Reesejoy Care Home Ii is a residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Granada Hills, Los Angeles County, California — state license #197609853, licensed for 6 residents, listed as licensed in the CDSS record we retrieved August 2, 2026. It appears on the DHCS Assisted Living Waiver participant list checked August 9, 2026, so Medi-Cal may help pay for care services here. California has 14 dated inspection and complaint documents on file for this home going back to 2021, the most recent dated October 20, 2025 — published below in full, verbatim and unscored.

See an error in this summary? Report it — free →

15 homes in view

Reesejoy Care Home Ii

No photo on file yet

No photo of this home is on file — we show real, attributed images only, never a stock photo of someone else’s building.

Residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) · Small home, 6 residents · Granada Hills, CA · Los Angeles County
LicensedHospiceBedriddenWheelchair not on fileMemory care not on file
No openings reportedBeds change hands in days ·
License #197609853, held since 2019 · read from the California state record on August 2, 2026 ·See on State Site →
17544 San Jose St · Granada Hills, Los Angeles County
Phone
(805) 832-8792
from the state licensing roster · August 2, 2026
No Google listing is on file for this home.
Website
None on file
Many small homes have no website — that says nothing about the care inside.
Contact facts come from the state roster, a county Area Agency on Aging roster, the home’s Google listing, or the operator — each labelled, never blended. Operators: add or correct yours, free →
Print tour sheet →

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryNot on file — ask the home
Dementia / memory careNot on file — ask the home
Hospice careApproved for 6 residents
Bedridden careVerified in record

“Not on file” is not a no — approvals can be bed- or room-specific, so confirm current scope with the home on a tour. Where a number is shown it is the state’s own wording for how many residents the approval covers, not how many places are open today; where none is shown, the record simply does not state one.

Specific medical needs — insulin, oxygen, a catheter, an ostomy — aren’t in the state license record; ask the home directly. A feeding tube, tracheostomy, or advanced wound care usually needs skilled nursing →

See an error in these clearances? Report it — free →

What the state record says, word for word
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX (6) BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX (6).State service designation935 - ELDERLYthe CDSS license record, verbatim · checked August 2, 2026

Since 2021, the state has visited this home 18 times and filed 14 documents. The most recent is a facility evaluation report, dated October 20, 2025.

Most recent state visit
October 20, 2025
Occupancy at the April 26, 2024 visit
5 of 6 beds

The state's published file for this home includes 8 documents with transcribed findings, dated July 27, 2021 to April 26, 2024. 8 of the 8 carry the state's recorded outcome word: “Substantiated” (4), “Unsubstantiated” (4). 8 include the transcribed allegation the state investigated, word for word.

Summary composed by computer from the 8 documents below — every count derives from them, and the documents themselves are the state's records, verbatim. We never grade, score, or color a record.

What the state’s words mean
Substantiatedthe state found the allegation more likely true than notUnsubstantiatedinvestigated, but couldn’t be confirmed either way — not a finding of wrongdoingUnfoundedthe state concluded it was false or couldn’t have happenedType A citationthe most serious: an immediate health-or-safety risk, usually fixed on the spot or on a short deadlineType B citationless serious, with a deadline to fix
The last 36 months — 8 of 14 documentsFull record on the state’s site →
20251 state visit · 1 document
Oct 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

20244 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Administrator exposed himself to a resident Administrator offered unprescribed medication

Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mariana Agban and Michael Cava conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs requested copies of LIC 500 and Staff roster. At 1:45 PM LPAs conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and physical plant is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Allegation: Administrator exposed himself to a resident It was alleged that Administrator has exposed himself to R1. Administrator denied the allegation. Interviews with 4out of 5 residents denied the allegation. Interviews with 2 out of 2 staff members denied the allegation. Administrator stated that such behavior is not tolerated by himself or anyother staff. Furthermore, there were no witnesses that were identified to corroborate with the allegation. Based on interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Thereforethe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024 · control 31-AS-20210519164840
Apr 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Apr 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility food supply is insufficient Facility is not regularly cleaned by staff

Lincensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit for the above allegations. LPA arrived at the facility and was granted access by staff. Administrator arrived shortly after and LPA explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plan tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Allegation: Facility food supply is insufficient It was alleged that there was not enough food in the facility. During the physical plant tour, LPA observed sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. LPA interviewed 2 residents, 2 staff members and the Administrator. Interview with the Administrator revealed that food has never been an issue at the facility. Administrator stated that staff are providing generous food portions. Administrator confirmed that all residents eat 3 meals a day and have snacks in between meals. (Continue on 9099the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 11, 2024 · control 31-AS-20210519164840
Feb 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair. Staff do not respond to resident's requests for assistance in a timely manner.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff, Ray Reyes and Dennis Montales, and advised them of the complaint. The administrator was notified over the telephone. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents, a record review, and a physical plant inspection to insure the health and safety of the residents. Facility is in direpair/staff do not respond to resident's request in a timely manner: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that in the evening of, on or around 02/13/24, facility residents reported a smell of gas. Staff was notified, but informed resident that it will be addressed the next day. Late that night, into the early morning of 02/14/24, Resident 1 (R1) reported the smell of gas getting worse. Call for staff assistance was made, but there was a delay in staff response. Emergency responders (911) called, and the Fire Department responded tothe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240216115813
20232 state visits · 2 documents
Dec 1, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated

Allegation investigated: Staff is not following resident's dietary plan. Staff is withholding resident's medication. Staff is not providing utensils when serving meals to a resident in care.

Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff, Carmelita Aliga, and advised her of the complaint. Today's investigation consisted of resident and staff interviews, a review of facility records, a review of the facility food service and inspection of the physical plant. Staff is not following resient's dietary plan: In regards to the allegation, it was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) requires a special diet, but staff is using too much salt on R1's food and serving food that R1 cannot have. Interviews with staff and residents made at approximately 9:15am to 10:30am. Interviews with staff deny the allegation. Interviews with two of two residents also do not corroborate with the allegation. Interview with R1 reveal that they have a special meal, prepared and delivered to them weekly from Project Angel Food. These meals consists of Unsubstantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2023 · control 31-AS-20231121123001
Oct 5, 2023Facility evaluation reportReport on file

Report on file with the state — no findings text was published for this visit. The complete document is on the state’s site.

Beside homes the same size
Type A citations2typical 0
Type B citations3typical 0
Substantiated complaints5typical 0
Total complaints6typical 0
State visits on file18typical 6
“Typical” is the statewide median across the 5,773 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record — larger, longer-licensed homes accumulate more visits and reports, so compare like with like. One complaint can contain several allegations. Counts cover this license since 2019.
Year-by-year trend
YearVisitsDocumentsSubstantiated20251102024451202344120221102021352
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record.Operate this home? Respond to or correct any document here, free. Respond or correct →

See an error in these counts? Report it — free →

$4,000$6,500 /mo
our estimate — Los Angeles County band, market research June 2026; not this home’s quoted price
$3,000 · statewide low$8,000 · statewide high
California’s public record holds no per-home price, so we never invent one. Ask the home for its rate sheet, or
Ways families pay here
Private pay — ask what the base rate includes and what’s billed separately.SSI/SSP — California’s board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/mo (2026): $1,444.07 to the home, $182 stays with the resident.Medi-Cal ALW — this home is on the DHCS waiver list (checked August 9, 2026). Details →

Free for families · We never sell your information · Homes never pay to appear, and rankings are never affected by fees.

Cost range look wrong? Report it — free →Medi-Cal waiver fact wrong? Report it — free →

Ask how the 2024 complaint investigation report was corrected — what changed?
How is medication handled and logged day to day?
What’s in the base monthly rate, and what’s billed separately?
Staff-to-resident ratio on day and night shifts?
How are medical emergencies handled after hours?
How are care plans reviewed when a resident’s needs change?

