Small home · Licensed for 6 · Granada Hills
Reesejoy Care Home II
17544 San Jose St, Granada Hills, CA 91344Licensed since 2019
Overview
No openings reported
- Approved by the state: Hospice · BedriddenState licensing record · October 26, 2026
- Ways to pay: Medi-Cal ALW acceptedDHCS participant list · October 1, 2026
- Licensed for 6: a small care homeThe state license record
Ask this home
Free for families. A home gets your number only if you say yes.
Care and support
- Hospiceup to 6 residents
- Bedridden
Not on file: wheelchair and dementia approvals.
Approved by the state · State licensing record · October 26, 2026. An approval may cover specific rooms or residents; it does not establish an opening.
Read the state’s own wording
AGE RANGE 60 AND OVER. SIX (6) BEDRIDDEN. HOSPICE WAIVER FOR SIX (6).
935 - ELDERLY
CDSS record, verbatim · October 26, 2026
As needs change
Staying through hospice
Hospice waiver on file · covers up to 6 — care may continue at the end of life
State licensing record · October 26, 2026
We’ll ask for you. Not on file for Reesejoy Care Home II: two-person transfers or a lift, who is awake overnight, help with medicines and care if memory loss develops. When we check availability, we ask about these too.
Check availabilityWhat it costs here
Covelight estimate
$4,600a month to start
Likely $3,750–$5,700
From 8 nearby homes that publish rates · this home’s rate is not on file
Monthly cost breakdownWith a shared room and basic help · room, care and fees$4,600likely a month
Memory care is not priced here: a dementia-care designation is not on file for this home. Ask the home.
Starting monthly rate$4,600likely $3,750–$5,700
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Basic help with daily careUsually includedup to $600
Basic help is usually part of the starting rate. Homes that price care by level start around $600 a month (44 California homes publish a care-level range, seen in September 2026).
One-time move-in fee$2,500one time · likely $0–$4,000
Homes that list a one-time entry or community fee charge a median of $2,500 (133 California listings; middle half $1,000–$4,000). Many homes list none — ask.
- Likely monthly totalLikely $3,750–$5,900
- $4,600
- First monthWith a one-time move-in fee · likely $4,450–$9,100
- $7,100
How people payOn the Medi-Cal waiver list · private pay, SSI/SSP, veterans, insurance
- MedicareDoes not pay for room and board in a care home. It can still cover hospice or home-health visits inside one.
- Private payMost residents pay from savings, a home sale or family help. Ask for the rate and what it includes in writing.
- Medi-Cal Assisted Living WaiverThis home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board. On the waiver, a resident on SSI/SSP pays the home $1,444.07 a month for room and board.
- SSI/SSPCalifornia’s 2026 standard is $1,626.07 a month; $1,444.07 of it goes to the home and $182 stays with the resident. Whether this home accepts it is not on file — ask.
- VeteransVA Aid & Attendance can add to a veteran’s or surviving spouse’s pension. Ask whether residents here have used it.
- Long-term care insuranceMost policies pay for licensed care homes. Ask what paperwork the home provides for claims.
Rates at nearby homes8 nearby homes publish starting rates of $3,000 to $7,500
8 homes like this within 3 miles publish starting rates mostly between $3,500–$7,450.
- Grant Serenity of Granada HillsGranada Hills · 0.6 mi · Small home$7,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Alaga HomesNorthridge · 1.5 mi · Small home$6,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Balboa Senior LivingGranada Hills · 1.7 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Alalik Care HomeGranada Hills · 2.0 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Aurora Home for SeniorsGranada Hills · 2.5 mi · Small home$3,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living · seen September 9, 2026
- Healthy Life Service FacilityNorth Hills · 2.6 mi · Small home$5,000Listed on Seniorly · assisted living private room · seen September 9, 2026
- Agape Senior ResidenceChatsworth · 2.8 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · seen September 9, 2026
- Breath of Sunshine PlusNorthridge · 2.9 mi · Small home$3,500Listed on Seniorly · assisted living shared bedroom · seen September 9, 2026
How this estimate worksWithin 25% for 7 in 10 homes in testing
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
- Only prices a home put out itself count: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price Seniorly says the home confirmed. Prices a listing site shows without saying where they came from are left out.
- Nearby homes are the nearest of the same size that publish a rate, widening from 3 to 40 miles until at least 8 do. The estimate starts from what they charge, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices.
- Room, care-level, second-person and move-in lines come from what California homes publish on listing sites. Memory care uses Covelight’s researched premium over assisted living.
- Totals add each line’s figure and combine the lines’ ranges as separate charges, because a home is rarely at the top, or the bottom, of every line at once.
- We tested this estimate on 1,546 California homes that publish their own starting rate. It was within 10% of the real rate for 3 in 10 homes and within 25% for 7 in 10; the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 (September 12, 2026).
- It cannot see this home’s specials, how it assesses care, or which rooms are open.
Avoid surprises on the billWhat changes the price, and what to ask
- The care level
Some homes charge one all-inclusive rate. Others add levels or points as needs grow. Ask how the level is set, who decides, and what the next level costs.
- What is billed separately
Medication management, incontinence supplies, transportation and a second person in the room are often extra. Ask for the list in writing.
