: Based on interviews, the licensee did not comply, R1 was able forcefully restrained while trying to leave the facility, which poses a potential safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 6, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator agrees to review the regulations with staff as they pertain to caring to persons with dementia. Submit staff training sig in sheet, training agenda and materials/handouts used for training by 04/14/2023.
Apr 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident's hygiene needs are not being met.
Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Sandra Urena conducted a subsequent unannounced visit to deliver the findings for the allegation above. The LPA arrived at 6:10 p.m., and was greeted by staff. The staff contacted the Administrator Emma Avetisyan via phone, and the LPA explained the reason for the visit. Administrator was not able to come to the facility. On 03/22/2023, Licensing Program Analyst(LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an initial unannounced visit to investigate the allegation above. The LPA and the staff conducted a brief tour of the physical plant. Walls of bedrooms, beds, linens and common areas, bathroom, and hallway areas were observed to be clean, and in good condition. LPA Urena interviewed the Administrator from 2:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. The LPA conducted pertinent file review at 2:30 p.m. Continues on LIC9099C... Unsubstantiated On the allegation that ‘Resident's hygiene needs are not being met; it is the complainant’s concern that the residents’ hygiene needs are not being address, due to R1 had dry feces in fingernails, and dried blood (on walls). It was further noted that there was blood on walls, and fecal matter on bed linens. To investigate the complaint the LPA conducted a brief tour of the facility, and on this day all common areas were observed to be in clean condition, bed linens were observed to be clean, and in good condition. The Administrator's interview revealed that R1 had been combative when it came to their hygiene; refusing to allow S1 to clip their nails, and keeping them clean. The Administrator added that on 03/17/2023, R1 attempted to elope the facility, and that R1 fell on the front yard while trying to elope. According to the Administrator, R1 fell on the front yard, and got scrapes on hands, which and may be the cause for the dry blood. The complainant’s report stated that recently R1 had become increasingly difficult to control. On 03/21/2023 at approximately 4:20 p.m., the LPA interviewed R1’s longtime friend (F1), who stated that the last time F1 saw R1 at the facility, it was in mid-February 2023. F1 observed the facility, and R1 to be ‘immaculate clean’, and did not see any signs of neglect. Based on the information obtained through observation, and interviews, there is not sufficient evidence to support the allegation that the Resident’s hygiene needs are not met. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No citations were issued. Exit interview was conducted with Administrator over the phone, and signed by the facility representative. A copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 6, 2023 · control 29-AS-20230320163750
Feb 3, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is placing residents on hospice that do not qualify. Medications are not administered daily.
On 02/03/2023, Licensing program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena, arrived unannounced for a subsequent complaint inspection for the allegations listed above. LPA Urena met with staff , and explained the reason for the visit. Staff called administrator Emma Avetisyan on the phone, and the LPA explained the reason for the visit. Ms. Avetisyan instructed staff Emma Elazyan to give the LPA tour of the facility, and to sign the report. On 12/08/2022, Licensing program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena, arrived unannounced for an initial complaint inspection for the above allegations. The LPA met spoke with facility staff, and staff contacted the Administrator. The LPA spoke with the Administrator on the phone, and explained the reason for the visit. At 2:00 p.m., LPA Urena and the facility staff conducted a brief physical plant tour, interviewed administrator at 2:30 p.m. The LPA obtained documents for review pertinent to the investigation at 2:26 p.m. The LPA found that further investigation is needed before delivering the findings. Continues on LIC 9099C... Unsubstantiated On the allegation of ‘Facility is placing residents on hospice that do not qualify’, the complainant's concern is that residents that do not qualify for hospice services, are being served by a hospice agency. To investigate the allegation, LPA Urena conducted five (5) residents’ record review. The record review revealed that five out of five residents are not receiving hospice services. LPA Urena interviewed the Administrator, and the interview revealed that five out of the five residents are not receiving hospice services. Based on the information obtained through record review, and interviews, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that facility is placing residents on hospice that do not qualify. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. On the allegation of ‘Medications are not administered daily’, the RP’s concern is that the medication is not being administered as prescribed. To investigate the allegation, LPA Urena conducted medication record review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the medication containers. The record review of five out of five residents revealed that five out of five residents are being assisted with medication as prescribed by their physician. The MAR review was current as 02/03/2023. LPA Urena interviewed the staff, and the staff showed the LPA the medications for each resident, and how they assist residents with their medication. Based on the information obtained through record review, and interviews, there is insufficient evidence to support the allegation that medications are not being administered daily. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. No deficiencies cited. Exit interview conducted, and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2023 · control 29-AS-20221201105520