Operate this home? This page is generated from CDSS public records — respond or correct it, free.
Claim your home → · See something wrong? → · How we source every fact →
Call (805) 832-8792

Is Reesejoy Care Home Ii licensed?

Yes — Reesejoy Care Home Ii is a licensed residential care home for the elderly (RCFE) in Granada Hills (Los Angeles County): California license #197609853, shown as licensed in the CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026, licensed for 6 residents. State records list 14 inspection and complaint documents since 2021; the most recent, a facility evaluation report dated October 20, 2025, appears in the inspection record on this page.

Can Reesejoy Care Home Ii care for dementia, hospice, bedridden, or non-ambulatory residents?

From the CDSS license record, checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS license record checked August 2, 2026 lists Reesejoy Care Home Ii with clearances for hospice care and bedridden; it does not list wheelchair / non-ambulatory and dementia / memory care. A clearance that is not on file is not a “no” — it may simply be unrecorded, so if your family needs one of these, ask the home directly and confirm its current scope on a tour.

Wheelchair / non-ambulatoryDementia / memory careHospice careBedridden

From the California state record. Some approvals are bed- or room-specific — always confirm current scope with the facility.

What the state record says, word for word
Verbatim, from the CDSS license recordAGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX (6) BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX (6).

How much does Reesejoy Care Home Ii cost?

California's public licensing record does not include Reesejoy Care Home Ii's monthly price, so we never show or estimate one for a specific home. As county-level context only, assisted living in Los Angeles County typically runs $5,000–$7,500/mo and small board-and-care homes $4,000–$6,500/mo (market research compiled June 2026 — ranges, not quotes; California's 2026 SSI/SSP board-and-care payment standard is $1,626.07/month, of which $1,444.07 is the room-and-board portion paid to the home). Ask the home for its own rate sheet and what the base rate includes — or use the cost section at the top of this page.

Does Reesejoy Care Home Ii accept Medi-Cal or the Assisted Living Waiver?

Yes — Medi-Cal can help pay for care at Reesejoy Care Home Ii through California's Assisted Living Waiver (ALW): the home appears on the Department of Health Care Services participant list checked August 9, 2026. The waiver pays for assisted-living care services — not room and board — for eligible Medi-Cal members, and each home takes a limited number of waiver residents, so ask the home about a current ALW opening.

Medi-Cal / ALW homes in Los Angeles County →Assisted living on Medi-Cal in California →See the DHCS list →

How full it was at the last state visit

5 of 6 beds occupied (83%) when the state visited on April 26, 2024. Availability changes constantly — confirm a current opening with the home.

What do state inspections show for Reesejoy Care Home Ii?

Verbatim from CDSS complaint-investigation reports — the state's own words, never summarized by us. Record checked August 2, 2026.

The CDSS state record checked August 2, 2026 lists 18 state visits and 14 dated documents since 2021 for Reesejoy Care Home Ii; 8 complaint-investigation narratives are transcribed verbatim below. The most recent, dated April 26, 2024, records an allegation the state marked “Unsubstantiated. Open any entry to read the state's full finding, word for word.

Most licensed homes receive some findings over 36 months; what matters is what was found and whether it was corrected. Counts here are shown compared with homes of similar size, and the state's own words appear in full below.