- Move-in costs
A one-time move-in fee or deposit is common. Ask what it covers and whether any of it comes back if the stay is short.
- Increases
California requires at least 90 days’ written notice, with reasons, before a rate rises (Health & Safety Code §1569.655). A change in the resident’s care level is the section’s own exception and can be billed sooner.
An estimate for planning, not a quote. A home sets the price after hearing about the care needed.
Daily life
Daily life here is not on file yet. Most small homes haven’t published it, and that says nothing about the home.
The best way to see it is a visit.
Request a tourWhere it is
17544 San Jose St, Granada Hills, CA 91344Address from the public record · October 26, 2026. Confirm the entrance with the home before visiting.
Opening the neighborhood map…
- Northridge Hospital Medical CenterHospital · General acute care, on the state’s list3 mi
Straight-line distances; check the drive or the walk. Hospital: the nearest general acute care hospital on the state’s list (CDPH, September 16, 2026).
Open directionsThe state record
California inspects every licensed home and publishes what it found. A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
CDSS public record, read October 26, 2026 · License #197609853 · See the state’s own record
The last 36 months — 7 of 15 documents
Complaint outcomes in these 36 months, in the state’s words: 1 “Substantiated” and 3 “Unsubstantiated”.
20251 state visit · 1 document
Oct 20, 2025Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPAs met with staff, Cynthia Manala and Ferdinand Punsalang. They were both advised of the visit. At approximately 10:30am, with the assistance of staff, LPA took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms are battery operated. There is a carbon monoxide detector installed by the kitchen that functions properly. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. It was purchased 10/05/25. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Bedrooms: There were six (6) bedrooms of which five (5) designated for residents' use, and one (1) room for staff. Three of the bedrooms (rooms #3, #4, #5) are private. Rooms #1 and #2 are shared. Rooms occupied by residents were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: There are four (4) bathrooms. Three (3) are designated for residents' use and one is for staff. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was between at 108 to 112 degrees Fahrenheit. Cleaning supplies are being stored in the hallway bathroom. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area. The living room has sufficient seating with a coffee table and television. Thers is no fireplace. The dining table is large enough to seat up to six (6) residents. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Floors and furniture were clean and maintained. Hallways and passageways were clear of any obstruction. Garage: Garage is attached to the home. Laundry area is in the garage, which is also used as storage and break room for staff. Garage is locked at all times. No resident access. Laundry Area: Laundry area is in the garage. Cleaning supplies and detergents maintained in the garage, which was kept locked during the inspection. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. The outdoor area was free of hazards. There is outdoor furniture appropriate for resident's use. There is no swimming pool or any other bodies of water. Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medications are kept locked in a kitchen cabinet. Medication and Medication Records were reviewed for proper storage and documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 20, 2025
20244 state visits · 5 documents
Dec 7, 2024Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPAs met with the administrator, Roberto Ramirez, and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 11:45am, with the assistance of the administrator, LPAs took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms are battery operated. There is a carbon monoxide detector installed by the kitchen that functions properly. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. It was purchased 10/07/24. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Properly labeled medications were locked in one of the kitchen cabinets. Bedrooms: There were six (6) bedrooms of which five (5) designated for residents' use, and one (1) room for staff. Three of the bedrooms (rooms #3, #4, #5) are private. Rooms #1 and #2 are shared. Rooms occupied by residents were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Bathrooms: There are four (4) bathrooms. Three (3) are designated for residents' use. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was between at 105 to 109 degrees Fahrenheit. Cleaning supplies are being stored in the hallway bathroom. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area. The living room has a couch, two recliners, television and coffee table. No fireplace. The dining room has a table large enough to seat up to six (6) residents. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Floors and furniture were clean and maintained. Hallways and passageways were clear of any obstruction. Garage: Garage is attached to the home. It is locked and only used as storage. No resident access. Laundry Area: Laundry area is in the garage. Cleaning supplies and detergents maintained in the garage, which was kept locked during the inspection. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The laundry area and detergents are located in the garage which is kept locked and inaccessible. The garage is also used as storage area, and staff break room. . Resident Files: Resident files are kept in a cabinet in the living room. LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: Staff records are kept in a cabinet in the living room. LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medications are kept locked in a kitchen cabinet. Medication and Medication Records were reviewed for proper storage and documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there were no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 7, 2024
Apr 26, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Administrator exposed himself to a resident Administrator offered unprescribed medication
