Skip to main content
CovelightCare
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Saved homesGuided search
  • Start your search

    • MapExplore homes by area and what matters to you.
    • Directory
    • Guided search
    • Medi-Cal care homes

    Take a closer look

    • Check a home
    • Compare homes
    • Ask homes for me
  • Step by step

    • All care guidesEvery guide, in the order you’ll need them.
    • 1Step 1: Learn the kinds of care homes
    • 2Step 2: Ways to pay for care
    • 3Step 3: Find homes and check them
    • 4Step 4: Visit, and get the papers before you sign
    • 5Step 5: Move in
    • 6Step 6: The first months, and your rights

    Start with a question

    • Who pays for a care home?
    • Does Medi-Cal pay for a care home?
    • Board and care or assisted living?
    • Leaving the hospital soon?
    • Can a care home make someone leave?
    • Print a visit checklist
    • Check a home’s license
  • Professional tools

    • All professional tools
    • Discharge planning
    • Care management
    • Fiduciaries
    • Elder-law attorneys
    • Public-record worklist

    Care home operators

    • Manage your home’s profileYour home’s information and family inquiries.
    • Claim a home
    • Operator sign in
  • Get to know Covelight

    • How we work
    • Our data & sources
    • What’s new
    • Suggest a correction
    • Contact us
Guided search
Pearl of West HillsLicense #197609889 · Covelight Care
Covelight CarePearl of West HillsLicense #197609889 · 23427 Victory Blvd, West Hills, CA · (818) 854-6306Record printed from covelightcare.com — data as of the dates shown on each item.
Home/California/Los Angeles County/West Hills/Pearl of West Hills
Map · 23427 Victory Blvd

© Protomaps © OpenStreetMap

Estimated starting rate$5,450/mo

Covelight estimate · likely $4,450–$6,700 · See costs

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question
  • (818) 854-6306

    From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

PW

Call Pearl of West Hills

West Hills · Licensed for 6

(818) 854-6306

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Small home · Licensed for 6 · West Hills

Pearl of West Hills

23427 Victory Blvd, West Hills, CA 91307 · Licensed since 2020

  • Overview
  • Care
  • Costs
  • Daily life
  • Location
  • State record

Pearl of West Hills

Overview

Estimated starting rate

$5,450 a month

Covelight estimate · likely $4,450–$6,700 See costs

No openings reported

  • Approved by the state: Wheelchair · Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
  • Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record

Ask this home

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Care and support

  • Wheelchairup to 6 residents
  • Hospiceup to 6 residents
  • Bedriddenup to 1 resident

Not on file: dementia approval.

Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.

Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER; APPROVED FOR CAPACITY OF 6 NON-AMBULATORY OF WHICH 1 MAY BE BEDRIDDEN; BEDROOM 4 IS CLEARED FOR BEDRIDDEN ONLY; HOSPICE WAIVER APPROVED FOR 6 RESIDENTS

935 - ELDERLY

CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026

As needs change

  • Staying through hospice

    Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life

    State licensing record · October 26, 2026

We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Pearl of West Hills: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.

Check availability

What it costs here

Covelight estimate

$5,450a month to start

Likely $4,450–$6,700

From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file

Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$5,450likely a month
Room
Daily care
Sharing the room

Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.

  • Starting monthly rate$5,450likely $4,450–$6,700

    Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600

    Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).

  • One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000

    Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.

Likely monthly totalLikely $4,450–$6,850
$5,450
First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $5,250–$10,000
$7,950
How people payPrivate pay, Medi-Cal waiver, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
  • MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
  • Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
  • Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
  • SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
  • VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
  • Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
If the money runs out, what Medi-Cal covers
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $4,000 to $6,000

$4,000$6,700

EstimateLikely rangeA nearby home’s published starting rate

8 homes like this within 5 miles publish starting rates mostly between $4,400–$5,700.

  • 4th Generation Senior LivingWest Hills · 0.2 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · memory care shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026. We don’t have this home’s dementia-care disclosure. California requires a home that advertises dementia care to describe that care in writing when you ask.
  • My Home of AgingWoodland Hills · 0.6 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Elite Retirement ResidenceWest Hills · 0.8 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Chateau Le Petite IIIWoodland Hills · 1.1 mi · Small home
    $6,000Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
  • Wholesome Life Senior LivingCanoga Park · 2.2 mi · Small home
    $5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
  • Topanga Gardens Residential Home CareCanoga Park · 3.3 mi · Small home
    $4,000Listed on its own website · shared room, starting rate · seen October 5, 2026
  • Liebelove CareWoodland Hills · 4.2 mi · Small home
    $5,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
  • Blue Skies RanchTarzana · 4.6 mi · Small home
    $4,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

  • Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
  • Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
  • Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
  • Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
  • We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
  • It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
  • The care level

    Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.

  • What is billed separately

    Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.

  • Move-in costs

    A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.

  • Increases

    California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.

Ask for the price

An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.

Daily life

Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.

The best way to see it is a visit.

Request a tour

Where it is

23427 Victory Blvd, West Hills, CA 91307Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.

Opening the neighborhood map…

  1. 1UCLA West Valley Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list1.2 mi

Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).

Open directions ↗

The state record

California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197609889 · See the state’s own record ↗

The last 36 months — 6 of 19 documents

Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 3 “Unsubstantiated”.

20261 state visit · 1 document

Oct 22, 2026Facility evaluation reportReport on file

We haven’t transcribed this report yet. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20252 state visits · 2 documents

Jul 10, 2025Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit a resident while in care Staff denied a resident from food while in care

