Illustration — no photo of this home on file yet

Troost Senior Care

Small home·Licensed for 6·North Hollywood, California

LicensedLicence #195850637
  • Care approvals on fileWheelchair · Dementia · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · September 13, 2026
  • Estimated starting rate$4,650 a monthCovelight estimate · likely $3,800–$5,700
  • Home sizeLicensed for 6Small care home · a licensed care home (RCFE)
  • Ways to payAsk the homeMedi-Cal ALW participation not on file
  • Last state visitAugust 11, 2026CDSS inspection record

Troost Senior Care is a small care home in North Hollywood — a licensed residential care facility for the elderly (RCFE), the licence category behind “assisted living” and “board and care.” It is licensed for 6 residents.

Built from CDSS public records · September 13, 2026. Every fact below names its source and date.

Quick answers and the state record

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Troost Senior Care

Is Troost Senior Care licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

How many residents is Troost Senior Care licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Has Troost Senior Care been cited?

0 Type A and 0 Type B citations, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is Troost Senior Care still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of September 28, 2026.

What does Troost Senior Care cost?

$4,650 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,800–$5,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 228 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,300 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 228 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date in September 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Troost Senior Care take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Troost Senior Care, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

Pacifica Hospital of the Valley is 1.7 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Troost Senior Care keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.

Troost Senior Care license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “TROOST SENIOR CARE”, per the CDSS roster as of June 12, 2026.
  • License #195850637. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • Licensed to Troost Senior Care, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • First licensed: the year is not on file — the roster carries no first-license date for it. Ask: “When did this license start?”
  • 4 state inspection visits on file, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 0 Type A and 0 Type B citations on file, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
  • 1 complaint and 0 substantiated allegations on file, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is August 11, 2026, per CDSS records as of September 13, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Can they support the care needed?

California licenses a home for specific kinds of care. The state’s record lists what this home is approved for; the home’s own answers fill in what changes as needs change.

  • Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • Dementia / memory careApproved by the state
  • Hospice careApproved · covers up to 6 residents
  • BedriddenApproved · covers up to 1 resident

State licensing record · September 13, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. APPROVED FOR 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN IN ROOM #2 OR #3. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR 6.

983 - RCFE / DEMENTIA

CDSS record, verbatim · September 13, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    Ask: “If hospice is needed, can care continue here until the end?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

  • If memory loss develops

    Dementia-care designation on file

    Ask: “Can we read the dementia care disclosure and discuss how daily support works?”

    State licensing record · September 13, 2026

3 more questions to ask the home
  • Two-person transfers or a lift

    Not on file

    Ask: “If two people or a lift are needed to transfer, can the person stay?”

  • Someone awake overnight

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?”

  • Medicines

    Not on file

    Ask: “Who manages the medicines, and what happens when a dose is missed?”

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$4,650a month to start

Likely $3,800–$5,700

From 14 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Likely monthly total

$4,650a month

Likely $3,800–$5,900

With a shared room and basic help.

An estimate for planning, not a quote. The price is made in the phone call.

See the full cost breakdownRoom, care and fees · how people pay · how this estimate works
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room
  • Starting monthly rate$4,650likely $3,800–$5,700

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (45 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,000one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,000 (134 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $3,800–$5,900
$4,650
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,450–$9,000
$6,650
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated September 23, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time community fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

  • What is the full monthly cost for the room and care we need, and what does it include?
  • What would the next care level cost, and who decides when it changes?
  • What is billed separately, and is there a one-time fee or deposit at move-in?
  • Is any private-pay period required before another payment program can begin?
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 14 small homes and similar homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

14 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,000–$6,350.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Show the 14 nearby homes behind this estimate

Where it is

  • 8051 Troost Ave, North Hollywood, CA 91605Address from the public record · September 13, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. Here are the dated documents and the state’s own words, beside what is typical for homes this size.

Since 2025, the state has filed 4 documents for this home, and its records count 4 visits. The most recent — a complaint investigation report on August 11, 2026 — closed with the state’s outcome word: “Unsubstantiated.”