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mariana Agban and Michael Cava conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit at this facility to investigate the above allegations. LPAs met with staff and explained the reason for the visit. LPAs requested copies of LIC 500 and Staff roster. At 1:45 PM LPAs conducted a physical plant tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and physical plant is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Allegation: Administrator exposed himself to a resident It was alleged that Administrator has exposed himself to R1. Administrator denied the allegation. Interviews with 4out of 5 residents denied the allegation. Interviews with 2 out of 2 staff members denied the allegation. Administrator stated that such behavior is not tolerated by himself or anyother staff. Furthermore, there were no witnesses that were identified to corroborate with the allegation. Based on interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. (Continue on 9099C) Unsubstantiated Allegation: Administrator offered unprescribed medication. It was alleged that Administrator had offered R1 viagra on several occasions. Administrator denied the allegation. Interview with 4 out of 5 residents denied the allegation, adding they've never been administered medication that wasn't prescribed. Interview with Administrator revealed that although administrator uses viagra for their own medical condition, they haven't offered any unprescribed medication to R1 and or any of the other residents. Administrator explained the severity of offering unpresecribed medication to any of the residents. Based on interviews, there is not enough information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is UNSUBSTANTIATED at this time. Exit interview conducted and a copy of this report delivered.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024 · control 31-AS-20210519164840
Apr 26, 2024Facility evaluation reportCase Management - DeficienciesDeficiency pages: Type A, Type B
Type of visit: Case Management - Deficiencies
In conjunction to the complaint number 31-AS-20210519164840 Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Mariana Agban and Michael Cava conducted a case management- Deficiencies visit. During the complaint investigation, LPAs conducted medication and Medication Records review for proper documentation for three (3) out 5 residents. LPAs could not complete an accurate medication count due to incomplete medication forms. LPAs also observed insufficient food, within for a total of 5 residents in care. On 04/11/2024 Interviews with 2 out of 5 residents revealed that there's no variety of food and that it's only based on Filipino cuisine. LPA Agban had issued Advisory Notes - Technical Assistance regarding food variety. LPA Agban had advised Administrator that meals shall consist an appropriate variety of foods. On today's visit interviews with 3 out 5 residents confirmed that staff don't offer variety of food. Exit Interview Conducted. Deficiencies Cited. Report Issuedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 85076(d)(1) · Plan of correction due date: May 4, 2024
85076 Food Service (d) The licensee shall meet the following food supply and storage requirements: (1) Supplies of staple nonperishable foods for a minimum of one week and fresh perishable foods for a minimum of two days shall be maintained on the premise. This requirement is not met as evidence Based on teams observations, insufficient food, within the regulation was observed for a total of five residents in care. This poses an immediate health, safety, or personal rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024
Plan of correction: The licensee shall purchase sufficient food, a copy of receipt and photo documentation of sufficient food shall be submitted by the POC due date.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR87465(a)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Apr 27, 2024
Incidential Medical and Dental Care. The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on medications review, the licensee did not comply with the section cited above, as the LPAs could not complete an accurate medication count, which poses an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024
Plan of correction: Within 24 hours, The licensee shall review 87465(a)(5) and submit a written memo of understanding to LPA by the POC date. The licensee will conducted training to address this section and submit proof of training to LPA by May 10, 2024.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: HSC 87555(b)(5) · Plan of correction due date: May 3, 2024
87555 GENERAL FOOD SERVICE REQUIREMENTS (b) (5) Meals shall consist of an appropriate variety of foods and shall be planned with consideration for cultural and religious background and food habits of residents. This requirement is not met as evidence Based on interviews, 3 out 5 residents confirmed that staff don't offer variety of food. This poses a potenital health, safety, or personal rights risk to clients in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 26, 2024
Plan of correction: Administrator will make new weekly menus to insure that there is a variety of food being served. Administrator will submit copies of menu to LPA by the POC date.
Apr 11, 2024Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility food supply is insufficient Facility is not regularly cleaned by staff
Lincensing Program Analyst (LPA) Mariana Agban conducted an unannounced subsequent complaint visit for the above allegations. LPA arrived at the facility and was granted access by staff. Administrator arrived shortly after and LPA explained the reason for the visit. LPA conducted a physical plan tour, to ensure health and safety of the residents are protected and is in compliance with Title 22 Regulations. Allegation: Facility food supply is insufficient It was alleged that there was not enough food in the facility. During the physical plant tour, LPA observed sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. LPA interviewed 2 residents, 2 staff members and the Administrator. Interview with the Administrator revealed that food has never been an issue at the facility. Administrator stated that staff are providing generous food portions. Administrator confirmed that all residents eat 3 meals a day and have snacks in between meals. (Continue on 9099C) Unsubstantiated Interview with the 2 residents out of 5 revealed that food supply is sufficient, however, it has no variety food. Based on interviews and observation, this allegation is Unsubstantiated at this time. Allegation: Facility is not regularly cleaned by staff It was alleged that the facility was not clean and facility toilet is broken. During the physical plant, LPA observed the facility to be clean. LPA inspected facility bathrooms and they were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Interviewed 2 residents out of 5 revealed that staff are regularly clean the facility. Based on interviews and observations, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted a copy of this report signed and deliveredthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Apr 11, 2024 · control 31-AS-20210519164840