At approximately 9:10 a.m. on 07/10/25 Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced complaint visit. LPA met with the administrator and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegations above, LPA interviewed the administrator, two (02) residents, and a social worker between 9:15 a.m. and 11:45 a.m. today, conducted a record review of pertinent records, including but not limited to an admission agreement, care plan, and medical assessment, at 9:30 a.m., and toured the facility inside and out at 9:40 a.m. Regarding the allegation "Staff hit a resident while in care" it was alleged the administrator slapped and karate chopped Resident #1 (R1). Interview with the administrator at 9:15 a.m. today revealed they never hit R1. The administrator noted R1 was having difficulty adjusting to the facility. Interview with R1’s roommate, Resident #2 (R2) revealed they never witnessed R1 get hit by anyone. R2 noted R1 panicked recently about something imaginary. Unsubstantiated Interview with R1 at approximately 9:35 a.m. revealed they had never been hit by the administrator and enjoyed the facility. Interview with a social worker at R1’s day program at 11:30 a.m. revealed R1 had difficulty adjusting to the day program as well. The social worker also did not observe any marks or bruising on R1. Record review of R1’s file indicated some cognitive impairment but otherwise no pertinent information. LPA observed no bruising or marks on R1 during the interview. Based on observations and interviews, nobody indicated that the administrator had hit or hurt R1. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Staff denied a resident from food while in care” it was alleged the administrator denied R1 a second portion of food when requested. Interview with the administrator revealed R1 was diabetic and often requested food s high in sugar when they saw other residents eating. The administrator noted they had to verbally redirect R1 from eating pastries and cakes as they may be harmful to their health. The administrator also confirmed they never denied R1 any food and offered healthier options instead. Interviews with R1 and R2 revealed that neither had been denied food and both were fed well and enjoyed the facility food. Record review revealed R1 was taking medication three (03) times daily for diabetes. LPA observed adequate supplies of perishable and non-perishable food in the home. Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the administrator offered R1 healthy alternatives but never denied R1 any food. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No immediate health or safety hazards were observed during today’s visit. Exit interview conducted. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 10, 2025 · control 31-AS-20250706210620
Jun 27, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At approximately 9:30 a.m. on 06/27/25, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA met with Staff #1 (S1) and disclosed the reason for the visit. The facility was last visited on 04/20/34 for an annual inspection. It is a single story building with four (04) bedrooms, three (03) bathrooms, kitchen, common areas, and outdoor areas. It has an approved fire clearance for six (06) non-ambulatory residents, of which one (01) may be bedridden in Bedroom #4. The facility serves residents with dementia. Approved hospice waivers for six (06). At the main entrance, LPA observed postings for COVID precautions, personal rights, rights of resident councils, family councils, neighborhood complaint procedures, theft and loss policy, visitation policy, non-discrimination notice, facility sketch and license, confidential complaint contacts, ombudsman contacts, and administrator certificate. At approximately 10:00 a.m., S1 told LPA that today was their first day in the facility. S1 did not know how to access staff and resident files. At approximately 10:10 a.m. LPA observed the resident in Bedroom #1 lying in bed with full bed rails. At approximately 10:12 a.m. LPA observed two (02) bedridden residents in Bedroom #4. S1 confirmed both residents were bedridden. Both residents had full bed rails. Phone call with the administrator at approximately 10:15 a.m. revealed only one resident, Resident #1 (R1), who resided in Bedroom #4, had hospice services and physician orders for full bed rails. The administrator said the other two residents had full bed rails because that was the only bed they had available. The administrator noted neither R1’s roommate, Resident #2 (R2), nor the resident in Bedroom #1, Resident #3 (R3), were enrolled in hospice services. Neither R2 nor R3 had physician orders for full bed rails. Additionally, the administrator noted that they submitted a criminal background clearance transfer request for S1 but they were not yet associated to the facility. S1 was required to work today since the administrator could not be present and the main staff, Staff #2 (S2), was ill. S2 was also the administrator designee. No qualified administrator or designee was in charge of the facility’s operations today. The administrator called Staff #3 (S3) to come to the facility. Record review at 10:18 a.m. today revealed S1 was not associated to the facility and S3 was associated and cleared to work in the facility. S3 arrived at approximately 10:50 a.m. These deficiencies are cited on the corresponding LIC 809-D page. Civil penalties are issued in the amounts of $100 per day per unassociated staff member and a $500 immediate civil penalty for a fire clearance violation. The administrator was notified that additional civil penalties would be issued if the violations are not corrected by the POC due date. Walls, floors, windows, screens, and blinds were clean and in good repair. At 10:20 a.m. LPA measured the room temperature to be 73 degrees Fahrenheit. Puzzles, board games, and art supplies were provided in the living room. At approximately 10:25 a.m., LPA observed a fully charged fire extinguisher near the stove. A receipt was attached from 04/20/2020. The licensee was cited for this same expired fire extinguisher on 04/30/24. The deficiency was never corrected. A new deficiency is cited on the LIC 809-D page. At 10:50 a.m. LPA and S1 tested all auditory alarms. One (03) out of three (03) auditory alarms was operational. This deficiency is cited on the corresponding LIC 809-D page. The facility has three (03) bathrooms. One (01) bathroom is private, and two (02) are shared. Two (02) out of two (02) resident bathrooms contained liquid soap, paper towels, handwashing instruction sign, trash can with a tight fitting lid, grab bars near the toilet and shower, and a non-skid mat in the shower. At approximately 11:00 a.m. LPA measured the water temperature in the bathroom near the main entrance to be within regulatory range. The facility has four (04) bedrooms. Two (02) bedrooms are private and two (02) are shared. All bedrooms contained a chair, lamp, nightstand, storage, and a bed with adequate bedding. All furnishings were clean and in good condition. LPA observed an adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable foods in the refrigerator and pantry. The stove hood was clean. Appliances were in good condition. Sharps were locked below the counter. Cleaning solutions were locked in a closet near the kitchen. Medications and a complete first aid kit were locked above the washer and dryer. The washing machine and dryer were located in the kitchen. Both were in working order. LPA observed a patio area in the rear of the facility. The patio contained furniture in good condition. Ramps leading out were secure. The emergency exit path was free from obstructions. Two (02) out of two (02) exit gates were unlocked. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jun 27, 2025

20243 state visits · 3 documents

Apr 30, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

At 12:35 p.m. on 04/30/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced annual inspection. LPA met with Staff #1 (S1) and disclosed the reason for the visit. LPA and staff contacted the administrator at approximately 1:00 p.m. and disclosed the reason for the visit. LPA and S1 toured the facility inside and out. The facility was last visited on 03/22/2024 for a complaint visit. It is a single story building with four (04) bedrooms, three (03) bathrooms, kitchen, common areas, and outdoor areas. It has an approved fire clearance for six (06) non-ambulatory residents, of which one (01) may be bedridden in Bedroom #4. The facility serves residents with dementia. Approved hospice waivers for six (06). The front yard was well maintained and free of hazards. At the main entrance, LPA observed postings for COVID precautions, personal rights, rights of resident councils, family councils, neighborhood complaint procedures, theft and loss policy, visitation policy, non-discrimination notice, facility sketch and license, confidential complaint contacts, ombudsman contacts, and administrator certificate. Walls, floors, windows, screens, and blinds were clean and in good repair. At 12:50 p.m. LPA measured the room temperature to be 74 degrees Fahrenheit. Puzzles, board games, and exercise equipment were observed in the living room. Surveillance cameras monitored common areas. Three (03) out of three (03) auditory alarms were tested and functioning. At approximately 12:55 p.m. two (02) out of four (04) smoke and carbon monoxide detectors were tested and operational. Two (02) smoke alarms were removed. S1 showed LPA two (02) new smoke alarms were purchased due to the old detectors malfunctioning. The facility has three (03) bathrooms. One (01) bathroom is private, and two (02) are shared. All bathrooms contained liquid soap, paper towels, handwashing instruction sign, trash can with a tight fitting lid, grab bars near the toilet and shower, and a non-skid mat in the shower. At approximately 12:58 p.m. and 1:03 p.m. LPA measured the water temperatures in the bathrooms near the main entrance to be 135.1 degrees Fahrenheit and 136.3 degrees Fahrenheit. This deficiency is addressed on the LIC 809-D page. The facility has four (04) bedrooms. Two (02) bedrooms are private and two (02) are shared. All bedrooms contained a chair, lamp, nightstand, storage, and a bed with adequate bedding. All furnishings were clean and in good condition. All hospital beds had locked, secured wheels. LPA observed an adequate supply of perishable and non-perishable foods in the refrigerator and pantry. The stove hood was clean. Appliances were in good condition. At approximately 1:15 p.m. LPA observed a fully charged fire extinguisher near the stove. A receipt was attached from 04/20/2020. LPA discussed this deficiency with the administrator at approximately 2:00 p.m. The deficiency is cited on the LIC 809-D page. Sharps were locked below the counter. Cleaning solutions were locked in a closet near the kitchen. Medications and a complete first aid kit were locked above the washer and dryer. The washing machine and dryer were located in the kitchen. Both were out of order. S1 stated the facility is seeking repairs for the machines and performing resident laundry at a local laundromat in the meantime. LPA observed a patio area in the rear of the facility. The patio contained furniture in good condition. The wind had knocked down the large retractable umbrella. Ramps leading out were secure. The emergency exit path was free from obstructions. Exit gates were unlocked. At approximately 1:45 p.m. LPA conducted a record review of resident and personnel files. S1’s tuberculosis test and updated CPR and First Aid certificates were not available for audit. Resident #1 (R1) and Resident #2 (R2) had diagnoses of dementia on their medical assessments. Their most recent medical assessments were older than 12 months. These deficiencies were cited on the LIC 809-D page. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 30, 2024