On file since
2025
State visits
4
Most recent visit
August 11, 2026

We hold 1 complaint report the state published for this home, dated August 11, 2026. 1 of the 1 carries the state's recorded outcome word: “Unsubstantiated” (1). 1 includes the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word. Summary composed by computer from the 1 complaint report below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

Beside homes the same size

  • Type A citations0typical 0
  • Type B citations0typical 0
  • Substantiated allegations0typical 0
  • Total complaints1typical 0

“Typical” is the statewide median across the 6,808 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Year by year
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20262302025110

The last 36 months — 4 of 4 documents

20262 state visits · 3 documents
Aug 11, 2026Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Licensee housed residents in the garage Licensee did not provide adequate care and supervision, resulting in resident hospitalization Licensee abandoned resident

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a follow-up complaint visit at 10:58 AM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted the Administrator Erna Gevorgyan. Administrator arrived to the facility at 11:10 AM. Entrance interview was conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. On 06/09/2026 LPA Balisi conducted a physical plant tour, interviewed staff, and reviewed/obtained copies of pertinent documentation relevant to the investigation. On 06/18/2026 LPA Byrne conducted a physical plant tour, reviewed three (3) resident files, interviewed the Administrator, and collected copies of pertinent documentation. During today's visit LPA conducted a physical plant tour and delivered findings between approximately 11:11 AM and 11:45 AM. CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C. Unsubstantiated The allegations of “Licensee housed residents in the garage”, “Licensee abandoned resident”, and “Licensee did not provide adequate care and supervision, resulting in resident hospitalization” allege that the facility had illegally housed Individual #1 (I1) in the garage between May 2025-June 2026, that I1 had suffered a fall at the facility suffering a head injury, and that as a result of the injury facility staff abandoned I1 at an unlicensed location. LPA conducted a file review and observed the facility’s fire clearance to contain a comment which states, “Garage to be maintained as a garage only.” During the pre-licensing inspection which occurred on 11/03/2025 LPA conducted a physical plant tour and observed that the lot that the facility is on is split in half, North to South, by a fence with a gate. LPA observed the garage to be located on the back half of the property separated by the fence from the facility which is placed on the front half of the property. Although the facility sketch submitted with the application included the garage. LPA toured the garage and observed items including a bed and refrigerator which appeared to suggest that the garage was being utilized as a living area at the time of inspection. During the 11/03/2025 pre-licensing inspection LPA had a conversation with the Administrator and Applicant informing them of the facility’s fire clearance which stated that the garage was to be maintained as a garage. The Administrator and Applicant expressed understanding at the time and agreed to comply with the requirement. Records reflect the licensee is not the property owner. During the 06/18/2026 physical plant tour LPA observed ongoing construction taking place on the back half of the property. During the 06/18/2026 tour LPA did not observe signs which indicated that the garage was being inhabited. LPA interviewed the Administrator who denied having knowledge of I1 living in the garage on the property. The Administrator stated that after the pre-licensing inspection the facility did not have access to the back half of the property including the garage. The Administrator denied ever observing individuals accessing the back half of the property via the fence gate. The Administrator stated that on 01/30/2026 the property owner, hereby referred to as Witness #1 (W1), applied for a permit to split the property along the North to South fence line and to construct an ADU on the back half of the property. The Administrator stated that they were informed by W1 that the garage was being utilized to store items that were left over from when the facility was being operated as an Independent Living home prior to the licensure of the facility. The Administrator stated that they knew I1 had lived at the home while it was being operated as an Independent Living home but have never interacted with I1. CONTINUED ON LIC 9099C. The Administrator denied I1 ever being admitted as a resident of the facility and denied having any knowledge of I1 residing in the garage while the facility was licensed. LPA interviewed W1 who stated that they used to operate the home where the facility is located as an Independent Living home prior to the Licensee leasing the home and opening a licensed facility. W1 confirmed that I1 was a tenant at the Independent Living home and was under the care of W1. W1 confirmed that I1 resided in the garage while the licensed facility was in operation but denied the licensed