The state marks this report as 3 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 2. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
Feb 22, 2024Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility is in disrepair. Staff do not respond to resident's requests for assistance in a timely manner.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff, Ray Reyes and Dennis Montales, and advised them of the complaint. The administrator was notified over the telephone. Today's investigation consisted of interviews with staff and residents, a record review, and a physical plant inspection to insure the health and safety of the residents. Facility is in direpair/staff do not respond to resident's request in a timely manner: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that in the evening of, on or around 02/13/24, facility residents reported a smell of gas. Staff was notified, but informed resident that it will be addressed the next day. Late that night, into the early morning of 02/14/24, Resident 1 (R1) reported the smell of gas getting worse. Call for staff assistance was made, but there was a delay in staff response. Emergency responders (911) called, and the Fire Department responded to a gas leak. As a result of staff's late response, R1 experienced a headache, itchy throat and nose irritation. Prior to the investigation, LPA made contact with the Los Substantiated Angeles Fire Department (LAFD), Fire Prevention and Public Safety Bureau, who confirmed response to facility address was made for leaking natural gas on 02/14/24, between the hours of 2-3am. Interviews made at facility with staff and residents corroborated with the allegations. Per administrator, and staff, the advise made by LAFD, to replace the stove, has been made on 02/19/24, and a technician came out to inspect and service the leak on 02/14/24. Pictures of invoices for the purchase and service obtained. Based on the information obtained, the allegations of Facility is in disrepair and staff did not respond to resident's request in a timely manner is Substantiated. Citations issued on the 9099D. administered as prescribed when assessed at their medical appointment. Interview with the administrator confirmed that R1 wasn't administered Bumex/Bumetanide from February 14 to February 17 because it was ordered by their physician to hold prior to R1's dialysis scheduled for that week. In regards to R1's insulin, per administrator and staff, R1 is able to check their own blood sugar and inject their insulin on their own, with staff stand by only for supervision. Interviews with R1 confirms that Bumex was placed on hold per doctor's orders. R1 also confirmed that they are able to administer their own insulin, and check their blood sugar. R1 further stated that their medications is given to them as prescribed by their physician. R1 had no complaints with not getting assistance with their medications, as they confirmed with the LPA during their interview, that they get it as prescribed. LPA also interviewed the other four (4) residents, who expressed no complaints of not getting their medications as prescribed, or staff not being able to meet their needs. Based on the information obtained, there wasn't enough evidence to corroborate the allegations of Staff not administering resident their medications as prescribed and Staff not having the competency to meet the resident's needs. Therefore, the allegations is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff member is unable to communicate with resident due to language barrier: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that facility has new staff. Two were reported to not hearing well, and one does not speak English. No names were identified to the allegation. Interviews with two (2) of two staff, that were present during the investigation, deny the allegation. Both staff stated they haven't gotten any complaints or concerns from the residents about not being able to communicate with them. Interviews with five (5) of five residents do not corroborate with the allegation. Residents do admit staff speaks another language, but are still able to communicate with them in English. During LPA's interviews with staff, it was confirmed that staff does have an accent, and speak another language, but LPA was still able to communicate with them and understand their English. Based on the information obtained there was insufficient evidence to prove staff is unable to communicate with residents due to a language barrier. Therefore, the allegations is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024 · control 31-AS-20240216115813
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 22, 2024
Maintenance and Operation: The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement was not met as evidenced by Although arrangements were made tohave a technician address the smell of gas, and licensee purchased a new stove, per LAFD recommendations, efforts should have already been made to prevent the smell of gas from worsening, and affecting a resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024
Plan of correction: (continued).. This posed a potential health and safety risk to residents in care. Licensee did arrange for a technician to check out the stove, burner and gas leak on 02/14/24, and eventually replaced the old stove, purchasing a new stove on 02/19/24, per LAFD recommendation. Copies of these invoices obtained during the day of the investigation. No further corrections needed at this time.
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87411(a) · Plan of correction due date: Feb 29, 2024
Personnel Requirements - General: Facility personnel shall at all times be sufficient in numbers, and competent to provide the services necessary to meet resident needs. This requirement was not met as evidenced by: Information received confirming that there was a staff delay in a response to a resident's need when the smell of gas was worsening in the early morning of 02/14/24, resulting in R1 to experieince headache, itchy throat and nose irritation. This posed a potential health and safety risk to the resident in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Feb 22, 2024
Plan of correction: Although arrangements were made to address the smell of gas, efforts were not made to assist R1 immediately the morning of 02/14/14. As POC, licensee will have staff review this section of the regulations, and self-certify that they have read and understood this section of the regulations. POC is due to the licensing agency by 02/29/24.
20231 state visit · 1 document
Dec 1, 2023Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Staff is not following resident's dietary plan. Staff is withholding resident's medication. Staff is not providing utensils when serving meals to a resident in care.