The state marks this report as 9 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 5. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Apr 3, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff did not follow resident's care plan. Staff did not give resident medication as prescribed. Facility night staff were not available to assist the resident. Staff did not properly handle resident's medication. Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs.

At 3:10 p.m. on 04/03/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with the licensee and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegations above, LPA conducted an initial visit on 10/24/2023 and toured the facility at 10:30 a.m., reviewed pertinent records at 10:40 a.m. of pertinent records including but not limited to the resident list, staff list, medical assessment, and hospital records, and interviewed Staff #1 (S1) at 10:50 a.m. and the licensee at approximately 12:00 p.m. LPA conducted a subsequent visit on 03/20/2024 and interviewed the licensee at 9:45 a.m. and two (02) out of three (03) residents at 3:45 p.m. and toured the facility at 10:15 a.m. Today, LPA toured the facility at 3:15 p.m. Regarding the allegation “Staff did not follow resident's care plan” it was alleged staff did not turn Resident #1 (R1) as instructed on their care plan. Interview with S1 revealed they turned R1 whenever they requested and R1 could turn themselves as well. Unsubstantiated Interview with the licensee revealed R1 did not like to be rotated often due to pain, but staff rotated R1 approximately every two (02) to three (03) hours. Residents interviewed revealed they had no concerns with the care provided by the facility. Based on interviews, staff repositioned R1 sufficiently. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Staff did not give resident medication as prescribed” it was alleged staff provided R1 double doses of medication. Interviews with S1, the licensee, and residents confirmed the facility does not provide double doses of medications. Staff provide medications at the time prescribed and follow physician orders for “as needed” medications. No residents reported any issues with receiving incorrect amounts of medications. Based on interviews, staff did not provide R1 with double doses of medication. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Facility night staff were not available to assist the resident” it was alleged staff “was asleep upstairs” and unable to assist R1 at night. Interview with S1 revealed they are on-call at night and available to assist residents if needed. Interview with the licensee confirmed they and S1 assist residents at night if needed. S1 and the licensee further clarified that the facility does not have an upstairs. Interview with residents confirmed staff are available to assist them at night. Residents had no issues receiving care at night. Based on interviews, staff were available to help residents at night. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Staff did not properly handle resident's medication” it was alleged staff left R1’s medication out and accessible on their nightstand. Interview with the licensee revealed all medications are locked and centrally stored. When R1 requested pain medication, the licensee prepared one nighttime dose in a plastic bag. S1 then assisted with the nighttime dose. S1 and the licensee stated they do not and have not left medications on nightstands or out in the open. Interviews with residents confirmed staff do not leave medication out. Based on interviews, staff properly handled R1’s medication. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Staff did not meet resident's hygiene needs” it was alleged staff did not assist with R1’s toileting needs. Interview with S1 revealed they changed R1 whenever necessary. The facility also ordered a urinal for R1 to use. S1 stated R1 had no bowel movements during their time at the facility. Interviews with residents revealed they had no concerns about the facility’s incontinence care. Based on interviews, staff met R1’s hygiene needs. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No immediate health and safety risks were observed during this visit. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 3, 2024 · control 31-AS-20231020083303
Mar 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff member is physically abusing a resident Staff member is verbally abusing a resident

At 3:00 p.m. on 03/22/2024, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Nicholas Reed conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit. LPA met with staff and disclosed the reason for the visit. To investigate the allegations above, LPA conducted an initial visit on 03/20/2024 and interviewed Staff #2 (S2) at 9:45 a.m., Family #1 (F1) at 10:30 a.m., and two (02) out of three (03) residents at 3:45 p.m., conducted a records review at 10:00 a.m., and toured the facility inside and out at 10:15 a.m. Today, LPA interviewed F1 again at 1:40 p.m., Resident #1 (R1) at 3:30 p.m., and staff #1 (S1) at 3:40 p.m., and toured the facility at 3:20 p.m. Regarding the allegation “Staff member is physically abusing a resident” it was alleged S2 slapped R1. Interview with R1 at 4:00 p.m. on 03/20/24 revealed S2 slapped R1. No further details were provided about the time or place of the slap. Unsubstantiated Interview with S2 revealed they did not slap R1 and R1 was fabricating. Interview with Resident #2 (R2) at 3:50 p.m. on 03/20/2024 revealed they have not witnessed, heard, or experienced physical abuse in the facility. Interviews with F1 revealed R1 had difficulty distinguishing between delusions and reality. Interview with S1 confirmed S2 never slapped R1. Based on interviews, residents, family, and staff did not witness S2 slap R1 and cannot confirm if it did or did not happen. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Regarding the allegation “Staff member is verbally abusing a resident” it was alleged S2 yelled at R1. Interview with R1 at 4:00 p.m. on 03/20/24 revealed S2 got angry and yelled at R1. No further details were provided. Interview with S2 revealed they did not yell at R1. Interview with R2 revealed they have not witnessed, heard, or experienced verbal abuse or yelling in the facility. Interviews with F1 revealed they were not aware of R1 being yelled at. Interview with S1 confirmed S2 did not and does not yell at R1. Based on interviews, residents, family, and staff did not witness or hear S2 yell at R1 and cannot confirm if it did or did not happen. Therefore, the allegation is deemed UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. No immediate health and safety risks were observed during this visit. Exit interview conducted. Appeal rights discussed. Copy of report provided.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 22, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240315142734
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 13 documents

20231 state visit · 1 document

Feb 6, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not properly assist in feeding resident.