Feb 3, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 02/03/2023, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena, arrived at the facility at 10:12 a.m., unannounced to conduct a required annual inspection. This annual inspection had a specific emphasis on infection control practices and procedures. LPA Urena met with staff , and explained the reason for the visit. Staff called administrator Emma Avetisyan on the phone, and the LPA explained the reason for the visit. Ms. Avetisyan instructed staff Emma Elazyan to give the LPA tour of the facility, and to sign the inspection report. Infection Control: Upon entry, the facility had a central entry point for symptom screening, temperature checks, and sanitation station. The LPA observed an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. At 10:25 a.m., LPA Urena and staff conducted a tour of the inside and outside the facility to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Common Areas: The walls and flooring were observed to be clean and in good condition. At the time of the visit, common seating area, and dining room furniture was observed to be clean and in good condition. During the tour, it was observed that the signal system for the front door was broken. a Continues on LIC809C ... Kitchen: Knives are stored in a locked cabinet drawer. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has enough supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Freezer and refrigerator are stocked with a variety of foods. Emergency food supply is adequate for six residents and two staff. The laundry room is equipped with a functioning washer and dryer. The room was locked at the time of inspection. During of the pantry inspection, at 10:36 a.m. the LPA observed found several cans of food to have expired on 2021 and 2022. Fire extinguisher is found in the kitchen area, at 11:15 a.m. the LPA observed that the fire extinguisher had expired as 02/26/2021. Bedrooms: Bedrooms were furnished appropriately with appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Linens are clean and in good condition. Extra linens are found stored in the linen closet located between bedrooms #1 and #2. Bathrooms: Restroom was clean, shower area was in clean condition with grab bars, and a non-skid mat available. Paper towels were available for drying hands. Hand washing sign was displayed, and sufficient amounts of soap and paper products in the bathroom. Outdoor Space: Backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with outdoor furniture for residents’ use. There were no bodies of water noted. Side gate is unlocked, however at 11:47 a.m. the LPA observed that the gate had a piece of wood placed against the wood gate to prevent a resident from exiting the premises. The gate has an alarm system, however the system is broken. Toxic materials(Charcoal Fluid) was found outside on the barbecue grill( bottom part) within reach to residents. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D). Deficiencies were cited during this visit. Exit interview was conducted. The report was reviewed with licensee representative, signatures were obtained, and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 3, 2023
20221 state visit · 1 document
Mar 11, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
On 03/11/2022, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena, arrived at the facility at 1:00 p.m., unannounced to conduct a required annual inspection. This annual inspection had a specific emphasis on infection control practices and procedures. LPA Urena met with staff Narine Sargsyan, and explained the reason for the visit. Staff called administrator Emma Avetisyan on the phone, and the LPA explained the reason for the visit. Ms. Avetisyan instructed staff Narine Sargsyan to give the LPA tour of the facility and to sign the inspection report. Infection Control: Upon entry, the facility had a central entry point for symptom screening, temperature checks, and sanitation station. The LPA observed an adequate supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) and the facility is able to obtain additional supplies as needed. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. If needed, the facility has the capacity to designate a single isolation room if the facility has a confirmed case of COVID-19. At 1:25 p.m., LPA Urena and staff conducted a tour of the inside and outside the facility to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Common Areas: At 1:45 p.m., LPA Urena observed the walls and flooring to be clean and in good condition. At the time of the visit, common seating area, and dining room furniture was observed to be clean and in good condition. Fire extinguishers were observed to be serviced within the last year. Continues on LIC809C ... Kitchen: At 1:55 p.m., LPA Urena observed the kitchen/dining area. Knives are stored in a locked cabinet drawer. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has enough supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Freezer and refrigerator are stocked with a variety of foods. Emergency food supply is adequate for six residents and two staff. The laundry room is equipped with a functioning washer and dryer. Toxic materials are stored in a cabinet in the laundry room. The room was locked at the time of inspection. Bedrooms: At 2:10 p.m., LPA Urena observed four residents’ bedrooms. Bedrooms were furnished appropriately with appropriate furnishings and sufficient lighting. Linens are clean and in good condition. Extra linens are found stored in the laundry room. Bathrooms: At 2:20 p.m., LPA Urena observed the residents’ restroom. Restroom was clean, shower area was in clean condition with grab bars, and a non-skid mat available. Paper towels were available for drying hands. Hand washing sign was displayed, and sufficient amounts of soap and paper products in the bathroom. Outdoor Space: At 2:40 p.m., LPA Urena observed the outdoor space. Backyard has a covered outdoor area equipped with outdoor furniture for residents’ use. There were no bodies of water noted. Side gate is unlocked. No deficiencies cited during this visit. Exit interview was conducted. The report was reviewed with licensee representative Narine Sargsyan, signatures were obtained, and a copy of the report was provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 11, 2022
20213 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 26, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff gave medication to residents without a physician's prescription order.