8 transcribed reports on file

2024

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedAdministrator exposed himself to a resident Administrator offered unprescribed medication
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mariana Agban and Michael Cava conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs requested copies of LIC 500 and Staff roster. At 1:45 PM LPAs conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and physical plant is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Allegation: Administrator exposed himself to a resident It was alleged that Administrator has exposed himself to R1. Administrator denied the allegation. Interviews with 4out of 5 residents denied the allegation. Interviews with 2 out of 2 staff members denied the allegation. Administrator stated that such behavior is not tolerated by himself or anyother staff. Furthermore, there were no witnesses that were identified to corroborate with the allegation. Based on interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. ThereforeCDSS inspection report, April 26, 2024 · control 31-AS-20210519164840
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility food supply is insufficient Facility is not regularly cleaned by staff
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Lincensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit for the above allegations. LPA arrived at the facility and was granted access by staff. Administrator arrived shortly after and LPA explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plan tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Allegation: Facility food supply is insufficient It was alleged that there was not enough food in the facility. During the physical plant tour, LPA observed sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. LPA interviewed 2 residents, 2 staff members and the Administrator. Interview with the Administrator revealed that food has never been an issue at the facility. Administrator stated that staff are providing generous food portions. Administrator confirmed that all residents eat 3 meals a day and have snacks in between meals. (Continue on 9099CDSS inspection report, April 11, 2024 · control 31-AS-20210519164840
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility is in disrepair. Staff do not respond to resident's requests for assistance in a timely manner.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff, Ray Reyes and Dennis Montales, and advised them of the complaint. The administrator was notified over the telephone. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents, a record review, and a physical plant inspection to insure the health and safety of the residents. Facility is in direpair/staff do not respond to resident's request in a timely manner: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that in the evening of, on or around 02/13/24, facility residents reported a smell of gas. Staff was notified, but informed resident that it will be addressed the next day. Late that night, into the early morning of 02/14/24, Resident 1 (R1) reported the smell of gas getting worse. Call for staff assistance was made, but there was a delay in staff response. Emergency responders (911) called, and the Fire Department responded toCDSS inspection report, February 22, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240216115813

2023

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedStaff is not following resident's dietary plan. Staff is withholding resident's medication. Staff is not providing utensils when serving meals to a resident in care.
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff, Carmelita Aliga, and advised her of the complaint. Today's investigation consisted of resident and staff interviews, a review of facility records, a review of the facility food service and inspection of the physical plant. Staff is not following resient's dietary plan: In regards to the allegation, it was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) requires a special diet, but staff is using too much salt on R1's food and serving food that R1 cannot have. Interviews with staff and residents made at approximately 9:15am to 10:30am. Interviews with staff deny the allegation. Interviews with two of two residents also do not corroborate with the allegation. Interview with R1 reveal that they have a special meal, prepared and delivered to them weekly from Project Angel Food. These meals consists of UnsubstantiatedCDSS inspection report, December 1, 2023 · control 31-AS-20231121123001
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility air conditioning in disrepair
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Chris Alemoh and Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. It was reported that the air conditioner is broken and it is hot at the facility. LPAs met with staff Bong Punsalang and Roy Sicam and advised them of the complaint. Administrator, Roberto Ramirez was advised of the complaint over the telephone. Today's investigation consisted of a physical plant inspection, and interviews with staff and residents According to staff, the air conditioning was just maintained. The free-on had just been changed, but there is still a leak. Maintenance was already called, and an appointment to conduct another repair is made for this afternoon (on 07/18/23). LPAs conducted a walkthrough of the physcial plant. Internal temperature was measured at approximatly 80 degrees. The facility has two kinds of air conditioning units. There are two portable units for rooms #5 and #6. Common areas such as the living room, diningCDSS inspection report, July 18, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230713111132