This is to amend the report that was delivered on 02/06/2023. Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Abeye Duguma conducted an unannounced initial complaint visit to the facility. LPA arrived at 1:30 PM. Upon entry, LPA met with the caregiver,Olga Knyazeva and explained the reason for the visit. Olga Knyazeva was degnated by the administrator, Irina Karbachinskiy, to sign and accept this report. --- Facility staff did not properly assist in feeding resident. It was alleged that staff are putting food into the resident’s mouth despite it running out of their mouth. To investigate this allegation, on 02/06/2023, LPA interviewed the Administrator at around 2:00 PM, requested pertinent documents at 2:45 PM and interviewed other parties at 3:15 PM. During interviews with the Administrator, they stated that Resident #1 (R1) has difficulty swallowing, needs prompts to swallow and at times forgets that there is food in their mouth. (Cont. on LIC 9099-C) Substantiated Administrator also stated that they do not feed R1 while they have food in their mouth and that staff do not have client specific training regarding feeding assistance and aspiration pneumonia or any recent training by an agency. During record reviews, LPA discovered that R1 needs feeding assistance due to health conditions. Record review also revealed that staff do not have client specific training regarding feeding assistance and aspiration pneumonia. During interview with other parties, they stated that R1 was being fed while food was running down the side of R1's mouth. Based on interviews and record review, there is sufficient corroborating information to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is SUBSTANTIATED at this time. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 Chapter 8 of the CA Code of Regulations, the following deficiencies were cited (refer to LIC 9099-D): No health and safety hazards were noted during the visit. Exit interview was conducted and a copy of the report was issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 6, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230203150413

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(c)(3)(B) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 7, 2023

Personnel Requirements - General (c)All RCFE staff who assist residents with personal activities of daily living shall receive initial and annual training as specified in Health & Safety Code sections 1569.625 and 1569.69 (3) The training shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Importance and techniques of personal care services, including but not limited to,..feeding...This requirement is not met as evidenced by; Based on interviews & record review, staff do not have client specific training for feeding assistance & aspiration pneumonia which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 6, 2023

Plan of correction: Administrator will ensure that all staff get client specific training for feeding assistance and aspiration pneumonia by the POC due date.

20225 state visits · 5 documents

May 3, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file

Type of visit: Required - 1 Year

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced required annual visit. LPA met with administrator and explained the reason for this visit. Upon entry LPA was properly screened using covid protocols. LPA had temperature checked and signed into facility log. LPA conducted a physical plant tour from 9:10-9:30am. Facility has four bedrooms and three bathrooms. Four bedrooms and two of the bathrooms are for resident use. One bathroom is designated for staff and visitors. LPA observed all resident bedrooms and bathrooms to be appropriately furnished. Carbon monoxide and smoke detector are combination and hard wired throughout the facility and were functioning properly. LPA observed the kitchen area for the ability to prepare and store food. LPA observed there to be a sufficient amount of perishable and non perishable food. Sharp objects were observed to be locked away and inaccessible. Medications are stored in a lock cabinet in the laundry area which is adjacent to the kitchen area. Common areas were observed to be properly furnished. LPA checked the backyard for clutter and debris. There is an additional non-attached dwelling unit on the property which is gated off from the facility. Administrator states she lives in the unit. Facility has two residents that are receiving hospice services at this time. LPA observed one resident to have full bed rails but is not receiving hospice services. Exit Interview conducted. Deficiency cited on LIC 809 D. Appeal Rights explained.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, May 3, 2022
Mar 4, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted a case management visit due to observations that were observed on a complaint visit on 3/2/22 . During the visit it was found that staff #1 (S1) that was working at the facility was not cleared or associated to work in the facility. S1 was left alone caring for the residents with no other staff working. LPA met with staff and explained the reason for this visit. LPA met with the licensee as LPA was leaving the visit and explained the reason for this visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 4, 2022

(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (1) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Departmentr This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not ensuring staff 1 (S1) obtained criminal record clearance prior to employment which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 4, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee stated that S1 would not be at the facility until proper criminal record clearance is granted for S1.

Mar 2, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility does not have any planned activities Facility does not have enough staff

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the allegations above. LPA met with staff and explained the reason for this visit. LPA spoke with the administrator by telephone and explained the reason for the visit. Administrator stated they would come to the facility later due to being in the emergency room with another client. LPA toured the physical plant of the facility from 9:45-10:10am to ensure no immediate health and safety issues. It is alleged that the facility does not have any planned activities. LPA conducted interviews with residents from 10:15-10:45am regarding this allegation. LPA had previously conducted interviews with the Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) and the administrator regarding this allegation. Information obtained through interviews reveal that there were no planned activities for the residents. Therefore this allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Deficiency cited on LIC 9099 D. Substantiated It is alleged that facility does not have enough staff to meet the needs of all the residents. LPA had previously conducted interviews with residents, staff, and LTCO prior to coming to this visit. LPA also had conducted a case management visit on 2/16/22 where interviews were conducted. Based on the information obtained through interviews this allegation is deemed Substantiated. Facility does not have enough staff to support the needs of all of their residents. Resident #1 (R1) is not able to leave the facility for a walk or go on outings due to lack of staff. Deficiencies cited on LIC 9099 D. Appeal Rights explained. Exit Interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2022 · control 31-AS-20220301152954

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 4, 2022

Personnel Requirements-Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted facility did not have enough staff to meet all resident needs. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2022

Plan of correction: Administrator stated they have hired additional staff. A staff schedule will be sent to LPA to clear deficiency.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87219(a) · Plan of correction due date: Mar 2, 2022

Planned Activities-Residents shall be encouraged to maintain and develop their fullest potential for independent living through participation in planned activities. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted residents did not have planned activities which posed a personal rights violation to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Mar 2, 2022

Plan of correction: Corrected before visit. Activity calendar was given to LPA.

Feb 16, 2022Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherDeficiency page: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Other

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced case management visit. LPA was joined by Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) Ginger Perini and Erin Pickerel during this visit. Upon entry to the facility LPA conducted a physical plant walk through to ensure no immediate health and safety issues. LTCO conducted interviews with residents in the facility while LPA conducted a walk through of the facility. During the course of the visit LPA observed that the administrator's administrator certificate had expired as of 8/8/2020. Facility was previously cited on 11/8/21 regarding the expired administrator's certificate. Administrator still has not renewed their administrator's certificate. During the course of the visit LPA and LTCO spoke with the administrator regarding the facilities policy on residents leaving the facility, Activities for residents in the facilities, and LTCO's role when visiting the facility. During the visit the administrator was given an LTCO Poster which was posted during the visit. Exit Interview conducted. Copy of report emailed to administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2022

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87406(g) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 18, 2022

87406 Administrator Certification Requirements (g) Certificates issued under this section shall be renewed every two (2) years provided the certificate holder has complied with all renewal requirements. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of records and interview with licensee which revealed the Licensees Administrator Certificate expired 08/08/2020 and the Administrator has not taken the required classes to renew the required Administrator Certificate which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 16, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator will notify the department when they will renew their certificate and who will be the designated administrator for the facility while she completes the renewal process.