On 10/26/2021, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced initial 10-day complaint investigation visit regarding the above allegations. LPA Urena was greeted by the Caregiver at 3:30 pm. The Administrator, Emma Avestisyan was unavailable at the time; the caregiver contacted the administrator on the phone. The LPA spoke with the Administrator over the phone and informed them of the reason for the visit. It is alleged that staff give sleeping medication to residents without a prescription. At 3:40pm, the LPA asked S1 for the residents’ files and medication logs for the four residents at the facility. The LPA reviewed the residents’ files, medication logs, and found that two out of the four residents have a doctor’s prescription for sleeping pills. The LPA audited medications during today’s visit. The LPA observed that R1 had a prescription for 5MG of Donepezil, and R2 had a prescription for 10MG of Donepezil. Continues on LIC 9099C ... Unsubstantiated The LPA asked the S1 to conduct a count of the pills in each of the bottles for R1, and R2. According to the prescription date on the bottle, number of pills prescribed, and pills remaining in the bottles, the medication is being administered as prescribed by physicians. At 4:05 pm, LPA Urena and S1 conducted a tour of the facility, inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards, and the facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition, knives were locked and out of reach of residents. Bathrooms had paper towels and hand washing signs. Shower had a nonskid pad. Bedrooms had adequate furniture, bedding linens, light, and personal space for each resident. During the tour of the facility, the LPA observed residents walking about the facility, from the bedroom to the common area, and to the bathroom. At 4:15pm, LPA Urena interviewed administrator over the phone. At 4:20pm the LPA interviewed staff and residents. Residents stated that they watch TV during the day. S1 stated that the sleeping medication is administered after dinner. Dinner is between 7:00pm to 7:30pm and medication is administered to the two residents at around 8:00pm. Based on the information obtained, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that staff gave medication to residents without a physician's prescription order. This allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted. Report was read to Administrator over the phone. Administrator Emma Avetisyan allowed S1 to sign the report. The report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2021 · control 29-AS-20211022113023
Sep 8, 2021Facility evaluation reportPOCDeficiency page: Type B
Type of visit: POC
At 1:45 pm, Licensing Program Analyst Sandra Urena conducted an unannounced Plan of Correction visit. The LPA spoke with Administrator Emma Avetisyan and explained the reason for the visit. At 2:15 pm, the LPA conducted a complete a file review (see LIC 858) for the four residents residing at the facility. Upon review of residents' files, it was observed that three out of four residents’ files are missing a TB test date, and results were lacking evidence of a TB exam, or date of exam or type of test. Therefore, based on records reviewed the following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 809-D) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Exit interview conducted. Signatures obtained. A copy of the report and appeal rights were provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 8, 2021
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87458(b)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Sep 20, 2021
87458(b)(1) Medical AssessmentThe medical assessment, at a minimum, shall include: A physical exam of the resident containing a primary and secondary diagnosis, if any, results of a test for tuberculosis and any medical conditions which would preclude care of the person in an RCFE.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 8, 2021
Plan of correction: Licensee agreed to have a TB test result from the Physician office by POC date. Licensee agrees to submit a written plan of correction outlining how the Licensee will prevent this from occurring in the future
Sep 3, 2021Facility evaluation reportPost LicensingReport on file
Type of visit: Post Licensing
Licensing Program Analyst, Sandra Urena conducted an announced Post Licensing Visit, and an Infection Control Inspection. LPA Urena arrived at the facility at 10:45am, met with Licensee Armine Grigoryan, and explained the reason for the visit. At 12:00 pm, the LPA toured the physical plant areas inside and outside to ensure there are no health and safety hazards and facility is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. INFECTION CONTROL: Upon entry, the facility has a sign in book and sanitizing gel. Infection Control signage was visible at entrance. LPA observed that the supply of Personal Protection Equipment (PPE) was limited and not fully available. The facility’s cleaning protocol is sufficient. Bedrooms: At 12:15pm, the LPA observed the residents’ bedrooms have clean bed linens and were in clean condition There is at least one chair, nightstand and sufficient lighting for each resident. Bathroom: At 12:30pm, the LPA observed the bathroom, it had a tub and enclosed shower doors. The tub had grab bars, and a nonskid mat. It was in a clean condition. Paper towels were not available for hand drying. Kitchen: At 12:35 pm, LPA observed the kitchen/dining area. Knives are stored in a locked pantry. Kitchen appliances were in operable condition. The facility has enough supply of perishable and non-perishable food. Freezer and refrigerator are stocked with a variety of foods. Freezer had a limited supply