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegations. LPA met with staff, Carmelita Aliga, and advised her of the complaint. Today's investigation consisted of resident and staff interviews, a review of facility records, a review of the facility food service and inspection of the physical plant. Staff is not following resient's dietary plan: In regards to the allegation, it was alleged that Resident 1 (R1) requires a special diet, but staff is using too much salt on R1's food and serving food that R1 cannot have. Interviews with staff and residents made at approximately 9:15am to 10:30am. Interviews with staff deny the allegation. Interviews with two of two residents also do not corroborate with the allegation. Interview with R1 reveal that they have a special meal, prepared and delivered to them weekly from Project Angel Food. These meals consists of Unsubstantiated either chicken, turkey or shredded pork, vegetables, green beans or peas. Meals are specifically ordered by R1 or their family member, and delivered to the facility every Monday, that is good for the week. Also, alternate meals are prepared for R1, but denies steak or food with high sodium is ever served to them. At approximately 10:40am to 11:40am, a review of facility records were made. Record review reveal that R1 does require a low sodium and diabetic diet, which according to staff, they follow. At approximately 12pm, staff demonstrated to the LPA a meal (lunch) served to R1, and a list of dietary restrictions to R1, that is posted in the kitchen. A copy of this list of restrictions obtained, and a picture of the meal taken. Based on the information provided during the day's visit, there was insufficient evidence to prove that R1's dietary plan is not being followed. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff is withholding resident's medication: In regards to the allegation, it was reported that staff has withheld R1's water pill for an entire week. No dates specified when this incident occurred. Interview with a third party could not confirm or specify any dates if this medication was not given as prescribed. Interview with R1 could not confirm the time and day of when their medicine wasn't given to them as prescribed. LPA reviewed R1's medication records for October and November 2023, and did not observe any discrepancies. Copies of these records were obtained. Interviews with two of two residents deny the allegation, stating they've been getting their medications as prescribed. No complaints or concerns raised by these residents. Based on the information obtained there was insufficient evidence to prove that R1's medications were withheld. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time. Staff is not providing utensils when serving meals to a resident in care: In regards to the allegation it was alleged that R1 was served meals without utensils. Interviews with staff deny the allegation. Interview with R1 revealed that this had occurred once as far that they can recall, but couldn't recall when, and has not happened since. Interviews with two of two residents also deny the allegation. These residents stated they are provided and satisfied with a complete meal, and confirm utensils are included when meals are served. At approximately 12:00pm, LPA inspected the food service and observed utensils provided on the trays when meals were being served for the day. A picture was taken. Based on the information obtained, there was insufficient evidence to prove utensils not provided when meals are served to the residents. Therefore, the allegation is deemed Unsubstantiated at this time.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Dec 1, 2023 · control 31-AS-20231121123001
Earlier years2021 to 2023 · 8 documents
20233 state visits · 3 documents
Oct 5, 2023Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Christopher Alemoh and Michael Cava conducted an Annual Required visit and inspection of the facility. LPAs met with the administrator, Roberto Ramirez and staff, Mellie Aliga and explained the reason for the visit. At approximately 9:00am, with the assistance of staff, LPAs took a tour of the physical plant. Required postings were observed in the entry area. The smoke alarms are battery operated. There is a carbon monoxide detector installed by the kitchen that functions properly. The fire extinguisher is located in the kitchen. It was purchased 09/28/22. Kitchen: The kitchen appliances and fixtures were functional. LPA found a sufficient amount of perishable and non-perishable food at the facility; properly stored. Knives were stored in a locked drawer in the kitchen. Properly labeled medications were locked in one of the kitchen cabinets. Bedrooms: There were six (6) bedrooms of which five (5) designated for residents' use, and one (1) room for staff. Three of the bedrooms (rooms #3, #4, #5) are private. Rooms #1 and #2 are shared. Rooms occupied by residents were properly furnished with appropriate beddings and linens with sufficient lighting. Rooms #2 and #3 are vacant. Bathrooms: There are four (4) bathrooms. Three (3) are designated for residents' use. Bathrooms were properly supplied and had functional fixtures. Hot water temperature was between at 115 to 116 degrees Fahrenheit. Cleaning supplies are being stored in the hallway bathroom. Common Areas: These included the living room and dining area. The common areas were properly furnished. The auditory alarms on all exit doors were on and functional at the time of the visit. Surrounding Grounds: Entry/exits were free of obstruction. The outdoor area was free of hazards. The laundry area and detergents are located in the garage which is kept locked and inaccessible. The garage is also used as storage area, and staff break room. . Resident Files: LPA conducted a file review of resident records to insure compliance of licensing forms. Staff Files: LPA also conducted a file review of staff records to insure forms and training are up to date and compliance with licensing forms. Medications: Medication and Medication Records were review for proper documentation. Pursuant to Title 22 Division 6 of the CA Code of Regulations, there no deficiencies observed during the visit. Exit Interview Conducted and a copy of the Report Issued.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 5, 2023
Aug 1, 2023Facility evaluation reportCase Management - OtherReport on file
Type of visit: Case Management - Other
As a follow up to complaint control 31-AS-20230713111132, Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) Michael Cava conducted a Case Management visit to the facility to insure the air conditioning is operational and internal room temperatures are maintained at a comfortable level. LPA met with staff, Bong Punsalang, and advised him of the visit. LPA also spoke with the administrator, Roberto Ramirez over the telephone. During the course of the visit, at approximately 11:50am to 12:30pm, LPA checked all the resident rooms and common areas. LPA observed that the room temperature is being maintained at 76 degrees. According to staff, the air conditioning has been repaired and rooms were maintained at a comfortable level since the LPA's last visit that was made on 07/18/23. From 12:30pm to 1:30pm, six (6) of six (6) residents were interviewed. All six residents did not express any complaints of the room temperature not being maintained at a comfortable level, and that the air conditioning unit is operational. Based on interviews and the physical plant inspection, the facility is compliant with maintaining a comfortable room temperature for their clients and visitors. Therefore, no citations issued during today's visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 1, 2023
Jul 18, 2023Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility air conditioning in disrepair