facility having any involvement with I1 or the back half of the property. W1 stated that the garage was never part of the lease that the facility signed for the home and that anything going on with I1 or the garage “was my (W1’s) business.” LPA reviewed the lease agreement signed by the facility Licensee and W1 and observed that the lease indicated the tenant leased the premises at 8051 Troost Ave North Hollywood, CA 91605. LPA did not observe any indication that the tenant did not have access to the back half of the property or the garage indicated in the lease agreement. LPA reviewed resident files located at the facility. LPA did not observe any current or past file completed for I1. The Administrator confirmed that I1 was never admitted as a resident of the facility and at no time was I1 under the care of the licensed facility. Although the allegations may have happened or are valid there is insufficient evidence to support the allegations of, “Licensee housed residents in the garage”, “Licensee abandoned resident”, and “Licensee did not provide adequate care and supervision, resulting in resident hospitalization.” Therefore, the allegations are deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2026 · control 29-AS-20260608160524
Aug 11, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a case management - deficiencies visit at 10:58 AM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted the Administrator Erna Gevorgyan. Administrator arrived to the facility at 11:10 AM. Entrance interview was conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. During today's visit LPA conducted a physical plant tour between approximately 11:11 AM and 11:45 AM. During a complaint investigation at the facility, it was revealed that an individual who was not a resident of the licensed facility had resided in the garage. LPA conducted a file review and observed the facility’s fire clearance to contain a comment which states, “Garage to be maintained as a garage only.” During the pre-licensing inspection which occurred on 11/03/2025 LPA conducted a physical plant tour and observed that the lot that the facility is on is split in half, North to South, by a fence with a gate. LPA observed the garage to be located on the back half of the property separated by the fence from the facility which is placed on the front half of the property. Although the facility sketch submitted with the application included the garage. LPA toured the garage and observed items including a bed and refrigerator which appeared to suggest that the garage was being utilized as a living area at the time of inspection. During the 11/03/2025 pre-licensing inspection LPA had a conversation with the Administrator and Applicant informing them of the facility’s fire clearance which stated that the garage was to be maintained as a garage. The Administrator and Applicant expressed understanding at the time and agreed to comply with the requirement. LPA interviewed the property owner for the address where the facility is located who is hereby referred to as Witness #1 (W1). CONTINUED ON LIC 809C. W1 stated that they used to operate the home where the facility is located as an Independent Living home prior to the Licensee leasing the home and opening a licensed facility. W1 confirmed that an individual resided in the garage while the licensed facility was in operation but denied the licensed facility having any involvement with the individual or the back half of the property. W1 stated that the garage was never part of the lease that the facility signed for the home and that anything going on with the garage or the individual who was residing in the garage “was my (W1’s) business.” LPA reviewed the lease agreement signed by the facility Licensee and W1 and observed that the lease indicated that the tenant leased the premises at 8051 Troost Ave. North Hollywood, CA 91605. LPA did not observe any indication that the tenant did not have access to the back half of the property or the garage indicated in the lease agreement. The Administrator informed LPA that on 01/30/2026 W1 applied for a permit to split the property along the North to South fence line and to construct an ADU on the back half of the property. LPA informed the Administrator that since individual had resided in the garage between approximately May 2025-June 2026 the individual resided in the unapproved garage which was under the facility’s lease between the date the facility was licensed (11/12/2025) until the property owner split the property (01/30/2026). LPA informed the Administrator that even though the individual was not a resident of the facility the garage was not being maintained as a garage which constituted a violation of the facility’s fire clearance. LPA informed the Administrator that this is a zero-tolerance violation and a civil penalty in the amount of $500 is being assessed on today’s date (08/11/2026). LPA informed the Administrator that the facility will need submit a new facility sketch and to request a new fire inspection/clearance to indicate that the garage is no longer part of the facility. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations the following deficiency was cited and civil penalty assessed (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87202(a) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 26, 2026