meat, the supply appeared to be only for two days. Emergency food supply was not available. Emergency water supply consisted of one- 24 cas bottled water, and two gallons of water. Outdoor Area: At 12:45 pm, LPA observed the Outdoor space. A shaded patio is available for residents to visit with family members. Side gate is unlocked. Medications: At 1:00pm the LPA observed that medications are in a centrally stored and locked place, including over-the-counter medicines; medications are properly labeled and checked for expiration dates. Medications were available for three of the four residents residing in the facility. Medication dispensing logs were not available at facility. Licensee stated that Medication Logs were removed by administrator. Record Review: Resident records: At 1:30pm, LPA Urena reviewed residents’ files for current Needs and Service plans, admission agreements, Consent forms, Safeguard for Personal Property/Valuables, TB, Personal rights. Three out of four residents’ files were not available at the facility. The only file available for review had all required documents available, but had an Appraisal/ Needs and Services Plan (1-4 pages) signed by resident, however pages two and three of the appraisals were blank. Licensee stated files were stored with the administrator. Files were not stored locally at facility. Staff records: At 1:45 pm, the LPA conducted a file review of staff for criminal record clearances/associations/and current First Aid. All files had the required documentation. A personnel LIS search revealed six individuals associated to the facility. Two of the associated individuals were present at the facility during today’s visit. Staff have not been fit tested for N-95 masks. The following deficiencies were observed (See LIC 809-D.) and cited from the California Code of Regulations, Title 22 and California Health and Safety Code. Failure to correct the deficiencies may result in civil penalties. Appeal rights were provided. Deficiencies were cited at this time. Exit interview conducted. Signatures obtained. A copy of the report was issuedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 3, 2021
The state marks this report as 12 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
6 of 6 beds were occupied at the April 9, 2026 state visit, the most recent — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Amy's Paradise Home of Angels Inc., licensed since 2021.
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2021, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 14
- Total complaints
- 6
- Substantiated allegations
- 4
- Type A citations
- 2
- Type B citations
- 2
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2021, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 2 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 2 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 4 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 6 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Amy's Paradise Home of Angels
Is Amy's Paradise Home of Angels licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Amy's Paradise Home of Angels licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Amy's Paradise Home of Angels been cited?
2 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 14 state visits over the same years.
Is Amy's Paradise Home of Angels still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.
What does Amy's Paradise Home of Angels cost?
$3,600 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $2,950–$4,450. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 11 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 232 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,151 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 232 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
Does Amy's Paradise Home of Angels take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Amy's Paradise Home of Angels Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Pacifica Hospital of the Valley is 1.3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Amy's Paradise Home of Angels keep a resident on hospice?
Not on file — the state’s record does not list hospice care on this license. Ask: “Can a resident stay here on hospice, and under what conditions?”
Amy's Paradise Home of Angels license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “AMY'S PARADISE HOME OF ANGELS INC.”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197609980. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Amy's Paradise Home of Angels Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 14 state inspection visits since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 2 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 14 state visits in that period.
- 6 complaints and 4 substantiated allegations on file since 2021, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is April 9, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,000 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,300–$4,950On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,000 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,250–$4,950On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,150 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,400–$5,150On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,250 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,450–$5,200On the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,100 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,350–$5,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,300 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,500–$5,300On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County