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) Chris Alemoh and Michael Cava conducted a complaint visit to the facility to investigate the above allegation. It was reported that the air conditioner is broken and it is hot at the facility. LPAs met with staff Bong Punsalang and Roy Sicam and advised them of the complaint. Administrator, Roberto Ramirez was advised of the complaint over the telephone. Today's investigation consisted of a physical plant inspection, and interviews with staff and residents According to staff, the air conditioning was just maintained. The free-on had just been changed, but there is still a leak. Maintenance was already called, and an appointment to conduct another repair is made for this afternoon (on 07/18/23). LPAs conducted a walkthrough of the physcial plant. Internal temperature was measured at approximatly 80 degrees. The facility has two kinds of air conditioning units. There are two portable units for rooms #5 and #6. Common areas such as the living room, dining room, kitchen and resident rooms #1, #2, and #3 rely on central air. LPAs checked the furnace and central Substantiated units and observed the free-on was replaced with a new one. LPAs also checked the central air conditioning unit at the outside of the home, and was told of where the leak was coming from. Interviews with three (3) of the six (6) residents stated there are times, especially during the extreme heat, that the internal temperature is too warm and uncomfortable. Aside from the use of electric fans, staff does try to accommodate by providing cold beverages, ice cream and hosing down the outside of the room so there would be some cold moisture. Based on the information obtained through interviews and a physical plant inspection, the allegation of the air conditioning unit is in disrepair is Substantiated. Citation issued on the 9099 D.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2023 · control 31-AS-20230713111132
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87303(a) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 18, 2023
Maintenance and Operation: The facility shall be clean, safe, sanitary and in good repair at all times. Maintenance shall include provision of maintenance services and procedures for the safety and well-being of residents, employees and visitors. This requirement is not met as evidenced by: Based on the physical plant inspection and interviews during the investigation made on 07/18/23, it was confirmed that the facility air conditioning unit is in disrepair.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 18, 2023
Plan of correction: Administrator stated they have since addressed the air conditioning. Free-on had just been replaced. Furthermore, another repair company will repair the leak of the air conditioning unit today, 07/18/23. No further corrections needed at this time.
20221 state visit · 1 document
Oct 26, 2022Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
Licensing Program Analyst (LPA), Patrick Shanahan, arrived at the facility in order to conduct an infection control annual. The LPA was greeted by the facility administrator. The LPA's temperature was taken upon entry and all COVID-19 protocols were taken. The home consists of 5 bedrooms and 2 bathrooms. The LPA was able to test the smoke alarms and carbon monoxide detectors, which all functioned properly. A fire extinguisher was observed in the kitchen to be functional. The facility is currently following their infection control plan and no deficiencies were observed during the visit.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Oct 26, 2022
20213 state visits · 4 documents
Sep 24, 2021Facility evaluation reportRoutine visitReport on file
Type of visit: Required - 1 Year
LPA Shanahan conducted an annual inspection. LPA arrived at the facility and observed the required COVID signs on the front door. LPA was greeted by Caregiver and LPA observed caregiver wearing a mask. LPA confirmed the reason for the visit is to conduct an annual inspection. Caregiver confirmed there are three residents at the facility. Caregiver took LPA's temperature and asked LPA the COVID questions. LPA was asked to sign in at the sign in station. LPA observed thermometer, sign in sheet, masks, and hand sanitizer located at the front door. Administrator arrived a short while later. LPA observed all three residents in their rooms. LPA was seated at the dining room table. LPA observed the knives and cleaning supplies were locked in drawers and cabinets. LPA observed the medications were locked in a kitchen cabinet. LPA observed an adequate supply of fresh fruits and vegetables in the refrigerator. The freezer contained frozen meats. Water temperature was measured at 123.3 degrees F. LPA was then escorted through the home and observed the residents rooms were neat and clean. LPA observed the bathroom which contained wash your hands sign, paper towels, hand sanitizer, and trash can. LPA observed the locked garage which contained the washer and dryer, laundry and additional chemicals. There are no deficiencies to report at this time. Exit interview was conducted, appeal rights discussed, and LPA confirmed the report will be emailed to the Administrator.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Sep 24, 2021
Aug 5, 2021Complaint investigation reportUnsubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Resident's bedroom furniture was replaced with cheaper furniture Facility staff are not taking resident to doctor's appointments Facility is not sanitary
Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Cassandra Harris along with Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaQueena Lacy conducted an initial 10-day complaint visit. It is being alleged that R1's bedroom furntiure was replaced with lower quality furntiure, that facility staff are not taking R1 to R1's doctor appointments, and that the facility is not sanitary. During today's visit, LPM and LPA toured the physical plant, interviewed staff, interviewed residents, interviewed relevant parties, and reviewed records. - Resident's bedroom furniture was replaced with cheaper furniture Based on interviews, R1 was originally residing in a different room and R1's current room previously had different furniture. The allegation states that the current furniture is of lesser quality that the previous furniture. All of the furniture is property of the facility. R1 did not come with any furniture of their own. There are no functional concerns about the furniture in R1's room. Based on physical plant tour, LPM and LPA did not observe any defects of the furniture in R1's room. Unsubstantiated - Facility staff are not taking resident to doctor's appointments Based on interviews, staff ensure that resident's attend doctor's appointments by arranging for transportation. If needed, staff will accompany residents to their appointments. Based on staff and relevant party interviews and a review of records, R1 is on hospice and hospice nurses visit R1 twice per week. R1's hospice care plan is overseen by the hospice doctor. Per staff interviews, if R1 had additional doctor's appointments, transportation would be arranged, however, R1 has not recently had additional doctor's appointments. Administrator also personally takes residents to doctor's appointments as needed. - Facility is not sanitary During the physical plant tour, LPM and LPA did not observe unsanitary conditions. There was sufficient lighting and furniture in common areas and the facility was observed to be clean at the time of the visit. Based on information obtained, the allegations are deemed unsubstantiated at this time. Exit interview conducted, appeal rights discussed, and a copy of the report was issuedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2021 · control 31-AS-20210805120509
Aug 5, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility staff did not give resident medication because it was inconvenient.