87202 Fire Clearance (a) All facilities shall maintain a fire clearance approved by the city, county, or city and county fire department, or district providing fire protection services, or the State Fire Marshal. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews and record review the Licensee did not comply with the section cited above as I1 was housed in the facility garage while it was under the control of the facility and not approved for habitation which posed an immediate health and safety risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 11, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to obtain a new fire clearance which does not include the garage as it is no longer part of the facility. Additionally, Administrator agreed to submit a new facility sketch which reflects that the garage is not part of the facility. Administrator agreed to submit the sketch and to... either complete the fire inspection or to submit proof that the inspection has been scheduled to CCLD no later than POC due date.

Jun 18, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analysts (LPA) Trevor Byrne arrived at the facility unannounced to conduct a case management - deficiencies visit at 03:06 PM. LPA met with facility staff who contacted the Administrator Erna Gevorgyan. Administrator arrived to the facility at 03:10 PM. Entrance interview was conducted and the reason for the visit was explained. During today's visit LPA conducted a physical plant tour, reviewed three (3) resident files, interviewed the Administrator, and collected copies of pertinent documentation. On 06/09/2026 Community Care Licensing Division (CCLD) received a notice from the Administrator that the facility had admitted Resident #1 (R1) to the facility. The Administrator informed CCLD that R1 had a prohibited health condition and did not qualify for enrollment with hospice. LPA informed the Administrator that persons with a prohibited health condition listed in regulations shall not be admitted or retained in a residential care facility for the elderly. The Administrator submitted the required documentation to process an exception request to retain this resident on 06/16/2026. During the physical plant tour LPA observed two (2) resident beds which contained full bed rails. LPA interviewed the Administrator who confirmed that neither resident was enrolled with a hospice company. LPA notified the Administrator that Bed rails that extend the entire length of the bed are prohibited except for residents who are currently receiving hospice care and have a hospice care plan that specifies the need for full bed rails. Pursuant to Title 22 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 809-D): Exit interview conducted and copy of the report was issued and appeal rights provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2026

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87615(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Jun 19, 2026

87615 Prohibited Health Conditions (a) Persons who... have a health condition including...shall not be admitted or retained in a residential care facility for the elderly: (2) Gastrostomy tubes. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as one resident was admitted to the facility with a prohibited health condition that was not being cared for by a hospice company which poses an immediate health risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator agreed to submit statement of understanding confirming that they will not accept any future residents to the facility with prohibited health conditions without hospice involvement or a prior approved exception. Administrator agreed to submit the statement to CCLD no later than POC due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR87608(a)(5)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 2, 2026

87608 Postural Supports (a) Postural supports may be used under the following conditions. (5) ... (B) Bed rails that extend the entire length of the bed are prohibited... This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on observation and interview the licensee did not comply with the section cited above as two resident beds contained full bed rails and the residents were not enrolled with a hospice company which poses a potential personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 18, 2026

Plan of correction: Administrator removed the bed rails at the time of the visit. POC cleared.

20251 state visit · 1 document
Nov 3, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Type of visit: Prelicensing