2021

Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Unsubstantiated
Allegation the state reviewedResident's bedroom furniture was replaced with cheaper furniture Facility staff are not taking resident to doctor's appointments Facility is not sanitary
State's findingUnsubstantiatedThe state investigated but could not confirm the allegation. This is not a finding of wrongdoing.
Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Cassandra Harris along with Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaQueena Lacy conducted an initial 10-day complaint visit. It is being alleged that R1's bedroom furntiure was replaced with lower quality furntiure, that facility staff are not taking R1 to R1's doctor appointments, and that the facility is not sanitary. During today's visit, LPM and LPA toured the physical plant, interviewed staff, interviewed residents, interviewed relevant parties, and reviewed records. - Resident's bedroom furniture was replaced with cheaper furniture Based on interviews, R1 was originally residing in a different room and R1's current room previously had different furniture. The allegation states that the current furniture is of lesser quality that the previous furniture. All of the furniture is property of the facility. R1 did not come with any furniture of their own. There are no functional concerns about the furniture in R1's room. Based on physical plant tour, LPM and LCDSS inspection report, August 5, 2021 · control 31-AS-20210805120509
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility staff did not give resident medication because it was inconvenient.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
An unannounced subsequent complaint visit was conducted on 08/05/2021 at 9:33am by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaQueena Lacy and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Cassandra Harris. Upon arrival LPA and LPM met with Administrator Roberto Ramirez and explained the purpose of this visit. It was alleged that R1 is not given pain medication when asks because staff told them it's "too much paperwork," To investigate this allegation on 07/27/2021 at 10:00am, LPAs gathered various facility records. Based on record review and interviews R1 had requested pain medication which is a Pro Re Nata (PRN). On the date of 07/27/2021 at 10am a complaint visit was conducted and copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation was obtained. Based on review of the records conducted on 07/27/21 at 10am, centrally stored medication log dated 06/04/2021, identifies Norco as PRN medication. PRN log was completely blank without any logged entries. On 07/27/2021, at 11:35am, R1 was interviewed and stCDSS inspection report, August 5, 2021 · control 31-AS-20210720125321
Complaint investigationAllegation reviewed · Substantiated
Allegation the state reviewedFacility did not meet resident's hygiene needs.
State's findingSubstantiatedThe state investigated and found this allegation more likely than not true.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) LaQueena Lacy and Angela Panushakina conducted an unannounced complaint visit for the above allegation. LPAs met with Administrator Roberto Ramirez and explained the purpose of this visit. The complainant was alleging that resident #1 (R1) was not bathed for a whole week because it is “too much work for the staff”. At 9:30am, with the assistance of the staff #1 (S1) LPAs conducted a physical plant tour and observed R1 in bed, covered in feces. LPAs observed S1 leaving R1’s room and walking towards the kitchen to wash the dishes. LPAs intervened and instructed S1 to go back to clean R1. At approximately 10:00am, LPAs reviewed facility files and obtained copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. Documents revealed that R1 is to be well groomed and kept clean. During this investigation, at 10:45am LPAs interviewed administrator, staff, and residents. Interviews revealed that R1 is to receive a bath two times a week, however, the last time R1 wasCDSS inspection report, July 27, 2021 · control 31-AS-20210720125321

Transcribed from CDSS complaint-investigation reports · record checked August 2, 2026.

What the state has logged

California has logged 18 state visits for this home as of August 2, 2026. These are the home's own counts, straight from that record — shown beside the statewide median for small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds), computed across all 5,773 licensed homes of that size, because larger and longer-licensed homes naturally accumulate more visits and reports. They are facts, not a grade — a citation may be minor and since corrected, and an “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing.

Type A citations
2
typical for this size: 0
Type B citations
3
typical for this size: 0
Substantiated complaints
5
typical for this size: 0
Total complaints
6
typical for this size: 0
State visits on file
18
typical for this size: 6
See the full inspection record on the state's site →

Who runs Reesejoy Care Home Ii?

From the CDSS ownership record, checked August 9, 2026.

Licensed to Rvr Corporation, who operates 4 licensed California homes in total. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.

Talk to this home directly

You can call them yourself, anytime — you never have to go through us.

(805) 832-8792
What isn't in the state record

Resident reviews, the exact monthly price, and the languages staff speak aren't part of California's public licensing record, so we don't show them here. Ask the home directly — the tour questions above are a good start.

Operate this home? The record above comes from California's public licensing data. You can respond or correct it — free. Claim your home — free →

See something wrong? Report an error — free → · How we source every fact →

This page is generated from CDSS Community Care Licensing public records. How we build these pages →

Do you run Reesejoy Care Home Ii? Claim this listing — free — add photos, activities, languages, and today’s availability.