An unannounced subsequent complaint visit was conducted on 08/05/2021 at 9:33am by Licensing Program Analyst (LPA) LaQueena Lacy and Licensing Program Manager (LPM) Cassandra Harris. Upon arrival LPA and LPM met with Administrator Roberto Ramirez and explained the purpose of this visit. It was alleged that R1 is not given pain medication when asks because staff told them it's "too much paperwork," To investigate this allegation on 07/27/2021 at 10:00am, LPAs gathered various facility records. Based on record review and interviews R1 had requested pain medication which is a Pro Re Nata (PRN). On the date of 07/27/2021 at 10am a complaint visit was conducted and copies of pertinent documents relevant to the investigation was obtained. Based on review of the records conducted on 07/27/21 at 10am, centrally stored medication log dated 06/04/2021, identifies Norco as PRN medication. PRN log was completely blank without any logged entries. On 07/27/2021, at 11:35am, R1 was interviewed and stated that they have been in the facility since 06/04/21 and has not taken any pain medication. Facility staff interviewed on 07/27/2021 at approximatley 11:53am was unable to provide any credible explanation as to why R1’s PRN log was blank. Based on observations, record reviews and interviews there is sufficient information to verify the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is substantiated. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report and appeal rights issued. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2021 · control 31-AS-20210720125321
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type B · Section cited: CCR 87465(a)(5) · Plan of correction due date: Aug 15, 2021
87465 Incidental Medical and Dental Care (a)A plan for incidental medical and dental care shall be developed by each facility. The plan shall encourage routine medical and dental care and provide for assistance in obtaining such care, by compliance with the following: (5)The licensee shall assist residents with self-administered medications as needed. This requirement is not met as evidenced by. Based on interviews and record review, the staff did not dispensed PRN pain medication to R1. This possess an immediate health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Aug 5, 2021
Plan of correction: Licensee will provide additional medication training to all staff by appropriate professional(s). Proof of in-service training sign-in log will be submitted to LPA.
Jul 27, 2021Complaint investigation reportSubstantiated
Allegation investigated: Facility did not meet resident's hygiene needs.
Licensing Program Analysts (LPAs) LaQueena Lacy and Angela Panushakina conducted an unannounced complaint visit for the above allegation. LPAs met with Administrator Roberto Ramirez and explained the purpose of this visit. The complainant was alleging that resident #1 (R1) was not bathed for a whole week because it is “too much work for the staff”. At 9:30am, with the assistance of the staff #1 (S1) LPAs conducted a physical plant tour and observed R1 in bed, covered in feces. LPAs observed S1 leaving R1’s room and walking towards the kitchen to wash the dishes. LPAs intervened and instructed S1 to go back to clean R1. At approximately 10:00am, LPAs reviewed facility files and obtained copies of documents pertinent to the investigation. Documents revealed that R1 is to be well groomed and kept clean. During this investigation, at 10:45am LPAs interviewed administrator, staff, and residents. Interviews revealed that R1 is to receive a bath two times a week, however, the last time R1 was given a bed bath, was one week ago. The allegation was the facility did not meet resident's hygiene needs. A review of documents conducted at 10:00am verified the information received from interviews. Based on observations and interviews, there is sufficient information to support the allegation. Therefore, the allegation is substantiated at this time. Citation issued, appeal rights discussed and given. Exit interview conducted. Copy of this report issued. Substantiatedthe state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 27, 2021 · control 31-AS-20210720125321
From the deficiency page — Deficiency type: Type A · Section cited: CCR 87464(d) · Plan of correction due date: Jul 29, 2021
87464 (d) Basic Services A facility need not accept a particular resident for care. However, if a facility chooses to accept a particular resident for care, the facility shall be responsible for meeting the resident's needs….and providing the other basic services… either directly or through outside resources. This requirement is not met as evidenced by; The facility staff did not ensure that R1’s hygiene needs are met. R1 was not bathed for a week and observed to be covered in feces. This poses a potential health and safety risk to residents in care.the state’s words, verbatim · CDSS document, Jul 27, 2021
Plan of correction: Licencee will provide in-service training with staff. Create a check list of daily ADLs to assist staff to ensure all residents in care needs and services are met. Licensee shall email a copy of the in-service training and sign-in sheet to LPA.
The state marks this report as 4 pages; the online copy we transcribed has 3. You can request the full file from the county licensing office.
5 of 6 beds were occupied at the April 26, 2024 state visit — a count on that day, not an opening.
License holder
Rvr Corporation, licensed since 2019.
Operates 4 licensed homes in California. Running more than one home is common and is neither good nor bad on its own.