Jan 19, 2022Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff restricting resident from having phone calls Staff are mismanaging resident's medication

An unannounced subsequent complaint visit was conducted on this day by licensing program analyst (LPA) Yelena Avetisyan. Upon arrival LPA met with ---- and informed her the purpose of the visit. Regarding the allegation of Staff restricting resident from having phone calls it was reported that families are able to speak with the residents only by calling the phone number of the Licensee Irina Karbachinskiy. It was also reported that the administrator would not allow resident 1 (R1) to have phone calls with family members in private. An initial 10 day complaint visit was conducted on 11/17/2021. During the visit interview was held with the licensee who confirmed that they no longer have a facility phone line and when anyone wants to speak with a resident they will call her on her cell phone. When asked licensee also stated that she was very particular with R1 and would be present during phone calls. During the 11/17/2021 LPA informed the administrator that per title 22 regulations all facilities are required to have telephone service on the premises at all times. LPA also informed the administrator that she is violating the residents personal rights by not allowing them to make and receive personal/confidential calls. Substantiated The licensee informed the LPA that she would disconnect the telephone line from the facility fax to ensure that they have telephone services at all times. On 12/3/2021 LPA spoke with the licensee regarding her pending plan of corrections. During that phone call LPA was informed that the licensee was continuing to use the phone number for the fax. on 12/6/2021 at 2:05 pm LPA called the facility phone number, which kept ringing. LPA called again at 2:07 pm at which time the fax line was connected. On 1/18/2022 at 3:30 pm LPA called the facility phone number which kept ringing until the fax line was connected. Based on the interviews conducted and attempted phone calls made to the facility the department has obtained sufficient information to determine that the facility Staff are restricting resident from having phone calls therefore the allegation is Substantiated. Regarding the allegation of Staff are mismanaging resident's medication it was reported that the licensee and staff are not ensuring residents medications are given as prescribed. An initial 10 day complaint visit was conducted on 11/17/2021 at which time LPA observed and documented as Licensee Irina Karbachinskiy counted medications for 2 residents. .Review of the medication records, and medication count revealed that Licensee and/or staff mismanaged 6 or R1's medications by not ensuring they were given according to the physicians order. Review of the medications revealed that licensee had extra medications for 5 of the 6 medications and the 6 th medication Divalproex had run out without being refilled or discontinued by the physician. Licensee and/or staff also mismanaged medications for R2 by not ensuring that 4 medications were given according to the physicians order therefore the allegation is Substantiated. Exit interview conducted, copy of report, citations, civil penalties and appeal rights issued and emailed to the licensee.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 19, 2022 · control 31-AS-20211109140750

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(14 · Plan of correction due date: Jan 21, 2022

(a) Residents in all residential care facilities for the elderly shall have all of the following personal rights: (14) To have reasonable access to telephones, to both make and receive confidential calls. The licensee may require reimbursement for long distance calls. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview the licensee did not comply with the cited sections by allowing R1 to have personal/confidential phone calls with family which posed an immediate personal rightsviolation to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 19, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee will review the cited regulation 87468.1. Licensee will submit a written statement that they have reviewed the regulation and indicate what steps will be taken to ensure the residents personal rights are not violated.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87311 · Plan of correction due date: Jan 21, 2022

All facilities shall have telephone service on the premises. Facilities with a capacity of sixteen (16) or more persons shall be listed in the telephone directory under the name of the facility. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interview and attempted telephone calls to the facility the licensee did not comply with the cited section by not ensuring that a telephone service is available on the premises at all times which poses an immediate personal rights violation to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 19, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee will notify the department in writing what steps have been taken to correct this deficiency, Licensee and administrator will also submit a written statement that telephone services will be made available at the facility at all times.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Jan 21, 2022

(5) The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on medication count the licensee did not comply with the section cited by not assisting R1 and R2 with self administered medications as prescribed which posed/poses an immediate health and safety and personal right risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jan 19, 2022

Plan of correction: Licensee and all staff attended vendorized medication training on 12/19/2021. Licensee will submit a written statement notifying the department what steps will be taken to ensure residents are assisted with medications as prescribed.

20214 state visits · 7 documents

Dec 23, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hits residents.

On this day Licening Program Analyst (LPA) Eleza Jackson conducted a facility tour to ensure no immediate health and safety issues were present. LPA Jackson did not observe any immediate health and safety issues. LPA Jackson met with the facility administrator upon her arrival at approximately 1430hrs and explained the reason for this visit. It is alleged that the facility administrator hits residents in the facility. LPA Jackson was unable to locate former resident(s). Based on the inability to locate former resident(s) this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report emailed to administrator with signature. Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2021 · control 31-AS-20211210153243

The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 1. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

Dec 23, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff slapped a resident Staff does not allow resident to keep personal items in their drawer spaces Staff did not make medications inaccessible to residents Staff did not report incidents as required

On this day Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Eleza Jackson conducted a facility tour to ensure no immediate health and safety issues were present. LPA Jackson did not observe any immediate health and safety issues. LPA Jackson met with the facility administrator upon her arrival at approximately 1430hrs and explained the reason for this visit. On 10/21/21 Eleza Jackson and Wendell Smith conducted an unannounced complaint visit to investigate the allegations above. LPA's met with the facility administrator and explained the reason for this visit. Upon entry to the facility a physical plant tour was conducted from approximately 9:50am-10:10am to ensure no immediate health and safety issues were present. LPA's did not observe any immediate health and safety issues. It is alleged that the facility administrator hits residents in the facility. LPA's conducted interviews with residents and facility staff from approximately 10:20-11:20am and it was determined that staff nor administrator has hit residents. A subsequent telephonic interview was conducted with R1 on 11/02/2021; at approximately 12:56pm and the interview supported the previous interview findings. Based on information obtained through subsequent interviews and interviews conducted at the visit; this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Unsubstantiated Staff does not allow resident to keep personal items in their drawer spaces It is alleged that the facility administrator and staff does not allow resident to keep personal items in their drawer spaces. LPA's conducted interviews with residents and facility staff from approximately 10:20-11:20am and observed resident belongings stored in drawers. Based on information obtained through interviews and observations during the visit this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff did not make medications inaccessible to residents It is alleged that the facility administrator and staff did not make medications inaccessible to residents. Upon entry to the facility a physical plant tour was conducted from approximately 9:50am-10:10am. LPAs observed medications labeled, locked, and inaccessible to residents. Based on observations during the visit this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff did not report incidents as required It is alleged that the staff did not report incidents as required. There were no incidents reported at the visit. Based on information obtained through interviews and observations during the visit this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report emailed to administrator with signature.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2021 · control 31-AS-20211013144148
Dec 23, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: STAFF DID NOT SEEK MEDICAL ATTENTION IN A TIMELY MANNER

On this day Licening Program Analyst (LPA) Eleza Jackson conducted a facility tour to ensure no immediate health and safety issues were present. LPA Jackson did not observe any immediate health and safety issues. LPA Jackson met with the facility administrator upon her arrival at approximately 1430hrs and explained the reason for this visit. It is alleged that the facility administrator did not seek medical attention in a timely manner for Resident 1 (R1) in the facility. LPA conducted interviews with resident(s), administrator, and facility staff on 12/01/21 from approximately 10:20-11:20am. Interviews revealed that the Facility Administrator admitted to waiting over 20 days to send R1 to hospital for medical attention. Based on the information obtained through interviews this allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2021 · control 31-AS-20211129160812

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Dec 24, 2022

Incidental Medical... A plan for incidental medical...shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: The licensee shall arrange, or assist in arranging, for medical and dental care appropriate to the conditions and needs of residents. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted with administrator and R1 that revealed that the administrator did not receive medical attention in a timely manner which posed an Incidental Medical...violation to resident(s) in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 23, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator will submit a written step by step guide to ensure that facility clients medical needs are met and that residents do not experience neglect.