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Trevor Byrne conducted a pre-licensing visit to the above noted facility. The LPA met with Administrator Erna Gevorgyan and Applicant Representative Kazar Mkrtchian. This is a new facility. A dementia program was included in the plan of operation. A Hospice Waiver has been requested. The facility is a one story home. At 10:01 AM, a physical plant tour was conducted inside and out. An approved fire clearance was received, clearing them for five (5) non-ambulatory residents and, one (1) bedridden resident. The facility has three (3) shared rooms, Rooms # 1, 2, and 3. Rooms two (2) and three (3) have direct exits to the outside and are the bedridden approved rooms. All resident rooms are set up with beds, nightstands, lamps, chests of drawers, chairs and closet space. The beds are furnished with box springs, comfortable mattress and clean linen; which includes, a mattress pad, top and bottom linens, pillowcases, blanket if needed and a bedspread. Lighting in the rooms appeared adequate. Bedrooms # one (1) and three (3) were large enough to allow for easy passage between the beds and furniture with a wheelchair or walker. Bedroom #2 was observed to contain two (2) resident beds which did not allow for easy passage between the beds and furniture with a wheelchair or walker. During the visit one (1) bed was removed from the room to allow for enough space for easy passage. LPA informed the Administrator and Applicant Representative that alternate furniture arrangements must be made if a second bed is added to bedroom #2 to ensure exits and passageways remain clear from obstruction. The Applicant Representative and Administrator expressed understanding. In addition, no bedroom was used as a passageway to another room, bath or toilet. There are no staff rooms awake night staff are required. All rooms were free of odors. All window screens were clean and maintained in good repair. Continued on LIC 809C. There are two (2) bathrooms in the hallway. The resident bathrooms have a shower with non-skid materials. The toilet and shower have grab bars. The hot water temperature was tested in the bathrooms and the kitchen and was found to be within the range of 105*F and 120*F. Resident and staff records are stored in a locked cabinet which is currently located in the hallway. Medications are centrally stored in a locked cabinet in the kitchen. The first aid supplies were complete, including a thermometer. A current version of a first aid manual was ordered and was expected to be delivered 11/04/2025. They were stored on the counter in the kitchen. Kitchen knives are stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Stove burners are rendered inaccessible to the residents by removing them when not in use. The supply of dishes, utensils, pots, pans and drinkware is adequate. The freezer was maintained at zero degrees Fahrenheit (0*F) and the refrigerator was maintained at 40*F. The supply of nonperishable food is adequate. There are no pesticides, poisons, or toxins stored in any food storage area or preparation area with utensils. Appliances in the kitchen were clean and all appeared functional. Kitchen, laundry and house cleaning supplies are stored in locked cabinets located in the laundry room and facility hallway. No flies or other vermin were observed. The common areas were appropriately furnished, and the lighting was adequate. There was a television and other entertainment equipment, games and/or activity supplies in the living room and entryway. There was sufficient space to accommodate both indoor and outdoor activities. Night lights were maintained in hallways and passageways to nonprivate bathrooms. Stairways, inclines, ramps and open porches and areas of potential hazard to residents with poor balance or eyesight were made inaccessible to residents unless equipped with sturdy hand railings and unless well-lighted. All ramps were secure and non-slippery and were positioned at the level where wheelchairs and walkers may enter and exit the facility safely. There is an electric fireplace in the living room. It is screened and there are no tools. Alarms on all exterior doors were engaged at the time of visit and functional. In addition, the physical plant is consistent with the submitted facility sketch/floor plan. The facility had emergency lighting, which included flashlights and batteries. The facility has a furnace, which is able to heat rooms that residents occupy to a minimum of 68 degrees Fahrenheit; and, they have air conditioning and are able to cool rooms to a comfortable range, not to exceed 85 degrees Fahrenheit. Continued on LIC 809C. The facility smoke alarm system is hard wired. The smoke detector and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and functioned properly during the time of visit. There were two (2) fire extinguishers throughout the house. They were fully charged and did not exceed the expiration date. LPA observed a fire door of the facility to not be equipped with a magnetic catch. LPA informed the Administrator and Applicant representative that the fire door must remain closed when not in use and not propped open during operations. The Applicant representative and Administrator expressed understanding and agreed to comply. Hot water was tested in each bathroom, which included the resident bathrooms and the kitchen; and, the hot water ranged from 109.8 to 116.6 degrees Fahrenheit. The laundry area is located adjacent to the kitchen. The supply of extra bed and bath linens is adequate. Personal hygiene items, shampoos, and soaps were adequate and are stored in a locked cabinet in a shared resident bathroom. There is a functioning telephone on the premises. The emergency exiting plans/sketch are posted in each resident room and throughout the facility. The emergency telephone numbers are posted in the dining area. Other required postings are posted near the entryway of the facility. The exterior passageways were clean and clear of any obstructions. There is a shaded patio area at the front of the house with tables and chairs where residents can sit. The entire property is fenced. The back and garage of the house are separated from the front yard by a fence and gate. The gate to the driveway is moved automatically. There is a door w/gate with a self-latching mechanism for persons to enter the front yard. There are not any bodies of water on the premises at the present time. The garage is not accessible from the house. LPA had a conversation with the applicant representative and Administrator that the garage is to be used as a garage only. Both the applicant representative and Administrator expressed understanding. COMP III orientation was completed with the applicant during this pre-licensing inspection. The following item must be corrected prior to licensure. Submit proof of corrections, along with a copy of this report, to LPA Byrne so that your application may be completed. Continued on LIC 809C. This report will be sent to the Centralized Application Bureau (CAB) once all corrections are received. You will be notified by the CAB Analyst when your license has been approved. You are not allowed to begin operating until you have been notified that your license has been approved by the CAB Analyst. Failure to comply could affect approval of your license. 87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a) A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (8) If a facility has no medical unit on the grounds, a complete first aid kit shall be maintained and be readily available in a specific location in the facility. The kit shall be a general type approved by the American Red Cross, or shall contain at least the following: (A) A current edition of a first aid manual approved by the American Red Cross, the American Medical Association or a state or federal health agency.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 3, 2025
What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents and the questions below stand in their place.

Life here

Rooms, meals, the rhythm of a day, faith and language, pets and house rules — as the home describes them. Tap any detail for its source and date; nothing here is graded.

The home has not described daily life anywhere we have reviewed yet — that is the case for most small homes, and it says nothing about the home. These questions fill in the picture; keep the ones that matter to you.

Before you call

Ask every home the same questions — the state’s record does not answer these. Keep the ones that matter and they travel with your saved homes.

  1. What is included in the monthly rate, and what costs extra?
  2. Who is awake overnight, and how do residents ask for help?
  3. Which rooms does the non-ambulatory approval cover, and what transfer support is provided?
  4. What could change whether someone can stay here?
  5. Can we see a bedroom and share a meal during a visit?

Other homes nearby

The nearest licensed homes in Los Angeles County, closest first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

Explore Los Angeles County