- Reesejoy Care Home IV · West Hills
- Petit Oasis · Camarillo
- Reesejoy Care Home III · Port Hueneme
The state’s totals for this licenseSince 2019, as the state’s facility page counts them
- State visits on file
- 12
- Total complaints
- 4
- Substantiated allegations
- 3
- Type A citations
- 1
- Type B citations
- 2
These are the state’s own totals for this license since 2019, per CDSS records. The state counts them apart from the documents above, and they can differ from what those documents show; the documents say what each visit found. One complaint can contain several allegations.
Compare with homes the same size
| This home | Typical | |
|---|---|---|
| Type A citations | 1 | 0 |
| Type B citations | 2 | 0 |
| Substantiated allegations | 3 | 0 |
| Total complaints | 4 | 0 |
“Typical” is the statewide median for licensed homes this size. It does not adjust for years licensed, and older licenses have had more visits and reports. The median is across the 6,916 licensed small board-and-care homes (6 or fewer beds) in the state record. The figures compared are the state’s totals, not the documents.
What the state’s words mean
CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗ · CDSS complaint outcomes ↗
An “unsubstantiated” complaint is not a finding of wrongdoing — it means the state investigated and could not confirm the allegation. Outcome words are the state’s own; we never grade, score, or color a record, and we publish no reviews — the state’s dated documents stand in their place.
Frequently asked questions
A citation does not make a home unsafe, and an empty file does not make a home good.
Quick answers about Reesejoy Care Home II
Is Reesejoy Care Home II licensed?
The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
How many residents is Reesejoy Care Home II licensed for?
6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Has Reesejoy Care Home II been cited?
1 Type A and 2 Type B citations since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. Those records count 12 state visits over the same years.
Is Reesejoy Care Home II still open?
This license was on the CDSS roster as of November 12, 2026.
What does Reesejoy Care Home II cost?
$4,600 a month to start is a Covelight estimate, likely $3,750–$5,700. This home’s own rate is not on file. Ask: “What is the all-in monthly rate, and what would push it higher?”
Covelight’s estimate starts from the rates 8 small homes within 3 miles publish, then adjusts for this home’s size, state care approvals, Medi-Cal waiver participation, years licensed and the area’s prices. In testing, the likely range held the real rate for 6 in 10 homes. This home’s own rate is not on file.
Among 232 other homes of a similar licensed size across Los Angeles County that publish a starting rate, the middle half runs $4,000 to $6,151 a month, and the middle figure is $5,000 (n = 232 other homes publishing a starting rate).
Each of those is a home’s own published figure, gathered on its own date between September and October 2026 — not an average of ours, and not a survey. Similar size means small and mid-size homes counted together, and large communities counted on their own, because they are different markets.
A home outside the band is not overcharging or underpricing: a starting rate covers different things in different homes, which is the first thing to ask about.
The price is made in the phone call. Nothing here is a quote, an offer or a discount.
A starting rate is the room and the base care. California homes commonly bill care levels, medication management, supplies, transport and a second person in the room as extras. Many also charge a one-time fee at move-in. Ask for that list in writing before anything is signed.
Only prices a home put out itself count here: its own website, a listing it supplied, or a price a listing site says the home confirmed. Prices a site shows without saying where they came from are left out. What Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver covers in a care home.
Does Reesejoy Care Home II take Medi-Cal?
On Medi-Cal’s Assisted Living Waiver: this home appears on the DHCS participation list, October 1, 2026. Confirm eligibility and current participation with the program. The waiver pays for care services, not room and board.
Who holds the license?
The license is held by Rvr Corporation, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. See the homes licensed to Rvr Corporation — at least 4 on the state roster.
Is there a hospital nearby?
Northridge Hospital Medical Center is 3 miles away in a straight line, per the CDPH licensed-hospital list dated September 16, 2026. See licensed care homes near it.
Can Reesejoy Care Home II keep a resident on hospice?
Hospice care is approved on this license, covering up to 6 residents, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
Reesejoy Care Home II license and inspection record
- Name on the license: “REESEJOY CARE HOME II”, per the CDSS roster as of May 25, 2025.
- License #197609853. The state lists this license as “Licensed,” per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed for 6 residents — a small home, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- Licensed to Rvr Corporation, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- First licensed in 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 12 state inspection visits since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
- 1 Type A and 2 Type B citations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. The same records count 12 state visits in that period.
- 4 complaints and 3 substantiated allegations on file since 2019, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026. One complaint can carry several allegations.
- The most recent state visit on file is October 20, 2025, per CDSS records as of October 26, 2026.
California writes these definitions for every licensed home, not for this one. CDSS citation definitions (PDF) ↗
Nearby
Other homes nearby
Licensed homes near this one in Los Angeles County, most information on file first. Every listed home appears on the same terms.
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$5,050 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,150–$6,250On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,700 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,850–$5,750On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,750 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,850On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,900 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $4,000–$6,050On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,900–$5,900On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
- Map
Estimated starting rate
$4,800 a month to start
Covelight estimate · likely $3,950–$5,950On the state record
- Wheelchair: on the state record
- Dementia: on the state record
- Hospice: on the state record
- Bedridden: on the state record
Street maps © Protomaps · © OpenStreetMap
Explore Los Angeles County