Nov 17, 2021Facility evaluation reportPOCReport on file

Type of visit: POC

An unannounced Plan of Correction (POC) visit was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yelena Avetisyan. The purpose of this visit is to follow up on the Case Management Deficiencies visit and a subsequent complaint visit Complaint Control # 31-AS-20210416135138 which were conducted on 11/5/2021. Upon arrival LPA met with staff Olga Nikolaevna, Licensee/administrator Irina Karbachinskiy arrived to the facility approximately 3:20 pm. During the 11/5/2021 Case Management Deficiencies visit the licensee was issued a citation for the deficiency of not having a certified administrator working at the facility. The plan of correction due date for the citation was 11/8/2021. As of today's visit a plan of correction has not been submitted to the Department. The licensee was also cited for the same deficiency on 4/20/2021 and did not submit the plan of correction. For the subsequent complaint visit the licensee was cited for: 87465 (e) For every prescription and nonprescription PRN medication for which the licensee provides assistance there shall be a signed, dated written order from a physician on a prescription blank, maintained in the resident's file, and a label on the medication. Both the physician's order and the label shall contain at least all of the following information. The plan of correction was for the licensee to schedule vendorized medication training for all staff and submit a written statement notifying the department what steps will be taken to prevent the reoccurrence of the cited deficiency on or before 11/8/2021. 87465 (C3)(D3) If the resident's physician has stated in writing that the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for nonprescription PRN medication but can communicate his/her symptoms clearly, facility staff shall be permitted to assist the resident with self-administration, provided all of the following requirements are met: (3) A record of each dose is maintained in the resident's record. The record shall include the date & time the PRN medication was taken, the dosage taken, & the resident's response. The plan of correction was for the licensee to schedule vendorized medication training by 11/8/2021 87465 (c)(2) (c) If the resident's physician has stated in writing that the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for nonprescription PRN medication but can communicate his/her symptoms clearly, facility staff shall be permitted to assist the resident with self-administration, provided the following requirements are met: (2) Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions. The plan of correction was for the licensee to schedule vendorized medication training for all staff and submit a written statement notifying the department what steps will be taken to prevent the reoccurrence of the cited deficiency on or before 11/8/2021. As of today's visit Licensee has failed to submit the plan of corrections for all deficiencies documented in this report, which were cited on 11/5/2021. The licensing reports issued on 11/5/2021 gave notice that failure to correct the violations within a specified length of time would result in civil penalties. Because the licensee failed to make the corrections by the specified dates a civil penalty in the amount of $100 dollars per violation per day will be assessed until the plan of correction is submitted. Exit interview conducted, copy of report, citations and civil penalties emailed to the administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 17, 2021
Nov 5, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff hit resident Staff caused injury to resident

An unannounced subsequent complaint visit was conducted on this day by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yelena Avetisyan. In regard to the allegation it was reported that facility staff injured Resident 1 (R1) by hitting R1 in the eye resulting in severe bruising. These allegations were investigated by Lorraine Patterson, Investigator with Community Care Licensing Division’s Investigations Branch. On 04/26/2021 Investigator Patterson conducted interviews with various individuals including the Licensee/Administrator Irina Karbachinsky, Resident 2 (R2), facility volunteer. Additionally, on 4/26/2021 Investigator attempted to interview Resident 1 (R1) but was unable to do so. On 5/20/2021 Investigator Patterson conducted interview with R1’s responsible party and hospice staff. The investigator attempted to interview the complainant but was unable to do so. Unsubstantiated On 5/27/2021 Investigator conducted review of the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) Incident report which documented that the police were called to the facility for a welfare check. During the call officers spoke with licensee/administrator, hospice nurse, and R1’s responsible party. The LAPD report documented “The Reason and Cause of Injury as: Accident, Fall. The Extent of Injury: Minor” Information obtained during the course of the investigation revealed the following: On 3/27/2021 R1 was very agitated at the facility. Due to the agitation resident was running around the facility and ran into the facilities closed sliding door hitting his/her face. After the incident Administrator contacted the hospice agency. Hospice nurse visited R1 and completed an assessment. Administrator also contacted R1’s responsible party/family to notify them of the incident. Based on the lack of witnesses and evidence to corroborate the allegations Investigator Patterson has determined the allegations to be Unsubstantiated at this time. Facility increased resident's rate without proper notice: In regard to the allegation it was reported that the licensee/administrator increased Resident 1 (R1’s) fees several times after admission to the facility without providing proper notice. During the initial 10-day complaint visit which was conducted on 4/20/2021 LPA conducted interview with the administrator Irina Karbachinsky. When interviewed the Administrator denied raising R1’s monthly fees. On 10/17/2021 LPA conducted interview with R1’s responsible party/family who also denied that the R1’s fees were increased from the initial agreed upon rate. Based on the information obtained from the interviews conducted the allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted and copy of report emailed to the administrator IRINA_KARBACHINSKIY@HOTMAIL.COM On 10/17/2021 LPA conducted review of the submitted CSMDR, hospice medication list for March and April 2021. Records reviewed revealed that R1 does not have a prescription for Geodon, and the medication is not listed/documented in facility, hospital, hospice records or any of the submitted/reviewed records. Additionally, LPA conducted medication count utilizing the photos taken of the medications in bubble packs on 4/20/2021. LPA also used the information provided by the licensee such as the start dates, hospitalization dates and the order dates listed on the hospice records. Medication count revealed the following: R1’s medications were not assisted with as prescribed. R1 was given additional doses of various medications. (7 extra pills of temazepam, 4 extra pills of melatonin, 25 (21 and 4) extra pills of Quetiapine/Seroquel from 2 different prescriptions. During the 4/20/2021 visit the administrator did not provide the medication Lorazepam/Ativan for LPA to review. The medication was also not listed in the March 2021 CSMDR. Medication documentation reviewed also revealed inconsistencies with the hospice medication list, licensees CSMDR and the medication orders on the bubble packs. Based on the medications counted and records reviewed the allegation is Substantiated. Exit interview conducted, copy of report citations and appeal rights emailed to the administrator IRINA_KARBACHINSKIY@HOTMAIL.COMthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2021 · control 31-AS-20210416135138

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(C3)(D3) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 8, 2021

If the resident's physician has stated in writing that the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for nonprescription PRN medication but can communicate his/her symptoms clearly, facility staff shall be permitted to assist the resident with self-administration, provided all of the following requirements are met: (3) A record of each dose is maintained in the resident's record. The record shall include the date & time the PRN medication was taken, the dosage taken, & the resident's response. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on records review and interview the licensee did not comply with the cited sections by not documenting when PRN medications were administered to R1. Which posed anthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2021

Plan of correction: immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to R1. Licensee/Administrator will schedule vendorized medication training for all staff. Training will need to be scheduled within 24 hours and completed by 11/19/2021

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(c)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 8, 2021

(c) If the resident's physician has stated in writing that the resident is unable to determine his/her own need for nonprescription PRN medication but can communicate his/her symptoms clearly, facility staff shall be permitted to assist the resident with self-administration, provided the following requirements are met: (2) Once ordered by the physician the medication is given according to the physician's directions.This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on medication review the licensee did not comply with the cited sections by not giving medications per the physicians directions which posed an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator will schedule vendorized medication training for all staff. Training will need to be scheduled within 24 hours and completed by 11/19/2021 Licensee/Administrator will also submit a written statement notifying the department what steps will be taken to prevent the reoccurrence of the cited deficiency.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87465(e) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 8, 2021

(e) For every prescription and nonprescription PRN medication for which the licensee provides assistance there shall be a signed, dated written order from a physician on a prescription blank, maintained in the resident's file, and a label on the medication. Both the physician's order and the label shall contain at least all of the following information. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on hospital records review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not having a signed written order from a physician for the medication Geodon given to resident 1 which posed an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to R1.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee/Administrator will schedule vendorized medication training for all staff. Training will need to be scheduled within 24 hours and completed by 11/19/2021 Licensee/Administrator will also submit a written statement notifying the department what steps will be taken to prevent the reoccurrence of the cited deficiency.

Nov 5, 2021Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A

Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Yelena Avetisyan conducted an unannounced Virtual Case Management Deficiencies visit due to deficiencies observed during the investigation of complaint control 31-AS-20210416135138 on 4/20/2021. Upon entrance to the facility LPA was greeted by 2 staff. At 3:35 pm LPA spoke with the licensee who stated that she would come to the facility shortly. Administrator arrived approximately 4:05 pm. LPA held a discussion Ms. Karbachinskiy regarding the status of her administrator certificate. Per Licensee she has not completed all the required classes and has not hired a certified administrator to oversee the facility. Prior to this visit LPA conducted a review of the licensing information system and obtained the names of all staff who are associated with the facility. Upon review of the records LPA observed that the 2 staff working at the facility are not associated with the facility. At 4:14 pm LPA called the Woodland Hills Regional office and clarified that staff 1 (S1) has criminal record clearance, however staff 2 (S2) does not have criminal record clearance. A discussion was held with the administrator regarding criminal record clearance requirements. Exit interview conducted, copy of report, citations, civil penalties and appeal rights issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2021

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 5, 2021

(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (2) Request a transfer of a criminal record clearance as specified in Section 87355(c) or This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not transferring criminal record clearance for staff 1 (S1) to this facility prior to employment which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee Irina Karbachinskiy provided transfer of criminal record clearance and photo ID to the LPA during the visit.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87355(e)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 5, 2021

(e) All individuals subject to a criminal record review pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 1569.17(b) shall prior to working, residing or volunteering in a licensed facility: (1) Obtain a California clearance or a criminal record exemption as required by the Departmentr This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on record review the licensee did not comply with the section cited above by not ensuring staff 2 (S2) obtained criminal record clearance prior to employment which poses an immediate health, safety or personal rights risk to persons in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2021

Plan of correction: Licensee Irina Karbachinskiy requested for staff member to leave the facility. Licensee provided LPA a signed written statement that the staff # 2 will not return to the facility until criminal record clearance is obtained.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87406(g) · Plan of correction due date: Nov 8, 2021

87406 Administrator Certification Requirements (g) Certificates issued under this section shall be renewed every two (2) years provided the certificate holder has complied with all renewal requirements. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on review of records and interview with licensee which revealed the Licensees Administrator Certificate expired 08/08/2020 and the Administrator has not taken the required classes to renew the required Administrator Certificate which poses an immediate health, safety and personal rights risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Nov 5, 2021

Plan of correction: This deficiency was cited on 4/20/2021. As of todays visit Licensee Irina Karbachinskiy confirmed that she has not completed all of the required classes to renew her certificate. Licensee/Administrator will notify the department when they will renew their certificate and who will be the designated administrator for the facility while she completes the renewal process.

Oct 21, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff yell at residents Staff does not allow resident's to leave the facility Staff confiscated resident's clothing Facility does not have planned activities Staff are not following COVID protocol

Licensing Program Analyst(s) Eleza Jackson and Wendell Smith conducted an unnannounced complaint visit to investigate the allegations above. LPA's met with the facility administrator and explained the reason for this visit. Upon entry to the facility a physical plant tour was conducted from approximately 9:50am-10:10am to ensure no immediate health and safety issues were present. LPA's did not observe any immediate health and safety issues. Staff yell at residents It is alleged that the facility administrator have yelled at residents in the facility. LPA's conducted interviews with residents, administrator, and facility staff from approximately 10:20-11:20am. Interviews revealed that on occassion the facility administrator had yelled at resident # 1(R1) when R1 was smoking in their room and in the kitchen area. Administrator admitted to this happening and facility residents stated they overheard a staff yelling at a resident but could not state which staff was doing the yelling. Based on the information obtained through interviews this allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Substantiated Staff does not allow resident's to leave the facility It is alleged that residents are not allowed to leave the facility without permission. Interviews were conducted with residents and staff from approximately 10:20-11:20am. Interviews revealed that residents didn't feel they were able to leave the facility without permission from staff or unless they were supervised by staff. Interviews revealed that some residents do not require supervision to be outside of the facility independently. Based on the information obtained through interviews this allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Staff confiscated resident's clothing It is alleged that the administrator confiscated R1's clothing so they could not leave the facility. Interviews were conducted with the administrator regarding this allegation. Administrator stated that anytime R1 would wear clothes they would leave the facility and that due to R1's health condition their safety was in jeopardy. R1 was kept in a hospital gown or diaper while in the facility which was witnessed by visitors to the facility. Based on the information obtained through interviews this allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. Facility does not have planned activities It is alleged that the facility does not have planned activities. LPA's conducted interviews with residents and facility staff from approximately 10:20-11:20am. Interviews with residents and the administrator reveal that the facility does not have planned activities for the residents. There are some board games or television for residents to partake in but nothing planned. Based on the information obtained through interviews this allegation is deemed Substantiated. Staff are not following COVID protocol It is alleged that the staff are not checking all visitors temperatures when they visit the facility to check for signs of covid. LPA's conducted interviews with facility staff regarding this allegation. Facility staff admitted to on a few occasions on not checking a visitors temperature when they came to the facility to check on residents. During today's visit LPA's temperatures were checked before starting the visit. Based on the information obtained through interviews this allegation is deemed Substantiated at this time. All deficiencies cited on LIC 9099 D. Appeal Rights explained, Exit Interview conducted. Staff are not able to communicate with residents It is alleged that facility has staff that are not able to communicate with residents. LPA's conducted interviews with residents and staff from approximately 10:20-11:20am. Interviews revealed that staff #2(S2) does not speak English well but S2 always works with another staff who is able to communicate in English. Information from interviews reveal that on each shift there is a staff that is able to communicate in English. Based on the information obtained this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Facility does not have a poster displaying information on the appropriate reporting agency It is alleged that the facility was provided a Long Term Care Ombudsman poster on 9/20/21 but that it has not been posted in the facility. During the physical plant tour done today LPA's observed the Long Term Care Ombudsman poster to be posted by the entry to the facility. Interview with the administrator revealed that it had been posted as soon as it was provided by the Long Term Care Ombudsman. Based on information obtained through observation this allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2021 · control 31-AS-20211013144148

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(1) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 25, 2021

Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities-To be accorded dignity in their personal relationships with staff, residents, and other persons. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted it was revealed that R1 was yelled at by the facility administrator which posed a personal rights violation to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator shall submit written statement that no residents will be yelled at and will be talked to appropriately. Copy of written statement will be due by poc due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(6) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 25, 2021

Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities-To leave or depart the facility at any time and to not be locked into any room, building, or on facility premises by day or night. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted residents were not able to leave the facility at anytime. This poses a potential personal rights violation to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator shall have a meeting with all residents and explain those that are able to leave the facility without supervision shall be able to without permission. Staff will have a sign in sheet to which residents will sign that meeting too place and copy will be sent to LPA by poc due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87468.1(a)(12) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 25, 2021

Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities-To wear their own clothes; to keep and use their own personal possessions. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted it was observed and admitted to by the administrator that R1 was not able to wear or have access to their own clothes which is a violation of residents personal rights.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator will send statement that all residents will be able to wear whatever clothes they choose to and will have access to all of their clothing without interference from facility staff.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87219(a) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 25, 2021

Planned Activities-Residents shall be encouraged to maintain and develop their fullest potential for independent living through participation in planned activities. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted facility does not have any planned activities for residents.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2021

Plan of correction: Administator shall come up with an activity calendar with input from the residents of various activities that residents will be offered and can participate in. Copy of activity calendar will be sent to LPA by poc due date.

From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87468.2(a)(2) · Plan of correction due date: Oct 22, 2021

Personal Rights of Residents in All Facilities-To be accorded safe, healthful and comfortable accommodations, furnishings and equipment. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Based on interviews conducted staff were not checking all visitors temperatures upon entry to the facility which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 21, 2021

Plan of correction: Administrator shall have in-service with facility staff on the importance of checking all visitors temperatures. Copy of in-service sign in sheet shall be sent to LPA.

The state marks this report as 8 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 7. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.

4 of 6 beds were occupied at the July 10, 2025 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.

License holder

Pearl of West Hills, Inc., licensed since 2020.

The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2020, as the state’s facility page counts them
State visits on file
21
Total complaints
10
Substantiated allegations
15
Type A citations
9
Type B citations
6

These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2020, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.

Compare with homes the same size
This homeTypical
Type A citations90
Type B citations60
Substantiated allegations150
Total complaints100

“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.

What the state’s words mean
Routine visita visit the state records as “Required” — a scheduled visit, not one made in answer to a complaintSubstantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedthere was not enough evidence to prove a violation occurred — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe evidence showed the allegation was false, could not have happened, or had no reasonable basisType A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗

An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.

Open CDSS facility search ↗Report a record errorOperate this home? Respond or correct, free →
Frequently asked questions

A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.

Quick answers about Pearl of West Hills

Is Pearl of West Hills licensed?

The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

How many residents is Pearl of West Hills licensed for?

6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Has Pearl of West Hills been cited?

9 Type A and 6 Type B citations since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 21 state visits over the same years.

Is Pearl of West Hills still open?

This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.

What does Pearl of West Hills cost?

$5,450 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $4,450–$6,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”

Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 5 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.

Among 232 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,151 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 232 other homes publishing a starting rate).

Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.

A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.

The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.

A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.

Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out.

Does Pearl of West Hills take Medi-Cal?

On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home is not on the DHCS participation list dated October 1, 2026. Ask the program about current options. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.

Who holds the license?

The license is held by Pearl of West Hills, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Is there a hospital nearby?

UCLA West Valley Medical Center is 1.2 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.

Can Pearl of West Hills keep a resident on hospice?

Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.

Pearl of West Hills license and inspection record

  • Name on the license: “PEARL OF WEST HILLS, INC”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
  • License #197609889. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • Licensed to Pearl of West Hills, Inc., per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • First licensed in 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 21 state inspection visits since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
  • 9 Type A and 6 Type B citations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 21 state visits in that period.
  • 10 complaints and 15 substantiated allegations on file since 2020, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
  • The most recent state visit on file is October 22, 2026, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Type A citationa violation that poses an immediate risk to health, safety or personal rights if it is not correctedType B citationa violation that could become a risk if not corrected, or one involving records, resources or required services

California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗

See the state’s own record

Nearby

Other homes nearby

Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.

  • Map

    Woodland Hills · 0.6 mi

    My Home of Aging

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $5,500 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    West Hills · 0.2 mi

    4th Generation Senior Living

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Starting rate

    $4,500 a month to start

    Listed by the home on Seniorly · September 9, 2026

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    West Hills · 0.1 mi

    Serene Sanctuary Care Homes

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,650 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,650–$6,950

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    Woodland Hills · 0.2 mi

    Caring Care Center

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,600 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,600–$6,900

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Dementia: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    West Hills · 0.2 mi

    Anna's Home & Paradise

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,250 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,300–$6,500

    On the state record

    • Wheelchair: on the state record
    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record
  • Map

    West Hills · 0.5 mi

    Sunny Days Senior Living

    Small home · licensed for 6

    Estimated starting rate

    $5,600 a month to start

    Covelight estimate · likely $4,600–$6,900

    On the state record

    • Hospice: on the state record
    • Bedridden: on the state record

Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap

Explore Los Angeles County ↗

Do you run this home?

Add your photos, care details, and contact information. Your public profile is free.

Claim this home
Visiting in person? Print a visit sheetHow we source information
CallAsk this home
PW

Call Pearl of West Hills

West Hills · Licensed for 6

(818) 854-6306

From the state licensing record · October 26, 2026

or

Let us do the legwork

  • We ask about availability, price and the care you describe.
  • If it’s a fit, you choose whether they call you. Either way, you get every answer.
Check availabilityFree

Ask Pearl of West Hills

Check availability

Request a tour

More days
  • AskThe cost, or your own question

Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.

Covelight Care

A free directory of every licensed care home in California, built from CDSS public records.

Find your next step

Find a homeSaved homesHelp me chooseCheck a home

Make sense of care

Care guidesMedi-Cal & careYour rightsHow we workAbout this site

Work with Covelight

For professionalsFor home operatorsSuggest a correctionDevelopersContact us

© 2026 Covelight Care LLC. Homes never pay to appear or rank higher.

Covelight Care is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by the sources named on this page.

3104 O St Unit #1023, Sacramento, CA 95816

PrivacyTermsText messages